Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
153 views4 pages

Constitutional Law II Course Outline

The document provides an outline for a Constitutional Law II course covering topics like the fundamental powers of the state, bill of rights, and specific civil and political rights. It lists key cases relevant to understanding police power, eminent domain, taxation, suffrage, citizenship, due process, equal protection, freedom of expression, and other concepts. The cases will help examine constitutional principles and serve as references for analyzing rights and state powers under the Philippines constitution.

Uploaded by

mohawxz357
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
153 views4 pages

Constitutional Law II Course Outline

The document provides an outline for a Constitutional Law II course covering topics like the fundamental powers of the state, bill of rights, and specific civil and political rights. It lists key cases relevant to understanding police power, eminent domain, taxation, suffrage, citizenship, due process, equal protection, freedom of expression, and other concepts. The cases will help examine constitutional principles and serve as references for analyzing rights and state powers under the Philippines constitution.

Uploaded by

mohawxz357
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Saint Mary's University

COLLEGE OF LAW
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

PART IX- NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY (Article XII) – REFER TO CHAPTER XII OF
FR.JOAQUIN BERNAS’ CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES AND POWERS OF GOVERNMENT

Cases:
1. Carino v. Insular Government, 212 U.S. 449 (1909) – NOTE: This pertains to the decision of the Supreme Court
of the United States, NOT the 1907 decision of the Philippine Supreme Court
2. Laurel v. Garcia, G.R. Nos. 92013 and 92047, 25 July 1990 (187 SCRA 797)
3. Chavez v. Public Estates Authority and AMARI, G.R. No. 133250, 9 July 2002
4. Ramirez v. vda. De Ramirez, 111 SCRA 704
5. Relosa v. Gaw Chee Hun, 93 Phil 827 (1953)
6. Philippine Banking Corporation v. Lui She, 21 SCA 52 (1967)
7. Frenzel v. Catito, G.R. No. 143958, 11 July 2003
8. Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS, G.R. No. 122156, 3 February 1997
9. La Bugal B’laan Tribal Association v. DENR, G.R. No. 127882, 1 December 2004 (NOTE: Ruling on the Motion
for Reconsideration, NOT the original Decision dated 27 January 2004)
10. Tanada v. Angara, G.R. No. 118295, 2 May 1997
11. Wilson P. Gamboa v. Finance Secretary Margarito Teves, et al., G.R. No. 176579, 28 June 2011.

COURSE OUTLINE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II
Second Semester, School Year 2019-2020

TEXTBOOK: ISAGANI A. CRUZ, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, QUEZON CITY: CENTRAK BOOK SUPPLY,
INC., 2007 UPDATED EDITION.

TOPIC/ CASES
REFERENCE/S
THE FUNDAMENTAL Police Power
POWERS OF THE STATE  MMDA v. Bel-Air Village Association, G.R. No. 135962, 27
March 2000
General Principles (Chapter  Lutz v. Araneta, 98 Phil 148/Association of Small Landowners
4 of the Textbook) v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343
 Binay v. Domingo, 201 SCRA 508/Villacorta v. Bernardo, 143
The Police Power (Chapter 5 SCRA 480
of the Textbook)  Basco v. PAGCOR, 197 SCRA 52

Eminent Domain
Eminent Domain (Chapter 6  City of Manila v. Chinese Community, 40 Phil 349/Republic of
of the Textbook) the Philippines v. La Orden de PP. Benedictinos de Filipinas,
1 SCRA 646
Taxation (Chapter 7 of the  Philippine Press Institute v. COMELEC, 244 SCRA 272
Textbook)  City Government v. Ericta, G.R. No. 34915, 24 June 1983
 Export Processing Zone v. Dulay, 149 SCRA 305

BILL OF RIGHTS: CIVIL AND


POLITICAL RIGHTS Suffrage
 Kabataan Party-List, et al. v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 221318,
General Principles 16 December 2015
 Romuladez v. Regional Trial Court, G.R. No. 104960, 14
Suffrage (Article V of the September 1993
1987 Constitution)  Akbayan v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 147066, 26 March 2001

1|P a g e
 Macalintal v. Commission on Elections, 405 SCRA 614
Citizenship (Chapter 22 of
the Textbook; Republic Act
No. 9225 (Citizenship Citizenship
Retention and Reacquisition  Re: Application for Admission to the Philippine of Vicente D.
Act of 2003) Ching, 316 SCRA 1
 Valles v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 137000, 9 August 2000
Due Process of Law  Tecson v. COMELEC, 424 SCRA 277
 Moy Ya Lim Yao v. The Commissioner of Immigration, 41
(Chapter 8 of the Textbook)
SCRA 292
 Bengson v. HRET, 357 SCRA 545
Equal Protection (Chapter 9
 Mercado v. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630
of the Textbook)
 Teodora Sobejana-Condon v. COMELEC, et al., G.R. No.
198742, 10 August 2012
Searches and Seizures
(Chapter 10 of the Textbook; Due Process
Rules 126 of the 2000  Corona v. United Harbor Pilots, G.R. No. 111953, 12
Revised Rules of Criminal December 1997
Procedure)  Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, 19 November
2001 (“void for vagueness” doctrine)
 City of Manila v. Judge Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, 12 April
2005
Liberty of Abode and Travel  Lupangco v. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 848
(Chapter 11 of the Textbook)  Army and Navy Club v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 110223, 8
April 1997
Freedom of Religion  Acebedo Optical v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 10152, 31
(Chapter 12 of the Textbook) March 2000

Equal Protection
Freedom of Expression
 International School Alliance of Educators v. Quisumbing, 333
(Chapter 13 of the Textbook;
SCRA 13
Republic Act No. 10175  Dumlao v. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 392
[Cybercrime Prevention Act of  GSIS v. Montesclaros, 434 SCRA 441
2012])
Searches and Seizures
The Impairment Clause  People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57
(Chapter 14 of the Textbook)  Roan v. Gonzales, 145 SCRA 687
 Pangandaman v. Casar, 159 SCRA 599
Non-Imprisonment for Debt  People v. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683
(Chapter 16 of the Textbook)  Valmonte v. De Villa, 178 SCRA 211/185 SCRA 665 (Motion
for Reconsideration)
Involuntary Servitude  Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159
(Chapter 17 of the Textbook)  People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716
 People v. Canton, 394 SCRA 478
Speedy Disposition of Cases  Zulueta v. Court of Appeals, 253 SCRA 699
(Chapter 19 of the Textbook)  Saluday v. People, G.R. No. 215305, 3 April 2018

Liberty of Abode and Travel


 Marcos v. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668/178 SCRA 760 (Motion
for Reconsideration)

Freedom of Religion
 Estrada v. Escritor, A.M. P-02-1651, 4 August 2003
 Valmores v. Achacoso, G.R. No. 217453, 19 July 2017
 Ang Ladlad v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 190582, 8 April 2010
 Austria v. NLRC, G.R. No. 124382, 16 August 1999/ Fonacier
v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-5917, 28 January 1955
 Islamic Dawah Council of the Philippines, Inc. v. Office of the
Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 153888, 9 July 2003
 Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu, 219
SCRA 256/251 SCRA 569 (Motion for Reconsideration)
 Iglesia ni Cristo v. Court of Appeals, 259 SCRA 529

2|P a g e
 Aglipay v. Ruiz, 64 Phil 201
 James M. Imbong, et al. v. Paquito N. Ochoa, Jr., et al., G.R.
No. 204819, 8 April 2014

Freedom of Expression
 Eastern Broadcasting Corp. V. Dans, 137 SCRA 628
 Borjal v. Court of Appeals, 301 SCRA 1
 Filipino Broadcasting Network v. Ago Medicaland Educational
Center-Bicol Christian College of Medicine, 448 SCRA 413
 Pita v. Court of Appeals, 178 SCRA 362
 MTRCB v. ABS-CBN, 448 SCRA 575
 Ayer Productions Pty. Ltd. V. Judge Capulong, 160 SCRA 865
(1988)
 Newsounds Broadcasting v. Dy, G.R. No. 170270, 2 April
2009
 Sanidad v. COMELEC, 181 SCRA 529
 In Re: Emil P. Jurado, 243 SCRA 299
 Reyes v. Bagatsing, 125 SCRA 553
 Miriam College Foundation v. Court of Appeals, 348 SCRA
265
 Jose Jesus M. Disini, Jr., et al. v Secretary of Justice, et al.,
G.R. No. 203335, 11 February 2014
 In relation to Academic Freedom (Section 5 [2], Article XIV of
the Constitution); Cases: Garcia v. Faculty Admission
Committee, 68 SCRA 277 (1975), Miriam College v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 127930, 15 December 2000;

Impairment Clause
 Philippine Veterans Bank Employees’ Union v. Philippine
Veterans Bank, 189 SCRA 14

Right to Information
 Chavez v. PCGG, G.R. No. 130716. December 9, 1998/19
May 1999 (Motion for Reconsideration)

Poverty and Legal Protection


 People v. Rio, 201 SCRA 702

BILL OF RIGHTS: RIGHTS Rights of the Accused


OF THE ACCUSED  People v. Mahinay, 302 SCRA 455 (Miranda Rights)
 People v. Bravo, 318 SCRA 812 (Exclusionary Rule)
Rights of the Accused  People v. Andan, 269 SCRA 95 (Confessions and Admissions
(Chapter 20 of the Textbook; to the Media)
Rule 114 of the 2000 Revised  Olivas v. Office of the Ombudsman, 239 SCRA 283 (Criminal
Rules of Criminal Procedure Investigation v. Preliminary Investigation)
[Bail]; Sections 7-8, Rule 117  Serapio v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148468, 28 January
2003/Enrile v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 213847, 18 August
of the 2000 Revised Rules of
2015 – Read also the Dissenting Opinion of J. Leonen (Bail)
Criminal Procedure [Double
 Webb v. People, 276 SCRA 243 (Impartial Trial)
Jeopardy])
 Lejano v. People, G.R. No. 176389, 14 December 2010
(Proof of Guilt)
Ex Post Facto Laws  Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (Prejudicial Publicity)
(Chapter 15 of the Textbook)  Re: Request for Radio-TV Coverage of the Trial in the
Sandiganbayan of the Plunder Cases Against the Former
The Writ of Habeas Corpus President Joseph E. Estrada, 360 SCRA 248 (Public Trial)
(Chapter 18 of the Textbook)  People v. Salas, 143 SCRA 163 (Trial in Absentia)
 Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70 (Speedy Trial)
Speedy Disposition of Cases  Cabal v. Kapunan, 6 SCRA 1059 (Right Against Self-
& Free Access to Courts Incrimination)
(Chapters 19 & 21 of the  Beltran v. Samson, 53 Phil 570 (Right Against Self-
Textbook) Incrimination)
 People v. Judge Ayson, 175 SCRA 210 (Right Against Self-
Incrimination)
3|P a g e
 Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, 297 SCRA 754 (Cruel and
Degrading Punishment)
 People v. Velasco, 340 SCRA 207 (Double Jeopardy)

Writ of Habeas Corpus


Ilusorio v. Bildner, 332 SCRA 169/361 SCRA 427 (Motion for
Reconsideration)

OTHER REFERENCES:

Constitutional Rights and Social Demands by Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J. (2004 Edition)
Constitutional Law: Notes and Readings on the Bill of Rights, Citizenship and Suffrage by Rene Gorospe,
Volumes I and II (2006 Edition)

Prepared by
HERSON S. VALMORES
Associate Professor, SMU-LAW

4|P a g e

You might also like