Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
249 views6 pages

Heat Exchanger Calculations

The document provides information and analysis for several heat exchanger problems involving concepts like effectiveness-NTU method, heat transfer rate calculations, and fouling factor determination. Problem 11.18 involves finding the required length and degraded performance after 3 years for a counterflow heat exchanger. Problem 11.28 examines the area, heat recovery rate, and annual energy/fuel cost savings for a regenerator with specified effectiveness. Problem 11.64 asks to determine maximum heat transfer rate and effectiveness and preferred operation mode for a concentric tube exchanger.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
249 views6 pages

Heat Exchanger Calculations

The document provides information and analysis for several heat exchanger problems involving concepts like effectiveness-NTU method, heat transfer rate calculations, and fouling factor determination. Problem 11.18 involves finding the required length and degraded performance after 3 years for a counterflow heat exchanger. Problem 11.28 examines the area, heat recovery rate, and annual energy/fuel cost savings for a regenerator with specified effectiveness. Problem 11.64 asks to determine maximum heat transfer rate and effectiveness and preferred operation mode for a concentric tube exchanger.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

PROBLEM 11.

9
KNOWN: Operating conditions and surface area of a finned-tube, cross-flow exchanger.
FIND: Overall heat transfer coefficient.
SCHEMATIC:

ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Negligible heat loss to surroundings, (2) Constant properties, (3) Exhaust gas
properties are those of air.

( )
PROPERTIES: Table A-6, Water Tm = 87°C : cp = 4203 J / kg ⋅ K; Table A-4, Air
( Tm ≈ 275°C ) : cp = 1040 J / kg ⋅ K.

ANALYSIS: Since this is a cross-flow heat exchanger, we will use the ε – NTU method, for which
& c cp,c = 0.5 kg/s × 4203 J/kg ⋅ K = 2102 W/K
Cc = m
& h cp,h = 2 kg/s × 1040 J/kg ⋅ K = 2080 W/K
Ch = m
Cr = Cmin / Cmax = 0.990
q max = Cmin (Th,i - Tc,i ) = 2080 W/K (325 - 25)°C = 6.24 × 105 W

q = Cc (Tc,o - Tc,i ) = 2102 W/K (150 - 25)°C = 2.63 × 105 W


Thus
ε = q / q max = 0.421

and from Figure 11.14 or solving Eq. 11.32 iteratively for NTU,

NTU = 0.81
and
U=CminNTU/A = 2080 W/K × 0.81/10 m2 =168 W/m2·K <
COMMENTS: The hot outlet temperature is found from q = Ch (Th,i – Th,o) to be 199°C, thus
properties of the hot fluid should be evaluated at around 262°C. This will have little effect since cp is
not a strong function of temperature for water.
PROBLEM 11.10
2
KNOWN: Heat exchanger with two shell passes and eight tube passes having an area 925m ; 45,500
kg/h water is heated from 80°C to 150°C; hot exhaust gases enter at 350°C and exit at 175°C.
FIND: Overall heat transfer coefficient.
SCHEMATIC:

ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Negligible losses to surroundings, (2) Constant properties, (3) Exhaust gas
properties are approximated as those of atmospheric air.

( )
PROPERTIES: Table A-6, Water Tc = ( 80 + 150 ) °C / 2 = 388K : cc = cp,f = 4236 J/kg⋅K.

ANALYSIS: Since this is a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, we will use the ε - NTU method, for
which
45,500 kg/h
Cc = m
& c cc = × 4236 J/kg ⋅ K = 5.35 × 104 W/K
3600 s/h
q = Cc (Tc,o − Tc,i ) = 5.35 × 104 W/K (150 − 80)°C = 3.75 × 106 W

Then we can find Ch from an energy balance on the hot stream,


Ch = q/(Th,i − Th,o ) = 3.75 × 106 W/(350 − 175)°C = 2.14 × 104 W/K
Thus
Cr = Cmin/Cmax = 0.40
ε = q/Cmin (Th,i − Tc,i ) = 3.75 × 106 W/2.14 × 104 W/K (350 − 80)°C = 0.648

From Eqs. 11.31b and c, with n = 2,


1/n
⎛ εC − 1 ⎞ F −1
F= ⎜ r ⎟ = 1.45, ε1 = = 0.429
⎝ ε −1 ⎠ F − Cr

From Eqs. 11.30c and 11.30b,


2/ε1 − (1 + C r )
E= = 3.0
(1 + C2r )1/2
⎡ E − 1⎤
(NTU)1 = –(1 + C2r )−1/ 2 ln ⎢ ⎥ = 0.637
⎣ E + 1⎦
and from Eq. 11.31d,
NTU = n(NTU)1 = 1.27

Therefore,
U = NTU × Cmin/A = 1.27 × 2.14 × 104 W/K/(925 m2) = 29.5 W/m2·K <
COMMENTS: Compare the above result with representative values for air-water exchangers, as
given in Table 11.2.
PROBLEM 11.18

KNOWN: Inner tube diameter (D = 0.02 m) and fluid inlet and outlet temperatures corresponding to
design conditions for a counterflow, concentric tube heat exchanger. Overall heat transfer coefficient (U
= 500 W/m2⋅K) and desired heat rate (q = 3000 W). Cold fluid outlet temperature after three years of
operation.
FIND: (a) Required heat exchanger length, (b) Heat rate, hot fluid outlet temperature, overall heat
transfer coefficient, and fouling factor after three years.
SCHEMATIC:

ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Negligible heat loss to the surroundings, (2) Negligible tube wall conduction
resistance, (3) Constant properties.
ANALYSIS: (a) The tube length needed to achieve the prescribed conditions may be obtained from Eqs.
11.14 and 11.15 where ΔT1 = Th,i - Tc,o = 80°C and ΔT2 = Th,o - Tc,i = 120°C. Hence, ΔT1m = (120 -
80)°C/ln(120/80) = 98.7°C and
q 3000 W
L= = = 0.968 m <
(π D ) UΔT1m (π × 0.02 m ) 500 W m2⋅ K × 98.7o C
(b) With q = Cc(Tc,o - Tc,i), the following ratio may be formed in terms of the design and 3 year
conditions.
q
=
(
Cc Tc,o − Tc,i )= 60o C
= 1.333
q3 Cc ( Tc,o − Tc,i ) 45oC
3
Hence,
q3 = q 1.33 = 3000 W 1.333 = 2250 W <
Having determined the ratio of heat rates, it follows that
q
=
(
Ch Th,i − Th,o )= 20o C
= 1.333
q3 Ch ( Th,i − Th,o ) 160oC − T
h,o(3)
3
Hence,
Th,o(3) = 160o C − 20o C 1.333 = 145o C <
With ΔTlm,3 = (125 − 95 ) ln (125 95 ) = 109.3o C ,
q3 2250 W
U3 = = = 338 W m 2⋅ K <
( π DL Δ T
(
) 1m,3 π ( 0.02 m ) 0.968 m 109.3 C
o
)
Continued...
PROBLEM 11.18 (Cont.)

−1 −1
With U = ⎡⎣(1 h i ) + (1 h o ) ⎤⎦ and U3 = ⎡⎣(1 h i ) + (1 h o ) + R ′′f ,c ⎤⎦ ,

1 1 ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ 2 −4 2
R ′′f ,c = − =⎜ − ⎟ m ⋅ K W = 9.59 × 10 m ⋅ K W
U3 U ⎝ 338 500 ⎠
<
COMMENTS: Over time fouling will always contribute to a degradation of heat exchanger
performance. In practice it is desirable to remove fluid contaminants and to implement a regular
maintenance (cleaning) procedure.
PROBLEM 11.28
KNOWN: Flow rate, inlet temperatures and overall heat transfer coefficient for a regenerator.
Desired regenerator effectiveness. Cost of natural gas.
FIND: (a) Heat transfer area required for regenerator and corresponding heat recovery rate and outlet
temperatures, (b) Annual energy and fuel cost savings.
SCHEMATIC:

ASSUMPTIONS: (a) Negligible heat loss to surroundings, (b) Constant properties.


PROPERTIES: Problem 11.27, milk: cp = 3860 J/kg⋅K.
ANALYSIS: (a) With Cr = 1 and ε = 0.50 for one shell and two tube passes, Eq. 11.30c yields E =
1.414. With Cmin = 5 kg/s × 3860 J/kg⋅K = 19,300 W/K, Eq. 11.30b then yields
ln ⎡ ( E − 1) / ( E + l )⎤⎦ 19,300 W / K ln ( 0.171)
A = − min ⎣
C
=− = 12.03m2 <
( )
U 1/ 2 2
2000 W / m ⋅ K 1.414
l + C2r
With ε = 0.50, the heat recovery rate is then
( )
q = ε Cmin Th,i − Tc,i = 627,000 W <
and the outlet temperatures are
q 627,000 W
Tc,o = Tc,i + = 5°C + = 37.5°C <
Cc 19,300 W / K
q 627,000 W
Th,o = Th,i − = 70°C − = 37.5°C <
Ch 19,300 W / K
(b) The amount of energy recovered for continuous operation over 365 days is

ΔE = 627,000 W × 365d / yr × 24 h / d × 3600s / h = 1.98 × 1013 J / yr

The annual fuel savings SA is then

ΔE × Cng 1.98 × 107 MJ / yr × $0.02 / MJ


SA = = = $440,000 / yr <
η 0.9
COMMENTS: (1) With Cc = Ch, the temperature changes are the same for the two fluids, (2) A
larger effectiveness and hence a smaller value of A can be achieved with a counterflow exchanger
(compare Figs. 11.11 and 11.12 for Cr = 1), (c) The savings are significant and well worth the cost of
the heat exchanger. An additional benefit is that, with Th,o reduced from 70 to 37.5°C, less energy is
consumed by the refrigeration system used to restore the milk temperature to 5°C.
PROBLEM 11.64
KNOWN: Inlet temperature and flow rates for a concentric tube heat exchanger. Hot fluid outlet
temperature.
FIND: (a) Maximum possible heat transfer rate and effectiveness, (b) Preferred mode of operation.
SCHEMATIC:

ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state operation, (2) Negligible heat loss to surroundings, (3) Fixed
overall heat transfer coefficient.
PROPERTIES: Table A-5, Ethylene glycol ( Tm = 80°C): cp = 2650 J/kg⋅K; Table A-6, Water ( Tm
≈ 30°C): cp = 4178 J/kg⋅K.
ANALYSIS: (a) Using the ε-NTU method, find
& h cp,h = ( 0.5 kg / s )( 2650 J / kg ⋅ K ) = 1325 W / K.
Cmin = Ch = m

Hence from Eqs. 11.18 and 11.6,

( )
q max = Cmin Th,i − Tc,i = (1325 W / K )(100 − 15 ) °C = 1.13 × 105 W.

( )
& h cp,h Th,i − Th,o = 0.5 kg / s ( 2650 J / kg ⋅ K )(100 − 60 ) °C = 0.53 × 105 W.
q=m <
Hence from Eq. 11.19,

ε = q / q max = 0.53 ×105 /1.13 ×105 = 0.47. <


(b) From Eq. 11.7,

q 0.53 ×105
Tc,o = Tc,i + = 15°C + = 40.4°C.
& c c p,c
m 0.5kg / s × 4178J / kg ⋅ K

&h
Since Tc,o < Th,o, a parallel flow mode of operation is possible. However, with (Cmin/Cmax) = ( m
& c cp,c) = 0.63,
cp,h/ m

Fig. 11.10 → (NTU)PF ≈ 0.95 Fig. 11.11 → (NTU)CF ≈ 0.75.


Hence from Eq. 11.24

( ACF / A PF ) = ( NTU )CF / ( NTU )PF ≈ ( 0.75 / 0.95) = 0.79.


Because of the reduced size requirement, and hence capital investment, the counterflow mode of
operation is preferred.

You might also like