Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views4 pages

Analysis I Combined

This document discusses several concepts related to analysis including power series, the intermediate value theorem, and the fundamental theorem of calculus. It provides proofs for these theorems and answers additional questions. Examples and counterexamples are given to illustrate different cases.

Uploaded by

coty mari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views4 pages

Analysis I Combined

This document discusses several concepts related to analysis including power series, the intermediate value theorem, and the fundamental theorem of calculus. It provides proofs for these theorems and answers additional questions. Examples and counterexamples are given to illustrate different cases.

Uploaded by

coty mari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

4D Analysis I

Find the radius of convergence of each of the following power series.


X
(i) n2 z n
n>1

Known (Ratio Test): If n an z n is a power series with an 6= 0 for all


P
n, and there exists l ∈ [0, ∞] such that |an+1 /an | → l as n → ∞, then
the radius of convergence is 1/l ∈ [0, ∞].
(i) Use the ratio test with an = n2 . We have for all n that
[3] |an+1 /an | = (1 + 1/n)2 → 1 as n → ∞. So radius of convergence is 1.
X 1/3
(ii) nn z n
n>1

n is a power series with n |a | → l


P p
Known (Root Test): If n an z n
as n → ∞ for some l ∈ [0, ∞], then the radius of convergence is
1/l ∈ [0, ∞].
1/3
(ii) Take an = nn . We have for all n that
2/3
|an | = nn = e(log n)/n
p
n −2/3
.

And for all α > 0 we have


log n
→0

as n → ∞. (To see this, note that for all α, n > 0 we have
1
nα = eα log n > α2 (log n)2 .)
2
Since exp is continuous, we get
2/3
e(log n)/n →1

[7] as n → ∞, so by root test radius of convergence is 1.


[10]

10E Analysis I
State and prove the Intermediate Value Theorem.

IVT: If f : [a, b] → R is continuous and c ∈ R is such that f (a) 6 c 6


f (b) or f (b) 6 c 6 f (a) then there exists x ∈ [a, b] with f (x) = c.
Proof: WLOG f (a) 6 c 6 f (b). Let S = {t ∈ [a, b] : f (t) 6 c}. This is
non-empty (contains a) and bounded above (by b) so has a supremum
s. We claim f (s) = c.
Well, if f (s) > c then by continuity of f there exists δ > 0 such
that [s − δ, s] ⊂ [a, b] and f |[s−δ,s] > c, so s − δ is an upper bound for S
which is strictly less than s—contradiction.
Similarly if f (s) < c then there exists δ > 0 sch that [s, s + δ] ⊂
[a, b] and f |[s,s+δ] < c so s + δ ∈ S, contradicting the fact that s is an
upper bound for S.
[5] Thus f (s) = c, so we can take x = s. 
A fixed point of a function f : X → X is an x ∈ X with f (x) = x. Prove that every
continuous function f : [0, 1] → [0, 1] has a fixed point.

Consider the function g : [0, 1] → R given by g(t) = f (t) − t. This is


continuous and satisfies g(0) = f (0) > 0 and g(1) = f (1) − 1 6 0, so
[4] by IVT there exists x ∈ [0, 1] with g(x) = 0, i.e. f (x) = x.
Answer the following questions with justification.
(i) Does every continuous function f : (0, 1) → (0, 1) have a fixed point?

[2] (i) No. f (x) = x2 .


(ii) Does every continuous function f : R → R have a fixed point?

[2] (ii) No. f (x) = x + 1.


(iii) Does every function f : [0, 1] → [0, 1] (not necessarily continuous) have a fixed
point?

(iii) No. (
1 x=0
f (x) =
0 x > 0.
[2]
(iv) Let f : [0, 1] → [0, 1] be a continuous function with f (0) = 1 and f (1) = 0. Can
f have exactly two fixed points?

(iv) Yes. Take f to be piecewise linear with the following graph

y
1 y=x

y = f (x)

0 1 x
[5]
[20]
12D Analysis I
State and prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

FTC: If f : [a, b] → R is continuous then the function F : [a, b] → R


defined by Z t
F (t) = f (x) dx
a
is differentiable on (a, b), and one-sided differentiable at a and b, with
derivative f .
Proof: Fix t ∈ [a, b]. We need to show that

F (x) − F (t)
→ f (t)
x−t
as x → t in [a, b]. Well, take x ∈ [a, b] not equal to t; WLOG t < x.
Then
1 x
Z Z t Z x
F (x) − F (t)
− f (t) =
f (y) dy − f (y) dy − f (t) dy
x−t |x − t| a

a t
1 x
Z

= f (y) − f (t) dy
|x − t| t
Z x
1
6 sup |f − f (t)| dy
|x − t| t [t,x]
= sup |f − f (t)|
[t,x]

→0

as x → t, since f is continuous. So F is right-differentiable on [a, b)


[9] (and similarly left-differentiable on (a, b]) with derivative f . 
Rx
Let f : [0, 1] → R be integrable, and set F (x) = 0 f (t) dt for 0 < x < 1. Must F
be differentiable?

No. Take (
−1 x 6 1/2
f (x) =
1 x > 1/2.
This is clearly integrable, with F (x) = |x − 1/2| − 1/2, which is not
[4] differentiable at 1/2.
Let f : R → R be differentiable, and set g(x) = f ′ (x) for 0 6 x 6 1. Must the
Riemann integral of g from 0 to 1 exist?

No. Take (
x2 sin x12 x 6= 0
f (x) =
0 x = 0.
This is differentiable at 0, with derivative 0, since |f (x)| 6 |x|2 for all
x (so |f (x)/x| → 0 as x → 0). Clearly differentiable away from 0, with
derivative
1 2 1
g(x) = 2x sin 2 − cos 2
x x x
by the chain rule. This is unbounded on (0, 1], so not Riemann
[7] integrable.
[20]

You might also like