4 iol
Technical Report
IGEM
For Chartered Membership
To The Institution of Gas Engineers and Managers
Example
DEVELOPMENT OF RISK CONTROL MEASURES
FOR GAS TURBINES USED IN GAS
TRANSMISSION
May 2011Executive Summary
Purpose: This Technical report outlines the eiteon and decision making
pronase developed at Mortat Compressor Station fr National Grid fo measure
{he exicting ventilation system operational efcioncy agalnet the guidance
‘Provided by the HSE atthe time of projet (PM4 2009) It also recognises
‘Previous work and considers the inroducton of, technology enhancements,
Increased efficiency and envionmertal gains, This review agains PMA
Provided a comprehensive risk assessment and demonstrated the use of bt
Practice with assured operational responsibilty.
‘Solution: The guidance in PMB4 was weighted towards the provision ofa
positive alr driven ventilation system for gas turbine enclssues, promoting
positive cooing ar movement over hot surfaces and crecting airflow to areas
‘of ow or poor ventilation, Moat Compressor Stalon was considered high
‘lorty because the existing ventilation system didnot meet tis guidance,
“The other elements considered were to ensure tha the gas turbine coud not
‘operate the venation system failed, and ensure that any potential gas
{aks could not accumulate to an explosive mixture,
Outcome: A tomplato was devised following tis projctthatcutinad a
method of assessing exiting ventilation eystom cperatinal performance. This
template was thon extended tothe rest ofthe National Gilet, A soore card
‘was developed that provided an indication of compliance withthe HSE
{uidance document PMB4, 2003 extending to present standard BS 18021789,
Next steps: As a result of his projet National Gd has evaluated all
‘compressor stations against the sarme measurement crrion an identied
Potential areas of sk that require modification or enhancementContents.
Ewoutve Summary.
10 Contidentalty
2.0 Declaration of authentic...
3.0 Acknowedgements.
‘40 intreduetion,
14.1 Summary of previous work.
4.2 Background to SHAUISR2S leak rates
143 Background tothe PMB4 guidance note
{5.0 The venilation system prior to modication
6.0 Project implementaHOM enn
6.1 Dosign Responsibity.
{6.2 Emironmental best praces.
6.3 Major Mosiicaton...
64 AirFlows,
7.0 Design scope ofthe new ventilation system,
7-1 Fite extinguishing systems.
7.2 Operation ofthe Veration Fens.
17.3 Ventilation Fan fatur,
{8.0 Volume airflow caleultions.
8-1 Gas Leak Calculations,
18
18
48
48
ot£82 Thermal Measurements
90 Conclusions... “
9.1 Project Vestcation
92 Further work
10.0 Supporting Statement
References,
APPENDIX A, Background tothe PMB4 guidance note
[APPENDIX B, General Compressor Station principles of operation
[APPENDIX Engineering solutions.
APPENDIX D, Small Leaks Methodology
APPENDIX , Signed Supporting Statement.
APPENDIX F, Supporting Calculations.
Gas Leak Calculations...
Heat Rejection Calculations.
2
2
26
a
130
a
a
At4.9.Gonfidentialty
‘This report gives a citica insight into the research, design and dovelopment
‘ofa systematic process of improvement mosfcations of a mechanleat
‘entiation system, within a gas turbine enclosure. Tis ventilation eystem ie
used both to dlsperse heat generated by the engine of a gas compressor and
{wo ensure that a small natural gas leaks cannot accumula to pose @
‘sinifcant explosion hazard This report also identifies appropriate research
‘methodologies developed and the evaliation oftheir effectiveness, The
information contained in his repor is commercially sensitve and has to be
lteated as confidential, Naonal Grid has approved the release of this report
ror to submission to GEM.
£2.0.Declaration of Authenticity
| decere thatthe content ofthis report represents an orghal piece of work by
‘nd statemants made within ar tue to the best of my
knowiedge,
‘0 Acknowledgements
| would lke to acknowedge the below people for their cortribution tothe
Moffat PM4 project 2006, leading to this Technical Repet. Asa result the
prejoct sponsor, National Gri can demonsrate Rest comatiance to PMB
2003, and withthe addon of blade containment assessments, compance to
the now standard BS 180 21788.AB Introduetion
“This Technical Report represents a body of work in support of my application
‘or Chartered Membership to the Insttufon of Gas Engineers and Managers
“The development ofthe derived rk corral measures for Gas Turbines were
formed trom the earning and experience gsined from this body of work and
‘subsequent work based on te relerenced technical evaluations mage and
-ppled to Motiat Compressor Station. This project was rterred to asthe
‘Pa Project [27 this name was taken from the guidance docurnent
Produced by the Health and Safety Executive when operating power
generation equipment.
have selected this topic as | hinkitbost eprecons the progres of
techrology and best practice wih tectncal evakations en the development
‘fnew design concepts, This project also considered exiting and emerging
technologie with pay bac in ho form of sfoy bones and eclancy
savings.
‘This Technical Report represents project that had olor ignicant contol
‘over rom year 2004 o commision, testing and proving in year 2008, This
project was considered high ik due to the accumulation of explosive
_tosphores and the consequences of ritoducng buk veblon that can
‘versely increase th sizeof the maximum non-detctasle gas leak win
the cab, The Heath and Safety Exeoutve (HSE) wer inthe process of
introducing risk control measures in power generating plant, str concem of
the rise inthe numberof global incidents. The HSE vista Moffat CompressorStation in your 200220, 0 cary out a Stale Inspect and row othe
‘verlation system, Naona Gd frmaly named Transcx; made a
commitment to misimise the ek an explosive atmosphere haefare fll
tomes Project Manager to cole, evaluate and deveep a range of
‘citions that nat only adresses he business needs, but comid by design
and operation o present guidance and best prac.
in 1970, Bish Gas MRS, cared out a survey of te vertlatlon ofthe Moffat,
compressor encleaur [13]. The ventlaton system was designed to witheraw
‘irom the enclosure, rathor than to blow ar ino the enelosure, A withdrawal
system has several operational dlsadvantages to a postive system. The
atmosphere in the enclosures at a lower pressure than the external a, and
‘may draw into the enclosure any difing gas coud, gene'ated by an external
leak or vent. Also because ofthe lower pressure, there may be cifeutis in
‘pening the doors from the inside of he enclosure, A withdrawal system is
‘alo less efcint in tiring up the atmosphere inside the enclosure,
‘compared with a directs jet produced by a forced ventilation system that
‘blows sir ino the enclosure. tis slso more eifeut to trget portions of the
‘enclosure to recelve a higher air ow a
‘a more uniorm distibution of a.
withdrawal system tends to produce
In November 2001 an ai dstrowon survey was cared at 38), wth the
‘objective of assessing the vontlatonofelency within the enelosure, andthe