Sauer Failure
Sauer Failure
AU: Furrer RE
Date: 06/28/2007
Abs: A set of Sauer-Danfoss gear pumps was sent from H&HS to TC-G for product
evaluation. A test matrix was developed and two pumps were tested per this
regime (113cc/rev & 81cc/rev). A noise/sound evaluation was then done on one
pump (113cc/rev; CPA1007 #1). These results are contained REDI Document
No. DN1052829, 2007. A cyclic endurance test was run on this same pump; the
intention was to endurance test for 1 million cycles. However, a cracked cover
developed and terminated testing at 310,000 cycles. Following this event,
another Sauer-Danfoss pump of the same displacement and configuration
(CPA1007 #2) was performance tested and then endurance tested, using the
same parameters. The outlet port threads, on the flange port adaptor, fatigued
and failed at 750,000 cycles. Also, a similar crack to the first failure was found in
the cover of this unit. It was not determined if this crack had not broken through
to the exterior of the part, due to the condition of the facility after the outlet flange
failure. Both pumps endurance tested had material failures that led to test
termination.
Retention: Indefinite
NOTE:
Author: Furrer RE
Introduction:
A set of gear pumps was provided for evaluation at TCG. The primary objectives were to
determine the key operating efficiencies (volumetric, mechanical, and overall) as well as the
sound/noise characteristics and the endurance life of the pump. This information was to be used
as part of product review for purchase, or manufacture.
Objectives:
1. Discover & report any design related issues encountered that require discussions with
Sauer-Danfoss.
2. Determine the overall operating efficiency for this pump. This would also require
determining the other primary efficiencies (volumetric and mechanical) as part of the
process.
3. Determine the noise characteristics for this pump. This work was done by Yuanhong
Guan and is covered by REDI Report DN1052829, 2007.
4. Determine if the pump could withstand 1 million endurance cycles at 22,700 kPa.
Conclusions:
1. The load seal design arrangement would seem to present several opportunities for
improvement. Also, the pump assembly bolting arrangement would also present
opportunities for improvement.
2. The average efficiencies, at 93°C fluid temperature, were actually very good for a gear
pump product. Overall efficiencies averaged from 60% (1000rpm/18000kPa) to 80%
(2000rpm/24,820kPa). Drawing specific conclusions relative to efficiency are difficult
due to the issues surrounding the load seal extrusion seen. The results provided above
appear to be higher than what experience would indicate to be normally expected for a
gear pump. All instrument calibration was checked before, and after testing, and found
to be within specification limits. Future test data used for comparison to this data, on this
same series of pumps, should keep this information in mind.
3. Noise/Sound work was conducted by Yuanhong Guan and the finding are reported in
another report (REF: REDI Report DN1052829, 2007)
4. Neither of the pumps that were endurance tested survived the prescribed 1 million
cycles. The endurance results were as follows:
a. CPA1007 (#1)- Completed 310,000 cycles at 21,500 kPa, at which point the cover
developed a crack that permitted external leakage. Testing was then terminated on
this pump
b. CPA1007 (#2)- Completed 750,000 cycles at 21,500 kPa, at which point the cover
flange threads fatigued and cover developed a crack. Testing was then terminated
on this pump.
Recommendations:
1. Discussions should be held on how the seal arrangement, load seal assembly, and bolt
assembly methodology, can be improved. Also, suggest that consideration be given to a
fixed low speed (600rpm) /high load pressure (24820kPa) bearing endurance be
conducted following a successful cyclic endurance test. (These issues have been
discussed, and a molded load seal design is now being considered. Also, validation
testing is being planned that will encompass the low speed bearing testing.)
2. Recommendations on improving the pump efficiency are hard to determine at this point.
Due to the issues surrounding the load seal, it makes evaluating the mechanical
efficiency results especially difficult. (Since this issue is included in the load seal design,
a new design seal and validation testing will address this issue also.)
3. Sound/Noise recommendations are deferred to Yuanhong Guan and his report.
4. Suggest consideration be given to changing the flange and cover material to iron (of
appropriate grade and section) in place to the aluminum that is currently in use. The
cover cracks and thread failures seen on the endurance tests would be eliminated. (This
has been discussed, and changing to an iron material for the components mentioned, is
planned when pump is resourced to China. Validation of this material is also being
planned as part of the overall plan.)
Significant Results:
1. There was an issue with stability when pump was run under load speed (below
1500rpm) and high load pressure (above 15000kPa) conditions.
2. The average overall efficiencies, at 93°C fluid temperature, were as follows:
CPA1007 (#1)
1000rpm/18000kPa 2000rpm/24,820kPa
a. Volumetric 63.9% 83.0%
b. Mechanical 94.5% 96.6%
c. Overall 60.4% 80.2%
CPA1007 (#2)
1000rpm/18000kPa 2000rpm/24,820kPa
d. Volumetric 85.3% 88.4%
e. Mechanical 96.9% 95.6%
f. Overall 82.6% 84.6%
CPA1025
1000rpm/18000kPa 2000rpm/24,820kPa
g. Volumetric 69.3% 81.0%
h. Mechanical 97.3% 89.0%
r. Overall 67.4% 72.0%
3. The load seal and load seal back-up design appears to have been a contributor the
instability at low speed/high load situation. During teardown inspection, it was found that
loading was not constrained to the normal loading area, but across the entire face of the
load plate. This was thought to be a result of the load seal extruding underneath the
plate. The purpose of the load seal is to confine pressure to a design limited area, and
when it fails, this area is greatly increased. The result is overloading of the load plate on
the internal pump gears.
4. In all of the pumps examined, the load seal had extruded. This situation appeared to be
related to the backing material and the assembly method used.
5. Also noticed in all pumps were assembly paint marks on all main bolts. This indicates
that there may have been concern with making sure that all bolts had proper torque
applied. This method/design of providing clamp load to the pump could present
assembly issues in making sure that adequate torque is applied to the individual
fasteners. This is a concern when this methodology is still being used on a mature
product.
6. Significant low speed testing could not be accomplished, to determine bearing life, due
to the load stability issues mentioned.
7. The assembly of the pump was difficult due to the clamp bolt arrangement. A wrench
and socket are required to provide assembly torque.
8. Inconsistent wear seen on gear teeth of CPA1007 (#1) after endurance test teardown
inspection. This appears to be from a geometry error in gear manufacturing.
9. High loading of shaft seal onto output drive shaft seen after teardown inspection of
CPA1007 (#1). No leakage noticed at the shaft/seal interface, but the endurance test
only ran 31% of required cycles.
10. Condition of shaft journals, and bearings, on CPA1007 (#2) were in surprising good
condition, even though exposed to a water/oil fluid mixture, high temperature, and
apparently ran for several minutes without fluid in the reservoir. Photos are attached in
report body.
Randall E. Furrer
881-01, Hydraulic Component Development, TCG
(309) 578-8559
Discussion:
A set of pumps was delivered to TCG to evaluate as part of product review for a potential
manufacturing venture with Sauer Danfoss. This evaluation was to include performance testing,
endurance testing and an evaluation of the overall worthiness of the pump package. Originally,
this testing was designated to run on TCG Facility 202-2E (Figure 13/IM&TE), which is a constant
200HP dynamometer. During the course of running the first pump, CPA1007, it was determined
that torque limitations existed with this facility that didn’t allow completion of this work. So, a larger
facility, 208-1S, was selected and the pump was mounted on it per the schematic below (Figure
1). Instruments were installed to measure the critical performance parameters per the attached
IM&TE listing below for TCG 208-1S (Figure 2). Photographs were taken of the pump installed on
both facilities (TCG 202-2E & 208-1S; Figures 3-5) and are also attached below.
Performance testing was conducted after this without any interruptions. Data has been tabled and
is attached below (Figures 6-7). Endurance testing was done, on this pump, only on TCG Facility
208-1S. A trace of the pressure, for the endurance test, is also attached below (Figure 8). This
pump survived at total of 310,000 cycles before a crack in the aluminum cover created an external
leak, and the test was terminated. The cover was Xyglo checked for crack examination. This
method shows the location and the extent of the crack involved, but the best results are usually
seen with ferrous materials. This cover is aluminum, so the results were not optimal. Photos were
taken after this work to document the crack/cover condition, and are included below. (Figures 14-
15) Also, photographs taken of the other major internal components, during the teardown
inspection, are included (Figures 16-35).
Another pump, CPA1025, was also installed on TCG Facility 202-2E. This pump’s performance
testing was done almost exclusively on this facility. However, the low speed (below 1500rpm) and
high load pressure (above 18000kPa) conditions would cause the dynamometer to stall. This also
indicated an overdraw torque condition, which this pump shouldn’t have been able to do. After
seeing the load seal failures that occurred in the previous test pump, it was decided that the pump
was overloaded and requiring greater than expected drive torque. It is for this reason that this
pump was also moved to TCG Facility 208-1S (600HP) and was retested at the low speed/high
load pressure conditions. The data that was taken, while installed on 202-2E, is tabled below.
(Figure 12)
After failing the endurance unit, CPA1007 (#1), it was decided that another pump would be
endurance tested. The pump selected was the same as the first endurance unit, CPA1007, and
will be designated in this report as CPA1007 (#2). This unit was performance tested prior to being
endurance tested also, and the results are below (Figure 9-10). Upon completion of the
performance work, this pump was endurance tested using the same test regime as the first. The
representative endurance test cycle was captured and is below (Figure 11). This second pump
was to be run for 1 million cycles, but it only completed 750,000 cycles. At that point, the outlet
port threads fatigued and allowed the outlet port flange to separate. This separation provided an
opening for the test fluid (SAE10W; CT5347-USED IN ALL TESTING DONE) to escape, and
eventually drain the reservoir before the facility could be shutdown. It should be mentioned that
the draining of the reservoir created high internal temperatures, and due to the facility sprinkler
system being set-off, water ingestion into the hydraulic system was the eventual result. This
combination of high temperature, and an oil/water mix, is usually fatal for pump components.
However, the bearings and shafts of this pump looked to be in reasonable condition. Though
blued, due to the high temperature, the shafts were not badly scored. The bearings still had the
original “orange-peel” texture to the inside diameter surface. They had also seen high
temperature, but had not degraded to any great amount visually. Due to the catastrophic nature of
the failure, a major external leakage created by fatigued threads, the testing was terminated. Most
of the internal seals were melted, due to the high internal temperatures mentioned, seriously
damaged, or compromised. Photos were not taken of the internal seals for this pump (CPA1007-
#2); most of the major components were photographed and are below (Figures 36-57).
Another item that should be discussed is the cover of the second endurance unit (CPA1007 #2).
Even though the outlet port fatigue was the root cause of the failure, it was decided to die
penetrant check this cover to determine if any cracks were present. The results were surprising in
that a crack was occurring, and it was located in the same location as the previous failure. Also,
the length of the crack appeared to be approximately the same length as the crack in the previous
failure. Photos were taken and are installed below, both by with this cover by itself, and with the
previous cover for comparison (Figures 40-44).
Figure 5. CPA 1007 Installation on TCG Facility 208-1S (Shown w/Sound Measuring Instruments)
Figure 5
Figure 6. Output Flow versus Speed Data (Derived Displacement)- CPA1007 (#1)
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 9. Output Flow versus Speed Data (Derived Displacement)- CPA1007 (#2)
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figures 14-15. CPA1007 (#1) -Photograph of Cover Crack (Xyglo Results)- After 310,000 cycles
Figure 14.
Figure 15.
Figure 16. CPA 1007 (#1) –“As Removed” from Facility 208-1S after Endurance Testing
Figure 16.
Figure 17. Photograph of Pump Disassembly –As the Cover & Gear plate is Lifted
Figure 17.
Figure 18.
Figure 20-21. CPA1007 (#1)-Additional Photos of the Cover Side Loadplate – After Endurance
Figure 22. CPA1007 (#1)-Cover Side Plate Close up- After Endurance
Inlet Core
Figure 23. CPA1007 (#1)- Extruded Load Seal/Cover Area- After Endurance
Figure 23.
Figure 26.
Figure 29. CPA1007 (#1) - Load Seal Back-Up- After Endurance (Close-Up)
Figure 29.
Figure 30. CPA1007 (#1)- Load Seal Back-Up- After Endurance (Close-up & Removed from
Groove)
Figure 30.
Figure 31.
Both photos are showing the inlet side of the gearplate, and the
contact area with the gears. Contact appeared heaviest in this local
but wasn’t usual for pumps of this type from this observer’s POV.
Figure 35. CPA1007-Post Endurance- Close-up Photo Showing Shaft Seal Bearing Area
Figure 35.
Figure 36.
Figure 37. Installed Pump on TCG Facility 208-1S –Photo Showing Fatigued Outlet Port
Threads/Extrusion Gap
Figure 37.
Figures 38-39. Photos Showing Close-up of Extrusion Gap Created by Fatigued Outlet Flange
Threads
Figure 38 Figure 39
Figure 40
This crack was found upon disassembly of pump. Though the primary failure of the pump was the
outlet port thread fatigue, this cracked also developed. It would have also lead to an eventual
failure. The thinking is that this crack was subsurface during the operation of the pump, and then
opened when the threads failed. The thread failure, and the corresponding extrusion gap, through
which the facility reservoir was drained, resulted in very high internal temperatures. This additional
increase in temperature is thought to be what caused the crack to open at this point.
CPA1007 –
#2 Endurance
Unit
Figure 41
CPA1007 –
#1 Endurance
Unit
Figure 42
Figures 43-44. Failed Covers/Both Units –Covers Rotated for Crack Comparison
CPA1007 –
#1 Endurance
Unit
CPA1007 –
#2 Endurance
Unit
Figure 44
Figure 46
Thread material
columns were
moving out of the
cover, and the clamp
load originally
provided by the
flange bolts was
non-existent
Figure 47
Thread columns
separating from
main cover casting
Figure 48
Figures 49-50. CPA1007 (#2)- Load Plate & Shaft Journal Condition – After Endurance
Figure 49
It should be noticed
that the condition of
the shaft journals
was reasonably
good considering
the exposure to high
temperatures.
Figure 50
Figures 51-52. Internal Part Condition at Test Termination – CPA 1007 (#2)
Figure 52
Figures 53-54. Internal Part Condition at Test Termination – CPA 1007 (#2)
Figure 54
Figures 55-56. Drive Gear Journal Condition at Test Termination - CPA 1007 (#2)
Figure 56
Figure 57