CHAPTER – II
DATA ANALYSIS AND ITERPRETATION
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
Table no 2.1 showing age of the respondents
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
below20 8 8 8 8
20-25 30 30 30 38
Valid 25-30 33 33 33 71
30-35 21 21 21 92
above35 8 8 8 100
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey 8% of employees are below 20, while 30% of employees at the
age of 20 – 25, and 33% at the age of 25 – 30, 21% at the age of 30 – 35, 8% of employees age
are above 35.
Chart no 2.1.a showing age of the employees
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
male female Total
Valid
Table no 2.2 showing gender of the employees
male 70 70 70 70
Valid female 30 30 100
30
Total 100
100 100
Interpretation
There are 70 male workers and 30 female workers.
Chart no 2.2.a showing gender of the employees
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4
male female Total
Table no 2.3 showing marital status of the employees
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
married 56 56 56 56
Valid unmarried 44 44 44 100
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
There are 56 male employees and 44 unmarried employees.
Chart no 2.3.a showing marital status of the employees
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
married Valid unmarried Valid Total
Table no 2.4 showing monthly salary of the employees
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
below9k 3 3 3 3
9k-18k 50 50 50 53
18k-27k 39 39 39 92
27k-36k 7 7 7 99
Valid
36k&above I 1 1 100
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
There are three workers getting below 9k, while 50 employees get between 9k-18k, and
39 employees between 18k-27k, while 7 employees get between 27k-36k and 1 employee get
above 36k.
Chart no 2.4.a showing monthly salary of the employees
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
below9k
9k-18k
18k-27k
27k-36k
36k&above
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CumulativePercent
Table no 2.5 showing educational qualification of the employees
Valid
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Percent
ITI , Diploma 26 26 26 26
UG 32 32 32 58
PG 24 24 24 82
Valid others 18 18 18 100
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey 26 employees have studied ITI & Diploma, while 32 employees
studied UG (Under Graduate), and 24 employees studied PG (Post Graduate), while 18
employees studied other courses.
Chart no 2.5.a showing educational qualification of the employees
120
100
80
60
40
20
0 ITI&Diolomo UG PG others Valid Total
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CumulativePercent
Table no 2.6 showing the number of years of work experience employees have
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
below1 year 6 6 6 6
20 20 20 26
valid 1 to 2years
2 to 3years 28 28 28 54
3 to 4years 20 20 20 74
above4years 26 26 26 100
100 100 100
total
Interpretation
According to my survey less than 1 year 6 employees, 1 – 2years 20 employees, 2 – 3
years 28 employees, and above 5 as 26 employees.
Chart no 2.6.a showing the number of years of work experience the employees have
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
below 1 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 above 4
valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent
Table no 2.7 showing how long have employees been working in STG
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Less than
19 19 19 19
6months
1-2years 40 40 40 59
Valid 2-3years 17 17 17 76
3-4years 9 9 9 85
above
15 15 15 100
5years
Total
100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my analysis less than 6 months 19 employees, 1 – 2 years 40 employees, 2 –
3 years 17 employees, 3 – 4 years 9 employees, above 5 years 15 employees.
Chart no 2.7.a showing how long have employees been working in STG
100
80
60
CurrulativePerc…
40 ValidPercent
20 Percent
Frequency
0
lessthan 1-2years 2-3years 3-4years above Total
6months 5years
Valid
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CurrulativePercent
Table no 2.8 showing whether respondents are planning to retain their services in the same
organization in the future.
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent
Percent Percent
agree 96 96 96 96
disagree 4 4 4 100
Valid
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey 96 employees have agreed and 4 employees have disagreed to
work in STG.
Chart no 2.8.a showing whether respondents are planning to retain their services in the
same organization in the future.
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Frequercy Percent ValidPercent CurrulativePercent
agree Valid disagree Valid Total
Table no 2.9 showing respondents who have agreed to retain their job and how long
Valid
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Percent
Less
than 6 1 1 1 1
months
1-2years 22 22 22.9 24
2-3years 17 17 17.7 41.7
3-4years 17 I7.0 17.7 59.4
Above
39 39 40.6 100
5years
Valid Total 96 96 100
Missing System 4 4
Total 100 100
Interpretation
According to my analysis less than 6month one employee, 1 – 2 years 22 employees, 2 – 3
years 17 employees, 3 – 4 17 employees, above 5 years 39 employees, while 4 employees
disagreed to retain their job.
Chart no 2.9.a showing respondents who have agreed to retain their job and how long
120 120
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
lessthan6months
1-2years
3-4years
Total
2-3years
above5 vears
System
Valid Missing
Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent
Table no 2.10 showing pace of work in an organization enables a person to do a good job
Valid
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Percent
Strongly Agree 23 23 23 23
Agree/Mostly 26 26 26 49
Neutral/Partly 21 21 21 70
Disagree 25 25 25 95
Strongly
Valid 5 5 5 100
Disagree
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my analysis strongly agree 23 employees, agree 26 employees, neutral/partly
21 employees, disagree 25 employees, strongly 5 employees.
Chart no 2.10 showing pace of work in an organization enables a person to do a good job
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
StronglyAgree Agree/Mostly Neutral/Partly Disagree StronglyDisagree Total
Valid
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CumulativePercent
Table no 2.11 showing will be an increase in turnover
Valid
Valid Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Percent
Strongly Agree 14 14 14 14
Agree/Mostly 26 26 26 40
Neutral/Partly 33 73
33 33
Disagree 12 12 12 85
15 15 100
Strongly Disagree 15
Total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 14 employees, agree 26 employees neutral/partly
33 employees, disagree 12 employees, strongly disagree 15 employees.
Chart no 2.11.a showing will be an increase in turnover
250
200
150
100
50
0
Agree/Mostly
Neutral/Partly
Total
StronglyAgree/Alwavs
StronglyDisagree/Nota
Disagree/Tosomeexten
tall
t
Valid
Frequency Percent ValidPercent CumulativePercent
Table no 2.12 showing training given for the employees are helpful
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 25 25 25 25
agree 28 28 28 53
neutral/partly 24 24 24 77
disagree 15 15 15 92
strongly disagree 8 8 8 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my analysis strongly agree 25 employees, agree 28 employees,
Neutral/partly 24 employees, disagree 15 employees, strongly disagree 8 employees.
Chart no 2.12.a showing training given for the employees are helpful
total
strongly disagree
disagree
neutral/partly
agree
strongly agree
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
Table no 2.13 showing sufficient salary details of the respondent
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 8 8 8 8
agree 28 28 28 36
neutral/partly 33 33 33 69
disagree 23 23 23 92
strongly disagree 8 8 8 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my analysis strongly agree 8 employees, agree 28 employees,
Neutral/partly 33 employees, disagree 23 employees, strongly disagree 8 employees.
Chart no 2.13.a showing sufficient salary details of the respondent
15
17
25
100
32
11
strongly agree agree neutral/partly disagree strongly disagree total
Table no 2.14 showing value for the work of the respondent
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 13 13 13 13
agree 16 16 16 29
neutral/partly 21 21 21 50
disagree 42 42 42 92
strongly disagree 8 8 8 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 13 employees, agree 16 employees,
Neutral/partly 21 employees, disagree 42 employees, strongly disagree 8 employees.
Chart no 2.14.a showing
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
strongly agree agree neutral/partly disagree strongly disagree total
Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
Table no 2.15 showing supportive and friendly workers
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 17 17 17 17
agree 22 22 22 39
neutral/partly 30 30 30 69
disagree 20 20 20 89
strongly disagree 11 11 11 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 17 employees, agree 22 employees,
Neutral/partly 30 employees, disagree 20 employees, strongly disagree 11 employees.
Chart no 2.15 showing supportive and friendly workers
total
strongly disagree
disagree
neutral/partly
agree
strongly agree
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
cumulative percent valid percent percent Frequency
Table no 2.16 showing if the respondents give back their allowances to firm
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 16 16 16 16
agree 28 28 28 44
neutral/partly 21 21 21 65
disagree 25 25 25 90
strongly disagree 10 10 10 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 16 employees, agree 28 employees,
Neutral/partly 21 employees, disagree 25 employees, strongly disagree 10 employees.
Chart no 2.16 showing if the respondents give back their allowances to firm
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
strongly agree agree neutral/partly disagree strongly disagree total
Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
Table no 2.17 showing respondent satisfaction with their job
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 15 15 15 15
agree 32 32 32 47
neutral/partly 22 22 22 69
disagree 21 21 21 90
strongly disagree 10 10 10 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 15 employees, agree 32 employees,
Neutral/partly 22 employees, disagree 21 employees, strongly disagree 10 employees.
Chart no 2.17 showing respondent satisfaction with their job
total
strongly disagree
disagree
neutral/partly
agree
strongly agree
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
Table no 2.18 showing respondent satisfied with welfare facility
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 11 11 11 11
agree 17 17 17 28
neutral/partly 32 32 32 60
disagree 29 29 29 89
strongly disagree 11 11 11 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 11 employees, agree 17 employees,
Neutral/partly 32 employees, disagree 29 employees, strongly disagree 11 employees.
Chart no 2.18 showing respondent satisfied with welfare facility
32 11
25 111
100
17
15
strongly agree agree neutral/partly disagree strongly disagree total
Table no 2.19 showing respondent can understand how he/she role contributes to achieving
business outcome
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 15 15 15 15
agree 24 24 24 39
neutral/partly 26 26 26 65
disagree 25 25 25 90
strongly disagree 10 10 10 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 15 employees, agree 24 employees,
Neutral/partly 26 employees, disagree 25 employees, strongly disagree 10 employees.
Chart no 2.19 showing respondent can understand how he/she role contributes to achieving
business outcome
250
200
150
100
50
0
strongly agree agree neutral/partly disagree strongly disagree total
Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
Table no 2.20 showing respondent satisfied with job family/personal responsibilities
Valid Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
strongly agree 15 15 15 15
agree 17 17 17 52
neutral/partly 25 25 25 57
disagree 32 32 32 89
strongly disagree 11 11 11 100
total 100 100 100
Interpretation
According to my survey strongly agree 15 employees, agree 17 employees,
Neutral/partly 25 employees, disagree 32 employees, strongly disagree 11 employees.
Chart no 2.20 showing respondent satisfied with job family/personal responsibilities
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly agree agree neutral/partly disagree strongly total
disagree
Frequency percent valid percent cumulative percent
