Mathematical Economics
Hasin Yousaf
Week 1
Equilibrium Analysis, Linear Models and Matrix Algebra
Organizational Issues
Course Staff:
• Lecturer: Hasin Yousaf
Email: [email protected]
Office Hours: Wednesday 14:00 to 16:00 - QUAD 3120
• Tutor:
Organizational Issues
References:
• The website for this course is on UNSW Moodle at:
http://moodle.telt.unsw.edu.au
• The required textbook for this course:
• Alpha C. Chiang, Kevin Wainwright, Fundamental Methods of
Mathematical Economics, McGraw-Hill Education, 4th ed. 2005
• Other recommended textbooks:
• Simon, Carl P., Lawrence Blume, Mathematics for Economists, W.
W. Norton, 1994.
• Klein, W. Michael, Mathematical Methods for Economics, Addison
Wesley, 2002.
Organizational Issues
Assessments:
• Two assignments (Week 3 and 8) → 20%
• Mid-Session Exam (100 minutes, Week 5) → 30%
• Final Exam (120 minutes, University Exam Period) → 50%
Mathematical Economics?
• The purpose of this course is to provide you with a working knowl-
edge of the mathematical tools used in economic analysis.
Partial Market Equilibrium - A Linear Model
Consider the so-called partial equilibrium model, i.e. a model of price
determination in an isolated market. To construct the model, the
following elements are required:
• Variables
– Quantity demanded of the commodity (Qd )
– Quantity supplied of the commodity (Qs )
– Price of the commodity (P )
• Equilibrium Condition
– Quantity demanded equals quantity supplied (Qd = Qs )
• Behavioural Equations
– Qd is a decreasing function of P Qd = a − bP (a, b > 0)
– Qs is an increasing function of P Qs = −c + dP (c, d > 0)
Partial Market Equilibrium - A Linear Model
Graphical Solution
Qs = −c + dP (Supply)
a Qd = a − bP (Demand)
Q∗ = Q∗d = Q∗s (P ∗ , Q∗ )
0 P
P∗
-c
Partial Market Equilibrium - A Linear Model
Analytical Solution
In equilibrium, quantity demanded equals quantity supplied. Let
Q = Qd = Qs . Rewrite the model equivalently as:
(
Q = a − bP
Q = −c + dP
Solving these two equations in two variables gives the solution:
a+c
P∗ =
b+d
∗ ad − bc
Q =
b+d
Note that to be economically meaningful, the model should contain the
additional restriction that ad > bc.
Click for Detailed Solution
Partial Market Equilibrium - A Nonlinear Model
Now let the linear demand in the isolated market model be replaced by
a quadratic demand function. To construct the model, the following
elements are required:
• Variables
– Quantity demanded of the commodity (Qd )
– Quantity supplied of the commodity (Qs )
– Price of the commodity (P )
• Equilibrium Condition
– Quantity demanded equals quantity supplied (Qd = Qs )
• Behavioural Equations
– Qd is a decreasing function of P 2 Qd = 4 − P 2
– Qs is an increasing function of P Qs = 4P − 1
Partial Market Equilibrium - A Nonlinear Model
Graphical Solution
Q
Qs = 4P − 1 (Supply)
Q∗ = Q∗d = Q∗s (1,3)
Qd = 4 − P 2 (Demand)
P
-2 0 P∗ 2
-1
Partial Market Equilibrium - A Nonlinear Model
Analytical Solution
In the view of equating Qd and Qs by the equilibrium condition, let
Q = Qd = Qs . Rewrite the model equivalently as:
(
Q = 4 − P2
Q = 4P − 1
Solving these two equations in two variables gives the quadratic
equation:
P 2 + 4P − 5 = 0
The two solutions are: P1∗ = 1 and P2∗ = −5. But, only the first is
economically admissible, as negative prices are ruled out.
Given the equilibrium price P ∗ = 1, the equilibrium quantity is given
by
Q∗ = 3
Click for Detailed Solution
General Market Equilibrium
• A more realistic depiction of the demand and supply functions
of a commodity should take into account the effect not only of
the price of the commodity itself, but also of the prices of related
commodities.
• When several interdependent commodities are simultaneously con-
sidered, equilibrium would require that quantity demanded equals
to quantity supplied for each and every commodity included in the
model.
Qdi = Qsi for i = 1, 2, ..., n
• The solution will then consist of a set of prices Pi∗ and correspond-
ing quantities Q∗i such that all commodities’ markets will be in
equilibrium.
Two-Commodity Market Model
Consider a simple model in which only two commodities are related to
each other. To construct the model, the following elements are
required:
• Variables
– Quantity demanded of each commodity (Qd1 and Qd2 )
– Quantities supplied of each commodity (Qs1 and Qs2 )
– Price of each commodity (P1 and P2 )
• Equilibrium Condition
– Quantity demanded equals quantity supplied of each commodity
(Qd1 = Qs1 and Qd2 = Qs2 )
• Behavioural Equations
– Qd1 = a0 + a1 P1 + a2 P2 and Qd2 = α0 + α1 P1 + α2 P2
– Qs1 = b0 + b1 P1 + b2 P2 and Qs2 = β0 + β1 P1 + β2 P2
Two-Commodity Market Model
Analytical Solution
In the view of equating Qd and Qs by the equilibrium condition, let
Q1 = Qd1 = Qs1 and Q2 = Qd2 = Qs2 . Rewrite the model equivalently
as:
(
(a0 − b0 ) + (a1 − b1 )P1 + (a2 − b2 )P2 = 0
(α0 − β0 ) + (α1 − β1 )P1 + (α2 − β2 )P2 = 0
Solving these two equations in two variables gives the equilibrium
prices:
c2 γ0 − c0 γ2
P1∗ =
c1 γ2 − c2 γ1
c0 γ 1 − c1 γ 0
P2∗ =
c1 γ2 − c2 γ1
where ci = ai − bi and γi = αi − βi (i = 0, 1, 2)
Click for Detailed Solution
Equilibrium in National-Income Analysis
Consider the simple Keynesian national-income model:
Y = C + I0 + G0
C = a + bY (a > 0, 0 < b < 1)
where Y and C stand for endogenous variables national income and con-
sumption expenditure, respectively. I0 and G0 represent the exogenously
determined investment and government expenditures.
Solving these two equations in two variables gives the equilibrium
national income and consumption expenditure:
a + I0 + G0
Y∗ =
1−b
a + b(I0 + G0 )
C∗ =
1−b
The restriction b 6= 1 is necessary to ensure the denominator is non-zero.
Since b, the marginal propensity to consume is assumed to be a positive
fraction, this restriction is automatically satisfied.
Click for Detailed Solution
Linear Models and Matrix Algebra
• So far, the models we have considered are relatively simple, even
though a number of parameters are involved.
• As more and more variables (e.g. commodities) are incorporated
into the model, the solution methods we have considered quickly
become cumbersome and unwieldy.
• One method which is suitable for handling a large system of simul-
taneous equations is matrix algebra.
• Matrix algebra
– provides a compact way of writing an equation system;
– leads to a way of testing the existence of a solution;
– gives a method of finding the solution (if it exists).
Matrices as Arrays
Definition: Matrix
An m × n matrix is a rectangular array with m rows and n
columns:
a11 a12 · · · a1n
a21 a22 · · · a2n
A = [aij ]m×n = .
.. .. ..
..
. . .
am1 am2 ··· amn
The number of rows and the number of columns in a matrix together
define the dimension of the matrix. Since the matrix A in the definition
contains m rows and n columns, it is said to be of dimension m × n.
In the special case where m = n, the matrix is called a square matrix.
Matrices as Arrays
Definition: Linear System
A linear system of n equations and n unknowns
a11 x1 + a12 x2 + · · · + a1n xn = d1
a21 x1 + a22 x2 + · · · + a2n xn = d2
.. .. .. ..
. . . .
an1 x1 + an2 x2 + · · · + ann xn = dn
can be written in the form Ax = d where
a11 a12 · · · a1n x1 d1
a21 a22 · · · a2n x2 d2
A= . .. , x = .. , d =
.. .. ..
..
. . . . .
an1 an2 · · · ann xn dn
Matrices as Arrays
For example, the following system of equations
x1 + 2x2 − x3 =4
3x1 + 5x2 =5
−x1 − 3x2 + 6x3 =7
can be written in the form Ax = d where
1 2 −1 x1 4
A= 3 5 0 , x = x2 , d = 5
−1 −3 6 x3 7
Vectors as Special Matrices
Definition: Column Vector
A column vector is an m × 1 matrix, i.e. a matrix with only one
column:
x1
x2
xm×1 = .
..
xm
Definition: Row Vector
A row vector is an 1 × n matrix, i.e. a matrix with only one row:
x1×n = x1 x2 . . . xm
5
For example, x2×1 = is a column vector.
12
For example, x1×4 = 2 6 8 1 is a row vector.
Matrix Operations
Definition: Matrix Addition
The sum of two m × n matrices A = [aij ]m×n and B = [bij ]m×n
is the component-wise sum:
a11 + b11 ··· a1n + b1n
a21 + b21 ··· a2n + b2n
A+B = (aij )m×n +(bij )m×n =
.. .. ..
. . .
am1 + bm1 ··· amn + bmn
The sum of matrices is defined if an only if they have the same
dimension, i.e. the matrices should be conformable for addition.
For example,
3 4 −1 0 3−1 4+0 2 4
6 7 + 6 5 = 6 + 6 7 + 5 = 12 12
−1 3 −1 3 −1 − 1 3 + 3 −2 6
Matrix Operations
Definition: Matrix Subtraction
The difference of two m × n matrices A = [aij ]m×n and B =
[bij ]m×n is the component-wise difference:
a11 − b11 · · · a1n − b1n
a21 − b21 · · · a2n − b2n
A−B = (aij )m×n −(bij )m×n =
.. .. ..
. . .
am1 − bm1 · · · amn − bmn
The difference of matrices is defined if an only if they have the same
dimension, i.e. the matrices should be conformable for subtraction.
For example,
19 3 6 8 19 − 6 3−8 13 −5
− = =
2 0 1 3 2−1 0−3 1 −3
Matrix Operations
Definition: Scalar Multiplication
The product of an m × n matrix A = [aij ]m×n with a scalar
r ∈ R is the component-wise multiplication:
ra11 · · · ra1n
ra21 · · · ra2n
rA = (raij )m×n = .
.. ..
.. . .
ram1 ··· ramn
For example,
3 2 2×3 2×2 6 4
1 6 2×1 2×6 2 12
2 = =
7 3 2×7 2 × 3 14 6
8 −2 2×8 2 × −2 16 −4
Matrix Operations
Definition: Matrix Multiplication
The product of an m × n matrices A = [aij ]m×n and an n × p
matrix B = [bij ]n×p is the m × p matrix C = [cij ]m×p whose
element in the ith row and the j th column is the product on the
ith row of A and the j th column of B. That is,
n
X
cij = air brj = ai1 b1j + ai2 b2j + · · · + ain bnj
r=1
The product AB is defined only if the number of columns of the matrix
A is equal to the number of rows of the matrix B.
For example,
1 3 1(5) + 3(9) 32
2 8 × 5 = 2(5) + 8(9) = 82
9
4 0 4(5) + 0(9) 20
Matrix Operations
Exercise
Let
3 5 1 2 1
1
A= 2 1 ,B = 4 7 ,C = ,D = 0
3
6 0 0 3 0
Compute each of the following matrices, if defined.
(i) (A + D)C
(ii) (A − B)C
(iii) (A + B)D
Click for Detailed Solution
Commutative, Associative and Distributive Laws
Theorem: Matrix Addition Laws
If A, B, and C are matrices with dimension m × n such that the
given operations are defined, then the basic properties of matrix
addition are:
• Commutative Law A+B =B+A
• Associative Law (A + B) + C = A + (B + C)
Commutative, Associative and Distributive Laws
Theorem: Matrix Multiplication Laws
If A, B, and C are matrices whose dimensions are such that the
given operations are defined, then the basic properties of matrix
multiplication are:
• AB 6= BA except in special cases.
• AB = 0 does not imply that A or B is 0.
• AB = AC and A 6= 0 do not imply that B = C
• Associative Law (AB)C = A(BC)
• Left Distributive Law A(B + C) = AB + AC
• Right Distributive Law (A + B)C = AC + BC
Linear Dependence
Definition: Linear Dependence
A set of vectors v1 , ..., vn is said to be linearly dependent if and
only if one of the vectors can be written as a linear combination
of the others.
The vectors are linearly independent if none of the vectors can
be written as a linear combination of the others.
2 1 4
For example, the three vectors v1 = , v2 = , and v3 =
7 8 5
are linearly dependent because v3 is a linear combination of v1 and v2 .
6 2 4
3v1 − 2v2 = − = v1 = = v3
21 16 5
The last equation is alternatively expressible as 3v1 − 2v2 − v3 = 0
Linear Dependence
Theorem: Linear Dependence
Consider a set of vectors v1 , ..., vn and scalars k1 , ..., kn . These
vectors are linearly independent if and only if
k1 v1 + k2 v2 + ... + kn vn = 0
has a unique solution given by k1 = k2 = ... = kn = 0.
The vectors are linearly dependent if and only if there exists
k1 , ..., kn with at least one ki 6= 0 for i = 1, ..., n.
Exercise
1 1 1
Show that v1 = −1 , v2 = 0 , v3 = −2 are linearly
0 1 −1
dependent.
Click for Detailed Solution
Detailed Solutions
Substitute the first equation into the second equation
a − bP = −c + dP
Rearrange to have P on one side of the above equation
(b + d)P = a + c
The result is the solution for equilibrium price P ∗
a+c
P∗ =
b+d
To find the equilibrium quantity Q∗ , substitute P ∗ into either demand
or supply equation.
(a + c) a(b + d) − b(a + c) ad − bc
Q∗ = a − b = =
b+d b+d b+d
Go Back
Theorem: Quadratic Equation
Given a quadratic equation of the form
ax2 + bx + c = 0
there are two roots, which can be obtained from the quadratic
formula √
∗ ∗ −b ± b2 − 4ac
x1 , x2 =
2a
For the equation P 2 + 4P − 5 = 0, the two roots are given as
√
∗ ∗ −4 ± 16 + 20
P1 , P2 = = 1, −5
2
To find the equilibrium quantity Q∗ , substitute the positive P ∗ into
either demand or supply equation.
Q∗ = 4 × 1 − 1 = 3
Go Back
Let ci = ai − bi and γi = αi − βi (i = 0, 1, 2), then the system of
two equations can be rewritten as
(
c1 P1 + c2 P2 = −c0
γ1 P1 + γ2 P2 = −γ0
From the first equation, it can be found that P2 = −(c0 + c1 P1 )/c2 .
Substituting this into the second equation and solving gives
c2 γ0 − c0 γ2
P1∗ =
c1 γ2 − c2 γ1
From the second equation, it can be found that P1 = −(γ0 + γ1 P1 )/γ2 .
Substituting this into the first equation and solving gives
c0 γ1 − c1 γ0
P2∗ =
c1 γ2 − c2 γ1
Note that we must require the common denominator to be nonzero, i.e.
c1 γ2 6= c2 γ1 .
Go Back
Substitute the second equation into the first equation to reduce the
system into a single equation in one variable, Y.
Y = a + bY + I0 + G0
(1 − b)Y = a + I0 + G0
The result is the solution value of equilibrium national income Y ∗
a + I0 + G0
Y∗ =
1−b
To find equilibrium consumption expenditure C ∗ , substitute Y ∗ into
the consumption equation
b(a + I0 + G0 ) a + b(I0 + G0 )
C ∗ = a + bY ∗ = a + =
1−b 1−b
Go Back
(i) Since A is a 3 × 2 matrix and D is a 3 × 1 matrix, (A + D)C is not
defined.
(ii)
3 5 1 2
1
(A − B)C = 2 1 − 4 7
3
6 0 0 3
2 3
1
= −2 −6
3
6 −3
(2)(1) + (3)(3)
= (−2)(1) + (−6)(3)
(6)(1) + (−3)(3)
11
= −20
−3
(iii) (A + B) is a 3 × 2 matrix and D is a 3 × 1 matrix. Since the number
of columns of (A + B) is not equal to the number of rows of D ,
(A + B)D is not defined.
Go Back
Consider the equation
k1 v1 + k2 v2 + k3 v3 = 0
1 1 1 0
k1 −1 + k2 0 + k3 −2 = 0
0 1 −1 0
which can be written as
k1 + k2 + k3 =0
−k1 − 2k3 =0
k2 − k3 =0
The third equations implies that k2 = k3 and substitution reduces
the first and second equations to k1 + 2k2 = 0 which can be solved
by k2 = −1/2 and k1 = 1. Therefore, the system can be solved by
k = (1, −1/2, −1/2). Therefore, the vectors are linearly dependent.
Go Back