Rubric
Project-I (Seventh Semester) PE702D (Credit: 2)
Remarks Marks (50)
Synopsis submission 05
Review 1 (R1) (Literature Review, Methodology, Experimental Layouts) 05
Review 2 (R2) (Methodology, Experimental Layouts) 10
Pre submission (PS) (Thesis Writing = 10 & Presentation = 5) 15
Final Viva (FV)
15
(Thesis contents = 5, Presentation = 5, External examiner viva = 5)
Project Phase – I Evaluation Scheme
Sl. No. Course Objectives Excellent Good Average
Identification of Detailed and extensive Good explanation of the purpose and Average explanation of the
Problem Domain and explanation of the purpose need of the project (1-3) purpose and need of the project
R1 Detailed analysis of and need of the project (2-3) Good justification to the objectives; (0-2)
Feasibility, Objectives All objectives of the Methodology to be followed is Incomplete justification to the
and Methodology of proposed work are well specified but detailing is not done (1- objectives proposed; Steps are
Project Proposal (05) defined; Steps to be followed 2) mentioned but unclear; without
justification to objectives (0-2)
to solve the defined problem
are clearly specified (1-2)
Design Methodology Division of problem into Division of problem into modules and Division of problem into
(05) modules and good selection good selection of computing modules but inappropriate
Planning of Project of computing framework (2- framework (1-3) selection of computing
Work (05) 4) Design methodology not properly framework (0-2)
Appropriate design justified (1-3) Design methodology not
R2
methodology and properly Time frame properly specified but defined properly (0-2)
justification (2-4) being followed partly (0-1) Time frame properly specified,
Time frame properly but not being followed (0-1)
specified and being followed
(1-2)
PS Incorporation of Changes are made as per Changes are made as per All major changes are made as
Suggestions (08) modifications suggested modifications suggested during R1 per modifications suggested
Project Demonstration during R1 and R2 evaluation and R2 evaluation and good during R1 and R2 evaluation
(07) and new innovations added justification (2-4) (0-3)
(3-5) Each module working well and All defined objectives are
All defined objectives are properly demonstrated (1-3) partially achieved (0-3)
achieved (3-4) Modules are working well in Integration of all modules are
Each module working well isolation and properly demonstrated not done and system working
and properly demonstrated (2-4) is not very satisfactory (0-2)
(2-3)
All modules of project are
well integrated and system
working is accurate (2-3)
FV Project Report (05) Project report is according to Project report is according to the Project report is according to
Description of Concepts the specified format (2-3) specified format (1-2) the specified format but some
and Technical Details References and citations are Complete explanation of the key mistakes (0-1)
(05) appropriate and well concepts but in-sufficient description Incomplete explanation of the
Conclusion and mentioned (2-3) of the technical requirements of the key concepts and in-sufficient
Discussion (05) Complete explanation of the project (1-3) description of the technical
key concepts and strong Results are presented in good manner requirements of the project
description of the technical (1-3) (0-3)
requirements of the project Project work summary and Project work summary and
(2-5) conclusion not very appropriate (1-3) conclusion not very appropriate
Results are presented in very (0-3)
appropriate manner (2-4)
