Chapter 4&5 - 2
Chapter 4&5 - 2
Chapter I
Inteoduction
School facilities improve the quality of the study environment in the school, thus
improving the quality of education. School facilities have the important role to ensure
the quality of teaching and learning with respect to achieve quality of education. The
The quality of school facilities affects students in two ways. Firstly, a lack of facilities
limits the ability of a student to achieve various learning and extra curricula activities.
Secondly, a lack of facilities has a negative impact on a teachers’ job satisfaction, which
undermines their motivation to teach. (Fresco News Under Industry News, 2019)
A growing body of research has found that school facilities can have a profound impact
on both teacher and student outcomes. With respect to teachers, school facilities affect
achievement. Thus, researchers generally conclude that without adequate facilities and
The school facility is much more than a passive container of the educational process: it
is, rather, an integral component of the conditions of learning. The layout and design of
members. Depending on the quality of its design and management, the facility can
designing, or managing the school facility, these facets of place experience should, when
modernization. This is a far broader need than the typical concern over creating an
infrastructure for technology. Many schools built in the past do not provide adequate
space resources for the way schools educate children in the early twenty-first century.
Efforts to reduce class size across the nation along with growth in the number of
students have placed a burden on school facilities and increased the demand for more
maximize learning often require additional square footage in each classroom. For
example, in elementary schools, the traditional room full of tables has often been
replaced by a room with desks on one side and a large carpet in another part of the
room where students sit on the floor for certain activities. Some rooms have special
corners for computers or for quiet reading activities. All of this requires additional space
The purpose of this study is to explore and determine the impact of lack of facilities to
selected student studying BS Criminology in Marawi City. The focused of this study is to
give the reader sufficient information regarding the impact of lack of facilities in terms
Theoretical Framework
This study was anchored from different theorist and concept that play significant role in
the formulation of the study. The researchers considered these theories that directly
explain the major concept involve in the research.
Jean Piaget's Constructivism Theory
He indicate that humans create knowledge through the interaction between their
experiences and ideas. His view of constructivism is the inspiration for radical
constructivism due to his idea that the individual is at the center of the knowledge
creation and acquisition process.
John Dewey's Pragmatism Theory
He believe that reality must be experienced. From Dewey's educational point of view,
this means that students must interact with their environment in order to adapt and learn.
Dewey felt the same idea was true for teachers and that teachers and students must learn
together. His view of the classroom was deeply rooted in democratic ideals, which
promoted equal voice among all participants in the learning experience.
Conceptual Framework
1.1 on the next page elaborates the schematic diagram of the conceptual framework of the
study. This study focused on the impact of lack of facilities to selected students studying
BS Criminology. As shown, on the diagram, the profile served as independent variables
this are the gender and age. The impact of lack of facilities in terms of cognitive domain,
psychomotor domain, and affective domain served as dependent variable. These variable
were collected and used as the basis for drawing some implications.
4
• Cognitive Domain C
• Psychomotor Domain A
Figure 1. The Schematic Diagram of theDomain
• Affective conceptual framework of the study.
T
Chapter II
This chapter deals with the review of related literature and studies that where analysing
data. For RL it is talk about lack of the facilities, cognitive domain, psychomotor domain,
and affective domain. And for RS is about to other study that related to this studies.
Related Literature
School facilities
8
recruitment and retention. More importantly, they also affect the health, behaviour and
engagement of the students. Thus, adequate facilities make it easier for the school to
deliver better education. According to the US General Accounting Office (GAO) almost
schools, about one-third of schools had need of extensive repair or replacement and
almost two-thirds had at least one inadequate building feature such as substandard
physical security.
Cognitive Domain
Piaget's (1936, 1950) theory of cognitive development explains how a child constructs a
mental model of the world. He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was a fixed
trait, and regarded cognitive development as a process which occurs due to biological
maturation and interaction with the environment. Children’s ability to understand, think
about and solve problems in the world develops in a stop-start, discontinuous manner
Psychomotor Domain
rage from manual tasks, such as digging a ditch or washing a car, to more complex tasks,
should engage in activities that the requires movement because they learn by doing
(Favre, 2009).
Affective Domain
It includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings,
1973).
Related Studies
Vert V., Perrsky, B., DeWitt, D., Fischer, J. (2011) conducted a study entitled "The impact
of school facilities on the learning environment". The research design used in this study
is mixed method research design. The findings of this study had implications for setting
policies and practices regarding the funding formula, planning, and design of school
Robert Scott Mcgowen (2007) conducted a study entitled "The impact of facilities on
student achievement, attendance, behavior, completion rate and teacher turn-over rate
in selected Texas high school". Researcher used descriptive research design method.
The findings of this study is educators would be able to provide descriptions of how the
physical environment has impacted their performance and that of their students.
Quantitative studies similar to this research should consider expanding the study
population to gather larger study samples. This may assist in providing more statistically
10
significant data. It would also provide practitioners with more readily applied
conclusions across similar populations. Future studies would provide greater impact by
performance data.
Ainon Ramli & Rosmaizura Mohd Zain (2019) conducted a study entitled "The impact of
questionnaire to gather data. The finding of this study was refine the questionnaire
before the actual distribution took place. By performing a pilot study, any potential
problems in the pro forma questionnaire can be identified and corrected or modified
Schools of Nursing in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria". The researcher used Ex-post facto
School Library and Academic Achievement of Student Nurses in Human Biology The
student nurses in Human Biology revealed that there is significant positive relationship
between the variables (Table 5). However, library is the heartbeat of any academic
teaching-learning process. It forms one of the most important educational services. The
educational process functions in a world of books. The chief purpose of a school library
is to make available to teachers and students at their easy convenience, all books,
11
periodicals and other reproduced materials which are of interest and value to them. As
Chapter III
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
This chapter present a description of the research design, locale of the study, data
gathering procedure, research instruments, and statistical tools.
Research Design
In this study, the researchers used a structured questionnaire (The use of structured
questionnaires A typical example of a structured questionnaire is the Census
questionnaire, which collects demographic information from individuals) research
design method. This research design method used to explore and determine the impact
of lack of the facilities to selected students studying BS Criminology course. The
researchers conducted a survey questionnaire to fulfill the objective of this study.
Locale of the Study
The researcher conducted the study in Marawi City. The researchers choose the locale
since it relates or similar to this study. This conserves the Bangsamoro Muslim Region of
the Meranaos.
12
Where:
14
P = percentage
F = frequency
N = the total number of resondents
100% = constant
2. Standard Deviation. A measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of
values. A low standard deviation indicates that the values tend to be close to the mean
of the set, while a high standard deviation indicates that the values are spread out over
a wider range.
Formula:
Where:
SD = standard deviation
3. Weight mean. This tool is an average computed by giving different weights to some
of the individual values.
Formula:
Where:
W = weight average
N = number of terms to be average
Wi = weights applied to x value
Xi = data values to be
15
Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSES AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presented, analyzed and interpreted the gathered data. The
presentation analysis and interpretation of data were illustrated with tables and explained
in the same order.
Part I. The demographic profile of the respondents
Age Frequency Percentage
Between 15-20 years old 19 31.7
Between 21-25 years old 37 61.7
Between 26-30 years old 4 6.7
Between 30 years old 0 0.0
Above
Total 60 100.0
Table 1 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the respondents’ Age
Table 1 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondent's Age. As shown,
nineteen (19) or 31.7% are in the age bracket of 15-20 years old. Thirty seven (37) or
61.7% are the respondents at 21-25 years old. And four (4) or 6.7% are the respondents at
16
26-30 years old. And for 30 years old above is zero (0) respondents with the of 0.00%
percent.
The finding signifies that majority of the respondents belong to the age of 21-25 with the
percentage of 61.7%, which is the criminology students in Marawi City. They are on the
right age, this according to (Ede, 2004 et.al), there is still debate among these
professional over what effect school entrance age has on student's academic achievement.
Table 2 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondent's sex. As shown,
forty two (42) or 70.0% of the respondents are male. On the other hand, eighteen (18) or
30 0% of the respondents are female.
The finding revealed that majority of the respondents are male with the percentage of
70.0%. This implies that male are dominating in the schools, and they are most interested
to take criminology course. Thus, according to (Lerner's 2001) gender may also have
conceptual under pinning's linked to student's academic success.
17
Table 3
Mean Rank and Descriptive Rating of the Impact of the Lack of Facilities to
Selected Students Studying BS Criminology in Marawi City in terms of Cognitive
Domain
Std. Descriptive
Indicator Mean Deviation Rank Rating
Does school facilities give you more 2.45 .699 1 Yes
knowledge?
Have you suggested to your teacher to present 2.13 .700 2 Sometimes
an equipment for your lesson?
As a criminology student, can you enumerate 2.08 .766 3 Sometimes
the parts of a gun?
Are you satisfied of what you learned without 2.05 .699 4 Sometimes
an equipment?
Will you understand a lesson if there is an 2.03 .758 5 Sometimes
equipment being presented as an example?
Does school facilities improve your learning? 2.00 .689 6 Sometimes
Have you experienced using an equipment in 1.95 .746 7 Sometimes
your learning?
Do you often use facilities in your learning? 1.93 .710 8.5 Sometimes
Do you feel comfortable in listening to a 1.93 .841 8.5 Sometimes
discussion without an equipment being
presented?
If there are no facilities, will you learn your 1.87 .769 10 Sometimes
lesson enough?
Average Mean 2.04 Sometimes
Scaling:
2.36 – 3.00 Yes
1.68 – 2.35 Sometimes
1.00 – 1.67 No
Table 3 shows the mean, rank and descriptive rating of the respondents' perceived the
impact of lack of facilities on cognitive domain. As shown, first ranked the respondents
illustrated that they are "yes" affected by the following: The school facilities give them
18
more knowledge. Whereas, from 2nd-10th shown the respondent's illustrated that they are
"sometimes" affected by the following: they suggested on their teacher to present an
equipment for their lessons; they can enumerate the parts of gun; they are satisfied of
what they learned without an equipment; they will understand a lesson if there's an
equipment being presented as an example; the school facilities improve their learning;
they experienced using an equipment in their learning; they are comfortable in listening
to a discussion without an equipment being presented; and if there's no facilities, they
will learn their lesson enough.
In general, it implies that the respondents are "yes" affected by lack of facilities in terms
of cognitive domain with the mean of 2.45. This just means that facilities give them more
knowledge in a way that they can learn through class discussion with an equipment
presented. According to Piaget's (1936, 1950), he disagreed with the idea that
intelligence was a fixed trait, and regarded cognitive development as a process which
occurs due to biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
Table 4
Mean Rank and Descriptive Rating of the Impact of the Lack of Facilities to
Selected Students Studying BS Criminology in Marawi City in terms of
Psychomotor Domain
Std. Descriptive
Indicator Mean Deviation Rank Rating
Do you want to experience how to hold an 2.25 .728 1 Sometimes
equipment to gain a knowledge?
Have you tried to use a lie detector machine? 2.17 .827 2 Sometimes
As a criminology student, have you practiced 2.12 .666 3 Sometimes
using a gun?
Are you comfortable to try to use a 2.10 .817 4 Sometimes
microscope?
Were you trained to make a photo enlarger? 2.05 .790 5.5 Sometimes
Do you believe that equipment is important to 2.05 .746 5.5 Sometimes
try on?
Do you agree that training is the best to learn 2.02 .770 7 Sometimes
quickly?
Have you practice to identity the fingerprints? 1.93 .686 8.5 Sometimes
Do you know how to assemble a gun properly? 1.93 .778 8.5 Sometimes
Have you experienced polygraph machine? 1.83 .785 10 Sometimes
Average Mean 2.05 Sometimes
Scaling:
2.36 – 3.00 Yes
1.68 – 2.35 Sometimes
1.00 – 1.67 No
19
Table 4 shows the mean, rank and descriptive rating of the impact of lack of facilities in
terms of psychomotor domain. As shown, first ranked the respondents illustrated that
they are "sometimes" affected by the following: they want to experience how to use an
equipment to gain a knowledge. However, from 2nd-10th also illustrated that they are
"sometimes" affected by the following: they tried to use lie detector machine; have they
practice a gun; are they comfortable to try to use a microscope; they trained to make a
photo enlarger; they believe that equipment is important to try on; they believe that
training is the best way to learn quickly; they practiced to identity the fingerprints; they
know how to assemble a gun; they experienced polygraph machine.
In general, it implies that the respondents are "sometimes" affected by lack of facilities in
terms of psychomotor domain with the mean 2.25. This just mean that facilities or
equipment is need to try on or it useful in learning in a way that they are prefer to learn
through actual activities. According to Simpson (1972) it includes physical movement,
coordination, and use of the motor-skill areas. Development of these skills requires
practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or
techniques in execution.
Table 5
Mean Rank and Descriptive Rating of the Impact of the Lack of Facilities to
Selected Students Studying BS Criminology in Marawi City in terms of Affective
Domain
Std. Descriptive
Indicator Mean Deviation Rank Rating
If there's an equipment, does it boost your 2.23 .767 1 Sometimes
learning capability?
If there are facilities, are you active in class? 2.18 .725 2 Sometimes
Do you comfortable in your learning even 2.15 .860 3.33 Sometimes
without facilities?
Do you feel incompetent without facilities in 2.15 .709 3.33 Sometimes
your learning?
Do you like to study when there are materials 2.15 .777 3.33 Sometimes
you can use?
Do you feel confident in your study when 1.98 .770 6 Sometimes
there are equipments to try on?
Did you compete with your classmates during 1.92 .766 7 Sometimes
class discussion?
Are you enjoying your class discussion when 1.90 .775 8 Sometimes
it is coupled with demonstration on how to use
a particular equipment?
Do you feel annoyed in your study? 1.88 .739 9 Sometimes
If there's no facilities, do you feel bored? 1.83 .693 10 Sometimes
20
Table 5 shows the mean, rank and descriptive rating of the impact of lack of facilities in
terms of affective domain. As shown, first ranked the respondents illustrated that they are
"sometimes" affected by the following: the equipment boost their learning capability.
Moreover, from 2nd-10th also illustrated that they are "sometimes" affected by the
following: they are active in class if there's an equipment used; they are comfortable in
their learning without an equipment; they feel incompetent without facilities in their
learning; they like to study when there's materials they can use; they feel confident in
their studies when there's an equipment to try on; they compete in with their
classmates during the discussion; they enjoy in class discussion when instructor
demonstrate on how to use an equipment properly; they feel annoyed in their studies; if
there's no facilities, they feel bored.
To sum up, it implies that the respondents are "sometimes" affected by lack of facilities
in terms of affective domain with the mean 2.23. This just mean that equipment boost
their learning capability in a way that they pursue to learn if there's an equipment
presented. According to Krathwohl, Bloom, Masia, (1973) it includes the manner in
which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings, values, appreciation,
enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes.
Table 6
Summary of the Impact of the Lack of Facilities to Selected Students Studying BS
Criminology in Marawi City
Descriptive
Indicator Mean Rank Rating
Psychomotor Domain 2.05 1 Sometimes
Cognitive Domain 2.04 2 Sometimes
Affective Domain 2.04 3 Sometimes
Grand Mean 2.04 Sometimes
Scaling:
2.36 – 3.00 Yes
1.68 – 2.35 Sometimes
1.00 – 1.67 No
21
Table 6 shows that the summary of the respondent's impact of lack of facilities. As
shown, first ranked with the mean 2.05 shows that the respondents are "sometimes"
affected by the lack of facilities in terms of psychomotor domain. Whereas, the second
ranked with mean 2.04 shows that the respondents are "sometimes" affected by the lack
of facilities in terms of cognitive domain. On the other hand, the third ranked with same
mean 2.04 on second ranked shows that the respondents are "sometimes" affected by the
lack of facilities in terms of affective domain.
In general, it implies that the respondents are "sometimes" by the lack of facilities in
terms of psychomotor domain with the mean 2.05. this just mean that psychomotor
domain was the most affected factors. According to Favre (2009) Student should engage
in activities that the requires movement because they learn by doing.
22
Chapter 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, IMPLICATIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusion, implications and
recommendations of the study.
Summary
The impact of lack of facilities makes it difficult for the students to experience and gain a
knowledge. School facilities is very useful or valuable to the students, they can gain some
ideas, or knowledge, and they can experience the importance of an equipment, and they
are motivated to learn. The main problem of the study is to find out the impact of lack of
facilities to selected students studying BS Criminology in Marawi City. Particularly, this
study answered the following questions: what is the respondent's profile bin terms of age
and sex; what is the impact of lack of facilities in terms of cognitive domain,
psychomotor domain, and affective domain; what implications can be drawn from the
study?
To answer the above questions, a self-made questionnaire were used. These questionnaire
were structured-survey questionnaire type. The first questionnaire were designed to
gather information about the respondent's profile. The second dea with the impact of lack
of facilities to selected students.
Findings
Based on the gathered data, the following is the major findings of the study:
1. Majority or 61.7% of the respondents are belong to the bracket 20-25 years old;
2. Majority of 70.0% of the respondents are male;
3. The respondents illustrate that they are "yes" on facilities give them more knowledge
but it affected by the lack of facilities in terms of cognitive domain with the mean 2.45
because there's no enough facilities provided in class.
4. The respondents illustrate that they are "sometimes" want to hold an equipment to
learn or gain a knowledge but it affected by lack of facilities in terms of psychomotor
domain with the mean 2.25 due to there's no enough facilities used.
5. The respondents illustrate that they are "sometimes" boosted in learning capability
through school facilities but it affective by lack of facilities with the mean 2.23 because
there's no school facilities provided to used.
6. The summary of the respondents impact of lack of facilities to selected students
studying BS Criminology in Marawi City, it implies that they are "sometimes" affected by
lack of facilities in terms of psychomotor domain with the mean 2.05, this just mean
that student should engage in physical activities because they learn by doing.
Conclusion
23
Based on the findings, the selected students studying BS Criminology in Marawi City
were belong to the twenty one to twenty five (21-25) years old; male has fourthy two (42)
gathering percentage of seventy point zero (70.0%). In terms of the impact of lack of
facilities, it shows that the psychomotor domain was the most affected factors.
Implications
From the findings, implications were drawn:
The highest percentage in age profile belongs to 20-25 yearsbold and majority of the
respondents were male who are most interested to take criminology course. In addition,
the findings of the respondents are "sometimes" affected by the cognitive domain
because it involves the intellectual abilities of the students, they can recall the ideas or
facts if there's an example or equipment presented. In psychomotor domain, they are
"sometimes" affected because they learn by doing. And in affective domain, they are
"sometimes" affected because school facilities boost their learning capability.
In short, most of the respondents were "sometimes" affected by the three factors.
Recommendation
On the basis of present study, some of the recommendation are drawn as follows:
1. Student's skills must not be affected by lack of facilities to learn ang gain a more
knowledge.
2. The stake holder of education (i.e teachers, school head or administrator, and
government) must maintain or provide a facilities for the students to have enough or
high quality of education.
3. Parents should guide, motivate, and care their children to engage them to learn or
study more.
4. Future researcher shall get factual information from this research study with have
major basis as support to their study.
Bibliography
Aechieval Andrews (2019.How school facilities improve a child's school experience.
Under University News.Bert Vandiever.Dissertation/Thesis-Doctoral
Dissertation.https://www.fresconews.com
Enrryson Sebastian (2011).The impact of school facilities on the learning
environment.174pages.By Bert Bandiver.Capella
24
Appendix A
Bangsamoro Autonomous Region Muslim Mindanao
Ministry of Basic, Higher and Technical Education
Philippine Muslim Teachers' College
Bachelor of Science in Criminology
037 Bo. Green, Marawi City
________________________________________________________________________
________
March 03, 2021
25
PMTC Administration
037 Barrio Green, Marawi City
Lanao Del Sur, BARMM, Philippines
The Researchers,
Mapandi, Mohammad Albanie A.
Rascal, Mohammad Hafiz O.
Approved by:
School Administrator
Appendix B
Bangsamoro Autonomous Region Muslim Mindanao
Ministry of Basic, Higher and Technical Education
Philippine Muslim Teachers' College
Bachelor of Science in Criminology
037 Bo. Green, Marawi City
26
________________________________________________________________________
________
March 03, 2021
PMTC Administration
037 Barrio Green, Marawi City
Lanao Del Sur, BARMM, Philippines
Dear Respondents,
Good day and Assalamu Allaikum!
We, the undersigned students of Philippine Muslim Teachers' College would like to ask
for permission to allow us to conduct a survey from you about "THE IMPACT OF LACK
OF FACILITIES TO SELECTED STUDENTS STUDYING BS CRIMINOLOGY IN MARAWI CITY
A.Y 2020-2021". The survey will last only about 5 to 10 minutes. Rest assured that the
data gathered will remain confidential and for academic purpose only. We are hoping
that this request will merit your favorable approval.
Thank you and God blessed!
The Researchers,
Mapandi, Mohammad Albanie A.
Rascal, Mohammad Hafiz O.
Approved by:
Appendix C
The impact of the lack of facilities to selected students studying
BS Criminology in Marawi City
A.Y 2020-2021
27
Part II.
Instructions: Please put a check (✔️) in the box ☑️space provided using the scale given
below.
3. No
2. Sometimes
1. Yes
Cognitive Domain
1. Does school facilities give you more
knowledge?
2. Does school facilities improve your
learning?
3. Do you often use facilities in your
learning?
4. Will you understand a lesson if there is
an equipment being presented as an
example?
5. Do you feel comfortable in listening to a
discussion without an equipment being
28
Cognitive Domain
presented?
6. As a criminology students, can you
enumerate the parts of a gun?
7. If there are no facilities, will you learn
your lesson enough?
8. Have you suggested to your teacher to
present an equipment for your lesson?
9. Are you satisfied of what you learned
without an equipment?
10. Have you experienced using an
equipment in your learning?
Psychomotor Domain
1. Have you tried to use a lie detector
machine?
2. Have you practice to identity the
fingerprints?
3. Are you comfortable to try to use a
microscope?
4. As a criminology student, have you
practiced using a gun?
5. Do you know how to assemble a gun
properly?
6. Have you experienced polygraph
machine?
7. Were you trained to make a photo
enlarger?
8. Do you believe that equipment is
important to try on?
9. Do you agree that training is the best to
learn quickly?
10. Do you want to experience how to
29
Psychomotor Domain
hold an equipment to gain a knowledge?
Affective Domain
1. Do you comfortable in your learning
even without facilities?
2. Do you feel incompetent without
facilities in your learning?
3. Do you feel annoyed in your study?
4. If there's no facilities, do you feel
bored?
5. Do you like to study when there are
materials you can use?
6. If there are facilities, are you active in
class?
7. Are you enjoying your class discussion
when it is coupled with demonstration on
how to use a particular equipment?
8. If there's an equipment, does it boost
your learning capability?
9. Do you feel confident in your study
when there are equipments to try on?
10. Did you compete with your classmates
during class discussion?
Curriculum Vitae
30
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Name: Mohammad Hafiz Olama Rascal
Nickname: Hafiz
Age: 23
Date of Birth: February 24, 1998
Civil Status: Married
Spouse: Sittie Farmidah P. Pamnagun
Address: Pangapon stree., Panggao Saduc, Marawi City
Father's name: Mr. Waidah Bacaraman Rascal
Mother's name: Samsia Usman Olama-Rascal
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Amai Pakpak Central Elementary School (2009-2010)
High School: MSU-Lanao National College Art and Trade (2013-2014)
Tertiary: Philippine Muslim Teacbers' College (2020-2021)
Curriculum Vitae
31
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Name: Mohammad Albanie Andor Mapandi
Nickname: BANZKIE
Age: 23
Date of Birth: October 31, 1998
Civil Status: Single
Address: Poblacion, Tangcal, Lanao Del Norte
Father's name: Minsuare D. Mapandi
Mother's Name: Noronisa M. Andor
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary: Banisilon Central Elementary School
High School: Tangcal National High School
Tertiary: Philippine Muslim Teachers' College