Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views8 pages

Management Science 2

1. Under different criteria for decision making, the document recommends different options for keyboard procurement: manufacturing its own (maximax), buying locally (maximin), buying from Japan (Laplace), or buying from Japan (minimax regret). 2. When considering expected values of different procurement options, buying from Japan has the highest expected value. The expected value of perfect information is 9,000. 3. When analyzing the decision to open a new branch or use an existing branch, with demand probabilities, the new branch has a higher expected monetary value of 80,000 compared to 52,000 for the existing branch.

Uploaded by

Joia De Leon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views8 pages

Management Science 2

1. Under different criteria for decision making, the document recommends different options for keyboard procurement: manufacturing its own (maximax), buying locally (maximin), buying from Japan (Laplace), or buying from Japan (minimax regret). 2. When considering expected values of different procurement options, buying from Japan has the highest expected value. The expected value of perfect information is 9,000. 3. When analyzing the decision to open a new branch or use an existing branch, with demand probabilities, the new branch has a higher expected monetary value of 80,000 compared to 52,000 for the existing branch.

Uploaded by

Joia De Leon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

1.

a. Manufacturing its own keyboard should be chosen for it has the best payoff (110,000) under
the maximax criterion.
b. Buying from a local manufacturer should be chosen for it has the best payoff (20,000) under
the maximin criterion
c. Buying from Japan should be chosen for it has the highest mean payoff (45,000) under the
LaPlace criterion.
d. Buying from Japan should be chosen for it has the lowest regret (20,000) out of all the worst
regret for each alternative.
2.
a. Expected Value

Manufacture
Buy From
Local
Buy From
Japan

Low

Moderate

High

0.25
-30,000

0.6
20,000

0.15
110,000

20,000

60,000

50,000

48,500

10,000

45,000

80,000

41,500

Expected
Value
21,000

b. The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) is 9,000


3.
High
1

Low

New Branch

0.60

0.40

Decision
0
High

Existing Branch
2

0.55
Low

NEW BRANCH
Terminal Node 3 New Branch; High Demand
Total Cost = 150,000
Total Revenue = 250,000
Total Profit = 100,000
Terminal Node 4 New Branch; Low Demand
Total Cost = 150,000
Total Revenue = 200,000
Total Profit = 50,000

EXISTING BRANCH
Terminal Node 5 Existing Branch; High Demand
Total Cost = 50,000
Total Revenue = 120,000
Total Profit = 70,000
Terminal Node 6 Existing Branch; Low Demand
Total Cost = 50,000
Total Revenue = 80,000
Total Profit = 30,000
Summary Table
Terminal Node
3
4
5
6

Total Profit
100,000
50,000
70,000
30,000

For Node 1, the EMV is given by 0.60(100,000) + 0.40(50,000) = 80,000


For Node 2, the EMV is given by 0.55(70,000) + 0.45(30,000) = 52,000
With the two alternatives, the best one is to open up a new branch with an EMV of 80,000.

4.
4 Low 0.3
5 Moderate
1

0.5

6 High 0.2

Cubao
7 Low 0.3
8 Moderate
0

0.5

9 High 0.2

Gilmore
10 Low 0.3
Makati

11 Moderate 0.5
3

CUBAO BRANCH
Terminal Node 4 Cubao Branch; Low Probability
Total Cost = -75,000
Total Profit = -75,000
Terminal Node 5 Gilmore Branch; Moderate Probability
Total Cost = -85,000
Total Profit = -85,000
Terminal Node 6 Makati Branch; High Probability
Total Cost = -150,000
Total Profit = -150,000

GILMORE BRANCH
Terminal Node 7 Cubao Branch; Low Probability
Total Cost = -100,000
Total Profit = -100,000

12 High

0.2

Terminal Node 8 Gilmore Branch; Moderate Probability


Total Cost = -120,000
Total Profit = -120,000
Terminal Node 9 Makati Branch; High Probability
Total Cost = -150,000
Total Profit = -150,000
MAKATI BRANCH
Terminal Node 10 Cubao Branch; Low Probability
Total Cost = -150,000
Total Profit = -150,000
Terminal Node 11 Gilmore Branch; Moderate Probability
Total Cost = -170,000
Total Profit = -170,000
Terminal Node 12 Makati Branch; High Probability
Total Cost = -200,000
Total Profit = -200,000
Summary Table
Terminal Node
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Total Profit
-75,000
-85,000
-150,000
-100,000
-120,000
-150,000
-150,000
-170,000
-200,000

For Node 1, the EMV is given by 0.3(-75,000) + 0.5(-85,000) + 0.2(-150,000) = -95,000


For Node 2, the EMV is given by 0.3(-100,000) + 0.5(-120,000) + 0.2(-150,000) = -120,000
For Node 3, the EMV is given by 0.3(-150,000) + 0.5(-170,000) + 0.2(-200,000) = -170,000
The lowest cost of business operation is opening a new branch in Cubao with an expected value
of -95,000.

5.
a. Three-Period Weighted Moving Average Forecast
1

35,000

50,000

65,000

55,000

70,000

75,000

69,500

71,250

71,475

10

71,012.5

For Period 7: (55,000*0.2)+(70,000*0.3)+(75,000*0.5) = 69,500


For Period 8: (70,000*0.2)+(75,000*0.3)+(69,500*0.5) = 71,250
For Period 9: (75,000*0.2)+(69,500*0.3)+(71,250*0.5) = 71,475
For Period 10: (69,500*0.2)+(71,250*0.3)+(71,475*0.5) = 71,012.5

b. Four-Period Weighted Moving Average Forecast


1

35,000

50,000

65,000

55,000

70,000

75,000

68,500

69,400

70,310

10

70,144

For Period 7: (65,000*.1)+(55,000*.2)+(70,000*.3)+(75,000*.4) = 66,250


For Period 8: (55,000*.1)+(70,000*.2)+(75,000*.3)+(66,250*.4) = 66,562.5
For Period 9: (70,000*.1)+(75,000*.2)+(66,250*.3)+(66,562.5*.4) = 69,453.1

For Period 10: (75,000*.1)+(66,250*.2)+(66,562.5*.3)+(69,453.1*.4) = 69,316.4

c. Weighted Moving Average


1

35,000

50,000

65,000

55,000

70,000

75,000

73,000

73,800

73,480

10

73,608

For Period 7: (70,000*.4)+(75,000*.6) = 73,000


For Period 8: (75,000*.4)+(73,000*.6) = 73,800
For Period 9: (73,000*.4)+(73,800*.6) = 73,480
For Period 10: (73,800*.4)+(73,480*.6) = 73,608

6.
Month

Demand

Actual Demand

February

200

250

(250*0.30) + (200*(1-0.30)) = 235


March Demand = 215

7.
For alpha = 0.20
(45,000*0.20) + (38,251*(1-0.20)) = 49,601
Period 8 Demand = 39,601
Mean Absolute Deviation = 14,001
Squared Error = 255,489,828
Absolute Percent Error = 31%

Period

Actual

Forecast

Absolute
Deviation

Squared Error

Absolute
Percent
Error

20,000

20,000

0.00%

35,000

20,000

15,000

225,000,000

42.86%

46,000

23,000

23,000

529,000,000

50.00%

40,000

27,600

12,400

153,760,000

31.00%

50,000

30,080

19,920

396,806,400

39.84%

55,000

34,064

20,936

438,316,096

38.07%

45,000

38,251

6,749

45,546,301

15.00%

39,601

14,001

255,489,828

31%

Mean

For alpha = 0.50


(45,000*0.50) + (49,594*(1-0.50)) = 50,000
Period 8 Demand = 47,297
Mean Absolute Deviation = 7,799
Squared Error = 121,566,546
Absolute Percent Error = 18%

Period

Demand

Actual

Absolute
Deviation

Squared Error

Absolute
Percent
Error

20,000

20,000

0.00%

35,000

20,000

15,000

225,000,000

42.86%

46,000

27,500

18,500

342,250,000

40.22%

40,000

36,750

3,250

10,562,500

8.13%

50,000

38,375

11,625

135,140,625

23.25%

55,000

44,188

10,813

116,910,156

19.66%

45,000

49,594

-4,594

21,102,539

-10.21%

47,297

7,799

121,566,546

18%

Mean

You might also like