Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views86 pages

FEA Lect 1

The document discusses finite element analysis and related topics. It covers linear equations of motion for vibration and static structural analysis. It also discusses modal analysis, assuming harmonic motion and deriving the eigenvalue equation. Additionally, it covers static analysis techniques, including linear versus nonlinear solving, and assumptions made. Dynamic analysis is also reviewed, including modeling fluid-structure interaction using computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis.

Uploaded by

Mega Games
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views86 pages

FEA Lect 1

The document discusses finite element analysis and related topics. It covers linear equations of motion for vibration and static structural analysis. It also discusses modal analysis, assuming harmonic motion and deriving the eigenvalue equation. Additionally, it covers static analysis techniques, including linear versus nonlinear solving, and assumptions made. Dynamic analysis is also reviewed, including modeling fluid-structure interaction using computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis.

Uploaded by

Mega Games
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 86

Finite Element Analysis

Lecture 1

Dr./ Ahmed Nagib


April 30, 2016
Research and Development
Mathematical Model
Mathematical Model
Mathematical Model
Finite Element Analysis

The linear equation of motion for vibration is

𝑴 𝒙ሷ + 𝑪 𝒙ሶ + 𝑲 𝒙 = 𝑭

• 𝒙 , which is the displacement vector


• 𝒙ሷ , which is the acceleration vector
• 𝑴 , which is the Mass matrix
• 𝑲 , which is the stiffness matrix
• 𝑪 , which is the damping matrix
• 𝑭 , which is the load vector
Finite Element Softwares
Finite Element Analysis
Finite Element Analysis
Finite Element Analysis
Static Analysis
For a linear static structural analysis, the global displacement
vector 𝒙 is solved for in the matrix equation below:

𝑲 𝒙 = 𝑭

Assumptions made for linear static structural analysis are:


• 𝑲 , which is the global stiffness matrix, is constant
– Linear elastic material behavior is assumed
– Small deflection theory is used
• 𝑭 , which is the global load vector, is statically applied
– No time-varying forces are considered
– No damping effects
Axial Stress

13
Beam under the action of two tensile forces

14
Beam under the action of two tensile forces

15
Torsion Stress

16
Torsion Stress

17
Torsion Stress

18
Angle of Twist

19
Torsion of a Shaft with Circular Cross-Section

20
Torsion of a Shaft with Circular Cross-Section

21
Torsion of a Beam with the Square Cross-Section

22
Torsion of a Beam with the Square Cross-Section

23
Bending Stress

24
Bending Stress

25
Bending a Cantilever Beam under a Concentrated Load

26
Bending a Cantilever Beam under a Concentrated Load

27
Bending Stress

28
Bending Stress

29
Bending Stress

30
Bending Stress

31
Bending Stress

32
Bending Stress

33
Bending Stress

34
Bending of Curved beam

Displacement Stress in x direction


35
Finite Element Analysis
Finite Element Analysis
Static Analysis
Static Analysis
Static Analysis
Static Analysis
Static Analysis
Static Analysis
Linear vs Non Linear solve
In a linear analysis, the matrix equation [K]{x}={F} is solved in one iteration. That
means the model stiffness does not change during solve : [K] is constant. A non
linear solve allow stiffness changes and uses an iterative process to solve the
problem. In a static structural analysis, ANSYS runs a non linear solve
automatically when the model contains :
- Non linear material laws : Plasticity, Creep, Gasket, Viscoelasticity …
- Non linear contact : Frictionless, Rough, Frictional
- Large deflection turned <<ON>>
- Joints
- Bolt pretension
Modal Analysis
The linear equation of motion for free, un-damped vibration is
𝑴 𝒙ሷ + 𝑲 𝒙 = 𝟎
Assume harmonic motion:

𝒙 = 𝝓 𝒊 sin 𝜔𝑖 𝑡 + 𝜃𝑖
𝒙ሷ = −𝜔𝒊𝟐 𝝓 𝒊 sin 𝜔𝑖 𝑡 + 𝜃𝑖

Substituting 𝒙 and 𝒙ሷ 𝐢n the governing equation gives an


eigenvalue equation:

−𝜔𝒊𝟐 𝑴 + 𝑲 𝝓𝒊= 𝟎
where
𝜔𝑖 : Natural Frequencies
𝝓 𝒊 : Mode Shapes
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis

Assumptions for Modal Analysis


• [K] and [M] are constant:
– Linear elastic material behavior is assumed
– Small deflection theory is used, and no nonlinearities
included
– [C] is not present, so damping is not included
– {F} is not present, so no excitation of the structure is
assumed
– Mode shapes 𝝓 𝒊 are relative values, not absolute
Modal Analysis
Modal Results:
• Because there is no excitation applied to the structure the
mode shapes are relative values not actual ones.
–Because a modal result is based on the model’s properties
and not a particular input, we can interpret where the
maximum or minimum results will occur for a particular mode
shape but not the actual value.
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Modal Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Fluid-Structure Interaction
Solid Mechanics-Structural Analysis Fluid Dynamics

Solved by Finite Element Analysis Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

79
Recent Computational Methodology

Finite Element Analysis Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Commercial Ansys Mechanical, Abaqus Ansys Fluent, Ansys CFX, Open-foam


Software
80
Recent Computational Methodology

81
Recent Computational Methodology

82
Fluid-Structure Interaction
Recent Computational Methodology
1 way FSI vs Two way FSI

84
Fluid-Structure Interaction
Fluid Structure Interaction

You might also like