Residential Building
Residential Building
General –
Requirement for residential accommodation are different for different classes of
people & depends on the income & status of the individual, a highly rich family with
require a luxurious building, while a poor man be satisfied with a single room house for
even poor class family. No hard fast rule can be fixed for the design of building but for
general guidance the following information may be helpful.
For residential building the liveable area (carpet area) should be 50% to 65% of the
plinth area with the target of 65%. The circulation area should be minimum possible
depending on the climatic condition of the region.
A standard residential building of bungalow type with has drawing room, dining
room office room, guest room, kitchen room, store, pantry, dressing room, bath room, front
veranda, stair etc., for other house the number of rooms may be reduced according to the
requirements of many available.
Objectives:-
The objective of this study is to design a residential building. The study
specifically focuses on assessing the role of the building envelope in relation to comfort air
conditioning systems and appliances in achieving energy efficiency in dwellings.
This study answers the following sub-objectives:
1. To determine the severity of growth rates in energy consumption in this sector and
identify the savings potentials.
2. To design a residential building with the help of help auto cad and design its load.
Arrangement of rooms and their position:
Drawing room: drawing room should be well lighted and ventilated and located in the
heart of the building in the front having across from all the main room.
Dining room: this room should be closed to the drawing room by its side or in the rear and
should be rear, and should be near to the pantry.
The common wall in b/w the drawing room and dining room may be designed in such a
way that both the room may be converted into hall on special occasion.
Bed room: It should be located on the side of the building with the least on wall exposed
to the outer space for ventilation and light. They should be placed on the side of the
prevailing wind with sufficient window.
Office room: it should be placed on the side on the front verandah, disconnected with
other room. This is for one’s professional work and may be used study room.
Guest room: this room similar to office room.
Kitchen: It should be placed in the rear of the building in one corner opposite side the
direction of the prevailing wind.
1
CHAPTER: 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
• Neelam Sharma (2016): Reinforced cement concrete design, reprint of first edition
January 2016, S.K.Kataria & sons p. ltd., Prakash mahal, Dr. subhash bhargav lane,
daryaganj, New Delhi.
• B.N. Dutta, Estimating and costing in civil engg., twenty-seventh revised edition.,
UBSPD publisher pvt.ltd., daryaganj, New Delhi.
• Dr. B.c. Punamia., Ashok kumar jain, Dr. Arun K. jain, Reinforced concrete
structures., Tenth edition., laxmi publication pvt. Ltd., golden house., daryaganj,
New Delhi
• IS:875 (part 3)-1987., A commentary on Indian standard code of practice for design
load(other than earthquake) for building and structure.
• IS 456:2000., Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice(fourth revision)
• IS 800:2007., General construction in steel – code of practice (third revision)
CHAPTER: 3 MATERIAL & METHODOLOGY
3.1. About material
i) Cement
ii) Brick
iii) Steel
iv) Course aggregate
v) Fine
aggregate
vi)Sand.
3.2. Methods
Limit state method: the working stress method gives satisfactory performance at working
load but no attention is given to the condition that arise at the time of collapse of the
structure. The method does not give exact margin of safety. This draw back was taken into
account in the ultimate load or load factor method of design. But load factor method leads
to excessive deflection and cracking. A more rational approach is given by limit state
method of design which is a balanced combination of working stress and ultimate load
design method. The limit state method of design is discussed in section 5 of IS Coad
456:2000.
In this method, this method is based on the actual stress-strain curve of steel and concrete.
For concrete the stress-strain curve is nonlinear. Partial safety factors are applied to get
design values of stress. Design load are obtained by multiplying partial safety factors of
load to the working loads.
3.3 Designing steps
i) Design step for beam
Design or factored load
Design moment and design shear
Limiting moment of resistance
Area of compression steel
Area of steel
Check for deflection
Design of shear
4.1. GENERAL –
In this chapter we have been discussed about the different design member of the building.
Assuming 𝐷 = 200𝑚𝑚
𝑑 = 200 − 15 − 6 = 179 = 180𝑚𝑚 (Assuming clear cover as 15 mm and 8 mm as
the dia. Of main bar)
Effective span:-
Effective span in x-direction:
i. 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 6 + .3 = 6.3𝑚
ii. 𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 + 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 6 + .161 = 6.161𝑚
31.46×10
=√ 6 = 106.76 ≈ 107 𝑚𝑚
2.76×103
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 (1 − )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 . 𝑏𝑑
415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡
31.46 × 106 = 0.87 × 415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 180 [ ]
1000 × 220 × 20
31.46 × 106 = 64989𝐴𝑆𝑇 − 7.48𝐴2𝑆𝑇
2
𝐴𝑆𝑇 − 8688.36𝐴𝑠𝑡 + 4205882.3 = 0
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 514 𝑚𝑚2
𝜋
2
Using 8 mm Ø 𝐴∅ = × 82 = 50.3 𝑚𝑚
4
1000 × 𝐴∅ 1000 × 50.3
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = = = 98 𝑚𝑚
𝐴𝑠𝑡 514
(98 mm spacing is less than 3d and 300
mm)
0.12 .12
𝐴 = 𝑏𝐷 = × 1000 × 200 = 288 𝑚𝑚2 > 240𝑚𝑚2 Hence OK.
𝑠𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛 100 100
:-provided 8 mm Ø @180 mm 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 in the middle strip of width 3.9 m.
(ii) Along longer span in Y-direction (middle strip):-
33
𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝 = (4). 𝑙𝑥 = × 5.16 = 3.87 𝑚
4
𝑑 = 180 − 4 − 5 = 171 𝑚𝑚
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 (1 − )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 . 𝑏𝑑
415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡
33.47 × 106 = 0.87 × × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 𝑑 × (1 − )
𝑓𝑦 1000 × 171 × 20
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 583.40 𝑚𝑚
1000×50.3
Spacing of 8mm dia. bars= = 86𝑚𝑚
583.40
Using 8 mm Ø bars @ 230 mm c/c in the edge strip of width 1 6.16 − 3.87 = 1.145 𝑚 along
2
X-direction and edge strip of width 1 (5.16 − 3.87) = 0.36 𝑚 along Y-direction.
2
40640
𝑟𝑣 𝑉𝑢 = = 0.23 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
= 1000 ×
𝑏𝑑 171
100𝐴𝑠𝑡 100 × 514
𝑃𝑡 = = = 0.23%
𝑏𝑑 1000 × 180
For 𝑃𝑡 = 0.23 and M20 concrete,
0.36 − 0.28
𝑟𝑐 = 0.28 + × (0.21 − 0.15)
0.25 − 0.15
= 0.32 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
For 180 mm thickness of slab K = 1.24
𝑟𝑐 = 0.32 × 1.24 = 0.40 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2 > 𝑟𝑐
So, Shear reinforcement is not required.
Check for deflection:-
𝑃𝑡 = 0.23%
𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝑓𝑠 = 0.58𝑓𝑦 ( )
𝐴 𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒
514
= (0.58 × 415) ] = 240.7𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
[ 514
𝑙 𝑙
() >( ) = ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑘
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
Area of torsional
reinforcement
3
= × 514 = 385.5 𝑚𝑚2
4
𝑙𝑦
7
𝑙𝑥 = > 2 (ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 )
2.5
Assuming total depth =150mm
D =150 − 20 − 5
d =125 mm [clear cover 20 mm ∅ 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 = 10𝑚𝑚]
2.625×2.625
= 13.125 × 8 = 11.30𝐾𝑁/𝑚
Mu = 11.30 × 106 𝑁𝑚𝑚
Effective Depth Required
𝑥𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑥
= 0.48
𝑑
𝑥𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑥𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑅𝑢 = 0.36. 𝑓𝑐𝑘. (1 − 0.42. )
𝑑 𝑑
𝑅𝑢 = 0.36 × 20 × 0.48(1 − 0.42 × 0.48) = 2.76
11.30 × 1000000
𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑞 = √ = 63.98𝑚𝑚
2.76 × 1000
1000×𝐴∅
Spacing of 6 mm 𝜙 𝑏𝑎𝑟 =
𝐴𝑠𝑡
1000×28.3
= 210 = 134.6 𝑚𝑚
100 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑃𝑡 =
𝑏𝑑
100 × 576
𝑃𝑡 = = 0.4%
1000 × 125
𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 0.58. 𝑓𝑦 [ ]
𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒
576
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 0.58 × 415 [ ]
576
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 240𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑡 = 0.4%, 𝑓𝑠 = 240 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2, 𝑘𝑡 = 1.55
𝑙
() = (20 × 𝑘𝑡) = 20 × 1.5 = 31
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑙 2625
( ) =( ) = 29
𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒 12
𝑙 𝑙 5
( ) >( ) , hence ok.
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒
A𝑠𝑡. f𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. f𝑦. A𝑠𝑡. d [1 − ]
bd. f𝑐𝑘
415 × 288
6
0.87 × 415 × 288 × 125 (1 −
20 × 1000 × 125) = 12.37 × 10 𝑁𝑚𝑚
𝑣𝑢 = 16400𝑁
𝑙0 = 0
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑛𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠
𝑀1 12.37 × 1000000
( ) + 𝑙0 = = 754𝑚𝑚
𝑉 16400
0.87×415×10
𝐿d = 4×1.2×1.6 = 470𝑚𝑚
𝑀1
( ) + 𝑙 0 > 𝐿𝑑
𝑉
𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑
4.2.3. Decimation of slab - 4 × 5 m
𝑙𝑦 5
= = 1.25 < 2, ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑤𝑜 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏.
𝑙𝑥 4
Assuming
d= 180 – 15 -4 = 160mm (assuming clear cover as 15mm and 8mm as the dia.
Of main bar)
Effective span
Effective span in X-direction:
i) 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 = 4 + 0.3 = 4.3 𝑚
ii) Clear span + effective depth = 4 + 0.161 = 4.161 𝑚
𝑙𝑥 = 4.161 𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑦 = 5.161 𝑚
. 079
𝛼𝑥 = .072 + × (1.25 − 1.2)
1.3 − 1.2
𝛼𝑥 = 0.075
𝛼𝑦 = 0.056
𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒒 𝑀𝑢
= √𝑟𝑢.𝑏
(18.5 × 106)
√ = 82 𝑚𝑚
(2.75 × 103)
d=161mm
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 (1 − )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 . 𝑏𝑑
1000A∅ 1000×50.3
Spacing = 𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 332
𝐴𝑠𝑡 1000×50.3
= = 335 > 216 𝑚𝑚2Hence ok
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 150
Spacing = 1000×50.3
= 232mm (spacing is less than 5d or 450 mm)
216
Using 8 mm Ø bars @ 230 mm c/c in the edge strip of width 1 (5.16 − 3.9) i.e., 1.04 m
2
along X- direction and edge strip of width (4.16 − 3.12) i.e., 0.52 m along Y- direction.
1
2
= 0.33 N/mm2
For 180 mm thickness of slab k = 1.24
𝑟𝑐= 0.33 × 1.24 = 0.41 N/mm2 > 𝑟𝑐
∴ Shear reinforcement is not required.
Check for deflection
𝑃𝑡 = 0.21 %
𝑓𝑠 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞
= 0.58𝑓𝑦 (𝐴 )
𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒
333
= 0.58 × 415 × [ ] = 240 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
348
𝑘𝑡 = 1.6
𝑙
( ) = 20 × 1.6 = 32.
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑙 416
() 1 = 26
𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =
161
𝑙 𝑙
( ) > ( ) Hence OK.
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
𝑙𝑦 4.5
= = 1.125, 1.125 < 2
𝑙𝑥 4
4000
D=180 mm [Assuming 𝑙
= 25 , 𝑑 = = 160 𝑚𝑚]
𝑑 25
𝑑 = 180 − 15 − 4 = 161 𝑚𝑚
(Assuming clear cover 15mm & 8mm as diameter of main bar)
Effective span –
Effective span at X-direction
I. 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 = 4 + 0.3 = 4.3 𝑚
II. 𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 + 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 4 + 0.161 = 4.161 𝑚
𝑙𝑥 = 4.161 𝑚
Similarly,
At Y-direction
𝑙𝑦 = 4.66 𝑚
Design load –
𝛼𝑥 0.079−0.072
= 0.072 + × (1.125 − 1.2)
1.3−1.2
𝛼𝑥 = 0.066
𝛼𝑦 = 0.056
𝑙𝑥
𝑣𝑢 = 𝑤𝑢.
2 4.161
= 14.25 × = 29.65 𝐾𝑁
2
𝑀𝑢
𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒒 = √
𝑟𝑢.𝑏
= 78 𝑚𝑚
Here 𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒒 < 𝑑𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑
Hence OK.
Design of main reinforcement
1) Along shorter span in X-direction (middle strip)
3
𝑊𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝 = × 𝑙𝑌
3 5
= × 4.661 = 3.495 ≈ 3.5𝑚
4
𝑑 = 161𝑚
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 (1 − )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 . 𝑏𝑑
𝐴 ×415
16.4 × 106 = 0.87 × 415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 161 × [1 − ( 𝑠𝑡
)]
1000×161×20
𝐴2𝑠𝑡− 7760𝐴𝑠𝑡 + 2189586 = 0
Using 8 mm Ø bars
𝜋
AØ = × 64 = 50.265mm2
4
1000 × 𝐴∅ 1000 ×
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 50.265 = 171.40 ≈ 170 𝑚𝑚
𝐴𝑠𝑡 =
293.25
(Spacing is less than 3d & 300mm)
0.12 0.12
𝐴 = × 𝑏𝑑 = × 1000 × 180 = 216 𝑚𝑚2
𝑠𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛
10 100
0
1000
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = × 50.3 = 296𝑚𝑚2
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
170
So,
Hence OK.
So
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 261mm2
1000×50.3
= 261 = 232 𝑚𝑚
So,
1000×50.3
Spacing = 216 = 232 mm
(Spacing less than 5d & 450
mm)
Using 8 mm Ø bars @ 230 mm c/c in the edge strip of width 1 × (4.66 − 3.55) = 0.58 𝑚
2
along X-direction & edge strip width 1 × (4.16 − 3.12) i.e., 0.52 m along Y-direction.
2
ԏ𝑣 2
= 1000×153 = 0.193 ≈ 0.20 𝑁/𝑚𝑚
29650
100𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑃𝑡 =
𝑏𝑑
100 × 294
𝑃𝑡 = = 0.182%
1000 × 161
For 𝑃𝑡 = 0.18 & M20
concrete,
𝑝𝑡 = 18%
𝑓𝑠 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞
= 0.58𝑓𝑦 (𝐴 )
𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒
294
= 0.58 × 415 ( ) = 210 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
335
For 𝑝𝑡 = 0.18%
𝑘𝑡 = 1.6
𝑙
( ) = 20 × 1.6 = 32
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑙 4161
() = = 26
𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 161
𝑙 𝑙
( ) >( ) Hence OK.
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
Torsional reinforcement at
corners
𝑙𝑥
= 0.832 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 840 𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑒𝑠ℎ 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 = 5
3
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 = × 335 = 251 𝑚𝑚2
4
Using 8 mm Ø 𝜋
bars 𝐴∅ = × 82 = 50.3
4
1000×50.3
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = = 201 𝑚𝑚 ≈ 200 𝑚𝑚
251
Assuming
𝑙
D= 180 mm [𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 25 ≈ 𝑑 = 4500/25 = 180 𝑚𝑚]
𝑑
𝑑 = 180 − 15 − 4 = 161 𝑚𝑚
Effective span
𝑖) 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 = 4.5 + 0.3 = 4.8 𝑚
𝑖𝑖) 𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 + 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 4.5 + 0.161 = 4.661 𝑚
𝑙𝑥 = 4.661 𝑚, 𝑙𝑦 = 5.161 𝑚
𝑙𝑦
𝑓𝑜𝑟 = 1.11
𝑙𝑥
0.072 − 0.064
𝛼𝑥 = 0.064 + × (1.11 − 1.1) = 0.064
1.2 − 1.1
𝛼𝑦 = 0.056
𝑀𝑢𝑥 = 𝛼𝑥. 𝑤𝑢. 𝑙𝑦2
𝑙𝑥
𝑣𝑢 = 𝑤𝑢.
4.661
2
= 15 × = 34.95 𝐾𝑁
2
𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒒 𝑀𝑢
= √𝑟𝑢.𝑏
(20.8 𝑋 1000000)
=√ 2.76 𝑋 1000
d = 161 mm
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 (1 − )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 . 𝑏𝑑
𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 415
20.8 × 106 = 0.87 × 415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 161 [1 − ]
20 × 161 × 1000
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 357.8 𝑚𝑚
Using 8 mm Ø bars
п
A∅ = x 82 = 50.3 mm2
4
1000A∅ 1000×50.3
Spacing = = = 151 mm say 150 mm
𝐴𝑠𝑡 332
(spacing is less than 3d and 300 mm)
0.12 (. 12 x 1000 x
180) = 216 mm2
𝐴 = bD =
𝑠𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛
10 100
0
𝐴𝑠𝑡 1000×50.3
= = 359 > 216 𝑚𝑚2Hence OK.
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 150
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 (1 − )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 . 𝑏𝑑
415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡
18.24 × 106 = 0.87 × 415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 153[1 − ]
20 × 153 × 1000
𝐴𝑠𝑡=330 mm2 > 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛
Spacing = 1000×50.3
= 232 𝑚𝑚ԏ V𝑢 (spacing is less than 5d or
216 𝑣 = bd
450mm)
Using 8 mm Ø bars @ 230 mm c/c in edge strip of width 1 [5.16 – 3.9 ] i.e., 1.04m along
2
X- direction and edge strip of width 1 (4.661 − 3.49 ) i.e., 0.58 m along Y-direction.
2
= 0.33 N/mm2
For 180 mm thickness of slab K = 1.24
𝑟𝑐= 0.33 × 1.24 = 0.41 N/mm2 > 𝑟𝑐
Check for deflection
𝑃𝑡 = 0.21 %
𝑓𝑠 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞
= 0.58𝑓𝑦 (𝐴 )
𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒
333
= 0.58 × 415 × [ ] = 240 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
348
𝑘𝑡 = 1.6
𝑙
( ) = 20 × 1.6 = 32.
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑙 416
() 1 = 26
𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =
161
𝑙 𝑙
( ) > ( ) Hence
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
OK
Torsional reinforcement at corners
𝑙𝑥
𝑀𝑒𝑠ℎ 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 = = 0.832 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 840 𝑚𝑚
5
3
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 = × 335 = 251 𝑚𝑚2
4
Using 8 mm Ø 𝜋
bars 𝐴∅ = × 82 = 50.3
4
1000×50.3
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = = 201 𝑚𝑚 ≈ 200 𝑚𝑚
251
2
𝐴∅ = × 10 = 78.5𝑚𝑚
4
78.5
Spacing of 10mm dia. bars = 1000 × = 10𝑚𝑚2 = 100𝑚𝑚2
7250
0.87×415×10
𝐿d = 4×1.2×1.6 = 470𝑚𝑚
𝑀1 + 𝑙0 > 𝑙𝑑 ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑.
𝑑 = 180 – 15 − 4
Effective span
Effective span in x – direction
= 2.8 m
𝑙𝑦 = 2.161 𝑚
Since the slab is supported on all the four sides and its corners are held down. It correspond to
case 9; table 12.1
= .056
α y = .056
2
𝑀𝑢𝑥 = 𝛼𝑥 𝑤𝑢 𝑙𝑥
= 0.056 × 12 × (2.661)2
= .056 × 12 × (2.661)2
𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑞 = √𝑀𝑢/ 𝑅𝑢 𝑏
= 3/4 × 2.161
= 1.6 𝑚
𝑑 = 161 𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87 𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 [1 − 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑦 /𝑏 𝑑 𝑓𝑐𝑘 ]
4.76 x 106 = 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 161 [1- Ast x 415 /1000 x 161
X 20]
𝐴Ф = п /4 × (8)2
= 50.3 𝑚𝑚2
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝐴Ф /𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 1000
= 50.3 / 768 × 1000
= 65.5 𝑠𝑎𝑦 66 𝑚𝑚 ( 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 3𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 300 𝑚𝑚)
𝑑 = 161
𝑀𝑢 = .87 𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 ( 1 – 𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑡 / 𝑏 𝑑 𝑓𝑐𝑘 )
4.75 × 106 = 0.87 × 415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 1000 [1 − 415 𝐴𝑠𝑡 /1000 × 153 × 20]
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 735 > 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑓 8𝑚𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 = 1000 × 50.3 / 735
3d or 300 mm]
Using 8mm Ф bars @ 230mm c/c in the edge strip of width ½ (2.66-1.6) i.e 1.06m along x- direction
and edge strip of width ½ (2.16-1.99) i.e ,0.77m along y – direction .
Check for
shear
𝑁𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 ԏ𝑣 = 𝑉𝑢 /𝑏𝑑
= 15.96/1000 × 153
= 1.04 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑃𝑟 = 100 𝐴𝑠𝑡 / 𝑏𝑑
= 100 × 762/ 1000 × 161 = 0.47 %
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑟 = 0.47 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑀20 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 5.1
ԏ𝑐 = 0.28 + 0.36 − 0.28 /(0.25 − .15) × (0.47 – 0.21)
= 0.48 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝐹𝑜𝑟 180 𝑚𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝑘 = 1.24 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 5.2
ԏ𝑐 = 0.48 × 1.24
= 0.59 > ԏ𝑐
Shear reinforcement is not required.
𝑃𝑟 = 0.47 %
𝐹𝑠 = 0.58 𝑓𝑦 [𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑞 / 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 ]
= 242 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑔 6.1 𝑘𝑡 = 1.6
( 𝑙/𝑑)𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 20 × 1.6
= 32
(𝑙/𝑑)𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 2661/161 = 16
= 571.5 𝑚𝑚2
Using 8mm Ф bars
𝐴Ф = п/4 × 82 = 50.3
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 1000 × 50.3 /571.5
𝑏 = 300 𝑚𝑚
𝑑 = 450 = 450 − 50 = 400 𝑚𝑚
𝑙 = 4.5 𝑚
Imposed load = 50 KN/m
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 20 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑓𝑦 = 415 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
Using 16 mm Ø bar
Area of one bar = 𝜋 × 162 = 201.06
4
2
= 0.87×415×(400−50) = 510.85 𝑚𝑚
64555020.8
Hence OK.
Design of shear –
Vu = 175.5 KN
𝑉𝑢 175.5×1000
𝑟𝑢 = 𝑏𝑑
= 300×400 = 1.46 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑃𝑡
100×942
= 300×400 = 0.78
For M20 concrete, 𝑃𝑡 = 0.78
𝑟𝑐 = 0.56 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
So, 𝑟𝑢 > 𝑟𝑐 shear reinforcement is to be provided
Shear resistance of reinforcement,
𝑉𝑢𝑠 = 𝑉𝑢 − 𝑟𝑐𝑏𝑑 = 175.5 × 1000 − 0.56 × 300 × 400 = 108300 𝑁
Using 2 legged 8 mm Ø vertical stirrups
𝜋
𝐴𝑠𝑣 = 2 × × 8 × 8 = 100.5 𝑚𝑚 2
4
Spacing of stirrups,
𝑆 0.87 𝑓𝑦.𝐴𝑠𝑣.𝑑 0.87×415×100.5×400
𝑣 = 𝑉𝑢𝑠
= = 160 mm
90520
𝑏 = 300 𝑚𝑚
𝑑 = 450 = 450 − 50 = 400 𝑚𝑚
𝑙 =4𝑚
Imposed load = 50 KN/m
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 20 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑓𝑦 = 415 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑑𝘍 50
= = 0.125, taking higher value of 0.15
𝑑 400
Using 16 mm Ø bar
Area of one bar = 𝜋 × 162 = 201.06
4
𝐴𝑠𝑡1 = 𝑀𝑢 𝑙𝑖𝑚
0.87𝑓 (𝑑 − 0.42𝑋 )
𝑦 𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑥
10 < 21.09
1 1
( ) >( )
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
Hence OK.
Design of shear –
𝑉𝑢 = 160 KN
𝑉𝑢 160.12×1000
𝑟𝑢 = 𝑏𝑑
= 300×400 = 1.33 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑃𝑡
100×942
= 300×400 = 0.78
For M20 concrete, 𝑃𝑡 = 0.78
𝑟𝑐 = 0.58 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
So, 𝑟𝑢 > 𝑟𝑐 shear reinforcement is to be provided
Shear resistance of reinforcement,
𝑉𝑢𝑠 = 𝑉𝑢 − 𝑟𝑐𝑏𝑑 = 160.12 × 1000 − 0.58 × 300 × 400 = 90502 𝑁
Using 2 legged 8 mm Ø vertical stirrups
𝜋
𝐴𝑠𝑣 = 2 × × 8 × 8 = 100.5 𝑚𝑚 2
4
Spacing of stirrups,
𝑆 0.87 𝑓𝑦.𝐴𝑠𝑣.𝑑 0.87×415×100.5×400
𝑣 = 𝑉𝑢𝑠
= = 160 mm
90520
𝑙 =6𝑚
𝑑′ 50
= = 0.12 (𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 0.2 )
𝑑 400
𝑓𝑠𝑐 = 342 N/mm2
Area of compression steel (𝐴𝑠𝑐) –
𝑀𝑢2 59555020.8
𝐴𝑠𝑐 = ( ′
= = 615𝑚𝑚
𝑓𝑠𝑐 𝑑 − 𝑑 ) 342(400 − 50)
Using 16 mm diameter bar 𝜋
= ( ) × 16 × 16 = 201
4
615
No of bars reqd = ( ) = 3.05
201
Provided 3-16 mm bars
𝐴𝑠𝑐=650 mm
Area of steel (𝑨𝒔𝒕) –
𝐴𝑠𝑡1 = 𝑀𝑢 𝑙𝑖𝑚
0.87𝑓 (𝑑 − 0.42𝑋 )
𝑦 𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑥
2
= [0.87×415(400−0.42×192)] = 1148𝑚𝑚
59555020.8
1.14 − 1.08
𝐾𝑐 = 1.08 + × (0.52 − 0.25) = 1.14
0.5 − 0.25
1
() = 20 × 0.87 × 1.14 = 19.83
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥
1 600
( ) = 15 < 19.83
0
= 400
𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
1 1
( ) >( )
𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
Hence OK.
Design of shear –
Vu =195
𝑉𝑢 𝐾𝑁
195×1000
𝑟 = = = 1.625 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑢 𝑏𝑑 300×400
𝑟𝑐 = 2.8 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
𝑟𝑐 𝑚𝑎𝑥 > 𝑟𝑐 Hence OK.
𝜋
𝐴𝑠𝑡 At support = 3 × ( ) 20 × 20 = 942 𝑚𝑚 2
4
𝑃𝑡 100×942
= 300×400 = 0.78
a) 1
× 12 = 3𝑚𝑚
4
b) 6𝑚𝑚
Using 6 mm Ø links.
Pitch of the ties should not exceed the following.
a) Least lateral dimension =300 mm
b) 16 × 12 = 192 mm
c) 300 mm
So, provide 6 mm Ø @ 300 mm c/c.
Area of footing
𝑊𝑢 + 𝑊𝑓 810
𝐴= = = 4.26 𝑚2
𝑞𝑢 190
= 659.2 𝑑
Equating (i) and (ii) we get
527.77 × (0.8 − 𝑑) = 659.2 𝑑
𝑑 = 0.396 𝑚
Depth of footing by two way shear
𝑀𝑢 = 171 × 106𝑁𝑚𝑚
Moment of resistance at critical section:
𝑋𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑥
= 0.48 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅𝑢 = 2.76 For M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel
𝑑
𝑀𝑢 𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 𝑅𝑢 × 𝑏𝑑2
= 2.76 × 2250 × 𝑑2 = 6210d2
Equating (v) and (vi), we get
171 × 1000000 = 6210𝑑2
d = 165.94 mm
d =0.165m
From equation (A, B, C) the highest value of d obtained is 0.396 m.
Let us adopt
d = 400 mm
Overall depth =400+8+50 = 458 mm says 460 mm [taking clear cover =50 mm and 60 mm
dia. Bars]
6. Area of steel reinforcement
𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑓𝑦
𝑀𝑢 = 0.87. 𝑓𝑦. 𝐴𝑠𝑡. 𝑑 [1 −
] 𝑏𝑑.
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 415
]
171 × 1000000 = 0.87 × 415 × 𝐴𝑠𝑡 × 400 [1 −
2250 × 400 × 20
𝐴𝑠𝑡 =1550 mm2
0.12×2250×460
Minimum reinforcement reqd. = = 1242 𝑚𝑚2< 1550 𝑚𝑚2
100
𝜋 2
𝐴∅ = ( ) × 16 × 16 = 201 𝑚𝑚
4
CHAPTER: 5 DESIGN OF PLAN
CHAPTER: 6 CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION: We can conclude that there is difference between the theoretical and
practical work done. As the scope of understanding will be much more when practical
work is done. As we get more knowledge in such a situation where we have great
experience doing the work of designing.
Knowing the loads we have designed the slabs depending upon the ratio of longer to
shorter span of panel. In this project we have designed slabs as two way slabs depending
upon the end condition, corresponding bending moment. The coefficients have been
calculated as per I.S. code methods for corresponding lx/ly ratio. The calculations have
been done for loads on beams and columns and designed frame analysis by moment
distribution method. Here we have a very low bearing capacity, hard soil and isolated
footing done.
CHAPTER: 7 REFERNESS
• Neelam Sharma (2016): Reinforced cement concrete design, reprint of first edition
January 2016, S.K.Kataria & sons p. ltd., Prakash mahal, Dr. subhash bhargav lane,
daryaganj, New Delhi.
• B.N. Dutta, Estimating and costing in civil engg., twenty-seventh revised edition.,
UBSPD publisher pvt.ltd., daryaganj, New Delhi.
• Dr. B.c. Punamia., Ashok kumar jain, Dr. Arun K. jain, Reinforced concrete
structures., Tenth edition., laxmi publication pvt. Ltd., golden house., daryaganj,
New Delhi
• IS:875 (part 3)-1987., A commentary on Indian standard code of practice for design
load(other than earthquake) for building and structure.
• IS 456:2000., Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice(fourth revision)
• IS 800:2007., General construction in steel – code of practice (third revision)