Peringkat Borg Dari Pengerahan

Persepsi
Original Editor Uchechukwu Chukwuemeka (/User:Uchechukwu_Chukwuemeka)

Top Contributors - Uchechukwu Chukwuemeka (/User:Uchechukwu_Chukwuemeka), Kim Jackson

(/User:Kim_Jackson), Adam Vallely Farrell (/User:Adam_Vallely_Farrell), Karen Wilson
(/User:Karen_Wilson) and Lauren Lopez (/User:Lauren_Lopez)

Contents
1 Objective
2 Versions And Scoring
3 Intended Population
4 Method of Use
5 Evidence
5.1 Reliability
5.2 Validity
5.3 Responsiveness
6 References

Objektif
Peringkat borg dari tenaga yang dirasakan (RPE) adalah skala ukuran hasil yang digunakan dalam
mengetahui resep intensitas latihan (/Physical_Activity_and_Exercise_Prescription) . Ini digunakan untuk
memantau kemajuan dan cara latihan pada pasien jantung serta populasi pasien lain yang menjalani
rehabilitasi dan pelatihan ketahanan.

Skala Borg RPE dikembangkan oleh Gunnar Borg [1] untuk aktivitas rating dan sesak napas selama
aktivitas fisik (/Physical_activity) ; Artinya, seberapa keras aktivitas yang ditunjukkan oleh detak jantung
(/Anatomy_of_the_Human_Heart) dan pernapasan yang tinggi
(/Physical_Activity_and_Respiratory_Conditions) , keringat yang banyak, dan pengerahan otot.

Versi Dan Penilaian

Borg original version is a scale of 6-20; it has a high correlation to heart rate and multiplying each number
by 10 gives the training heart rate as at the time of scoring. It was later reconstructed to category (C) ratio
(R) scale, termed Borg CR10 Scale or modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale which is mostly used in diagnosis of
breathlessness and dyspnea, chest pain and musculo-skeletal pain. The CR-10 scale is best used in a
specific area of the body sensation such as muscle pain or from pulmonary responses. [2]

Borg RPE Scale Borg CR10 Scale

Scoring Level of Exertion Scoring Level of Exertion
6 No Exertion 0 No Exertion
7 Extremely Light 0.5 Very very Slight
8 1 Very Slight
9 Very Light 2 Slight
10 3 Moderate
 11 Light 4 Somewhat Severe
12 5 Severe
13 Somewhat Hard 6
14 7 Very Severe
15 Hard (Heavy) 8
16 9 Very very Severe
17 Very Hard 10 Maximal
18
19 Extremely Hard
20 Maximal Exertion

In Borg RPE;

9 = ‘very light’ exercise which equals walking slowly for few minutes at own pace of a healthy
individual..
13 = ‘somewhat hard’ but the individual is still able to continue the activity.
17 = ‘very hard’. A healthy person can continue but must push themselves beyond their comfort of
being very fatigued.
19 = extremely strenuous exercise.for most people, the hardest they have ever experienced.

Intended Population
It is intended for all patient under rehabilitation. and for monitoring exercise prescription in athletes.It may
not be suitable for children's use as the scoring is difficult to interpret in this age group.[3]

Method of Use
The scale is a very simple numerical list. Participants are asked to rate their exertion on the scale during
the activity, taking into consideration feelings of physical stress and fatigue, disregarding any factor such
as leg pain or breathlessness but focusing on the whole feeling of exertion. This number chosen connotes
the intensity of activity allowing the participant to speed up or slow down movements/activity. The scale
takes few seconds to complete, can be self or researcher administered in single occasion or multiple
times.

Evidence
Reliability
Testing of the subject twice was used in ascertaining reliability in a study and Borg RPE was found to be
reliable in rating exertion[4][5] The verbal anchor using VAS of the scale when tested in different clinical
group and setting was found to have no significant difference in meaning in the groups except for the
group that has a brain injury.[6]

Validity
Originally RPE was validated against heart rate.[7] With time, RPE has since been researched extensively in
a variety of different conditions and population groups.
Borg RPE scores were positively associated with heart rate in adults during exercise sessions using the Wii
Fit Plus.[8] 

Skinner et al, found no significant differences in any of the physiological and perceptual variables in work
intensity when the work load was presented in a random order and compared with those obtained during
the progressive exercise test.[4]

A recent study reported that the Borg RPE scale may be used in individuals with Parkinson’s disease in
which formal exercise testing may not be available.[9]

RPE - Rating of Perceived …

[10]

Responsiveness
A work[11] done in a laboratory setting comparing physiological measurements and actual lifting tasks in
the workplace found a relationship between perceived physical exertion and individual physical capacity; in
both cardiovascular (/Cardiovascular_fitness_in_individuals_with_SCI)[12]and muscular work[13]. However, a
research by by Village et al.[14] shows a weak relationship between perceived physical exertion and
workload

References
1. Rating of perceived exertion. Available from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rating_of_perceived_exertion
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rating_of_perceived_exertion)(accessed 24 May 2019)
2. Williams N. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. Occupational Medicine.2017;
67(5):404–405, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqx063
3. Pfeiffer K, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, Reeves MJ, Robert MM. Reliability and validity of the Borg and
OMNI RPE Scales in adolescent girls. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2003; 34(12):2057-
61.
4. Skinner JS, Hutsler R, Bergsteinová V, Buskirk ER. The validity and reliability of a rating scale of
perceived exertion. Medicine and science in sports. 1973;5(2): 94-6.
5. Lamb KL, Eston RG, Corns D. Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill
exercise.Br J Sports Med 1999;33:336–339
6. Dawes, Helen N. et al. Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scales: Do the Verbal Anchors Mean the
Same for Different Clinical Groups? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005;86(5): 912 -
916
7. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013 Mar 4.
8. Pollock BS,  Barkley JE, PotenzinI N, Desalvo RM, Buser SL, Otterstetter et al. Validity of Borg Ratings of
Perceived Exertion During Active Video Game Play. Int J Exerc Sci. 2013; 6(2): 164–170.
9. PENKO AL, BARKLEY JE, KOOP MM, ALBERTS JL. Borg scale is valid for ratings of perceived exertion
for individuals with Parkinson’s disease. International journal of exercise science. 2017;10(1):76.
10. Vivo Phys-Evan Mathews. RPE - Rating of Perceived Exertion. Available from:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgEHl0-IB14 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgEHl0-IB14)
 [last accessed 30/4/2019]
11. Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Persson R, Andersen CH, Andersen LL. Is Borg’s perceived exertion scale a
useful indicator of muscular and cardiovascular load in blue-collar workers with lifting tasks? A cross-
sectional workplace study. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014;114(2):425–434.
12. Scherr J, Wolfarth B, Christle JW, Pressler A, Wagenpfeil S, Halle M. Associations between Borg’s
Rating of Perceived Exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol
2013;113(1):147–155
13. Fontes EB, Smirmaul BP, Nakamura FY, Pereira G, Okano AH, Altimari LR et al. The relationship between
rating of perceived exertion and muscle activity during exhaustive constant-load cycling. Int J Sports
Med 2010;31(10):683–688.
14. Village J, Frazer M, Cohen M, Leyland A, Park I, Yassi A. Electromyography as a measure of peak and
cumulative workload in intermediate care and its relationship to musculoskeletal injury: an exploratory
ergonomic study. Appl Ergon 2005;36(5):609–618

: Cardiopulmonary (/Category:Cardiopulmonary)
Cardiopulmonary - Outcome Measures (/Category:Cardiopulmonary_-_Outcome_Measures)
Outcome Measures (/Category:Outcome_Measures)
Older People/Geriatrics (/Category:Older_People/Geriatrics)
Older People/Geriatrics - Outcome Measures (/Category:Older_People/Geriatrics_-_Outcome_Measures)
Exercise Testing (/Category:Exercise_Testing)
Cardiovascular System - Assessment and Examination (/Category:Cardiovascular_System_-
_Assessment_and_Examination)