Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views3 pages

Template For Rubrics For Project Type Courses: 10% of Total Grade (10 Marks)

This document provides a template for rubrics to evaluate project-based courses. It includes 5 rubrics to assess different aspects of a student project such as the proposal, progress reports, presentation, and final assessment. Each rubric contains criteria that are scored on a scale from excellent to poor. The criteria cover areas like the project proposal, modeling, implementation, results analysis, formatting, and presentation skills. The rubrics provide descriptions for scoring projects at different quality levels to evaluate students in a standardized way.

Uploaded by

sachin kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views3 pages

Template For Rubrics For Project Type Courses: 10% of Total Grade (10 Marks)

This document provides a template for rubrics to evaluate project-based courses. It includes 5 rubrics to assess different aspects of a student project such as the proposal, progress reports, presentation, and final assessment. Each rubric contains criteria that are scored on a scale from excellent to poor. The criteria cover areas like the project proposal, modeling, implementation, results analysis, formatting, and presentation skills. The rubrics provide descriptions for scoring projects at different quality levels to evaluate students in a standardized way.

Uploaded by

sachin kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Template for Rubrics for Project type Courses

Project Excellent Good Average Poor


Rubric Evaluation Description
Criteria (100%) (75%) (50%) (25%)

Title Title should explain the problem,


Constitution technology and methodology should
and Domain be reflected from title, Grammar and 5 3.75 2.5 1.25
Relevance (5 English, Impact of The title
Rubric-1 Marks)
Proposal of The
project
10% of total
grade Relevance of Domain in current era,
(10 Marks) Knowledge about the domain,
Tools Short
Awareness about the Existing work
listing and
done in domain, Open Source, 5 3.75 2.5 1.25
Team
Acceptability and demand of the tool
Composition
(5 Marks) in market, Team members with
different technical knowledge as per
project requirements.

Study about the recent developments,


Understanding of the problem with
Problem scarce knowledge of the relevant
Explicitness material, Clarity about the inputs and
and Affiliated outputs, Study about the recent 5 3.75 2.5 1.25
Rubric-2 Knowledge developments in domain, Knowledge
Project Review about the available solutions of the
Synopsis (5 Marks) similar
10% of total problems, Knowledge about the
grade Evaluation/ Testing Parameters.
(10 Marks)
Newness of the entire solution, Does
Innovation
the approach out-of-the-box,
Quotient (5 5 3.75 2.5 1.25
Correlation between selected
Marks)
technology and proposed solution

Rubric-3
Study about the existing models,
Progress
framework and modelling,
Report –I Project
Modelling (3 Identification of inputs, parameters, 3 2.25 1.5 0.75
(Modelling)
Marks) requirements.
10% of total
Formalization of output parameters
grade
(10 Marks)
Innovation in Newness in modelling, Need of new
Modelling (3 terminologies, Complexity of the 3 2.25 1.5 0.75
Marks) model should be less

Standard Diagrams of the each


phase, Standard Diagrams of the
each component/subsystem, Abstract
Model representation of the model, Solution
Representatio of the problem should feasible using 4 3 2 1
n (4 Marks) the proposed
model/modelling/framework,
Possibility of the solution through the
proposed model.

Project
Completion Implementation is completed,
4 3 2 1
Status Evaluation/Testing is completed
(4 Marks)

Target
Accomplishme Accomplishment of the target as
nt 3 2.25 1.5 0.75
proposed
Rubric-4 Level (3
Progress Report Marks)
–II
(Implementatio
n) Solution All the test cases are executed, Scale
15% of total Validation of the testing parameters are within 4 3 2 1
grade (4 Marks) the expected scale
(15 Marks)

Results of the other existing


approaches are listed, Comparison of
Result the parameters is done, Listing the
Analysis results in proper format, The results 4 3 2 1
(4 Marks) are analyzed in terms of
enhancements of the knowledge, the
variation in results with existing
systems are explained

Rubric-5
Internal Final Content
Project Formatting Safe Assign Report to be checked,
Presentation and and Safe Should be at Low Risk, Format to be
5 3.75 2.5 1.25
Assessment 15% Assign Test strictly followed, Organization of
of total grade Report chapters are suitable and in order.
(15 Marks) (5 Marks)
Communication Skills, Formatting of
Presentation PPTs, organization of project-
5 3.75 2.5 1.25
(5 Marks) explanation in slides, Individual
Participation in Presentation

Each member completes their tasks as


per project plan and Question answer
Viva session on that task completed by
5 3.75 2.5 1.25
( 5 Marks) student. Question and answer on
Results, Outcome and future scope.

External Final
Project Question and answer session on
Presentation and Design, Implementation, new
Assessment 40% NA 40 30 20 10
innovations, outcome and future
of total grade scope
(40 Marks)

Final Grade
(Total)
100% of total NA NA 100 75 50 25
grade
(100 Marks)

The final score shall be normalized out of 60 for final grading.

You might also like