Chapter 13/ International Negotiation and Cross-Cultural Communication 103
CHAPTER 13
INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATION AND CROSS-CULTURAL
COMMUNICATION
Learning Objectives
Understand the basics of spoken and nonverbal communication that may influence cross-
cultural management and negotiation
Understand the basic international negotiation processes from preparation to closing the deal
Understand the basic tactics of international negotiation
Be able to recognize and respond to “dirty tricks” in international negotiations
Know the differences between the problems solving and competitive approaches to
international negotiation
Identify the personal characteristics of the successful international negotiator
Introduction
International negotiation is the process of making business deals across national and cultural
boundaries
Without successful negotiation and the accompanying cross-cultural communication, there
are seldom successful business transactions
Successful communication across cultures is a prerequisite for international negotiation
The Basics of Cross-Cultural Communication
Successful communication across cultures is a prerequisite for international negotiation
Mistakes in cross-cultural communication often go unnoticed by the communicator, but they
can still damage international relationships and negotiations
Language and Culture
The interrelationship between language and culture is so strong that some suggest that
language determines the nature of culture - The Whorf hypothesis
According to Whorf, all languages have limited sets of words
These restricted word sets constrain the ability of users to understand or conceptualize the
world
High and Low Context Languages
Low context - people state things directly and explicitly
The words provide most of the meaning
Many Northern European languages including German, English and Scandinavian
languages are low context
High context - people state things indirectly
Communications have multiple meanings that can only be interpreted by reading the
situation in which they occur
Asian and Arabic cultures are the most high context in the world
Exhibit 13.1 Shows a Ranking of Languages by their Degrees of High
and Low Context
104 Section 1/Chapter Outlines
Communication between high and low context individuals is a challenge
Differences in languages that have implications for international negotiations are not limited
to high- and low-context languages
Basic Communication Styles
Communication styles can also affect cross-cultural interactions and negotiations
Direct communication – people speak very directly, to the point
Formal communication – degree of formality expected in interactions
US Americans are among the least formal in communication
Other cultures communicate, especially in business settings, with more formality
Exhibit 13.2 Shows Cultural Differences in Communication Styles
Nonverbal Communication
Means communicating without words
Body movements (called kinesics)
The use of personal space (called proxemics)
Touching
Oculesics (eye contact) and olfactics (smell)
Kinesics
Communicating through body movements
Easy to misinterpret the meanings of body movements in another culture
Facial expressions occur in every human interaction. People smile, frown, squint, sneer, and
engage in a range of facial movements
Body posture relates to the way people stand, walk, and sit. Each culture encourages and
discourages different body postures in different situations
All cultures use hand gestures to embellish and add emphasis to oral communication
Proxemics
How people use space to communicate
The personal bubble of space around each individual may range from nine inches to over
twenty inches
Personal space may also affect the design of offices
Exhibit 13.3 Shows Seating in a Typical Japanese Office
Haptics or Touch, Oculesics and Olfactics
Haptics or touching is communication through body contact
Oculesics refers to communication through eye contact or gaze
Olfactics is the use of smells as a means of nonverbal communication
Haptics or toughing is related to proxemics and is a basic form of human interaction
In greeting one another, people may shake hands, embrace, or kiss
Chapter 13/ International Negotiation and Cross-Cultural Communication 105
Generally, Latin European and Latin American cultures accept more touching than do
Germanic, Anglo, or Scandinavian cultures
The degree of comfort with gaze and eye contact or oculesics also shows significant
variations around the world
106 Section 1/Chapter Outlines
U.S. and Canada, people are very comfortable and expect eye contact to be maintained
for a short moment during conversations
In contrast, China and Japan, eye contact is considered very rude and disrespectful
Different countries have different views of smell or olfactics
U.S. and U.K. tend to be very uncomfortable with body odors
In contrast, Arabs are much more accepting of body odors and consider them natural
Practical Issues in Cross-Cultural Verbal Communication
Cross-cultural negotiations and communications nearly always face a language barrier
An important preparation for any international assignment is gaining at least rudimentary
skills in the local language
Using Interpreters
Provides a simultaneous translation of a foreign language while a person speaks
Requires greater linguistic skills than speaking a language or translating written documents
Use of interpreters may not always means that the intended message is always conveyed
efficiently
Tips to help the U.S. negotiators using interpreters
Spend time with the interpreter so that he/she gets to know your accent and general
approach to conversations
Go over technical and other issues with the interpreter to make sure that they are
properly understood
Insist on frequent interruptions for translations rather than waiting at the end of
statements
Learn about appropriate communication styles and etiquette from your interpreter
Look for feedback and comprehension by watching the eyes
Discuss the message beforehand with the interpreter if it is complex
Request that your interpreter apologizes for your inability to speak in the local language
Confirm through a concluding session with the interpreter that all key components of
the message have been properly comprehended
Communication with Nonnative Speakers
Techniques that make communication easier and more accurate
Use the most common words with their most common meanings
Select words with few alternative meanings
Follow basic rules of grammar strictly
Speak with clear breaks between words
Avoid “sports” words or words borrowed from literature
Avoid words or expressions that are pictures such as “knee deep in the big muddy” in
U.S. English,
Avoid slang
Mimic the cultural flavor of the nonnative speaker’s language
Summarize: Paraphrase and repeat basic ideas
Test your communication success
When your partner doesn’t understand- Repeat the basic ideas using different words
Confirm important aspects in writing
Avoiding Attribution Errors
Attribution is the process by which we interpret the meaning and intent of spoken words or
nonverbal exchanges
Chapter 13/ International Negotiation and Cross-Cultural Communication 107
The main danger in cross-cultural communication comes from the ease of making mistakes
of attribution
108 Section 1/Chapter Outlines
The safest strategy in cross-cultural communication and negotiation begins with observation
and guarded interpretations
International Negotiation
International negotiation is more complex than domestic negotiation
Differences in national cultures, political, legal, and economic systems often make it
necessary to modify negotiation styles to fit the local country
Steps in International Negotiations
The negotiation steps include preparation, building the relationship, exchanging information
and the first offer, persuasion, concessions, agreement, and post agreement.
Exhibit 13.3 Shows the Negotiation Steps
Step 1: Preparation
Winning international negotiation include significant preparation
Experts identify numerous essential questions and these include:
Determine if the negotiation is possible:
Know exactly what your company wants from the negotiation:
Minimally acceptable conditions of an agreement?
Know the other side:
Can the other organization deliver what your company wants?
What are the goals of the other side?
Is the other side dealing with any competitors and do the competitors have any
advantages?
Send the proper team:
Do the negotiators have the appropriate knowledge of the technical details, sufficient
negotiation experience, language abilities, and knowledge of the country and its culture?
Have they prepared as a team?
What authority do they have?
Agenda:
Is there an agreed upon agenda?
Can it lead somewhere the company does not want it to go?
Prepare for a long negotiation:
This avoids being rushed to accept a disadvantageous solution
Know when you must leave but don’t tell the other side
Environment:
Is the team familiar with the physical environment where the negotiations with take
place? When will the team arrive? What support is necessary on site? What is the
language of negotiation? Are interpreters necessary?
Strategy
Plan a strategy but remain flexible. What are the principal issues? What are the
opening moves?
Understand other negotiation cultural issues
Negotiation goal -signing contract or forming the relationship
Personal style - formal or informal
Communication styles—direct or indirect
Sensitivity to time—low or high
Forms of agreement—specific or general
Chapter 13/ International Negotiation and Cross-Cultural Communication 109
Exhibit 13.4 Shows Cultural Differences in Preferences for General
Agreements
Team organization - a team or one leader
Attitude towards negotiation - win-lose or win-win
High or low emotions - societies differ in terms of acceptability and appropriateness of
display of emotions
Exhibit 13.5 Contrasts Some Common U.S. Negotiation
Characteristics with Those from Other National Cultures
Team organization—a team or one leader
Step 2: Building the Relationship
Do not focus on business matters - but concentrate on social and interpersonal matters
Develop social and interpersonal relationships
Duration and importance vary by country
Building a good relationship among negotiating parties provides foundation for working out
eventual deal
Step 3: Exchanging Information and the First Offer
Parties exchange task-related information
Pertains to actual detail of the proposed agreement
Both sides usually present first offer – this is their first proposal and what they expect from
the agreement
Exhibit 13.6 Shows a Comparison Among Different Nations
Regarding Information Exchange and First-Offer Strategies
Step 4: Persuasion
Persuasion - stage where each side attempts to get the other side to agree to their terms
Verbal and Nonverbal Negotiation Tactics
Promise: If you do something for me, I will do something for you
Threat: If you do something I don’t like, I will do something you don’t like
Recommendation: If you do something I desire, good things will happen to you (e.g.,
People will buy your product)
Warning: If you do something I don’t like, bad things will happen for you (e.g., Other
companies will know you can not do business here)
Reward: I am going to do something beneficial for you (without conditions)
Punishment: I am going to do something you will dislike—without conditions (e.g., end
the negotiations immediately)
Normative appeal: This is the way we do or do not do business here (e.g., “You must
learn the Japanese way”)
Commitment: I agree to do something specific (e.g., Meet a delivery date)
Self-disclosure: I will tell you something about myself or my company to show you why
we need to close the deal
Question: I ask you something about your company or yourself
110 Section 1/Chapter Outlines
Command: This is an order that you must follow
Chapter 13/ International Negotiation and Cross-Cultural Communication 111
Refusal: Just saying no
Interrupting: I talk when you talk
Exhibit 13.7 Shows Examples of Cultural Differences in these Verbal
Negotiating Tactics Among Japanese, U.S., and Brazilian
Negotiators
Cultural differences in nonverbal communication styles also influences negotiations
Nonverbal communication through such things as body posture, facial expression, hand
gestures, and the use of personal space are a natural part of any international negotiation
“Dirty Tricks” in International Negotiations
“Dirty tricks” are negotiation tactics that pressure opponents to accept unfair or undesirable
agreements or concessions
Some examples of common ploys in international negotiations (that some may consider dirty
tricks) follow, with possible response tactics
Deliberate deception or bluffing: Negotiators present flagrant untruths either in the facts
they present or in their intentions for the negotiation
o Possible response: Point out directly what you believe is happening
Stalling: Negotiators wait to the last minute before the international negotiation team
plans to go home. They then push for quick concessions to close the deal
o Possible responses: Do not reveal when you plan to leave. When asked, say “as long
as it takes.” Alternatively, state when you will leave with or without the deal
Escalating authority: Negotiators make an agreement then reveal that it must be
approved by senior managers or the government. The objective is to put the other team
under psychological pressure to make more concessions
o Possible response: Clarify decision making authority early in the negotiation process
Good-guy, bad-guy routine: One negotiator acts agreeable and friendly while his or her
partner makes outrageous or unreasonable demands. The “good guy” suggest that only a
small concession will appease the unreasonable “bad guy”
o Possible response: Do not make any concessions. Ignore the ploy and focus on
mutual benefits of the potential agreement
You are wealthy and we are poor: Often used by negotiators from developing countries,
this tactic attempts to make concessions seem trivial. Smaller companies may also use
this tactic when dealing with larger companies
o Possible response: Ignore the ploy and focus on mutual benefits of potential
agreement
Old friends: Negotiators act as if the companies and their negotiators have long
enduring friendships. They feign hurt feelings if their partners disagree or do not bow
to their requests
o Possible response: Keep a psychological distance that reflects the true nature of the
relationship
Steps 5 and 6: Concessions and Agreement
Final agreement - is the signed contract, agreeable to all sides. It must be consistent with the
chosen legal system or systems
Concession making requires that each side relax some of its demands to meet the partner’s
needs
It usually means giving in on the points of lessor importance to you to achieve your major
objectives in negotiating the potential deal
North American negotiators
112 Section 1/Chapter Outlines
Take a sequential approach to concession making - consider each issue as a separate
point
Chapter 13/ International Negotiation and Cross-Cultural Communication 113
Each side reciprocates concessions made by the other side - expect each side to give and
take on the individual issues in sequence
Holistic approach
More common in Asia
Each side makes very few, if any, concession during discussions of each point in a
potential agreement
After all participants discuss all issues can concession-making begin
Basic Negotiation Strategies
Competitive negotiating – each side tries to give as little as possible
The negotiation as a win-lose game
Begin with high and often unreasonable demands
Make concessions only grudgingly
Use dirty tricks and any plot that leads to their advantage
Problem solving negotiation
Search for possible win-win situations
Defending their company’s position not the major goal of the negotiation
Seek out mutually satisfactory ground that is beneficial to both companies’ interests
Avoid dirty tricks and use objective information whenever possible
Exhibit 13.8 Summarizes and Contrasts How the Competitive
Negotiator and the Problem-Solving Negotiator Differ in their
Approaches
Exhibit 13.9 Shows Some Recent Evidence from a Cross-National
Study on Cultural Differences in the Preference for a
Problem-Solving Negotiation Style
Step 7: Post Agreement
The post agreement phase consists of an evaluation of the success of a completed negotiation
The post agreement stage can be very beneficial as it allows garnering of valuable insights
into the strengths and weaknesses of the approach that was used during the negotiation
By analyzing the various steps, the negotiators can determine where things went well
and where improvements are needed
Beyond information critical to learning, post agreement can also allow a negotiating
team to further develop a closer relationship with their counterpart
How can learning be enhanced during the post agreement stage?
A formal training process: if companies are serious about learning from negotiations,
they should invest in training those involved in negotiations
Analogical approaches: based on analysis of multiple cases and require participants to
compare several situations to find commonalities
After negotiators have concluded a deal, they can compare their experiences with previous
negotiations to better grasp the lessons from their experiences
The Successful International Negotiator: Personal Characteristics
Tolerance of ambiguity:
Even if they are familiar with the culture of their counterpart, an international
negotiator is still a cultural bridge between national cultures and organizational cultures
Flexibility and creativity:
The international negotiator must expect that unexpected
114 Section 1/Chapter Outlines
Explicit goals for the outcome may not work
Humor:
Situations arise in intercultural exchanges that are sometimes embarrassing or
humorous
Stamina:
Long travel, jet lag, different foods, different climates, hotel living, and culture shock
stress the physical stamina of even experienced international negotiators
Empathy:
Empathy means putting yourself in the place of your foreign colleagues—understanding
the world from their perspective
Curiosity:
Managers with a genuine curiosity and respect concerning other cultures often discover
subtitles that a more task oriented negotiator misses
Bilingual:
Knowing the partner’s language is an asset. However, sometimes language ability alone
is not enough
Steps in, and Styles of Negotiation, and the Successful Negotiator:
Summary Observations
(1) Few negotiations succeed without extensive preparation, both for the technical details of the
potential relationship and for dealing with people bringing different cultural backgrounds to
the negotiation process
(2) Building personal relationships is a key step in negotiation the world. U.S. Managers weak
on this step
(3) First offers may differ by cultural background and managers must be aware of how their
offers are viewed by people from other cultures
(4) There are many tactics in persuasion. Some of these may be considered dirty tricks
(5) The processes surrounding giving and receiving concessions may be viewed quite differently
by people from different nations
(6) Culture and legal traditions influence the content and force of law regarding business
contracts
(7) Competitive negotiation, with its use of dirty tricks and rigid positions, seldom leads to long
term relationships
(8) Problems solving negotiation is more flexible and probably a more successful strategy for the
international negotiator
(9) Individuals who engage in international negotiations must be flexible, empathetic and
physically tough
Summary and Conclusions
The negotiating process involves preparation, building relationships with counterparts,
persuading others to accept your reasonable goals through verbal and nonverbal negotiating
tactics, making concessions, and finally, reaching an agreement
Successful negotiators prepare well, understand the steps in the negotiation processes, and
avoid the use of dirty tricks and competitive negotiating strategies
Successful negotiators are bilingual and have good cross-cultural communication skills
Oral cross-cultural communication demands that one learn the language or use interpreters
Nonverbal communications through body movements, proxemics, and touching vary widely
for different cultural groups
Avoiding attribution errors is a key to cross-cultural communication