Political Butterflies at Midterm Exodus: A Critical Evaluation on the Issue of
Turncoatism by Political Parties in the Philippine Government
A term paper
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the course
PoliScie 201- Fundamentals of Political Science
Cacho, Marian
Inchoco, Patricia
Maestrado, Liana Nicole
BA Political Science I
Mark Bon G. Basadre
Instructor
Father Saturnino Urios University
Chapter I
Introduction and Objectives
The Philippines has a multiparty system in which it offers the citizens
of the country to vote in a wider range of choices. Through practicing an
elective political system in which everyone is involved and has the
opportunity to use their power and right to suffrage. We have electoral
system and has a regulations and rules to abide to in order for clean,
credible and honest electoral exercises that empowers the citizens to select
a well-deserve leader.
According to Philips Shively (2014), this leader has its political party or
the organization of officials or aspiring people wants to lead and serve in the
public office and linked with a group of citizen that could help them to attain
or maintain in power. This group of officials has its principles and political
beliefs wherein they have a chief aim to influence the policy and have the
power in the government and it is based on their political ideology. The
Philippines has well-known political parties namely are the Liberal Party
(LP) , Philippine Democratic Party- People’s Power (PDP-LABAN), Nationalist
Party (NP), Nationalist People’s Coalition (NPC) and other more major parties
that their member officials have attained seats in the public office.
Members of the political parties do solemnly swear for their loyalty
and probity for the principles and political beliefs of their parties. The pledge
of allegiance can be breakable if a member of a certain political party turns
against its ideology and changes its party.
Butterflies' wings are beautiful because of their striking color and
patterns and as they fly to a flower to gather nectar, it changes its color and
pattern. However, as we relate this in politics it is a pejorative term wherein
defines as political butterflies, when a member of the political party changes
its party. As these derogatorily called traditional politicians (TraPo) or dirty
rags who has been corrupt and become a factor that made the Philippines as
a oligarchic state or the power has attain by the few and elites. Moreover,
this pejorative term known as turncoatism weakens the political party
system, particularly in the Philippines. The Philippines has wishy-washy
political parties. (Quimpo,2007)
Switching alliances is no good for the country wherein most of the
politicians particularly the traditional politicians who hop party to party as
they change their political beliefs as well. According to Julio Teehankee, the
political party system has been abused thus committing the practice of
political turncoatism as a normal behavior. Because of that party system
reform and there are bill that has been propose by the senators and
representatives who are against with switching party or turncoatism. These
politicians hop aboard in a new ruling winning party (majority) for personal
interest to win in the elections and attain power in the government.
The problem with turncoatism is the citizen of the country are
confused about who political party they will support especially if there is a
certain politician that they supported that flits to another party. Turncoatism
became rampant in the country because of that the researchers came up
with the study of how we could develop the political party system and the
democratization in the country even though turncoatism was been allowed in
the Philippines. This study can help the researchers to know and further
discover political parties turncoatism based on the reliable facts and data
that they gather through their journey in search for the truth and analysis
prior to this issue.
Objectives
This term paperwork focuses on the institutional and legal context
within which political parties operate and address the issue of turncoatism,
which is very rampant and is obscuring the Philippine political party system.
It can be described as constraining, limiting and even detrimental to the
development and strengthening of political parties. With this in mind, the
paper has the following objectives:
1. To determine the background on the political history of political
parties in the Philippine government, politics, and society in further
understanding the current system (or the institutional-legal context within
which parties operate) and explain the behaviors that the system elicits
given its characteristics and features.
2. To identify how turncoatism affects the following:
2.1 The Philippine government
2.2 politics
2.3 society
3. To be able to provide a feasible point of reference for party reform
measures.
Chapter II
Discussion and Analysis
Turncoatism is especially present and seen during election days, where
the people power the phenomenon and issue-stance in the voting behaviors
of the politicians. As if considered a part of the Filipino political culture and
the changing of political parties from one party member to another has
nothing but a common happening that exists in the political dynamics of the
Philippines. However, it does not only delay the development and maturity of
political parties but also leaves the political and societal environment with
nothing but promises and considers the politics, not as a representative of
the Filipino people but to take advantage of the situations for their good.
What about the party organizations? Party Recruitment? And party
membership, education, and training of its members? All of these are
basically non-existent or merely done or produced as a matter of form as
political parties become expiring as soon as elections are finished. They
would only come back to life when elections come back to the picture again.
There is no opportunity for serious and active recruitment of younger
members who would grow into the organization. Whatever passes the
continuing education and training of their members are far between and
half-hearted at best. Needless to say, there is a need for several approaches
to change the way the parties behave by changing the landscape in which
they operate within the short to medium term. So how do we stop political
turncoatism and what is to be done? Party loyalty can give rise by making
the political career of the politician linked to his party membership or party
identification. The political party must be the only escape and support of the
party member so that his approach in politics must rely on the decisions
made by his party leader, which also has a link with party finances.
Historical Background
History shapes the present and today. Filipino society and culture have
fairly developed and influences after the colonization of Spain, the United
States and Japan in the Philippines. Moreover, through tracing back, the past
based on archaeological facts and evidence gathered by historians, the
researches able to determine the background on the political history of
political parties in the Philippine government, politics, and society. Based on
the political culture wherein we can identify and explain the behaviors that
the system elicits given its characteristics and features that are controversial
and the problem of the party system.
Historians believe the Philippines dates back to the Paleolithic age.
During the Paleolithic age, there is a small portion of the population and
there was no need for rules and laws or a political leader will command to
discipline and regulate the behaviors of the inhabitants in the Philippines
other than matriarchal or patriarchal authority which nature has provided.
(Tan, 2009) Later on, the Philippines has been woken in governance after it
was once introduced in 1971. Based on the historical data provided by the
Philippine Consulate General (2014), “Ferdinand Magellan came to the
Philippines on March 16, 1521, and claimed the country for the Spanish
Crown. Spain introduced changes in the political, social, and cultural life of
the Filipino people. A colonial government was established in Manila in
1571.”
Colonialism has shaped the culture of the Philippines and even the
behavior of the people. The Spaniards, Americans, and Japanese came in the
country and trying to subdue our territories but most of the Filipinos have
fought back and revolved to raise what is right and to attain freedom for the
country. During the American Regime, they educate and molded the
leadership of the Filipinos to become the future leader and statesmen of the
country. According to the journal of Napoleon Casambre (1982), “the
introduction of the American system of education has an influence on the life
and culture of the Filipino during and after the colonial period especially in
state-building and other political aspects that it is generally regarded as the
"greatest contribution" of American colonialism in the Philippines.”
History tells us that even though we had national heroes who fought
for the triumph of our nation and have loyalty and devoted even he or she
will sacrifice his/her own life because of love for the nation. These historical
events marked and embedded in the hearts of the Filipino people to stand
what is right and has the essence of patriotism. However, there are still
traitors and two-faced political actors wanted to attain power for personal
interest nor benefits. There is literature that discusses politics concerning a
culture that may be helpful in the explanation and analysis in discerning the
root of turncoatism. Based on the study of Yazhmin Malajito (2018), Felipe
Buencamino could be considered as a threat and a traitor because he was
once known for being a Filipino muchas caras (person with two-sided face)
because he was suspected to be a spy and a traitor to the Filipino people. He
was a lawyer and become the cabinet member of Aguinaldo but then he
sided with the Spanish but he came back and joined the Filipino camp after
being arrested by the conquistadors and he switched sides again with the
Americans. There are accounts that Buencamino was once among those who
are lobbying for the acceptance of the American colonial regime in our
country. Even Gen. Antonio Luna once whacked him on the face because
Buencamino is going to propose a negotiation with the Americans because
he is in favor of the proposed autonomy of the Americans. This historical
account has been a realization that it would be an ill and hindrance to one’s
country development to have two-sided members or switching allegiance
because the legitimacy and accountability of the political butterflies could be
questioned by the voters.
A Filipino historian Ambeth Ocampo describes Pedro Paterno as the
greatest turncoat or “balimbing” in Philippine history wherein balimbing
refers to a carambola fruit because it has many sides it becomes a slang to
the country. It refers to the persons who switch or change sides. Why does
Historian Ambeth Ocampo say that Pedro Paterno is a turncoat? The
“original” turncoat, according to Ocampo, was “first on the Spanish side and
then wormed his way to power to become President of Malolos Convention in
1899.”
There are factors nor reasons of the turncoats and traitors switch sides
because if they can get benefits from it like what Pedro Patterno after the
signing of the pact of Biak na bato which is a peace pact to end the
Philippine revolution and he serves as a mediator between the two states.
He requested the dukedom, a seat in the Spanish Senate and a million bucks
as a reward however, his request is not granted by the governor-general.
During the American occupation, he was captured then he swore allegiance
to the Americans and became one of the prominent Filipinos who take the
American side. (Malajito, 2018) This made Pedro Paterno as an infamous
turncoat of the country as long as he could be benefitted he can switch
allegiances repeatedly.
After the American Colonial Regime, the first political party in the
country was established in 1900 under the auspice of American colonial and
it is the Federal Party which advocates federalism. (De Guzman, 2018) After
World War II dated 1945, there is a striking competition on the two arising
political parties in elections in the country, which is the Nacionalista Party,
and the Liberal Party. Nacionalista Party is a political party that has the
political belief of nationalism embedded in their principles and works
ensuring the greatest good of all the people and it is the ruling party in 1946
during Quezon and Osmena’s administration. On the other hand, the Liberal
Party founded by Manuel Roxas and the other two in 1946. It has a political
belief of liberalism or center in the political spectrum. It has its goals for the
country to serve and gives the importance of freedom, justice, and
solidarity. Post-war President Manuel Roxas has been a party member of
Nacionalista before 1945 and later in 1946, he founded the liberal party
serves as a breaking liberal wing of the Nacionalista Party. During the
elections of 1961, the ruling party is the Liberal because of that there are
Nacionalista party members switch allegiances and joined the Liberal Party.
These became rampant and common up until today. Politicians are eager to
take sides in the ruling party or who has the party that attained government
power. (Lande, 1967)
How turncoats affect the Philippine government? Is it a threat or a
concern that we must prohibit? As a democratic state, it is important to
strengthen the political party system for the good for the people. Most of the
countries condemned turncoats but in our country, there is rampant-party
switching. They know that it will be obscuring and destabilized the
government. The politician easily transfers to another party where he thinks
he will gain more advantage in many ways because there are no limits linked
to him changing his party. The consequences for party accountability and
responsibility are crucial to any democracy, where the politician under the
party cannot be accountable for the promises he made on behalf of his
party. Then democracy is seriously weakened.
Anti-Turncoatism Bill
There are political party reform bills which failed to be legislated upon
congress and which needs to pass soon, the Political Party Reform Bill that
Senator Franklin Drilon files to strengthen Political Parties and to penalize
and the senate no. 1663. Moreover, it has been introduced by the late
Merriam Santiago, which is the senate bill no. 1633 in the 14th Congress.
She tends to catch these butterflies and penalize them in its bill called the
Anti-Political Turncoatism Act. This was inspired by the belief that penalizing
these butterflies can restore belief and strengthen the political party system
in the Philippines. The Anti-Political Turncoatism Act is an act defining and
punishing political turncoatism, which is why no one in the history of
Philippine political parties has been made to pay for changing their party
color. It may specify is a better accounting of party funds as well as
matching government support for the recognized political parties and that is
also one way of limiting election expenses during a campaign which would
be a major source of corruption later.
Senator Jinggoy Estrada recommends passage of the bill that he
proposes in the 13th Congress, it is an act that prohibiting political
turncoatism and providing penalties for violation thereof. There are
composed penalties wherein a political actor who has found guilty of political
turncoatism cannot and disqualified to run in any elective position. Besides,
if he has already been elected he shall not be assumed to office. There are
also exceptions wherein this act cannot be applicable nor applied to
independent candidates.
Based on the proposed House Bill No. 1695 by Maximo B. Rodriguez
(2016), Political turncoatism is a change of political party affiliation by a
party member one year before or after the national elections. Any party
member can change legitimately change their political party affiliation only a
second year of a three-year term.
The researchers have collected data from the books, journals and
reliable and liable websites and it has been cited well. The researchers of
this term paper have followed ethical and political considerations during the
making of the critical evaluation of the issue in political turncoatism.
Moreover, the scope of their study about the issue of turncoatism in political
parties is only about political parties in the Philippines. Upon reading the
collected data, this phenomenon is considered as natural as its existence in
the Philippines and up to date, there are no clear-cut reforms that have been
concluded to combat the ailment. The study is socially relevant to the
Philippines for it may finally better the political arena in the country.
Therefore, this paper provides an analysis that deemed important to
educate the society of the nature of turncoatism, which makes
ineffectiveness, if not paralyzes many of the country’s policies and
programs. Politicians who have switch parties are referred to turncoats but it
is not healthy to swear allegiance to other opposing parties, it is keeping the
country to develop in the government system. As history tells us that
traitors or turncoats who switch allegiances are the bane of the national
heroes to attain freedom and justice that our motherland deserves to have.
It is because of their selfishness and they did not even care for the country’s
development but they only care for what they can gain after they can attain
power in the government. These politicians have been corrupt and it will
affect not only the economic development but they are the ones who are
depriving the marginalized sectors to attain prosperity and development in
their life. How can we eradicate mass poverty and other national concerns
even the political party system has been obscured and weakened in its
characteristics and features. The consequences for party accountability and
responsibility are crucial to any democracy, where the politician under the
party cannot be accountable for the promises he made on behalf of his
party.
Chapter III
Conclusions and Recommendations
In this paper, the researchers had demonstrated and to mainly focus
on the troublesome political party which is turncoatism as it is embodied in
the Philippines’ party system. The researchers first dealt with the composed
objectives by identifying how turncoatism could affect the Philippine
Government, Politics as well as to the society and for the researchers’ to be
able to provide a feasible point of reference for party reform measures.
Apart from these, not nearly but all the literature in the Philippines party
structure leads to the inference that the Philippines indeed has a fragile
political party framework marked by non-ideological strategies and who
practice the essence of Turncoatism. Moreover, the fact that it is completely
obvious that turncoats can be seen and rampant in the Philippines’ political
party structure it will latter to weaken and destabilize the Government of the
Philippines. Moreover, as well as the implementation of Bill Political Party to
seek penalized people who seems to have found guilty for political turncoats
and by that they aim to encourage groups to be united as one and policy
obedience by a discouragement to alter political membership for any political
party member until or when elected or after an election.
Recommendations
Chasing butterflies is hard and complex as they are the one who
becomes factors and hindrance of the development of the state particularly
the traditional politicians (TraPo) who switch new ruling party even if that
political party has opposing political belief, as long as they win in the
elections and attaining power for private gain not for public good.
Subsequent are the recommendations that the researchers gathered on how
to mitigate and efficiently eliminate turncoats in the Philippines:
There are proposed bill such Party Reform bill of 2002 or senate bill
no. 2442, it will be a solution not only for addressing the political
turncoatism but to address all political party concerns such as party fiancé
and campaign contribution that weakens the political party system.
Immediate passage of the bill serves a great help. Political party must
require to have a merit system in selecting and nominating their members in
order to test their professionalism and their probity in serving in the public
office. Moreover, it promotes the loyalty and accountability of the party
members. It would a help in building up and institutionalizing the behaviors
in the party as well as the party system in order to minimize the rampant
switching of parties. There are instances that there is hindrance in approving
the bill because not all in both houses approves penalizing butterflies. Sergio
Osmena III, has been reported spoken about the proposed bill penalizing the
butterflies. “Why are you preventing something that is not a crime?” this is
his opinion even if he is an independent and penalizing butterflies has
exceptions on running independent candidates. Based on the
recommendations of Joy Aceron and Glenford Leonillo (2009), a technical
working group shall focuses hasten in pushing the bill. There are different
Party Reform Bill to address solutions for the how we could strengthen the
party system because that there are readings in the Congress going on in
able to examine and determine what reforms are really needed to effect
change in the political system.
Bibliography
Books:
Aceron, J., & Leonillo, G. (2009). Reforming the Philippine Political
Party System. Citizen-Party Linkages in the Philippines: Failure to
Connect?. Retrieved from https://library.fes.de/pdf-
files/bueros/philippinen/07131.pdf
Manacsa, R. C., & Tan, A. C. (2005). Manufacturing Parties: Re-
examining the Transient Nature of Philippine Political Parties. Party
Politics, 11(6), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068805057608
Tan, S. (2009). A History of the Philippines. Quezon City, PH: The
University of the Philippines Press. .
Teehankee, J. Reforming the Philippine Political Party System. Citizen-
Party Linkages in the Philippines: Failure to Connect?. Retrieved from
https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/philippinen/07131.pdf
Shively, P. (2014). Power & Choice: An Introduction to Political Science
(Int'l Ed). (14th ed.). US: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Inc. .
Website Sources:
De Guzman, M. (2018). The Institutional Imperative in Reforming the
Philippines' Political Party System. Retrieved March 20, 2020. from
https://www.academia.edu/33572909/The_Institutional_Imperative_in
_Reforming_the_Philippines_Political_Party_System
http://www.ombudsman.gov.ph/UNDP4/wp-
content/uploads/2013/03/KP4.-Primer-1-Building-the-Philippine-
Political-Party-System.pdf
Malajito, Y. (2018). Traitors in the Philippine History who are loyal to
one thing. Retrieved March 21, 2020, from
https://nolisoli.ph/39688/traitors-philippine-history/
Philippine Consulate General. The Philippines: History
https://chicagopcg.dfa.gov.ph/the-philippines-history
Quimpo, Nathan. (2007) "Trapo Parties and Corruption."
cpcabrisbane.org/Kasama/2007/V21n1/TrapoPartiesAndCorruption.ht
m. Accessed 21 March 2020.
Rodriguez, M. (2016). An Act Strengthening Political Party System and
Appropriating Funds therefor. Retrieved from
http://www.congress.gov.ph/legisdocs/basic_17/HB01695.pdf
Estrada, J. AN ACT PROHIBITING POLITICAL TURNCOATISM AND
PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF Retrieved from
http://www.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/30402230!.pdf
Santiago, M. & Drilon, F. AN ACT DEFINING AND PUNISHING
POLITICAL TURNCOATISM Retrieved from
https://www.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/59915330!.pdf