18

Chapter Three

Methodology

This chapter discusses the methodology used in this research. This chapter

consists of five parts. The first is research design. The second is research

participants and settings. The third is data gathering instrument. The fourth is data

gathering procedure. The fifth is data analysis.

Research Design

The purposes of this research are to explore the factors which inhibit the

students at higher education to communicate with native English speakers and to

find out the strategies to deal with the inhibiting factors to communicate with

native English speakers. Based on those objectives, the researcher used qualitative

method. The researcher applied qualitative method in order to get more

information from the students’ experience. According to Creswell (2012),

qualitative has characteristics for describing and developing more detail on a

specific phenomenon.

The researcher used descriptive qualitative as a research design for

gathering the data. According to Creswell (2012) descriptive qualitative design is

applicable to facilitate deeper information of the participants experience.

Therefore, the researcher chose descriptive qualitative design, because it is able to

explore the information from the participants experience related to the

phenomenon.
 19

Research Setting and Participants

This part discusses the information related to participants and setting of

the research. In research setting, the researcher explained where and when the

research was conducted while in research participants, the researcher explained

the people who got involved in this study. The explanations are presented as

follows:

Research setting. This research was conducted at English Language

Education Department at a private university in Yogyakarta. There are some

reasons of choosing this university as the setting. Firstly, this university provides

some courses related to speaking skills and one of them focuses in communicating

with English native speakers, such as English for Tourism and Listening and

Speaking for Daily Conversation. Secondly, most of the students at this

department still have inhibiting factors to communicate with native English

speakers based on the researcher prior observation. It can be seen from the fact

that some students felt frightening to communicate with native English speakers.

Thirdly, the researcher was currently studying at this university, so it eased the

researcher to collect the data using interview. This research was conducted on July

2018.

Research participants. The participants of this research were English

department student’s batch 2015 at private university in Yogyakarta. Student’s

batch 2015 have learned English for more than two years, and they have

experience to communicate using English language both in classroom and out of

the classroom.
 20

There are some criteria for the participants of the research. The first is the

participants have learned English language more than two years. Therefore, the

students already know the communication knowledge toward English language.

The second is the participants have experience to communicate with native

English speakers. It is based on their experience so the participants know more

about the obstacle that they face when they communicate with native English

speakers. The third is the participants have willingness to communicate with

native English speakers. The researcher wanted to know that the participants

wanted to improve and develop their communication skill toward native English

speakers. Finally, four students of batch 2015 became the participants in this

research. All of the participants in this research were female students. In order to

ensure the anonymity, the researcher changed the participants’ names into Sky,

Aurora, Tiera, and Snow. The researcher told the participants that their identity

were presented in pseudonym.

The first participant was Sky. She was in seventh semester. She had

experience in communicating with native English speakers in formal setting. She

wanted to be able to communicate with native English speakers in informal

setting, but she faced some inhibiting factors hampering her to start

communicating with native English speakers. The second participant was Aurora.

She was in seventh semester. She had enough experience in communicating with

native English speakers, because she lived around a tourism place. In addition, she

had communicated with native English speakers since in junior high school. The

third participant was Tiera. She was in seventh semester. She ever communicated
 21

with native English speakers twice. She wanted to communicate with native

English speakers again, but she had inhibiting factors obstructing her willingness.

The fourth participants was Snow. She was in seventh semester. She

communicated with native English speakers in formal setting. She explained that

at that time she was not be able to have long conversation with native English

speakers. She felt that she faced some inhibiting factors threatening her to

communicate with native English speakers.

Data Collection Method

The method used by the researcher was interview. By using interview

method the researcher can get the data more detail and deeper. Cohen, Manion,

and Morison (2011) said that interview is a technique to gather or collect the data.

Interview becomes a flexible tool to collect the data from the participants, because

the participants will answer the question based on their perception so that the

researcher will get deep information. According to Cohen et al. (2011), the

interview is a flexible tool for collecting the data which involves multi-sensory

channels like verbal, non-verbal, spoken, and heard.

The researcher used standardized open-ended interview where the

researcher already has the topic and the outline. Based on Cohen, Manion, and

Morrison (2011), data are complete for each participant on the topics addressed in

the interview. The researcher also used open-ended items for interview structure.

By using open-ended interview, the participants are free to answer the question,

because there is no limitation. The participants also have flexibility to answer the

question and express their idea. According to Cohen, Manion, and Morrison
 22

(2011), open-ended items are no other restrictions on either the content of the

interviewee’s reply or interviewee’s ideas. Thus, the information collected will be

more detail and comprehensive based on the participants’ experience.

The instrument of the research is the interview guideline. The interview

guideline consisted of questions related to the inhibiting factors becoming

obstacle in communicating with native English speakers and the strategies to cope

with those factors. The researcher used indirect format as interview guideline. By

using indirect format the participants answered the question more likely to

produce honest and open respons. According to Tuckman (1972) indirect format

is ask interviewee by their own views (as cited Cohen, Manion, and Morrison

2011, p. 417). It helped the researcher get deeper information from the

participants. This research also used unstructured response mode as the

participants’ response. The participants could share anything in their experience

clearly. According to Tuckman (1972), unstructured response allows the

participants to give her answer whatever they will share (as cited Cohen, Manion,

and Morrison 2011, p. 419).

Data Gathering Procedure

There are several steps to gather the data in this study. Firstly, the

researcher began to prepare the interview guidelines. Secondly, the researcher

tried to find the right participants based on certain criteria. Then, the researcher

gave an explanation about this study in the beginning of recruitment. Thirdly, the

researcher made an appointment with the participants. Fourthly, the participants

answered researcher’s questions. During the interview, the researcher used

Indonesian language to make the participants easy in understanding and

answering the questions. The researcher did this so that the participants gave the

information freely and honestly. Dealing with the appointment of schedule, the

researcher focused on time, place and tools used in the interview process. The

interview process will be recorded using mobile phone. The length of the

interview in this research was around 20 minutes for each participant.

Data Analysis

The thematic content analysis used to analyze the interview data. There

were several steps of this analysis method, such as transcription, member

checking, and coding.

The first step is transcribing the recorded interview. Cohen, Manion, and

Morrison (2011), transcribing means writing down the participants said in order to

get the participants’ answer. In transcribing step, the researcher listen to the

recorded. Then, the researcher changed the voice recorded interview into written

form. The researcher also used Indonesian language in transcribed result.

Then, the next step was member checking. In this step, the researcher did

member checking to the participants’ answers. According to Carlson (2010),

member checking is to increase the trustworthiness and for avoiding the setting

and triggering of such traps. In member checking, the researcher asked and cross

checked to the participants dealing with accuracy of the answer. The researcher

also asked the participants related to the answer that still confusing or did not

answer the research question.Therefore, the result from the member checking the

researcher found the error transcribing, so that the researcher revise the transcript
 24

accordance with what the participants explain. The researcher did member

checking to Snow. Before member checking, Snow mentioned that the strategy

that she used was read an article in English language. Nevertheless, the researcher

do not understand for what a strategy was done. Then, Snow explain more that by

read an article in English language she will improve her vocabulary, grammar,

and enrich the knowledge about the culture of the target language.

After did member checking, the researcher analyzed the data using coding.

Coding was a name or label to a piece of text. Cohen et al. (2011) defined that

coding was a simply a name or label that the researcher gives to a piece of text

that contains on idea or s piece of information. Then, by Kerlinger (1970)

defined coding as a translation of question responses and respondent information

to specific categories for the purpose of analysis (as cited in Cohen et.al. 2011,

p.559). Based on Flick (2009), some kinds of coding are an open coding,

analytical coding, an axial code, and a selective coding (as cited in Cohen et.al.

2011, p.561).

The researcher used four types of coding that are open coding, analytical

coding, axial coding, and selective coding to analyze the data. The first type was

open coding. In open coding, the researcher gave a new label or name to a piece

of text, and generated category to the students answer. The second type step was

analytical coding. The researcher analyzed the answer and broke down data into

smaller units or segments. Then, the researcher translated the participants

answer. Next, the resercher gave theme or topic and changed into English

language becuase in interview was using Bahasa. The third type was axial
 25

coding. The researcher analyzed using a similar meaning and made a connection

between smaller unit of similar findings or theme into one category. Then, the

researcher made two categories, namely inhibiting factors and strategies to cope

with those factors.The fourth type was selective coding. Selective coding was

similar with axial coding. Selective coding was used to identify the core theme

or findings of data and select the similar meaning into one finding. After

finishing doing coding, the researcher got the results of this research.
26