Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views7 pages

Midterm 2 Solutions

The document contains solutions to problems from a Math 478: Analysis I midterm exam, covering key theorems such as the extreme value theorem, intermediate value theorem, inverse function theorem, Taylor's theorem, and Riemann integrability. Each problem includes statements of theorems and proofs demonstrating various properties of continuous and differentiable functions. The solutions provide rigorous mathematical arguments and examples to illustrate the concepts discussed.

Uploaded by

fzsjpxuwfm8279
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views7 pages

Midterm 2 Solutions

The document contains solutions to problems from a Math 478: Analysis I midterm exam, covering key theorems such as the extreme value theorem, intermediate value theorem, inverse function theorem, Taylor's theorem, and Riemann integrability. Each problem includes statements of theorems and proofs demonstrating various properties of continuous and differentiable functions. The solutions provide rigorous mathematical arguments and examples to illustrate the concepts discussed.

Uploaded by

fzsjpxuwfm8279
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

MIDTERM 2 SOLUTIONS

MATH 478: ANALYSIS I

Problem 1. (a) (1 point) State the extreme value theorem.

Let M be a compact metric space and f : M → R a continuous function.


Then, f is bounded on M and attains its maximum and minimum values.

(b) (1 point) State the intermediate value theorem.

Let M be a connected metric space and f : M → R a continuous function.


If y ∈ R and f (a) > y and f (b) < y for some a, b ∈ M , then there exists x ∈ M
with y = f (x).

1
2

(c) (3 points) Prove that if f : [a, b] → R is continuous, f ([a, b]) is a closed bounded
interval.

Proof. Since [a, b] is compact and f : [a, b] → R continuous, the extreme value
theorem ensures f ([a, b]) has minimum and maximum values, say c and d, re-
spectively. Hence,
f ([a, b]) ⊂ [c, d].
Now let x1 , x2 ∈ [a, b] with f (x1 ) = c and f (x2 ) = d. Since [a, b] is connected, if
y ∈ [c, d], then there exists x ∈ [a, b] with f (x) = y. That is,

[c, d] ⊂ f ([a, b]).

Hence, f ([a, b]) = [c, d], and the proof is done. 


3

Problem 2. (a) (1 point) State the inverse function theorem.

Let f : (a, b) → (c, d) be a differentiable surjection such that, for each x ∈


(a, b), f 0 (x) 6= 0. Then, the inverse function f −1 : (c, d) → (a, b) is differentiable
on (c, d) and
1
(f −1 )0 (y) = 0 −1
f (f (y))
for each y ∈ (c, d).

(b) (3 points) Let q ∈ N. Prove using the inverse function theorem or the
1
definition of the derivative that f (x) = x q is differentiable on (0, ∞) and that
1 1
f 0 (x) = x q −1 .
q
d n
(You are allowed to use the fact that dx
x = nxn−1 for natural numbers n.)

Proof. We can use the inverse function theorem. Let g : (0, ∞) → (0, ∞) be
given by g(y) = y q and note f = g −1 . We know already that

g 0 (y) = qy q−1 6= 0

for each y > 0. Hence, by the inverse function theorem, f is differentiable and
1 1 1 1
f 0 (x) = = 1 = x q −1 .
g 0 (f (x)) q(x )q−1
q q


4

Problem 3. (a) (1 point) State Taylor’s theorem with the Lagrange form of the
remainder.

Let f : (a, b) → R be (n + 1)-times differentiable, let x0 , x ∈ (a, b). Then,


there exists t between x0 and x for which
n
X f (k) (x0 ) f (n+1) (t)
f (x) − (x − x0 )k = (x − x0 )n+1 .
k=0
k! (n + 1)!

(b) (3 points) Suppose that f : (a, b) → R is f is twice-differentiable and f 00 ≥ 0 on


(a, b). Show that f lies above each of its tangent lines.

Proof. Fix x0 , x ∈ (a, b). Then, there exists t between x0 and x for which

f 00 (t)
f (x) − f (x0 ) − f 0 (x0 )(x − x0 ) = (x − x0 )2 ≥ 0.
2
Hence,
f (x) ≥ f (x0 ) + f 0 (x0 )(x − x0 ).
In other words, the graph of f lies above its tangent line based at x0 for each
x0 ∈ (a, b). 
5

Problem 4. (3 point) Let f : [a, b] → R be a bounded function. Prove that

sup L(f, P ) ≤ inf0 U (f, P 0 ),


P P

where the supremum and infimum are taken over partitions P and P 0 of [a, b].

Proof. Fix a partition P . For any partition P 0 , monotonicity yields

L(f, P ) ≤ L(f, P ∪ P 0 ) ≤ U (f, P ∪ P 0 ) ≤ U (f, P 0 ).

Hence L(f, P ) is a lower bound for {U (f, P 0 ) : partitions P 0 }, and hence

L(f, P ) ≤ inf0 U (f, P 0 ).


P

Since this holds for each P , inf P 0 U (f, P 0 ) is an upper bound for {L(f, P ) :
partitions P }, and so
sup L(f, P ) ≤ inf U (f, P ).
P P


6

Problem 5. (a) (1 point) State what it means for f : [a, b] → R to be Riemann


integrable over [a, b] with integral I.

For each  > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that for each partition pair P, T of
[a, b],
mesh P < δ implies |R(f, P, T ) − I| < .

(b) (3 points) Suppose a < c < b, let f : [a, b] → R is a Riemann integrable function
over [a, b], and suppose g : [a, b] → R satisfies f (x) = g(x) for each x 6= c. Prove
directly from the definition of the Riemann integral that g is integrable on
[a, b] and
Z b Z b
g(x) dx = f (x) dx.
a a

Proof. We first fix a partition pair P, T and bound


|R(g, P, T ) − R(f, P, T )|
in terms of the mesh of P . Let
P = {x0 , . . . , xn } and T = {t1 , . . . , tn }
as usual and let K be the set of all indices k for which tk = c. Note, K may
contain at most two indices (and exactly two indices only when c = xk for some
k ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1} and tk = tk+1 = xk ). We have
n
X n
X
|R(g, P, T ) − R(f, P, T )| = f (tk )(xk − xk−1 ) − g(tk )(xk − xk−1 )
k=1 k=1
Xn
= (f (tk ) − g(tk ))(xk − xk−1 )
k=1
X
= (f (c) − g(c))(xk − xk−1 )
k∈K
X
≤ |f (c) − g(c)|(xk − xk−1 )
k∈K
≤ 2(mesh P )|f (c) − g(c)|.
7

Next, let Z b
I= f (x) dx
a

and fix  > 0. Since f is integrable over [a, b], there exists δ > 0 such that

mesh P < δ implies |R(f, P, T ) − I| < .
2
Hence if  

mesh P < min δ, ,
4|f (c) − g(c)|
we have
 
|R(g, P, T ) − I| ≤ |R(g, P, T ) − R(f, p, T )| + |R(f, p, T ) − I| < + = .
2 2


You might also like