Procedures For Port State Control
Procedures For Port State Control
LIST OF ANNEXES
***
ANNEX 4
THE ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING ALSO resolution A.1119 (30), by which it adopted the Procedures for port State
control, 2017 (hereafter referred to as the "Procedures"), following successive revocations of
resolutions A.1052(27), A.882(21), A.787(19), A.742(18), A.597(15) and A.466(XII),
RECOGNIZING that efforts by port States have greatly contributed to enhanced maritime
safety and security, and prevention of marine pollution,
RECOGNIZING ALSO the need to update the Procedures to take account of the amendments
to IMO instruments which have entered into force or have become effective since the adoption
of resolution A.11119(30),
1 ADOPTS the Procedures for port State control, 2019, as set out in the annex to the
present resolution;
3 REQUESTS the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment Protection
Committee to keep the Procedures under review and to amend them as necessary;
ANNEX
Contents
CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Application
1.3 Introduction
1.4 Provision for port State control
1.5 Ships of non-Parties
1.6 Ships below convention size
1.7 Definitions
1.8 Professional profile of port State control officers (PSCOs)
1.9 Qualification and training requirements of PSCOs
2.1 General
2.2 Initial inspections
2.3 General procedural guidelines for PSCOs
2.4 Clear grounds
2.5 More detailed inspections
Appendices
Appendix 1 Code of Good Practice for port State control officers conducting inspections
within the framework of the regional Memoranda of Understanding and
Agreement on Port State Control
Appendix 3 Guidelines for investigations and inspections carried out under MARPOL
Annex I
Appendix 4 Guidelines for investigations and inspections carried out under MARPOL
Annex II
Appendix 6 Guidelines for more detailed inspections of ship structural and equipment
requirements
Appendix 8 Guidelines for port State control officers on the ISM Code
Appendix 13 Report of inspection in accordance with IMO port State control procedures
Appendix 18 Resolution MEPC.321(74) on 2019 Guidelines for port State control under
MARPOL Annex VI Chapter 3
CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL
1.1 PURPOSE
This document is intended to provide basic guidance on the conduct of port State control
inspections in support of the control provisions of relevant conventions and parts of the IMO
Instruments Implementation Code (III Code) (resolution A.1070(28)) and afford consistency in
the conduct of these inspections, the recognition of deficiencies of a ship, its equipment, or its
crew, and the application of control procedures.
1.2 APPLICATION
1.2.1 These Procedures apply to ships falling under the provisions of:
.1 the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended
(SOLAS 1974);
.2 the Protocol of 1988 relating to the International Convention for the Safety of
Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (SOLAS PROT 1988);
.5 the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973,
as modified by the 1978 and 1997 Protocols, as amended (MARPOL);
.10 the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969
(CLC 1969);
.11 the Protocol of 1992 to amend the International Convention on Civil Liability
for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, as amended (CLC PROT 1992);
.12 the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution
Damage, 2001 (BUNKERS 2001);
.13 the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships'
Ballast Water and Sediments, 2004, as amended (BWM 2004); and
1.2.2 Ships of non-Parties should be given no more favourable treatment (see section 1.5).
1.2.3 For ships below convention size, Parties should apply the procedures in section 1.6.
1.2.4 When exercising port State control, Parties should only apply those provisions of the
conventions which are in force and which they have accepted.
1.2.5 Where the provisions of the relevant conventions are not specific, the port State
control officer (PSCO) should in principle accept the design arrangement approved by flag
State and when appropriate consult with the flag Administration.
1.2.6 PSCO should be aware that the provisions of relevant conventions permit
Administrations to grant exemptions, allow equivalents* and approve Alternative Design and
Arrangements (ADA). When an Exemption Certificate is issued in accordance with the relevant
provisions of a convention, provided it includes the correct reference to the exemption
provision and the requirement to which it relates, or the ship carries the approved ADA
documentation (e.g. SOLAS 1974 regulation II-1/55.4.2), port State authorities should interpret
this as meaning that the ship complies with the provisions of the Convention. Port State
authorities should check, whenever possible, with the Administration should there be any doubt
whether an exemption, equivalence or ADA has been granted.
1.3 INTRODUCTION
1.3.1 Under the provisions of the relevant conventions set out in section 1.2 above, the
Administration (i.e. the Government of the flag State) is responsible for promulgating laws and
regulations and for taking all other steps which may be necessary to give the relevant
conventions full and complete effect so as to ensure that, from the point of view of safety of life
and pollution prevention, a ship is fit for the service for which it is intended and seafarers are
qualified and fit for their duties.
* Any Administration which allows, in substitution, a fitting, material, appliance or apparatus, or type thereof,
or provision, shall communicate to the Organization particulars thereof together with a report on any trials
made and the Organization shall circulate such particulars to other Contracting Governments for the
information of their officers.(e.g. SOLAS 1974 regulation I/5).
1.3.2 The nature of international shipping means that ships may not frequently call at ports
in their flag State. It is therefore common to find that such flag States appoint the nominated
surveyors at foreign ports and authorize recognized organizations in accordance with the
provisions of various conventions.
SOLAS 1974 regulations I/19, IX/6.2, XI-1/4 and XI-2/9 , as modified by SOLAS PROT 1988;
article 21 of LL 1966, as modified by LL PROT 1988; articles 5 and 6, regulation 11 of Annex I,
regulation 16.9 of Annex II, regulation 9 of Annex III, regulation 14 of Annex IV, regulation 9 of
Annex V and regulation 10 of Annex VI of MARPOL; article X of STCW 1978; article 12 of
TONNAGE 1969, article 11 of AFS 2001 and article 9 of BWM 2004 provide for control
procedures to be followed by a Party to a relevant convention with regard to foreign ships
visiting their ports. The authorities of port States should make effective use of these provisions
for the purposes of identifying deficiencies, if any, in such ships which may render them
substandard (see section 3.1) and ensuring that remedial measures are taken.
1.5.1 Article I(3) of SOLAS PROT 1988, article I(3) of LL PROT 1988, article 5(4) of
MARPOL, article X(5) of STCW 1978, article 3(3) of AFS 2001 and article 3(3) of BWM 2004
provide that no more favourable treatment is to be given to the ships of countries which are
not Party to the relevant convention. All Parties should, as a matter of principle, apply these
Procedures to ships of non-Parties in order to ensure that equivalent surveys and inspections
are conducted and an equivalent level of safety and protection of the marine environment is
ensured.
1.5.2 As ships of non-Parties are not provided with SOLAS, Load Lines, MARPOL, AFS or
BWM certificates, as applicable, or the crew members may not hold STCW certificates, the
Port State Control Officer (PSCO), taking into account the principles established in these
Procedures, should be satisfied that the ship and crew do not present a danger to those on
board or an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment. If the ship or crew has
some form of certification other than that required by a convention, the PSCO may take the
form and content of this documentation into account in the evaluation of that ship.
The conditions of and on such a ship and its equipment and the certification of the crew and
the flag State's minimum manning standard should be compatible with the aims of the
provisions of the conventions; otherwise, the ship should be subject to such restrictions as are
necessary to obtain a comparable level of safety and protection of the marine environment.
1.6.1 In the exercise of their functions, the PSCOs should be guided by any certificates and
other documents issued by or on behalf of the flag State Administration. In such cases, the
PSCOs should limit the scope of inspection to the verification of compliance with those
certificates and documents.
1.6.2 To the extent a relevant instrument is not applicable to a ship below convention size,
the PSCO's task should be to assess whether the ship is of an acceptable standard in regard
to safety and the environment. In making that assessment, the PSCO should take due account
of such factors as the length and nature of the intended voyage or service, the size and type
of the ship, the equipment provided and the nature of the cargo.
1.7 DEFINITIONS
1.7.1 Bulk carrier: While noting the definitions in SOLAS 1974 regulations IX/1.6 and
XII/1.1 and resolution MSC.277(85), for the purposes of port State control, PSCOs should be
guided by the ship's type indicated in the ship's certificates in determining whether a ship is a
bulk carrier and recognize that a ship which is not designated as a bulk carrier as the ship type
on the ship certificate may carry certain bulk cargo as provided for in the above instruments.
1.7.2 Clear grounds: Evidence that the ship, its equipment, or its crew does not correspond
substantially with the requirements of the relevant conventions or that the master or crew
members are not familiar with essential shipboard procedures relating to the safety of ships or
the prevention of pollution. Examples of clear grounds are included in section 2.4.
1.7.3 Deficiency: A condition found not to be in compliance with the requirements of the
relevant convention.
1.7.4 Detention: Intervention action taken by the port State when the condition of the ship
or its crew does not correspond substantially with the relevant conventions to ensure that the
ship will not sail until it can proceed to sea without presenting a danger to the ship or persons
on board, or without presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment,
whether or not such action will affect the normal schedule of the departure of the ship.
1.7.5 Initial inspection: A visit on board a ship to check the validity of the relevant
certificates and other documents, the overall condition of the ship, its equipment and its crew
(see also section 2.2).
1.7.6 More detailed inspection: An inspection conducted when there are "clear grounds",
as defined under paragraph 1.7.2.
1.7.7 Nearest appropriate and available repair yard: A port where follow up action can
be taken, and it is in/or closest to the port of detention or the port where the ship is authorized
to proceed taking into account the cargo on board.
1.7.8 Port State Control Officer (PSCO): A person duly authorized by the competent
authority of a Party to a relevant convention to carry out port State control inspections, and
responsible exclusively to that Party.
1.7.9 Recognized organization (RO): An organization which meets the relevant conditions
set forth in the Code for Recognized Organizations (RO Code) (MSC.349(92) and
MEPC.237(65)), and has been assessed and authorized by the flag State Administration in
accordance with provisions of the RO Code to provide the necessary statutory services and
certification to ships entitled to fly its flag.
1.7.11 Substandard ship: A ship whose hull, machinery, equipment or operational safety is
substantially below the standards required by the relevant convention or whose crew is not in
conformance with the safe manning document.
1.7.12 Valid certificates: A certificate that has been issued, electronically or on paper,
directly by a Party to a relevant convention or on its behalf by a recognized organization and
contains accurate and effective dates meets the provisions of the relevant convention and to
which the particulars of the ship, its crew and its equipment correspond.
1.8.1 Port State control should be carried out only by qualified PSCOs who fulfil the
qualifications and training specified in section 1.9.
1.8.2 When the required professional expertise cannot be provided by the PSCO, the PSCO
may be assisted by any person with the required expertise, as acceptable to the port State.
1.8.3 The PSCOs and persons assisting them should be free from any commercial,
financial, and other pressures and have no commercial interest in the port of inspection, the
ships inspected, ship repair facilities or any support services in the port or elsewhere, nor
should the PSCOs be employed by or undertake work on behalf of recognized organizations
or classification societies.
1.8.4 A PSCO should carry a personal document in the form of an identity card issued by
the port State and indicating that the PSCO is authorized to carry out the control.
1.9.1 The PSCO should be an experienced officer qualified as flag State surveyor.
1.9.2 The PSCO should be able to communicate in English with the key crew.
1.9.3 Training should be provided for PSCOs to give the necessary knowledge of the
provisions of the relevant conventions which are relevant to the conduct of port State control,
taking into account the latest IMO Model Courses for port State control.
1.9.4 In specifying the qualifications and training requirements for PSCOs, the
Administration should take into account, as appropriate, which of the internationally agreed
instruments are relevant for the control by the port State and the variety of types of ships which
may enter its ports.
1.9.6 Periodic seminars for PSCOs should be held in order to update their knowledge with
respect to instruments related to port State control.
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 In accordance with the provisions of the relevant conventions, Parties may conduct
inspections by PSCOs of foreign ships in their ports.
.2 the request of, or on the basis of information regarding a ship provided by,
another Party; or
2.1.3 Whereas Parties may entrust surveys and inspections of ships entitled to fly their own
flag either to inspectors nominated for this purpose or to recognized organizations, they should
be aware that, under the relevant conventions, foreign ships are subject to port State control,
including boarding, inspection, remedial action and possible detention, only by officers duly
authorized by the port State. This authorization of PSCOs may be a general grant of authority
or may be specific on a case-by-case basis.
2.1.4 All possible efforts should be made to avoid a ship being unduly detained or delayed.
If a ship is unduly detained or delayed, it should be entitled to compensation for any loss or
damage suffered.
2.2.1 In the pursuance of control procedures under the relevant conventions, which, for
instance, may arise from information given to a port State regarding a ship, a PSCO may
proceed to the ship and, before boarding, gain, from its appearance in the water, an impression
of its standard of maintenance from such items as the condition of its paintwork, corrosion or
pitting or unrepaired damage.
2.2.2 At the earliest possible opportunity, the PSCO should ascertain the type of ship, year
of build and size of the ship for the purpose of determining which provisions of the conventions
are applicable.
2.2.3 On boarding and introduction to the master or the responsible ship's officer, the PSCO
should examine the ship's relevant certificates and documents required by the relevant
conventions, as listed in appendix 12, part A. PSCOs should note the following:
2.2.4 After the certificate and document check, the PSCO should check the overall condition
of the ship, including its equipment, navigational bridge, checked including forecastle, cargo
holds/areas, engine-room and pilot transfer arrangements and verify that any outstanding
deficiency from the previous PSC inspection has been rectified.
2.2.5 If the certificates required by the relevant conventions are valid and the PSCO's
general impression and visual observations on board confirm a good standard of maintenance,
the PSCO should generally confine the inspection to reported or observed deficiencies, if any.
2.2.6 In pursuance of control procedures under chapter IX of SOLAS 1974 in relation to the
International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention
(ISM Code), the PSCO should utilize the guidelines in appendix 8.
2.2.7 If, however, the PSCO from general impression or observations on board has clear
grounds for believing that the ship, its equipment or its crew do not substantially meet the
requirements, taking into account paragraph 1.2.6, the PSCO should proceed to a more
detailed inspection, taking into consideration sections 2.4 and 2.5. In forming such an
impression, the PSCO should utilize the guidelines in relevant appendices.
2.3.1 The PSCO should observe the Code of Good Practice for Port State Control Officers
(MSC-MEPC.4/Circ.2), as shown in appendix 1, use professional judgement in carrying out all
duties and consider consulting others as deemed appropriate.
2.3.2 When boarding a ship, the PSCO should present to the master or to the representative
of the owner, if requested to do so, the PSCO identity card. This card should be accepted as
documented evidence that the PSCO in question is duly authorized by the Administration to
carry out port State control inspections.
2.3.3 If the PSCO has clear grounds for carrying out a more detailed inspection, the master
should be immediately informed of these grounds and advised that, if so desired, the master
may contact the Administration or, as appropriate, the RO responsible for issuing the certificate
and invite their presence on board.
2.3.4 In the case that an inspection is initiated based on a report or complaint, especially if
it is from a crew member, the source of the information should not be disclosed.
2.3.5 When exercising control, all possible efforts should be made to avoid a ship being
unduly detained or delayed. It should be borne in mind that the main purpose of port State
control is to prevent a substandard ship proceeding to sea. The PSCO should exercise
professional judgement to determine whether to detain a ship until the deficiencies are
corrected or to allow it to sail with certain deficiencies, having regard to the particular
circumstances of the intended voyage.
2.3.6 It should be recognized that all equipment is subject to failure and spares or
replacement parts may not be readily available. In such cases, undue delay should not be
caused if, in the opinion of the PSCO, safe alternative arrangements have been made.
2.3.7 Where the grounds for detention are the result of accidental damage suffered to a
ship, no detention order should be issued, provided that:
.2 prior to entering a port, the master or company has submitted to the port
State Authority details of the circumstances of the accident and the damage
suffered and information about the required notification of the flag State
Administration;
.4 the port State Authority has ensured, having been notified of the completion
of the remedial action, that deficiencies which were clearly hazardous to
safety, health or environment have been rectified.
2.3.8 Since detention of a ship is a serious matter involving many issues, it may be in the
best interest of the PSCO to act together with other interested parties (see paragraph 4.1.3).
For example, the officer may request the owner's representatives to provide proposals for
correcting the situation. The PSCO should also consider cooperating with the flag State
Administration's representatives or the RO responsible for issuing the relevant certificates, and
consulting them regarding their acceptance of the owner's proposals and their possible
additional requirements. Without limiting the PSCO's discretion in any way, the involvement of
other parties could result in a safer ship, avoid subsequent arguments relating to the
circumstances of the detention and prove advantageous in the case of litigation involving
"undue delay".
2.3.9 Where deficiencies cannot be remedied at the port of inspection, the PSCO may allow
the ship to proceed to another port, subject to any appropriate conditions determined. In such
circumstances, the PSCO should ensure that the competent authority of the next port of call
and the flag State are notified.
2.3.10 Detention reports to the flag State should be in sufficient detail for an assessment to
be made of the severity of the deficiencies giving rise to the detention.
2.3.11 The company or its representative have a right of appeal against a detention taken by
the Authority of a port State. The appeal should not cause the detention to be suspended.
The PSCO should properly inform the master of the right of appeal.
2.3.12 To ensure consistent enforcement of port State control requirements, PSCOs should
carry an extract of section 2.3 (General procedural guidelines for PSCOs) for ready reference
when carrying out any port State control inspections.
2.3.13 PSCOs should also be familiar with the detailed guidelines given in the appendices to
these Procedures.
2.4.1 When a PSCO inspects a foreign ship which is required to hold a convention
certificate, and which is in a port or an offshore terminal under the jurisdiction of the port State,
any such inspection should be limited to verifying that there are on board valid certificates and
other relevant documentation and the PSCO forming an impression of the overall condition of
the ship, its equipment and its crew, unless there are "clear grounds" for believing that the
condition of the ship or its equipment does not correspond substantially with the particulars of
the certificates.
2.4.2 "Clear grounds" to conduct a more detailed inspection include but are not limited to:
.6 information or evidence that the master or crew is not familiar with essential
shipboard operations relating to the safety of ships or the prevention of
pollution, or that such operations have not been carried out;
.7 indications that key crew members may not be able to communicate with
each other or with other persons on board;
2.5.1 If the ship does not carry valid certificates, or if the PSCO, from general impressions
or observations on board, has clear grounds for believing that the condition of the ship or its
equipment does not correspond substantially with the particulars of the certificates or that the
master or crew is not familiar with essential shipboard procedures, a more detailed inspection
as described in this chapter should be carried out, utilizing relevant appendices.
2.5.2 Support during the more detailed inspection could be found in the documents
mentioned in appendix 12, part B, where applicable.
2.5.3 It is not envisaged that all of the equipment and procedures outlined in this chapter
would be checked during a single port State control inspection, unless the condition of the ship
or the familiarity of the master or crew with essential shipboard procedures necessitates such
a detailed inspection. In addition, these procedures are not intended to impose the seafarer
certification programme of the port State on a ship entitled to fly the flag of another Party to
STCW 1978 or to impose control procedures on foreign ships in excess of those imposed on
ships of the port State.
3.1.2 If these evident factors as a whole or individually pose a danger to the ship or persons
on board or present an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment if it were allowed
to proceed to sea, it should be regarded as a substandard ship. The PSCO should also take
into account the guidelines in appendix 2.
3.2.2 This information should be submitted in writing to permit proper documentation of the
case and of the alleged deficiencies. If the information is passed verbally, the filing of a written
report should be required, identifying, for the purposes of the port State's records, the individual
or body providing the information. The attending PSCO may collect this information and submit
it as part of the PSCO's report if the originator is unable to do so.
3.2.4 Each Party to the relevant convention should determine which authorities should
receive information on substandard ships and initiate action. Measures should be taken to
ensure that information submitted to the wrong department should be promptly passed on by
such department to the appropriate authority for action.
3.3.1 On receipt of information about an alleged substandard ship or alleged pollution risk,
the authorities should immediately investigate the matter and take the action required by the
circumstances in accordance with the preceding sections.
3.3.2 Authorities which receive information about a substandard ship that could give rise to
detention should forthwith notify any maritime, consular and/or diplomatic representatives of
the flag State in the area of the ship and request them to initiate or cooperate with
investigations. Likewise, the RO which has issued the relevant certificates on behalf of the flag
State should be notified. These provisions will not, however, relieve the authorities of the port
State, being a Party to a relevant convention, of the responsibility for taking appropriate action
in accordance with its powers under the relevant conventions.
3.3.3 If the port State receiving information is unable to take action because there is
insufficient time or no PSCOs can be made available before the ship sails, the information
should be passed to the authorities of the country of the next appropriate port of call, to the
flag State and also to the RO in that port, where appropriate.
If a PSCO determines that a ship can be regarded as substandard as specified in section 3.1
and appendix 2, the port State should immediately ensure that corrective action is taken to
safeguard the safety of the ship and passengers and/or crew and eliminate any threat of harm
to the marine environment before permitting the ship to sail.
3.6.2 Prior to suspending an inspection, the PSCO should have recorded detainable
deficiencies in the areas set out in appendix 2, as appropriate.
3.6.3 The suspension of the inspection may continue until the responsible parties have
taken the steps necessary to ensure that the ship complies with the requirements of the
relevant instruments.
3.6.4 In cases where the ship is detained and an inspection is suspended, the port State
authority should notify the responsible parties without delay. The notification should include
information about the detention, and state that the inspection is suspended until that authority
has been informed that the ship complies with all relevant requirements.
3.7.1 The PSCO should endeavour to secure the rectification of all deficiencies detected.
3.7.2 In the case of deficiencies which are clearly hazardous to safety or the environment,
the PSCO should, except as provided in paragraph 3.7.3, ensure that the hazard is removed
before the ship is allowed to proceed to sea. For this purpose, appropriate action should be
taken, which may include detention or a formal prohibition of a ship to continue an operation
due to established deficiencies which, individually or together, would render the continued
operation hazardous.
3.7.4 On the condition that all possible efforts have been made to rectify all other
deficiencies, except those referred to in paragraphs 3.7.2 and 3.7.3, the ship may be allowed
to proceed to a port where any such deficiencies can be rectified.
3.7.5 If a ship referred to in paragraph 3.7.3 proceeds to sea without complying with the
conditions agreed to by the authority of the port of inspection that port State authority should
immediately alert the next port, if known, the flag State and all other authorities it considers
appropriate.
3.7.6 If a ship referred to in paragraph 3.7.3 does not call at the nominated repair port, the
port State authority of the repair port should immediately alert the flag State and detaining port
State, which may take appropriate action, and notify any other authority it considers
appropriate.
4.1.1 Port State authorities should ensure that, at the conclusion of an inspection, the
master of the ship is provided with a document showing the results of the inspection, details of
any action taken by the PSCO, and a list of any corrective action to be initiated by the master
and/or company. Such reports should be made in accordance with the format in appendix 13.
4.1.2 Where, in the exercise of port State control, a Party denies a foreign ship entry to the
ports or offshore terminals under its jurisdiction, whether or not as a result of information about
a substandard ship, it should forthwith provide the master and flag State with reasons for the
denial of entry.
4.1.3 In the case of a detention, at least an initial notification should be made to the flag
State Administration as soon as practicable (see paragraphs 2.3.8 and 3.3.2). If such
notification is made verbally, it should be subsequently confirmed in writing. As a minimum,
the notification should include details of the ship's name, the IMO number, copies of Forms A
and B as set out in appendix 13, time of detention and copies of any detention order. Likewise,
the recognized organizations which have issued the relevant certificates on behalf of the flag
State should be notified, where appropriate. The parties above should also be notified in writing
of the release of detention. As a minimum, this information should include the ship's name, the
IMO number, the date and time of release and a copy of Form B as set out in appendix 13.
4.1.4 If the ship has been allowed to sail with known deficiencies, the authorities of the port
State should communicate all the facts to the authorities of the country of the next appropriate
port of call, to the flag State, and to the RO, where appropriate.
4.1.5 Parties to a relevant convention, when they have exercised control giving rise to
detention, should submit to the Organization reports in accordance with SOLAS 1974
regulation I/19, article 11 of MARPOL, or article X(3) of STCW 1978. Such deficiency reports
should be made in accordance with the form given in appendices 13 or 16, as appropriate, or
may be submitted electronically by the port State or a regional PSC regime.
4.1.6 Copies of such deficiency reports should, in addition to being forwarded to the
Organization, be sent by the port State without delay to the authorities of the flag State and,
where appropriate, to the RO which had issued the relevant certificate. Deficiencies found
which are not related to the relevant conventions, or which involve ships of non-Parties or
below convention size, should be submitted to flag States and/or to appropriate organizations
but not to IMO.
4.1.7 Relevant telephone numbers and addresses of flag States Headquarters to which
reports should be sent as outlined above, as well as addresses of flag State offices which
provide inspection services should be provided to the Organization*.
4.2.1 On receiving a report on detention, the flag State and, where appropriate, the RO
through the flag State Administration, should, as soon as possible, inform the Organization of
remedial action taken in respect of the detention, which may be submitted electronically by the
flag State to the Global Integrated Ship Information System (GISIS) or in a format shown in
appendix 17.
4.2.2 Relevant telephone numbers and addresses of port State control offices,
Headquarters and those who provide inspection services should be provided to the
Organization.
* Such addresses are available in MSC-MEPC.6/Circ.17 (National contact points for safety and pollution
prevention and response), which may be amended, the IMO Internet Home Page and the GISIS module on
contact points (http://gisis.imo.org/Public).
in respect of the alleged deficiencies or contravention. That Party and the Organization should,
upon completion of such action, be informed of the outcome and details, where appropriate,
be included in the mandatory annual report to the Organization.
5.1.1 In the interest of making information regarding deficiencies and remedial measures
generally available, a summary of such reports should be made by the Organization in a timely
manner in order that the information can be disseminated in accordance with the
Organization's procedures to all Parties to the relevant conventions. In the summary of
deficiency reports, an indication should be given of flag State action or whether a comment by
the flag State concerned is outstanding.
5.1.2 The appropriate Committee should periodically evaluate the summary of the
deficiency reports in order to identify measures that may be necessary to ensure more
consistent and effective application of IMO instruments, paying close attention to the difficulties
reported by Parties to the relevant conventions, particularly in respect of developing countries
in their capacity as port States.
APPENDIX 1
Introduction
Objective
2 The objective of this Code is to assist PSCOs in conducting their inspections to the
highest professional level. PSCOs are central to achieving the aims of the regional PSC regime.
They are the daily contact with the shipping world. They are expected to act within the law, within
the rules of their Government and in a fair, open, impartial and consistent manner.
3 The Code of good practice encompasses three fundamental principles against which
all actions of PSCOs are judged: integrity, professionalism and transparency. These are
defined as follows:
4 The list of the actions and behaviour expected of PSCOs in applying these principles
is set out in the annex to this appendix.
6 Nothing in the Code shall absolve the PSCOs from complying with the specific
requirements of the PSC instruments and applicable national laws.
ANNEX
Respect
2 remember that a ship is a home as well as a workplace for the ship's personnel and
not unduly disturb their rest or privacy;
3 comply with any ship housekeeping rules such as removing dirty shoes or work
clothes;
4 not be prejudiced by the race, gender, religion or nationality of the crew when making
decisions and treat all personnel on board with respect;
7 never become threatening, abrasive or dictatorial or use language that may cause
offence;
Conduct of inspections
9 comply with all health and safety requirements of the ship and their Administration,
e.g. wearing of personal protective clothing, and not take any action or cause any
action to be taken which could compromise the safety of the PSCO or the ship's crew;
10 comply with all security requirements of the ship and wait to be escorted around the
ship by a responsible person;
11 present their identity cards to the master or the representative of the owner at the start
of the inspection;
12 explain the reason for the inspections; however, where the inspection is triggered by
a report or complaint they must not reveal the identity of the person making the
complaint;
13 apply the procedures of PSC and the convention requirements in a consistent and
professional way and interpret them pragmatically when necessary;
14 not try to mislead the crew, for example by asking them to do things that are contrary
to the relevant conventions;
16 seek advice when they are unsure of a requirement or of their findings rather than
making an uninformed decision, for example by consulting colleagues, publications,
the flag Administration, the recognized organization;
17 where it is safe to do so accommodate the operational needs of the port and the ship;
18 explain clearly to the master the findings of the inspection and the corrective action
required and ensure that the report of inspection is clearly understood;
19 issue to the master a legible and comprehensible report of inspection before leaving
the ship;
Disagreements
20 deal with any disagreement over the conduct or findings of the inspection calmly and
patiently;
21 advise the master of the complaint's procedure in place if the disagreement cannot
be resolved within a reasonable time;
22 advise the master of the right of appeal and relevant procedures in the case of
detention;
Integrity
23 be independent and not have any commercial interest in their ports and the ships they
inspect or companies providing services in their ports. For example, the PSCOs
should not be employed from time to time by companies which operate ships in their
ports or the PSCOs should not have an interest in the repair companies in their ports;
24 be free to make decisions based on the findings of their inspections and not on any
commercial considerations of the port;
25 always follow the rules of their administrations regarding the acceptance of gifts and
favours, e.g. meals on board;
26 firmly refuse any attempts of bribery and report any blatant cases to the maritime
authority;
Updating knowledge
APPENDIX 2
1.2 The PSCO will exercise professional judgment in determining whether to detain the
ship until the deficiencies are rectified or to allow the ship to sail with certain deficiencies
without unreasonable danger to the safety, health, or the environment, having also considered
the particular circumstances of the intended voyage.
Before detaining a ship for the reasons of not operating at appropriate established minimum
safe manning and STCW certification, the following will have to be considered, giving due
regard to the points listed under areas under the STCW 1978:
.3 whether or not appropriate hours of rest for the crew have been recorded
and there is evidence that the minimum hours of rest have been repeatedly
not been kept;
.5 nature of cargo.
.1 timing: ships which are unsafe to proceed to sea will be detained upon the
first inspection irrespective of the time the ship will stay in port; and
3.2 The need for the PSCO to return to the ship classifies the seriousness of the
deficiencies.
3.3 When deciding whether the deficiencies found in a ship are sufficiently serious to merit
detention, the PSCO should assess whether:
.2 the ship has the crew required in the minimum safe manning document or
equivalent.
3.4 During inspection, the PSCO should further assess whether the ship and/or crew,
throughout its forthcoming voyage, is able to:
.1 navigate safely;
3.5 If the result of any of these assessments is negative, taking into account all
deficiencies found, the ship should be strongly considered for detention. A combination of
deficiencies of a less serious nature may also warrant the detention of the ship.
4 General
The lack of valid certificates as required by the relevant conventions may warrant the detention
of ships. However, ships flying the flag of States not a Party to a convention or not having
implemented another relevant instrument, are not entitled to carry the certificates provided for
by the convention or other relevant instrument. Therefore, absence of the required certificates
should not by itself constitute a reason to detain these ships; however, in applying the "no more
favourable treatment" clause, substantial compliance with the provisions and criteria specified
in these Procedures must be required before the ship sails.
5 Detainable deficiencies
To assist the PSCO in the use of these Guidelines, there follows a list of deficiencies, grouped
under relevant conventions and/or codes, which are considered to be of such a serious nature
that they may warrant the detention of the ship involved. This list is not considered exhaustive,
but is intended to give examples of relevant items. However, the detainable deficiencies in the
area of STCW 1978, listed below, are the only grounds for detention under this Convention.
9 Absence or failure of the proper operation of the radio equipment for distress and
safety communication.
10 Absence or failure of the proper operation of navigation equipment, taking the relevant
provisions of SOLAS 1974 regulation V/16.2 into account.
16 Absence or failure of a voyage data recorder (VDR), when its use is compulsory.
3 The absence of sufficient and reliable information, in an approved form, which by rapid
and simple means enables the master to arrange for the loading and ballasting of the
ship in such a way that a safe margin of stability is maintained at all stages and at
varying conditions of the voyage, and that the creation of any unacceptable stresses
in the ship's structure is avoided.
5 Overloading.
6 Absence of, or impossibility to read, draught marks and/or Load Line marks.
7 The means of freeing water from the deck not in satisfactory or operational condition.
2 Remaining capacity of slop and/or sludge tank insufficient for the intended voyage.
Areas under MARPOL Annex III and dangerous goods carriage requirements
3 Stowage and segregation provisions of the IMDG Code Chapter 7.1, 7.2, 7.4, 7.5
and 7.6 are not met.
4 Ship is carrying dangerous goods not in compliance with the Document of Compliance
for carriage of dangerous goods of the ship.
6 Ship's personnel assigned to specific duties related to the cargo are not familiar with
those duties, any dangers posed by the cargo and with the measures to be taken in
such a context.
1 Absence of valid IAPP Certificate and where relevant EIAPP Certificates and
Technical Files.
2 A marine diesel engine, with a power output of more than 130 kW, which is installed
on board a ship constructed on or after 1 January 2000, or a marine diesel engine
having undergone a major conversion on or after 1 January 2000, which does not
comply with the NOX Technical Code 2008, as amended.
3 The sulphur content of any fuel oil used on board ships exceeds the limit of 0.5% m/m
on and after 1 January 2020.
4 The sulphur content of any fuel used on board exceeds 0.1% m/m while operating
within a SOX emission control area as per the provisions of regulation 14.
6 An incinerator installed on board the ship on or after 1 January 2000 does not comply
with requirements contained in appendix IV to the Annex, or the standard
specifications for shipboard incinerators developed by the Organization
(resolution MEPC.244(66)).
7 Ship's personnel are not familiar with essential procedures regarding the operation of
air pollution prevention equipment.
5 Inability to provide for the first watch at the commencement of a voyage and for
subsequent relieving watches persons who are sufficiently rested and otherwise fit for
duty.
Areas which may not warrant a detention, but where, for example, cargo operations
have to be suspended
Failure of the proper operation (or maintenance) of inert gas systems, cargo related gear or
machinery should be considered sufficient grounds to stop cargo operation.
APPENDIX 3
PART 1
1.1 On boarding and introduction to the master or responsible ship's officer, the port State
control officer (PSCO) should examine the Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate (IOPP)
Certificate, including the attached Supplement - Record of Construction and Equipment for
(ships other than) oil tankers, and the Oil Record Book (ORB). The ORB may be presented in
an electronic format. A declaration from the Administration should be viewed in order to accept
this electronic record book. If a declaration cannot be provided, a hard copy record book will
need to be presented for examination.
1.2 The certificate carries the information on the type of ship and the dates of surveys and
inspections. As a preliminary check it should be confirmed that the dates of surveys and
inspections are still valid. Furthermore, it should be established if the ship carries an oil cargo
and whether the carriage of such oil cargo is in conformity with the certificate (see also
paragraph 1.11 of the Record of Construction and Equipment for Oil Tankers).
1.3 Through examining the Record of Construction and Equipment, the PSCO may
establish how the ship is equipped for the prevention of marine pollution.
1.4 If the certificate is valid and the general impression and visual observations on board
confirm a good standard of maintenance, the PSCO should generally confine the inspection to
reported deficiencies, if any.
1.5 If, however, the PSCO from general impressions or observations on board has clear
grounds for believing that the condition of the ship or its equipment does not correspond
substantially with the particulars of the certificate, a more detailed inspection should be
initiated.
1.6 The inspection of the engine-room should begin with forming a general impression of
the state of the engine-room, the presence of traces of oil in the engine-room bilges and the
ship's routine for disposing of oil-contaminated water from the engine-room spaces.
1.7 Next a closer examination of the ship's equipment as listed in the IOPP Certificate
may take place. This examination should also confirm that no unapproved modifications have
been made to the ship and its equipment.
1.8 Should any doubt arise as to the maintenance or the condition of the ship or its
equipment, then further examination and testing may be conducted as considered necessary.
In this respect reference is made to annex 3 to the Survey Guidelines under the Harmonized
System of Survey and Certification (HSSC), 2019 (resolution A.[…](31)), as may be amended.
1.9 The PSCO should bear in mind that a ship may be equipped over and above the
requirements of Annex I of MARPOL. If such equipment is malfunctioning the flag State should
be informed. This alone however should not cause a ship to be detained unless the
discrepancy presents an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment.
1.10 In cases of oil tankers, the inspection should include the cargo tank and pump-room
area of the ship and should begin with forming a general impression of the layout of the tanks,
the cargoes carried, and the routine of cargo slops disposal.
2 Ships of non-Parties to MARPOL Annex I and other ships not required to carry
an IOPP Certificate
2.1 As this category of ships is not provided with an IOPP Certificate, the PSCO should
be satisfied with regard to the construction and equipment standards relevant to the ship on
the basis of the requirements set out in Annex I of MARPOL.
2.2 In all other respects the PSCO should be guided by the procedures for ships referred
to in section 1 above.
2.3 If the ship has some form of certification other than the IOPP Certificate, the PSCO
may take the form and content of this documentation into account in the evaluation of that ship.
3 Control
In exercising the control functions, the PSCO should use professional judgement to determine
whether to detain the ship until any noted deficiencies are corrected or to allow it to sail with
certain deficiencies which do not pose an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine
environment. In doing this, the PSCO should be guided by the principle that the requirements
contained in Annex I of MARPOL, in respect of construction and equipment and the operation
of ships, are essential for the protection of the marine environment and that departure from
these requirements could constitute an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine
environment.
PART 2
1 Experience has shown that information furnished to the flag State as envisaged in
appendix 5 of these Procedures is often inadequate to enable the flag State to cause
proceedings to be brought in respect of the alleged violation of the discharge requirements.
This appendix is intended to identify information which is often needed by a flag State for the
prosecution of such possible violations.
.1 the report aims to provide the optimal collation of obtainable data; however,
even if all the information cannot be provided, as much information as
possible should be submitted;
.3 reports of analyses of samples taken of the slick and on board; the reports
should include the results of the analyses, a description of the method
employed, reference to or copies of scientific documentation attesting to the
accuracy and validity of the method employed and names of persons
performing the analyses and their experience;
.4 a statement by the PSCO on board together with the PSCO's rank and
organization;
4 The report referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 should be sent to the flag State. If the
coastal State observing the pollution and the port State carrying out the investigation on board
are not the same, the State carrying out the latter investigation should also send a copy of its
findings to the State observing the pollution and requesting the investigation.
PART 3
.1 Name of ship
.4 Position of ship
.6 Type (e.g. tanker, cargo ship, passenger ship, fishing vessel), size
(estimated tonnage) and other descriptive data (e.g. superstructure colour
and funnel mark)
.10 Part of the ship from which side discharge was seen emanating
.11 Whether discharge ceased when ship was observed or contacted by radio
.2 Position of oil slick in longitude and latitude if different from paragraph 1.1.4
.8 Sea state
.5 Name or identity of ship or aircraft from which the observation was made
.1 Visual
.2 Conventional photographs
Experience has shown that the aforementioned can be obtained with the
following three photographs:
- details of the slick taken almost vertically down from an altitude of less
than 300 m with the sun behind the photographer;
- an overall view of the ship and "slick" showing oil emanating from a
particular ship; and
.2 Explanation of master
2 Investigation on board
.1 Name of ship
.3 Port of registry
.4 Type of ship
Note: If the ship is not issued an IOPP Certificate, as much as possible of the
requested information should be given.
Note: If the ship does not have an IOPP Certificate, a description should be given
of the equipment and arrangements on board, designed to prevent marine
pollution.
.2 Copy or printout sufficient pages of the ORB – part II (if on board) to cover a
full loading/unloading/ballasting and tank cleaning cycle of the ship. Also a
copy of the tank diagram.
.4 Spot check if positions mentioned in the log-book agree with positions noted
in the ORB
Other documentation relevant for evidence (if necessary make copies) such as:
If the ORB – part I has not been properly completed, information on the following questions
may be pertinent:
.3 If so, at what time was this system last put into operation and at what time
was this system last put on manual mode?
.4 If not, what were date and time of the last bilge discharge?
.5 What was the date of the last disposal of residue and how was disposal
effected?
If the ORB – part II has not been properly completed, information on the following questions
may be pertinent:
.8 What was the cargo/ballast distribution in the ship on departure from the last
port?
.9 What was the cargo/ballast distribution in the ship on arrival in the current
port?
.12 When and where was the last discharge of dirty ballast?
.13 When and where was the last cleaning of cargo tanks?
.14 When and where was the last COW operation and which tanks were
washed?
.15 When and where was the last decanting of slop tanks?
.16 What is the ullage in the slop tanks and the corresponding height of
interface?
.17 Which tanks contained the dirty ballast during the ballast voyage (if ship
arrived in ballast)?
.18 Which tanks contained the clean ballast during the ballast voyage (if ship
arrived in ballast)?
.19 Details of the present voyage of the ship (previous ports, next ports, trade)
.22 Availability or non-availability of reception facilities for oily wastes during the
present voyage
In the case of oil tankers the following additional information may be pertinent:
.24 The trade the ship is engaged in, such as short/long distance, crude or
product or alternating crude/product, lightering service, oil/dry bulk
Miscellaneous information:
3 Investigation ashore
Additional information on the ship, obtained from oil terminal staff, tank cleaning
contractors or shore reception facilities may be pertinent.
5 Conclusion
.3 Did the results of the investigation warrant the filing of a deficiency report?
PART 4
1 Preamble
1.1 Guidelines for the in-port inspection of crude oil washing (COW) procedures, as called for
by resolution 7 of the International Conference on Tanker Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1978,
are required to provide a uniform and effective control of crude oil washing to ensure compliance
of ships at all times with the provisions of MARPOL.
1.2 The design of the crude oil washing installation is subject to the approval of the flag
Administration. However, although the operational aspect of crude oil washing is also subject to
the approval of the same Administration, it might be necessary for a port State Authority to see
to it that continuing compliance with agreed procedures and parameters is ensured.
1.3 The COW Operations and Equipment Manual has been so specified that it contains all
the necessary information relating to the operation of crude oil washing on a particular tanker.
The objectives of the inspection would then be to ensure that the provisions of the Manual
dealing with safety procedures and with pollution prevention are being strictly adhered to.
1.4 The method of the inspection is at the discretion of the port State Authority and may
cover the entire operation or only those parts of the operation which occur when the PSCO is
on board.
2 Inspections
2.1 A port State should make the appropriate arrangements so as to ensure compliance
with requirements governing the crude oil washing of oil tankers. This is not, however, to be
construed as relieving terminal operators and ship owners of their obligations to ensure that
the operation is undertaken in accordance with the regulations.
2.2 The inspection may cover the entire operation of crude oil washing or only certain
aspects of it. It is thus in the interest of all concerned that the ship's records with regard to the
COW operations are maintained at all times so that a PSCO may verify those operations
undertaken prior to the inspection.
3 Ship's personnel
3.1 The person in charge and the other nominated persons who have responsibility in
respect of the crude oil washing operation should be identified. They must, if required, be able
to show that their qualifications meet the requirements, as appropriate, of paragraphs 5.2
and 5.3 of the Revised specifications for the design, operation and control of crude oil washing
systems (resolution A.446(XI)), as amended.
4 Documentation
.1 whether the ship is fitted with a crude oil washing system as required
in regulation 33 of MARPOL Annex I;
.3 the validity and date of the Operations and Equipment Manual; and
.4 the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate to confirm that the inert gas
system conforms to regulations contained in chapter II-2 of SOLAS 1974.
5.1 Inert gas system regulations require that instrumentation shall be fitted for
continuously indicating and permanently recording at all times when inert gas is being supplied,
the pressure and the oxygen content of the gas in the inert gas supply main. Reference to the
permanent recorder would indicate if the system had been operating before and during the
cargo discharge in a satisfactory manner.
5.2 If conditions specified in the Manual are not being met then the washing must be
stopped until satisfactory conditions are restored.
5.3 As a further precautionary measure, the oxygen level in each tank to be washed is to
be determined at the tank. The meters used should be calibrated and inspected to ensure that
they are in good working order. Readings from tanks already washed in port prior to inspection
should be available for checking. Spot checks on readings may be instituted.
6 Electrostatic generation
It should be confirmed either from the cargo log or by questioning the person in charge that
presence of water in the crude oil is being minimized as required by paragraph 6.7 of the
revised Specifications for the design, operation and control of crude oil washing systems
(resolution A.446(XI)), as amended.
7 Communication
It should be established that effective means of communication exist between the person in
charge and the other persons concerned with the COW operation.
8 Leakage on deck
PSCOs should ensure that the COW piping system has been operationally tested for leakage
before cargo discharge and that the test has been noted in the ship's ORB.
It should be ascertained that the method of excluding cargo oil from the machinery space is
being maintained by inspecting the isolating arrangements of the tank washing heater (if fitted)
or of any part of the tank washing system which enters the machinery space.
In judging the suitability of the oil for crude oil washing, the guidance and criteria contained in
section 9 of the COW Operations and Equipment Manual should be taken into account.
11 Checklist
It should be determined from the ship's records that the pre-crude oil wash operational
checklist was carried out and all instruments functioned correctly. Spot checks on certain items
may be instituted.
12 Wash programmes
12.1 Where the tanker is engaged in a multiple port discharge, the ORB would indicate if
tanks were crude oil washed at previous discharge ports or at sea. It should be determined that
all tanks which will, or may be, used to contain ballast on the forthcoming voyage will be crude
oil washed before the ship departs from the port. There is no obligation to wash any tank other
than ballast tanks at a discharge port except that each of these other tanks must be washed
at least in accordance with paragraph 6.1 of the revised Specifications for the design, operation
and control of crude oil washing systems (resolution A.446(XI)), as amended. The ORB should
be inspected to check that this is being complied with.
12.2 All crude oil washing must be completed before a ship leaves its final port of
discharge.
12.3 If tanks are not being washed in one of the preferred orders given in the Manual, the
PSCO should determine that the reason for this and the proposed order of tank washing are
acceptable.
12.4 For each tank being washed it should be ensured that the operation is in accordance
with the Manual in that:
.1 the deck mounted machines and the submerged machines are operating
either by reference to indicators, the sound patterns or other approved
methods;
.4 the number of tank washing machines being used simultaneously does not
exceed that specified.
13 Stripping of tanks
13.1 The minimum trim conditions and the parameters of the stripping operations are to be
stated in the Manual.
13.2 All tanks which have been crude oil washed are to be stripped. The adequacy of the
stripping is to be checked by hand dipping at least in the aftermost hand dipping location in
each tank or by such other means provided and described in the Manual. It should be
ascertained that the adequacy of stripping has been checked or will be checked before the
ship leaves its final port of discharge.
14 Ballasting
14.1 Tanks that were crude oil washed at sea will be recorded in the Oil Record Book.
These tanks must be left empty between discharge ports for inspection at the next discharge
port. Where these tanks are the designated departure ballast tanks they may be required to
be ballasted at a very early stage of the discharge. This is for operational reasons and also
because they must be ballasted during cargo discharge, if hydrocarbon emission is to be
contained on the ship. If these tanks are to be inspected when empty, then this must be done
shortly after the tanker berths. If a PSCO arrives after the tanks have begun accepting ballast,
then the sounding of the tank bottom would not be available. However, an examination of the
surface of the ballast water is then possible. The thickness of the oil film should not be greater
than that specified in paragraph 4.2.10(b) of the revised Specifications for the design,
operation and control of crude oil washing systems (resolution A.446(XI)), as amended.
14.2 The tanks that are designated ballast tanks will be listed in the Manual. It is, however,
left to the discretion of the master or responsible officer to decide which tanks may be used for
ballast on the forthcoming voyage. It should be determined from the ORB that all such tanks
have been washed before the tanker leaves its last discharge port. It should be noted that
where a tanker back-loads a cargo of crude oil at an intermediate port into tanks designated
for ballast, then it should not be required to wash those tanks at that particular port but at a
subsequent port.
14.3 It should be determined from the ORB that additional ballast water has not been put
into tanks which had not been crude oil washed during previous voyages.
14.4 It should be verified that the departure ballast tanks are stripped as completely as
possible. Where departure ballast is filled through cargo lines and pumps these must be
stripped either into another cargo tank or ashore by the special small diameter line provided
for this purpose.
14.5 The methods to avoid vapour emission where locally required will be provided in the
Manual and they must be adhered to. The PSCO should ensure that this is being complied with.
14.6 The typical procedures for ballasting listed in the Manual must be observed.
The PSCO should ensure this is being complied with.
14.7 When departure ballast is to be shifted, the discharge into the sea must be in
compliance with regulations 15 and 34 of Annex I of MARPOL. The ORB should be inspected
to ensure that the ship is complying with this.
APPENDIX 4
PART 1
1.1 On boarding and after introducing oneself to the master or responsible ship's officer,
the port State control officer (PSCO) should examine the Certificate of Fitness (COF) or NLS
Certificate and Cargo Record Book (CRB). The CRB may be presented in an electronic format.
A declaration from the Administration should be viewed in order to accept this electronic record
book. If a declaration cannot be provided, a hard copy record book will need to be presented for
examination.
1.2 The Certificate includes information on the type of ship, the dates of surveys and a
list of the products which the ship is certified to carry.
1.3 As a preliminary check, the Certificate's validity should be confirmed by verifying that
the Certificate is properly completed and signed and that required surveys have been
performed. In reviewing the Certificate particular attention should be given to verifying that only
those noxious liquid substances which are listed on the Certificate are carried and that these
substances are in tanks approved for their carriage.
1.4 The CRB should be inspected to ensure that the records are up to date. The PSCO
should check whether the ship left the previous port(s) with residues of noxious liquid
substances on board which could not be discharged into the sea. The book could also have
relevant entries from the appropriate authorities in the previous ports. If the examination
reveals that the ship was permitted to sail from its last unloading port under certain conditions,
the PSCO should ascertain that such conditions have been or will be adhered to. If the PSCO
discovers an operational violation in this respect, the flag State should be informed by means
of a deficiency report.
1.5 If the Certificate is valid and the PSCO's general impressions and visual observations
on board confirm a good standard of maintenance, the PSCO should, provided that the CRB
entries do not show any operational violations, confine the inspection to reported deficiencies,
if any.
1.6 If, however, the PSCO's general impressions or observations on board show clear
grounds for believing that the condition of the ship, its equipment, or its cargo and slops
handling operations do not correspond substantially with the particulars of the Certificate, the
PSCO should proceed to a more detailed inspection:
.2 the more detailed inspection should include the cargo and pump-room areas
of the ship and should begin with forming a general impression of the layout
of the tanks, the cargoes carried, pumping and stripping conditions and
cargo;
.4 should any doubt arise as to the maintenance or the condition of the ship or
its equipment then further examination and testing may be conducted as may
be necessary. In this respect reference is made to the Survey Guidelines
under the Harmonized System of Survey and Certification, 2017
(resolution A.[…](31)), as may be amended.
1.7 The PSCO should bear in mind that a ship may be equipped over and above the
requirements of Annex II of MARPOL. If such equipment is malfunctioning the flag State should
be informed. This alone, however, should not cause a ship to be detained unless the
malfunction presents an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment.
2.1 As this category of ship is not provided with a COF or NLS Certificate as required by
Annex II of MARPOL, the PSCO should be satisfied with regard to the construction and
equipment standards relevant to the ship on the basis of the requirements set out in Annex II
of MARPOL and the Standards for Procedures and Arrangements.
2.2 In all other respects the PSCO should be guided by the procedures for ships referred
to in section 1 above (i.e. ships required to hold a Certificate).
2.3 If the ship has some form of certification other than the required Certificate, the PSCO
may take the form and content of this document into account in the evaluation of that ship.
Such a form of certification, however, is only of value to the PSCO if the ship has been provided
with a P and A Manual.
3 Control
In exercising the control functions, the PSCO should use professional judgement to determine
whether to detain the ship until any noted deficiencies are rectified or to allow it to sail with
certain deficiencies which do not pose an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine
environment. In doing this, the PSCO should be guided by the principle that the requirements
contained in Annex II of MARPOL, in respect of construction and equipment and the operation
of ships, are essential for the protection of the marine environment and that departure from
these requirements could constitute an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine
environment.
PART 2
1 With illegal discharges, past experience has shown that information furnished to the
flag State is often inadequate to enable the flag State to cause proceedings to be brought in
respect of the alleged violation of the discharge requirements. This appendix is intended to
identify information which will be needed by a flag State for the prosecution of violations of the
discharge provisions under Annex II of MARPOL.
.1 the report aims to provide the optimal collation of obtainable data; however,
even if all the information cannot be provided, as much information as
possible should be submitted;
.3 the discharge may have been oil, in which case part 2 to appendix 3 of this
resolution applies (Guidelines for Investigation and Inspections carried out
under Annex I of MARPOL).
.3 reports of analyses of samples taken of the slick and on board; the reports
should include the results of the analyses, a description of the method
employed, reference to or copies of scientific documentation attesting to the
accuracy and validity of the method employed and names of persons
performing the analyses and their experience;
.4 a statement by the PSCO on board together with the PSCO's rank and
organization;
.6 statements by witnesses;
5 The report referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 should be sent to the flag State. If the
coastal State observing the pollution and the port State carrying out the investigation on board
are not the same, the State carrying out the latter investigation should also send a copy of its
findings to the State observing the pollution and requesting the investigation.
PART 3
.4 Position of ship
.10 Part of the ship from which discharge was seen emanating
.11 Whether discharge ceased when ship was observed or contacted by radio
.7 Colour of slick
.8 Sky conditions (bright sunshine, overcast, etc.), lightfall and visibility (km) at
the time of observation
.9 Sea state
.5 Name or identity of ship or aircraft from which the observation was made
.1 Visual
.2 Conventional photographs
- details of the slick taken almost vertically down from an altitude of less
than 300 metres with the sun behind the photographer;
.2 Explanation of master
2 Investigation on board
.3 Port of registry
.4 Type of ship
Other documentation relevant for evidence (if necessary make copies) such as:
2.7 Statements of persons concerned if the CRB has not been properly completed,
information on the following questions may be pertinent
.3 Which tanks needed cleaning at sea? Had the tanks been prewashed?
.7 Was the slop tank, or cargo tank used as a slop tank, discharged at sea?
.9 What are the contents of the slop tank or cargo tank used as slop tank?
.10 Which tanks contained the dirty ballast during the ballast voyage (if ship
arrived in ballast)?
.11 Which tanks contained the clean ballast during the ballast voyage (if ship
arrived in ballast)?
.12 Details of the present voyage of the ship (previous ports, next ports, trade)
Miscellaneous information
3 Investigation ashore
Additional information on the ship, obtained from terminal staff, tank cleaning
contractors or shore reception facilities may be pertinent.
5 Conclusion
.3 Did the results of the investigation warrant the filing of a deficiency report?
PART 4
1 Introduction
The PSCO or the surveyor authorized by the Administration exercising control in accordance
with regulation 16 of MARPOL Annex II should be thoroughly acquainted with Annex II of
MARPOL and the custom of the port as of relevance to cargo handling, tank washing, cleaning
berths, prohibition of lighters alongside, etc.
2 Documentation
The documentation required for the inspection referred to in this appendix consists of:
.4 CRB.
.3 the constraints, if any, under which the efficient stripping system operates
(i.e. back pressure, ambient air temperature, malfunctioning, etc.); and
.4 whether the ship requests an exemption from the prewashing and the
discharge of residues in the unloading port.
3.2 When tank washing is required without the use of water the PSCO or the surveyor
appointed or authorized by the Administration is to be informed about the tank washing
procedure and disposal of residues.
3.3 When the CRB is not up to date, any information on prewash and residue disposal
operations outstanding should be supplied.
Terminal staff should supply information on limitations imposed upon the ship in respect of
back pressure and/or reception facilities.
5 Control
5.1 On boarding and introduction to the master or responsible ship officers, the PSCO or
the surveyor appointed or authorized by the Administration should examine the necessary
documentation.
.6 tanks which may not be washed with water due to the nature of substances
involved (P and A Manual).
5.3 In respect of the prewash operations referred to under paragraph 5.2, the following
information is of relevance (P and A Manual):
.2 duration of one cycle of the tank washing machine and quantity of water
used;
.5 special procedures.
5.4 The PSCO or the surveyor authorized by the Administration, in accordance with
regulation 16 of MARPOL Annex II, should ascertain that unloading, stripping and/or prewash
operations are carried out in conformance with the information obtained in accordance with
paragraph 2 (Documentation) of this part. If this cannot be achieved, alternative measures
should be taken to ensure that the ship does not proceed to sea with more than the quantities
of residue specified in regulation 12 of MARPOL Annex II, as applicable. If the residue
quantities cannot be reduced by alternative measures the PSCO or the surveyor appointed or
authorized by the Administration should inform the port State Administration.
5.5 Care should be taken to ensure that cargo hoses and piping systems of the terminal
are not drained back to the ship.
.1 regulations 4.2 and 4.3: the ship is constructed before 1 July 1986 and is
exempted from the requirement for reducing its residue quantities to
specified limits of regulation 12 (i.e. category X or Y substances 300 litres
and category Z substances 900 litres); this is subject to the conditions of
regulation 4.3 that whenever a cargo tank is to be washed or ballasted, a
prewash is required with disposal of prewash slops to shore reception
facilities; the COF or NLS Certificate should have been endorsed to the effect
that the ship is solely engaged in restricted voyages;
.2 regulation 4.4: the ship is never required to ballast its cargo tanks and tank
washing is only required for repair or dry-docking; the COF or NLS Certificate
should indicate the particulars of the exemption; each cargo tank should be
certified for the carriage of only one named substance;
.3 regulation 13.4.1: cargo tanks will not be washed or ballasted prior to the
next loading;
.4 regulation 13.4.2: cargo tanks will be washed and prewash slops will be
discharged to reception facilities in another port; it should be confirmed in
writing that an adequate reception facility is available at that port for such
purpose; and
5.7 The PSCO or the surveyor appointed or authorized by the Administration must
endorse the CRB under section J whenever an exemption under regulation 13.4 referred to in
paragraph 5.6 above has been granted, or whenever a tank having unloaded category X
substances has been prewashed in accordance with the P and A Manual.
5.8 Alternatively, for category X substances, regulation 13.6.1.1 of MARPOL Annex II,
residual concentration should be measured by the procedures which each port State
authorizes. In this case the PSCO or the surveyor authorized by the Administration must
endorse in the CRB under section K whenever the required residual concentration has been
achieved.
5.9 In addition to paragraph 5.7 above, the PSCO or the surveyor authorized by the
Administration shall endorse the CRB whenever the unloading, stripping or prewash of
category Y and Z substances, in accordance with the P and A Manual, has actually been
witnessed.
APPENDIX 5
1 Introduction
1.1 Regulations 15 and 34 of MARPOL Annex I prohibit the discharge into the sea of oil
and regulation 13 of Annex II prohibits the discharge into the sea of noxious liquid substances
except under precisely defined conditions. A record of these operations shall be completed,
where appropriate, in the form of an Oil or Cargo Record Book as applicable and shall be kept
in such a place as to be readily available for inspection at all reasonable times.
1.2 The regulations referred to above provide that whenever visible traces of oil are
observed on or below the surface of the water in the immediate vicinity of a ship or of its wake,
a Party should, to the extent that it is reasonably able to do so, promptly investigate the facts
bearing on the issue of whether or not there has been a violation of the discharge provisions.
1.3 The conditions under which noxious liquid substances are permitted to be discharged
into the seas include quantity, quality and position limitations, which depend on category of
substance and sea area.
1.5 Recognizing the likelihood that many of the violations of the discharge provisions will
take place outside the immediate control and knowledge of the flag State, article 6 of MARPOL
provides that Parties shall cooperate in the detection of violations and the enforcement of the
provisions using all appropriate and practicable measures of detection and environmental
monitoring, adequate procedures for reporting and gathering evidence. MARPOL also contains
a number of more specific provisions designed to facilitate that cooperation.
1.6 Several sources of information about possible violations of the discharge provisions
can be indicated. These include:
1.7 Action which can be taken by States other than the flag or port States that have
information on discharge violations (hereinafter referred to as coastal States):
2.1 Parties shall appoint or authorize officers to carry out investigations for the purpose
of verifying whether a ship has discharged oil or noxious liquid substances in violation of the
provisions of MARPOL.
2.2 Parties may undertake such investigations on the basis of reports received from
sources indicated in paragraph 1.6 above.
2.3 These investigations should be directed toward the gathering of sufficient evidence to
establish whether the ship has violated the discharge requirements. Guidelines for the optimal
collation of evidence are given in appendices 3 and 4.
2.4 If the investigations provide evidence that a violation of the discharge requirements
took place within the jurisdiction of the port State, that port State shall either cause proceedings
to be taken in accordance with its law, or furnish to the flag State all information and evidence
in its possession about the alleged violation. When the port State causes proceedings to be
taken, it shall inform the flag State.
2.5 Details of the report to be submitted to the flag State are set out in appendix 16.
2.6 The investigation might provide evidence that pollution was caused through damage
to the ship or its equipment. This might indicate that a ship is not guilty of a violation of the
discharge requirements of Annex I or Annex II of MARPOL provided that:
.1 all reasonable precautions have been taken after the occurrence of the
damage or discovery of the discharge for the purpose of preventing or
minimizing the discharge; and
.2 the owner or the master did not act either with intent to cause damage or
recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.
2.7 However, action by the port State as set out in chapter 3 of these Procedures may be
called for.
3.1 Regulations 18, 33 and 35 of MARPOL Annex I, inter alia, require that crude oil
washing of cargo tanks be performed on certain categories of crude carriers. A sufficient
number of tanks shall be washed in order that ballast water is put only in cargo tanks which
have been crude oil washed. The remaining cargo tanks shall be washed on a rotational basis
for sludge control.
3.2 Port State Authorities may carry out inspections to ensure that crude oil washing is
performed by all crude carriers either required to have a COW system or where the owner or
operator chooses to install a COW system in order to comply with regulation 18 of MARPOL
Annex I. In addition, compliance should be ensured with the operational requirements set out
in the Revised specifications for the design, operation and control of crude oil washing systems
(resolution A.446(XI), as amended). This can best be done in the ports where the cargo is
unloaded.
3.3 Parties should be aware that the inspection referred to in paragraph 3.2 may also lead
to the identification of a pollution risk, necessitating additional action by the port State as set
out in chapter 3 of these Procedures.
3.4 Detailed guidelines for in-port inspections of crude oil washing procedures have been
approved and published by IMO (Crude Oil Washing Systems, revised edition, 2000) and are
set out in part 4 to appendix 3.
4.2 The provisions of regulation 16 are aimed at ensuring in principle that a ship having
unloaded, to the maximum possible extent, noxious liquid substances of category X, Y or Z,
proceeds to sea only if residues of such substances have been reduced to such quantities as
may be discharged into the sea.
4.3 Compliance with these provisions is in principle ensured in the case of categories X, Y
and Z substances through the application of a prewash in the unloading port and the discharge
of prewash residue water mixtures to reception facilities, except that in the case of non-solidifying
and low viscosity categories Y and Z substances, requirements for the efficient stripping of a tank
to negligible quantities apply in lieu of the application of a prewash. Alternatively for a number of
substances ventilation procedures may be employed for removing cargo residues from a tank.
4.4 Regulation 16.6 permits the Government of the receiving Party to exempt a ship
proceeding to a port or terminal under the jurisdiction of another Party from the requirement to
prewash cargo tanks and discharge residue/water mixtures to a reception facility.
4.6 A ship whose constructional and operational features are such that ballasting of cargo
tanks is not required and cargo tank washing is only required for repairs or dry-docking may by
virtue of regulation 4.4 be exempted from the provisions of regulation 12 of MARPOL Annex II
provided that all conditions mentioned in regulation 4.4 are complied with. Consequentially, the
certificate of the ship should indicate that each cargo tank is only certified for the carriage of one
named substance. It should also indicate the particulars of the exemption granted by the
Administration in respect of pumping, piping and discharge arrangements.
4.7 Detailed instructions on efficient stripping and prewash procedures are included in a
ship's Procedures and Arrangements Manual. The Manual also contains alternative
procedures to be followed in case of equipment failure.
4.8 Parties should be aware that the inspection referred to in paragraphs 1.3 and 1.4
above may lead to the identification of a pollution risk or of a contravention of the discharge
provisions, necessitating port State action as set out in chapter 3 of these Procedures.
4.9 For details in respect of inspections under this section reference is made to
appendix 4.
APPENDIX 6
1 Introduction
If the port State control officer (PSCO) from general impressions or observations on board has
clear grounds for believing that the ship might be substandard, the PSCO should proceed to a
more detailed inspection, taking the following considerations into account.
2 Structure
2.1 The PSCO's impression of hull maintenance and the general state on deck, the
condition of such items as ladderways, guard rails, pipe coverings and areas of corrosion or
pitting should influence the PSCO's decision as to whether it is necessary to make the fullest
possible examination of the structure with the ship afloat. Significant areas of damage or
corrosion, or pitting of plating and associated stiffening in decks and hull affecting
seaworthiness or strength to take local loads, may justify detention. It may be necessary for
the underwater portion of the ship to be checked. In reaching a decision, the PSCO should
have regard to the seaworthiness and not the age of the ship, making an allowance for fair
wear and tear over the minimum acceptable scantlings. Damage not affecting seaworthiness
will not constitute grounds for judging that a ship should be detained, nor will damage that has
been temporarily but effectively repaired for a voyage to a port for permanent repairs. However,
in this assessment of the effect of damage, the PSCO should have regard to the location of
crew accommodation and whether the damage substantially affects its habitability.
2.2 The PSCO should pay particular attention to the structural integrity and seaworthiness
of bulk carriers and oil tankers and note that these ships must undergo the enhanced
programme of inspection during surveys under the provision of SOLAS regulation XI-1/2.
2.3 The PSCO's assessment of the safety of the structure of those ships should be based
on the Survey Report File carried on board. This file should contain reports of structural
surveys, condition evaluation reports (translated into English and endorsed by or on behalf of
the Administration), thickness measurement reports and a survey planning document. The
PSCO should note that there may be a short delay in the update of the Survey Report File
following survey. Where there is doubt that the required survey has taken place, the PSCO
should seek confirmation from the recognized organization.
2.4 If the Survey Report File necessitates a more detailed inspection of the structure of
the ship or if no such report is carried, special attention should be given by the PSCO, as
appropriate, to hull structure, piping systems in way of cargo tanks or holds, pump-rooms,
cofferdams, pipe tunnels, void spaces within the cargo area, and ballast tanks.
2.5 For bulk carriers, PSCOs should inspect holds' main structure for any obviously
unauthorized repairs. For bulk carriers the PSCO should verify that the bulk carrier booklet has
been endorsed, the water level alarms in cargo holds are fitted, and where applicable, that any
restrictions imposed on the carriage of solid bulk cargoes have been recorded in the booklet
and the bulk carrier loading triangle is permanently marked.
3 Machinery spaces
3.1 The PSCO should assess the condition of the machinery and of the electrical
installations such that they are capable of providing sufficient continuous power for propulsion
and for auxiliary services.
3.2 During inspection of the machinery spaces, the PSCO should form an impression of
the standard of maintenance. Frayed, disconnected or inoperative quick-closing valve wires,
disconnected or inoperative extended control rods or machinery trip mechanisms, missing
valve hand wheels, evidence of chronic steam, water and oil leaks, dirty tank tops and bilges
or extensive corrosion of machinery foundations are pointers to an unsatisfactory organization
of the systems' maintenance. A large number of temporary repairs, including pipe clips or
cement boxes, will indicate reluctance to make permanent repairs.
3.3 While it is not possible to determine the condition of the machinery without
performance trials, general deficiencies, such as leaking pump glands, dirty water gauge
glasses, inoperable pressure gauges, rusted relief valves, inoperative or disconnected safety
or control devices, evidence of repeated operation of diesel engine scavenge belt or crankcase
relief valves, malfunctioning or inoperative automatic equipment and alarm systems, and
leaking boiler casings or uptakes, would warrant inspection of the engine-room log-book and
investigation into the record of machinery failures and accidents and a request for running tests
of machinery.
3.4 If one electrical generator is out of commission, the PSCO should investigate whether
power is available to maintain essential and emergency services and should conduct tests.
3.5 If evidence of neglect becomes evident, the PSCO should extend the scope of an
investigation to include, for example, tests on the main and auxiliary steering gear
arrangements, overspeed trips, circuit breakers, etc.
3.6 It must be stressed that while detection of one or more of the above deficiencies would
afford guidance to a substandard condition, the actual combination is a matter for professional
judgement in each case.
It may be that the PSCO has concluded that a hull inspection is unnecessary but, if dissatisfied
on the basis of observations on deck, with items such as defective hatch closing arrangements,
corroded air pipes and vent coamings, the PSCO should examine closely the conditions of
assignment of load lines, paying particular attention to closing appliances, means of freeing
water from the deck and arrangements concerned with the protection of the crew.
5 Life-saving appliances
5.2 Should such signs be evident, the PSCO would be justified in making a detailed
inspection of all life-saving appliances. Such an examination might include the lowering of
survival craft, a check on the servicing of liferafts, the number and condition of lifejackets and
lifebuoys and ensuring that the pyrotechnics are still within their period of validity. It would not
normally be as detailed as that for a renewal of the Safety Equipment Certificate and would
concentrate on essentials for safe abandonment of the ship, but in an extreme case could
progress to a full Safety Equipment Certificate inspection. The provision and functioning of
effective overside lighting, means of alerting the crew and passengers and provision of
illuminated routes to assembly points and embarkation positions should be given importance
in the inspection.
6 Fire safety
6.1 Ships in general: The poor condition of fire and wash deck lines and hydrants and the
possible absence of fire hoses and extinguishers in accommodation spaces might be a guide
to a need for a close inspection of all fire safety equipment. In addition to compliance with
convention requirements, the PSCO should look for evidence of a higher than normal fire risk;
this might be brought about by a poor standard of cleanliness in the machinery space, which
together with significant deficiencies of fixed or portable fire-extinguishing equipment could
lead to a judgement of the ship being substandard. Queries on the method of structural
protection should be addressed to the flag Administration and the PSCO should generally
confine the inspection to the effectiveness of the arrangements provided.
6.2 Passenger ships: The PSCO should initially form an opinion of the need for inspection
of the fire safety arrangements on the basis of consideration of the ship under the previous
headings and, in particular, that dealing with fire safety equipment. If the PSCO considers that
a more detailed inspection of fire safety arrangements is necessary, the PSCO should examine
the fire control plan on board in order to obtain a general picture of the fire safety measures
provided in the ship and consider their compliance with convention requirements for the year
of build. Queries on the method of structural protection should be addressed to the
flag Administration and the PSCO should generally confine the inspection to the effectiveness
of the arrangements provided.
6.3 The spread of fire could be accelerated if fire doors are not readily operable. The PSCO
should inspect for the operability and securing arrangements of those doors in the main zone
bulkheads and stairway enclosures and in boundaries of high fire risk spaces, such as main
machinery rooms and galleys, giving particular attention to those retained in the open position.
Attention should also be given to main vertical zones which may have been compromised
through new construction. An additional hazard in the event of fire is the spread of smoke
through ventilation systems. Spot checks might be made on dampers and smoke flaps to
ascertain the standard of operability. The PSCO should also ensure that ventilation fans can
be stopped from the master controls and that means are available for closing main inlets and
outlets of ventilation systems.
6.4 Attention should be given to the effectiveness of escape routes by ensuring that vital
doors are not maintained locked and that alleyways and stairways are not obstructed.
Regarding the minimum width of external escape routes, the arrangements approved by the
flag Administrations should be accepted.
6.5 The arrangements for the location of manually operated call points as approved by
the flag Administrations should be accepted.
A vital aspect of ensuring safety of life at sea is full compliance with the collision regulations.
Based on observations on deck, the PSCO should consider the need for close inspection of
lanterns and their screening and means of making sound and distress signals.
The general condition of the ship may lead the PSCO to consider matters other than those
concerned with safety equipment and assignment of load lines, but nevertheless associated
with the safety of the vessel, such as the effectiveness of items associated with the Cargo Ship
Safety Construction Certificate, which can include pumping arrangements, means for shutting
off air and oil supplies in the event of fire, alarm systems and emergency power supplies.
The validity of the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificates and associated Record of Equipment
(Form R) may be accepted as proof of the provision and effectiveness of its associated
equipment, but the PSCO should ensure that appropriate certificated personnel are carried for
its operation and for listening periods. Requirements for maintenance of radio equipment are
contained in SOLAS regulation IV/15. The radio log or radio records should be examined.
Where considered necessary, operational checks may be carried out.
10.1 Prior to boarding a ship, the PSCO should assess the means of embarkation on and
disembarkation from the ship. The PSCO should be guided by SOLAS regulation II-1/3-9 noting
its application to ships constructed on or after 1 January 2010 but also noting that paragraph 3
of this regulation applies to all ships and requires that:
.2 all wires used to support the means of embarkation and disembarkation shall
be maintained as specified in SOLAS regulation III/20.4.
10.2 In regard to the maintenance of the means of embarkation and disembarkation, the
PSCO should refer to the Guidelines for construction, installation, maintenance and
inspection/survey of means of embarkation and disembarkation (MSC.1/Circ.1331).
10.3 During the inspection, the PSCO should also ensure that the pilot transfer
arrangements comply with SOLAS regulation V/23 and the Unified interpretation of SOLAS
regulation V/23 (MSC.1/Circ.1375/Rev.1 and MSC.1/Circ.1495/Rev.1).
APPENDIX 7
1 Introduction
1.1 When, during a port State control inspection, the port State control officer (PSCO) has
clear grounds according to section 2.4 of the present Procedures, the following onboard
operational procedures may be checked in accordance with this resolution.
1.2 However, in exercising controls recommended in these guidelines, the PSCO should
not include any operational tests or impose physical demands which, in the judgement of the
master, could jeopardize the safety of the ship, crew, passengers, control officers or cargo.
Prior to requiring any practical operational control, the PSCO should review training and drill
records and should inspect, as appropriate, the associated safety equipment and its
maintenance records. For example, an enclosed space entry drill may be sufficiently verified
without an actual enclosed space entry by verifying drill records, maintenance records,
physical inspection and physical demonstrations by crew of breathing apparatus, safety
harnesses and atmosphere testing instruments.
1.3 When carrying out operational control, the PSCO should ensure, as far as possible,
no interference with normal shipboard operations, such as loading and unloading of cargo and
ballasting, which is carried out under the responsibility of the master, nor should the PSCO
require demonstration of operational aspects which would unnecessarily delay the ship.
1.4 Having assessed the extent to which operational requirements are complied with, the
PSCO then has to exercise professional judgement to determine whether the operational
proficiency of the crew as a whole is of a sufficient level to allow the ship to sail without danger
to the ship or persons on board, or presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine
environment.
1.5 When assessing the crew's ability to conduct an operational drill, the mandatory
minimum requirements for familiarization and basic safety training for seafarers, as stated
in STCW 1978, as amended, shall be used as a benchmark.
2 Muster list
2.1 The PSCO may determine if the crew members are aware of their duties indicated in
the muster list.
2.2 The PSCO may ensure that muster lists are exhibited in conspicuous places
throughout the ship, including the navigational bridge, the engine-room and the crew
accommodation spaces. When determining if the muster list is in accordance with the
regulations, the PSCO may verify whether:
.1 the muster list shows the duties assigned to the different members of the
crew;
.2 the muster list specifies which officers are assigned to ensure that life-saving
and fire appliances are maintained in good condition and are ready for
immediate use;
.3 the muster list specifies the substitutes for key persons who may become
disabled, taking into account that different emergencies may call for different
actions;
.4 the muster list shows the duties assigned to crew members in relation to
passengers in case of emergency; and
.5 the format of the muster list used on passenger ships is approved and is
drawn up in the language or languages required by the ship's flag State and
in the English language.
2.3 To determine whether the muster list is up to date, the PSCO may require an
up-to-date crew list, if available, to verify this.
2.4 The PSCO may determine whether the duties assigned to crew members manning
the survival craft (lifeboats or liferafts) are in accordance with the regulations and verify that a
deck officer or certificated person is placed in charge of each survival craft to be used.
However, the Administration (of the flag State), having due regard to the nature of the voyage,
the number of persons on board and the characteristics of the ship, may permit persons
practised in the handling and operation of liferafts to be placed in charge of liferafts in lieu of
persons qualified as above. A second-in-command shall also be nominated in the case of
lifeboats.
2.5 The PSCO may determine whether the crew members are familiar with the duties
assigned to them in the muster list and are aware of the locations where they should perform
their duties.
3 Communication
3.1 The PSCO may determine if the key crew members are able to communicate with
each other, and with passengers as appropriate, in such a way that the safe operation of the
ship is not impaired, especially in emergency situations.
3.2 The PSCO may ask the master which languages are used as the working languages
and may verify whether the language has been recorded in the log-book.
3.3 The PSCO may ensure that the key crew members are able to understand each other
during the inspection or drills. The crew members assigned to assist passengers should be
able to give the necessary information to the passengers in case of an emergency.
For passenger ships, the PSCO may verify that there is on board an approved plan for
cooperation with appropriate search and rescue services in event of an emergency.
5.1 The PSCO witnessing a fire and abandon ship drill should ensure that the crew
members are familiar with their duties and the proper use of the ship's installations and
equipment.
5.2 When setting a drill scenario, witnessing the drill and finally assessing the standard of
the drill, it is important to emphasize that the PSCO is not looking for an exceptional drill,
particularly on cargo ships. The main points for the PSCO to be satisfied are:
.4 In the event of the situation getting out of hand can the crew safely abandon
the ship?
5.3 It is important that when setting the scenario the PSCO clearly explains to the master
exactly what is required and expected during the drill, bearing in mind there may be language
difficulties. PSCOs should not be intimidating, not interfere during the drill nor offer advice.
The PSCO should stand back and observe only, making appropriate notes. It is important to
emphasize that the PSCO's role is not to teach or train but to witness.
5.4 Drills should be carried out at a safe speed. PSCOs should not expect to see
operational drills conducted in real time. During drills, care should be taken to ensure that
everybody familiarizes themselves with their duties and with the equipment. If necessary, drills
should be stopped if the PSCO considers that the crew are carrying out unsafe practices or if
there is a real emergency.
5.5 Language difficulty between the PSCO and non-English-speaking crews can make it
difficult to put across the intentions for the conduct of the exercise. Care needs to be exercised
when an unsatisfactory drill takes place: this is to ensure differentiation between the crew
possibly failing to understand the attending PSCO's intention and failure through lack of crew
competence.
6 Fire drills
6.1 The PSCO may witness a fire drill carried out by the crew assigned to these duties on
the muster list. After consultation with the master of the vessel, one or more specific locations
of the ship may be selected for a simulated fire. A crew member may be sent to the location(s)
and activate a fire alarm system or use other means to give alarm.
6.2 At the location the PSCO can describe the fire indication to the crew member and
observe how the report of fire is relayed to the bridge or damage control centre. At this point
most ships will sound the crew alarm to summon the fire-fighting parties to their stations.
The PSCO should observe the fire-fighting party arriving on the scene, breaking out their
equipment and fighting the simulated fire. Team leaders should be giving orders as appropriate
to their crews and passing the word back to the bridge or damage control centre on the
conditions. The fire-fighting crews should be observed for proper donning and use of their
equipment. The PSCO should make sure that all the gear is complete. Merely mustering the
crew with their gear is not acceptable. Crew response to personnel injuries can be checked by
selecting a crew member as a simulated casualty. The PSCO should observe how the word is
passed and the response of stretcher and medical teams. Handling a stretcher properly
through narrow passageways, doors and stairways is difficult and takes practice.
6.3 The drill should, as far as practicable, be conducted as if there were an actual
emergency.
6.4 Those crew members assigned to other duties related to a fire drill, such as the
manning of the emergency generators, the CO2 room, the sprinkler and emergency fire pumps,
should also be involved in the drill. The PSCO may ask these crew members to explain their
duties and, if possible, to demonstrate their familiarity.
6.5 On passenger ships, special attention should be paid to the duties of those crew
members assigned to the closing of manually operated doors and fire dampers. These closing
devices should be operated by the responsible persons in the areas of the simulated fire(s)
during the drill. Crew members not assigned to the fire-fighting teams are generally assigned
to locations throughout the passenger accommodations to assist in passenger evacuation.
These crew members should be asked to explain their duties and the meaning of the various
emergency signals and asked to point out the two means of escape from the area, and where
the passengers are to report. Crew members assigned to assist passengers should be able to
communicate at least enough information to direct a passenger to the proper muster and
embarkation stations.
7.1 After consultation with the master, the PSCO may require an abandon ship drill for
one or more survival craft. The essence of this drill is that the survival craft are manned and
operated by the crew members assigned to them on the muster list. If possible the PSCO
should include the rescue boat(s) in this drill. SOLAS chapter III gives specific requirements
on abandon ship training and drills, of which the following principles are particularly relevant.
7.2 The drill should, as far as practicable, be conducted as if there were an actual
emergency.
.2 reporting to the stations and preparing for the duties described in the muster
list;
.5 lowering of at least one lifeboat after the necessary preparation for launching;
.11 if the ship is fitted with marine evacuation systems, exercising of the
procedures required for the deployment of such systems up to the point
immediately preceding actual deployment.
7.4 If the lifeboat lowered during the drill is not the rescue boat, the rescue boat should
be lowered as well, taking into account that it is boarded and launched in the shortest possible
time. The PSCO should ensure that crew members are familiar with the duties assigned to
them during abandon ship operations and that the crew member in charge of the survival craft
has complete knowledge of the operation and equipment of the survival craft. Care needs to
be taken when requiring a ship to lower lifeboats. The number of persons inside the lifeboats
during launching for the purpose of a drill should be at the master's discretion noting that
SOLAS does not require persons in the lifeboat during lowering and recovery. The purpose of
this is to reduce the risk of accidents during launching and recovery; however, this must be
balanced out with the risk of embarking/disembarking the boat while it is in the water, if the
boat is to be taken away and run.
7.5 Each survival craft should be stowed in a state of continuous readiness so that two
crew members can carry out preparations for embarking and launching in less than
five minutes.
7.6 On passenger ships, it is required that lifeboats and davit-launched liferafts are
capable of being launched within a period of 30 minutes after all persons have been assembled
with lifejackets donned.
7.7 On cargo ships, it is required that lifeboats and davit launched liferafts are capable of
being launched within a period of 10 minutes.
8.1 After consultation with the master, the PSCO may require an enclosed space entry
and rescue drill. The essence of this drill is to confirm that crew members are familiar with the
procedure to enter enclosed space and rescue personnel safely, can demonstrate an enclosed
space entry and rescue drill and can communicate effectively when entering an enclosed
space in case of planned entry and/or an emergency situation.
8.2 The place of the drill can be selected at an assumed enclosed space; it is not
necessary to select an actual enclosed space.
8.3 The PSCO should check the structure of the enclosed space, the scenarios of the
drills and the responsible officers listed on the master list where applicable.
8.4 The enclosed space entry and rescue drill should include:
9.1 After consultation with the master, the PSCO may require an emergency steering drill.
The essence of this drill is to confirm crew members are familiar with the procedure of
emergency steering.
9.2 The PSCO may check the procedure and means of communication at both the
navigation bridge and the steering gear room.
10 Assessment of drills
.1 confirmation that the crew follow what is required of them by the muster list;
.5 confirmation that key members of the crew are able to understand each
other;
.7 confirmation that the response time was considered fast enough (taking into
account safety of the drill as indicated in paragraph 5.4 of this appendix),
considering the size of the ship and the locations of fire, personnel and
fire-fighting equipment.
10.2 If the PSCO determines that the crew are unfamiliar with their duties or incapable of
safely operating the life-saving and fire-fighting equipment, the PSCO should halt the drill,
notify the master that the drill was unsuccessful and use their professional judgement to
establish the next steps, noting the likelihood that this will establish "clear grounds" for a more
detailed inspection.
11 Damage control plan and Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) or
Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans (SMPEP)
11.1 The PSCO may determine if a damage control plan is provided on a passenger ship
and whether the crew members are familiar with their duties and the proper use of the ship's
installations and equipment for damage control purposes. The same applies with regard to
SOPEP on all ships and SMPEP where applicable.
11.2 The PSCO may determine if the officers of the ship are aware of the contents of the
damage control booklet which should be available to them, or of the damage control plan.
11.3 The officers may be asked to explain the action to be taken in various damage
conditions.
11.4 The officers may also be asked to explain about the boundaries of the watertight
compartments, the openings therein with the means of closure and position of any controls
thereof and the arrangements for the correction of any list due to flooding.
11.5 The officers should have a sound knowledge of the effect of trim and stability of their
ship in the event of damage to and consequent flooding of a compartment and
counter-measures to be taken.
12.1 The PSCO may determine if a fire control plan or booklet is provided and whether the
crew members are familiar with the information given in the fire control plan or booklet.
12.2 The PSCO may verify that fire control plans are permanently exhibited for the
guidance of the ship's officers. Alternatively, booklets containing the information of the fire
control plan may be supplied to each officer, and one copy should at all times be available on
board in an accessible position. Plans and booklets should be kept up to date, any alterations
being recorded thereon as soon as possible.
12.3 The PSCO may determine that the responsible officers, especially those who are
assigned to related duties on the muster list, are aware of the information provided by the fire
control plan or booklet and how to act in case of a fire.
12.4 The PSCO may ensure that the officers in charge of the ship are familiar with the
principal structural members which form part of the various fire sections and the means of
access to the different compartments.
13 Bridge operation
13.1 The PSCO may determine if officers in charge of a navigational watch are familiar
with bridge control and navigational equipment, changing the steering mode from automatic to
manual and vice versa, and the ship's manoeuvring characteristics.
13.2 The officer in charge of a navigational watch should have knowledge of the location
and operation of all safety and navigational equipment. Moreover, this officer should be familiar
with procedures which apply to the navigation of the ship in all circumstances and should be
aware of all information available.
13.3 The PSCO may also verify the familiarity of the officers on all the information available
to them such as manoeuvring characteristics of the ship, life-saving signals, up-to-date nautical
publications, checklists concerning bridge procedures, instructions, manuals, etc.
13.4 The Permit to Operate High-Speed Craft includes limitations of the maximum
significant wave height (and wind force for hovercraft) within which the craft may operate.
When carrying out inspections of HSC, PSCOs may verify by the log-book and the weather
records whether these limitations have been respected. PSCOs may find that a voyage had to
be completed when worse weather conditions than permitted were encountered and not
expected according to the weather forecast, but a new voyage should not commence in such
conditions.
13.5 The PSCO may verify the familiarity of the officers with procedures such as periodic
tests and checks of equipment, preparations for arrival and departure, changeover of steering
modes, signalling, communications, alarm system, manoeuvring, emergencies and log-book
entries.
14 Cargo operation
14.1 The PSCO may determine if ship's personnel assigned with specific duties related to
the cargo and cargo equipment are familiar with those duties, any dangers posed by the cargo
and with the measures to be taken in such a context. This will require the availability of all
relevant cargo information as required by SOLAS regulation VI/2.
14.2 With respect to the carriage of solid bulk cargoes, the PSCO should verify, as
appropriate, that cargo loading is performed in accordance with a ship's loading plan and
unloading in accordance with a ship's unloading plan agreed by the ship and the terminal,
taking into account the information provided by the loading instrument, where fitted.
14.3 The PSCO, when appropriate, may determine whether the responsible crew
members are familiar with the relevant provisions of the International Maritime Solid Bulk
Cargoes Code (IMSBC Code), particularly those concerning moisture limits and trimming of
the cargo. Additionally, it is expected that the responsible crew members have appropriate
knowledge of the recommendatory IMO Code of Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck
Cargoes (2011 TDC Code) and the Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing
(CSS Code) (Non-mandatory, except mandatory sub-chapter 1.9), as amended.
14.4 Some solid materials transported in bulk can present a hazard during transport
because of their chemical nature or physical properties. Section 2 of the IMSBC Code gives
general precautions. Section 4 of the IMSBC Code contains the obligation imposed on the
shipper to provide all necessary information to ensure a safe transport of the cargo. The PSCO
may determine whether all relevant details, including all relevant certificates of tests, have
been provided to the master by the shipper.
14.5 For some cargoes, such as cargoes which are subject to liquefaction, special
precautions are given (see section 7 of the IMSBC Code). The PSCO may determine whether
all precautions are met with special attention for the stability of those ships engaged in the
transport of cargoes subject to liquefaction and solid hazardous waste in bulk.
14.6 Officers responsible for cargo handling and operation and key crew members of oil
tankers, chemical tankers and liquefied gas carriers should be familiar with the cargo and cargo
equipment and with the safety measures as stipulated in the relevant sections of the IBC and
IGC Codes.
14.7 For the carriage of grain in bulk, reference is made to part C of chapter VI of SOLAS
and the mandatory International Code for the Safe Carriage of Grain in Bulk (Grain Code).
14.8 The PSCO may determine whether the operations and loading manuals include all
the relevant information for safe loading and unloading operations in port as well as in transit
conditions.
15.1 The PSCO may determine if responsible ship's personnel are familiar with their duties
related to operating essential machinery, such as:
15.2 The PSCO may verify whether the responsible ship's personnel are familiar with,
inter alia:
.1 emergency generator:
.3 procedures when the first attempts to start the engine fail; and
.3 load-sharing system.
15.3 The PSCO may verify whether the responsible ship's personnel are familiar with,
inter alia:
.3 what action is needed to bring the auxiliary steering gear into operation.
15.4 The PSCO may verify whether the responsible ship's personnel are familiar with,
inter alia:
.1 bilge pumps:
.2 fire pumps:
15.5 The PSCO may verify whether the responsible ship's personnel are familiar with,
inter alia:
.2 local control procedures for those systems which are normally controlled
from the navigating bridge;
.6 change of control from automatic to manual for cooling water and lube oil
systems for main and auxiliary engines.
16.1 The PSCO may determine if the appropriate crew members are able to understand
the information given in manuals, instructions, etc., relevant to the safe condition and operation
of the ship and its equipment and that they are aware of the requirements for maintenance,
periodic testing, training, drills and recording of log-book entries.
16.2 The following information, inter alia, should be provided on board and PSCOs may
determine whether it is in a language or languages understood by the crew and whether crew
members concerned are aware of the contents and are able to respond accordingly:
.4 posters and signs should be provided on or in the vicinity of survival craft and
their launching controls and shall illustrate the purpose of controls and the
procedures for operating the appliance and give relevant instructions or
warnings;
.6 training manuals should be provided in each crew mess room and recreation
room or in each crew cabin; the training manual, which may comprise several
volumes, should contain instructions and information, in easily understood
terms illustrated wherever possible, on the life-saving appliances provided in
the ship and on the best method of survival;
17.1 The PSCO may determine if all operational requirements of Annex I of MARPOL have
been met, taking into account:
17.2 An inspection of the ORB should be made. The PSCO may determine if reception
facilities have been used and note any alleged inadequacy of such facilities.
17.3 The PSCO may determine whether the responsible officer is familiar with the handling
of sludge and bilge water. The relevant items from the guidelines for systems for handling oily
wastes in machinery spaces of ships may be used as guidance. Taking into account the above,
the PSCO may determine if the ullage of the sludge tank is sufficient for the expected
generated sludge during the next intended voyage. The PSCO may verify that, in respect of
ships for which the Administration has waived the requirements of regulations 14(1) and (2) of
MARPOL Annex I, all oily bilge water is retained on board for subsequent discharge to a
reception facility.
17.4 When reception facilities in other ports have not been used because of inadequacy,
the PSCO should advise the master to report the inadequacy of the reception facility to the
ship's flag State, in conformity with the Format for reporting alleged inadequacies of port
reception facilities (MEPC.1/Circ.834/Rev.1, appendix 1 of the annex), as may be amended.
18.2 For the control on loading, unloading and cleaning procedures for tankers carrying oil,
reference is made to paragraphs 3.1 to 3.4 in appendix 5 where guidance is given for the
inspection of COW operations. In appendix 3, the PSCO may find detailed guidelines for in-
port inspection of crude oil washing procedures.
18.3 For the control on loading, unloading and cleaning procedures for tankers carrying
noxious liquid substances, reference is made to paragraphs 4.1 to 4.9 in appendix 5 where
guidance is given for the inspection of unloading, stripping and prewash operations.
In appendix 4 more detailed guidelines for these inspections are given.
18.4 When reception facilities in other ports have not been used because of inadequacy,
the PSCO should advise the master to report the inadequacy of the reception facility to the
ship's flag State, in conformity with MEPC.1/Circ.834/Rev.1, as may be amended.
18.5 The Garbage Record Book may be presented in an electronic format. A declaration
from the Administration should be viewed in order to accept this electronic record book. If a
declaration cannot be provided, a hard copy record book will need to be presented for
examination.
18.6 When a ship is permitted to proceed to the next port with residues of noxious liquid
substances on board in excess of those permitted to be discharged into the sea during the
ship's passage, it should be ascertained that the residues can be received by that port. At the
same time that port should be informed if practicable.
19.1 The PSCO may determine if the required shipping documents for the carriage of
dangerous goods and harmful substances carried in packaged form are provided on board
and whether the dangerous goods and harmful substances are properly stowed and
segregated and the crew members are familiar with the essential action to be taken in an
emergency involving such packaged cargo (see SOLAS regulation VII/3).
19.2 Ship types and cargo spaces of ships of over 500 gross tonnage built on or
after, 1 September 1984 and ship types and cargo spaces of ships of less than 500 gross
tonnage built on or after 1 February 1992 are to fully comply with the requirements of SOLAS
chapter II-2. Administrations may reduce the requirements for cargo ships of less
than 500 gross tonnage but such reductions shall be recorded in the document of compliance.
A document of compliance is not required for ships which only carry class 6.2, class 7 or
dangerous goods in limited quantities and excepted quantities.
19.3 Annex III of MARPOL contains requirements for the carriage of harmful substances
in packaged form which are identified in the IMDG Code as marine pollutants. Cargoes which
are determined to be marine pollutants should be labelled and stowed in accordance with
Annex III of MARPOL.
19.4 The PSCO may determine whether a Document of Compliance is on board and
whether the ship's personnel are familiar with this document provided by the Administration as
evidence of compliance of construction and equipment with the requirements. Additional
control may consist of:
.1 whether the dangerous goods have been stowed on board in conformity with
the Document of Compliance, using the dangerous goods manifest or the
stowage plan, required by chapter VII of SOLAS 1974,; this manifest or
stowage plan may be combined with the one required under MARPOL
Annex III;
.3 determining whether the ship's personnel are familiar with the relevant
provisions of the Medical First Aid Guide and Emergency Procedures for
Ships Carrying Dangerous Goods.
20 Garbage
20.1 The PSCO may determine if all operational requirements of MARPOL Annex V have
been met. The PSCO may determine if the reception facilities have been used and note any
alleged inadequacy of such facilities.
.2 ship's personnel are familiar with the disposal and discharge requirements
under Annex V of MARPOL inside and outside a special area and are aware
of the areas determined as special areas under Annex V of MARPOL.
20.4 When reception facilities in other ports have not been used because of inadequacy,
the PSCO should advise the master to report the inadequacy of the reception facility to the
ship's flag State, in conformity with MEPC.1/Circ.834/Rev.1, as may be amended.
21 Sewage
.2 that appropriate ship's personnel are familiar with the correct operation of the
sewage treatment system, comminuting and disinfecting system or holding
tank.
21.2 The PSCO may determine whether appropriate ship's personnel are familiar with the
discharge requirements of regulation 11 of MARPOL Annex IV.
21.3 When reception facilities in other ports have not been used because of inadequacy,
the PSCO should advise the master to report the inadequacy of the reception facility to the
ship's flag State, in conformity with the waste reception facility reporting requirements
(MEPC.1/Circ.834/Rev.1, as may be amended).
.2 the master or crew is familiar with the proper operation and maintenance of
diesel engines, in accordance with their Technical Files;
.4 the master or crew is familiar with the garbage screening procedure to ensure
that prohibited garbage is not incinerated;
.5 the master or crew is familiar with the operation of the shipboard incinerator,
as required by regulation 16.2 of MARPOL Annex VI, within the limit provided
in appendix IV to the Annex, in accordance with the operational manual;
APPENDIX 8
1 GENERAL
1.1 The International Safety Management Code (ISM Code) was adopted by the
Assembly at its eighteenth session by resolution A.741(18) and was amended by resolutions
MSC.104(73), MSC.179(79), MSC.195(80), MSC.273(85) and MSC.353(92). The ISM Code
has been made mandatory through SOLAS 1974 regulation IX/3.
1.2 The Administration is responsible for verifying compliance with the requirements of
the ISM Code and issuing Documents of Compliance to companies and Safety Management
Certificates to ships. This verification is carried out by the Administration or a recognized
organization (RO).
1.3 Port State control officers (PSCOs) do not perform safety management audits. ISM
auditing is the responsibility of the flag State and the Company and does not fall under the
scope of port State control. PSCOs conduct inspections of ship, which are a sampling process
and give a snapshot of the vessel on a particular day.
1.4 The SMS documentation is in the ship's working language which may not be
understood by the PSCO. The procedure may not be harmonized if the PSCO is only able to
review the SMS documentation on those ships where they can understand the language.
2.1 The guidelines provide guidance to PSCOs for the harmonized application of related
technical or operational deficiencies found in relation to the ISM Code during a PSC inspection.
3 APPLICATION
3.1 The ISM Code applies to the following types of ships engaged in international
voyages:
.2 oil tankers, chemical tankers, gas carriers, bulk carriers and cargo
high-speed craft of 500 gross tonnage and above; and
.3 other cargo ships and self-propelled mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs)
of 500 gross tonnage and above.
3.2 For establishing the applicability chapter IX of SOLAS and the ISM Code, "gross
tonnage" means the gross tonnage of the ship as determined under the provisions
of TONNAGE 1969, and as stated on the International Tonnage Certificate of the ship.
3.3 The ISM Code does not apply to government-operated ships used for non-commercial
purposes.
4 RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION
.1 SOLAS;
.2 ISM Code;
Procedures for Procedures for port State control, 2019, as adopted by resolution
port State A.[…](31), as may be amended
control:
Company: "The owner of the ship or any other organization or person such as
the manager, or the bareboat charterer, who has assumed the
responsibility for operation of the ship from the shipowner and who,
on assuming such responsibility, has agreed to take over all duties
and responsibility imposed by the Code."
Administration: "The Government of the State whose flag the ship is entitled to fly."
"A document issued to a ship which signifies that the company and
its shipboard management operate in accordance with the approved
safety management system."
Valid certificate: "A certificate that has been issued, electronically or on paper,
directly by a Party to a relevant convention or on its behalf by a
recognized organization and contains: accurate and effective dates;
meets the provisions of the relevant convention; and, with which the
particulars of the ship, her crew and her equipment correspond."
ISM related: A technical and/or operational deficiency which has been assessed
by the PSCO to be objective evidence of a failure, or lack of
effectiveness, of the implementation of the ISM Code, and which is
marked as "ISM related" in the inspection report
6 INSPECTION OF SHIP
6.1.1 Initial inspection should be carried out in accordance with the Procedures for port
State control.
6.1.2 During the initial PSC inspection, the PSCO should verify that the ship carries the ISM
certificates according to the provisions of chapter IX of SOLAS and the ISM Code by examining
the copy of the DOC and the SMC, for which the following points are to be considered:
.2 The SMC is not valid unless the operating company holds a valid DOC for
that ship type. The ship type in the SMC should be included in the DOC and
the company's particulars should be the same on both the DOC and the
SMC. The SMC should have the required endorsements.
.4 ROs may issue a short-term DOC or SMC not exceeding five months, while
the full-term certificate is being prepared in accordance with their internal
.6 No SMC should be extended for a period of longer than three months, and
the ship to when an extension is granted should not, on her arrival in the port
in which it is to be verified, be entitled by virtue of such extension to leave
that port without having a new SMC. When the renewal verification is
completed, the new SMC should be valid to a date not exceeding five years
from the expiry date of the existing SMC before the extension was granted.
6.2.1 Since the PSCO is not carrying out a safety management audit of the SMS during a
PSC inspection, the term "clear grounds" is not applicable in this context.
6.2.2 Clear grounds and the subsequent more detailed inspection only exist for technical or
operational deficiencies.
6.3.2 If an outstanding ISM related deficiency from a previous PSC inspection exists and
the current PSC inspection is more than three months later, the PSCO will verify, during the
present PSC inspection, the effectiveness of any corrective action taken by the Company by
examining the areas of the technical and/or operational deficiencies of the previous PSC
inspection report which led to the issuance of the ISM deficiency.
7 FOLLOW-UP ACTION
7.1.1 The principles outlined in the Procedures for port State control with regard to reporting
and rectification of technical or operational deficiencies, and detention and release of the ship
are applicable.
Note: Where the PSCO considers one or more technical and/or operational
deficiency(s) are related to the ISM Code this should be recorded as only
one ISM deficiency.
7.1.3 The PSCO will verify the effectiveness of any corrective action as described in
section 6.3.2. If examination of the areas in relation to an ISM deficiency with the requirement
corrective action within 3 months found not satisfactory, a new detainable ISM deficiency with
the requirement that a safety management audit has to be carried by the Administration or the
RO will be raised. In this case the PSCO should apply the following procedure:
.2 mark the deficieny(ies) "ISM related" and add in the additional comments the
following text: "This deficiency shows a non-effective implementation of the
ISM Code in the areas where ISM deficiency(ies) were found during the PSC
inspection on _____"; and
.3 record a new detainable ISM deficiency with the requirement that a safety
management audit has to be conducted by the Administration or the RO
before the ship may be released from detention.
7.2.1 Minor typing errors in the DOC, the interim DOC, the SMC, or interim SMC should be
recorded in the PSC inspection report as a technical deficiency with the certificates and no
ISM deficiency should be recorded.
.2 there is no SMC, interim SMC and/or copy of the DOC or interim DOC on
board the ship;
.7 the ship type as indicated on the SMC or interim SMC is not listed on the
DOC or interim DOC;
.9 the certificate number on the copy of the DOC and the endorsement pages
are not the same; and
.10 the company name, the company address or the issuing Government
authority on the DOC or interim DOC is not the same as on the SMC or
interim SMC.
8 REPORTING
8.1.2 A technical deficiency with the defective item DOC/SMC or interim DOC/SMC should
be recorded in the PSC inspection report under the deficiency code addressing the DOC or
SMS respectively.
8.2 ISM deficiency
Where the PSCO has considered the technical and/or operational deficiencies found and
concluded these provide objective evidence of a failure, serious failure or lack of effectiveness
of the implementation of the ISM Code, an ISM deficiency should be recorded in the PSC
inspection report.
APPENDIX 9
1 PURPOSE
These Guidelines are intended to provide basic guidance to port State control officers (PSCOs)
to verify compliance with the requirements of SOLAS 1974 for Long Range Identification and
Tracking (LRIT).
2 APPLICATION
2.1 LRIT equipment is required by the provisions of SOLAS 1974 regulation V/19-1, and
the Revised performance standards and functional requirements for the Long Range
Identification and Tracking of ships (resolution MSC.263(84)), as amended, requires all
passenger ships, cargo ships (including high-speed craft) over 300 gross tonnage and mobile
offshore drilling units (MODUs) to send LRIT position information at least every 6 hours. Ships
fitted with an automatic identification system (AIS) and operated exclusively within sea area
A1 are not required to comply with LRIT. Sea area A1 is defined by SOLAS 1974
regulation IV/2.1.12 as "an area within the radiotelephone coverage of at least one VHF coast
station in which continuous DSC alerting is available, as may be defined by a Contracting
Government".
2.2 SOLAS Contracting Governments are expected to maintain an LRIT data centre,
either on a national basis, or on a regional or cooperative basis with other flag States, and
notify the IMO of it. In turn, these LRIT data centres will forward, upon request, LRIT
information from ships entitled to fly their flags, to other SOLAS Contracting Governments
through the International LRIT Data Exchange. Port States are entitled to request the LRIT
information from foreign ships that have indicated their intention to enter a port, port facility or
place under its jurisdiction.
2.3 In most cases a stand-alone Inmarsat C or Inmarsat mini-C terminal used for GMDSS
or ship security alert system will function as the LRIT terminal, but other equipment may be
employed for the LRIT function (example Inmarsat D+ or Iridium).
3.1.1 The PSCO should first establish the sea area the ship is certified to operate in.
This verification should ensure that the ship is subject to the LRIT regulation in relation to its
ship type and tonnage. After the certificate check, the PSCO should verify that:
* Note: A Record of Equipment is required for cargo ships greater than 500 gross tonnage and passenger
ships.
† Note: In exceptional circumstances and for the shortest duration possible LRIT is capable of being switched
off or may transmit less frequently (SOLAS 1974 regulation V/19-1.7.2 and resolution MSC.263(84),
paragraph 4.4.1).
3.1.2 In case of recent transfer of flag, the PSCO may further ensure that:
.1 a conformance test report has been re-issued if the new flag State does not
recognize the issuing body of the existing conformance test report; or
.2 a new conformance test has been carried out by the application service
provider (ASP) on behalf of the Administration before issuance of a new test
report and certificate.
Conditions which may warrant a more detailed inspection of equipment used for LRIT may
comprise the following:
.4 the "record of navigational activities" indicates that the LRIT installation has
been switched off and that this has not been reported to the flag
Administration as required by SOLAS 1974 regulation V/19-1.7.2.
3.3.1 In case of doubt or reports of malfunctioning of the LRIT installation, the flag
Administration may be contacted to determine if the ship's LRIT information has been reliably
relayed to the LRIT data centre.
3.3.2 If any issues are identified at the initial inspection, a more detailed inspection of
equipment used for LRIT may comprise the following:
.3 ensuring that any conformance test report is issued on behalf of the flag
State, even by itself or by an authorized application service provider
(see MSC.1/Circ.1377/Rev.11 and further version as shown in GISIS),
available for a ship that has an LRIT installation.
4.1 A PSCO should use professional judgement to determine whether to detain the ship
until any noted deficiencies are corrected or to permit a vessel to sail with deficiencies.
4.2 In order to assist the PSCO in the use of these Guidelines, the following deficiencies
should be considered to be of such nature that they may warrant the detention of a ship:
.2 the master or the responsible officer is not familiar with essential shipboard
operational procedures relating to LRIT.
4.3 Taking into account the guidance found in the Guidance on the implementation of the
LRIT system (MSC.1/Circ.1298), PSCOs are also advised that ships should not be detained if
the LRIT installation on board works, but the shore-side installation or organization is not able
to receive, relay or process the information.
4.4 PSCOs are advised that a flag State may issue a short-term certificate; this could
happen if, following a successful inspection for the issuance of a Conformity Test report, the
ASP has not been able to issue a document yet, or if the ASP is not able to perform a
conformance test in due time upon the request of the shipowner.
SOLAS 1974 regulation V/16.2: "Whilst all reasonable steps shall be taken to maintain the equipment
required by this chapter in efficient working order, malfunctions of that equipment shall not be considered as
making the ship unseaworthy or as a reason for delaying the ship in ports where repair facilities are not
readily available, provided suitable arrangements are made by the master to take the inoperative equipment
or unavailable information into account in planning and executing a safe voyage to a port where repairs can
take place."
APPENDIX 10
.1 new ships, i.e. ships the keels of which were laid on or after 18 July 1982;
and
.2 existing ships, i.e. ships the keels of which were laid before 18 July 1982,
as from 18 July 1994,
except that for the purpose of application of SOLAS 1974, MARPOL and STCW 1978
Conventions, the following interim schemes indicated in paragraph 2 may apply.
.3 cargo ships of less than 1,600 tons gross tonnage (as determined
under the national tonnage rules) the keels of which were laid on or
after 1 January 1986 but before 18 July 1994; and
.2 for the purpose of MARPOL, ships of less than 400 tons gross tonnage
(as determined under the national tonnage rules) the keels of which were laid
before 18 July 1994.
3 For ships to which the above interim schemes apply, a statement to the effect that the
gross tonnage has been measured in accordance with the national tonnage rules should be
included in the "REMARKS" column of the International Tonnage Certificate and in the footnote
to the figure of the gross tonnage in the relevant SOLAS 1974 and MARPOL certificates.
4 The port State control officer (PSCO) should take the following actions as appropriate
when deficiencies are found in relation to the TONNAGE 1969:
.1 if a ship does not hold a valid International Tonnage Certificate, the ship loses
all privileges of the TONNAGE 1969, and the flag State should be informed
without delay;
.2 if the required remarks and footnote are not included in the relevant
certificates on ships to which the interim schemes apply, this deficiency
should be notified to the master; and
Resolutions A.494(XII) in respect of SOLAS, A.540(13) in respect of STCW 78, and A.541(13) in respect of
MARPOL.
.3 if the main characteristics of the ship differ from those entered on the
International Tonnage Certificate, so as to lead to an increase in the gross
tonnage or net tonnage, the flag State should be informed without delay.
5 The control provisions of article 12 of the TONNAGE 1969 do not include the provision
for detention of a ship holding a valid International Tonnage Certificate.
APPENDIX 11
1 GENERAL
The International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS 1974) was adopted in 1974
and entered into force in 1980. Similarly, the International Convention on Standards of
Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW 1978) was adopted in 1978
and entered into force in 1984. Both have been amended several times since their entry into
force.
These Guidelines are intended to provide guidance for a harmonized approach of port State
control (PSC) inspections in compliance with SOLAS 1974 regulations V/14 (manning) and I/2
(seafarer certification) and chapter VIII (hours of rest) of the STCW 1978, as amended.
3 APPLICATION
3.1 SOLAS 1974 regulation V/14.2 only applies to ships covered by chapter I of
SOLAS 1974. STCW 1978, as amended, applies to seafarers serving on board seagoing
ships. The STCW Code is divided into a mandatory part A and a non-mandatory part B.
Part B of the STCW Code is not applicable during the inspection.
3.2 All passenger ships regardless of size and all other ships of 500 gross tonnage or
more should have a minimum safe manning document or equivalent on board issued by the
flag State.
3.3 Any new or single deficiency which is either a deficiency related to SOLAS 1974,
STCW 1978 or other IMO conventions, should preferably be registered with these
conventions references.
4 RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION
The documentation required for the inspection referred to in these Guidelines consist of:
Seafarer certification
.1 certificate of competency;
.2 certificate of proficiency;
.5 medical certificate;
Manning
.7 muster list;
Hours of rest
5.1 Certificate of Competency means a certificate issued and endorsed for masters,
officers and Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) radio operators in
accordance with the provisions of chapters II, III, IV or VII of STCW 1978 and entitling
the lawful holder thereof to serve in the capacity and perform the functions involved at the
level of responsibility specified therein.
6 INSPECTION OF SHIP
6.1.1 Taking into account the type, size, engine power and other particulars of the ship,
the port State control officer (PSCO) should be aware of the relevant requirements of
SOLAS 1974 regulation V/14 and STCW 1978.
6.1.2 The PSCO should be aware that resolutions are non-mandatory documents and not
applicable during a PSC inspection.
6.1.3 The PSCO should also identify if the flag State is a Party to STCW 1978, as
amended. If the flag State is not a Party to the Convention or is a Party but not listed in
MSC.1/Circ.1163, as amended, a more detailed inspection should be carried out.
6.2.1 The PSCO should examine the applicable documents, found in section 4.
6.2.2 The inspection should be limited to verification that seafarers serving on board, who
are required to be certificated, hold the appropriate CoC, CoP and documentary evidence
issued in accordance with chapters II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of STCW 1978, as amended, as
well as their relevant flag State endorsement, valid dispensation, or documentary proof that
an application for an endorsement has been submitted to the flag State Administration, where
applicable. These documents are evidence of having successfully completed all required
training and that the required standard of competence has been achieved.
6.2.3 During the verification of the seafarers' certificates and documents, the PSCO should
confirm that they are applicable to the ship's characteristics, operation and their position on
board.
6.2.4 In accordance with the provision of article VI paragraph 2 of STCW 1978, certificates
for masters and officers should be endorsed by the issuing Administration in the form
prescribed in regulation I/2 of the annex to the Convention.
6.2.5 The certificates may be issued as one certificate with the required endorsement
incorporated. If so incorporated, the form used should be that set forth in section A-I/2,
paragraph 1 of the STCW Code.
6.2.6 The endorsement may also be issued as a separate document. If so, the form used
should be that set forth in section A-I/2, paragraph 2 of the STCW Code.
6.2.7 However, Administrations may use a format for certificates and endorsements
different from those given in section A-I/2 of the STCW Code, provided that, at a minimum,
the required information is provided in Roman characters and Arabic figures. Permitted
variations to the format are set out in section A-I/2, paragraph 4 of the STCW Code.
6.2.8 Certificates and endorsements issued as separate documents should each be assigned
a unique number, except that endorsements attesting the issuance of a certificate may be
assigned the same number as the certificate concerned, provided that number is unique.
6.2.9 Certificates and endorsements issued as separate documents should include a date
of expiry. The date of expiry on an endorsement issued as a separate document should not
exceed 5 years from the date of issue and may never exceed the date of expiry on the
certificate.
6.2.10 A CoP issued to a master or an officer in accordance with regulation V/1-1 or V/1-2,
as well as a CoC that has been issued by a State other than the flag State of the ship in
which the seafarer is engaged, is required to be recognized by the ship's flag State. If the
PSCO identifies that the flag State has recognized a CoC or CoP from a Party not listed in
MSC.1/Circ.1163, as amended, clarification should be sought from the flag Administration.
According to regulation I/10, paragraph 4 of STCW 1978, certificates issued by or under the
authority of a non-Party shall not be recognized by the ship's flag State Administration.
6.2.11 An Administration which recognizes under regulation I/10 a CoC or CoP issued to
masters and officers should endorse that certificate to attest to its recognition. The form of
the endorsement should be that found in section A-I/2 paragraph 3 of the STCW Code.
6.2.12 Incorrect wording or missing information may be a cause for suspicion regarding
fraudulent certificates or endorsements.
6.2.15 The capacity in which the holder of a certificate is authorized to serve should be
identified in the form of endorsement in terms identical to those used in the applicable safe
manning requirements of the Administration. This may result in slight variations of terminology
between the original CoC and the endorsement to the recognition.
6.2.16 Seafarers must have their original CoC on board as well as any original endorsements
to the recognition. An endorsement attesting the recognition of a certificate should not entitle
a seafarer to serve in a higher capacity than the original CoC.
6.2.17 If circumstances require it, a flag State Administration may permit a seafarer to serve
for a period not exceeding three months on ships entitled to fly its flag while holding a valid
CoC issued by another party and valid for service on that party's ships. If such a situation
exists, documentary proof must be readily available that an application for endorsement has
been made to the Administration of the flag State. This is often referred to as the confirmation
of receipt of application (CRA). This provision allows Administrations to permit seafarers to
serve on their ships while the application for recognition is being processed.
6.2.19 In cases of suspected intoxication of masters, officers and/or other seafarers while
performing designated safety, security and marine environmental protection duties, the
appropriate Authorities of the port and flag State should be notified in accordance with
chapters 3 and 4 of the Procedures for port State control.
6.2.20 Seafarers should have a valid medical certificate and have completed applicable
familiarization on board the ship. If such crew members are assigned to any designated safety,
security or environmental prevention duties, they must be trained and qualified for such duties
in accordance with the applicable chapter of the STCW Code.
6.2.21 In accordance with section A-VI/1, paragraph 5 of the STCW Code, the flag State
Administration may exempt the seafarers engaged on ships, other than passenger ships of
more than 500 gross tonnage on international voyages and tankers from some of the
requirements of that section.
Manning
6.2.22 The PSCO should examine the applicable documents, found in section 4.
6.2.23 The guiding principles for port State control of the manning of a foreign ship should be:
.2 verification that the vessel and its personnel conform to the international
provisions as laid down in SOLAS 1974 and STCW 1978.
6.2.25 If the flag State Administration has not issued a safe manning document or equivalent
due to the ship's size the PSCO should examine the CoC, CoP and their relevant flag State
endorsement for the crew and compare with the requirements of STCW 1978. Regarding the
number of seafarers, the PSCO should then use his or her professional judgement, taking into
account chapter VIII of STCW 1978 and the STCW Code and the duration and area of the next
voyage, to determine if it can be undertaken safely. The PSCO should note the number of
seafarers on board during the previous voyage as another indicator of standard manning levels
for the ship. The PSCO should consult the flag State Administration, if additional information
is necessary.
6.2.26 If an endorsement to attest recognition has expired or has not been issued or
documentary proof of application for endorsement (CRA) is not readily available, the PSCO
should consider whether the ship can comply with the applicable safe manning requirements
of the flag State Administration. In cases where the PSCO finds that additional information is
necessary, the flag State Administration should be consulted.
6.2.27 If the flag State does not respond to the request this should be considered as clear
grounds for a more detailed inspection to ensure that the number and composition of the crew
is in accordance with the principles laid down in paragraph 6.2.23 above. The ship should only
be allowed to proceed to sea if it is safe to do so, taking into account the criteria for detention
indicated in section 7.3. In any such case, the minimum standards to be applied should be no
more stringent than those applied to ships flying the flag of the port State.
Hours of rest
6.2.28 All persons who are assigned duty as officer in charge of a watch or as a rating forming
part of a watch and those whose duties involve designated safety, security and environmental
protection duties shall be provided with a rest period of not less than:
6.2.29 The hours of rest may be divided into no more than two periods, one of which shall
be at least 6 hours in length, and the intervals between consecutive periods of rest shall not
exceed 14 hours.
6.2.30 The PSCO should examine the applicable documents, found in section 4, specifically
the watch schedule and the records of daily hours of rest. The PSCO may inspect the
seafarer's personal copy of his or her records pertaining to the hours of rest being held by the
seafarer on board in order to verify that the records are accurate.
6.2.31 The watch schedule shall be in a standardized format*, easily accessible to the crew
and posted in the working language or languages of the ship and in English.
6.2.32 Daily hours of rest shall be maintained in a standardized format † , in the working
language or languages of the ship and in English.
6.2.33 The PSCO should consider that seafarers who are on call, such as when a machinery
space is unattended, are to be provided with an adequate compensatory rest period if the
normal period is disturbed by call-outs to work.
6.2.34 While assessing hours of rest, the PSCO should take into account any emergency
conditions encountered which required a seafarer to perform additional hours of work for the
immediate safety of the ship. In such cases, the master should be consulted for an explanation
of the events and how impacted seafarers were provided with an adequate period of rest.
6.3.1 Clear grounds are defined in section 1.7.2 of the Procedures for port State control.
6.3.2 In addition to the general examples of clear grounds in section 2.4 of the Procedures,
the specific occurrences as outlined in paragraph 1.3 of regulation I/4 of STCW 1978, below
are considered as factors leading to a more detailed inspection:
.2 there has been a discharge of substances from the ship when under way, at
anchor or at berth which is illegal under any international convention; or
* The IMO/ILO Guidelines for the development of tables of seafarers' shipboard working arrangements and
formats of records of seafarers' hours of work or hours of rest may be used.
† The IMO/ILO Guidelines for the development of tables of seafarers' shipboard working arrangements and
formats of records of seafarers' hours of work or hours of rest may be used.
.1 that seafarers are sufficiently rested and otherwise fit for duty for the first
watch at the commencement of the intended voyage and for subsequent
relieving watches; this may be done by comparing records of daily hours of
rest with the requirements in STCW 1978 for an appropriate period, which
should at least include, whenever possible, the seven-day period
immediately prior to departure; the rest period must reflect actual hours
worked;
6.4.2 An assessment of seafarers can only be conducted by the port State if there are clear
grounds for believing that the ability of the seafarers of the ship to maintain watchkeeping and
security standards, as appropriate, as required by STCW 1978 is not being maintained
because any of the situations mentioned in paragraphs 6.3.2.1 to 6.3.2.4 have occurred:
.1 the assessment procedure provided in STCW 1978 regulation I/4,
paragraph 1.3, should take the form of a verification that members of the
crew who are required to be competent do in fact possess the necessary
skills related to the occurrence;
.2 it should be borne in mind when making this assessment that onboard
procedures are relevant to the International Safety Management (ISM) Code
and that the provisions of STCW 1978 are confined to the competence to
safely execute those procedures;
.3 control procedures under STCW 1978 should be confined to the standards
of competence of the individual seafarers on board and their skills related to
watchkeeping as defined in part A of the STCW Code. Onboard assessment
of competency should commence with verification of the certificates of the
seafarers;
.4 notwithstanding verification of the certificate, the assessment under the
STCW 1978 regulation I/4, paragraph 1.3 can require the seafarer to
demonstrate the related competency at the place of duty. Such
demonstration may include verification that operational requirements in
respect of watchkeeping standards have been met and that there is a proper
response to emergency situations within the seafarer's level of competence;
.5 in the assessment, only the methods for demonstrating competence
together with the criteria for its evaluation and the scope of the standards
given in part A of the STCW Code should be used. In cases where doubt of
knowledge on operational use of equipment exist, the relevant officer or
crew member should be asked to perform a functional test. Failure to
perform a functional test could indicate the lack of familiarization or
competency; and
7 FOLLOW-UP ACTION
Possible action to be considered by the PSCO for the control in compliance with SOLAS 1974
or STCW 1978 may be dealt with in the following ways:
Seafarers' documentation:
.4 information or evidence that the master or crew is not familiar with essential
shipboard operations relating to the safety of ships or the prevention of
pollution, or that such operations have not been carried out.
Manning:
Hours of rest:
.10 the watchkeeper is receiving less than 10 hours rest in any 24-hour period
(i.e. working in excess of 14 hours) or 77 hours rest in any 7-day period
(STCW Code A-VIII/1).
7.3.1 Deficiencies which may be deemed to pose a danger to persons, property or the
environment as specified in paragraph 2 of regulation I/4 of STCW 1978, as amended:
.5 inability to provide, for the first watch at the commencement of a voyage and
for subsequent relieving watches, persons who are sufficiently rested and
otherwise fit for duty.
7.3.2 Failure to correct any of the deficiencies, in so far as it has been determined by the
PSCO that they pose a danger to persons, property or the environment, shall be the only
grounds under STCW 1978, as amended, on which a ship may be detained.
7.3.3 Examples of detainable deficiencies according to SOLAS 1974 and STCW 1978 are
listed below:
Ship-related:
.2 records of daily hours of rest are not on board ( STCW Code A-VIII/1.7); and
Seafarers' documentation:
Ship-related
7.4.1 If the actual number of crew or composition does not conform to the manning
document, the port State should request the flag State for advice as to whether or not the ship
should be allowed to sail with the actual number of crew and composition of crew. Such a
request and response should be by the most expedient means and either party may request
the communication in writing. If the actual crew number or composition is not brought into
compliance with the MSMD or the flag State does not advise that the ship may sail, the ship
may be considered for detention after the criteria set out in section 7.3 have been taken into
account.
7.4.2 Before detaining the ship the PSCO should consider the following:
.5 nature of cargo.
Deficiency-related
7.4.3 When the manning is not in accordance with the MSMD and no flag State
endorsements or no "documentary proof of application" can be presented, the port State
should consult the flag State whenever possible taking into account time differences or other
conditions. However, if it is not possible to establish contact with the flag State, the port State
should forthwith inform, in writing, the master of the ship and the Consul or, in their absence,
the nearest diplomatic representative or the maritime authority of the State whose flag the ship
is entitled to fly, so that appropriate action may be taken.
7.4.4 In cases where an unqualified seafarer has been on duty and/or the watch schedule
has not been followed, the flag State should be informed and this could be considered as an
ISM deficiency.
7.4.5 In cases where there is a seafarer on duty who is not qualified to carry out an
operation, that particular operation should be stopped immediately.
The PSCO should be aware that, in addition to SOLAS 1974 and STCW 1978, there may be
other applicable international instruments. The PSCO should decide which one is the most
appropriate.
ANNEX
Table B-I/2
The list below identifies all certificates or documentary evidence described in STCW 1978
which authorize the holder to serve in certain functions on board ships. The certificates are
subject to the requirements of regulation I/2 regarding language and their availability in original
form.
The list also references the relevant regulations and the requirements for endorsement,
registration and revalidation.
Notes:
5 The certificates of competency issued in accordance with regulations II/1, II/2, II/3,
III/1, III/2, III/3, III/6 and VII/2 include the proficiency requirements in "basic
training", "survival craft and rescue boats other than fast rescue boats", "advanced
fire-fighting" and "medical first aid" therefore, holders of mentioned certificates
of competency are not required to carry Certificates of Proficiency in respect of
those competences of chapter VI.
6 In accordance with sections A-VI/1, A-VI/2 and A-VI/3, seafarers shall provide
evidence of having maintained the required standards of competence every five
years.
8 In accordance with regulation V/3, seafarers shall, at intervals not exceeding five
years, undertake appropriate refresher training or be required to provide evidence
of having achieved the required standard of competence within the previous five
years.
APPENDIX 12
PART A
List of certificates and documents which to the extent applicable should be checked as a
minimum during the inspection referred to in paragraph 2.2.3 (as appropriate):
10 International Load Line Certificate (1966) (LL 1966/LL PROT 1988 article 16.1);
11 International Load Line Exemption Certificate (LL 1966/LL PROT 1988 article 16.2);
17 International Ballast Water Management Certificate (BWM 2004 article 9.1(a) and
regulation E-2);
21 Certificates for masters, officers or ratings (STCW 1978 article VI, regulation I/2 and
STCW Code section A-I/2);
24 International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk, or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk, whichever is
appropriate (IGC Code regulation 1.5.4 or GC Code regulation 1.6);
27 Certificate of insurance or other financial security in respect of civil liability for oil
pollution damage (CLC 69/92 article VII.2);
28 Certificate of insurance or other financial security in respect of civil liability for Bunker
oil pollution damage (BUNKERS 2001 article 7.2);
30 High-Speed Craft Safety Certificate and Permit to Operate High-Speed Craft (SOLAS 1974
regulation X/3.2 and 1994/2000 HSC Code regulations 1.8.1 and 1.9);
31 Document of compliance with the special requirements for ships carrying dangerous
goods (SOLAS 1974 regulation II-2/19.4);
32 Document of authorization for the carriage of grain and grain loading manual (SOLAS
1974 regulation VI/9 and Grain Code section 3);
35 Oil Record Book, parts I and II (MARPOL Annex I regulations 17 and 36);
39 Log-book and the recordings of the tier and on/off status of marine diesel engines
(MARPOL Annex VI regulation13.5.3);
43 Ballast Water Record Book (BWM 2004 Article9.1 (b) and regulation B-2);
44 Fixed gas fire-extinguishing systems – cargo spaces Exemption Certificate and any
list of cargoes (SOLAS 1974 regulation II-2/10.7.1.4);
46 For oil tankers, the record of oil discharge monitoring and control system for the last
ballast voyage (MARPOL Annex I regulation 31.2);
46 Search and Rescue cooperation plan for passenger ships trading on fixed routes
(SOLAS 1974 regulation V/7.3);
47 For passenger ships, List of operational limitations (SOLAS 1974 regulation V/30.2);
49 Records of hours of rest and table of shipboard working arrangements (STCW Code
section A-VIII/1.5 and 1.7, ILO Convention No.180 article 5.7, art. 8.1 and MLC 2006
Standard A.2.3.10 and A.2.3.12);
Part B
List of other certificates and documents which to the extent applicable are required to be on
board (as appropriate):
4 Stability information (SOLAS 1974 regulations II-1/5 and II-1/5-1 and LLC 1966/LL
PROT 1988 reg. 10);
8 Enhanced Survey Report Files (in case of bulk carriers or oil tankers) (SOLAS 1974
regulation XI 1/2 and 2011 ESP Code paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 of annex A, part A and
part B, and annex B, part A and part B);
9 Cargo Securing Manual (SOLAS 1974 regulation VI/5.6 and VII/5 and
MSC.1/Circ.1353/Rev.1);
10 Bulk Carrier Booklet (SOLAS 1974 regulations VI/7.2 and XII/8 and BLU Code);
12 Cargo Information (SOLAS 1974 regulations VI/2 and XII/10 and MSC/Circ.663);
18 Ship-specific Plans and Procedures for Recovery of Persons from the Water (SOLAS
1974 regulation III/17-1, MSC.346(91) and MSC.1/Circ.1447);
22 Ship Security Plan and associated records (SOLAS 1974 regulation XI-2/9 and ISPS
Code part A/9 and 10);
23 Engine International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate (NOx Technical Code 2008
regulation 2.1.1.1);
29 Fuel oil Changeover Procedure for fuel oil changeover (MARPOL Annex VI
regulation 14.6);
31 Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (MARPOL Annex I regulation 37.1 and
resolution MEPC.54(32), as amended by resolution MEPC.86(44));
34 STS Operation Plan and Records of STS Operations (MARPOL Annex I reg. 41);
37 Ballast Water Management Plan (BWM 2004 regulation B-1 and resolution
MEPC.127(53), as amended);
39 Copy of the Certificate of compliance issued by the testing facility, stating the date of
compliance and the applicable performance standards of VDR (voyage data recorder)
(SOLAS 1974 regulation V/18.8);
42 Oil Discharge Monitoring and Control (ODMC) Operational Manual (MARPOL Annex I
regulation 31; resolution A.496(XII); resolution A.586(14), as amended by resolution
MEPC.24(22); resolution MEPC.108(49), as amended by resolution MEPC.240(65));
44 Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) (SOLAS 1974 regulation VI/5-1 and
MSC.286(86));
For reference:
2 Certificates as to the ship's hull strength and machinery installations issued by the
classification society in question (only to be required if the ship maintains its class with
a classification society);
3 Cargo Gear Record Book (ILO Convention No.32 article 9.2(4) and ILO Convention
No.152 article 25);
4 Certificates loading and unloading equipment (ILO Convention No.134 article 4.3(e)
and ILO Convention No.32 article 9(4));
6 Records of hours of work or rest of seafarers (ILO Convention No.180 part II article 8.1
or MLC 2006 Standard A.2.3.12);
8 Declaration of Maritime Labour compliance on board (parts I and II) (MLC 2006
regulation 5.1.3);
APPENDIX 13
FORM A
15 Relevant certificate(s)**
Telephone ...................................................
This report must be retained on board for a period of two years and must be available
for consultation by port State control officers at all times.
________________
* This inspection report has been issued solely for the purposes of informing the master and other port States
that an inspection by the port State, mentioned in the heading, has taken place. This inspection report cannot
be construed as a seaworthiness certificate in excess of the certificate the ship is required to carry.
**
To be completed in the event of a detention.
*** Masters, shipowners and/or operators are advised that detailed information on a detention may be subject
to future publication.
FORM B
Name ......................................................
(duly authorized PSCO of reporting
authority)
Signature .................................................
______________
1 This inspection was not a full survey and deficiencies listed may not be exhaustive. In the event of a
detention, it is recommended that full survey is carried out and all deficiencies are rectified before an
application for re-inspection is made.
2 To be completed in the event of a detention.
3 Actions taken include: ship detained/released, flag State informed, classification society informed, next port
informed.
APPENDIX 14
REPORT OF DEFICIENCIES
NOT FULLY RECTIFIED OR ONLY PROVISIONALLY RECTIFIED
17 Action taken
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
…………………………………………………….………………………………………………
APPENDIX 15
8 Action taken
Signature ...........................................
APPENDIX 16
(resolution A.[…](31))
.4 reports of analyses of samples taken of the slick and on board; the reports
should include the results of the analyses, a description of the method
employed, reference to or copies of scientific documentation attesting to the
accuracy and validity of the method employed and names of persons
performing the analyses and their experience;
.7 statements by witnesses;
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
Signature
APPENDIX 17
...................................................................................................................................................
Did you receive the notification of detention? (tick the box if the answer is "yes")
Action taken
Additional Information:
APPENDIX 18
Chapter 1 GENERAL
1.1 This document is intended to provide basic guidance on the conduct of port State
control inspections for compliance with MARPOL Annex VI (hereinafter referred to as
"the Annex") and afford consistency in the conduct of these inspections, the recognition of
deficiencies and the application of control procedures.
2.1.1 The port State control officer (PSCO) should ascertain the date of ship construction
and the date of installation of equipment on board which are subject to the provisions of the
Annex, in order to confirm which regulations of the Annex are applicable.
2.1.2 On boarding and introduction to the master or responsible ship's officer, the PSCO
should examine the following documents, where applicable:
.3 the Technical File (paragraph 2.3.4 of the NOX Technical Code) for each
applicable marine diesel engine;
.4 depending on the method used for demonstrating NOX compliance for each
applicable marine diesel engine:
.5 for a ship to which regulation VI/13.5.1 applies for a particular NOX Tier III
emission control area and that has one or more installed marine diesel engines
certified to both Tier II and Tier III or which has one or more marine diesel
engines certified to Tier II only* that there are the required log-book and the
recordings for the tier and on/off status of those marine diesel engines while
the ship is within an applicable NOX Tier III emission control area;
.7 the written procedures covering fuel oil change over operations (in a working
language or languages understood by the crew) where separate fuel oils are
used in order to achieve compliance (regulation VI/14.6);
.9 the approved documentation (SECC where issued, ETM, OMM, SECP) and
relating to any installed Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (EGCS) or equivalent
means, to reduce SOX emissions (regulation VI/4);
.10 that the required EGCS monitoring records have been retained and show
compliance. Additionally, that the EGCS Record Book including nitrate
discharge data and performance records,† or approved alternative, has been
duly maintained;
.11 the bunker delivery notes (BDNs) and representative samples or records
thereof (regulation VI/18);
.12 the copy of the type approval certificate of applicable shipboard incinerator
(resolutions MEPC.76(40) or MEPC.244(66));
.15 any notification to the ship's flag Administration issued by the master or
officer in charge of the bunker operation together with any available
commercial documentation relevant to non-compliant bunker delivery,
regulation VI/18.2; and
.16 if the ship has not been able to obtain compliant fuel oil, the notification to
the shipʹs flag Administration and the competent authority of the relevant port
of destination as set out in the appendix.
The Record Books referenced in sub-paragraphs .1, .5, .10 and 13 above may be presented
in an electronic format. A declaration from the Administration should be viewed in order to
accept this Electronic Record Book. If a declaration cannot be provided, a hard copy Record
Book will need to be presented for examination.
2.1.3 As a preliminary check, the IAPP Certificate's validity should be confirmed by verifying
that the Certificate is properly completed and signed and that required surveys have been
performed.
2.1.4 Through examining the Supplement to the IAPP Certificate, the PSCO may establish
how the ship is equipped for the prevention of air pollution.
2.1.5 In the case where the bunker delivery note or the representative sample as required
by regulation VI/18 presented to the ship are not in compliance with the relevant requirements
(the BDN is set out in appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI), the master or officer in charge of the
bunker operation may have documented that through a Notification to the shipʹs flag
Administration with copies to the port authority under whose jurisdiction the ship did not receive
the required documentation pursuant to the bunkering operation and to the bunker deliverer.
2.1.6 In addition, if the BDN shows compliant fuel, but the master has independent test
results of the fuel oil sample taken by the ship during the bunkering which indicates
non-compliance, the master may have documented that through a Notification to the shipʹs flag
Administration with copies to the competent authority of the relevant port of destination, the
Administration under whose jurisdiction the bunker deliverer is located and to the bunker
deliverer.
2.1.7 In all cases, a copy may be retained on board the ship, together with any available
commercial documentation, for the subsequent scrutiny of port State control.
2.2 Initial inspection on ships equipped with equivalent means of SOX compliance.
2.2.1 On ships equipped with equivalent means of compliance, the PSCO will look at:
.1 evidence that the ship has received an appropriate approval for any installed
equivalent means (approved, under trial or being commissioned);
.3 BDNs on board* which indicate that the fuel oil is intended to be used in
combination with an equivalent means of SOX compliance or the ship is
subject to a relevant exemption to conduct trials for SOX emission reduction
and control technology research.
2.2.2 In the case where an EGCS is not in compliance with the relevant requirements for
other than transitory periods and isolated spikes in the recorded output, the master or officer
in charge may have documented that through a Notification to the ship's flag Administration
with copies to the competent authority of the relevant port of destination, and present those
corrective actions taken in order to rectify the situation in accordance with the guidance given
in the EGCS Technical Manual. If a malfunction occurs in the instrumentation for the monitoring
of emission to air or the monitoring of washwater discharge to sea, the ship may have
alternative documentation demonstrating compliance.†
* Resolution MEPC.305(73) on the Prohibition on the carriage of non-compliant fuel oil for combustion
purposes for propulsion or operation on board a ship is not applicable to fuel oil carried as cargo or for ships
fitted with an approved equivalent means of compliance.
† MEPC.1/Circ.883 on Guidance on indication of ongoing compliance in the case of the failure of a single
monitoring instrument, and recommended actions to take if the Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (EGCS) fails
to meet the provisions of the 2015 EGCS Guidelines (resolution MEPC.259(68)), ships should have
documented notification of system non-compliance to relevant authorities as in paragraph 2.2.2.
2.3.1 When a ship is inspected in a port in an ECA designated for SOX emission control,
the PSCO should look at:
.1 evidence of fuel oil delivered to and used on board with a sulphur content of
not more than 0.10% m/m through the BDNs and appropriate onboard
records including records of bunkering operations as set out in the Oil Record
Book Part 1 (regulation VI/18.5 and VI/14.4); and
.2 for those ships using separate fuel oils for compliance with regulation VI/14,
evidence of a written procedure (in a working language or languages
understood by the crew) and records of changeover to fuel oil with a sulphur
content of not more than 0.10% m/m before entering the ECA such that
compliant fuel was being used while sailing in the entire ECA as required in
regulation VI/14.6.
2.3.2 When a ship to which regulation VI/13.5.1 applies for a particular NOX Tier III emission
control area is inspected in a port in that area, the PSCO should look at:
.1 the records in respect of the tier and on/off status, together with any changes
to that status while within that NOX Tier III emission control area, which are
to be logged as required by regulation VI/13.5.3 in respect of an installed
marine diesel engine certified to both Tier II and Tier III or which is certified
to Tier II only*; and
.2 the status of an installed marine diesel engine which is certified to both Tier II
and Tier III showing that that engine was operating in its Tier III condition on
entry into that NOX Tier III emission control area and that status was
maintained at all times while that marine diesel engine was in operation
within that area; or
2.4 Initial inspection outside an ECA or first port after transiting an ECA
2.4.1 When a ship is inspected in a port outside ECA the PSCO will look to the same
documentation and evidence as during inspections in ports inside the ECA. The PSCO should
in particular look at:
.1 evidence that the sulphur content of the fuel oil is in accordance with
regulation VI/14.1 † through the BDNs and appropriate onboard records
including records of bunkering operations as set out in the Oil Record Book
Part 1 (regulation VI/18.5 and VI/14.4); and
2.4.2 When a ship to which regulation VI/13.5.1 applies for a particular NOX Tier III emission
control area is inspected in a port outside that area, the PSCO should look at the records
required by 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.2.2 or 2.3.2.3 to ensure that the relevant requirements were
complied with for the whole period of time the ship was operating in that area.
2.5.1 If the certificates and documents are valid and appropriate and, after an inspection of
the ship to check that the overall condition of the ship meets generally accepted international
rules and standards, the PSCO's general impressions and observations on board confirm a
good standard of maintenance, the inspection should be considered satisfactorily concluded.
2.5.2 If, however, the PSCO's general impressions or observations on board give clear
grounds (see paragraph 2.5.3) for believing that the condition of the ship or its equipment do
not correspond substantially with the particulars of the certificates or the documents, the PSCO
should proceed to a more detailed inspection.
.1 evidence that certificates required by the Annex are missing or clearly invalid;
.6 information or evidence that the master or crew are not familiar with essential
shipboard operations relating to the prevention of air pollution, or that such
operations have not been carried out;
.10 receipt of a report or complaint containing information that the ship appears
to be non-compliant including but not limited to information from remote
sensing surveillance of SOX emissions or portable fuel oil sulphur content
measurement devices indicating that a ship appears to use non-compliant
fuel while in operation/underway;
.11 evidence that the tier and/or on/off status of applicable installed marine diesel
engines has not been maintained correctly or as required;
.12 receipt of a report or complaint containing information that one or more of the
installed marine diesel engines has not been operated in accordance with
the provisions of the respective Technical File or the requirements relevant
to a particular NOX Tier III emission control area; and
2.6.2 In order to verify that each installed marine diesel engine with a power output of more
than 130 kW is approved by the Administration in accordance with the NOX Technical Code
and maintained appropriately, the PSCO should pay particular attention to the following:
.2 examine marine diesel engines specified in the Technical Files to verify that
no unapproved modifications, which may affect NOX emission, have been
made to the marine diesel engines;
.3 in the case of an installed marine diesel engine certified to Tier III that the
required records, if applicable, in accordance with regulation VI/13.5.3 or in
the Technical File, including those required by 2.3.6 of the NOX Technical
Code, have been maintained as necessary and that the marine diesel
engine, including any NOX control device and associated ancillary systems
and equipment, including, where fitted, bypass arrangements, is maintained
in accordance with the associated Technical File and is in good order;
.5 examine marine diesel engines with a power output of more than 5,000 kW
and a per cylinder displacement at or above 90 litres installed on a ship
constructed on or after 1 January 1990 but prior to 1 January 2000 to verify
that they are certified, if so required, in accordance with regulation VI/13.7;
.6 in the case of ships constructed before 1 January 2000, verify that any
marine diesel engine which has been subject to a major conversion, as
defined in regulation VI/13, has been approved by the Administration; and
2.6.3 The PSCO should check and verify whether fuel oil complies with the provisions of
regulation VI/14 taking into account appendix VI* of this Annex.
2.6.4 The PSCO should pay attention to the record required in regulation VI/14.6 in order
to identify the sulphur content of fuel oil used by the ship depending on the area of trade, or
that other equivalent approved means have been applied as required. The fuel oil consumed
in and outside the ECA, and that there is enough fuel in compliance with regulation VI/14 to
reach the next port destination.
2.6.5 Where EGCS is used, the PSCO should check that it has been installed and operated,
together with its monitoring systems, in accordance with the associated approved
documentation according to the survey procedures as established in the OMM.
2.6.6 If the ship is equipped with an EGCS as an equivalent means of SOX compliance, the
PSCO should verify that the system is properly functioning, is in operation, there are
continuous-monitoring systems with tamper-proof data recording and processing devices,† if
applicable and the records demonstrate the necessary compliance when set against the limits
given in the approved documentation and applies to relevant fuel combustion units on board.
Checking can include but is not limited to: emissions ratio, pH, PAH, turbidity readings as limit
values given in ETM-A or ETM-B and operation parameters as listed in the system
documentation.
2.6.7 If the ship is a tanker, as defined in regulation VI/2.21, the PSCO should verify that
the vapour collection system approved by the Administration, taking into account
MSC/Circ.585, is installed, if required under regulation VI/15.
2.6.8 If the ship is a tanker carrying crude oil, the PSCO should verify that there is on board
an approved VOC Management Plan.
2.6.9 The PSCO should verify that prohibited materials are not incinerated.
2.6.10 The PSCO should verify that shipboard incineration of sewage sludge or sludge oil in
boilers or marine power plants is not undertaken while the ship is inside ports, harbours or
estuaries (regulation VI/16.4).
2.6.11 The PSCO should verify that the shipboard incinerator, if required by
regulation VI/16.6.1, is approved by the Administration. For these units, it should be verified
that the incinerator is properly maintained, therefore the PSCO should examine whether:
* Amendments to MARPOL VI, Appendix VI, Verification procedures for a MARPOL Annex VI fuel oil sample
(regulation 18.8.2 or regulation 14.8), expected to be adopted in Spring 2020 and set out in annex 13 to
document MEPC 74/18/Add.1.
† Equivalent emission values for emission abatement methods are 4.3 and 21.7 SO2 (ppm)/CO2 (% v/v) for
marine fuels with a sulphur content of 0.10 and 0.50 (% m/m) respectively.
.3 the combustion chamber flue gas outlet temperature is monitored at all times
the unit is in operation (regulation VI/16.9).
2.6.12 If there are clear grounds as defined in paragraph 2.5.3, the PSCO may examine
operational procedures by confirming that:
.1 the master or crew are familiar with the procedures to prevent emissions of
ozone-depleting substances;
.2 the master or crew are familiar with the proper operation and maintenance
of marine diesel engines, in accordance with their Technical Files or
Approved Method file, as applicable, and with due regard for Emission
Control Areas for NOX control;
.3 the master or crew are familiar with fuel oil bunkering procedures in
connection to the respective bunker delivery notes and onboard records
including the Oil Record Book Part 1 (regulation VI/18.5 and VI/14.4) and
retained samples as required by regulation VI/18;
.4 the master or crew are familiar with the correct operation of an EGCS or other
equivalent means on board together with any applicable monitoring and
recording, and record keeping requirements;
.5 the master or crew are familiar and have undertaken the necessary fuel oil
changeover procedures, or equivalent, associated with demonstrating
compliance within an Emission Control Area;
.6 the master or crew are familiar with the garbage screening procedure to
ensure that prohibited garbage is not incinerated;
.7 the master or crew are familiar with the operation of the shipboard
incinerator, as required by regulation VI/16.6, within the limits provided in
appendix IV to the Annex, in accordance with its operational manual;
.8 the master or crew are familiar with the regulation of emissions of VOCs,
when the ship is in ports or terminals under the jurisdiction of a Party to
the 1997 Protocol to MARPOL 73/78 in which VOCs emissions are to be
regulated, and are familiar with the proper operation of a vapour collection
system approved by the Administration (in case the ship is a tanker as
defined in regulation VI/2.21); and
.9 the master or crew are familiar with the application of the VOC Management
Plan, if applicable.
2.7.1 In exercising his/her functions, the PSCO should use professional judgment to
determine whether to detain the ship until any noted deficiencies are corrected or to allow it to
sail with certain deficiencies which do not pose an unreasonable threat of harm under the
scope of the Annex provided they will be timely addressed. In doing this, the PSCO should be
guided by the principle that the requirements contained in the Annex, with respect to the
construction, equipment and operation of the ship, are essential for the protection of the marine
environment, the navigational safety or the human health and that departure from these
requirements could constitute an unreasonable threat of harm to the mentioned protection
aspects and should be avoided.
2.7.2 In order to assist the PSCO in the use of these Guidelines, there follows a list of
deficiencies, which are considered, taking into account the provisions of regulation VI/3, to be
of such a serious nature that they may warrant the detention of the ship involved:
.2 a marine diesel engine, with a power output of more than 130 kW, which is
installed on board a ship constructed on or after 1 January 2000, or a marine
diesel engine having undergone a major conversion on or
after 1 January 2000, which does not conform to its Technical File, or where
the required records have not been maintained as necessary or where it has
not met the applicable requirements of the particular NOX Tier III emission
control area in which it is operating;
.3 a marine diesel engine, with a power output of more than 5,000 kW and a
per cylinder displacement at or above 90 litres, which is installed on board a
ship constructed on or after 1 January 1990 but prior to 1 January 2000, and
an approved method for that engine has been certified by an Administration
and was commercially available, for which an approved method is not
installed after the first renewal survey specified in regulation VI/13.7.2;
* Amendments to MARPOL VI, appendix VI, Verification procedures for a MARPOL Annex VI fuel oil sample
(regulation 18.8.2 or regulation 14.8), expected to be adopted in Spring 2020 and set out in annex13 to
document MEPC 74/18/Add.1.
.8 the master or crew are not familiar with essential procedures regarding the
operation of air pollution prevention equipment as defined in
paragraph 2.5.12 above.
3.1 As this category of ships is not provided with the IAPP Certificate, the PSCO should
judge whether the condition of the ship and its equipment satisfies the requirements set out in
the Annex. In this respect, the PSCO should take into account that, in accordance with
article 5(4) of MARPOL, no more favourable treatment is to be given to ships of non-Parties.
3.2 In all other respects the PSCO should be guided by the procedures for ships referred
to in chapter 2 and should be satisfied that the ship and crew do not present a danger to those
on board or an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment.
3.3 If the ship has a form of certification other than the IAPP Certificate, the PSCO may
take such documentation into account in the evaluation of the ship.
APPENDIX
In case non-availability of compliant fuel oil is claimed the master/owner must present a record
of actions taken to attempt to bunker compliant fuel oil and provide evidence:
.1 of attempts to purchase compliant fuel oil in accordance with its voyage plan;
.2 if the fuel oil was not made available where expected, that attempts were
made to locate alternative sources for such fuel oil; and
.3 that despite best efforts to obtain compliant fuel oil no such fuel oil was made
available for purchase.
Best efforts to procure compliant fuel oil include, but are not limited to, investigating alternative
sources of fuel oil prior to commencing the voyage or en route.
The ship should not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to unduly delay the
voyage in order to achieve compliance.
If the ship provides the information, as above, the port State should take into account all
relevant circumstances and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate action to
take, including not taking control measures.
The master/owner may provide evidence as below to support their claim (not exhaustive):
.1 a copy (or description) of the ship's voyage plan, including the ship's port of
origin and port of destination;
.2 the time the ship first received notice it would be conducting a voyage
involving transit/arrival in the port and the ship's location when it first received
such notice;
.4 the cost of compliant fuel is not considered to be a valid basis for claiming
non-availability of fuel;
.5 include names and addresses of the fuel oil suppliers contacted and the
dates on which contact was made;
.6 in cases of fuel oil supply disruption, the name of the port at which the ship
was scheduled to receive compliant fuel oil and the name of the fuel supplier
that is reporting the non-availability of compliant fuel oil;
.7 the availability of compliant fuel oil at the next port-of-call and plans to obtain
that fuel oil; and
If, despite best efforts, it was not possible to procure compliant fuel oil the master/owner must
notify the port State control authorities in the port of arrival and the flag Administration
(regulation VI/18.2.4).
APPENDIX 19
LIST OF INSTRUMENTS RELEVANT TO PORT STATE CONTROL PROCEDURES
MEPC.208(62) 2011 Guidelines for inspection of anti-fouling systems on ships III 15 July 2011
Ballast Water
MEPC.173(58) Guidelines for ballast water sampling (G2) MEPC/PPR To be read in 10 October
conjunction with 2008
resolution
MEPC.252(67)) and
resolution
BWM.2/Circ.42/Rev.1
MEPC.252(67) Guidelines for port State control under the 2004 BWM Convention MEPC/III To be read in 17 October
conjunction with 2014
resolution
MEPC.173(58) and
resolution
BWM.2/Circ.42/Rev.1
MEPC.279(70) 2016 Guidelines for approval of ballast water management MEPC
systems (G8)
MEPC.297(72) Amendments to regulation B-3 (Implementation schedule of ballast MEPC 2018
water management for ships)
BWM.2/Circ.42/Rev.1 Guidance on ballast water sampling and analysis for trial use in MEPC/PPR To be read in 28 May 2015
accordance with the BWM Convention and Guidelines (G2) conjunction with
resolution
MEPC.252(67) and
resolution
MEPC.173(58)
A.862(20) Code of practice for safe loading and unloading of bulk carriers CCC as amended by 27 Nov 1997
MSC.238(82) and
MSC.304(87)
MSC/Circ.656 Safety of ships carrying solid bulk cargoes CCC 6 June 1994
MSC/Circ.1117 Guidance for checking the structure of bulk carriers SSE 24 June 2004
MSC.1/Circ.1464/Rev.1 Unified interpretations of the provisions of SOLAS 1974, Chapters SSE As amended by 24 October
II-1 and XII, of the Technical provisions for means of access for MSC.1/Circ.1507 2013
inspections (resolution MSC.158(78)) and of the Performance
standards for water level detectors on bulk carriers and single hold
cargo ships other than bulk carriers (resolution MSC.188(79))
MSC.1/Circ.1464/Rev.1/Corr.1 Unified interpretations of the provisions of SOLAS 1974, Chapters SSE 14 November
II-1 and XII, of the Technical provisions for means of access for 2013
inspections (resolution MSC.158(78)) and of the Performance
standards for water level detectors on bulk carriers and single hold
cargo ships other than bulk carriers (resolution MSC.188(79))
MSC.1/Circ.1507 Amendments to the Unified interpretations of the provisions of SSE 5 June 2015
SOLAS 1974, Chapters II-1 and XII, of the Technical provisions for
means of access for inspections (resolution MSC.158(78)) and of
the Performance standards for water level detectors on bulk
carriers and single hold cargo ships other than bulk carriers
(resolution MSC.188(79)) (MSC.1/Circ.1464/Rev.1)
MSC.1/Circ.1464/Rev.1/Corr.2 Unified interpretations of the provisions of SOLAS chapters II-1 SSE 9 June 2017
and XII, of the Technical provisions for means of access for
inspections (resolution MSC.158(78)) and of the Performance
standards for water level detectors on bulk carriers and single hold
cargo ships other than bulk carriers (resolution MSC.188(79))
Certificates
MSC/Circ.1586 List of certificates and documents required to be carried on board III 19 July 2017
MEPC/Circ.873 ships, 2017
FAL.2/Circ.131
LEG.2/Circ.3
MSC.1/Circ.1586/Corr.1 List of certificates and documents required to be carried on board III 4 June 2018
MEPC.1/Circ.873/Corr.1 ships, 2017
FAL.2/Circ.131/Corr.1
LEG.2/Circ.3/Corr.1
MSC-MEPC.4/Circ.1 Retention of original records/documents on board ships III 26 September
2005
MSC-MEPC.5/Circ.6 Guidance on the timing of replacement of existing certificates by the III 6 August 2009
certificates issued after the entry into force of amendments to
certificates in IMO instruments
MARPOL
MEPC.259(68) 2015 Guidelines for exhaust gas cleaning systems MEPC/PPR Read in conjunction 15 May 2015
with document MEPC
68/21/Add.1/Corr.2
MSC.286(86) Recommendations for material safety data sheets (MSDS) for PPR 5 June 2009
MARPOL Annex I
MEPC.312(74) Guidelines for the use of Electronic Record Books under MARPOL MEPC 17 May 2019
MEPC.320(74) 2019 Guidelines for Consistent implementation of the 0.50% MEPC 17 May 2019
sulphur limit under MARPOL Annex VI
MEPC.321(74) 2019 Guidelines for port State control under MARPOL Annex VI MEPC 17 May 2019
Chapter 3
MSC.465(101) Recommended interim measures to enhance the safety of ships MSC 14 June 2019
relating to the use of oil fuel
MEPC/Circ.479 Guidelines for port State control officers whilst checking compliance MEPC/III 24 August 2005
with the condition assessment scheme (CAS)
MEPC.1/Circ.479 and Corr.1 Guidelines for port State control officers whilst checking compliance MEPC/III 6 October 2005
with the Condition Assessment Scheme (CAS)
MEPC.1/Circ.508 Bunker delivery note and fuel oil sampling MEPC/III 9 May 2006
MEPC.1/Circ.516 Public access to the condition assessment scheme (CAS) database MEPC 5 May 2006
MEPC.1/Circ.675/Rev.1 Discharge of cargo hold washing water in the Gulfs area and MEPC 26 March 2010
Mediterranean Sea area under MARPOL Annex V
MEPC.1/Circ.834/Rev.1 Consolidated guidance for port reception facility providers and MEPC 15 April 2014
users
MEPC.1/Circ.864/Rev.1 2019 Guidelines for on board sampling for the verification of the MEPC 17 May 2019
sulphur content of the fuel oil used on board ships
MEPC.1/Circ.881 Guidance for port State control on contingency measures for MEPC 17 May 2019
addressing non-compliant fuel oil
MEPC.1/Circ.882 Early application of the approved amendments to the verification MEPC 17 May 2019
procedures for a MARPOL Annex VI fuel oil sample
MEPC.1/Circ.883 Guidance on indication of ongoing compliance in the case of the MEPC 17 May 2019
failure of a single monitoring instrument, and recommended
actions to take if the EGCS fails to meet the provision of the 2015
EGCS Guidelines (resolution MEPC.259(68))
MSC-MEPC.4/Circ.3 Blanking of bilge discharge piping systems in port MSC/MEPC 19 December
2008
PSC activities
MSC.1/Circ.1191 Further reminder of the obligation to notify flag States when MSC/III 30 May 2006
exercising control and compliance measures
MSC.1/Circ.1199 Interim guidance on compliance of ships carrying dry cargoes in SSE 31 May 2006
bulk with requirements of SOLAS chapters II-1, III, IX, XI-1 and XII
MSC.1/Circ.1221 Validity of type approval certification for marine products III 11 Dec. 2006
MSC/Circ.1011, Measures to improve port State control procedures III 26 June 2001
MEPC/Circ.383
MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.2 IMO requirements on carriage of publication on board ships III/NCSR 1 June 2006
MSC-MEPC.4/Circ.2 Code of good practice for port State control officers MSC/MEPC 1 Nov. 2007
Security
MSC.159(78) Interim guidance on control and compliance measures to enhance MSC/III 21 May 2004
maritime security
MSC/Circ.1097 Guidance relating to the implementation of SOLAS chapter XI-2 and MSC 6 June 2003
the ISPS Code
MSC/Circ.1113 Guidance to port State control officers on the non-security related MSC Automatic 7 June 2004
elements of the 2002 SOLAS amendment Identification
Systems (AIS) and
ship's identification
number, and,
Continuous Synopsis
Record (CSR)
Read in conjunction
with Res. A.959(23),
adopted 5 Dec.2003,
Format and
guidelines for the
maintenance of the
CSR,
as amended by Res.
MSC.198(80),
adopted 20 May 2005
MSC/Circ.1156 Guidance on the access of public authorities, emergency response MSC Read in conjunction 23 May 2005
services and pilots on board ships to which SOLAS chapter XI-2 with MSC.1/Circ.1342
and the ISPS Code apply of
27 May 2010
Reminder in
connection with shore
leave and access to
ships (and
MSC.1/Circ.1194 of
30 May 2006)
MSC.1/Circ.1235 Guidelines on security-related training and familiarization for HTW 21 Oct. 2007
shipboard personnel
MSC.1/Circ.1342 Reminder in connection with shore leave and access to ships MSC 27 May 2010
SOLAS
A.1047(27) Principles of minimum safe manning MSC/HTW 30 Nov. 2011
MSC/Circ.887 Interpretation of the term "other strategic points" in SOLAS SSE 21 Dec. 1998
regulation III/50 and LSA Code section VII/7.2
MSC/Circ.907 Application of SOLAS regulation III/28.2 concerning helicopter SSE 17 June 1999
landing areas on non ro-ro passenger ships
MSC/Circ.1016 Application of SOLAS regulation III/26 concerning fast rescue boats SSE Complemented by 26 June 2001
and means of rescue systems on ro-ro passenger ships MSC/Circ.1094 - 17
June 2003
Application of SOLAS
III/26 concerning
fast rescue boat
systems on ro-ro
passenger ships
MSC/Circ.1107 Application of SOLAS regulation II-1/3-6 on access to and within CCC 25 May 2004
spaces in, and forward of, the cargo area of oil tankers and bulk
carriers and application of the technical provisions for means of
access for inspections
MSC.1/Circ.1326 Clarification of SOLAS regulation III/19 SSE SOLAS 2013 Amend 11 June 2009
/ Chapter III / 19.3.4.3
instead of SOLAS
2006 Amend /
Chapter III /19.3.3.3
MSC.1/Circ.1326/Corr.1 Clarification of SOLAS regulation III/19 SSE 13 Aug. 2009
Corrigendum
MSC.1/Circ.1331 Guidelines for construction, installation, maintenance and SSE 11 June 2009
inspection/survey of means of embarkation and disembarkation
STCW
STCW.7/Circ. 22 Advice for port State control officers, recognized organizations and MSC/HTW 25 February
recognized security organizations clarifying training and certification 2014
requirements for ship security officers and seafarers with
designated security duties
STCW.7/Circ.24/Rev.1 Guidance for Parties, Administrations, port State control authorities, III/HTW 16 June 2017
recognized organizations and other relevant parties on the
requirements under the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended
MSC/Circ.635 Tonnage measurement of certain ships relevant to the International SDC 15 June 1994
Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978
MSC/Circ.1089 Guidance on recommended anti-fraud measures and forgery III/HTW 6 June 2003
prevention measures for seafarers' certificate
MSC.1/Circ.1208 Promoting and verifying continued familiarization of GMDSS HTW 22 May 2006
operators on board ships
***
ANNEX 6
THE ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING ALSO that one of the goals of the Organization is to ensure the consistent and
effective implementation of IMO instruments globally and compliance with their requirements,
RECOGNIZING ALSO the findings identified in audits under the IMO Member State Audit
Scheme (IMSAS) related to a shortfall in the communication of information as required under
the IMO instruments and the IMO Instruments Implementation Code (resolution A.1070(28)),
which have highlighted the difficulties faced by the audited Member States in the
implementation and enforcement of the mandatory IMO instruments to which they are Parties,
RECOGNIZING FURTHER the need for guidance to facilitate compliance by Member States
with the communication of information requirements under various IMO instruments and to
assist them in fulfilling their reporting obligations more effectively,
2 INVITES Member States concerned to take into account the annexed Guidance when
fulfilling their obligation in communicating information to all concerned parties;
3 REQUESTS the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment Protection
Committee to keep the Guidance on Communication of Information by Member States under
review for further improvement, as may be necessary.
ANNEX
1 Purpose
The purpose of this Guidance is to facilitate compliance by Member States with the
communication of information requirements under various IMO instruments and to assist them
in fulfilling their reporting obligations more effectively.
2 Application
This Guidance applies to all parties that are involved in the communication of information by
Member States to all concerned. The concerned parties include, but are not limited to, IMO,
other Member States and other related international organizations and institutions.
4 Objectives
5 Plan
5.1 Member States are recommended to establish a reporting system by identifying the
obligations for communication of information under IMO instruments and assigning related
responsibilities among relevant entities participating in the implementation and enforcement of
the applicable IMO instruments.
.3 frequency of reporting;
6 Do
Who
6.2 Each Member State should designate a GISIS Administrator, in accordance with
Circular Letter No.2892 on Access to IMO web services, including GISIS and IMODOCS, who
should be responsible for creating and maintaining all user accounts for the Member State.
How
6.3 The communication of information can be done in the following four ways:
Each Member State could fulfil its reporting obligation by forwarding the
required information through a letter, with a request to inform other Member
States, as appropriate;
What
When
6.6 During the planning of the communication of information, the reporting time and
frequency should be given due attention and the following factors may be considered:
.2 for information such as the change of contact points or the outcomes of hook
evaluation regarding lifeboat release and retrieval system, the communication should be made
through GISIS as and when the changes take place; and
7 Check
7.1 Each Member State should establish a mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of
its communication of information. If the performance in reporting does not reach the anticipated
goals, the Member State should analyze root causes and take corrective measures, including
seeking technical assistance from IMO, if necessary. The verification mechanism may include
internal and external checks.
7.2 In the context of an internal check, Member States should carry out a self-evaluation
to determine whether remedial measures need to be taken to enhance implementation
capabilities. Internal checks may include, but are not limited to:
7.3 Member States may ascertain the shortcomings and potential improvements in
communication through external checks, which may include, but are not limited to:
8 Act
8.1 Member States should develop a corrective action plan to correct any shortcomings
and implement improvements in reporting.
8.2 The corrective action plan may include, but is not limited to, the following:
***
ANNEX 11
THE ASSEMBLY,
(d) the International Conference on Ballast Water Management for Ships of the
International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast
Water and Sediments, 2004, which included the harmonized system of
survey and certification; and
(i) the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships
Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (IBC Code) (resolutions
MEPC.40(29) and MSC.16(58));
(ii) the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships
Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code) (resolution
MSC.17(58)); and
(iii) the Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying
Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (BCH Code) (resolutions MEPC.41(29)
and MSC.18(58)),
A.1076(28), A.1020(26), A.997(25), A.948(23) and A.746(18), replacing the guidelines adopted
by resolutions A.560(14), MEPC.11(18) and MEPC.25(23),
RECOGNIZING the need for the Survey Guidelines to be further revised to take into account
the amendments to the IMO instruments referred to above which have entered into force or
become effective since the adoption of resolution A.1120(30),
1 ADOPTS the Survey Guidelines under the Harmonized System of Survey and
Certification (HSSC), 2019, as set out in the annex to the present resolution;
3 REQUESTS the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment Protection
Committee to keep the Survey Guidelines under review and to amend them as necessary;
ANNEX
(These Guidelines take into account relevant IMO mandatory instruments and
amendments thereto entering into force up to and including 31 December 2019)
Table of contents
GENERAL
1 INTRODUCTION
2 TYPES OF SURVEY
Annex 1
(E) 1 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE CARGO SHIP SAFETY EQUIPMENT
CERTIFICATE
(C) 2 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE CARGO SHIP SAFETY CONSTRUCTION
CERTIFICATE
(B) 3 GUIDELINES FOR THE INSPECTION OF THE OUTSIDE OF THE SHIP'S BOTTOM OF
CARGO SHIPS
(R) 4 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE CARGO SHIP SAFETY RADIO
CERTIFICATE
(P) 5 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE PASSENGER SHIP SAFETY CERTIFICATE
Annex 2
(L) 1 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LOAD LINE CERTIFICATE
OR INTERNATIONAL LOAD LINE EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE
Annex 3
Annex 4
Annex 5
(W) 3 GUIDELINES FOR THE SURVEYS FOR THE POLAR SHIP CERTIFICATE
ADDITIONAL TO SOLAS CERTIFICATES
GENERAL
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 These Guidelines supersede the guidelines adopted by resolution A.1120(30), and
take account of the Harmonized System of Survey and Certification in the following
instruments:
.1 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (1974 SOLAS
Convention, or SOLAS 74), as modified by the Protocol of 1988 relating
thereto, as amended (SOLAS 74/88);
1.2 These Guidelines take into account the amendments to statutory instruments which
entered into force before or on 31 December 2019 (see appendix 1), and contain the following:
.4 Survey Guidelines under the International Convention for the Control and
Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments, 2004 (annex 4); and
.3 a maximum period of validity of five years for all cargo ship certificates;
.6 when an extension has been granted, the period of validity of the new
certificate starting from the expiry date of the existing certificate before its
extension;
.7 a flexible system for inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom on the
following conditions:
1.4 In implementing the harmonized system, the following principal changes made to the
survey and certification requirements of SOLAS 74/88 have been taken into account:
.3 intermediate surveys are required for all ships under the Cargo Ship Safety
Construction Certificate;
.4 inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom is required for all cargo ships;
.5 intermediate surveys for the Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate are
held within three months of either the second or third anniversary date;
.6 all cargo ship certificates may be issued for any period of validity up to and
including five years;
.8 the extension provisions have been reduced from five months to three
months to enable a ship to complete its voyage and the extension for one
month for a period of grace is limited to ships engaged on short voyages.
1.5 With regard to LLC 66/88, the principal changes to the requirements for survey and
certification are the introduction of similar extension provisions (see 1.4.8) and linking of the
period of validity of the new certificate to the expiry date of the previous certificate (see 1.3.6).
1.6 With regard to MARPOL and the IBC, IGC and BCH Codes, the main changes are
the linking of the period of validity of the new certificate to the expiry date of the previous
certificate (see 1.3.6), the holding of the intermediate survey within three months of the second
or third anniversary date and the introduction of the same extension provisions (see 1.4.8).
2 TYPES OF SURVEY
(I) 2.1 An initial survey is a complete inspection before a ship is put into service of
all the items relating to a particular certificate, to ensure that the relevant
requirements are complied with and that these items are satisfactory for the
service for which the ship is intended.
(P) 2.2 A periodical survey is an inspection of the items relating to the particular
certificate to ensure that they are in a satisfactory condition and fit for the
service for which the ship is intended.
(R) 2.3 A renewal survey is the same as a periodical survey but also leads to the
issue of a new certificate.
(A) 2.5 An annual survey is a general inspection of the items relating to the particular
certificate to ensure that they have been maintained and remain satisfactory
for the service for which the ship is intended.
(B) 2.6 An inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom is an inspection of the
underwater part of the ship and related items to ensure that they are in a
satisfactory condition and fit for the service for which the ship is intended.
(Ad) 2.7 An additional survey is an inspection, either general or partial according to
the circumstances, to be made after:
3.1 The Guidelines provide a general framework upon which Administrations will be able
to base their arrangements for carrying out surveys. It is recognized that survey provisions
contained in the guidelines are not necessarily applicable to all types and sizes of ship.
3.2 While the Guidelines are intended to cover instruments listed in 1.1, they should be
applied, as appropriate, to drilling rigs and other platforms covered by MARPOL Annex I
regulation 39 and Annex VI regulation 5.
3.3 A description of the various types of survey is given in section 4 and, as shown on the
contents page, this is followed by the detailed requirements for the various surveys for each of
the certificates.
3.4 When appropriate, the detailed requirements for the various surveys contain a section
that is applicable to all cargo ships followed by a section that only applies to specific ship types.
3.5 While the Convention or Code references are included, where possible, it should be
noted that, in general, it has not been possible to indicate where there are differing
requirements dependent upon the ship's year of build. Consequently, care should be taken in
applying specific requirements, particularly where there have been amendments that are only
applicable to ships built after a certain date.
3.6 Although also part of the requirements for the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate, a separate section is provided for inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom.
3.7 SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/12(v) provides for a Cargo Ship Safety Certificate to be
issued as an alternative to the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety
Construction Certificate and the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate. Consequently, the
surveys for the issue and renewal of the Cargo Ship Safety Certificate should be in accordance
with the certificates it replaces and, similarly, the annual and intermediate surveys should be
the same as those required for the replaced certificates and the appropriate sections of the
Cargo Ship Safety Certificate, endorsed accordingly.
3.8 On the left-hand side of each item to be surveyed may be found two or three letters
in brackets, the first indicating the certificate to which the survey relates, as follows:
(N) for the International Pollution Prevention Certificate for Carriage of Noxious
Liquid Substances in Bulk;
(D) for the International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk or the Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk;
(G) for the International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases
in Bulk;
and the second and third letters the type of survey, as follows:
Consequently, for example, "(EI)", "(OIn)" and "(PR)" indicate the initial survey for the Cargo
Ship Safety Equipment Certificate, the intermediate survey for the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate and the renewal survey for the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate,
respectively.
3.9 For the application of these guidelines, the following guidance on terms used in the
survey requirements is provided:
4.1.1 Frequency
The initial survey, as required by the relevant regulations (see 2.8.1), should be held before
the ship is put in service, or when a new instrument applies to an existing ship, and the
appropriate certificate is issued for the first time.
4.1.2 General
4.1.2.1 The initial survey should include a complete inspection, with tests when necessary, of
the structure, machinery and equipment to ensure that the requirements relevant to the
particular certificate are complied with and that the structure, machinery and equipment are fit
for the service for which the ship is intended.
.3 a check that all the certificates, record books, operating manuals and other
instructions and documentation specified in the requirements relevant to the
particular certificate have been placed on board the ship.
An application for an initial survey should be accompanied by plans and designs referred to in
sections 1, 2, 4 and 5 of annex 1 and in annexes 2, 3 and 4, as appropriate, together with:
4.2.1 Frequency
The annual survey, as required by the relevant regulations (see 2.8.5) and as shown
diagrammatically in appendix 2, should be held within three months before or after each
anniversary date of the certificate.
4.2.2 General
4.2.2.1 An annual survey should enable the Administration to verify that the condition of the
ship, its machinery and equipment is being maintained in accordance with the relevant
requirements.
.4 should any doubt arise as to the maintenance of the condition of the ship or
its equipment, further examination and testing should be conducted as
considered necessary.
4.2.3 Where an annual survey has not been carried out within the due dates, reference
should be made to 5.6.
4.3.1 Frequency
The intermediate survey, as required by the relevant regulations (see 2.8.4) and as shown
diagrammatically in appendix 2, should be held within three months before or after the second
anniversary date or within three months before or after the third anniversary date of the
appropriate certificate and should take the place of one of the annual surveys.
4.3.2 General
4.3.2.1 The intermediate survey should be an inspection of items relevant to the particular
certificate to ensure that they are in a satisfactory condition and are fit for the service for which
the ship is intended.
4.3.2.2 When specifying items of hull and machinery for detailed examination, due account
should be taken of any continuous survey schemes that may be applied by classification
societies.
4.3.2.3 Where an intermediate survey has not been carried out within the due dates,
reference should be made to 5.6.
4.4.1 Frequency
The periodical survey, as required by the relevant regulations (see 2.8.2) and as shown
diagrammatically in appendix 2, should be held within three months before or after the second
anniversary date or within three months before or after the third anniversary date in the case
of the cargo ship safety equipment certificate and should take the place of one of the annual
surveys; in the case of the cargo ship safety radio certificate, it should be held within three
months before or after each anniversary date.
4.4.2 General
4.4.2.1 The periodical survey should consist of an inspection, with tests when necessary, of
the equipment to ensure that requirements relevant to the particular certificate are complied
with and that they are in a satisfactory condition and are fit for the service for which the ship is
intended.
4.4.2.2 The periodical survey should also consist of a check that all the certificates, record
books, operating manuals and other instructions and documentation specified in the
requirements relevant to the particular certificate are on board the ship.
4.4.2.3 Where a periodical survey has not been carried out within the due dates, reference
should be made to 5.6.
4.5.1 Frequency
The renewal survey, as required by the relevant regulations (see 2.8.3) and as shown
diagrammatically in the appendix 2, should be held before the appropriate certificate is
renewed.
The cargo ship safety construction renewal survey may be commenced at the fourth annual
survey and may be progressed during the succeeding year with a view to completion by the
fifth anniversary date. The survey items of the fourth annual survey should not be credited to
the completion of the renewal survey.
4.5.2 General
4.5.2 1 The renewal survey should consist of an inspection, with tests when necessary, of the
structure, machinery and equipment to ensure that the requirements relevant to the particular
certificate are complied with and that they are in a satisfactory condition and are fit for the
service for which the ship is intended.
4.5.2.2 The renewal survey should also consist of a check that all the certificates, record
books, operating manuals and other instructions and documentation specified in the
requirements relevant to the particular certificate are on board the ship.
4.5.2.3 Concurrent crediting to both intermediate and renewal safety construction survey for
surveys of spaces should not be acceptable.
(B) 4.6 Inspections of the outside of the ship's bottom of cargo ships
4.6.1 Frequency
There should be a minimum of two inspections of the outside of the ship's bottom during
any five-year period (see 5.7), except where SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(e) or (f) is
applicable. One such inspection should be carried out on or after the fourth annual survey in
conjunction with the renewal of the Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo
Ship Safety Certificate. Where the Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo
Ship Safety Certificate has been extended under SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(e) or (f), this
five-year period may be extended to coincide with the validity of the certificate. In all cases the
interval between any two such inspections should not exceed 36 months.
4.6.2 General
4.6.2.1 The inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom and the survey of related items
(see 5.1) should include an inspection to ensure that they are in a satisfactory condition and fit
for the service for which the ship is intended.*
4.6.2.2 Inspections of the outside of the ship's bottom should normally be carried out with the
ship in a dry dock. However, consideration may be given to alternate inspections being carried out
with the ship afloat. Special consideration should be given before ships of 15 years of age and
over other than bulk carriers and oil tankers are permitted to have such surveys afloat. Inspection
of the outside of the ship's bottom of bulk carriers and oil tankers of 15 years of age and over
* Refer to the Guidelines for pre-planning of surveys in dry dock of ships which are not subject to the enhanced
programme of inspections (MSC.1/Circ.1223).
should be carried out with the ship in dry dock. Inspections with the ship afloat should only be
carried out when the conditions are satisfactory and the proper equipment and suitably trained staff
are available. For ships subject to enhanced survey, the provisions of paragraph 2.2.2* of the
applicable part of annex A or B, of the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of
Inspections during Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (2011 ESP Code) adopted by
resolution A.1049(27), as amended, should apply.
4.6.3 Where an inspection of the ship's bottom has not been carried out before the due
dates reference should be made to 5.6.
(Ad) 4.7 Additional surveys
4.7.1 Frequency
The additional survey, as required by the relevant regulations (see 2.8.7), should be held:
4.7.2 General
Whenever an accident occurs to a ship or a defect is discovered which affects the safety or
integrity of the ship or the efficiency or completeness of its equipment, the master or owner
should make a report at the earliest opportunity to the Administration, the nominated surveyor
or recognized organization responsible for issuing the relevant certificate. The Administration,
the nominated surveyor or recognized organization responsible for issuing the relevant
certificate should then initiate an investigation to determine whether a survey, as required by
the regulations applicable to the particular certificate, is necessary. This additional survey,
which may be general or partial according to the circumstances, should be such as to ensure
that the repairs and any renewals have been effectively made and that the ship and its
equipment continue to be fit for the service for which the ship is intended. In case of
installations of BWMS on existing ships the survey shall be such as to ensure that this retrofit,
replacement, or significant repair has been effectively made, so that the ship complies with the
requirements of the BWM Convention.
* "2.2.2 For ships of 15 years of age and over, inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom should be carried out with the
ship in dry-dock. For ships less than 15 years of age, alternate inspections of the ship's bottom not conducted in
conjunction with the renewal survey may be carried out with the ship afloat. Inspection of the ship afloat should only be
carried out when the conditions are satisfactory and the proper equipment and suitably qualified staff is available."
4.8.1 If a survey shows that the condition of the ship or its equipment does not correspond
substantially with the particulars of the certificate or is not fit to proceed to sea without danger
to the ship, or persons on board, or without presenting unreasonable threat of harm to the
environment, the officer of the Administration, nominated surveyor or recognized organization
should be guided by the requirements of SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/6(c), MARPOL Annex I
regulation 6.3.3, MARPOL Annex II regulation 8.2.5, MARPOL Annex IV regulation 4.5,
MARPOL Annex VI regulation 5.3.3, IBC Code regulation 1.5.1.4, IGC Code regulation 1.4.1.4
and BCH Code regulation 1.6.1.3, or in the case of the BWM Convention the survey shows
that the ship's ballast water management does not conform to the particulars of the Certificate
required under regulations E-2 or E-3, or is such that the ship is not fit to proceed to sea without
presenting a threat of harm to the environment, human health, property or resources, the
surveyor should be guided by regulation E-1.6. These instruments require that corrective
action be taken immediately and the Administration notified in due course. In cases where the
corrective action has not been undertaken the relevant certificate should be withdrawn and the
Administration notified immediately. If the ship is in the port of another Party, the appropriate
authorities of the port State should also be notified immediately.
4.8.2 Although the Polar Code does not contain specific requirements, if the ship is trading in
polar waters, and a survey shows that the condition of the ship or its equipment does not
correspond substantially with the particulars of the Polar Ship Certificate, or the ship is not fit to
operate in polar waters without danger to the ship, or persons on board, or without presenting
unreasonable threat of harm to the environment, the officer of the Administration, nominated
surveyor or recognized organization should, nevertheless, be guided by 4.8.1. The validity of the
Polar Ship Certificate does not affect the validity of other certificates.
4.8.3 Although LLC 66/88 does not contain specific requirements, if a load line survey
shows that the condition of the ship or its equipment does not correspond substantially with
the particulars of the certificate or is not fit to proceed to sea without danger to the ship, or
persons on board, or without presenting unreasonable threat of harm to the environment, the
officer of the Administration, nominated surveyor or recognized organization should,
nevertheless, be guided by 4.8.1.
4.8.4 If a survey shows that the condition of the ship and its equipment correspond
substantially with the particulars of the certificate, and the ship is fit to proceed to sea without
danger to the ship, or persons on board, and without presenting unreasonable threat of harm
to the environment, but deficiencies exist that cannot be rectified at the time of survey, the
following guidance should be given:
5.2 Extending to five years a certificate issued for less than five years
References: SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(c), LLC 66/88 article 19(3), MARPOL Annex I
regulation 10.3, MARPOL Annex II regulation 10.3, MARPOL Annex IV regulation 8.3,
MARPOL Annex VI regulation 9.3, BWM Convention regulations E-5.5 and E-5.6, IBC Code
regulation 1.5.6.3, IGC Code regulation 1.4.6.3, BCH Code regulation 1.6.6.3, and Polar
Code part I-A /regulation 1.3.6.
Where a certificate has been issued for a period of less than five years, it is permissible
under these regulations or article to extend the certificate so that its maximum period of
validity is five years provided that the pattern of surveys for a certificate with a five-year
period of validity is maintained (see appendix 2). This means that, for example, if a request
is made to extend a two-year Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate to five years, then a
periodical and two further annual surveys, as detailed in SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/8, would
be required. Also, for example, if it was intended to extend a four-year Cargo Ship Safety
Construction Certificate to five years, an additional annual survey would be required, as
detailed in SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/10. Where a certificate has been so extended, it is still
permissible to also extend the certificate under SOLAS 74/88 regulations I/14(e) and (f),
LLC 66/88 articles 19(5) and (6), MARPOL Annex I regulations 10.5 and 10.6, MARPOL
Annex II regulations 10.5 and 10.6, MARPOL Annex IV regulations 8.5 and 8.6, MARPOL
Annex VI regulations 9.5 and 9.6, BWM Convention regulation E-5.2.2, IBC Code
regulations 1.5.6.5 and 1.5.6.6, IGC Code regulations 1.4.6.5 and 1.4.6.6, and BCH Code
regulations 1.6.6.5 and 1.6.6.6, when no additional surveys would be required but, of course,
the new certificate issued after the renewal survey would date from the five-year expiry of
the existing certificate, in accordance with SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(b)(ii), LLC 66/88
article 19(2)(b), MARPOL Annex I regulation 10.2.2, MARPOL Annex II regulation 10.2.2,
MARPOL Annex IV regulation 8.2.2, MARPOL Annex VI regulation 9.2.2, BWM Convention
regulation E-5.3, IBC Code regulation 1.5.6.2.2, IGC Code regulation 1.4.6.2.2, BCH Code
regulation 1.6.6.2.2 and Polar Code part I-A/regulation 1.3.6.
5.3 Extending the period between inspections of the outside of the ship's bottom
This permits the period of five years in which two inspections of the ship's bottom are to be
carried out to be extended when the Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate is extended
under regulation I/14(e) and (f). However, no extension should be permitted on the period
of 36 months between any two such inspections. If the first ship's bottom inspection is carried
out between 24 and 27 months, the 36-month limitation may prevent the certificate being
extended by the periods permitted in regulation I/14(e) and (f).
References: SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(f), LLC 66/88 article 19(6), MARPOL Annex I
regulation 10.6, MARPOL Annex II regulation 10.6, MARPOL Annex IV regulation 8.6,
MARPOL Annex VI regulation 9.6, BWM Convention regulation E-5.3, IBC Code
regulation 1.5.6.6, IGC Code regulation 1.4.6.6, BCH Code regulation 1.6.6.6 and Polar Code
part I-A/ regulation 1.3.6.
For the purpose of these regulations or article, a "short voyage" means a voyage where neither
the distance from the port in which the voyage begins to the final port of destination nor the
return voyage exceeds 1,000 miles.
References: SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(g), LLC 66/88 article 19(7), MARPOL Annex I
regulation 10.7, MARPOL Annex II regulation 10.7, MARPOL Annex IV regulation 8.7,
MARPOL Annex VI regulation 9.7, BWM Convention regulation E-5.7, IBC Code
regulation 1.5.6.7, IGC Code regulation 1.4.6.7, BCH Code regulation 1.6.6.7 and Polar Code
part I-A/ regulation 1.3.6.
References: SOLAS 74/88 regulation I/14(i)(i), LLC 66/88 article 19(9)(c), MARPOL Annex I
regulation 10.9.1, MARPOL Annex II regulation 10.9.1, MARPOL Annex IV regulation 8.8.1,
MARPOL Annex VI regulation 9.9.1, BWM Convention E-5.9.3, IBC Code regulation 1.5.6.9.1,
IGC Code regulation 1.4.6.9.1, BCH Code regulation 1.6.6.9.1 and Polar Code
part I-A/regulation 1.3.6.
Any five-year period is the five-year period of validity of the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety Certificate.
5.8 Surveys required after transfer of the ship to the flag of another State
The certificates cease to be valid when a ship transfers to the flag of another State and it is
required that the Government of the State to which the ship transfers should not issue new
certificates until it is fully satisfied that the ship is being properly maintained and that there have
been no unauthorized changes made to the structure, machinery and equipment. When so
requested, the Government of the State whose flag the ship was formerly entitled to fly is
obliged to forward, as soon as possible, to the new Administration copies of certificates carried
by the ship before the transfer and, if available, copies of the relevant survey reports and
records, such as record of safety equipment and conditions of assignment for load line. When
fully satisfied by an inspection that the ship is being properly maintained and that there have
been no unauthorized changes, in order to maintain the harmonization of the surveys the new
Administration may give due recognition to initial and subsequent surveys carried out by, or on
behalf of, the former Administration and issue new certificates having the same expiry date as
the certificates that ceased to be valid because of the change of flag.
5.9 Recommended conditions for extending the period of validity of a certificate
5.9.1 In SOLAS 74/88 and other mandatory IMO instruments the following provision
applies: If a ship at the time when a certificate expires is not in a port in which it is to be
surveyed, the Administration may extend the period of validity of a certificate but this extension
should be granted only for the purpose of allowing the ship to complete its voyage to the port
in which it is to be surveyed, and then only in cases where it appears proper and reasonable
to do so. No certificate should be extended for a period longer than three months, and a ship
to which an extension is granted should not, on its arrival in the port in which is to be surveyed,
be entitled by virtue of such extension to leave that port without having a new certificate.
5.9.2 If a ship is in a port where the required survey cannot be completed, and where the
Convention allows the Administration to extend the certificate when it is proper and reasonable
to do so, the Administration should be guided by the following:
.2 the renewal survey should be carried out to the maximum extent possible;
.5 the ship should be allowed to sail directly to a named final agreed cargo
discharge port and then directly to a named agreed port to complete the
survey and/or dry-docking;
.6 the extension period should be for the minimum amount of time needed to
complete the survey and/or dry-docking under the relevant certificate(s);
.7 the condition of the ship found by the surveys indicated above should be
considered in determining the duration, distance and operational restrictions,
if any, of the voyage needed to complete the survey and/or dry-docking; and
.8 the extension period of the relevant statutory certificate(s) should not exceed
the period of validity of the certificate which may be issued to document
compliance with the structural, mechanical and electrical requirements of the
recognized classification society.
5.10.1 A minimum of two of the inspections of the outside of the ship's bottom during
any five-year period should be conducted in dry dock. In all cases, the maximum interval
between any two dry-dock bottom inspections should not exceed 36 months.
Note: The definition of "any five-year period" is the five-year period of validity of the
International Load Line Certificate.
5.10.3 Inspections of the ship's bottom required for the renewal survey that are not
conducted in dry dock may be carried out with the ship afloat. The bottom inspection,
regardless of method, should be carried out within the allowable time window for the Passenger
Ship Safety Certificate renewal survey (i.e. within the three-month time window before the
expiry date of the certificate). Additionally, inspections of the outside of the ship's bottom
conducted afloat should only be carried out when the conditions are satisfactory and the proper
equipment and suitably qualified staff is available. Rudder bearing clearances specified in
(PR) 5.2.2.1 need not be taken at the afloat inspections.
5.10.4 Special consideration should be given to ships 15 years of age or over before being
permitted to credit inspections afloat.
5.10.5 If a survey in dry dock is not completed within the maximum intervals referred
to above, the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate should cease to be valid until the survey in dry
dock is completed.
The survey of the radio installations, including those used in life-saving appliances, should
always be carried out by a qualified radio surveyor who has necessary knowledge of the
requirements of SOLAS 74, the International Telecommunication Union's Radio Regulations
and the associated performance standards for radio equipment. The radio survey should be
carried out using suitable test equipment capable of performing all the relevant measurements
required by these Guidelines. On satisfactory completion of the survey, the radio surveyor
should forward a report of the survey, which should also state the organization he or she
represents, to the authorities responsible for the issue of the ship's Cargo Ship Safety Radio
Certificate or Passenger Ship Safety Certificate.
* Refer to the Guidelines for the assessment of technical provisions for the performance of an in-water survey
in lieu of bottom inspection in dry-dock to permit one dry-dock examination in any five-year period for
passenger ships other than ro-ro passenger ships (MSC.1/Circ.1348).
The survey of the automatic identification system should always be carried out by a qualified
radio surveyor who has necessary knowledge of the requirements of SOLAS 74, the
International Telecommunication Union's Radio Regulations and the associated performance
standards for radio equipment. The survey of the automatic identification system should be
carried out using suitable test equipment capable of performing all the relevant measurements
required by and in accordance with the Guidelines on annual testing of the automatic
identification system (AIS) (MSC.1/Circ.1252).
5.13.1 In accordance with SOLAS 74/88 regulations XIV/2.1 and 3.1, MARPOL Annex I
regulation 47, MARPOL Annex II regulation 22, MARPOL Annex IV regulation 18 and
MARPOL Annex V regulation 14, the Polar Code is a standalone instrument, providing
requirements additional to SOLAS 74/88 and MARPOL for ships intended to operate in polar
waters. The requirements of the Polar Code should be surveyed in the context of the surveys
under SOLAS 74/88 and MARPOL, but do not form separate survey types.
5.13.2 For MARPOL Annexes I and II,† compliance with the Polar Code should be indicated
on the International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate and, where applicable, the International
Pollution Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk. For
SOLAS 74/88, the Polar Ship Certificate should be issued (Polar Code, paragraph 1.3) and
endorsed for compliance with the Polar Code. The Polar Ship Certificate should be perceived
as a certificate additional to SOLAS certificates for ships intended to operate in polar waters,
and the validities of other certificates are not affected by it when a ship stays outside of polar
areas.
5.13.3 Although there is no dedicated type of survey associated with the Polar Ship
Certificate, the following types of survey are applicable in the Survey Guidelines in annex 5
and contain survey items specific to the Polar Ship Certificate:
.1 the initial survey would confirm the survey scopes of the items related to
part I-A of the Polar Code with respect to the initial surveys of safety
construction, safety equipment and safety radio of cargo ships or the initial
survey of the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate;
.2 the annual survey would confirm the survey scopes of the items related to
part I-A of the Polar Code with respect to the periodical safety radio survey
and the annual safety construction and safety equipment surveys of cargo
ships;
.3 the intermediate survey would confirm the survey scopes of the items related
to part I-A of the Polar Code with respect to the intermediate safety
construction survey of cargo ships;
* Refer to the Unified interpretation of SOLAS regulation XIV/2.2 and paragraphs 1.3.2 and 1.3.6, part I-A of
the Polar Code (MSC.1/Circ. 1562).
† Refer to the Guidance for issuing revised certificates, manuals and record books under Annexes I, II and V
of MARPOL for compliance with environment-related requirements of the Polar Code (MEPC.1/Circ.856).
.4 the periodical survey (second or third year of its validity) would confirm the
survey scopes of the items related to part I-A of the Polar Code with respect
to the periodical safety equipment survey of cargo ships; and
.5 the renewal survey would confirm the survey scopes of the items related to
part I-A of the Polar Code with respect to the renewal surveys of safety
construction, safety equipment and safety radio of cargo ships or the renewal
survey of the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate.
5.13.4 For a Polar Ship Certificate issued to a cargo ship, the endorsements of the certificate
for annual survey, intermediate survey and periodical survey would confirm the satisfactory
completion of the survey scopes as stated respectively in (2) to (4) of paragraph 5.13.
5.13.5 For a Polar Ship Certificate issued to a passenger ship, only the endorsements in
accordance with SOLAS 74/88 regulations I/14(d) and I/14(e) or I/14(f) are applicable.
5.13.6 After the relevant surveys under the related SOLAS certificates together with the
survey items relevant to the Polar Code are carried out, the relevant SOLAS certificates should
then be endorsed prior to the Polar Ship Certificate being issued/endorsed.
5.13.7 In the event that the Polar Ship Certificate has ceased to be valid or has expired for a
period of time and other certificates remain valid, the Administration may require, as deemed
appropriate, a survey which addresses only the survey items additional to the survey items
under the related SOLAS certificates for reinstating the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate.
The duration of the related SOLAS certificates should remain unchanged.
ANNEX 1
(E) 1 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE CARGO SHIP SAFETY EQUIPMENT
CERTIFICATE
(EI) 1.1.1 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the examination of plans and designs should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.1.1 examining the plans for the fire pumps including the emergency fire
pump*, if applicable, fire mains, hydrants, hoses and nozzles and the
international shore connection (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/10.2
and 10.4.4 and FSS Code chs.2 and 12);
(EI) 1.1.1.2 checking the provision, specification and arrangements of the fire
extinguishers (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/6);
(EI) 1.1.1.3 checking the provision, specification and arrangements of the fire-fighters'
outfits including their self-contained compressed air breathing apparatus,
emergency escape breathing devices (EEBDs), onboard means of
recharging breathing apparatus cylinders used during drills or a suitable
number of spare cylinders to replace those used, and provision of two-way
portable radiotelephone apparatus of an explosion-proof type or
intrinsically safe (SOLAS 74/00/12 regs.II-2/10.10, 13.3.4, 13.4.3
and 15.2.2; FSS Code ch.3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/17) (BCH Code, ch.III,
part E);
(EI) 1.1.1.4 examining the plans for the fire-extinguishing arrangements in the
machinery spaces (SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/10.4 and 10.5
(except 10.5.5); FSS Code chs.5, 6 and 7) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/7);
(EI) 1.1.1.5 examining the plans for the special arrangements in the machinery
spaces (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/5.2, 8.3 and 9.5) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/11);
(EI) 1.1.1.6 checking the provision of a fixed fire detection and fire alarm system for
machinery spaces including periodically unattended machinery spaces
and enclosed spaces containing incinerators (SOLAS 74/00/10
regs.II-2/7.2, 7.3 and 7.4; FSS Code ch.9) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/13
and 14);
(EI) 1.1.1.7 checking the provision of a fixed fire detection and fire alarm system
and/or a sprinkler, fire detection and fire alarm system in
accommodation and service spaces and control stations
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/7.2, 7.3, 7.5.5, 7.7 and 10.6.2; FSS Code
chs.8 and 9) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/52);
* Refer to the Unified interpretation of chapter 12 of the International Code for Fire Safety Systems
(MSC.1/Circ.1388).
(EI) 1.1.1.9 examining the arrangements for remote closing of valves for oil fuel,
lubricating oil and other flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.4)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/15.2.5);
(EI) 1.1.1.10 examining the plans for the fire protection arrangements in cargo spaces
for general cargo and dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/00/14
regs.II-2/10.7.1, 10.7.2 and 19) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/53 and 54);
(EI) 1.1.1.11 examining the plans for the fire protection arrangements for ships
designed to carry containers on or above the weather deck, as
applicable, including provision of the water mist lance, and as
appropriate, mobile water monitors and all necessary hoses, fittings and
required fixing hardware together with the requirements additional to fire
pumps, fire mains, fire hoses and fire hydrants
(SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II 2/10.7.3);
(EI) 1.1.1.12 examining the plans for the fire protection arrangements in vehicle,
special category and ro-ro spaces, including the fire safety
arrangements for vehicle carriers carrying motor vehicles with
compressed hydrogen or natural gas in their tanks for their own
propulsion as cargo, as applicable (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/20
(except 20.2.2 and 20.5) and 20-1; FSS Code chs.5, 6, 7, 9 and 10)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/37, 38 and 53);
(EI) 1.1.1.14 examining the plans for the helicopter facilities (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/18) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.8);
(EI) 1.1.1.15 examining the plans for the special arrangements for the carriage of
dangerous goods, when appropriate, including water supplies, electrical
equipment and wiring, fire detection including sample extraction smoke
detection systems, where applicable, ventilation, bilge pumping,
personnel protection and any water spray system (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/19 (except 19.3.8, 19.3.10 and 19.4); FSS Code chs.9 and 10)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/54);
(EI) 1.1.1.16 examining the provision and disposition of the survival craft and rescue
boats and, where applicable, marine evacuation systems (MESs)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/11 to 16, 31 and 33);
(EI) 1.1.1.17 examining, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/06 regs.II-2/17
and III/38);
(EI) 1.1.1.18 examining the design of the survival craft, including their construction
equipment, fittings, release mechanisms and recovery appliances and
embarkation and launching arrangements (SOLAS 74/96/06/11
regs.III/4,16, 31, 32 to 33; LSA Code sections 3.2, 4.1 to 4.9, 6.1 and 6.2);
(EI) 1.1.1.19 checking that the life-saving appliances are of an international or vivid
reddish orange, or a comparably highly visible colour on all parts where
this will assist detection at sea (LSA Code section 1.2.2.6);
(EI) 1.1.1.20 examining the design of the rescue boats, including their equipment and
launching and recovery appliances and arrangements
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.III/17 and 31; LSA Code sections 5.1 and 6.1);
(EI) 1.1.1.22 examining the provision, specification and stowage of the distress flares
and the line-throwing appliance and the provision of onboard
communications equipment and the general alarm system
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/12.1 and 12.2, and regs.III/6 and 18; and LSA
Code sections 3.1, 7.1 and 7.2);
(EI) 1.1.1.23 examining the provision, specification and stowage of the lifebuoys,
including those fitted with self-igniting lights, self-activating smoke
signals and buoyant lines, lifejackets,* immersion suits and anti-exposure
suits (SOLAS 74/00/06 regs.III/7 and 32; LSA Code sections 2.1 to 2.5
and 3.1 to 3.3);
(EI) 1.1.1.24 checking that immersion suits designed to be worn in conjunction with a
lifejacket are suitably marked (LSA Code section 2.3.1);
(EI) 1.1.1.25 examining the plans for the lighting of the muster and embarkation
stations and the alleyways, stairways and exits giving access to the
muster and embarkation stations, including the supply from the
emergency source of power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/43 and III/11);
(EI) 1.1.1.26 examining the plans for the positioning of, and the specification for, the
navigation lights, shapes and sound signalling equipment
(COLREG 1972, rules 20 to 24, 27 to 30 and 33);
(EI) 1.1.1.27 examining the plans relating to the bridge design and arrangement of
navigational systems and equipment and bridge procedures
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.V/15 and 19);
(EI) 1.1.1.28 checking the provision and specification of the following navigation
equipment as appropriate: daylight signalling lamp, magnetic compass,
transmitting heading device, gyro compass, gyro compass repeaters,
radar installation(s), automatic identification system, electronic plotting
aid, automatic tracking aid(s) or automatic radar plotting aid(s),
echo-sounding device, speed and distance measuring device(s), rudder
angle indicator, propeller rate of revolution indicator, variable-pitch
(EI) 1.1.1.29 checking the provision and specification of voyage data recorder
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/20);
(EI) 1.1.1.30 checking the provision and specification of the long-range identification
and tracking system (SOLAS 74/04 reg.V/19-1);
(EI) 1.1.1.31 checking the plans and specification for the pilot transfer arrangement,
the pilot ladders, the combination arrangements, where applicable, the
access to the ship's deck and the associated equipment and lighting
(SOLAS 74/88/10 reg.V/23); and
(EI) 1.1.1.32 checking the provision of means of embarkation and disembarkation from
ships for use in port and in port-related operations, such as gangways and
accommodation ladders (SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-1/3-9).
(EI) 1.1.2 For the examination of plans and designs of the life-saving appliances
and the other equipment of cargo ships, the additional requirements for
tankers should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.2.1 examining the plans for the cargo tank protection (SOLAS 74/00/15
regs.II-2/4.5.3, 4.5.5, 4.5.6 and 10.8; FSS Code chs.14 and 15)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/60 and 62);
(EI) 1.1.2.2 examining the plans for gas measurement in double hull spaces and
double bottom spaces, including the fitting of permanent gas sampling
lines, where appropriate (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-2/4.5.7.2);
(EI) 1.1.2.3 examining, for oil tankers of 20,000 tonnes deadweight and above, the
plans for the fixed hydrocarbon gas detection system for measuring
hydrocarbon gas concentrations in all ballast tanks and void spaces of
double hull and double bottom spaces adjacent to the cargo tanks,
including the forepeak tank and any other tanks and spaces under the
bulkhead deck adjacent to cargo tanks (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-2/4.5.7.3
and FSS Code ch.16); and
(EI) 1.1.2.4 examining the plans for protection of the cargo pump-rooms
(SOLAS 78/00 regs.II-2/4.5.10 and 10.9) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/63).
(EI) 1.1.3 For the examination of plans and designs of the life-saving appliances
and the other equipment of cargo ships using natural gas as fuel other
than ships covered by the IGC Code, the additional requirements should
consist of:
(EI) 1.1.3.1 examining the plans, for the fire detection and alarm system and
fire-fighting arrangements (IGF Code paras. 11.4, 11.5, 11.6 and 11.7).
(EI) 1.1.4 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the survey during construction and after installation should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.4.1 examining the fire pumps and fire main and the disposition of the hydrants,
hoses and nozzles and the international shore connection and checking
that each fire pump, including the emergency fire pump, can be operated
separately so that two jets of water are produced simultaneously from
different hydrants at any part of the ship while the required pressure is
maintained in the fire main; and testing that the emergency fire pump has
the required capacity, and if the emergency fire pump is the main supply of
water for any fixed fire-extinguishing system, checking that that the
emergency fire pump has the capacity for this system* (SOLAS 74/00/14
reg.II-2/10.2; FSS Code chs.2 and 12) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/4 and 19);
(EI) 1.1.4.2 for ships designed to carry containers on or above the weather deck, as
applicable, testing the water mist lance, and as appropriate, the mobile
water monitors and examining all necessary hoses, fittings and required
fixing hardware, and testing that the mobile water monitors are capable to
be securely fixed to the ship structure ensuring safe and effective operation,
and testing that the mobile water monitor jets reach the top tier of containers
with all required monitors and water jets from fire hoses operated
simultaneously (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.7.3);
(EI) 1.1.4.3 examining the provision and disposition of the fire extinguishers
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.3; FSS Code ch.4) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/17);
* Refer to the Unified interpretation of chapter 12 of the International Code for Fire Safety Systems
(MSC.1/Circ.1388).
(EI) 1.1.4.9 examining any fire detection and alarm system and any automatic
sprinkler, fire detection and fire alarm system, and any sample extraction
smoke detection system, and confirming that installation tests have been
satisfactorily completed (SOLAS 74/00/10 regs.II-2/7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5.1,
7.5.5, 19.3.3 and 20.4; FSS Code chs.8, 9 and 10) (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/11, 13, 14, 53 and 54);
(EI) 1.1.4.10 examining the fire-extinguishing system for spaces containing paint
and/or flammable liquids and deep-fat cooking equipment in
accommodation and service spaces and confirming that installation tests
have been satisfactorily completed and that its means of operation are
clearly marked (SOLAS 74/00regs.II-2/10.6.3 and 10.6.4; FSS Code
chs.4 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.7) (BCH Code ch.III, part E);
(EI) 1.1.4.11 examining the arrangements for oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils and testing the remote closing of valves for oil fuel,
lubricating oil and other flammable oils and the operation of the remote
means of closing the valves on the tanks that contain oil fuel, lubricating
oil and other flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.4)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/15.2.5);
(EI) 1.1.4.12 examining the fire protection arrangements in cargo vehicle and ro-ro
spaces, including the fire safety arrangements for vehicle carriers
carrying motor vehicles with compressed hydrogen or natural gas in their
tanks for their own propulsion as cargo, as applicable, and confirming,
as far as practicable and as appropriate, the operation of the means for
closing the various openings (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/10.7.1, 10.7.2,
20.2.1, 20.3, 20.6.2, 20-1.2.1, 20-1.3, and 20-1.4) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/53);
EI) 1.1.4.13 examining the portable gas detectors suitable for the detection of the
gas fuel, for vehicle carriers carrying motor vehicles with compressed
hydrogen or natural gas in their tanks for their own propulsion as cargo
(SOLAS 74/14 regs.II-2/20-1.2.1 and 20-1.5);
(EI) 1.1.4.14 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
for fire safety or life-saving appliances and arrangements, in accordance
with the test and inspection requirements, if any, specified in the
approved documentation (SOLAS 74/00/06 regs.II-2/17 and III/38);
(EI) 1.1.4.15 examining, when appropriate, the special arrangements for carrying
dangerous goods, including checking the electrical equipment and
wiring, the ventilation, the provision of protective clothing and portable
appliances and the testing of the water supply, bilge pumping and any
water spray system (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19 (except 19.3.8,
19.3.10 and 19.4); FSS Code chs.9 and 10) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/54);
(EI) 1.1.4.16 checking that the life-saving appliances are of international or vivid
reddish orange, or a comparably highly visible colour on all parts where
this will assist detection at sea (LSA Code section 1.2.2.6);
(EI) 1.1.4.17 checking the provision and disposition of the survival craft, where
applicable, marine evacuation systems and rescue boats (SOLAS 74/88
regs.III/11 to 16 and 31; LSA Code section 6.2);
(EI) 1.1.4.18 deployment of 50% of the MES after installation (LSA Code
paragraph 6.2.2.2);
(EI) 1.1.4.19 examining each survival craft, including its equipment; for liferafts
provided for easy side-to-side transfer, verifying that they are less
than 185 kg (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/31; LSA Code sections 2.5, 3.1 to 3.3
and 4.1 to 4.9) (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/31.1);
(EI) 1.1.4.20 examining the embarkation arrangements for each survival craft and the
testing of each launching appliance, including overload tests, tests to
establish the lowering speed and the lowering of each survival craft to
the water with the ship at its lightest seagoing draught, and, where
applicable, launching underway at 5 knots, checking the recovery of
each lifeboat (SOLAS 74/00 regs.III/11, 12, 13, 16, 31 and 33; LSA Code
section 6.1);
(EI) 1.1.4.21 examining the embarkation arrangements for each marine evacuation
device, where applicable, and the launching arrangements, including
inspection for lack of side shell opening between the embarkation station
and waterline, review of distance to the propeller and other life-saving
appliances and ensuring that the stowed position is protected from
heavy weather damage, as much as practicable (SOLAS 74/00
reg.III/15; LSA Code section 6.2);
(EI) 1.1.4.22 examining each rescue boat, including its equipment; for inflatable
rescue boats, confirming that they are stowed in a fully inflated condition
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/14 and 31; LSA Code sections 2.5, 5.1 and 6.1);
(EI) 1.1.4.23 examining the embarkation and recovery arrangements for each rescue
boat and testing each launching and recovery appliance, including
overload tests, tests to establish the lowering and recovery speeds and
ensuring that each rescue boat can be lowered to the water and
recovered with the ship at its lightest seagoing draught, launching
underway at 5 knots (SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/14, 17 and 31; LSA Code
section 6.1);
(EI) 1.1.4.24 testing that the engine of the rescue boat(s) and of each lifeboat, when
so fitted, start satisfactorily and operate both ahead and astern
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/19);
(EI) 1.1.4.25 confirming that there are posters or signs in the vicinity of survival craft
and their launching stations and containers, brackets, racks and other
similar stowage locations for life-saving equipment (SOLAS 74/88
regs.III/9 and 20);
(EI) 1.1.4.26 examining the provision and stowage and checking the operation of
portable onboard communications equipment, if provided, and two-way
VHF radiotelephone apparatus and search and rescue locating devices
(SOLAS 74/88/08 regs.II-2/12.2 and III/6);
(EI) 1.1.4.27 examining the provision and stowage of the distress flares and the
line-throwing appliance, checking the provision and operation of fixed
onboard communications equipment, if provided, and testing the means
of operation of the general alarm system (SOLAS 74/00 regs.III/6
and 18; LSA Code sections 3.1, 7.1 and 7.2);
(EI) 1.1.4.28 examining the provision, disposition and stowage of the lifebuoys,
including those fitted with self-igniting lights, self-activating smoke signals
and buoyant lines, lifejackets,* immersion suits and anti-exposure suits
(SOLAS 74/00/06 regs.III/7 and 32; LSA Code sections 2.1 to 2.5 and 3.1
to 3.3);
(EI) 1.1.4.29 checking the lighting of the muster and embarkation stations and the
alleyways, stairways and exits giving access to the muster and
embarkation stations, including when supplied from the emergency
source of power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/43 and III/11);
(EI) 1.1.4.30 examining the provision and positioning and checking the operation of,
as appropriate, the navigation lights, shapes and sound signalling
equipment (COLREG 1972, rules 20 to 24, 27 to 30 and 33);
(EI) 1.1.4.31 checking that the minimum safe distances from the steering and
standard magnetic compasses for all electrical equipment are complied
with (SOLAS 74/00 regs.V/17 and 19);
(EI) 1.1.4.33 checking, as appropriate, the provision and operation of the following
shipborne navigational systems equipment (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19):
(EI) 1.1.4.33.1 the magnetic compass, including examining the siting, movement and
illumination and a pelorus or compass bearing device (SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/19);
(EI) 1.1.4.33.2 nautical charts and nautical publications necessary for the intended
voyage are available and have been updated, and, where ECDIS is
used, the electronic charts have been updated and the required backup
system is provided and updated (SOLAS 74/00/09 reg.V/19);
(EI) 1.1.4.33.9 radar(s), including examining the waveguide and cable runs for routeing
and protection and the display unit confirming lighting, correct operation
of all controls, and functions;
(EI) 1.1.4.33.10 electronic plotting aid, automatic tracking aid or automatic radar plotting
aid as appropriate, using the appropriate test facilities;
(EI) 1.1.4.33.11 speed and distance measuring devices "through the water" and "over
the ground";
(EI) 1.1.4.33.14 gyrocompass, including examining the alignment of the master and all
repeaters;
(EI) 1.1.4.34 checking for the provision and operation of the voyage data recorder
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/20);
(EI) 1.1.4.35 checking the record of the voyage data recorder annual performance
test (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/18);
(EI) 1.1.4.37 checking that a valid conformance test report of the long-range
identification and tracking system is available on board (SOLAS 74/04
reg.V/19-1);
(EI) 1.1.4.38 checking the provision of the pilot transfer arrangement, the access to
the ship's deck and the associated equipment and lighting, checking the
operation of the pilot ladders and the combination arrangements
(SOLAS 74/00/10 reg.V/23);
(EI) 1.1.5 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
for the additional requirements for tankers the survey during construction
and after installation should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.5.1 checking the deck foam system, including the supplies of foam
concentrate, and testing that the minimum number of jets of water at the
required pressure in the fire main is obtained (see (EI) 1.1.3.1) when the
system is in operation (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.8; FSS Code ch.15)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/61);
(EI) 1.1.5.2 examining the inert gas system (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/4.5.5; FSS
Code ch.15) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/62) and in particular:
(EI) 1.1.5.2.1 examining externally for any sign of gas or effluent leakage;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.2 confirming the proper operation of both inert gas blowers;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.4 checking the deck water seal for automatic filling and draining, and the
arrangements for protecting the system against freezing;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.5 where a double block and bleed valve is installed, checking the
automatic operations of the block and the bleed valves upon loss of
power;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.6 where two shut-off valves in series with a venting valve in between are
used as non-return devices, checking the automatic operation of the
venting valve, and the alarm for faulty operation of the valves;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.9 observing that the gas pressure-regulating valve automatically closes
when the inert gas blowers are secured;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.10 checking the means for separating the cargo tank not being inerted from
the inert gas main;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.11 checking the alarms of the two oxygen sensors positioned in the space
or spaces containing the inert gas system;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.12 checking, as far as practicable, the following alarms and safety devices
of the inert gas system using simulated conditions where necessary:
(EI) 1.1.5.2.12.1 high oxygen content of gas in the inert gas main;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.12.3 low pressure in the supply to the deck water seal;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.12.9 failure of the power supply to the automatic control system for the gas
regulating valve and to the instrumentation for continuous indication and
permanent recording of pressure and oxygen content in the inert gas main;
(EI) 1.1.5.2.13 checking the proper operation of the inert gas system on completion of
the checks listed above;
(EI) 1.1.5.3 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the cargo pump-room,
confirming that the installation tests have been satisfactorily completed
and that its means of operation are clearly marked (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/10.9; FSS Code chs.5, 6, 7 and 8, as applicable) and, when
appropriate, checking the operation of the remote means for closing the
various openings;
(EI) 1.1.5.4 examining the protection of the cargo pump-rooms and confirming that
the installation tests have been satisfactorily completed (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/4.5.10) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/55 to 58);
(EI) 1.1.5.5 examining, for all tankers, the arrangements for cargo tank protection,
(SOLAS 74/00/10/15 regs.II-2/4.5.3, 4.5.6 and 10.8; FSS Code chs.14
and 15) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/60 and 62);
(EI) 1.1.5.6 checking, for all tankers, the provision of at least one portable instrument
for measuring oxygen and one for measuring flammable vapour
concentrations, together with a sufficient set of spares, and suitable
means for the calibration of these instruments (SOLAS 74/10
reg.II-2/4.5.7.1);
(EI) 1.1.5.7 examining the arrangements for gas measurement in double hull spaces
and double bottom spaces, including the fitting of permanent gas
sampling lines, where appropriate (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-2/4.5.7.2); and
(EI) 1.1.5.8 examining, for oil tankers of 20,000 tonnes deadweight and above, the fixed
hydrocarbon gas detection system for measuring hydrocarbon gas
concentrations in all ballast tanks and void spaces of double hull and double
bottom spaces adjacent to the cargo tanks, including the forepeak tank and
any other tanks and spaces under the bulkhead deck adjacent to cargo tanks,
and confirming that the installation tests have been satisfactorily completed
(SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-2/4.5.7.3 and FSS Code ch.16).
(EI) 1.1.6 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for the ships using natural gas
as fuel other than ships covered by the IGC Code, the survey during
construction and after installation should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.6.1 examining the arrangements for fire protection and fire extinction
(IGF Code ch.11);
(EI) 1.1.6.2 examining the fire pump capacity and working pressure in relation to
water spray system, if the water spray system is part of the fire main
system (IGF Code para.11.4.1);
(EI) 1.1.6.3 examining the isolating valves of the fire main, when the fuel storage
tank(s) is located on the open deck (IGF Code para.11.4.2);
(EI) 1.1.6.4 examining the water spray system arrangement for fuel storage tanks(s)
on open deck including remote operation (IGF Code para.11.5);
(EI) 1.1.6.5 examining the fixed dry chemical powder fire-extinguishing system for
the bunkering station area (IGF Code para.11.6.1);
(EI) 1.1.6.6 examining the portable dry powder extinguisher (IGF Code para.11.6.2);
and
(EI) 1.1.6.7 examining the fixed fire detection and alarm system (IGF Code
para.11.7).
(EI) 1.1.7 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the check that the required documentation has been placed on board
should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.7.1 confirming that the fire control plans are permanently exhibited or,
alternatively, emergency booklets have been provided and that a
duplicate of the plans or the emergency booklet are available in a
prominently marked enclosure external to the ship's deckhouse
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/15.2.4) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/20);
(EI) 1.1.7.2 confirming that maintenance plans have been provided (SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/14.2.2 and 14.4);
(EI) 1.1.7.3 confirming that the training manuals and the fire safety operational
booklets have been provided (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/15.2.3, 16.2
and 16.3);
(EI) 1.1.7.4 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangement is on board (SOLAS 74/00/06
regs.II-2/17 and III/38);
(EI) 1.1.7.5 confirming, where appropriate, that the ship is provided with a document
indicating compliance with the special requirement for carrying
dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/00/08, reg.II-2/19.4) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/54(3));
(EI) 1.1.7.6 confirming that emergency instructions are available for each person on
board, that the muster list is posted in conspicuous places and they are
in a language understood by the persons on board (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/8 and 37);
(EI) 1.1.7.7 confirming that ship-specific plans and procedures for recovery of persons
from the water have been provided (SOLAS 74/12 reg.III/17-1);
(EI) 1.1.7.8 confirming that the training manual and training aids for the life-saving
appliances have been provided and are available in the working
language of the ship (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/35);
(EI) 1.1.7.9 confirming that the instructions for onboard maintenance of the
life-saving appliances have been provided (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/36);
(EI) 1.1.7.10 confirming that a table or curve of residual deviations for the magnetic
compass has been provided, and that a diagram of the radar installations
shadow sectors is displayed (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(EI) 1.1.7.11 checking that operational and, where appropriate, maintenance manuals
for all navigational equipment are provided (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/16);
(EI) 1.1.7.12 checking that records are provided, identifying any pilot ladders placed
into service (SOLAS 74/10 reg.V/23.2.4);
(EI) 1.1.7.13 checking that the charts and nautical publications necessary for the
intended voyage are available and have been updated (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/27);
(EI) 1.1.7.14 checking that the International Code of Signals and an up-to-date copy
of Volume III of the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and
Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual have been provided (SOLAS 74/00/02
reg.V/21);
(EI) 1.1.7.16 checking that an illustrated table describing the life-saving signals to be
used by ships, aircraft or persons in distress is available (SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/29); and
(EI) 1.1.7.17 confirming that a continuous synopsis record is provided (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XI-1/5).
(EI) 1.1.8 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for tankers the check that the
required documentation has been placed on board should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.8.1 confirming, when appropriate, that the instruction manuals for the inert
gas system have been provided (FSS Code ch.15 paragraph 2.2.5)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/62.21); and
(EI) 1.1.8.2 confirming that the operating and maintenance instructions for the
fixed hydrocarbon gas detection system are provided (SOLAS 74/10
reg.II-2/4.5.7.3 and FSS Code ch.16).
(EI) 1.1.9 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the completion of the initial survey should consist of:
(EI) 1.1.9.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate
and its associated Record of Equipment (Form E) should be issued.
(EA) 1.2.1 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(EA) 1.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.2 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.3 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(EA) 1.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.6 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.7 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(EA) 1.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(EA) 1.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(EA) 1.2.1.10 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(EA) 1.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.12 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.13 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(EA) 1.2.1.14 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(EA) 1.2.1.16 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.17 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(EA) 1.2.1.18 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(EA) 1.2.1.19 checking the manning and supervision of survival craft (SOLAS 74/00
reg.III/10);
(EA) 1.2.1.20 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements is on board (SOLAS 74/00/06
regs.II-2/17 and III/38);
(EA) 1.2.1.21 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(EA) 1.2.1.22 confirming that the fire control plans are permanently exhibited or,
alternatively, that emergency booklets have been provided and that a
duplicate of the plans or the emergency booklet are available in a
prominently marked enclosure external to the ship's deckhouse
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/15.2.4) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/20);
(EA) 1.2.1.23 confirming that the maintenance plans have been provided
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/14.2.2 and 14.4);
(EA) 1.2.1.24 confirming that the training manuals and the fire safety operational
booklets have been provided (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/15.2.3, 16.2
and 16.3);
(EA) 1.2.1.25 checking whether any fire has occurred on board necessitating the
operation of the fixed fire-extinguishing systems or the portable fire
extinguishers since the last survey;
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI. (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(EA) 1.2.1.26 checking, when appropriate, that the ship is provided with a document
indicating compliance with the special requirements for carrying
dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19.4) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/54(3));
(EA) 1.2.1.27 confirming, when appropriate, that there is a special list, manifest or
stowage plan for the carriage of dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/88
reg.VII/5(3));
(EA) 1.2.1.28 confirming, when appropriate, that the instruction manuals for the inert
gas system have been provided and checking from the records of the
pressure and oxygen content that the inert gas system is being operated
correctly (FSS Code ch.15) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/62);
(EA) 1.2.1.29 confirming that, where applicable, a factual statement has been provided
on board by the lifeboat release and retrieval system manufacturer or
one of their representatives that confirms the successful completion of
the overhaul examination of an existing lifeboat release and retrieval
system found to be compliant with paragraphs 4.4.7.6.4 to 4.4.7.6.6 of
the LSA Code, or, alternatively, that a statement of acceptance of the
installation of a replacement release and retrieval system to an existing
lifeboat is available (SOLAS 74/11 reg.III/1.5; LSA Code
section 4.4.7.6);
(EA) 1.2.1.30 checking that log-book entries are being made (SOLAS 74/00/12
regs.III/19 and 20) and in particular:
(EA) 1.2.1.30.1 the date when the last full muster of the crew for boat and fire drill took place,
and the date when the last enclosed space entry and rescue drills took place;
(EA) 1.2.1.30.2 the records indicating that the lifeboat equipment was examined at that
time and found to be complete;
(EA) 1.2.1.30.3 the last occasion when the lifeboats were swung out and when each one
was lowered into the water;
(EA) 1.2.1.30.4 the records indicating that crew members have received the appropriate
onboard training;
(EA) 1.2.1.30.5 the records indicating that on voyages where passengers are scheduled
to be on board for more than 24 h, musters of newly embarked
passengers have taken place prior to or immediately upon departure;
(EA) 1.2.1.31 confirming that the training manual and training aids for the life-saving
appliances are available on board in the working language of the ship
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/35);
(EA) 1.2.1.32 confirming that the checklist and instructions for onboard maintenance
of the life-saving appliances are on board (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/36);
(EA) 1.2.1.33 confirming that a table or curve of residual deviations for the magnetic
compass has been provided, the compass deviation book has been
properly maintained and a diagram of the radar installations shadow
sectors is displayed (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(EA) 1.2.1.34 checking that operational and, where appropriate, maintenance manuals
for all navigational equipment are provided (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/16);
(EA) 1.2.1.35 checking that nautical charts and nautical publications necessary for the
intended voyage are available and have been updated, and, where
electronic systems are used, the required backup system is provided
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.V/19 and 27);
(EA) 1.2.1.36 checking that the International Code of Signals and an up-to-date copy
of Volume III of the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and
Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual have been provided. (SOLAS 74/00/02
reg.V/21);
(EA) 1.2.1.37 checking that records are maintained identifying any pilot ladders placed
into service and any repair effected (SOLAS 74/10 reg.V/23.2.4);
(EA) 1.2.1.38 checking that an illustrated table describing the life-saving signals to be
used by ships, aircraft or persons in distress is available (SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/29);
(EA) 1.2.1.39 checking that records of navigational activities and daily reporting have
been maintained (SOLAS 74/00/03 reg.V/28);
(EA) 1.2.1.40 confirming that a continuous synopsis record is provided (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XI-1/5); and
(EA) 1.2.2 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the annual survey should consist of:
(EA) 1.2.2.1 examining the fire pumps, fire main, hydrants, hoses and nozzles and
the international shore connection and checking that each fire pump,
including the emergency fire pump, can be operated separately so that
two jets of water are produced simultaneously from different hydrants at
any part of the ship while the required pressure is maintained in the fire
main (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.2; FSS Code chs.2 and 12)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/4 and 19);
(EA) 1.2.2.2 for ships designed to carry containers on or above the weather deck, as
applicable, examining the water mist lance, and as appropriate, the
mobile water monitors and all necessary hoses, fittings and required
fixing hardware (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.7.3);
(EA) 1.2.2.3 checking the provision and randomly examining the condition of the
portable and non-portable fire extinguishers (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.3;
FSS Code ch.4) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/6);
(EA) 1.2.2.4 confirming that the fire-fighters' outfits including their self-contained
compressed air breathing apparatus and emergency escape breathing
devices (EEBDs) are complete and in good condition, that the cylinders,
including the spare cylinders, of any required self-contained breathing
apparatus are suitably charged, and that onboard means of recharging
breathing apparatus cylinders used during drills or a suitable number of
spare cylinders to replace those used are provided, and provision of
(EA) 1.2.2.6 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the machinery, cargo, vehicle,
special category and ro-ro spaces, as appropriate, and confirming that its
means of operation is clearly marked (SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/10.4,
10.5, 10.7.1, 10.7.2 and 20.6.1; FSS Code chs.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/7 and 53);
(EA) 1.2.2.7 examining the fire-extinguishing and special arrangements in the
machinery spaces and confirming, as far as practicable and as
appropriate, the operation of the remote means of control provided for
the opening and closing of the skylights, the release of smoke, the
closure of the funnel and ventilation openings, the closure of
power-operated and other doors, the stopping of ventilation and boiler
forced and induced draft fans and the stopping of oil fuel and other
pumps that discharge flammable liquids (SOLAS 74/00/12/14
regs.II-2/5.2, 8.3, 9.5 and 10.5) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/7 and 11);
(EA) 1.2.2.8 checking that fixed carbon dioxide fire-extinguishing systems for the
protection of machinery spaces and cargo pump-rooms, where
applicable, are provided with two separate controls, one for opening of the
gas piping and one for discharging the gas from the storage container,
each of them located in a release box clearly identified for the particular
space (SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/10.4.1.5);
(EA) 1.2.2.9 examining, as far as possible, and testing, as feasible, any fire detection
and alarm system and any sample extraction smoke detection system
(SOLAS 74/00/10 regs.II-2/7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5.1, 7.5.5, 19.3.3 and 20.4; FSS
Code chs.9 and 10) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/11, 13, 14, 53 and 54);
(EA) 1.2.2.10 examining the fire-extinguishing systems for spaces containing paint
and/or flammable liquids and deep-fat cooking equipment in
accommodation and service spaces (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/10.6.3
and 10.6.4; FSS Code chs.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.7) (BCH
Code ch.III, part E);
(EA) 1.2.2.12 examining the arrangements for oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils and testing the remote closing of valves for oil fuel,
lubricating oil and other flammable oils and the operation of the remote
means of closing the valves on the tanks that contain oil fuel, lubricating
oil and other flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.4)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/15.2.5);
(EA) 1.2.2.13 examining and testing of the general emergency alarm system
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/20);
(EA) 1.2.2.14 examining the fire protection arrangements in cargo, vehicle and ro-ro
spaces, including the fire safety arrangements for vehicle carriers
(EA) 1.2.2.15 examining and testing the portable gas detectors suitable for the
detection of the gas fuel, for vehicle carriers carrying motor vehicles with
compressed hydrogen or natural gas in their tanks for their own
propulsion as cargo (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/20-1.2 and 20-1.5);
(EA) 1.2.2.16 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements for
fire safety or life-saving appliances and arrangements, in accordance with
the test, inspection and maintenance requirements, if any, specified in the
approved documentation (SOLAS 74/00/06 regs.II-2/17 and III/38);
(EA) 1.2.2.17 examining, when appropriate, the special arrangements for carrying
dangerous goods, including checking the electrical equipment and
wiring, the ventilation, the provision of protective clothing and portable
appliances and the testing of the water supply, bilge pumping and any
water spray system (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19 (except 19.3.8, 19.3.10
and 19.4)) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/54);
(EA) 1.2.2.18 checking that emergency instructions are available for each person on
board and that copies of the suitably updated muster list are posted in
conspicuous places and that they are in a language understood by all
persons on board and confirming that there are posters or signs in the
vicinity of survival craft and their launching stations (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/8, 9 and 37);
(EA) 1.2.2.19 checking that the life-saving appliances are of an international or vivid
reddish orange, or a comparably highly visible colour on all parts where
this will assist detection at sea (LSA Code section 1.2.2.6);
(EA) 1.2.2.20 examining each survival craft, including its equipment and, when fitted,
the on-load release mechanism and hydrostatic lock and, for inflatable
liferafts, the hydrostatic release unit and float-free arrangements;
checking that the hand-held flares are not out of date (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/16, 20 and 31; LSA Code sections 2.5, 3.1 to 3.3, 4.1.5, 4.4.7
and 4.4.8);
(EA) 1.2.2.21 for liferafts provided for easy side-to-side transfer, verifying that they are
less than 185 kg (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/31.1);
(EA) 1.2.2.22 checking that the falls used in launching appliances have been
periodically inspected and have been renewed as necessary in the
past five years (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/20);
(EA) 1.2.2.23 examining the embarkation arrangements and launching appliances for
each survival craft; each lifeboat should be lowered to the embarkation
position or, if the stowage position is the embarkation position, lowered
a short distance and, if practicable, one of the survival craft should be
lowered to the water; the operation of the launching appliances for
davit-launched liferafts should be demonstrated (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/11, 12, 13, 16, 20 and 31; LSA Code section 6.1);
(EA) 1.2.2.25 examining each rescue boat, including its equipment; for inflatable
rescue boats, confirming that they are stowed in a fully inflated condition
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/14 and 31; LSA Code sections 2.5 and 5.1);
(EA) 1.2.2.26 confirming that there are posters or signs in the vicinity of the survival
craft, their launching stations and containers, brackets, racks and other
similar stowage locations for life-saving equipment (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/9 and 20);
(EA) 1.2.2.27 examining the embarkation and recovery arrangements for each rescue
boat; if practicable, the rescue boat(s) should be lowered to the water
and its recovery demonstrated (SOLAS 74/00 regs.III/14, 17 and 31;
LSA Code section 6.1);
(EA) 1.2.2.28 testing that the engine of the rescue boat(s) and of each lifeboat, when
so fitted, start satisfactorily and operate both ahead and astern;
(EA) 1.2.2.29 examining and checking the operation of two-way VHF radiotelephone
apparatus and search and rescue locating devices (SOLAS 74/88/08
reg.III/6);
(EA) 1.2.2.30 examining the line-throwing appliance and checking that its rockets and
the ship's distress signals are not out of date, and examining and
checking the operation of onboard communications equipment and the
general emergency alarm system (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/12.2 and III/6
and 18; LSA Code sections 3.1, 7.1 and 7.2);
(EA) 1.2.2.31 examining the provision, disposition, stowage and condition of the
lifebuoys, including those fitted with self-igniting lights, self-activating
smoke signals and buoyant lines, lifejacket* and their whistles and lights,
immersion suits and anti-exposure suits and that their associated
batteries are not out of date (SOLAS 74/88/06 regs.III/7 and 32, LSA
Code sections 2.1 to 2.5);
(EA) 1.2.2.32 checking that immersion suits designed to be worn in conjunction with a
lifejacket are suitably marked (LSA Code section 2.3.1);
(EA) 1.2.2.33 checking the lighting of the muster and embarkation stations and the
alleyways, stairways and exits giving access to the muster and
embarkation stations, including when supplied from the emergency
source of power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/42 or 43 and III/11);
(EA) 1.2.2.34 checking that the required navigation lights, shapes and sound signalling
equipment are in order (COLREG 1972, rules 20 to 24, 27 to 30 and 33);
(EA) 1.2.2.35 checking that the following items of navigation equipment are in working
order, as appropriate: daylight signalling lamp, magnetic compass,
transmitting heading device, gyro compass, gyro compass repeaters,
radar installation(s), electronic plotting aid, automatic tracking aid(s) or
automatic radar plotting aid(s), echo-sounding device, speed and
distance measuring device(s), rudder angle indicator, propeller rate of
revolution indicator, variable-pitch propeller pitch and operational mode
indicator, rate-of-turn indicator, heading or track control system, Global
Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver, terrestrial radio navigation
system and sound reception system, means of communication with
emergency steering position, a pelorus or compass bearing device,
means for correcting heading and bearings, BNWAS as applicable and
ECDIS including backup arrangements, as applicable; items that cannot
be checked with the ship in port should be verified from records
(SOLAS 74/00/09/13 reg.V/19);
(EA) 1.2.2.37 checking the rotational deployment of the marine evacuation system
(MES) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/20.8.2; LSA Code section 6.2.2.2);
(EA) 1.2.2.38 checking the provision, specification, operation and annual performance
test of the voyage data recorder, where fitted (SOLAS 74/00/04
reg.V/20);
(EA) 1.2.2.39 checking the provision and operation of the automatic identification
system, where fitted, and whether the annual test has been carried out
and a copy of the test report is on board (SOLAS 74/00/04/10
regs.V/18.9 and 19);
(EA) 1.2.2.40 checking that a valid conformance test report of the long-range
identification and tracking system is available on board, where fitted
(SOLAS 74/04 reg.V/19-1);
(EA) 1.2.2.41 checking the provision and specification of the pilot ladders and pilot
transfer arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/10 reg.V/23);
(EA) 1.2.2.42 checking that the means of embarkation and disembarkation from ships
for use in port and in port-related operations, such as gangways and
accommodation ladders, are in satisfactory condition, as applicable
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-1/3-9);
(EA) 1.2.2.44 confirming that ship-specific plans and procedures for recovery of
persons from the water have been provided (SOLAS 74/12 reg.III/17-1).
(EA) 1.2.3 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for tankers the annual survey
should consist of:
(EA) 1.2.3.1 checking the deck foam system, including the supplies of foam
concentrate and testing that the minimum number of jets of water at the
required pressure in the fire main is obtained (see (EA) 1.2.2.1) when
the system is in operation (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.8; FSS Code ch.14)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/61);
(EA) 1.2.3.2 examining the inert gas system (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/4.5.5; FSS
Code ch.15) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/62), and in particular:
(EA) 1.2.3.2.1 examining externally for any sign of gas or effluent leakage;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.2 confirming the proper operation of both inert gas blowers;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.4 checking the deck water seal for automatic filling and draining, and the
arrangements for protecting the system against freezing;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.5 where a double block and bleed valve is installed, checking the automatic
operations of the block and the bleed valves upon loss of power;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.6 where two shut-off valves in series with a venting valve in between are
used as non-return devices, checking the automatic operation of the
venting valve, and the alarm for faulty operation of the valves;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.9 observing that the gas pressure regulating valve automatically closes
when the inert gas blowers are secured;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.10 checking the means for separating the cargo tank not being inerted from
the inert gas main;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.11 checking the alarms of the two oxygen sensors positioned in the space
or spaces containing the inert gas system;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.12 checking, as far as practicable, the following alarms and safety devices
of the inert gas system using simulated conditions where necessary:
(EA) 1.2.3.2.12.1 high oxygen content of gas in the inert gas main;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.12.3 low pressure in the supply to the deck water seal;
(EA) 1.2.3.2.12.9 failure of the power supply to the automatic control system for the gas
regulating valve and to the instrumentation for continuous indication and
permanent recording of pressure and oxygen content in the inert gas
main;
(EA) 1.2.3.7 examining, as far as possible, and testing the fixed hydrocarbon gas
detection system (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-2/4.5.7.3 and FSS Code ch.16);
(EA) 1.2.3.8 checking condition and operation of water spray and air supply systems
that are in totally enclosed lifeboats and have self-contained air support
systems (LSA Code sections 4.4 and 4.6 to 4.9);
(EA) 1.2.3.9.1 checking temperature sensing devices for bulkhead glands and alarms;
(EA) 1.2.4 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for the ships using natural gas
as fuel other than ships covered by the IGC Code, the annual survey
should consist of:
(EA) 1.2.4.1 examining the arrangements for fire protection and fire extinction (IGF
Code ch.11);
(EA) 1.2.4.2 examining the fire pump capacity and working pressure in relation to
water spray system, if the water spray system is part of the fire main
system (IGF Code para.11.4.1);
(EA) 1.2.4.3 examining the isolating valves of the fire main, when the fuel storage
tank(s) is located on the open deck (IGF Code para.11.4.2);
(EA) 1.2.4.4 examining the water spray system for cooling, fire protection and crew
protection (IGF Code para.11.5);
(EA) 1.2.4.5 examining the water spray system arrangement for fuel storage tanks(s)
on open deck including remote operation (IGF Code para.11.5);
(EA) 1.2.4.6 examining the fixed fire detection and alarm system (IGF Code
para.11.7);
(EA) 1.2.4.7 examining the fixed dry chemical powder fire-extinguishing system for
the bunkering station area (IGF Code para.11.6.1); and
(EA) 1.2.4.8 examining the portable dry powder extinguisher (IGF Code para.11.6.2).
(EA) 1.2.5 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the completion of the annual survey should consist of:
(EA) 1.2.5.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate
should be endorsed; and
(EA) 1.2.5.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(EP) 1.3.1 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships the
examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(EP) 1.3.2 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the periodical survey should consist of:
(EP) 1.3.2.2 confirming, during the examination of the fixed fire-fighting system for
the machinery, cargo, vehicle, special category and ro-ro spaces, that,
as appropriate, any foam compounds and the CO2 capacity have been
checked and that the distribution pipework has been proved clear
(SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/10.4, 10.5, 10.7.1, 10.7.2 and 20.6.1;
FSS Code chs.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/7 and 53);
(EP) 1.3.2.3 testing the operation of the remote means of control provided for the
opening and closing of the skylights, the release of smoke, the closure
of the funnel and ventilation openings, the closure of power-operated
and other doors, the stopping of ventilation and boiler forced and
induced draft fans and the stopping of oil fuel and other pumps that
discharge flammable liquids (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/5.2, 8.3, 9.5
and 10.5) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/11);
(EP) 1.3.2.4 testing any fire detection and alarm system and any sample extraction
smoke detection system (SOLAS 74/00/10 regs.II-2/7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5.5,
19.3.3 and 20.4; FSS Code chs.9 and 10) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/11,
13, 14, 53 and 54);
(EP) 1.3.2.5 testing, as feasible, the fire-extinguishing system for spaces containing
paint and/or flammable liquids and deep-fat cooking equipment in
accommodation and service spaces (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/10.6.3
and 10.6.4; FSS Code chs.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.7);
(EP) 1.3.2.6 testing the remote closing of valves for oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils and the operation of the remote means of closing the
valves on the tanks that contain oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.4) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/15.2.5);
(EP) 1.3.2.7 testing the operation of the means of control provided for closing the
various openings for the cargo, vehicle, special category and ro-ro
spaces (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/5.2 and 20.3) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/53); and
(EP) 1.3.2.8 testing, as feasible, the helicopter facilities (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/18)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.8).
(EP) 1.3.3 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment for the additional
requirements for tankers the periodical survey should consist of:
(EP) 1.3.3.2 confirming during the examination of the fixed fire-fighting system for the
cargo pump-rooms that, as appropriate, any foam compounds have
been checked and that the distribution pipework has been proved clear
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.9; FSS Code chs.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/63) and checking the operation of the remote means for closing
the various openings.
(EP) 1.3.4 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for the ships using natural gas
as fuel other than ships covered by the IGC Code, the periodical survey
should consist of:
(EP) 1.3.5 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the completion of the periodical survey should consist of:
(EP) 1.3.5.1 after a satisfactory survey, the cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate
should be endorsed; and
(EP) 1.3.5.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(ER) 1.4.1 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships the
examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(ER) 1.4.1.1 the provisions of (EA) 1.2.1, except for the validity of the Cargo Ship
Safety Equipment Certificate.
(ER) 1.4.2 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the renewal survey should consist of:
(ER) 1.4.2.2 for ships designed to carry containers on or above the weather deck, as
applicable, testing that the mobile water monitors can be securely fixed
to the ship structure ensuring safe and effective operation, and testing
that the mobile water monitor jets reach the top tier of containers with all
required monitors and water jets from fire hoses operated
simultaneously (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.7.3).
(ER) 1.4.3 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for tankers the renewal survey
should consist of:
(ER) 1.4.3.2 examining the deck water seal for the inert gas system internally and
checking the condition of the non-return valve (FSS Code ch.15,
paragraphs 2.2.3.1 and 2.3.1.6.2) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/62).
(ER) 1.4.4 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships,
concerning the additional requirements for the ships using natural gas
as fuel other than ships covered by the IGC Code, the renewal survey
should consist of:
(ER) 1.4.5 For the life-saving appliances and the other equipment of cargo ships
the completion of the renewal survey should consist of:
(ER) 1.4.5.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate
should be issued.
(C) 2 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE CARGO SHIP SAFETY CONSTRUCTION
CERTIFICATE
(CI) 2.1.1 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the examination
of plans and designs should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.1.1 examining the plans for the hull (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/11, 12-1, 14, 18
and 19) (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/9, 10, 11, 12, 13-1, 15, 15-1, 16
and 16-1);
(CI) 2.1.1.2 examining plans to verify that bulk carriers of 150 m in length and above,
where appropriate, meet the applicable structural requirements of an
organization recognized by the Administration, or national standards of
the Administration, conforming to the functional requirements of the
Goal-based Ship Construction Standards for Bulk Carriers and Oil
Tankers (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3-10);
(CI) 2.1.1.3 examining the plans for the bilge pumping and drainage systems
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21) (SOLAS 74/05/08/09 regs.II-1/35-1
and II-2/20.6.1.4);
(CI) 2.1.1.4 examining the stability information and the damage control plans
(SOLAS 74/88/00 regs.II-1/22, 23-1 and 25-8) (SOLAS 74/06/08
regs.II-1/5, 5-1 and 19; IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3);
(CI) 2.1.1.5 examining the plans for the machinery installation (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/26 to 36);
(CI) 2.1.1.6 examining the plans for the electrical installation (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/40, 41, 43, 44 and 45);
(CI) 2.1.1.7 examining, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/15 regs.II-1/55
and II-2/17 and IGF Code, ch.2);
(CI) 2.1.1.8 examining the plans for the periodically unattended machinery spaces
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.5) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/46 to 53);
(CI) 2.1.1.9 examining the plans for the structural fire protection, including ventilation
systems, in accommodation and service spaces, control stations and
machinery spaces and oil fuel and lubricating oil systems
(SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/4.2.2, 4.2.2.3, 4.2.2.4, 4.2.2.5, 4.4, 5.2,
5.3.1, 5.3.2, 6.2, 6.3, 7.5.5, 7.7, 8.2, 8.4, 9.2.1, 9.3, 9.5, 9.7.1, 9.7.2,
9.7.3, 9.7.5.2, 9.7.6, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5 and 17) (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/42 to 52 (except 45 and 51));
(CI) 2.1.1.10 examining the plans for the structural fire protection, including ventilation
systems, in cargo spaces (SOLAS 74/00/15 regs.II-2/5.2, 9.7.1, 9.7.2,
9.7.3, 9.7.6, 11.2, 11.3, 11.5, 19.3.8, 19.3.10, 20.2.1, 20.3, 20-1.2.1,
20-1.3 and 20-1.4) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/42 to 54);
(CI) 2.1.1.11 examining the plans for the means of escape (SOLAS 74/00/14
regs.II-2/13.2, 13.3.1, 13.3.3, 13.4.2 and 13.6; FSS Code ch.13
paragraph 3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/45);
(CI) 2.1.1.12 examining the plans for the arrangements for gaseous fuel for domestic
purposes (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/51);
(CI) 2.1.1.13 examining the arrangements for the openings in the shell plating below
the freeboard deck (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(CI) 2.1.1.14 examining the plans for helicopter facilities for ships fitted with such
facilities (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/18) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.8);
(CI) 2.1.1.15 examining the Cargo Securing Manual for ships carrying cargoes other
than solid and liquid bulk cargoes, cargo units and cargo transport
units(SOLAS 74/98/02 reg.VI/5.6);
(CI) 2.1.1.16 checking for the loading booklet for carriage of cargoes in bulk
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.VI/7);
(CI) 2.1.1.17 examining the loading instrument for bulk carriers of 150 m in length and
upwards (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/11);
(CI) 2.1.1.18 confirming that bulk carriers, when appropriate, meet the requirements
of damage stability and structural strength with its cargo hold(s) flooded,
including other structural requirements (SOLAS 74/97/04 regs.XII/3, 4,
5 and 6);
(CI) 2.1.1.19 examining the functionality of bilge well alarms to all cargo holds and
conveyor tunnels (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/9);
(CI) 2.1.1.20 confirming that the ship is constructed in accordance with the
requirements of a recognized classification society, or one with
equivalent national standards (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-1/3-1);
(CI) 2.1.1.21 confirming that a corrosion prevention system is fitted, when appropriate, in
dedicated seawater ballast tanks arranged in ships and double-side skin
spaces arranged in bulk carriers of 150 m in length and upwards
(SOLAS 74/04/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CI) 2.1.1.22 examining, for oil tankers and bulk carriers when appropriate, the Ship
Structure Access Manual (SOLAS 74/00/02/04 reg.II-1/3-6(4));
(CI) 2.1.1.23 for bulk carriers, checking the arrangements for hold, ballast and dry
space water level detectors and their audible and visual alarms
(SOLAS 74/02 reg.XII/12);
(CI) 2.1.1.24 for bulk carriers, checking the arrangements for availability of draining
and pumping systems forward of the collision bulkhead (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XII/13);
(CI) 2.1.1.25 examining the calculation and drawings for the sufficient safe working
load of towing and mooring equipment to enable the safe conduct of all
towing and mooring operation in normal operation of the ship
(SOLAS 74/04 reg.II-1/3-8); and
(CI) 2.1.2 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
examination of plans and designs the additional requirements for oil
tankers, chemical tankers and gas carriers should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.2.1 examining the plans for the steering gear (SOLAS 74/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.2.2 examining the plans for the electrical installation (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-1/43) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/45);
(CI) 2.1.2.3 examining the plans for the structural fire protection (SOLAS 74/00/15
regs.II-2/1.6, 4.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.5.9, 9.2.4, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6.3 and 11.6)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/55 to 58);
(CI) 2.1.2.4 examining the plans for the cargo tank venting, cargo tank purging and
gas freeing and other ventilation arrangements and protection of the
cargo tank structure against pressure or vacuum (SOLAS 74/00/15
regs.II-2/4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.6, 4.5.8, 11.6 and 16.3) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/59);
(CI) 2.1.2.5 examining the plans of access to bow (SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.II-1/3-3);
(CI) 2.1.2.6 examining the plans for emergency towing, for tankers of not less
than 20,000 tonnes deadweight (SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.II-1/3-4);
(CI) 2.1.2.7 checking the access to spaces in the cargo area of oil tankers
(SOLAS 74/88/92/00 reg.II-1/12-2) (SOLAS 74/04 reg.II-1/3-6); and
(CI) 2.1.2.8 examining plans to verify that oil tankers of 150 m in length and above,
where appropriate, meet the applicable structural requirements of an
organization recognized by the Administration, conforming to the
functional requirements of the Goal-based Ship Construction Standards
for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3-10).
(CI) 2.1.3 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
examination of plans and designs additional requirements for the ships
using natural gas as fuel other than ships covered by the IGC Code
should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.3.1 examining the plans for the fuel containment systems, control of vapour
space of liquefied gas fuel tanks, vapour detection, gauging, loading
limits for liquefied gas fuel tanks and other special requirements
(IGF Code chs.5, 6, 7, 8 and 15));
(CI) 2.1.3.2 examining the plans for the ship arrangements (IGF Code ch.5);
(CI) 2.1.3.3 examining the plans for piping systems (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 7 and 9);
(CI) 2.1.3.4 examining the plans for the pressure control (IGF Code ch.6);
(CI) 2.1.3.5 examining the plans for the environmental control (IGF Code ch.6);
(CI) 2.1.3.6 examining the plans for machinery installation (IGF Code ch.10);
(CI) 2.1.3.7 examining the plans for fire protection (IGF Code section 11.3);
(CI) 2.1.3.8 examining the plans for the ventilation systems (IGF Code chs.12
and 13);
(CI) 2.1.3.9 examining the plans for the electrical installations (IGF Code chs.12
and 14); and
(CI) 2.1.3.10 examining the plans for the control, monitoring and safety systems (IGF
Code ch.15).
(CI) 2.1.4 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the survey during
construction and after installation should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.4.1 confirming that the collision bulkhead is watertight up to the freeboard
deck, that the valves fitted on the pipes piercing the collision bulkhead
are operable from above the freeboard deck and that there are no doors,
manholes, ventilation ducts or any other openings
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/11) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/12);
(CI) 2.1.4.2 confirming in accordance with the survey plan that bulk carriers of 150 m
in length and above, where appropriate, meet the applicable structural
requirements of an organization recognized by the Administration, or
national standards of the Administration, conforming to the functional
requirements of the Goal-based Ship Construction Standards for Bulk
Carriers and Oil Tankers (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3.10);
(CI) 2.1.4.3 confirming that the subdivision bulkheads are constructed and tested as
watertight up to the freeboard deck or margin line, as applicable
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/14) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/10 and 11);
(CI) 2.1.4.4 confirming that each watertight door has been tested (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/18) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/16);
(CI) 2.1.4.5 confirming that the arrangements for operating any watertight doors are
generally in accordance with the requirements for passenger ships and
carrying out similar tests (see (PI) 5.1.2.6 to (PI) 5.1.2.8) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13-1);
(CI) 2.1.4.7 confirming that each bilge pump and the bilge pumping system provided
for each watertight compartment is working efficiently (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/21) (SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(CI) 2.1.4.8 confirming that the drainage system of enclosed cargo spaces situated
on the freeboard deck is working efficiently (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21)
(SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(CI) 2.1.4.8.1 examining visually the drainage facilities for blockage or other damage
and confirming the provision of means to prevent blockage of drainage
arrangements, for closed vehicle and ro-ro spaces and special category
spaces where fixed pressure water-spraying systems are used
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/20.6.1.5);
(CI) 2.1.4.9 conducting an inclining test, when this is required (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/22) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/5);
(CI) 2.1.4.10 confirming that the machinery, boilers and other pressure vessels,
associated piping systems and fittings are installed and protected so as
to reduce to a minimum any danger to persons on board, due regard
being given to moving parts, hot surfaces and other hazards
(SOLAS 74/00/15 reg.II-2/4.2 (except 4.2.2.3.4 relating to remote
closing of valves included in safety equipment)) (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/26, 32, 33 and 34) (SOLAS 74/88/06 reg.II-2/15
(except 15.2.5 ));
(CI) 2.1.4.11 confirming that the normal operation of the propulsion machinery can be
sustained or restored even though one of the essential auxiliaries
becomes inoperative (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(CI) 2.1.4.12 confirming that means are provided so that the machinery can be
brought into operation from the dead ship condition without external aid
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(CI) 2.1.4.13 confirming that the boilers, all parts of the machinery, all steam,
hydraulic, pneumatic and other systems and their associated fittings
which are under internal pressure have been subjected to the
appropriate tests, including a pressure test as may be specified in the
requirements of the Administration or the classification societies
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(CI) 2.1.4.14 confirming that means are provided to ensure that the safe speed is not
exceeded where there is the risk of machinery overspeeding
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(CI) 2.1.4.15 confirming that, where practicable, means are provided to protect
against overpressure in the parts of main, auxiliary and other machinery
that are subject to internal pressure and may be subject to dangerous
overpressure (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(CI) 2.1.4.16 confirming that, when required, crankcase explosion relief devices are
fitted to internal combustion engines and that they are arranged so as to
minimize the possibility of injury to personnel (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(CI) 2.1.4.17 confirming that main turbine propulsion machinery and, where
applicable, main internal combustion propulsion machinery and auxiliary
machinery are provided with automatic shut-off arrangements in the
case of failures, such as lubricating oil supply failure, which could rapidly
lead to a complete breakdown, serious damage or explosion
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(CI) 2.1.4.18 confirming and recording the ability of the machinery to reverse
the direction of the thrust of the propeller in sufficient time and to
bring the ship to rest within a reasonable distance, including the
(CI) 2.1.4.19 confirming that the main and auxiliary steering gear are so arranged that
the failure of one of them does not render the other inoperative †
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.20 confirming that, where appropriate, essential components of the steering
gear are permanently lubricated or provided with lubrication fittings
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.21 confirming that relief valves are fitted to any part of a steering gear
hydraulic system which can be isolated and in which pressure can be
generated from the power source or from external forces and that these
relief valves are set to a pressure not exceeding the design pressure
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.22 confirming that the main steering gear is capable of steering the ship at
maximum ahead service speed and is capable of putting the rudder over
from 35° on one side to 35° on the other side with the ship at its deepest
seagoing draught and running ahead at maximum ahead service speed
and, under the same conditions, from 35° on either side to 30° on the
other side in not more than 28 s,‡ or, where demonstration at the deepest
seagoing draught is impracticable, with alternative permissible sea trial
loading condition§ (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.23 confirming that the auxiliary steering gear is capable of steering the ship
at navigable speed and of being brought speedily into action in an
emergency and that it is capable of putting the rudder over from 15° on
one side to 15° on the other side in not more than 60 s with the ship at
its deepest seagoing draught and running ahead at one half of the
maximum ahead service speed or 7 knots, whichever is the greater,** or,
where this is impracticable, with an alternative permissible sea trial
loading condition†† (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.24 confirming that the main and auxiliary steering gear power units restart
automatically when power is restored after a power failure, that they are
capable of being brought into operation from a position on the navigating
* For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, II-1/29 and II-1/30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
† For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, II-1/29 and II-1/30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
‡ For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, II-1/29 and II-1/30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
§ Refer to the Unified interpretations of SOLAS regulations II-1/29.3 and II-1/29.4 (MSC.1/Circ.1536).
** For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, II-1/29 and II-1/30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
†† Refer to the Unified interpretations of SOLAS regulations II-1/29.3 and II-1/29.4 (MSC.1/Circ.1536).
bridge and that, in the event of a power failure to any one of the steering
gear power units, an audible and visual alarm is given on the navigating
bridge (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.25 confirming that, where the main steering gear comprises two or more
identical power units and an auxiliary steering gear is not fitted, a defect
can be isolated so that steering capability can be maintained or speedily
regained after a single failure in its piping system or in one of the power
units* (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.26 confirming that the control systems for the main steering gear from both
the navigating bridge and the steering gear compartment are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/8814 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.27 confirming that, where the main steering gear comprises two or more
identical power units and an auxiliary steering gear is not fitted, the two
independent control systems from the navigating bridge are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.28 confirming that the control system for the auxiliary steering gear in the
steering gear compartment and, if this gear is power-operated, from the
navigating bridge are operating satisfactorily and that the latter is
independent of the control system for the main steering gear
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.29 confirming that the control system for any main and auxiliary steering
gear control system operable from the navigating bridge is capable of
being brought into operation from a position on the navigating bridge,
that means are provided in the steering gear compartment for
disconnecting it from the steering gear that it serves and that an audible
and visual alarm is given on the navigating bridge in the event of a failure
of electrical power supply (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.30 confirming that the electric power circuits and steering gear control
systems, together with their associated components, cables and pipes,
are separated, as far as practicable, throughout their length
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.31 confirming that the means of communication between the bridge and the
steering gear compartment is operating satisfactorily and that, with ships
having emergency steering positions, a telephone or other means of
communication for relaying heading information and supplying visual
compass readings to the emergency steering position are provided
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29) (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(CI) 2.1.4.32 confirming that the angular position of the rudder is indicated
independently of the steering control system on the navigating bridge if
the main steering gear is power-operated and that this angular position
is given in the steering gear compartment (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29)
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
* For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, II-1/29 and II-1/30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
(CI) 2.1.4.33 confirming that with a hydraulic power-operated steering gear the
audible and visual low-level alarms on the navigating bridge and in the
machinery space for each hydraulic fluid reservoir are operating
satisfactorily and that at least one power actuating system including the
reservoir can be recharged from a position within the steering gear
compartment by means of a fixed storage tank (to which a contents
gauge is fitted) with fixed piping (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.34 confirming that the steering gear compartment is readily accessible, that
it is separated, as far as practicable, from machinery spaces and is
provided with suitable arrangements to ensure working access to
steering gear machinery and controls under safe conditions
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.4.35 confirming that with electric and electro-hydraulic steering gear the
means are provided for indicating on the navigating bridge and at a main
machinery control position that the motors are running and that the
overload alarm and alarm for the loss of a phase in a three-phase supply
located at the main machinery control position are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/30);
(CI) 2.1.4.36 confirming that the main and auxiliary machinery essential for propulsion
and the safety of the ship are provided with the effective means for its
operation and control (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(CI) 2.1.4.37 confirming that appropriate means are provided where it is intended that
the propulsion machinery should be remotely controlled from the
navigating bridge, including, where necessary, the control, monitoring,
reporting, alert and safety actions. (SOLAS 74/00/02 reg.II-1/31);
(CI) 2.1.4.38 confirming that arrangements to operate main and other machinery from
a machinery control room are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(CI) 2.1.4.39 confirming that, in general, means are provided for manually overriding
automatic controls and that a failure does not prevent the use of the
manual override (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(CI) 2.1.4.40 confirming that oil-fired and exhaust gas boilers, unfired steam
generators, steam pipe systems and air pressure systems are fitted with
the appropriate safety features (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/32, 33 and 34);
(CI) 2.1.4.41 confirming the operation of the ventilation for the machinery spaces
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/35);
(CI) 2.1.4.42 when appropriate, confirming that the measures to prevent noise in
machinery spaces are effective (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/36 and
SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12.2); or confirming that the ship was
constructed to reduce onboard noise and to protect personnel from noise
in accordance with the Code on Noise Levels on board Ships, adopted
by resolution MSC.337(91), as amended (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(CI) 2.1.4.43 confirming that the engine-room telegraph giving visual indication of the
orders and answers both in the machinery space and on the navigating
bridge is operating satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/37);
(CI) 2.1.4.45 confirming that the engineer's alarm is clearly audible in the engineers'
accommodation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/38);
(CI) 2.1.4.46 confirming that precautions, taken to prevent any oil that may escape
under pressure from any pump, filter or heater from coming into contact
with heated surfaces, are efficient (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3);
(CI) 2.1.4.47 confirming that the means of ascertaining the amount of oil contained in
any oil tank are in good working condition (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.5);
(CI) 2.1.4.48 confirming that the devices provided to prevent overpressure in any oil
tank or in any part of the oil system, including the filling pipes, are in
good working condition (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.4);
(CI) 2.1.4.49 confirming that forepeak tanks are not intended for carriage of oil fuel,
lubrication oil and other flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3);
(CI) 2.1.4.50 confirming that the electrical installations, including the main source of
power and lighting systems, are installed in accordance with the
approved plans (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/40 and 41);
(CI) 2.1.4.52 confirming that the starting arrangements of each emergency generating
set are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/44);
(CI) 2.1.4.53 confirming that precautions have been provided against shock, fire and
other hazards of electrical origin (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/45);
(CI) 2.1.4.54 confirming that the arrangements for periodically unattended machinery
spaces are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/46 to 53) and in
particular:
(CI) 2.1.4.54.1 checking the fire precautions and testing alarms, as appropriate;
(CI) 2.1.4.54.2 checking the means for the protection against flooding;
(CI) 2.1.4.54.3 checking the means to control the propulsion from the navigating bridge;
(CI) 2.1.4.54.4 ensuring that a means of vocal communication between the main
machinery control room or its control position, as appropriate, and the
navigating bridge and engineer officer's accommodation is provided and
is effective;
(CI) 2.1.4.54.5 checking that an alarm system is provided with random testing of
functions;
(CI) 2.1.4.54.6 checking that means are provided to automatically shut down machinery
or boiler operations in the event of serious malfunction and testing the
alarms;
(CI) 2.1.4.54.7 ensuring that special requirements for the machinery, boiler and
electrical installations, as appropriate, are provided;
(CI) 2.1.4.55 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
for machinery or electrical installations or low-flashpoint fuel storage and
distribution systems, or fire safety, in accordance with the test and
inspection requirements, if any, specified in the approved documentation
(SOLAS 74/00/06/15 regs.II-1/55 and II-2/17 and IGF Code ch.2);
(CI) 2.1.4.56 confirming that all aspects of the structural fire protection, including the
ventilation systems, in accommodation and service spaces, control
stations and machinery spaces are installed in accordance with the
approved plans, testing the operation of fire dampers of ventilation ducts
and the means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all ventilation
systems and proving that the power ventilation is capable of being
stopped from outside the space served (SOLAS 74/00/12/14
regs.II-2/4.4, 5.2, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 6.2, 6.3, 7.5.5, 7.7, 8.2, 8.4, 9.2.1, 9.3,
9.4.2, 9.5, 9.7.1, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.5.2, 9.7.6, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 and 11.5)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/42 to 44, 46 to 50 and 52);
(CI) 2.1.4.57 confirming that all aspects of the structural fire protection, including the
ventilation systems, in cargo spaces are installed in accordance with the
approved plans, testing the operation of fire dampers of ventilation ducts
and the means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all ventilation
systems and proving that the power ventilation is capable of being
stopped from outside the space served (SOLAS 74/00/15 regs.II-2/5.2.1,
9.7.1, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.6, 11.2, 11.3, 11.5, 19.3.8, 19.3.10, 20.2.1, 20.3,
20-1.2.1, 20-1.3 and 20-1.4) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/42 to 44, 46 to 50
and 52 to 54);
(CI) 2.1.4.58 confirming that stairways and ladders are so arranged as to provide a
means of escape from all accommodation spaces and from spaces in
which the crew is normally employed, other than machinery spaces, to
the open deck and thence to the lifeboats and liferafts (SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/13.2, 13.3.1, 13.3.3 and13.6; FSS Code ch.13 paragraph 3)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/45) and in particular that:
(CI) 2.1.4.58.1 at all levels of accommodation there are provided at least two widely
separated means of escape from each restricted space or group of spaces;
(CI) 2.1.4.58.2 below the lowest open deck the main means of escape is a stairway (the
second being a trunk or a stairway);
(CI) 2.1.4.58.3 above the lowest open deck the means of escape are stairways or doors
to an open deck or a combination of them;
(CI) 2.1.4.58.4 the radiotelegraph station has direct access to the open deck or is
provided with two means of access or egress, one of which is a porthole
or window of sufficient size;
(CI) 2.1.4.59 confirming that two widely separated means of escape and, when
appropriate, a fire shelter from the lower part of the space, are provided
from each machinery space of Category A and that suitable escape routes
are provided from other machinery spaces, and that two means of escape
are provided for machinery control rooms and for main workshops located
within the machinery space of Category A, as applicable
(SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/13.4.2; FSS Code ch.13 paragraph 3)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/45);
(CI) 2.1.4.60 examining the arrangements for gaseous fuel for domestic purposes
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.3);
(CI) 2.1.4.61 confirming, when appropriate, that all aspects of the helicopter facilities
are installed in accordance with the approved plans (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/18) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.8);
(CI) 2.1.4.63 confirming, for bulk carriers, that dedicated seawater ballast tanks have
an efficient corrosion protection system such as hard coating
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CI) 2.1.4.64 confirming that dedicated seawater ballast tanks arranged in ships and
double side skin spaces arranged in bulk carriers of 150 m in length and
upward when appropriate have been coated in accordance with
resolution MSC.215(82), as amended (SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CI) 2.1.4.65.1 checking that the Technical Data Sheet and Statement of Compliance
or Type Approval Certificate comply with the Standard;
(CI) 2.1.4.65.3 checking that the inspector is qualified in accordance with the
qualification standards;
(CI) 2.1.4.65.4 checking that the inspector's reports of surface preparation and the
coating's application indicate compliance with the manufacturer's
Technical Data Sheet and Statement of Compliance or Type Approval
Certificate; and
(CI) 2.1.4.66 reviewing the coating technical file (SOLAS 74/00/06/10 regs.II-1/3-2
and II-1/3-11; MSC.215(82), as amended, and MSC.288(87), as
amended);
(CI) 2.1.4.67 confirming for oil tankers and bulk carriers, when appropriate,
the provision of means of access to cargo and other spaces in
accordance with the arrangements in the Ship Structures Access
Manual (SOLAS 74/00/02/04 reg.II-1/3-6, SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3-10
and MSC.287(87));
(CI) 2.1.4.68 for bulk carriers, examining and testing the hold, ballast and dry space
water level detectors and their audible and visual alarms (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XII/12);
(CI) 2.1.4.69 for bulk carriers, checking the arrangements for availability of draining
and pumping systems forward of the collision bulkhead (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XII/13);
(CI) 2.1.4.70 confirming, for bulk carriers, that the loading instrument is on board and
functioning (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/11);
(CI) 2.1.4.71 confirming that the ship's identification number is permanently marked
(SOLAS 74/02 reg.XI-1/3);
(CI) 2.1.4.72 confirming that the towing and mooring equipment is properly marked
with any restriction associated with its safe operation (SOLAS 74/04
reg.II-1/3-8); and
(CI) 2.1.5 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for oil tankers the survey during construction
and after installation should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.5.1 confirming, when appropriate, that the main steering gear comprises the
necessary two or more identical power units and the requisite
arrangements to regain steering capability in the event of the prescribed
single failure (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CI) 2.1.5.2 confirming in accordance with the survey plan that oil tankers of 150 m
in length and above, where appropriate, meet the applicable structural
requirements of an organization recognized by the Administration, or
national standards of the Administration, conforming to the functional
requirements of the Goal-based Ship Construction Standards for Bulk
Carriers and Oil Tankers (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3-10);
* Refer to the Guidelines to facilitate the selection of portable atmosphere testing instruments for enclosed spaces
as required by SOLAS regulation XI-1/7 (MSC.1/Circ.1477).
† Refer to the Unified interpretation of SOLAS regulation XIV/2.2 and paragraphs 1.3.2 and 1.3.6, part I-A of
the Polar Code (MSC.1/Circ. 1562).
(CI) 2.1.5.3 confirming that a hull return system of distribution and earthed
distribution system are not used (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/45);
(CI) 2.1.5.4 confirming that all aspects of the location of spaces and the structural
fire protection, including the special arrangements when the ship is a
combination carrier, are in accordance with the approved plans
(SOLAS 74/00/12 regs.II-2/1.6, 4.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.5.9, 9.2.4, 9.3 and 9.6.3)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/55 to 58);
(CI) 2.1.5.5 confirming that permanent approved gastight lighting enclosures for
illuminating cargo pump-rooms, having adequate strength and not
impairing the integrity and gas tightness of the bulkheads or decks, are
fitted in bulkheads and decks separating cargo pump-rooms and other
spaces (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.5.2.5) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/58.5);
(CI) 2.1.5.6 confirming that all aspects of the cargo tank venting, cargo tank purging
and gas freeing and other ventilation arrangements and protection of the
cargo tank structure against pressure or vacuum are in accordance with
the approved plans (SOLAS 74/00/15 regs.II-2/4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.6, 4.5.8
and 11.6) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/59 and 62.13.1 to 62.13.3);
(CI) 2.1.5.7 confirming that access to bow is arranged in accordance with approved
plans (SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.II-1/3-3);
(CI) 2.1.5.8 confirming, for tankers of not less than 20,000 tonnes deadweight, that
emergency towing is arranged in accordance with approved plans
(SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.II-1/3-4);
(CI) 2.1.5.9 confirming, when appropriate, that dedicated seawater ballast tanks
have an efficient corrosion protection system such as hard coating
(SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CI) 2.1.5.10 confirming that all cargo oil tanks in crude oil tankers have either:
(CI) 2.1.6 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for chemical tankers and gas carriers, the
survey during construction and after installation should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.7 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for the ships using natural gas as fuel other than
ships covered by the IGC Code, the survey during construction and after
installation should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.7.1 confirming that the arrangement of the accommodation, the fuel
containment system, service and machinery spaces are in accordance
with the approved plans and control, monitoring and safety systems are
satisfactory (IGF Code chs.4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 15);
(CI) 2.1.7.2 confirming the inert gas system is satisfactory (IGF Code ch.6);
(CI) 2.1.7.3 confirming that the fuel containment systems are arranged and installed
in accordance with the approved plans, internally examining the fuel
containment systems and ensuring that the appropriate testing is carried
out (IGF Code chs.6 and 16);
(CI) 2.1.7.5 confirming that the fire protection is installed in accordance with the
approved plans (IGF Code ch.11.3);
(CI) 2.1.7.6 confirming the ventilation arrangements are satisfactory (IGF Code
chs.12 and 13); and
(CI) 2.1.7.7 examining the electrical installations with particular reference to the
certified safe type equipment fitted in gas-dangerous spaces and zones
(IGF Code chs.12 and 14).
(CI) 2.1.8 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the check that the
required documentation has been placed on board should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.8.1 confirming that the stability information and the damage control plans
and damage control booklets have been provided (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/22 and 23-1) (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/5-1 and 19);
(CI) 2.1.8.2 checking, where applicable, that the noise survey report as required by
the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships is available on board
(SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(CI) 2.1.8.3 confirming that the manoeuvring booklet has been provided and that the
manoeuvring information has been displayed on the navigating bridge
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/28);
(CI) 2.1.8.4 confirming that the approved Cargo Securing Manual for ships carrying
cargoes other than solid and liquid bulk cargoes, cargo units and cargo
transport units is provided on board (SOLAS 74/98/02 reg.VI/5.6);
(CI) 2.1.8.5 confirming, for oil tankers and bulk carriers when appropriate, that the
Ship Structure Access Manual is on board (SOLAS 74/00/02/04
reg.II-1/3-6(4));
(CI) 2.1.8.7 confirming when appropriate that a coating technical file reviewed
by the Administration has been provided on board (SOLAS 74/00/06/10
regs.II-1/3-2 and 3-11);
(CI) 2.1.8.9 confirming, for oil tankers and bulk carriers of 150 m in length and above,
that the Ship Construction File has been provided (SOLAS 74/10
reg.II-1/3-10 and MSC.290(87));
(CI) 2.1.8.10 confirming, when appropriate, that a technical file verified by the
Administration has been provided on board (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3 11
and MSC.289(87)); and
(CI) 2.1.8.11 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements is on board (SOLAS 74/00/06/15
regs.II-1/55 and II-2/17 and IGF Code ch.2).
(CI) 2.1.9 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the completion of
the initial survey should consist of:
(CI) 2.1.9.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate should be issued.
(CA) 2.2.1 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the examination
of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(CA) 2.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.2 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.3 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(CA) 2.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.6 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.7 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(CA) 2.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(CA) 2.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(CA) 2.2.1.10 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(CA) 2.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.12 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.13 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(CA) 2.2.1.14 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(CA) 2.2.1.16 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.17 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(CA) 2.2.1.18 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(CA) 2.2.1.19 checking, where applicable, that the noise survey report as required by
the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships is available on board
(SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(CA) 2.2.1.20 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements is on board (SOLAS 74/00/06/15
regs.II-1/55 and II-2/17);
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(CA) 2.2.1.21 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so, confirm
that it has been approved before installation and that any changes are
reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(CA) 2.2.1.23 confirming that the stability information, including damage stability,
where applicable, and the damage control plans and damage control
booklets are on board (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/22, 23 and 25)
(SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/5-1 and 19);
(CA) 2.2.1.24 confirming that the manoeuvring booklet is on board and that the
manoeuvring information is displayed on the navigating bridge
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/28);
(CA) 2.2.1.25 checking by the log-book entries that the testing and the emergency
drills of the steering gear have been carried out (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/26)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.V/19);
(CA) 2.2.1.26 checking that the routine surveys of the boilers and other pressure
vessels, as determined by the Administration, have been carried out as
required and that safety devices, such as the boiler safety valves, have
been tested;
(CA) 2.2.1.27 checking that, as appropriate, the hull and machinery has been
presented for survey in accordance with the continuous survey scheme
approved by the Administration or a classification society;
(CA) 2.2.1.28 confirming, when appropriate, that a complete file of the enhanced
survey reports and the Condition Evaluation Report are on board;*
(CA) 2.2.1.29 confirming that suitable Material Safety Data Sheets are available on
board;
(CA) 2.2.1.30 confirming, for bulk carriers, that the loading/unloading booklet required
in SOLAS regulation VI/7.2 is on board (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/8.1);
(CA) 2.2.1.31 confirming, that bulk carriers of 150 m in length and upwards of single
side skin construction designed to carry solid bulk cargoes having a
density of 1,780 kg/m3 and above, constructed before 1 July 1999, have,
after the implementation date given in SOLAS 74/94/97 reg.XII/3,
sufficient stability and strength to withstand flooding of the foremost
cargo hold (SOLAS 74/97/04 regs.XII/3, 4 and 6);
(CA) 2.2.1.32 confirming that approved Cargo Securing Manual for ships carrying
cargoes other than solid and liquid bulk cargoes, cargo units and cargo
transport units is on board (SOLAS 74/98/02 reg.VI/5.6);
(CA) 2.2.1.33 confirming that the loading booklet for carriage of cargoes in bulk is on
board (SOLAS 74/00 reg.VI/7);
* Refer to the International Code on the Guidelines on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during
Surveys of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CA) 2.2.1.34 confirming, for oil tankers and bulk carriers when appropriate, that the
Ship Structure Access Manual is on board (SOLAS 74/00/02,
reg.II-1/3-6(4));
(CA) 2.2.1.35 confirming that structural alterations performed, if any, have been
approved by the classification society and reported on the as-built
drawings kept on board (SOLAS 74/04 reg.II-1/3-7);
(CA) 2.2.1.36 confirming, when appropriate, that the coating technical file is available
on board and maintained (SOLAS 74/00/06/10 regs.II-1/3-2 and 3-11);
(CA) 2.2.1.37 confirming, when appropriate, that the maintenance of the protective
coating is included in the overall ship's maintenance system
(SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CA) 2.2.1.38 confirming, where appropriate, for crude oil tankers, that a technical file
verified by the Administration has been provided on board (SOLAS 74/10
reg.II-1/3-11 and MSC.289(87));
(CA) 2.2.1.39 confirming, for oil tankers and bulk carriers of 150 m in length and above,
that the Ship Construction File is available and updated, where
applicable* (SOLAS 74/10 reg.II-1/3-10 and MSC.287(87)); and
(CA) 2.2.2 For the hull,† machinery and equipment of cargo ships the annual survey
should consist of:
(CA) 2.2.2.1 examining, in general and as far as can be seen, the hull and its closing
appliances;
(CA) 2.2.2.2 examining the anchoring and mooring equipment as far as can be seen;
for ships built after 1 January 2007, confirming that the towing and
mooring equipment is properly marked with any restriction associated
with its safe operation (SOLAS 74/04 reg.II-1/3-8);
(CA) 2.2.2.3 examining, for bulk carriers of 150 m and above, where appropriate, the
ship's structure in accordance with the Ship Construction File, taking into
account identified areas that need special attention (SOLAS 74/10
reg.II-1/3-10 and MSC.287(87));
(CA) 2.2.2.4 examining the collision and the other watertight bulkheads as far as
can be seen (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/11 and 14) (SOLAS 74/06
regs.II-1/10, 11 and 12);
(CA) 2.2.2.5 examining and testing (locally and remotely) all the watertight doors in
watertight bulkheads (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/18) (SOLAS 74/06
reg.II-1/16);
* Refer also to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of Bulk
Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
† Refer also to annex A to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys
of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CA) 2.2.2.6 examining the arrangements for closing openings in the shell plating
below the freeboard deck (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(CA) 2.2.2.7 examining each bilge pump and confirming that the bilge pumping
system for each watertight compartment is satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/21) (SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(CA) 2.2.2.8 confirming that the drainage from enclosed cargo spaces situated on the
freeboard deck is satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21) (SOLAS 74/05
reg.II-1/35-1);
(CA) 2.2.2.8.1 examining visually the drainage facilities for blockage or other damage
and confirming the provision of means to prevent blockage of drainage
arrangements, for closed vehicle and ro-ro spaces and special category
spaces where fixed pressure water-spraying systems are used
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/20.6.1.5);
(CA) 2.2.2.9 confirming that the machinery, boilers and other pressure vessels,
associated piping systems and fittings are installed and protected so as
to reduce to a minimum any danger to persons on board, due regard
being given to moving parts, hot surfaces and other hazards
(SOLAS 74/00/15 reg.II-2/4.2 (except 4.2.2.3.4 relating to remote
closing of valves included in safety equipment)) (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/26, 32, 33 and 34) (SOLAS 74/88/06 reg.II-2/15
(except 15.2.5));
(CA) 2.2.2.10 confirming that the normal operation of the propulsion machinery can be
sustained or restored even though one of the essential auxiliaries
becomes inoperative (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(CA) 2.2.2.11 confirming that means are provided so that the machinery can be
brought into operation from the dead ship condition without external aid
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(CA) 2.2.2.12 carrying out a general examination of the machinery, the boilers, all
steam, hydraulic, pneumatic and other systems and their associated
fittings to see whether they are being properly maintained and with
particular attention to the fire and explosion hazards (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/26 and 27);
(CA) 2.2.2.13 examining and testing the operation of main and auxiliary steering
arrangements, including their associated equipment and control
systems (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CA) 2.2.2.14 confirming that the means of communication between the navigation
bridge and steering gear compartment and the means of indicating the
angular position of the rudder are operating satisfactorily
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29) (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(CA) 2.2.2.15 confirming that with ships having emergency steering positions there are
means of relaying heading information and, when appropriate, of
supplying visual compass readings to the emergency steering position
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29 and SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19 or the
SOLAS 74/88 reg.V/12 in force prior to 1 July 2002 as appropriate);
(CA) 2.2.2.16 confirming that the various alarms required for hydraulic
power-operated, electric and electro-hydraulic steering gears are
operating satisfactorily and that the re-charging arrangements for
hydraulic power-operated steering gears are being maintained
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29 and SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/30);
(CA) 2.2.2.17 examining the means for the operation of the main and auxiliary
machinery essential for the propulsion and the safety of the ship,
including, when applicable, the means of remotely controlling the
propulsion machinery from the navigating bridge (including the control,
monitoring, reporting, alert and safety actions) and the arrangements to
operate the main and other machinery from a machinery control room
(SOLAS 74/88/00/02 reg.II-1/31);
(CA) 2.2.2.18 confirming the operation of the ventilation for the machinery spaces
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/35);
(CA) 2.2.2.19 when appropriate, confirming that the measures to prevent noise in
machinery spaces are effective (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/36 and
SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12.2); or confirming that the ship was
constructed to reduce onboard noise and to protect personnel from noise
in accordance with the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships, adopted
by resolution MSC.337(91), as amended (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(CA) 2.2.2.20 confirming that the engine-room telegraph, the second means of
communication between the navigation bridge and the machinery space
and the means of communication with any other positions from which
the engines are controlled are operating satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/37);
(CA) 2.2.2.21 confirming that the engineer's alarm is clearly audible in the engineers'
accommodation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/38);
(CA) 2.2.2.22 examining, as far as practicable, visually and in operation, the electrical
installations, including the main source of power and the lighting systems
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/40 and 41);
(CA) 2.2.2.23 confirming, as far as practicable, the operation of the emergency
source(s) of electrical power including their starting arrangements, the
systems supplied and, when appropriate, their automatic operation
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/43 and 44);
(CA) 2.2.2.24 examining, in general, that the precautions provided against shock, fire
and other hazards of electrical origin are being maintained
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/45);
(CA) 2.2.2.25 examining the arrangements for periodically unattended machinery
spaces (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/46 to 53) and, in particular, the random
testing of alarm, automatic and shutdown functions;
(CA) 2.2.2.26 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements for
machinery or electrical installations, low-flashpoint fuel storage and
distribution systems, or fire safety, in accordance with the test, inspection
and maintenance requirements, if any, specified in the approved
documentation (SOLAS 74/00/06/15 regs.II-1/55 and II-2/17 and
IGF Code ch.2);
(CA) 2.2.2.27 confirming, as far as practicable, that no changes have been made in
the structural fire protection, examining any manual and automatic fire
doors and proving their operation, testing the fire dampers of ventilation
ducts and the means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all
ventilation systems and testing the means of stopping power ventilation
systems from outside the space served (SOLAS 74/00/12/15
regs.II-2/4.4, 5.2, 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 6.2, 6.3, 7.5.5, 7.7, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 9.2.1,
9.2.3, 9.3, 9.4.2, 9.5, 9.7.1, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.5.2, 9.7.6, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4,
11.5, 19.3.8, 19.3.10, 20.2.1, 20.3 , 20-1.2.1, 20-1.3 and 20-1.4)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/42 to 44, 46 to 50 and 52);
(CA) 2.2.2.28 confirming that the means of escape from accommodation, machinery
and other spaces are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/13.2,
13.3.1, 13.3.3, 13.4.2 and 13.6) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/45);
(CA) 2.2.2.29 examining the arrangements for gaseous fuel for domestic purposes
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/51);
(CA) 2.2.2.30 examining visually the condition of any expansion joints in seawater
systems;
(CA) 2.2.2.32 confirming that no new materials containing asbestos were installed
on board* (SOLAS 74/00/04/09 reg.II-1/3-5);
(CA) 2.2.2.33 examining the functionality of bilge well alarms to all cargo holds and
conveyor tunnels (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/9);
(CA) 2.2.2.34 for bulk carriers, examining the hold, ballast and dry space water level
detectors and their audible and visual alarms. (SOLAS 74/02 reg.XII/12);
(CA) 2.2.2.35 for bulk carriers, checking the arrangements for availability of draining
and pumping systems forward of the collision bulkhead (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XII/13);
(CA) 2.2.2.36 confirming that the ship's identification number is permanently marked
(SOLAS 74/02 reg.XI-1/3);
(CA) 2.2.2.38 for single hull, single hold cargo ships, examining the cargo hold
water level detector and its audible and visual alarm (SOLAS 74/04
reg.II-1/23-3) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/25);
(CA) 2.2.2.39 confirming that the coating system in dedicated SWB tanks in ships and
double side skin spaces arranged in bulk carriers of 150 m in length and
upward when appropriate is maintained and that maintenance, repair
and partial recoating are recorded in the coating technical file
(SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CA) 2.2.2.40 confirming, for bulk carriers constructed before 1 July 1999 with
restrictions imposed with respect to the carriage of cargoes with a
density of 1,780 kg/m3 and above, that a triangle is permanently marked
at midship (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/8.3); and
(CA) 2.2.2.41 confirming, for bulk carriers, that the loading instrument is on board and
functioning (SOLAS 74/97/04 reg.XII/11).
(CA) 2.2.3 For the hull, * machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for oil tankers, the annual survey should consist of:
(CA) 2.2.3.1 confirming, when appropriate, that the requisite arrangements to regain
steering capability in the event of the prescribed single failure are being
maintained (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(CA) 2.2.3.2 examining the cargo tank openings, including gaskets, covers, coamings
and screens;
(CA) 2.2.3.3 examining the cargo tank pressure/vacuum valves and devices to
prevent the passage of flame (SOLAS 74/00/15 reg.II-2/11.6);
(CA) 2.2.3.4 examining the devices to prevent the passage of flame on vents to all
bunker, oily-ballast and oily-slop tanks and void spaces, as far as
practicable;
(CA) 2.2.3.5 examining the cargo tank venting, cargo tank purging and gas freeing
and other ventilation systems (SOLAS 74/00/15 regs.II-2/4.5.3, 4.5.4,
4.5.6 and 4.5.8) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/59);
(CA) 2.2.3.6 examining the cargo, crude oil washing, ballast and stripping systems
both on deck and in the cargo pump-rooms and the bunker system on
deck;
(CA) 2.2.3.7 confirming that all electrical equipment in dangerous zones is suitable
for such locations, is in good condition and is being properly maintained;
(CA) 2.2.3.8 confirming that potential sources of ignition in or near the cargo
pump-room are eliminated, such as loose gear, combustible materials,
etc., that there are no signs of undue leakage and that access ladders
are in good condition;
* Refer also to annex B to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys
of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CA) 2.2.3.9 examining all pump-room bulkheads for signs of oil leakage or fractures
and, in particular, the sealing arrangements of all penetrations of cargo
pump-room bulkheads;
(CA) 2.2.3.10 examining, as far as practicable, the cargo, bilge, ballast and stripping
pumps for undue gland seal leakage, verification of proper operation of
electrical and mechanical remote operating and shutdown devices and
operation of cargo pump-room bilge system, and checking that pump
foundations are intact;
(CA) 2.2.3.11 confirming that the pump-room ventilation system is operational, ducting
intact, dampers operational and screens clean;
(CA) 2.2.3.12 verifying that installed pressure gauges on cargo discharge lines and
level indicator systems are operational;
(CA) 2.2.3.14 examining the towing arrangement for tankers of not less
than 20,000 tonnes deadweight (SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.II-1/3-4);
(CA) 2.2.3.15 confirming that the corrosion prevention system fitted to dedicated
ballast water tanks of oil tankers and bulk carriers when appropriate is
maintained (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-1/3-2);
(CA) 2.2.3.16 confirming that the coating system in cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers,
when appropriate, is maintained and that in-service maintenance and
repair activities are recorded in the coating technical file (SOLAS 74/10
reg.II-1/3-11 and MSC.288(87), as amended);
(CA) 2.2.3.17 examining the emergency lighting in all cargo pump-rooms of tankers
constructed after 1 July 2002 (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-1/43); and
(CA) 2.2.3.18 examining, for oil tankers of 150 m in length and above, where
appropriate, the ship's structure in accordance with the Ship
Construction File, taking into account identified areas that need special
attention , and verifying that the Ship Construction File is updated, where
applicable* (SOLAS reg.II-1/3-10 and MSC.287(87)).
(CA) 2.2.4 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for chemical tankers and gas carriers, the
annual survey should consist of:
(CA) 2.2.4.1 the provisions of (CA) 2.2.3 except (CA) 2.2.3.16 and (CA) 2.2.3.18.
(CA) 2.2.5 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships concerning the
additional requirements for using natural gas as fuel other than ships
covered by the IGC Code, the annual survey should consist of:
* Refer to annex B to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys of
Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CA) 2.2.5.1 examining the log-books and operating records with regard to correct
functioning of the gas detection systems, fuel supply/gas systems, etc.
(IGF Code ch.16);
(CA) 2.2.5.3 confirming gas detection and other leakage detection equipment in
compartments containing fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply
equipment or components or associated systems, including indicators and
alarms, is in satisfactory operating condition (IGF Code chs.6 and 15);
(CA) 2.2.5.4 confirming the satisfactory operation of the control, monitoring and
automatic shutdown systems of the fuel supply and bunkering systems
(IGF Code ch.15);
(CA) 2.2.5.5 confirming the availability of test and calibration records of the gas
detection systems (IGF Code ch.15);
(CA) 2.2.5.6 examining piping, hoses, emergency shutdown valves, remote operating
valves, relief valves, machinery and equipment for fuel storage, fuel
bunkering, and fuel supply such as venting, compressing, refrigerating,
liquefying, heating, cooling or otherwise handling the fuel, means for
inerting (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 15);
(CA) 2.2.5.7 testing the shutdown of ESD protected machinery spaces operationally,
as far as practicable (IGF Code ch.5);
(CA) 2.2.5.10 testing, as far as practicable, alarms, such as differential pressure and
loss of pressure alarms (IGF Code ch.15);
(CA) 2.2.5.11 examining portable and fixed drip trays and insulation (IGF Code ch.5);
(CA) 2.2.5.13 examining the condition and arrangement of fuel storage, bunkering and
supply systems including external examination of storage tank (including
secondary barrier if fitted) and relief valves if accessible, verification of
satisfactory operation of tank monitoring system, examination and
testing of installed bilge alarms and means of drainage (IGF Code chs.6,
8 and 15);
(CA) 2.2.5.14 testing of the remote and local closing of the installed main tank valve
(IGF Code chs.6 and 10);
(CA) 2.2.5.15 examining bunkering stations and the fuel bunkering system including
operation of the fuel bunkering control, monitoring and shutdown
systems (IGF Code ch.8);
(CA) 2.2.5.16 examining the Ship-shore link (SSL) or equivalent means for automatic
and manual ESD communication to the bunkering source (IGF Code
para.8.5.7);
(CA) 2.2.5.17 examining the fuel supply system including the fuel supply system
control, monitoring and shutdown systems (IGF Code chs.9 and 15);
(CA) 2.2.5.18 testing of the remote and local closing of the master fuel valve for each
engine compartment (IGF Code chs.5, 9 and 15);
(CA) 2.2.5.19 checking the records about drills and emergency exercises
(IGF Code ch.17); and
(CA) 2.2.5.20 checking the pre-bunkering verification records according to the bunker
safety checklist (IGF Code ch.18).
(CA) 2.2.6 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the completion of
the annual survey should consist of:
(CA) 2.2.6.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate should be endorsed; and
(CA) 2.2.6.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(CIn) 2.3.1 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the examination
of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(CIn) 2.3.2 For the hull,* machinery and equipment of cargo ships the intermediate
survey should consist of:
(CIn) 2.3.2.2 for ships over 5 years of age, an internal examination of representative
spaces used for water ballast;
(CIn) 2.3.2.3 for ships over 10 years of age, other than gas carriers and ships
engaged in the carriage of dry cargoes only, an internal examination of
selected cargo spaces; and
* Refer also to annex A to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys
of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CIn) 2.3.2.4 for ships over 15 years of age, engaged in the carriage of dry cargoes
only, an internal examination of selected cargo spaces.
(CIn) 2.3.3 For the hull,* machinery and equipment of cargo ships for the additional
requirements for oil tankers the intermediate survey should consist of:
(CIn) 2.3.3.2 should there be any doubt as to its condition when examining the various
piping systems, the piping may be required to be pressure tested,
gauged or both; particular attention is to be paid to repairs such as
welded doublers; and
(CIn) 2.3.3.3 testing the insulation resistance of electrical circuits in dangerous zones
such as cargo pump-rooms and areas adjacent to cargo tanks, but in
cases where a proper record of testing is maintained, consideration
should be given to accepting recent readings.
(CIn) 2.3.4 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for chemical tankers and gas carriers, the
intermediate survey should consist of:
(CIn) 2.3.4.1 the provisions of (CA) 2.2.3 except (CA) 2.2.3.16 and (CA) 2.2.3.18.
(CIn) 2.3.5 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships concerning the
additional requirements for using natural gas as fuel other than ships
covered by the IGC Code, the intermediate survey should consist of:
(CIn) 2.3.5.2 testing gas detectors, temperature sensors, pressure sensors, level
indicators, and other arrangement of control, monitoring and safety of
fuel supply systems including proper response of the fuel safety system
upon fault conditions (IGF Code ch.15).
(CIn) 2.3.6 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the completion of
the intermediate survey should consist of:
(CIn) 2.3.6.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate should be endorsed; and
(CIn) 2.3.6.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(CR) 2.4.1 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships the examination
of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(CR) 2.4.1.1 the provisions of (CA) 2.2.1, except for the validity of the Cargo Ship
Safety Construction Certificate.
* Refer also to annex B to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys
of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CR) 2.4.2 For the hull, * machinery and equipment of cargo ships the renewal
survey should consist of:
(CR) 2.4.2.2 examination of sea valves and their connections to the hull; and
(CR) 2.4.2.3 examination of anchoring and mooring equipment, for which purpose the
anchors should be lowered and raised using the windlass.
(CR) 2.4.3 For the hull, † machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for oil tankers, the renewal survey should consist of:
(CR) 2.4.4 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for chemical tankers and gas carriers, the
renewal survey should consist of:
(CR) 2.4.4.1 the provisions of (CA) 2.2.3 except (CA) 2.2.3.16 and (CA) 2.2.3.18.
(CR) 2.4.5 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships, concerning the
additional requirements for bulk carriers the renewal survey should
consist of the provisions of (CI) 2.1.4.68 and 2.1.4.70.
(CR) 2.4.6 For the hull, machinery and equipment of cargo ships concerning the
additional requirements for ships using natural gas as fuel other than
ships covered by the IGC Code, the renewal survey should consist of:
(CR) 2.4.6.2 examining the storage tanks and all associated piping for fuel storage,
fuel bunkering, and fuel supply such as venting, compressing,
refrigerating, liquefying, heating, storing, burning or otherwise handling
the fuel and liquid nitrogen installations, and requiring removal of
insulation from the piping and opening for examination and hydrostatic
test of suspected pipeline as necessary, and leak test of complete piping
after reassembly (IGF Code chs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10);
(CR) 2.4.6.3 examining emergency shutdown valves, check valves, block and bleed
valves, master gas valves, remote operating valves, isolating valves for
pressure relief valves in the fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply
piping systems, with randomly selected valves being opened for
examination (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 7, 9, 15 and 16);
(CR) 2.4.6.4 examining pressure relief valves connected to fuel storage tanks and
connected pipes & venting system, with PRV being opened for
examination, adjusted and function tested (IGF Code ch.6);
* Refer also to annex A to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys
of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
† Refer also to annex B to the International Code on the Enhanced Programme of Inspections during Surveys
of Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, 2011 (resolution A.1049(27)), as amended.
(CR) 2.4.6.5 examining and testing pressure relief valves in fuel supply/bunker lines,
including valves being opened for internal examination and testing; the
number of valves being opened up for internal examination and being
tested should include all PRVs that were not internally examined and
tested in the past 5 years and a random selection of PRVs that were
internally examined and tested in the past 5 years provided satisfactory
records of overhaul and testing of these PRVs are available
(IGF Code ch.6);
(CR) 2.4.6.7 examining fuel storage tanks internally in accordance with an approved
survey plan (IGF Code ch.6);
(CR) 2.4.6.8 examining and testing of spill protection and water spray systems, for
portable liquefied gas fuel tanks located on open deck (IGF Code
para.6.5.2);
(CR) 2.4.6.9 examining and testing the thermal oxidation system if any (IGF Code
para.6.9.4);
(CR) 2.4.6.10 examining and NDE testing the low temperature steel shielding at the
bunker station if any (IGF Code para.8.3.1.6);
(CR) 2.4.6.11 examining fuel pumps, compressors, process pressure vessels, inert
gas generators, heat exchangers and other components used in
connection with fuel handling (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 15);
(CR) 2.4.6.13 examining and testing gas detectors, temperature sensors, pressure
sensors, level indicators, and other equipment providing input to the fuel
safety system, including verification of the response upon fault
conditions, and the calibrations of pressure, temperature and level
indicating equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's
requirements (IGF Code ch.15)*.
(CR) 2.4.7 After a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate should be issued.
(B) 3 GUIDELINES FOR THE INSPECTION OF THE OUTSIDE OF THE SHIP'S BOTTOM
OF CARGO SHIPS
(CB) 3.1 For the inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom of cargo ships the
inspection should consist of:
(CB) 3.1.1 examination of the ship's shell including bottom and bow plating, keel,
bilge keels, stem, stern frame and rudder;
(CB) 3.1.3 examination of the propeller and shaft seals, as far as practicable;
(CB) 3.1.4 noting the clearance measured in the propeller shafts, as far as
practicable;
(CB) 3.1.6 the survey of related items inspected at the same time (see part
"General" section 5.1).
(CB) 3.2 For the inspection of the outside of the ship's bottom of cargo ships the
completion of the inspection should consist of:
(CB) 3.2.1 after a satisfactory survey, the Cargo Ship Safety Construction
Certificate should be endorsed; and
(CB) 3.2.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General" section 4.8.
(R) 4 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE CARGO SHIP SAFETY RADIO
CERTIFICATE
(RI) 4.1.1 For the radio installations, including those used in life-saving appliances,
of cargo ships the examination of plans and designs should consist of:
(RI) 4.1.1.1 establishing the sea areas declared for operation, the equipment
installed to fulfil the functional requirements for the sea areas of
operation, the methods adopted to ensure the availability of the
functional requirements and the arrangements for supply of an
emergency source of energy (if any) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/43 and IV/1
to 15);
(RI) 4.1.1.3 confirming all SOLAS equipment complies with appropriate performance
standards not inferior to those adopted by IMO (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.1.4 examining the plans for the provision and position of the radio
installation, including sources of energy and antennas (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/43, IV/6, IV/14 and V/19); and
(RI) 4.1.1.5 examining the plans for the provision and positioning of the radio
life-saving appliances (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/6).
(RI) 4.1.2 For the radio installations, including radio life-saving appliances, of
cargo ships the survey during construction and after installation should
consist of:
(RI) 4.1.2.1 examining the position, physical and electromagnetic protection and
illumination of each radio installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/6);
(RI) 4.1.2.2 confirming the provision of equipment for the radio installation with due
regard to the declared sea areas in which the ship will trade and the
declared means of maintaining availability of functional requirements
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/6, IV/7 to 11, 14 and 15);
(RI) 4.1.2.3 confirming the ability to initiate the transmission of ship-to-shore distress
alerts by at least two separate and independent means, each using a
different radiocommunication service, from the position from which the
ship is normally navigated (SOLAS 74/88/06 regs.IV/4, 7 to 11);
(RI) 4.1.2.4.1 visually checking all antennas, including Inmarsat antennas, and feeders
for satisfactory siting and absence of defects (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.2.5.1 checking there is sufficient capacity to operate the basic or duplicated
equipment for 1 hour or 6 hours, as appropriate (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.5.2.1 checking its siting and installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.5.2.3 with the battery off charge, and the maximum required radio installation
load connected to the reserve source of energy, checking the battery
voltage and discharge current;
(RI) 4.1.2.5.2.4 checking that the charger(s) are capable of recharging the reserve
battery within 10 hours (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.5.2.5 checking that information of ship's position is provided continuously and
automatically to all two-way communication equipment
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/18);
(RI) 4.1.2.6.2 checking frequency tolerance, transmission line quality and radio
frequency power output (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.2.6.3 checking for correct operation of all controls including priority of control
units (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.2.6.4 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.6.5 checking the operation of the VHF control unit(s) or portable VHF
equipment provided for navigational safety (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/6);
(RI) 4.1.2.6.6 checking for correct operation by on-air contact with a coast station or
other ship;
(RI) 4.1.2.7 examining the VHF DSC controller and channel 70 Digital Selective
Calling (DSC) watch receiver, including:
(RI) 4.1.2.7.1 performing an off-air check confirming the correct Maritime Mobile
Service Identity is programmed in the equipment (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.2.7.2 checking for correct transmission by means of a routine or test call to a
coast station, other ship, onboard duplicate equipment or special test
equipment;
(RI) 4.1.2.7.3 checking for correct reception by means of a routine or test call from a
coast station, other ship, onboard duplicate equipment or special test
equipment;
(RI) 4.1.2.7.5 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.8.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.8.2 checking the antenna tuning in all appropriate bands;
(RI) 4.1.2.8.3 checking that the equipment is within frequency tolerance on all
appropriate bands (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.2.8.4 checking for correct operation by contact with a coast station and/or
measuring transmission line quality and radio frequency output;
(RI) 4.1.2.8.6 if control units are provided outside the navigating bridge, checking that
the control unit on the bridge has first priority for the purpose of initiating
distress alerts (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/9, 10, 11 and 14);
(RI) 4.1.2.9.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.9.2 confirming that the correct selective calling number is programmed in
the equipment;
(RI) 4.1.2.9.3 checking correct operation by inspection of recent hard copy or by a test
with a coast radio station (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/10 and 11);
(RI) 4.1.2.10.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(RI) 4.1.2.10.2 confirming that the correct Maritime Mobile Service Identity is
programmed in the equipment;
(RI) 4.1.2.11.1 confirming that only distress and safety DSC frequencies are being
monitored (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/9 to 12);
(RI) 4.1.2.11.2 checking that a continuous watch is being maintained while keying
MF/HF radio transmitters (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/12);
(RI) 4.1.2.11.3 checking for correct operation by means of a test call from a coast station
or other ship;
(RI) 4.1.2.12.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy, and that where
an uninterrupted supply of information from the ship's navigational or
other equipment is required ensuring such information remains available
in the event of failure of the ship's main or emergency source of electrical
power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/13 and 14);
(RI) 4.1.2.12.2 checking the distress function by means of an approved test procedure
where possible (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/10, 12 and 14);
(RI) 4.1.2.12.3 checking for correct operation by inspection of recent hard copy or by
test call;
(RI) 4.1.2.14 examining the Enhanced Group Call equipment (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/7
and 14), including:
(RI) 4.1.2.14.1 checking for correct operation and area by monitoring incoming
messages or by inspecting recent hard copy;
(RI) 4.1.2.15 if appropriate, examining the radio equipment for receipt of maritime
safety information by HF Narrow Band Direct Printing (NBDP)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/7, 12 and 14), including:
(RI) 4.1.2.16 examining the 406 MHz satellite Emergency Position Indicating Radio
Beacon (EPIRB) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/7 and 14), including:
(RI) 4.1.2.16.1 checking position and mounting for float free operation;
(RI) 4.1.2.16.4 checking that the unique beacon identification code is clearly marked on
the outside of the equipment and, where possible, decoding the unique
beacon identification code confirming it is correct;
(RI) 4.1.2.16.5 checking that the unique beacon identification code programmed in the
EPIRB corresponds with the unique beacon identification code assigned
by or on behalf of the Administration;
(RI) 4.1.2.16.6 checking that the MMSI number if encoded in the beacon corresponds
with the MMSI number assigned to the ship;
(RI) 4.1.2.16.8 if provided, checking the hydrostatic release and its expiry date;
(RI) 4.1.2.16.10 checking that the EPIRB has been subject to maintenance at intervals
not exceeding five years at an approved shore-based maintenance
facility (SOLAS 74/04 reg.IV/15.9);
(RI) 4.1.2.17 examining the two-way VHF radiotelephone apparatus (SOLAS 74/88
reg.III/6), including:
(RI) 4.1.2.17.1 checking for correct operation on Channel 16 and one other by testing
with another fixed or portable VHF installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(RI) 4.1.2.17.3 checking the expiry date of primary batteries where used;
(RI) 4.1.2.17.4 where appropriate, checking any fixed installation provided in a survival
craft;
(RI) 4.1.2.18 examining the search and rescue locating device(s) (SOLAS 74/88/08
regs.III/6, IV/7 and 14), including:
(RI) 4.1.2.19 examining the test equipment and spares carried to ensure carriage is
adequate in accordance with the sea areas in which the ship trades and
the declared options for maintaining availability of the functional
requirements (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/15).
(RI) 4.1.3 For the radio installations, including those used in life-saving appliances,
the check that documentation, etc., has been placed on board should
consist of:
(RI) 4.1.3.1 checking for a valid radio licence issued by the flag Administration
(ITU RR Article 24);
(RI) 4.1.3.2 checking the radio operator's certificates of competence (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/16 and ITU RR Article 56);
(RI) 4.1.3.3 checking the radio record (log) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/17 and ITU RR
App.11);
(RI) 4.1.3.4 checking the carriage of up-to-date ITU publications (ITU RR App.11);
(RI) 4.1.3.5 checking the carriage of operating manuals for all equipment
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/15); and
(RI) 4.1.3.6 checking the carriage of service manuals for all equipment when at-sea
maintenance is the declared option (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/15).
(RI) 4.1.4 For the radio installations, including those used in life-saving appliances,
of cargo ships the completion of the initial survey should consist of:
(RI) 4.1.4.1 the surveyor preparing and forwarding a survey report, indicating clearly
the organization he or she represents, to the relevant authorities,
detailing results of the survey and recording omissions and deficiencies,
if satisfied, the relevant authorities should issue a Cargo Ship Safety
Radio Certificate and the associated Record of Equipment (form R).
(RP) 4.2.1 For radio installations, including radio life-saving appliances, on cargo
ships the examination of current certificates and other records should
consist of:
(RP) 4.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.2 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.3 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(RP) 4.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.6 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.7 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(RP) 4.2.1.8 checking, where appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(RP) 4.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(RP) 4.2.1.10 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(RP) 4.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.12 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.13 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(RP) 4.2.1.14 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*
(RP) 4.2.1.16 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.17 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/88 reg.V/13(b));
(RP) 4.2.1.18 checking that adequate information is on board to enable the equipment
to be properly operated and maintained;
(RP) 4.2.1.19 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(RP) 4.2.1.20 confirming that any new equipment has been properly approved before
installation and that no changes have been made such as would affect
the validity of the certificate;
(RP) 4.2.1.21 confirming that a record has been kept in the period since the last survey
to the satisfaction of the Administration and as required by the Radio
Regulations (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/17);
(RP) 4.2.1.22 checking documentary evidence that the actual capacity of the battery
has been proved in port within the last 12 months (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/13);
(RP) 4.2.1.23 confirming that the provisions of (RI) 4.1.3 have been met;
(RP) 4.2.1.24 checking that the annual test has been carried out for the Satellite EPIRB
and, if applicable, shore-based maintenance has been carried out at
intervals not exceeding five years (SOLAS 74/04 reg.IV/15); and
(RP) 4.2.2 For radio installations, including radio life-saving appliances, of cargo
ships the periodical survey should consist of:
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(RP) 4.2.3 For radio installations, including those used in radio life-saving
appliances, of cargo ships the completion of the periodical survey should
consist of:
(RP) 4.2.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the Cargo Ship Safety Radio
Certificate; and
RP) 4.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General" section 4.8.
(RR) 4.3.1 For the radio installations, including those used in life-saving appliances,
of cargo ships the examination of current certificates and other records
should consist of:
(RR) 4.3.1.1 the provisions of (RP) 4.2.1, except for the validity of the Cargo Ship
Safety Radio Certificate.
(RR) 4.3.2 For the radio installations, including those used in radio life-saving
appliances, of cargo ships the renewal survey should consist of:
(RR) 4.3.3 For the radio installations, including those used in radio life-saving
appliances, on cargo ships the completion of the renewal survey should
consist of:
(RR) 4.3.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the Cargo Ship Safety Radio
Certificate as per the provisions of (RI) 4.1.4.
(PI) 5.1.1 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the
examination of plans and designs should consist of:
(PI) 5.1.1.1 examining the subdivision and stability (SOLAS 74/88/95 regs.II-1/4
to 8, 8-1, 8-2, 8-3, 13 and 16) (SOLAS 74/06/08 regs.II-1/5 to 8-1, 14
and 18; IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3) (SOLAS 74/12 regs.II-1/8-1);
(PI) 5.1.1.3 examining the arrangement of the bulkheads, their construction and the
openings therein, including the disposition and means of operation of the
watertight doors (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/10, 14, and 15) (SOLAS 74/06
regs.II-1/10, 11 12 and 13);
(PI) 5.1.1.4 examining the arrangement of the double bottoms (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/12) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/9);
(PI) 5.1.1.5 examining the arrangements for the openings in the shell plating below
the margin line or the bulkhead deck as applicable, the construction of
the watertight doors, sidescuttles, watertight decks, trunks, etc., and the
watertight integrity above the margin line or the bulkhead deck as
applicable (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/17, 18, 19 and 20) (SOLAS 74/06
regs.II-1/15, 16, 16-1 and 17);
(PI) 5.1.1.6 examining the plans for the bilge pumping and drainage systems
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/21 and 39) (SOLAS 74/05/09 reg.II-1/35-1 and
SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/20.6.1.4);
(PI) 5.1.1.7 examining, when appropriate, the means of indicating the status of any
bow doors and the leakage therefrom (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/23-2)
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/17-1);
(PI) 5.1.1.8 examining the plans for the machinery installation (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/26 to 36 and 54);
(PI) 5.1.1.9 examining the plans for the electrical installation (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/39, 40, 41, 42, 44 and 45);
(PI) 5.1.1.11 examining, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/06/15 regs.II-1/55,
II-2/17 and III/38 and IGF Code ch.2);
(PI) 5.1.1.12 examining the plans for the fire pumps, including the emergency fire
pump * if applicable, fire mains, hydrants, hoses and nozzles and the
international shore connection (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/39 and
SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.2; FSS Code chs.2 and 12) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/39 and regs.II-2/4 and 19);
(PI) 5.1.1.13 examining the plans for the fire-extinguishing arrangements in the
machinery spaces (SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/10.4 and 10.5; FSS
Code chs.5, 6 and 7) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/7);
(PI) 5.1.1.14 checking the provision and specification of the fire extinguishers and the
fire-fighters' outfits including their self-contained compressed air
breathing apparatus, and provision of two-way portable radiotelephone
apparatus of an explosion-proof type or intrinsically safe (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/6 and 17) (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.II-2/10.10);
(PI) 5.1.1.15 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, checking the
provision of a suitably located means for fully recharging breathing air
cylinders (SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/10.10.2);
(PI) 5.1.1.16 examining the plans for the fire-extinguishing and special arrangements
in the machinery spaces (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/39 and regs.II-2/7
and 11);
(PI) 5.1.1.17 examining the arrangements for oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/15);
(PI) 5.1.1.18 examining the plans for the structural fire protection, including the means
of escape (SOLAS 74/00/12/15 regs.II-2/4.4.4, 5.2, 5.3, 7.5, 7.8.2, 8.4,
* Refer to the Unified interpretation of chapter 12 of the International Code for fire safety systems
(MSC.1/Circ.1388).
8.5, 9, 10.6, 11, 13, 17, 20 and 20-1; FSS Code ch.13, sections 1 and 2)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/23 to 36);
(PI) 5.1.1.19 examining the plans for the protection of special category spaces and
other cargo spaces (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/37, 38 and 39)
(SOLAS 74/00/06/10/15 regs.II-2/ 7.6, 9, 10.7.1, 10.7.2 and 20; FSS
Code chs.9 and 10);
(PI) 5.1.1.20 examining the plans for the fire protection arrangements for passenger
ships designed to carry containers on or above the weather deck, as
applicable, including the water mist lance (SOLAS 74/00/14
reg.II 2/10.7.3);
(PI) 5.1.1.21 examining the plans for the fixed fire detection and alarm system, and
any automatic sprinkler, fire detection and fire alarm system, as
applicable, in machinery spaces, including enclosed spaces containing
incinerators, accommodation and service spaces and control spaces
(SOLAS 74/00/06/10 reg.II-2/7 (except 7.5.5, 7.6 and 7.9); FSS Code
chs.8, 9 and 10) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/40);
(PI) 5.1.1.22 examining the plans for the crew alarm and the public address system
or other effective means of communication (SOLAS 74/00/06
reg.II-2/7.9; FSS Code ch.9; LSA Code ch.7) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/40);
(PI) 5.1.1.23 examining the plans for the special arrangements for the carriage of
dangerous goods, when appropriate, including water supplies, electrical
equipment and wiring, fire detection sample extraction smoke detection
system, bilge pumping and personnel protection (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/41 and 54) (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19; FSS Code chs.9
and 10);
(PI) 5.1.1.24 examining the provision and disposition of the survival craft and rescue
boats and the arrangements for mustering passengers (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/11 to 17, 21 and 24);
(PI) 5.1.1.25 examining the design of the survival craft, including their construction,
equipment, fittings, release mechanisms and recovery appliances and
embarkation and launching arrangements (SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/ 20
to 24, 36, 38 to 44 and 48) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.III/4) (LSA Code
sections 3.2, 4.1 to 4.6, 6.1 to 6.2);
(PI) 5.1.1.26 examining the design of the rescue boats, including their equipment and
launching and recovery appliances and arrangements (SOLAS 74/88
regs.III/16, 20, 47 and 48);
(PI) 5.1.1.27 examining the provision, specification and stowage of two-way VHF
radiotelephone apparatus and search and rescue locating devices
(SOLAS 74/88/08 reg.III/6.2.2);
(PI) 5.1.1.28 examining the provision, specification and stowage of the distress flares
and the line-throwing appliance and the provision of onboard
communications equipment and the general alarm system
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/6, 17, 35, 49 and 50);
(PI) 5.1.1.29 examining the provision, specification and stowage of the lifebuoys,
including those fitted with self-igniting lights, self-activating smoke
signals and buoyant lines, lifejackets, immersion suits and thermal
protective aids (SOLAS 74/88/06 regs.III/7, 21, 22 and 26);
(PI) 5.1.1.30 examining the plans for the lighting of the muster and embarkation
stations and the alleyways, stairways and exits giving access to the
muster and embarkation stations, including the supply from the
emergency source of power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/42 and III/11);
(PI) 5.1.1.31 examining the plans for the positioning of, and the specification for, the
navigation lights, shapes and sound signalling equipment
(COLREG 1972, rules 20 to 24, 27 to 30 and 33);
(PI) 5.1.1.32 examining the plans relating to the bridge design and arrangement of
navigational systems and equipment and bridge procedures
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/15);
(PI) 5.1.1.33 checking the provision and specification of the following navigation
equipment as appropriate: daylight signalling lamp, magnetic compass,
transmitting heading device, gyro compass, gyro compass repeaters,
radar installation(s), automatic identification system, electronic plotting
aid, automatic tracking aid(s) or automatic radar plotting aid(s),
echo-sounding device, speed and distance indicator, rudder angle
indicator, propeller rate of revolution indicator, variable pitch propeller
pitch and operational mode indicator, rate-of-turn indicator, heading or
track control system, GNSS receiver, terrestrial radio navigation system
and sound reception system, a pelorus or compass bearing device,
means for correcting heading and bearings, a BNWAS as applicable and
ECDIS including backup arrangements as applicable
(SOLAS 74/00/09/13 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.1.34 checking the provision and specification of the voyage data recorder
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/20);
(PI) 5.1.1.36 checking for the provision and specification of the long-range
identification and tracking system (SOLAS 74/04 reg.V/19-1);
(PI) 5.1.1.37 checking the plans and specification of the pilot transfer arrangement,
the pilot ladders, the combination arrangements, where applicable, the
access to the ship's deck and the associated equipment and lighting and
pilot transfer arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/10 reg.V/23);
(PI) 5.1.1.38 establishing the sea areas declared for operation, the equipment
installed to fulfil the functional requirements for the sea areas of
operation, the methods adopted to ensure the availability of the
functional requirements and the arrangements for supply of an
emergency source of energy (if any) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/42
and IV/1 to 15);
(PI) 5.1.1.40 confirming that all SOLAS equipment complies with appropriate
performance standards not inferior to those adopted by IMO
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.1.41 examining the plans for the provision and positioning of the radio
installation including sources of energy and antennas (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/42, IV/6 and 14);
(PI) 5.1.1.42 examining the plans for the provision and positioning of the radio
life-saving appliances (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/6);
(PI) 5.1.1.43 if applicable, checking that a list of all limitations on the operation of a
passenger ship is kept on board and updated;
(PI) 5.1.1.44 checking the provision of means of embarkation and disembarkation from
ships for use in port and in port-related operations, such as gangways and
accommodation ladders (SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-1/3-9);
(PI) 5.1.1.46 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, checking the
provision of a safety centre (SOLAS 74 reg.II-2/23) and associated
ventilation requirements (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/8.2);
(PI) 5.1.1.47 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010 and having a
length of 120 m or more or having three or more main vertical zones,
confirming that design criteria for the ship's safe return to port and for
systems to remain operational after a fire casualty have been documented
and that safe areas have been designated (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-2/21
and 22); and
(PI) 5.1.1.48 where applicable, examining the Cargo Securing Manual for ships
carrying cargoes other than solid and liquid bulk cargoes, cargo units
and cargo transport units (SOLAS 74/98/02 reg.VI/5.6).
(PI) 5.1.2 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships, concerning
the examination of plans and designs additional requirements for the
passenger ships using natural gas as fuel other than ships covered by
the IGC Code should consist of:
(PI) 5.1.2.1 examining the plans for the fuel containment systems, control of vapour
space of the liquefied gas fuel tanks, vapour detection, gauging, loading
limits for the liquefied gas fuel tanks and other special requirements
(IGF Code chs.5, 6, 7, 8 and 15));
(PI) 5.1.2.2 examining the plans for the ship arrangements (IGF Code ch.5);
(PI) 5.1.2.3 examining the plans for piping systems (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 7 and 9);
(PI) 5.1.2.4 examining the plans for the pressure control (IGF Code ch.6);
(PI) 5.1.2.5 examining the plans for the environmental control (IGF Code ch.6);
(PI) 5.1.2.6 examining the plans for machinery installation (IGF Code ch.10);
(PI) 5.1.2.7 examining the plans for fire protection and fire extinction equipment
(IGF Code ch.11);
(PI) 5.1.2.8 examining the plans, for the fire detection and alarm system and
fire-fighting arrangements (IGF Code paras. 11.4, 11.5, 11.6 and 11.7);
(PI) 5.1.2.9 examining the plans for the ventilation systems (IGF Code chs.12
and 13);
(PI) 5.1.2.10 examining the plans for the electrical installations (IGF Code chs.12
and 14); and
(PI) 5.1.2.11 examining the plans for the control, monitoring and safety systems
(IGF Code ch.15).
(PI) 5.1.3 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the survey
during construction and after installation should consist of:
(PI) 5.1.3.1 examining the outside of the ship's bottom, including the bottom and bow
plating, keel, bilge keels, stem, stern frame, the rudder, sea chests and
strainers (SOLAS 74/88 reg.I/7(b)(i));
(PI) 5.1.3.2 confirming the arrangements on which the calculations for subdivision and
stability are based, and checking the subdivision load lines
(SOLAS 74/88 /95 regs.II-1/4 to 8, 13 and 16) (SOLAS 74/06/08
regs.II 1/6, 7, 7-1, 7-2, 7-3, 8, 9,14, 18) (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/8-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.3 confirming the provision of operational information to the master for safe
return to port after a flooding casualty by onboard stability computer or
shore-based support (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/8-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.5 confirming that dedicated seawater ballast tanks have an approved
coating system when appropriate (SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(PI) 5.1.3.6 confirming the arrangement of the bulkheads, their construction and
the openings therein, confirming that the collision bulkhead is
watertight up to the freeboard deck, that the valves fitted on the pipes
piercing the collision bulkhead are operable from above the freeboard
deck and that there are no doors, manholes, ventilation ducts or any
other openings, confirming that the other bulkheads, as required for the
ship's subdivision, are watertight up to the bulkhead deck and
confirming the construction of the watertight doors and that they have
been tested (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/10, 14, 15 and 18) (SOLAS 74/06
regs.II-1/10, 11, 12, 13 and 16);
(PI) 5.1.3.7 confirming that the watertight integrity has been maintained where pipes,
scuppers, etc., pass through subdivision watertight bulkheads
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.8 confirming that a diagram is provided on the navigating bridge showing
the location of the watertight doors together with indicators showing
whether the doors are open or closed and confirming that the watertight
doors and their means of operation have been installed in accordance
with the approved plans (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06
reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.9 testing the operation of the watertight doors both from the navigating
bridge in the event of an emergency and locally at the door itself
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13) and, in particular,
that they are:
(PI) 5.1.3.9.2 provided with devices giving an indication of whether the door is open or
closed at all remote operating positions;
(PI) 5.1.3.9.3 provided with an audible alarm that is distinct from any other alarm in the
area and, when appropriate, an intermittent visual signal;
(PI) 5.1.3.9.4 provided with control handles on each side of the bulkhead so that a
person may hold both handles in the open position and pass safely
through the watertight door without accidentally setting the power
closing mechanism into operation;
(PI) 5.1.3.10 testing the remote hand-operation to close the power-operated sliding
watertight door from an accessible position above the bulkhead deck
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.11 confirming that the watertight doors and their indicating devices are
operable in the event of a failure of the main and emergency sources of
power (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.12 checking, when appropriate, any watertight doors, that are not required
to be closed remotely and are fitted in watertight bulkheads dividing
'tween deck spaces, and confirming that a notice is affixed concerning
their closure (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.13 confirming that a notice is affixed to any portable plates on bulkheads in
machinery spaces concerning their closure and, if appropriate, testing
any power-operated watertight door fitted in lieu (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.14 confirming the arrangements for closing sidescuttles and their
deadlights, also scuppers, sanitary discharges and similar openings and
other inlets and discharges in the shell plating below the bulkhead deck
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(PI) 5.1.3.15 confirming that valves for closing the main and auxiliary sea inlets and
discharges in the machinery spaces are readily accessible and
indicators showing the status of the valves are provided (SOLAS 74/06
reg.II-1/15);
(PI) 5.1.3.16 confirming that gangway, cargo and fuelling ports fitted below the
bulkhead deck can be effectively closed and that the inboard end of any
ash or rubbish chutes are fitted with an effective cover (SOLAS 74/06
reg.II-1/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.17 confirming by a hose or flooding test the watertightness of watertight
decks and trunks, tunnels and ventilators (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/19)
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/16-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.18 confirming the arrangements to maintain the watertight integrity above
the bulkhead deck (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/17 and 17-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.19 confirming the arrangements for the bilge pumping and that each bilge
pump and the bilge pumping system provided for each watertight
compartment is working efficiently (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21)
(SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.20 confirming that the drainage system of enclosed cargo spaces situated
on the freeboard deck is working efficiently (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21)
(SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.20.1 examining visually the drainage facilities for blockage or other damage
and confirming the provision of means to prevent blockage of drainage
arrangements, for closed vehicle and ro-ro spaces and special category
spaces where fixed pressure water-spraying systems are used
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/20.6.1.5);
(PI) 5.1.3.21 conducting an inclining test (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/22) (SOLAS 74/06
reg.II-1/5);
(PI) 5.1.3.22 checking, when appropriate, the means of indicating the status of any
bow doors and any leakage therefrom (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/23-2)
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/17-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.23 confirming that the arrangement for monitoring special category spaces
or ro-ro spaces, when fitted, is satisfactory (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/23);
(PI) 5.1.3.24 confirming that the machinery, boilers and other pressure vessels,
associated piping systems and fittings are installed and protected so as
to reduce to a minimum any danger to persons on board, due regard
being given to moving parts, hot surfaces and other hazards
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(PI) 5.1.3.25 confirming that the normal operation of the propulsion machinery can be
sustained or restored even though one of the essential auxiliaries
becomes inoperative (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(PI) 5.1.3.26 confirming that means are provided so that the machinery can be
brought into operation from the dead ship condition without external aid
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(PI) 5.1.3.27 confirming that the boilers, all parts of the machinery, all steam,
hydraulic, pneumatic and other systems and their associated fittings
which are under internal pressure have been subjected to the
appropriate tests, including a pressure test (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(PI) 5.1.3.28 confirming that means are provided to ensure that the safe speed is not
exceeded where there is the risk of machinery overspeeding
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PI) 5.1.3.29 confirming that, where practicable, means are provided to protect
against overpressure in the parts of main, auxiliary and other machinery
that are subject to internal pressure and may be subject to dangerous
overpressure (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PI) 5.1.3.30 confirming that, when required, crankcase explosion relief devices are
fitted to internal combustion engines and that they are arranged so as to
minimize the possibility of injury to personnel (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PI) 5.1.3.31 confirming that main turbine propulsion machinery and, where
applicable, main internal combustion propulsion machinery and auxiliary
machinery are provided with automatic shut-off arrangements in the
case of failures, such as lubricating oil supply failure, which could rapidly
lead to a complete breakdown, serious damage or explosion
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PI) 5.1.3.32 confirming and recording the ability of the machinery to reverse
the direction of the thrust of the propeller in sufficient time and to
bring the ship to rest within a reasonable distance, including the
effectiveness of any supplementary means of manoeuvring or stopping
the ship* (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/28);
(PI) 5.1.3.33 confirming that the main and auxiliary steering gear are so arranged that
the failure of one of them does not render the other inoperative †
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.34 confirming that, where appropriate, essential components of the steering
gear are permanently lubricated or provided with lubrication fittings
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.35 confirming that relief valves are fitted to any part of a steering gear
hydraulic system which can be isolated and in which pressure can be
generated from the power source or from external forces and that these
relief valves are set to a pressure not exceeding the design pressure
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
PI) 5.1.3.36 confirming that the main steering gear is capable of steering the ship at
maximum ahead service speed and is capable of putting the rudder over
from 35° on one side to 35° on the other side with the ship at its deepest
seagoing draught and running ahead at maximum ahead service speed
and, under the same conditions, from 35° on either side to 30° on the
* For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, 29 and 30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
† For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, 29 and 30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
other side in not more than 28 s,* or, where demonstration at the deepest
seagoing draught is impracticable, with an alternative permissible sea
trial loading condition† (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.37 confirming that the auxiliary steering gear is capable of steering the ship
at navigable speed and of being brought speedily into action in an
emergency and that it is capable of putting the rudder over from 15° on
one side to 15° on the other side in not more than 60 s with the ship at
its deepest seagoing draught and running ahead at one half of the
maximum ahead service speed or 7 knots, whichever is the greater,‡ or,
where this is impracticable, with an alternative permissible sea trial
loading condition§ (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.38 confirming that the main or auxiliary steering gear power units restart
automatically when power is restored after a power failure, that they are
capable of being brought into operation from a position on the navigating
bridge and that, in the event of a power failure to any one of the steering
gear power units, an audible and visual alarm is given on the navigating
bridge (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.39 confirming that, where the main steering gear comprises two or more
identical power units and an auxiliary steering gear is not fitted, a defect
can be isolated so that steering capability can be maintained or speedily
regained after a single failure in its piping system or in one of the power
units* (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.40 confirming that the control systems for the main steering gear from both
the navigating bridge and the steering gear compartment are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.41 confirming that, where the main steering gear comprises two or more
identical power units and an auxiliary steering gear is not fitted, the two
independent control systems from the navigating bridge are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.42 confirming that the control system for the auxiliary steering gear, in the
steering gear compartment and, if this gear is power-operated, from the
navigating bridge, is operating satisfactorily and that the latter is
independent of the control system for the main steering gear
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.43 confirming that the control system for any main and auxiliary steering
gear control system operable from the navigating bridge is capable of
being brought into operation from a position on the navigating bridge,
* For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, 29 and 30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
† Refer to the Unified interpretations of SOLAS regulations II-1/29.3 and II-1/29.4 (MSC.1/Circ.1536).
‡ For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, 29 and 30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
§ Refer to the Unified interpretations of SOLAS regulations II-1/29.3 and II-1/29.4 (MSC.1/Circ.1536).
(PI) 5.1.3.44 confirming that the electric power circuits and steering gear control
system, together with their associated components, cables and pipes,
are separated, as far as practicable, throughout their length
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.45 confirming that the means of communication between the bridge and the
steering gear is operating satisfactorily and that, with ships having
emergency steering positions, a telephone or other means of
communication for relaying heading information and supplying visual
compass readings to the emergency steering position are provided
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29) (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.3.46 confirming that the angular position of the rudder is indicated
independently of the steering control system on the navigating bridge if
the main steering gear is power-operated and that this angular position
is given in the steering gear compartment (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29)
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.3.47 confirming that with a hydraulic power-operated steering gear the
audible and visual low-level alarms on the navigating bridge and in the
machinery space for each hydraulic fluid reservoir are operating
satisfactorily and that at least one power actuating system including the
reservoir can be recharged from a position within the steering gear
compartment by means of a fixed storage tank to which a contents
gauge is fitted with fixed piping (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.48 confirming that the steering gear compartment is readily accessible, that
it is separated, as far as practicable, from machinery spaces and is
provided with suitable arrangements to ensure working access to
steering gear machinery and controls under safe conditions
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PI) 5.1.3.49 confirming that with electric and electro-hydraulic steering gear, the
means for indicating, on the navigating bridge and at a main machinery
control position, that the motors are running and that the overload alarm
and alarm for the loss of a phase in a three-phase supply located at the
main machinery control position are operating satisfactorily
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/30);
(PI) 5.1.3.50 confirming that the main and auxiliary machinery essential for propulsion
and the safety of the ship are provided with the effective means for its
operation and control (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(PI) 5.1.3.51 confirming that appropriate means are provided where it is intended that
the propulsion machinery should be remotely controlled from the
navigating bridge, including, where necessary, the control, monitoring,
reporting, alert and safety actions (SOLAS 74/00/02 reg.II-1/31);
(PI) 5.1.3.52 confirming that arrangements to operate main and other machinery from
a machinery control room are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(PI) 5.1.3.53 confirming that, in general, means are provided for manually overriding
automatic controls and that a failure does not prevent the use of the
manual override (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(PI) 5.1.3.54 confirming that oil-fired and exhaust gas boilers, unfired steam
generators, steam pipe systems and air pressure systems are fitted with
the appropriate safety features (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-I/32, 33 and 34);
(PI) 5.1.3.55 confirming the operation of the ventilation for the machinery spaces
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-I/35);
(PI) 5.1.3.56 when appropriate, confirming that the measures to prevent noise in
machinery spaces are effective (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-I/36 and
SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12.2); or confirming that the ship was
constructed to reduce onboard noise and to protect personnel from noise
in accordance with the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships, adopted
by resolution MSC.337(91), as amended (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(PI) 5.1.3.57 confirming that the engine-room telegraph giving visual indication of the
orders and answers both in the machinery space and on the navigating
bridge is operating satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88 regulation II-1/37);
(PI) 5.1.3.60 confirming that precautions, taken to prevent any oil that may escape
under pressure from any pump, filter or heater from coming into contact
with heated surfaces, are efficient;
(PI) 5.1.3.61 confirming that the means of ascertaining the amount of oil contained in
any oil tank are in satisfactory working condition (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/15) (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.5);
(PI) 5.1.3.62 confirming that the devices provided to prevent overpressure in any oil
tank or in any part of the oil system, including the filling pipes, are in
satisfactory working condition (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/15) (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/4.2.2.4);
(PI) 5.1.3.63 confirming that forepeak tanks are not intended for carriage of oil fuel,
lubrication oil and other flammable oils;
(PI) 5.1.3.64 confirming that the electrical installations, including the main source of
power and lighting systems, are installed in accordance with the
approved plans (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/40 and 41);
(PI) 5.1.3.66 confirming that the starting arrangements of each emergency generating
set are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/44);
(PI) 5.1.3.67 checking, when appropriate, the disposition of, and testing, the
supplementary emergency lighting (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/42-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.67.1 for passenger ships, constructed on or after 1 July 2010, confirming
provision of supplementary lighting in all cabins, and checking that such
lighting automatically illuminates and remains on for a minimum
of 30 min when power to the normal cabin lighting is lost
(SOLAS 74/06/10 reg.II-1/41.6);
(PI) 5.1.3.67.2 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, checking
the provision of smoke detectors in cabins, which, when activated, are
capable of emitting, or cause to be emitted, an audible alarm within the
space where they are located (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-2/7.5.2 and 7.5.3.1);
(PI) 5.1.3.68 confirming that precautions have been provided against shock, fire and
other hazards of electrical origin (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/45);
(PI) 5.1.3.69 confirming, when appropriate, that the arrangements for the machinery
spaces being periodically unattended are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/54);
(PI) 5.1.3.70 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
for machinery or electrical installations, low-flashpoint fuel storage and
distribution systems, fire safety, or life-saving appliances and
arrangements, in accordance with the test and inspection requirements,
if any, specified in the approved documentation (SOLAS 74/00/06/15
regs.II-1/55, II-2/17 and III/38 and IGF Code ch.2);
(PI) 5.1.3.71 examining the fire pumps and fire main and the disposition of the hydrants,
hoses and nozzles and the international shore connection and checking
that each fire pump, including the emergency fire pump, can be operated
separately so that two jets of water are produced simultaneously from
different hydrants at any part of the ship while the required pressure is
maintained in the fire main and testing that the emergency fire pump,
if applicable, has the required capacity, and, if the emergency fire pump is
the main supply of water for any fixed fire-extinguishing system, checking
that the emergency fire pump has the capacity for this system *
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/4 and 19; SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.2; FSS
Code chs.2 and 12);
(PI) 5.1.3.72 for passenger ships designed to carry containers on or above the
weather deck, as applicable, examining the water mist lance
(SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.7.3);
(PI) 5.1.3.73 examining the provision and disposition of the fire extinguishers
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.3; FSS Code ch.4) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/17);
* Refer to the Unified interpretation of chapter 12 of the International Code for Fire Safety Systems
(MSC.1/Circ.1388).
(PI) 5.1.3.76 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the machinery, cargo, special
category and vehicle spaces, as appropriate, and confirming that the
installation tests have been satisfactorily completed and that its means of
operation are clearly marked (SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/10.4, 10.5,
10.7.1, 10.7.2 and 20.6.1; FSS Code ch.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/7
and 53);
(PI) 5.1.3.78 checking that fixed carbon dioxide fire-extinguishing systems for the
protection of machinery spaces, where applicable, are provided with two
separate controls, one for opening of the gas piping and one for
discharging the gas from the storage container, each of them located in
a release box clearly identified for the particular space (SOLAS 74/08
reg.II-2/10.4; FSS Code ch.5.2.2.2);
(PI) 5.1.3.79 examining the arrangements for oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils and testing the remote closing of valves for oil fuel,
lubricating oil and other flammable oils and the operation of the remote
means of closing the valves on the tanks that contain oil fuel, lubricating
oil and other flammable oils (SOLAS 74/88/06 reg.II-2/15) (SOLAS
74/00/15 reg.II-2/4.2);
(PI) 5.1.3.80 examining any fire detection and alarm system and confirming
that installation tests have been satisfactorily completed (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/11, 12, 13, 14, 36 and 41);
(PI) 5.1.3.81 confirming that all aspects of installation of the structural fire protection,
including the structure, fire integrity, protection of stairways and lifts,
cabin balconies, openings in "A" and "B" Class divisions, ventilation
(PI) 5.1.3.82 testing any manual and automatic fire doors, including the means of
closing the openings in "A" and "B" Class divisions (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/30 and 31);
(PI) 5.1.3.83 testing the means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all ventilation
smoke extraction systems and proving that the power ventilation is
capable of being stopped from outside the space served (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/32);
(PI) 5.1.3.84 confirming that stairways and ladders are so arranged as to provide a
means of escape to the lifeboat and liferaft and liferaft embarkation deck
from all passenger and crew spaces and from those spaces in which the
crew is normally employed (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II- 2/13.7) and in particular
that:
(PI) 5.1.3.84.1 below the bulkhead deck there are two means of escape from each
watertight compartment, one being independent of watertight doors;
(PI) 5.1.3.84.2 above the bulkhead deck there are two means of escape from each
vertical zone or similar such area, one leading directly to a stairway
forming a vertical escape;
(PI) 5.1.3.84.3 the radiotelegraph station, if provided, has direct access to the open
deck or is provided with two means of access or egress, one of which is
a porthole or window of sufficient size;
(PI) 5.1.3.85 confirming that the means of escape from any special category spaces
are generally in accordance with (PI) 5.1.3.84 (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/28);
(PI) 5.1.3.86 confirming that in the machinery spaces there are two widely separated
means of escape leading to the lifeboat and liferaft embarkation decks,
including, when from a space below the bulkhead deck, a continuous fire
shelter, and that two means of escape are provided for the main workshop
located within the machinery space, as applicable (SOLAS 74/00/14
reg.II-2/13.4.1; FSS Code chapter 13) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/28);
(PI) 5.1.3.87 confirming the fire protection arrangements, including fire detection and
sample extraction smoke detection systems for cargo spaces for cargo
and dangerous goods and testing, as appropriate, the operation of the
means for closing the various openings (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/39)
(SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/7.6, 10.7.1 and 10.7.2; FSS Code chs.5, 9
and 10);
(PI) 5.1.3.88 confirming the fire protection arrangements, including fire detection and
sample extraction smoke detection systems, where applicable for
vehicle, special category and ro-ro spaces and testing, as appropriate,
the operation of the means for closing the various openings
(PI) 5.1.3.89 confirming and testing, as appropriate, any fixed fire detection and alarm
system, and any automatic sprinkler, fire detection and fire alarm system,
as applicable, in machinery spaces, including enclosed spaces containing
incinerators, accommodation, service and control spaces (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/40) (SOLAS 74/00/06/10 reg.II-2/7 (except 7.5.5, 7.6 and 7.9); FSS
Code chs.8 and 9);
(PI) 5.1.3.90 confirming and testing the special alarm and the public address system or
other effective means of communication (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/40)
(SOLAS 74/00/06/10 reg.II-2/12; LSA Code ch.7);
(PI) 5.1.3.91 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, confirming the
provision of a fixed fire detection and fire alarm system for passenger
ships capable of remotely and individually identifying each detector and
manually operated call point (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/7.2.4);
(PI) 5.1.3.92 examining, when appropriate, the special arrangements for carrying
dangerous goods, including checking the electrical equipment and
wiring, fire detection, ventilation and boundary insulation, the provision
of protective clothing and portable appliances and the testing of the
water supply, bilge pumping and any water spray system (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/41 and 54) (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19);
(PI) 5.1.3.93 checking the provision and disposition of the survival craft and rescue
boats and the arrangements for mustering passengers (SOLAS 74/88
regs III/11 to 16, 20 and 24);
(PI) 5.1.3.94 examining each survival craft, including its equipment, and that the
required number of search and rescue locating devices are fitted in
liferafts and those liferafts are clearly marked (SOLAS 74/88/00/02/08
regs.III/20, 21 and 26; LSA Code sections 2.3 to 2.5, 3.2 and 4.1 to 4.6);
(PI) 5.1.3.95 examining the embarkation arrangements for each survival craft and the
testing of each launching appliance, including overload tests, tests to
establish the lowering speed and the lowering of each survival craft to
the water with the ship at its lightest seagoing draught, checking the
recovery of each lifeboat (SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/11, 12, 13, 15, 20
and 48);
(PI) 5.1.3.96 deployment of 50% of the MES after installation (LSA Code
paragraph 6.2.2.2);
(PI) 5.1.3.97 examining each rescue boat, including its equipment; for inflatable rescue
boats, confirming that they are stowed in a fully inflated condition
(SOLAS 74/00/04 regs.III/21 and 26.3; LSA Code section 5.1 and
MSC/Circ.809);
(PI) 5.1.3.98 examining the embarkation and recovery arrangements for each rescue
boat and testing each launching and recovery appliance, including
overload tests, tests to establish the lowering and recovery speeds and
ensuring that each rescue boat can be lowered to the water and
recovered with the ship at its lightest seagoing draught; the rescue
boat(s) should be lowered to the water and its recovery demonstrated
while underway at 5 knots (SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/14, 16, 17 and 20);
(PI) 5.1.3.99 examining the arrangements for mustering passengers (SOLAS 74/88
reg.III/24);
(PI) 5.1.3.100 testing that the engine of the rescue boat(s) and of each lifeboat, when
so fitted, start satisfactorily and operate both ahead and astern
(LSA Code section 4.4.6.5);
(PI) 5.1.3.101 confirming that there are posters or signs in the vicinity of survival craft
and their launching stations (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/9);
(PI) 5.1.3.102 examining the provision and stowage and checking the operation of
two-way VHF radiotelephone apparatus and search and rescue locating
devices (SOLAS 74/88/08 reg.III/6);
(PI) 5.1.3.103 examining the provision and stowage of the distress flares and the
line-throwing appliance, checking the provision and operation of
onboard communications equipment and testing the means of operation
of the general alarm system, verifying that the general alarm system is
audible in accommodation, normal crew working spaces and on open
decks (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/6);
(PI) 5.1.3.104 examining the provision, disposition and stowage of the lifebuoys,
including those fitted with self-igniting lights, self-activating smoke
signals and buoyant lines, lifejackets, * immersion suits and thermal
protective aids (SOLAS 74/88/06 regs.III/7, 21, 22 and 26;
LSA Code section 2.1-2.5 and 3.3);
(PI) 5.1.3.104.1 checking that the life-saving appliances are of an international or vivid
reddish orange, or a comparably highly visible colour on all parts where
this will assist detection at sea (LSA Code section 1.2.2.6);
(PI) 5.1.3.104.2 checking the provision of lifejackets in three sizes (Infant, Child, Adult)
and checking that they are marked by either weight or height, or by both
weight and height (LSA Code section 2.2.1.1); for passenger ships on
voyages less than 24 h, checking that the number of infant lifejackets is
equal to at least 2.5% of the number of passengers on board and for
passenger ships on voyages 24 h or greater, checking that infant
lifejackets are provided for each infant on board (SOLAS 74/06
reg.III/7.2.1);
(PI) 5.1.3.104.3 checking that immersion suits designed to be worn in conjunction with a
lifejacket are suitably marked (LSA Code section 2.3.1);
(PI) 5.1.3.105 checking the lighting of the muster and embarkation stations and the
alleyways, stairways and exits giving access to the muster and
embarkation stations, including when supplied from the emergency
source of power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/42 and III/11);
(PI) 5.1.3.106 checking that means of rescue is provided on ro-ro passenger ships
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/26.4);
(PI) 5.1.3.107 checking that a helicopter pick-up area is provided on ro-ro passenger
ships (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/28);
(PI) 5.1.3.108 checking that a decision support system is provided for the master
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/29; SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-2/21 and 22);
(PI) 5.1.3.110 examining the provision and positioning and checking the operation of,
as appropriate, the navigation lights, shapes and sound signalling
equipment (International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea in
force, rules 20 to 24, 27 to 30 and 33);
(PI) 5.1.1.111 checking the provision and specification of the daylight signalling lamp
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.V/11);
(PI) 5.1.3.112 checking, as appropriate, the provision and operation of the following
equipment (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19):
(PI) 5.1.3.112.1 the magnetic compass, including examining the siting, movement,
illumination and a pelorus or compass bearing device
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.3.112.2 that nautical charts and nautical publications necessary for the intended
voyage are available and have been updated and, where ECDIS is used,
that the electronic charts have been updated and the required backup
system is provided and updated (SOLAS 74/00/09 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.3.112.8 echo-sounding device, including examining the display for good access,
viewing and lighting;
(PI) 5.1.3.112.9 radar(s), including examining the waveguide and cable runs for routeing
and protection and the display unit confirming lighting, plotting facilities,
correct operation of all controls, functions and the true-motion facility if
provided;
(PI) 5.1.3.112.10 electronic plotting aid, automatic tracking aid or automatic radar plotting
aid as appropriate, using the appropriate test facilities;
(PI) 5.1.3.113 checking for the provision, specification, operation and annual
performance test of the voyage data recorder (SOLAS 74/00/04
reg.V/20);
(PI) 5.1.3.114 checking that a valid conformance test report of the long-range and
identification tracking system is available on board (SOLAS 74/04
reg.V/19-1);
(PI) 5.1.3.115 checking that the International Code of Signals and an up-to-date copy
of Volume III of the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and
Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual have been provided (SOLAS 74/00/02
reg.V/21);
(PI) 5.1.3.116 checking the provision of the pilot transfer arrangement, the access to
the ship's deck and the associated equipment and lighting, checking the
operation of the pilot ladders and combination arrangements, where
applicable (SOLAS 74/00/10 reg.V/23);
(PI) 5.1.3.117 examining the position, physical and electromagnetic protection and
illumination of each radio installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/6);
(PI) 5.1.3.118 confirming the provision of equipment for the radio installation with due
regard to the declared sea areas in which the ship will trade and the
declared means of maintaining availability of functional requirements
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.III/6, IV/7 to 11, 14 and 15);
(PI) 5.1.3.119 confirming the ability to initiate the transmission of ship-to-shore distress
alerts by at least two separate and independent means, each using a
different radio communication service, from the position from which the
ship is normally navigated (SOLAS 74/88/06 regs.IV/4, 7 to 11);
(PI) 5.1.3.120.1 visually checking all antennas, including Inmarsat antennas, and feeders
for satisfactory siting and absence of defects (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.121.1 checking there is sufficient capacity to operate the basic or duplicated
equipment for 1 hour or 6 hours, as appropriate (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.121.2.1 checking its siting and installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.121.2.3 with the battery off charge, and the maximum required radio installation
load connected to the reserve source of energy, checking the battery
voltage and discharge current;
(PI) 5.1.3.121.2.4 checking that the charger(s) are capable of recharging the reserve
battery within 10 hours (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.122.2 checking frequency tolerance, transmission line quality and radio
frequency power output (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.122.3 checking for correct operation of all controls including priority of control
units (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.122.4 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.122.5 checking the operation of the VHF control unit(s) or portable VHF
equipment provided for navigational safety (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/6);
(PI) 5.1.3.122.6 checking for correct operation by on-air contact with a coast station or
other ship;
(PI) 5.1.3.123 examining the VHF DSC controller and channel 70 DSC watch receiver,
including:
(PI) 5.1.3.123.1 performing an off-air check confirming the correct Maritime Mobile
Service Identity is programmed in the equipment (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.123.2 checking for correct transmission by means of a routine or test call to a
coast station, other ship, onboard duplicate equipment or special test
equipment;
(PI) 5.1.3.123.3 checking for correct reception by means of a routine or test call from a
coast station, other ship, onboard duplicate equipment or special test
equipment;
(PI) 5.1.3.123.5 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.124.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.124.3 checking the equipment is within frequency tolerance on all appropriate
bands (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.124.4 checking for correct operation by contact with a coast station and/or
measuring transmission line quality and radio frequency output;
(PI) 5.1.3.124.6 if control units are provided outside the navigating bridge, checking the
control unit on the bridge has first priority for the purpose of initiating
distress alerts (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/9, 10, 11 and 14);
(PI) 5.1.3.124.7 checking the correct operation of the radiotelephone alarm signal
generating device on a frequency other than 2182 kHz;
(PI) 5.1.3.125.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.125.2 confirming that the correct selective calling number is programmed in
the equipment;
(PI) 5.1.3.125.3 checking correct operation by inspection of recent hard copy or by a test
with a coast radio station (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/10 and 11);
(PI) 5.1.3.126 examining the MF/HF DSC controller(s), including:
(PI) 5.1.3.126.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/13);
(PI) 5.1.3.126.2 confirming that the correct Maritime Mobile Service Identity is
programmed in the equipment;
(PI) 5.1.3.127.1 confirming that only distress and safety DSC frequencies are being
monitored (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/9 to 12);
(PI) 5.1.3.127.2 checking that a continuous watch is being maintained while keying
MF/HF radio transmitters (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/12);
(PI) 5.1.3.127.3 checking for correct operation by means of a test call from a coast station
or other ship;
(PI) 5.1.3.128.1 checking that the equipment operates from the main, emergency
(if provided) and reserve sources of energy, and that where an
uninterrupted supply of information from the ship's navigational or other
equipment is required ensuring such information remains available in the
event of failure of the ship's main or emergency source of electrical
power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/13 and 14);
(PI) 5.1.3.128.2 checking the distress function by means of an approved test procedure
where possible (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/10, 12 and 14);
(PI) 5.1.3.128.3 checking for correct operation by inspection of recent hard copy or by
test call;
(PI) 5.1.3.130 examining the enhanced group call equipment (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/7
and 14), including:
(PI) 5.1.3.130.1 checking for correct operation and area by monitoring incoming
messages or by inspecting recent hard copy;
(PI) 5.1.3.131 if appropriate, examining the radio equipment for receipt of maritime
safety information by HF NBDP (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/7, 12 and 14),
including:
(PI) 5.1.3.132 examining the 406 MHz satellite EPIRB (SOLAS 74/88 regs.IV/7
and 14), including:
(PI) 5.1.3.132.4 checking that the unique beacon identification code is clearly marked on
the outside of the equipment and, where possible, decoding the unique
beacon identification code confirming it is correct;
(PI) 5.1.3.132.5 checking that the unique beacon identification code programmed in the
EPIRB corresponds with the unique beacon identification code assigned
by or on behalf of the Administration;
(PI) 5.1.3.132.6 checking that the MMSI number if encoded in the beacon corresponds
with the MMSI number assigned to the ship;
(PI) 5.1.3.132.8 if provided, checking the hydrostatic release and its expiry date;
(PI) 5.1.3.133 examining the two-way VHF radiotelephone apparatus (SOLAS 74/88
reg.III/6), including:
(PI) 5.1.3.133.1 checking for correct operation on channel 16 and one other by testing
with another fixed or portable VHF installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.133.3 checking the expiry date of primary batteries where used (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.133.4 where appropriate, checking any fixed installation provided in a survival
craft (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/14);
(PI) 5.1.3.134 examining the search and rescue locating device(s) (SOLAS 74/88/08
reg.III/6 and regs.IV/7 and 14), including:
(PI) 5.1.3.135 examining the test equipment and spares carried to ensure carriage is
adequate in accordance with the sea areas in which the ship trades and
the declared options for maintaining availability of the functional
requirements (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/15);
(PI) 5.1.3.136 checking the distress panel installed at the conning position; or, where
applicable, an additional EPIRB is placed near the conning position
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/6);
(PI) 5.1.3.138 checking the distress alarm panel installed at the conning position and
its visual and aural indications of received distress alerts (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/6);
(PI) 5.1.3.139 checking the provision and operation of the means for two-way on-scene
communication for search and rescue purposes and its operation
on 121.5 MHz and 123.1 MHz from the position from which the ship is
normally navigated (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/7);
(PI) 5.1.3.140 confirming that the ship's identification number is permanently marked
(SOLAS 74/02 reg.XI-1/3);
(PI) 5.1.3.141 checking the provision and operation of the automatic identification
system (SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.3.142 for passenger ships carrying more than 36 passengers constructed on
or after 1 July 2010, checking the provision of a suitably located means
for fully recharging breathing air cylinders, free from contamination
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/10.10.2.6);
(PI) 5.1.3.145 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010 and having a
length of 120 m or more or having three or more main vertical zones,
checking the designation of safe areas (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/21);
(PI) 5.1.3.146 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, checking the
provision of a safety centre (SOLAS 74 reg.II-2/23) and associated
ventilation requirements (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/8.2); and
(PI) 5.1.4 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships using natural
gas as fuel the additional requirements for the survey during
construction and after installation should consist of:
(PI) 5.1.4.2 confirming the inert gas system is satisfactory (IGF Code ch.6);
(PI) 5.1.4.3 confirming the ventilation arrangements are satisfactory (IGF Code
chs.12 and 13);
(PI) 5.1.4.4 confirming that the fuel containment systems are arranged and installed
in accordance with the approved plans, internally examining the fuel
containments and ensuring that the appropriate testing is carried out
(IGF Code chs.6 and 16);
(PI) 5.1.4.5 examining the electrical installations with particular reference to the
certified safe type equipment fitted in gas-dangerous spaces and zones
(IGF Code chs.12 and 14);
(PI) 5.1.4.6 examining the arrangements for the fire protection and fire extinction
(IGF Code ch.11);
(PI) 5.1.4.7 examining the fire pump capacity and working pressure in relation to the
water spray system, if the water spray system is part of the fire main
system (IGF Code para.11.4.1);
(PI) 5.1.4.8 examining the isolating valves of the fire main, when the fuel storage
tank(s) is located on the open deck (IGF Code para.11.4.2);
(PI) 5.1.4.9 examining the water spray system arrangement for fuel storage tanks(s)
on open deck including remote operation (IGF Code para.11.5);
(PI) 5.1.4.10 examining the fixed dry chemical powder fire-extinguishing system for
the bunkering station area (IGF Code para.11.6.1);
(PI) 5.1.4.11 examining the portable dry powder extinguisher (IGF Code para.11.6.2);
(PI) 5.1.4.12 examining the fixed fire detection and alarm system (IGF Code
section 11.7);
(PI) 5.1.5 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the check that
the required documentation has been placed on board should consist of:
(PI) 5.1.5.1 confirming that the stability information and damage control plans and
damage control booklets have been provided (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/22
and 23) (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/5-1 and 19);
(PI) 5.1.5.2 checking, where applicable, that the noise survey report as required by
the Code on Noise Nevels on Board Ships is available on board
(SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(PI) 5.1.5.4 confirming that the manoeuvring booklet has been provided and that the
manoeuvring information has been displayed on the navigating bridge
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/28);
(PI) 5.1.5.5 confirming that documented operating procedures for closing and
securing the openings in special category spaces and ro-ro spaces are
available on board (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/23);
(PI) 5.1.5.6 where applicable, confirming that the approved Cargo Securing Manual
for ships carrying cargoes other than solid and liquid bulk cargoes, cargo
units and cargo transport units is on board (SOLAS 74/98/02 reg.VI/5.6);
(PI) 5.1.5.7 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements is on board (SOLAS 74/00/06/15
regs.II-1/55, II-2/17 and III/38 and IGF Code ch.2);
(PI) 5.1.5.8 confirming that the fire control plans are permanently exhibited or,
alternatively, that emergency booklets have been provided to each
officer and a duplicate of the plans or the emergency booklet are
available in a prominently marked enclosure external to the ship's
deckhouse (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/15.2.4 and 15.3.2) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/20); and that the fire control plan is in the language required by
the Administration;
(PI) 5.1.5.9 confirming that the maintenance plans have been provided
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/14.2.2 and 14.3);
(PI) 5.1.5.10 confirming that the training manuals and the fire safety operational
booklets have been provided (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/15.2.3 and 16.2);
(PI) 5.1.5.11 confirming, when appropriate, that the ship is provided with a document
indicating compliance with the special requirements for carrying
dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19.4) (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-2/41 and 54.3);
(PI) 5.1.5.12 confirming that emergency instructions are available for each person on
board, that the muster list is posted in conspicuous places, and that they
are in a language understood by the persons on board (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/8 and 37);
(PI) 5.1.5.13 confirming that ship-specific plans and procedures for recovery of persons
from the water have been provided (SOLAS 74/12 reg.III/17-1);
(PI) 5.1.5.14 confirming that the training manual for the life-saving appliances has
been provided and is available in the working language of the ship
(SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.III/35);
(PI) 5.1.5.15 confirming that the checklist and instructions for MES, if provided, and
onboard maintenance of the life-saving appliances have been provided
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/36);
(PI) 5.1.5.16 confirming that a table or curve of residual deviations for the magnetic
compass have been provided, and that a diagram of the radar
installations shadow sectors is displayed (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PI) 5.1.5.17 checking that operational and, where appropriate, maintenance manuals
for all navigational equipment are provided (SOLAS 74/00 regs.V/16
and 19);
(PI) 5.1.5.18 checking that the charts and nautical publications necessary for the
intended voyage are available and have been updated (SOLAS 74/00
regs.V/19 and 27);
(PI) 5.1.5.19 checking that the International Code of Signals is available where the
ship is required to carry a radio installation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.V/21);
(PI) 5.1.5.20 checking that records are provided, identifying any pilot ladders placed
into service (SOLAS 74/10 reg.V/23.2.4);
(PI) 5.1.5.21 confirming that a list showing the operational limitations imposed on the
ship is kept on board (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/30);
(PI) 5.1.5.22 checking that an illustrated table describing the life-saving signals to be
used by ships, aircraft or persons in distress is available (SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/29);
(PI) 5.1.5.23 checking the carriage of operating manuals for all equipment
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/15);
(PI) 5.1.5.24 checking the carriage of service manuals for all equipment when at-sea
maintenance is the declared option (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/15);
(PI) 5.1.5.25 checking for a valid radio licence issued by the flag Administration
(ITU RR Article 24);
(PI) 5.1.5.28 checking the radio log (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/19 in force prior
to 1 February 1992 and ITU RR App.11);
(PI) 5.1.5.29 checking the carriage of up-to-date ITU publications (ITU RR App.11);
(PI) 5.1.5.30 checking that the EPIRB has been subject to maintenance at intervals
not exceeding five years at an approved shore-based maintenance
facility;
(PI) 5.1.5.32 confirming that a continuous synopsis record is provided (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XI-1/5); and
(PI) 5.1.6 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the
completion of the initial survey should consist of:
(PI) 5.1.6.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate
and its associated Record of Equipment (Form P).
(PR) 5.2.1 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the
examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(PR) 5.2.1.1 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.2 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.3 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(PR) 5.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.6 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(PR) 5.2.1.7 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(PR) 5.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.10 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(PR) 5.2.1.11 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(PR) 5.2.1.13 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.14 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum
Safe Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(PR) 5.2.1.15 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(PR) 5.2.1.16 checking, where applicable, that the noise survey report as required by
the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships is available on board
(SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(PR) 5.2.1.17 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements is on board (SOLAS 74/00/06/15
regs.II-1/55, II-2/17 and III/38 and IGF Code ch.2);
(PR) 5.2.1.18 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(PR) 5.2.1.19 checking that the routine surveys of the boilers and other pressure
vessels, as determined by the Administration, have been carried out as
required and that safety devices, such as the boiler safety valves, have
been tested;
(PR) 5.2.1.20 checking that, as appropriate, the hull and machinery have been
presented for survey in accordance with the continuous survey scheme
approved by the Administration or a classification society;
(PR) 5.2.1.21 confirming that the opening and the closing and locking of sidescuttles
positioned below the margin line or the bulkhead deck, as applicable,
are being recorded in the log-book (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/17),
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(PR) 5.2.1.22 confirming that the closure of the cargo loading doors and the opening
and closing of any doors at sea required for the operation of the ship or
the embarking and disembarking of passengers are being recorded in
the log-book (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/20-1) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/22);
(PR) 5.2.1.23 confirming that the stability information and damage control plans and
damage control booklets are readily available (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/22 and 23) (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/5-1 and 19);
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(PR) 5.2.1.24 confirming from the log-book entries that the openings required to be
closed at sea are being kept closed and that the required drills and
inspections of watertight doors, etc., are being carried out (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/24 and 25) (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/21 and 22);
(PR) 5.2.1.25 confirming that documented operating procedures for closing and
securing the openings in special category spaces and ro-ro spaces are
available on board (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/23);
(PR) 5.2.1.26 confirming that the manoeuvring booklet is readily available and that the
manoeuvring information is displayed on the navigating bridge
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/28);
(PR) 5.2.1.27 confirming that the fire control plans are permanently exhibited or,
alternatively, that emergency booklets have been provided and a
duplicate of the plans or the emergency booklet is available in a
prominently marked enclosure external to the ship's deckhouse
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/20);
(PR) 5.2.1.28 confirming that the maintenance plans have been provided
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/14.2.2 and 14.3);
(PR) 5.2.1.29 confirming that the training manuals and the fire safety operational
booklets have been provided (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/15.2.3 and 16.2);
(PR) 5.2.1.30 checking whether any fire has occurred on board necessitating the
operation of the fixed fire-extinguishing systems or the portable fire
extinguishers since the last survey and the entries into the ship's
log-book;
(PR) 5.2.1.31 checking, when appropriate, that the ship is provided with a document
indicating compliance with the special requirements for carrying
dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/00/08 reg.II-2/19.4) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/54.3);
(PR) 5.2.1.32 confirming that ship-specific plans and procedures for recovery of persons
from the water have been provided (SOLAS 74/12 reg.III/17-1);
(PR) 5.2.1.33 confirming, when appropriate, that there is a special list, manifest or
stowage plan for the carriage of dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/88
reg.VII/5);
(PR) 5.2.1.34 confirming that emergency instructions are available for each person on
board, that the muster list is posted in conspicuous places, and that they
are in a language understood by the persons on board (SOLAS 74/00
regs.III/8 and 37);
(PR) 5.2.1.36 checking that log-book entries are being made (SOLAS 74/00/13
regs.III/19 and 20), in particular:
(PR) 5.2.1.36.1 the date when the last full muster of the passengers and crew for boat
and fire drill took place, and the date when the last enclosed space entry
and rescue drills took place;
(PR) 5.2.1.36.2 the records indicating that on voyages where passengers are scheduled
to be on board for more than 24 h, musters of newly embarked
passengers have taken place prior to or immediately upon departure;
(PR) 5.2.1.36.3 the records indicating that the lifeboat equipment was examined at that
time and found to be complete;
(PR) 5.2.1.36.4 the last occasion when the lifeboats were swung out and when each one
was lowered into the water;
(PR) 5.2.1.36.5 the records indicating that crew members have received the appropriate
onboard training;
(PR) 5.2.1.37 confirming that the training manual and training aids for the life-saving
appliances are available on board in the working language of the ship
(SOLAS 74/00/04 reg.III/35);
(PR) 5.2.1.38 confirming that the instructions for on board maintenance of the
life-saving appliances is on board (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/36);
(PR) 5.2.1.39 checking by the log-book entries that the testing and the emergency
drills of the steering gear have been carried out (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/26);
(PR) 5.2.1.40 confirming that a table or curve of residual deviations for the magnetic
compass is available and that a diagram of the radar installations
shadow sectors is displayed (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PR) 5.2.1.41 checking that operational and, where appropriate, maintenance manuals
for all navigational equipment are provided (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/16);
(PR) 5.2.1.42 checking that the charts and nautical publications necessary for the
intended voyage are available and have been updated (SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/27);
(PR) 5.2.1.43 checking that the compass deviation book is properly maintained
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PR) 5.2.1.44 checking that records are maintained identifying any pilot ladders placed
into service and any repair effected (SOLAS 74/10 reg.V/23.2.4);
(PR) 5.2.1.45 confirming that a list showing the operational limitations imposed on the
ship is kept on board (SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/30);
(PR) 5.2.1.46 checking that an illustrated table describing the life-saving signals to be
used by ships, aircraft or persons in distress is available (SOLAS 74/00
reg.V/29);
(PR) 5.2.1.47 confirming the provisions of (PI) 5.1.5.17 to (PI) 5.1.5.23 except
(PI) 5.1.5.20;
(PR) 5.2.1.48 confirming that a record has been kept in the period since the last survey
to the satisfaction of the Administration and as required by the Radio
Regulations (SOLAS 74/88 reg.IV/17);
(PR) 5.2.1.49 checking documentary evidence that the actual capacity of the battery
has been proved in port within the last 12 months (SOLAS 74/88
reg.IV/13);
(PR) 5.2.1.50 if applicable, checking that a list of all limitations on the operation of a
passenger ship is kept on board and updated;
(PR) 5.2.1.51 where applicable, confirming that the approved Cargo Securing Manual
for ships carrying cargoes other than solid and liquid bulk cargoes, cargo
units and cargo transport units is on board (SOLAS 74/98/02 reg.VI/5.6);
(PR) 5.2.1.52 confirming that a continuous synopsis record is provided (SOLAS 74/02
reg.XI-1/5);
(PR) 5.2.1.53 checking that the annual test has been carried out for the Satellite EPIRB
and, if applicable, that shore-based maintenance has been carried out
at intervals not exceeding five years (SOLAS 74/04 reg.IV/15);
(PR) 5.2.2 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the renewal
survey should consist of:
(PR) 5.2.2.1 examining the outside of the ship's bottom, including the bottom and bow
plating, keel, bilge keels, stem, stern frame, rudder, sea chests and
strainers, noting the clearance measured in the rudder bearings,
examining the propeller and shaft seals, as far as practicable, and noting
the clearance measured in the propeller shafts (SOLAS 74/88
reg.I/7(b)(ii));
(PR) 5.2.2.2 examining the arrangements for subdivision, including the ship's
stability in the damaged condition, and checking the subdivision load
lines (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/4 to 8, 13 and 16) (SOLAS 74/06/12
regs.II-1/8, 8-1, 14 and 18);
(PR) 5.2.2.3 confirming the provision of operational information to the master for safe
return to port after a flooding casualty by onboard stability computer or
shore-based support (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/8-1);
(PR) 5.2.2.5 confirming that dedicated seawater ballast tanks have been coated in
accordance with resolution MSC.215(82), as amended, when
appropriate (SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(PR) 5.2.2.6 confirming when appropriate that the maintenance of the protective
coating is included in the overall ship's maintenance system
(SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-1/3-2);
(PR) 5.2.2.7 examining the collision and other watertight bulkheads required for the
ship's subdivision (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/10, 14, 15 and 18)
(SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-1/10, 11, 12, 13 and 16);
(PR) 5.2.2.8 confirming that the watertight integrity has been maintained where pipes,
scuppers, etc., pass through subdivision watertight bulkheads
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PR) 5.2.2.9 confirming that a diagram is provided on the navigating bridge showing
the location of the watertight doors together with indicators showing
whether the doors are open or closed (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15)
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PR) 5.2.2.10 testing the operation of the watertight doors both from the navigating
bridge in the event of an emergency and locally at the door itself
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13) and, in particular,
that they are:
(PR) 5.2.2.11 testing the remote hand-operation to close the power-operated sliding
watertight door from an accessible position above the bulkhead deck
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PR) 5.2.2.12 confirming that the watertight doors and their indicating devices are
operable in the event of a failure of the main and emergency sources of
power (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PR) 5.2.2.13 checking, when appropriate, any watertight doors that are not required
to be closed remotely, fitted in watertight bulkheads dividing 'tween deck
spaces, and confirming that a notice is affixed concerning their closure
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PR) 5.2.2.14 confirming that a notice is affixed to any portable plates on bulkheads in
machinery spaces concerning their closure and, if appropriate, testing
any power-operated watertight door fitted in lieu (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/15) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/13);
(PR) 5.2.2.15 examining the arrangements for closing sidescuttles and their
deadlights, also scuppers, sanitary discharges and similar openings and
other inlets and discharges in the shell plating below the margin line
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/17);
(PR) 5.2.2.16 examining the arrangements for closing sidescuttles and their
deadlights, also scuppers, sanitary discharges and similar openings and
other inlets and discharges in the shell plating below the bulkhead deck
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(PR) 5.2.2.17 confirming that valves for closing the main and auxiliary sea inlets and
discharges in the machinery spaces are readily accessible and
indicators showing the status of the valves are provided (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/17) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(PR) 5.2.2.18 confirming that gangway, cargo and coaling ports fitted below the margin
line may be effectively closed and that the inboard ends of any ash or
rubbish chutes are fitted with an effective cover (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/17);
(PR) 5.2.2.19 confirming that gangway, cargo and fuelling ports fitted below the
bulkhead deck may be effectively closed and that the inboard ends of
any ash or rubbish chutes are fitted with an effective cover
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/15);
(PR) 5.2.2.20 examining the arrangements to maintain the watertight integrity above
the margin line or the bulkhead deck as applicable (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/20) (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/17);
(PR) 5.2.2.21 examining the arrangements for the bilge pumping and confirming that
each bilge pump and the bilge pumping system provided for each
watertight compartment is working efficiently (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21)
(SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(PR) 5.2.2.22 confirming that the drainage system of enclosed cargo spaces situated
on the freeboard deck is working efficiently (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/21)
(SOLAS 74/05 reg.II-1/35-1);
(PR) 5.2.2.23 examining visually the drainage facilities for blockage or other damage
and confirming the provision of means to prevent blockage of drainage
arrangements, for closed vehicle and ro-ro spaces and special category
spaces where fixed pressure water-spraying systems are used
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-2/20.6.1.5);
(PR) 5.2.2.24 examining, when appropriate, the means of indicating the status of any
bow doors and any leakage therefrom (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/23-2);
(PR) 5.2.2.25 confirming, that the arrangement for monitoring special category spaces
or ro-ro spaces, when fitted, is satisfactory (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-1/23);
(PR) 5.2.2.26 confirming that the machinery, boilers and other pressure vessels,
associated piping systems and fittings are being maintained so as to
reduce to a minimum any danger to persons on board, due regard being
given to moving parts, hot surfaces and other hazards (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/26);
(PR) 5.2.2.27 confirming that normal operation of the propulsion machinery can be
sustained or restored even though one of the essential auxiliaries
becomes inoperative (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(PR) 5.2.2.28 confirming that means are provided so that the machinery can be
brought into operation from the dead ship condition without external aid
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/26);
(PR) 5.2.2.29 examining, where practicable, the means provided to protect against
overpressure in the parts of main, auxiliary and other machinery that is
subject to internal pressure and may be subject to dangerous
overpressure (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PR) 5.2.2.30 examining, when appropriate, the crankcase explosion relief devices
fitted to internal combustion engines and confirming that they are
arranged so as to minimize the possibility of injury to personnel
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PR) 5.2.2.31 confirming that the automatic shut-off arrangements fitted to the main
turbine propulsion machinery and, where applicable, main internal
combustion propulsion machinery and auxiliary machinery are being
properly maintained (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/27);
(PR) 5.2.2.32 confirming, as far as practicable, the ability of the machinery to reverse
the direction of the thrust of the propeller in sufficient time, including the
effectiveness of any supplementary means of manoeuvring or stopping
the ship (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/28);
(PR) 5.2.2.33 confirming that the main and auxiliary steering gear are being properly
maintained, are arranged so that the failure of one does not render the other
inoperative and that the auxiliary steering gear is capable of being brought
speedily into action in an emergency* (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.34 confirming that, where appropriate, essential components of the steering
gear are permanently lubricated or provided with lubrication fittings
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.35 confirming that relief valves fitted to the steering gear hydraulic system
which can be isolated and in which pressure can be generated from the
power source or from external forces are being maintained and are set
to a pressure not exceeding the design pressure (SOLAS 74/88/14
reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.36 confirming that the main or auxiliary steering gear power units restart
automatically when power is restored after a power failure, that they are
capable of being brought into operation from a position on the navigating
bridge and that, in the event of a power failure to any one of the steering
gear power units, an audible and visual alarm is given on the navigating
bridge (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.37 confirming that the control systems for the main steering gear from both
the navigating bridge and the steering gear compartment are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
* For ships fitted with alternative propulsion and steering arrangements other than traditional arrangements, such
as but not limited to azimuthing propulsors or water jet propulsion systems, refer to the Unified interpretation of
SOLAS regulations II-1/28, II-1/29 and II-1/30 (MSC.1/Circ.1416/Rev.1).
(PR) 5.2.2.38 confirming that, where the main steering gear comprises two or more
identical power units and an auxiliary steering gear is not fitted, the two
independent control systems from the navigating bridge are operating
satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.39 confirming that the control system for the auxiliary steering gear, in the
steering gear compartment and, if this gear is power-operated, from the
navigating bridge, are operating satisfactorily and that the latter is
independent of the control system for the main steering gear
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.40 confirming that an audible and visual alarm is given on the navigating
bridge in the event of a failure of electrical power supply
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.41 confirming that the means of communication between the bridge and the
steering gear is operating satisfactorily and that, with ships having
emergency steering positions, a telephone or other means of
communication for relaying heading information and supplying visual
compass readings to the emergency steering position is provided
(SOLAS 74/14 regs.II-1/29 and SOLAS 74/00 reg.V/19);
(PR) 5.2.2.42 confirming that the angular position of the rudder is indicated
independently of the steering control system on the navigating bridge if
the main steering gear is power-operated and that this angular position
is given in the steering gear compartment (SOLAS 74/14 reg.II 1/29 and
SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-1/29 and reg.V/19);
(PR) 5.2.2.43 confirming that with a hydraulic power-operated steering gear the
audible and visual low-level alarms on the navigating bridge and in the
machinery space for each hydraulic fluid reservoir are operating
satisfactorily and that at least one power-actuating system including the
reservoir can be recharged from a position within the steering gear
compartment by means of a fixed storage tank to which a contents
gauge is fitted with fixed piping (SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.44 confirming that the steering gear compartment is readily accessible and
is provided with suitable arrangements to ensure working access to
steering gear machinery and controls under safe conditions
(SOLAS 74/88/14 reg.II-1/29);
(PR) 5.2.2.45 confirming that, with electric and electro-hydraulic steering gear, the
means for indicating on the navigating bridge and at a main machinery
control position that the motors are running and, as far as practicable,
that the overload alarm and alarm for the loss of a phase in a
three-phase supply located at the main machinery control position are
operating satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/30);
(PR) 5.2.2.46 confirming that the effective means of operation and control of the main
and auxiliary machinery essential for the propulsion and the safety of the
ship are being maintained, including, when appropriate, any means for
remotely controlling the propulsion machinery from the navigating bridge
(including the control, monitoring, reporting, alert and safety actions)
(SOLAS 74/88/00/02 reg.II-1/31);
(PR) 5.2.2.47 confirming that arrangements for operating main and other machinery
from a machinery control room are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/31);
(PR) 5.2.2.48 confirming that the means provided for manually overriding automatic
controls are being maintained and that a failure does not prevent the use
of the manual override (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/31);
(PR) 5.2.2.49 confirming that the appropriate safety features fitted to the oil-fired and
exhaust gas boilers, unfired steam generators, steam pipe systems and
air pressure systems are being maintained (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-I/32, 33 and 34);
(PR) 5.2.2.50 confirming the operation of the ventilation for the machinery spaces
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-I/35);
(PR) 5.2.2.51 when appropriate, confirming that the measures to prevent noise in
machinery spaces are effective (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-I/36 and
SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12.2); or confirming that the ship was
constructed to reduce onboard noise and to protect personnel from noise
in accordance with the Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships, adopted
by resolution MSC.337(91), as amended (SOLAS 74/12 reg.II-1/3-12);
(PR) 5.2.2.52 confirming that the engine-room telegraph giving visual indication of the
orders and answers both in the machinery space and on the navigation
bridge is operating satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/37);
(PR) 5.2.2.53 confirming that the second means of communication between the
navigation bridge and machinery space is also operating satisfactorily,
including any appropriate means provided to any other positions from
which the engines are controlled (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/37);
(PR) 5.2.2.54 confirming that the engineer's alarm is clearly audible in the engineers'
accommodation (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/38);
(PR) 5.2.2.55 confirming that precautions taken to prevent any oil that may escape
under pressure from any pump, filter or heater from coming into contact
with heated surfaces, are efficient;
(PR) 5.2.2.56 confirming that the means of ascertaining the amount of oil contained in
any oil tank are in satisfactory working condition (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/15) (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2.2.3.5);
(PR) 5.2.2.57 confirming that the devices provided to prevent overpressure in any oil
tank or in any part of the oil system, including the filling pipes, are in
satisfactory working condition (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/15) (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/4.2.2.4);
(PR) 5.2.2.58 confirming that the electrical installations, including the main source of
power and lighting systems, are being maintained (SOLAS 74/88
regs.II-1/40 and 41);
(PR) 5.2.2.59 confirming that the self-contained emergency source of electrical power
and its associated systems are operating satisfactorily (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/42);
(PR) 5.2.2.60 confirming that the starting arrangements of each emergency generating
set are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/44);
(PR) 5.2.2.61 checking, when appropriate, the disposition of and testing the
supplementary emergency lighting (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-1/42-1);
(PR) 5.2.2.62 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, checking the
provision of supplementary lighting in all cabins, and checking that such
lighting automatically illuminates and remains on for a minimum
of 30 min when power to the normal cabin lighting is lost (SOLAS 74/06
reg.II-1/41.6);
(PR) 5.2.2.63 confirming that precautions provided against shock, fire and other
hazards of electrical origin are being maintained (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/45);
(PR) 5.2.2.64 confirming, when appropriate, that the arrangements for the machinery
spaces being periodically unattended are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-1/54);
(PR) 5.2.2.65 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
for machinery or electrical installations, low-flashpoint fuel storage and
distribution systems, fire safety, or life-saving appliances and
arrangements, in accordance with the test, inspection and maintenance
requirements, if any, specified in the approved documentation
(SOLAS 74/00/06/15 regs.II-1/55, II-2/17 and III/38 and IGF Code ch.2);
(PR) 5.2.2.66 examining the fire pumps and fire main and the disposition of the hydrants,
hoses and nozzles and the international shore connection and checking
that each fire pump, including the emergency fire pump, can be operated
separately so that two jets of water are produced simultaneously from
different hydrants at any part of the ship while the required pressure is
maintained in the fire main (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/10.2; FSS Code
chs.2 and 12) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/4 and 19);
(PR) 5.2.2.67 for passenger ships designed to carry containers on or above the weather
deck, as applicable, examining the water mist lance (SOLAS 74/00/14
reg.II-2/10.7.3);
(PR) 5.2.2.68 examining the provision and randomly examining the condition of the
portable and non-portable fire extinguishers (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.3;
FSS Code ch.4) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/6);
(PR) 5.2.2.69 examining the fixed fire-extinguishing system for machinery, cargo, special
category and vehicle spaces and confirming that its means of operation are
clearly marked (SOLAS 74/00/12/14 regs.II-2/10.4,10.5, 10.7.1, 10.7.2
and 20.6.1; FSS Code chs.5 to 7) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/5, 7, 9, 10
and 53);
(PR) 5.2.2.70 examining the special arrangements in the machinery spaces and
confirming, as far as practicable and as appropriate, the operation of the
remote means of control provided for the opening and closing of the
skylights, the release of smoke, the closure of the funnel and ventilation
openings, the closure of power-operated and other doors, the stopping
of ventilation and boiler forced and induced draft fans and the stopping
of oil fuel and other pumps that discharge flammable liquids
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/5.2, 8.3 and 9.5) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/11);
(PR) 5.2.2.71 checking that fixed carbon dioxide fire-extinguishing systems for the
protection of machinery spaces, where applicable, are provided with two
separate controls, one for opening of the gas piping and one for
discharging the gas from the storage container, each of them located in
a release box clearly identified for the particular space (SOLAS 74/08
reg.II-2/10.4, FSS Code ch.5.2.2.2);
(PR) 5.2.2.72 examining the fire-extinguishing arrangements in control stations,
accommodation and service spaces (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.6.1; FSS
Code ch.8) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/36);
(PR) 5.2.2.73 examining, when applicable, the fire-extinguishing arrangements in
cabin balconies (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/10.6.1);
(PR) 5.2.2.74 examining the provision of fire-extinguishing systems for the spaces
containing paint and/or flammable liquids and deep-fat cooking
equipment in accommodation and service spaces (SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/10.6.3 and 10.6.4; FSS Code chs.5, 6 and 7) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/15.2.5));
(PR) 5.2.2.75 examining the arrangements for oil fuel, lubricating oil and other
flammable oils and testing the remote closing of valves for oil fuel,
lubricating oil and other flammable oils and the operation of the remote
means of closing the valves on the tanks that contain oil fuel, lubricating
oil and other flammable oils (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/4.2) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/15);
(PR) 5.2.2.76 examining and testing, as far as practicable, any fire detection and fire alarm
arrangements in machinery spaces, including enclosed spaces containing
incinerators, if applicable, accommodation and service spaces and control
spaces (SOLAS 74/00/10 reg.II-2/7 (except 7.5.5, 7.6 and 7.9); FSS Code
chs.8 and 9) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/11, 12, 13, 13-1, 14, 36 and 41);
(PR) 5.2.2.76.1 examining and testing, where applicable, any fire detection and fire
alarm arrangements on cabin balconies. (SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/7.10);
(PR) 5.2.2.76.2 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, confirming the
smoke detectors in cabins, when activated, are emitting, or cause to
emit, an audible alarm within the space where they are located
(SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-2/7.5.2 and 7.5.3.1);
(PR) 5.2.2.76.3 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, confirming
detectors and manually operated call points of a fixed fire detection and
fire alarm system can be remotely and individually identified
(SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/7.2.4);
(PR) 5.2.2.77 confirming that the fire-fighters' outfits including their self-contained
compressed air breathing apparatus, and the emergency escape
breathing devices (EEBDs) are complete and in good condition and that
the cylinders, including the spare cylinders, of the self-contained breathing
apparatus, are suitably charged, and that onboard means of recharging
breathing apparatus cylinders used during drills or a suitable number of
spare cylinders to replace those used are provided, and provision of
two-way portable radiotelephone apparatus of an explosion-proof type or
intrinsically safe (SOLAS 74/00/12 regs.II-2/10.10, 13.3.4, 13.4.3
and 15.2.2; FSS Code ch.3) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/17);
(PR) 5.2.2.79 confirming, as far as practicable, that no changes have been made in
the structural fire protection, including the structure, fire integrity,
protection of stairways and lifts, cabin balconies, openings in "A" and "B"
Class divisions, ventilation systems and windows and sidescuttles, and
the use of combustible material (SOLAS 74/00/04/12/15 regs.II-2/5.2,
5.3, 6, 8.2, 8.5, 9.2.1, 9.2.2, 9.3, 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.6 (except 9.6.3), 9.7 and 11
(except 11.6)) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/11, 16, 18, 23 to 35 and 37);
(PR) 5.2.2.80 confirming, as far as practicable, that no changes have been made in
the structural fire protection in cargo spaces intended for the carriage of
dangerous goods (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/19.3.8 and 19.3.10)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/4, 54.2.8, 54.2.10 and 54.2.11);
(PR) 5.2.2.81 examining and testing any manual and automatic fire doors including the
means of closing the openings in "A" and "B" Class divisions
(SOLAS 74/00 reg.II-2/9.4.1) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/30 and 31);
(PR) 5.2.2.82 examining and testing the fire dampers of ventilation ducts and the main
inlets and outlets of all ventilation systems and checking that the power
ventilation is capable of being stopped from outside the space served
(SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/5.2.1 and 9.7) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/16
and 32);
(PR) 5.2.2.83 confirming that the stairways and ladders, including the low-location
lighting system, arranged to provide a means of escape to the lifeboat
and liferaft embarkation deck from all passenger and crew spaces and
from those spaces in which the crew is normally employed are being
maintained (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/13.2, 13.3.1, 13.3.2 and 13.7; FSS
Code chs.11 and 13 (except paragraph 3)) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/28);
(PR) 5.2.2.84 confirming that the means of escape from any special category spaces
and ro-ro spaces are satisfactory (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/13.5 and 13.6)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/28);
(PR) 5.2.2.85 confirming that the means of escape from the machinery spaces are
satisfactory (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.II-2/13.4.1) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.II-2/28);
(PR) 5.2.2.86 examining the fire-extinguishing arrangements, examining and testing
the fire detection and alarm systems and the sample extraction smoke
detection systems, where applicable in cargo spaces for general cargo
and dangerous goods and testing, as far as practicable and as
appropriate, the operation of the means for closing the various openings
(SOLAS 74/00/14 regs.II-2/7.6, 10.7.1 and 10.7.2; FSS Code chs.5, 9
and 10) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/39);
(PR) 5.2.2.87 examining the fire-extinguishing arrangements examining and testing
the fire detection and alarm system and the sample extraction smoke
detection system, where applicable, in vehicle, special category and
ro-ro spaces, and testing, as far as practicable and as appropriate, the
operation of the means for closing the various openings (SOLAS 74/00
reg.II-2/20 (except 20.5); FSS Code chs.5, 6, 7, 9 and 10)
(SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/37, 38 and 38-1);
(PR) 5.2.2.88 examining and testing, as appropriate and as far as practicable, the crew
alarm and the public address system or other effective means of
communication (SOLAS 74/00 regs.II-2/7.9 and 12; LSA Code ch.7)
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/40);
(PR) 5.2.2.89 examining, when appropriate, the special arrangements for carrying
dangerous goods, including checking the electrical equipment and wiring,
ventilation, the provision of personnel protection clothing and portable
appliances, testing any fire detection and alarm system and any sample
extraction smoke detection system and testing, as far as practicable, the
water supply, bilge pumping and any water spray system (SOLAS 74/00/08
reg.II-2/19 (except 19.3.8, 19.3.10 and 19.4); FSS Code chs.3, 4, 7, 9
and 10) (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-2/41 and 54);
(PR) 5.2.2.90 examining, when appropriate, the helicopter facilities (SOLAS 74/00
regs.II-2/18, III/28) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.II-2/18.8);
(PR) 5.2.2.91 checking the requirement for passenger ships carrying more
than 36 passengers and constructed before 1 October 1994
(SOLAS 74/88/92 regs.II-2/41-1 and 41-2);
(PR) 5.2.2.92 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010 and having a
length of 120 m or more or having three or more main vertical zones,
checking the designation of safe areas (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/21);
(PR) 5.2.2.93 for passenger ships constructed on or after 1 July 2010, checking the
provision of a safety centre (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/23) and its associated
ventilation system (SOLAS 74/06 reg.II-2/8.2);
(PR) 5.2.2.94 checking that emergency instructions are available for each person on
board, the muster list is posted in conspicuous places and there are
signs or posters in the vicinity of survival craft and their launching
stations (SOLAS 74/96 regs.III/8, 9 and 37);
(PR) 5.2.2.95 checking that the falls used in launching have been periodically
inspected and have been renewed in the past five years
(SOLAS 74/96/04 reg.III/20);
(PR) 5.2.2.96 examining each survival craft, including its equipment and, when fitted,
the on-load release mechanism and hydrostatic lock, and for inflatable
liferafts the hydrostatic release unit and float free arrangements,
including the date of servicing or replacement; checking that the
hand-flares are not out of date and that the required number of search
and rescue locating devices are fitted in liferafts and those liferafts are
clearly marked (SOLAS 74/96/00/02/08 regs.III/20, 21, 23, 24 and 26;
LSA Code sections 2.3 to 2.5, 3.2 and 4.1 to 4.6);
(PR) 5.2.2.97 checking that the life-saving appliances are of an international or vivid
reddish orange, or a comparably highly visible colour on all parts where
this will assist detection at sea (LSA Code section 1.2.2.6);
(PR) 5.2.2.100 checking the rotational deployment of MES (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/20.8.2;
LSA Code section 6.2.2.2);
(PR) 5.2.2.101 examining each rescue boat, including its equipment; for inflatable
rescue boats, confirming that they are stowed in a fully inflated condition
(SOLAS 74/88/04 regs.III/14, 17, 21, 26.3 and 34);
(PR) 5.2.2.102 examining the embarkation and recovery arrangements for each rescue
boat (SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/14);
(PR) 5.2.2.103 checking the arrangements for mustering passengers (SOLAS 74/96
regs.III/11, 24 and 25);
(PR) 5.2.2.104 confirming that a means of rescue is provided on ro-ro passenger ships
(SOLAS 74/00 regs.III/11, 26.4);
(PR) 5.2.2.105 confirming that a helicopter pick-up area is provided on ro-ro passenger
ships (SOLAS 74/00 reg.III/28);
(PR) 5.2.2.106 confirming that a decision support system is provided for the master
(SOLAS 74/88 reg.III/29) (SOLAS 74/06 regs.II-2/21 and 22);
(PR) 5.2.2.107 testing that the engine of the rescue boat(s) and of each lifeboat, when
so fitted, start satisfactorily and operate both ahead and astern;
(PR) 5.2.2.108 examining and checking the operation of two-way VHF radiotelephone
apparatus and search and rescue locating devices (SOLAS 74/88/08
regs.III/6, IV/7 and 14);
(PR) 5.2.2.109 examining the line-throwing appliance and checking that its rockets and
the ship's distress signals are not out of date (SOLAS 74/96 regs.III/6, 18
and 35; LSA Code sections 3.1 and 7.1);
(PR) 5.2.2.111 examining the provision, disposition, stowage and condition of the
lifebuoys, including those fitted with self-igniting lights, self-activating
smoke signals and buoyant lines, lifejackets, * immersion suits,
anti-exposure suits and thermal protective aids and that their associated
batteries are not out of date (SOLAS 74/88/06 regs.III/7, 21, 22 and 26; LSA
Code sections 2.1 to 2.5 and 3.1 to 3.3);
(PR) 5.2.2.111.1 checking the provision of lifejackets in three sizes (Infant, Child, Adult)
and checking that they are marked by either weight or height, or by both
weight and height (LSA Code section 2.2.1.1); for passenger ships on
voyages less than 24 h, checking that the number of infant lifejackets is
equal to at least 2.5% of the number of passengers on board and for
passenger ships on voyages 24 h or greater, checking that infant
lifejackets are provided for each infant on board (SOLAS 74/06
reg.III/7.2.1);
(PR) 5.2.2.111.2 checking that immersion suits designed to be worn in conjunction with a
lifejacket are suitably marked (LSA Code section 2.3.1);
(PR) 5.2.2.112 checking the lighting of the muster and embarkation stations and the
alleyways, stairways and exits giving access to the muster and
embarkation stations, including when supplied from the emergency
source of power (SOLAS 74/88 regs.II-1/42 and III/11);
(PR) 5.2.2.113 checking that the required navigation lights, shapes and sound signalling
equipment are in order (COLREG, rules 20 to 24, 27 to 30 and 33);
(PR) 5.2.2.114 checking the provision and specification of the following navigation
equipment as appropriate: daylight signalling lamp, magnetic compass,
transmitting heading device, gyro compass, gyro compass repeaters,
radar installation(s), electronic plotting aid, automatic tracking aid(s) or
automatic radar plotting aid(s), echo-sounding device, speed and
distance indicator, rudder angle indicator, propeller rate-of-revolution
indicator, variable pitch propeller pitch and operational mode indicator,
rate-of-turn indicator, heading or track control system, GNSS receiver,
terrestrial radio navigation system and sound reception system, a
pelorus or compass bearing device, means for correcting heading and
bearings, a BNWAS, as applicable, and ECDIS including backup
arrangements, as applicable; items that cannot be checked with the ship
in port should be verified from records (SOLAS 74/00/09/13 reg.V/19);
(PR) 5.2.2.115 checking for the provision, specification operation and annual
performance test of the voyage data recorder (SOLAS 74/00/04
reg.V/20);
(PR) 5.2.2.116 checking that the International Code of Signals and an up-to-date copy
of Volume III of the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and
Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual have been provided (SOLAS 74/00/02
reg.V/21);
PR) 5.2.2.117 checking that a valid conformance test report of the long-range
identification and tracking system is available on board, where fitted
(SOLAS 74/04 reg.V/19-1);
(PR) 5.2.2.118 checking the provision and operation of the automatic identification
system, where fitted, and whether the annual test has been carried out
and a copy of the test report is on board (SOLAS 74/00/04/10
regs.V/18.9 and 19);
(PR) 5.2.2.119 checking the provision and specification of the pilot ladders and pilot
transfer arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/10 reg.V/23);
(PR) 5.2.2.120 checking the provisions of (PI) 5.1.3.117 to (PI) 5.1.3.142 and
(PI) 5.1.3.145 to (PI) 5.1.3.147;
(PR) 5.2.2.121 confirming that no new materials containing asbestos were installed
on board (SOLAS 74/00/05/09 reg.II-1/3-5);*
(PR) 5.2.2.122 checking that the means of embarkation and disembarkation from ships
for use in port and in port-related operations, such as gangways and
accommodation ladders, are in satisfactory condition, as applicable
(SOLAS 74/08 reg.II-1/3-9); and
(PR) 5.2.3 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships using natural
gas as fuel the additional requirements for the renewal survey should
consist of:
(PR) 5.2.3.1 examining the log-books and operating records with regard to correct
functioning of the gas detection systems, fuel supply/gas systems, etc.
(IGF Code ch.16);
(PR) 5.2.3.3 confirming gas detection and other leakage detection equipment in
compartments containing fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply
equipment or components or associated systems, including indicators and
alarms, is in satisfactory operating condition (IGF Code chs.6 and 15);
(PR) 5.2.3.4 confirming the satisfactory operation of the control, monitoring and
automatic shutdown systems of the fuel supply and bunkering systems
(IGF Code ch.15);
(PR) 5.2.3.5 confirming the availability of test and calibration records of the gas
detection systems (IGF Code ch.15);
(PR) 5.2.3.6 examining piping, hoses, emergency shutdown valves, remote operating
valves, relief valves, machinery and equipment for fuel storage, fuel
bunkering, and fuel supply such as venting, compressing, refrigerating,
liquefying, heating, cooling or otherwise handling the fuel, means for
inerting (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 15);
(PR) 5.2.3.7 testing the shutdown of ESD protected machinery spaces operationally,
as far as practicable (IGF Code ch.5);
(PR) 5.2.3.10 testing, as far as practicable, alarms, such as differential pressure and
loss of pressure alarms (IGF Code ch.15);
(PR) 5.2.3.11 examining portable and fixed drip trays and insulation (IGF Code ch.5);
(PR) 5.2.3.13 examining condition and arrangement of fuel storage, bunkering and supply
systems including external examination of storage tank including secondary
barrier if fitted and relief valves if accessible, verification of satisfactory
operation of tank monitoring system, examination and testing of installed
bilge alarms and means of drainage (IGF Code chs.6, 8, and 15);
(PR) 5.2.3.14 testing of the remote and local closing of the installed main tank valve
(IGF Code chs.6 and 10);
(PR) 5.2.3.15 examining bunkering stations and the fuel bunkering system including
operation of the fuel bunkering control, monitoring and shutdown
systems (IGF Code ch.8);
(PR) 5.2.3.16 examining the Ship-shore link (SSL) or equivalent means for automatic
and manual ESD communication to the bunkering source (IGF Code
para.8.5.7);
(PR) 5.2.3.17 examining the fuel supply system including the fuel supply system
control, monitoring and shutdown systems (IGF Code chs.9 and 15);
(PR) 5.2.3.18 testing of the remote and local closing of the master fuel valve for each
engine compartment (IGF Code chs.5, 9 and 15);
(PR) 5.2.3.19 testing gas detectors, temperature sensors, pressure sensors, level
indicators, and other equipment providing input to the fuel safety system
including proper response of the fuel safety system upon fault conditions
(IGF Code ch.15);
(PR) 5.2.3.20 examining the storage tanks and all associated piping for fuel storage,
fuel bunkering, and fuel supply such as venting, compressing,
refrigerating, liquefying, heating storing, burning or otherwise handling
the fuel and liquid nitrogen installations, and requiring removal of
insulation from the piping and opening for examination and hydrostatic
test of suspected pipeline as necessary, and leak test of complete piping
after reassembly (IGF Code chs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10);
(PR) 5.2.3.21 examining emergency shutdown valves, check valves, block and bleed
valves, master gas valves, remote operating valves, isolating valves for
pressure relief valves in the fuel storage, fuel bunkering, and fuel supply
piping systems, with randomly selected valves being opened for
examination (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 7, 9, 15 and 16);
(PR) 5.2.3.22 examining pressure relief valves connected to fuel storage tanks and
connected pipes and venting system, with PRV being opened for
examination, adjusted and function tested (IGF Code ch.6);
(PR) 5.2.3.23 examining and testing pressure relief valves in fuel supply/bunker lines,
including valves being opened for internal examination and testing; the
number of valves being opened up for internal examination and being
tested should include all PRVs that were not internally examined and tested
in the past 5 years and a random selection of PRVs that were internally
examined and tested in the past 5 years provided satisfactory records of
overhaul and testing of these PRVs are available (IGF Code ch.6);
(PR) 5.2.3.25 examining fuel storage tanks internally in accordance with an approved
survey plan (IGF Code ch.6);
(PR) 5.2.3.26 examining and testing of spill protection and water spray systems, for
portable liquefied gas fuel tanks located on open deck (IGF Code
para.6.5.2);
(PR) 5.2.3.27 examining and testing the thermal oxidation system if any (IGF Code
para.6.9.4);
(PR) 5.2.3.28 examining and NDE testing the low temperature steel shielding at the
bunker station if any (IGF Code para.8.3.1.6);
(PR) 5.2.3.29 examining fuel pumps, compressors, process pressure vessels, inert
gas generators, heat exchangers and other components used in
connection with fuel handling (IGF Code chs.5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 15);
(PR) 5.2.3.31 examining and testing gas detectors, temperature sensors, pressure
sensors, level indicators, and other equipment providing input to the fuel
safety system, including verification of the response upon fault
conditions, and the calibrations of pressure, temperature and level
indicating equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's
requirements (IGF Code ch.15)*;
(PR) 5.2.3.32 examining the arrangements for the fire protection and fire extinction
(IGF Code ch.11);
(PR) 5.2.3.33 examining the fire pump capacity and working pressure in relation to
water spray system, if the water spray system is part of the fire main
system (IGF Code para.11.4.1);
(PR) 5.2.3.34 examining the isolating valves of the fire main, when the fuel storage
tank(s) is located on the open deck (IGF Code para.11.4.2);
(PR) 5.2.3.35 examining the water spray system arrangement for fuel storage tanks(s)
on open deck including remote operation (IGF Code section 11.5);
(PR) 5.2.3.36 examining the fixed dry chemical powder fire-extinguishing system for
the bunkering station area (IGF Code para.11.6.1);
(PR) 5.2.3.37 examining the portable dry powder extinguisher (IGF Code para.11.6.2);
(PR) 5.2.3.38 examining the fixed fire detection and alarm system (IGF Code sections
11.7, 15.9);
(PR) 5.2.3.39 checking the records about drills and emergency exercises (IGF Code
ch.17); and
(PR) 5.2.3.40 checking the pre-bunkering verification records according to the bunker
safety checklist (IGF Code ch.18).
(PR) 5.2.4 For the hull, machinery and equipment of passenger ships the
completion of the renewal survey should consist of:
(PR) 5.2.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the Passenger Ship Safety Certificate
and its associated Record of Equipment (Form P).
* Where applicable, refer to the Unified interpretations of the IGF Code (MSC.1/Circ. 1591).
ANNEX 2
(LI) 1.1.1 For the load line the examination of plans and designs should consist of:
(LI) 1.1.1.1 examining the structural strength at the draft corresponding to the
assigned freeboard (LLC 66/88 reg.1);
(LI) 1.1.1.2 examining the intact stability, and, where applicable, the damaged
stability information and the loading and ballasting information that is to
be supplied to the master, and, where not dispensed by the
Administration, inclining experimental data (LLC 66/88/08 regs.1
and 10; IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3); and
(LI) 1.1.1.3 determining the freeboard, including specifying and considering the
conditions of assignment for the freeboard (LLC 66/88/03 regs.11 to 45).
(LI) 1.1.2 For the load line the survey during construction and after installation
should consist of:
(LI) 1.1.2.1 checking that, as far as its strength is concerned, the ship has been
constructed in accordance with the approved plans (LLC 66/88 reg.1);
(LI) 1.1.2.2 confirming that the deck line and load line mark are properly positioned
(LLC 66/88 regs.4 to 9);
(LI) 1.1.2.3 witnessing the inclining experiment or lightweight survey (LLC 66/88/03
reg.10);
(LI) 1.1.2.4 examining the superstructure end bulkheads and the openings therein
(LLC 66/88 regs.11 and 12);
(LI) 1.1.2.6 examining the ventilators and air pipes, including their coamings and
closing appliances (LLC 66/88 regs.19 and 20);
(LI) 1.1.2.7 examining the watertight integrity of the closures to any openings in the
ship's side below the freeboard deck (LLC 66/88 reg.21);
(LI) 1.1.2.8 examining the scuppers, inlets and discharges (LLC 66/88/03 reg.22);
(LI) 1.1.2.10 examining the spurling pipes and cable lockers (LLC 66/88/03 reg.22-2);
(LI) 1.1.2.11 examining the sidescuttles and deadlights (LLC 66/88 reg.23);
(LI) 1.1.2.12 examining the bulwarks including the provision of freeing ports, special
attention being given to any freeing ports fitted with shutters
(LLC 66/88/03 regs.24 and 25);
(LI) 1.1.2.13 examining the guardrails, gangways, walkways and other means
provided for the protection of the crew and means for safe passage of
the crew (LLC 66/88/03 regs.25 and 25-1);
(LI) 1.1.2.14 examining the special requirements for ships permitted to sail with type
"A" or type "B-minus" freeboards (LLC 66/88/03 regs.26 and 27); and
(LI) 1.1.2.15 checking, when applicable, the fittings and appliances for timber deck
cargoes (LLC 66/88 regs.42 to 45).
(LI) 1.1.3 For the load line the check that certificates, etc., have been placed on
board should consist of:
(LI) 1.1.3.1 checking that the loading and ballasting information has been supplied
to the master (LLC 66/88 reg.10).
(LI) 1.1.4 For the load line the completion of the initial survey should consist of:
(LI) 1.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Load Line Certificate
or International Load Line Exemption Certificate.
(LA) 1.2.1 For the load line the examination of current certificates and other
records should consist of:
(LA) 1.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.2 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(LA) 1.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.6 checking the certificate of class, if the ship is classed with a classification
society;
(LA) 1.2.1.7 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(LA) 1.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(LA) 1.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(LA) 1.2.1.10 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.12 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(LA) 1.2.1.13 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(LA) 1.2.1.15 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.16 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(LA) 1.2.1.17 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(LA) 1.2.1.18 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so, confirm
that it has been approved before installation and that any changes are
reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(LA) 1.2.1.19 checking that the stability and, where applicable, the loading and
ballasting information is available (LLC 66/88/08 regs.1 and 10;
IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3); and
(LA) 1.2.2 For the load line the annual survey should consist of:
(LA) 1.2.2.1 checking, in general, that there has been no deterioration in the strength
of the hull (LLC 66/88 reg.1);
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(LA) 1.2.2.2 checking the positions of the deck line and load line which, if necessary,
are to be re-marked and re-painted (LLC 66/88 regs.4 to 9);
(LA) 1.2.2.3 checking that no alterations have been made to the hull or
superstructures that would affect the calculations determining the
position of the load lines (LLC 66/88 regs.11 to 45);
(LA) 1.2.2.4 examining the superstructure end bulkheads and the openings therein
(LLC 66/88 regs.11 and 12);
(LA) 1.2.2.6 examining the ventilators and air pipes, including their coamings and
closing appliances (LLC 66/88 regs.19 and 20);
(LA) 1.2.2.7 examining the watertight integrity of the closures to any openings in the
ship's side below the freeboard deck (LLC 66/88 reg.21);
(LA) 1.2.2.8 examining the scuppers, inlets and discharges (LLC 66/88 reg.22);
(LA) 1.2.2.10 examining the means provided to minimize water ingress through the
spurling pipes and chain lockers (LLC 66/88/03 reg.22-2);
(LA) 1.2.2.11 examining the sidescuttles and deadlights (LLC 66/88 reg.23);
(LA) 1.2.2.12 examining the bulwarks including the provision of freeing ports, special
attention being given to any freeing ports fitted with shutters
(LLC 66/88/03 regs.24 and 25);
(LA) 1.2.2.13 examining the guardrails, gangways, walkways and other means
provided for the protection of the crew and means for safe passage of
the crew (LLC 66/88/03 regs.25 and 25-1);
(LA) 1.2.2.14 examining the special requirements for ships permitted to sail with type
"A" or type "B-minus" freeboards (LLC 66/88/03 regs.26 and 27); and
(LA) 1.2.2.15 checking, when applicable, the fittings and appliances for timber deck
cargoes (LLC 66/88 regs.42 to 45).
(LA) 1.2.3 For the load line the completion of the annual survey should consist of:
(LA) 1.2.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsement of the International Load Line
Certificate or International Load Line Exemption Certificate; and
(LA) 1.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(LR) 1.3.1 For the load line the examination of current certificates and other
records should consist of:
(LR) 1.3.1.1 the provisions of (LA) 1.2.1, except for the validity of the International
Load Line Certificate or International Load Line Exemption Certificate.
(LR) 1.3.2 For the load line the renewal survey should consist of:
(LR) 1.3.2.2 examining the hull to ensure that its strength is sufficient for the draft
corresponding to the freeboard assigned (LLC 66/88 reg.1).
(LR) 1.3.3 For the load line the completion of the renewal survey should consist of:
(LR) 1.3.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Load Line Certificate
or International Load Line Exemption Certificate.
ANNEX 3
SURVEY GUIDELINES UNDER THE MARPOL CONVENTION
(O) 1 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL OIL POLLUTION
PREVENTION CERTIFICATE
(OI) 1.1 Initial surveys – see part "General", section 4.1
(OI) 1.1.1 For oil pollution prevention the examination of plans and designs should
consist of:
(OI) 1.1.1.1 examining the arrangements for the control of the discharge of oil and
examining the plans and designs of the oil discharge monitoring and
control system and oily-water separating and oil filtering equipment;
confirming that pollution prevention equipment is type-approved in
accordance with the relevant resolution (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I
regs.14 & 15);
(OI) 1.1.1.2 examining the arrangements for operation in special areas
(MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I reg.15);
(OI) 1.1.1.3 examining the arrangements for the segregation of oil and water ballast
and the prohibition of carriage of oil in the forepeak tanks or in spaces
forward of the collision bulkhead (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.16);
(OI) 1.1.1.4 examining the oil residue (sludge) tank and standard discharge
arrangements (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.12 and 13, and where
applicable, Polar Code part II-A/para.1.2.4);
(OI) 1.1.1.5 examining oil fuel tank protection arrangements (MARPOL 90/04
Annex I reg.12A, and where applicable, Polar Code part II-A/para.1.2.1);
(OI) 1.1.1.6 confirming that requirements regarding capacity and protection of oil fuel
tanks are complied with (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.12A, and where
applicable, Polar Code part II-A/para.1.2.1); and
(OI) 1.1.1.7 examining the shipboard oil pollution emergency plan or in the case of a
chemical/product tanker the shipboard marine pollution emergency plan
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37, and where applicable, Polar Code
part II-A/para.1.1.4).
(OI) 1.1.2 For oil pollution prevention, concerning the additional requirements for
oil tankers the examination of plans and designs should consist of:
(OI) 1.1.2.1 examining the ODME Manual and the arrangements for the control of
the discharge of oil and for the retention of oil on board; verifying that the
ODME is type-approved in accordance with the relevant resolution
(MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.29, 31 and 34);
(OI) 1.1.2.2 examining the arrangements for operation in special areas
(MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I reg.34);
(OI) 1.1.2.3 examining the arrangements for the segregated ballast tanks, checking
their capacity and ascertaining whether the draft and trim conditions will
be met (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OI) 1.1.2.4 examining the arrangements for crude oil washing, including shadow
diagrams and the Operations and Equipment Manual, checking that an
inert gas system is to be fitted (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.33 and 35);
(OI) 1.1.2.5 examining, as appropriate, the arrangements for the prevention of oil
pollution in the event of collision or stranding (MARPOL 90/04/14
Annex I regs.19 to 22, and where applicable, Polar Code
part II A/paras. 1.2.2 and 1.2.3);
(OI) 1.1.2.6 examining the protective location of the segregated ballast spaces and
the arrangements for minimizing pollution due to side and bottom
damages (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.18, and 24 to 26);
(OI) 1.1.2.7 confirming, as appropriate, that arrangements are made for the
maintenance and inspection of wing and double bottom tanks or spaces
(MARPOL 90/04/14 Annex I reg.19);
(OI) 1.1.2.8 examining the arrangements for cargo pump-room bottom protection
(double bottom where required) (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.22);
(OI) 1.1.2.11 examining, for oil tankers of 5,000 tonnes deadweight and above
delivered on or after 1 February 2002, the intact stability
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I, reg.27);
(OI) 1.1.2.12 examining, for oil tankers of 150 gross tonnage and above delivered
after 31 December 1979, the subdivision and damage stability
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.28);
(OI) 1.1.3 For oil pollution prevention the survey during construction and after
installation should consist of:
(OI) 1.1.3.1 confirming the satisfactory installation and operation of, as appropriate,
oil filtering equipment and when appropriate the operation of the
automatic means provided to stop the discharge of effluent and the
satisfactory operation of the alarm – or other installation
(MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.14 and 15);
(OI) 1.1.3.2 confirming, when applicable, that the oil content meter and its recording
device are operable and that there is a sufficient supply of consumables
for the recording device on board (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.14
and 15);
(OI) 1.1.3.3 testing, where fitted, the automatic stopping device required for
discharges in Special Areas (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I reg.15);
(OI) 1.1.3.4 confirming the segregation of the oil fuel and water ballast system and
the non-carriage of oil in forepeak tanks (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I
reg.16);
(OI) 1.1.3.5 confirming that the oil residue (sludge) tank and its discharge
arrangements are satisfactory and, when the size of the sludge tank is
approved on the basis of such installations, confirming the satisfactory
operation of homogenizers, sludge incinerators or other recognized
means for the control of sludge (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I reg.12, and
where applicable, Polar Code part II-A/para.1.2.4);
(OI) 1.1.3.7 confirming oil fuel tank protection arrangements (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I
reg.12A, and where applicable, Polar Code part II-A/para.1.2.1).
(OI) 1.1.4 For oil pollution prevention, concerning the additional requirements for
oil tankers the survey during construction and after installation should
consist of:
(OI) 1.1.4.1 confirming that the arrangements of slop tanks or cargo tanks
designated as slop tanks, and associated piping systems, are
satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.29 and 34);
(OI) 1.1.4.2 confirming the satisfactory installation and operation of the oil discharge
monitoring and control system, including any audible or visual alarms,
the automatic and manual means to stop the discharge of effluent, the
starting interlock, the accuracy of the flow meter and the applicable
resolution's requirements for installation survey * (MARPOL 90/04/15
Annex I regs.31 and 34);
(OI) 1.1.4.3 confirming that the oil content meter and its recording device are
operable and that there is a sufficient supply of consumables for the
recording device on board (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.31 and 34);
(OI) 1.1.4.4 confirming that the approved oil/water interface detectors are on board
and are operational (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.32);
(OI) 1.1.4.5 confirming that the arrangements of pumps, pipes and valves are in
accordance with the requirements for segregated ballast systems and
that there are no cross-connections between the cargo and segregated
ballast systems (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
* Refer to the Revised guidelines and specifications for oil discharge monitoring and control systems for oil
tankers (Resolution A.586(14)), as amended, or the Revised guidelines and specifications for oil discharge
monitoring and control systems for oil tankers (resolution MEPC.108(49)), as amended, as applicable.
(OI) 1.1.4.6 where a portable spool piece is provided for the emergency discharge
of segregated ballast by connecting the segregated ballast system to a
cargo pump, confirming that non-return valves are fitted on the
segregated ballast connections and that the spool piece is mounted in a
conspicuous position in the pump-room with a permanent notice
restricting its use (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OI) 1.1.4.7 testing ballast pipelines that pass through cargo tanks and those cargo
pipelines that pass through ballast tanks to ensure there is no cross
contamination (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OI) 1.1.4.8 confirming that the crude oil washing system is installed in accordance
with the approved plans (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.18 and 33) and,
in particular:
(OI) 1.1.4.8.1 examining crude oil washing piping, pumps, valves and deck-mounted
washing machines for signs of leakage and to check that all anchoring
devices for crude oil washing piping are intact and secure;
(OI) 1.1.4.8.2 carrying out pressure testing of the crude oil washing system to 1.5 times
the working pressure;
(OI) 1.1.4.8.3 confirming in those cases where drive units are not integral with the tank
washing machines that the number of operational drive units specified
in the Manual are on board;
(OI) 1.1.4.8.4 checking that, when fitted, steam heaters for water washing can be
properly isolated during crude oil washing operations, either by double
shut-off valves or by clearly identifiable blanks;
(OI) 1.1.4.8.5 checking that the prescribed means of communication between the deck
watchkeeper and the cargo control position is operational;
(OI) 1.1.4.8.6 confirming that an overpressure relief device (or other approved
arrangement) is fitted to the pumps supplying the crude oil washing
system;
(OI) 1.1.4.8.7 verifying that flexible hoses for supply of oil to the washing machines on
combination carriers are of an approved type, are properly stored and
are in good condition;
(OI) 1.1.4.9 verifying the effectiveness of the crude oil washing system
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33) and, in particular:
(OI) 1.1.4.9.1 checking that the crude oil washing machines are operable and
observing the proper operation of the washing machines by means of
the movement indicators and/or sound patterns or other approved
methods;
(OI) 1.1.4.9.2 checking the effectiveness of the stripping system in appropriate cargo
tanks by observing the monitoring equipment and by hand-dipping or
other approved means;
(OI) 1.1.4.9.3 verifying by internal tank inspection after crude oil washing that the
installation and operational procedures laid down in the Operations and
Equipment Manual are satisfactory;
(OI) 1.1.4.10 confirming that, where there is a crude oil washing system, an inert gas
system has been installed and tested in accordance with the
requirements of SOLAS 74/88/2000 (see (El) 1.1.5.2 in Annex 1);
(OI) 1.1.4.11 confirming, as appropriate, that the arrangements for the prevention of
oil pollution in the event of collision or stranding are in accordance with
the approved plans (MARPOL 90/04/14 Annex I regs.19 to 22,
Polar Code part II-A/paras. 1.2.2 and 1.2.3);
(OI) 1.1.4.12 confirming that the piping systems associated with the discharge of dirty
ballast water or oil-contaminated water are satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04
Annex I reg.30);
(OI) 1.1.4.13 confirming that the observation and discharge control positions for
visually observing the discharge of oil-contaminated water, including the
testing of the communication system between the two positions are
satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.30);
(OI) 1.1.4.14 confirming that the means of draining cargo pumps and cargo lines,
including the provision of a stripping device and the connections for
pumping to the slop or cargo tanks or ashore, are satisfactory
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.30);
(OI) 1.1.4.15 confirming that closing devices installed in the cargo transfer system and
cargo piping, as appropriate, are satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I
regs.23 and 26);
(OI) 1.1.4.16 confirming that the subdivision and stability arrangements, in addition to
the provision of (OI) 1.1.4.15, to prevent progressive flooding are
satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.23 and 26); and
(OI) 1.1.4.17 confirming the arrangements for cargo pump-room bottom protection
(double bottom where required) (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.22).
(OI) 1.1.5 For oil pollution prevention the check that the documentation has been
placed on board cargo ships should consist of:
(OI) 1.1.5.1 confirming that certificates for type approval for the oil filtering equipment
and oil content meters are available (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I
reg.14);
(OI) 1.1.5.2 confirming that the Oil Record Book (Part I) has been provided
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.17);
(OI) 1.1.5.3 confirming that the shipboard oil pollution emergency plan or, in the case
of a chemical/product tanker, a shipboard marine pollution emergency
plan has been provided (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37, and where
applicable, Polar Code part II-A/section 1.1); and
(OI) 1.1.6 For the oil pollution prevention the check that the documentation has
been placed on board oil tankers should additionally consist of:
(OI) 1.1.6.2 confirming that, if applicable, a Crude Oil Washing Operations and
Equipment Manual has been provided (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.35);
(OI) 1.1.6.3 confirming that an operations manual for the oil discharge monitoring
and control system has been provided together with any other
documentation requested by the applicable resolution* (MARPOL 90/04
Annex I reg.31);
(OI) 1.1.6.4 confirming that certificates for type approval for the oil content meters,
oil discharge monitoring and control system and oil/water interface
detectors are available (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.31 and 32);
(OI) 1.1.6.5 confirming that the Oil Record Book (Part II) has been provided
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.36);
(OI) 1.1.6.6 confirming that the information and data concerning the subdivision and
damage stability has been provided (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.28);
(OI) 1.1.6.7 confirming that the shipboard oil pollution emergency plan or in the case
of a chemical/product tanker a shipboard marine pollution emergency
plan has been provided (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37, and where
applicable, Polar Code part II-A/section 1.1);
(OI) 1.1.6.8 confirming, for oil tankers of 5,000 tonnes deadweight and above
delivered on/after 1 February 2002, that the intact stability has been
approved (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.27);
(OI) 1.1.6.9 confirming, for oil tankers of 5,000 tonnes deadweight and above, that
arrangements are in place to provide prompt access to shore-based
damage stability and residual structural strength computerized
calculation programs (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37.4);
(OI) 1.1.6.10 confirming, where applicable, the stability instrument has been approved
and is operating satisfactorily (MARPOL 90/04/14 Annex I reg.28); and
* Refer to Revised guidelines and specifications for oil discharge monitoring and control systems for oil tankers
(resolution A.586(14)), as amended, or the Revised guidelines and specifications for oil discharge monitoring
and control systems for oil tankers (resolution MEPC.108(49)), as amended, as applicable.
(OI) 1.1.7 For oil pollution prevention the completion of the initial survey should
consist of:
(OI) 1.1.7.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate.
(OA) 1.2.1 For oil pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(OA) 1.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.2 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.4 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(OA) 1.2.1.5 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.6 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(OA) 1.2.1.7 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(OA) 1.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(OA) 1.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.10 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(OA) 1.2.1.11 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(OA) 1.2.1.13 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.14 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the Safety Management
Certificate (SMC) and that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC)
is on board;
(OA) 1.2.1.15 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.16 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.17 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(OA) 1.2.1.18 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(OA) 1.2.1.19 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(OA) 1.2.1.20 checking the certificates for the type approval of the oil filtering
equipment (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.14 and 15);
(OA) 1.2.1.21 checking, when appropriate, that the Operating and Maintenance
Manuals for the 15 ppm bilge separator and 15 ppm bilge alarm are
available on board;
(OA) 1.2.1.22 verifying, if applicable, that the 15 ppm bilge alarm has been calibrated
by the manufacturer or a person authorized by the manufacturer and that
a valid calibration certificate is available on board;*
(OA) 1.2.1.23 checking whether the appropriate entries have been made in Part I of
the Oil Record Book (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.17, and where
applicable, Polar Code part II-A/section 1.1);
OA) 1.2.1.25 confirming that the oil pollution emergency plan or, in the case of a
chemical/product tanker, a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan, is
on board (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37, and where applicable, Polar
Code part II-A/section 1.1).
(OA) 1.2.2 For oil pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records for oil tankers should additionally consist of:
* Applicable for installations complying with the Revised guidelines and specifications for pollution prevention
equipment for machinery space bilges of ships (resolution MEPC.107(49)), as amended.
(OA) 1.2.2.1 confirming that the approved Dedicated Clean Ballast Tank Operation
Manual, and/or the approved Operations and Equipment Manual for the
Crude Oil Washing Systems, as appropriate, is/are on board
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.18 and 35);
(OA) 1.2.2.3 confirming that the operating and maintenance manual for the oil
discharge monitoring and control system, is on board (MARPOL 90/04
Annex I reg.31);
(OA) 1.2.2.4 confirming that a valid calibration certificate for the oil discharge
monitoring equipment is available on board;†
(OA) 1.2.2.5 checking whether the appropriate entries have been made in Part II of
the Oil Record Book (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.36, and where
applicable, Polar Code part II-A/section 1.1);
(OA) 1.2.2.6 confirming that for oil tankers of 5,000 tonnes deadweight and above
delivered on/after 1 February 2002 the loading conditions and intact
stability information, in an approved form, is on board (MARPOL 90/04
Annex I reg.27);
(OA) 1.2.2.7 confirming that subdivision and damage stability information in an
approved form, where applicable, is on board (MARPOL 90/04/14
Annex I reg.28);
(OA) 1.2.2.8 checking the certificates for the type approval of the oil pollution
prevention equipment, such as the oil content meters and oil/water
interface detectors, and sighting the records of the various oil discharge
monitoring equipment, as applicable (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.31);
(OA) 1.2.2.9 checking that the ship is allowed continued operation according to the
phase-out scheme of MARPOL 90/04/14 Annex I reg.20);
(OA) 1.2.2.10 confirming that, if applicable, a ship-to-ship (STS) operations plan
approved by the Administration has been provided (MARPOL Annex I
reg.41);
(OA) 1.2.2.11 confirming, where applicable, the approved stability instrument is
available on board and operating satisfactorily (MARPOL 90/04/14
Annex I reg.28); and
(OA) 1.2.2.12 confirming, when carriage of a stability instrument is waived, the
alternative means of verification for intact and damage stability recorded
on Form B attached to the IOPP Certificate is available on board and is
being applied effectively (MARPOL 90/04/14Annex I reg.3).
(OA) 1.2.3 For the oil pollution prevention the annual survey should consist of:
(OA) 1.2.3.1 examining externally the oil filtering equipment and confirming, as far as
practicable, its satisfactory operation including, when appropriate,
testing the operation of the automatic means provided to stop the
discharge of effluent and the alarm for the oil filtering equipment
(MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.14 and 15);
(OA) 1.2.3.2 testing, where fitted, the oil filtering equipment required for discharge in
special areas (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I reg.15);
(OA) 1.2.3.3 confirming the segregation of oil fuel and water ballast systems and that
the arrangements prohibit the carriage of oil in forepeak tanks or in
spaces forward of the collision bulkhead (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I
reg.16);
(OA) 1.2.3.4 checking that the arrangement of oil residue (sludge) tank and its
discharge arrangements are satisfactory and confirming that, where
applicable, homogenizers, sludge incinerators or other recognized
means for the control of sludge are satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04/15
Annex I reg.12, and where applicable, Polar Code part II-A/para.1.2.4);
and
(OA) 1.2.4 For oil pollution prevention the annual survey of the additional
requirements for oil tankers should consist of:
(OA) 1.2.4.1 examining the oil discharge monitoring and control system and its
associated equipment (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.31) and, in
particular:
(OA) 1.2.4.1.1 examining externally the system and equipment and, if applicable,
verifying that the instrument is properly sealed;
(OA) 1.2.4.1.2 confirming, as far as practicable, the satisfactory operation of the oil
discharge monitoring and control system including the oil content meter
and, where applicable, the automatic and manual means provided to
stop the discharge of effluent and the starting interlock;
(OA) 1.2.4.1.3 observing that indicators and recording devices are operable and
verifying that a sufficient supply of consumables for the recorders is on
board; and
(OA) 1.2.4.1.4 testing, as far as practicable, any audible or visual alarms fitted to the oil
discharge monitoring and control system;
(OA) 1.2.4.3 confirming that no cross-connections have been fitted between the
cargo and segregated ballast systems (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OA) 1.2.4.4 where a portable spool piece is provided for the emergency discharge
of segregated ballast by connecting the segregated ballast system to a
cargo pump, confirming that non-return valves are fitted on the
(OA) 1.2.4.5 confirming by sighting that there has been no contamination with oil in
the segregated ballast tanks (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OA) 1.2.4.6 confirming, as far as practicable, that the dedicated clean ballast tank
arrangement remains satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OA) 1.2.4.7 confirming by sighting that there has been no contamination with oil in
the dedicated clean ballast tanks (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OA) 1.2.4.8 confirming, as far as practicable, that the crude oil washing system
remains satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33) and, in particular:
(OA) 1.2.4.8.1 examining externally the crude oil washing piping, pumps, valves and
deck-mounted washing machines for signs of leakage and checking that
all anchoring devices for crude oil washing piping are intact and secure;
(OA) 1.2.4.8.2 confirming, in those cases where drive units are not integral with the tank
cleaning machines, that the number of operational drive units as
specified in the Manual are on board;
(OA) 1.2.4.8.3 checking that, when fitted, steam heaters for water washing can be
properly isolated during crude oil washing operations, either by double
shut-off valves or clearly identifiable blanks;
(OA) 1.2.4.8.4 checking that the prescribed means of communications between the
deck watchkeeper and the cargo control position is operational;
(OA) 1.2.4.8.5 confirming that an overpressure relief device (or other approved
arrangement) is fitted to the pumps supplying the crude oil washing
systems;
(OA) 1.2.4.8.6 confirming that flexible hoses for the supply of oil to the washing
machines on combination carriers are of an approved type, are properly
stored and are in good condition;
(OA) 1.2.4.9 verifying, where applicable and as far as practicable, the effectiveness
of the crude oil washing system (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33) and,
in particular:
(OA) 1.2.4.9.1 checking tanks containing departure and/or arrival ballast water, as
applicable, to confirm the effectiveness of the cleaning and stripping;
(OA) 1.2.4.9.2 checking, as far as practicable, that the crude oil washing machines are
operable and, when the survey is carried out during crude oil washing
operations, observing the proper operation of the washing machines by
means of the movement indicators and/or sound patterns or other
approved methods;
(OA) 1.2.4.9.3 checking, as far as practicable, the effectiveness of the stripping system
in appropriate cargo tanks by observing the monitoring equipment and
by hand-dipping or other approved means;
(OA) 1.2.4.10 confirming that on those existing tankers operating with special ballast
arrangements the arrangements are as approved and are satisfactory
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OA) 1.2.4.11 confirming, as appropriate and as practicable, that the arrangements for
the prevention of oil pollution in the event of collision or stranding are
approved and are satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04/14 Annex I
regs.19 to 22, Polar Code part II-A/paras. 1.2.2 and 1.2.3);
(OA) 1.2.4.12 examining the piping systems associated with the discharge of dirty
ballast or oil-contaminated water including the part flow system, if fitted
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.30);
(OA) 1.2.4.13 testing the communication system between the observation and
discharge control positions (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.30);
(OA) 1.2.4.14 examining the means of draining cargo pumps and cargo lines, including
the stripping device and the connections for pumping to the slop or cargo
tanks or ashore (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.30); and
(OA) 1.2.4.15 confirming for oil tankers of 5,000 tonnes deadweight and above that
arrangements are in place to provide prompt access to shore-based
damage stability and residual structural strength computerized
calculation programs (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37.4).
(OA) 1.2.5 For oil pollution prevention the completion of the annual survey should
consist of:
(OA) 1.2.5.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate; and
(OA) 1.2.5.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(OIn) 1.3.1 For oil pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(OIn) 1.3.2 For oil pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records for oil tankers should additionally consist of:
(OIn) 1.3.3 For oil pollution prevention the intermediate survey should consist of:
(OIn) 1.3.3.2 examining the oily-water separating equipment or oil filtering equipment
or process unit, where fitted, including associated pumps, piping and
fittings for wear and corrosion (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.14
and 15); and
(OIn) 1.3.3.3 examining the oil content meter (15 ppm alarm and bilge monitor) for
obvious defects, deterioration or damage and checking the record of
calibration of the meter when done in accordance with the
manufacturer's operational and instruction manual (MARPOL 90/04/15
Annex I reg.14).
(OIn) 1.3.4 For oil pollution prevention the intermediate survey of the additional
requirements for oil tankers should consist of:
(OIn) 1.3.4.1 the provisions of (OA) 1.2.4;
(OIn) 1.3.4.2 examining the oil discharge monitoring and control system and the oil
content meter for obvious defects, deterioration or damage, and
checking the record of calibration of the meter when done in accordance
with the manufacturer's operational and instruction manual
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.31);
(OIn) 1.3.4.3 confirming the satisfactory operation of the oil/water interface detectors
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.32);
(OIn) 1.3.4.4 for the crude oil washing system (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33):
(OIn) 1.3.4.4.1 examining the crude oil washing piping outside the cargo tanks; if upon
examination there is any doubt as to its condition, the piping may be
required to be pressure tested, gauged or both; particular attention
should be paid to any repairs such as welded doublers;
(OIn) 1.3.4.4.2 confirming the satisfactory operation of the isolation valves to steam
heaters for washing water, when fitted;
(OIn) 1.3.4.4.3 examining at least two selected cargo tanks for the express purpose of
verifying the continued effectiveness of the installed crude oil washing
and stripping systems; if a tank cannot be gas freed for the safe entry of
the surveyor, an internal examination of it should not be conducted, in
which case the verification is to be made by another alternative method
acceptable to the Administration; an acceptable alternative would be
satisfactory results during the surveys required by (OA) 1.2.4.9
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33); and
(OIn) 1.3.4.5 examining the manual and/or remote operation of the individual tank
valves (or other similar closing devices) to be kept closed at sea
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.23 and 26).
(OIn) 1.3.5 For the oil pollution prevention the completion of the intermediate survey
should consist of:
(OIn) 1.3.5.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate; and
(OIn) 1.3.5.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(OR) 1.4.1 For oil pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(OR) 1.4.1.1 the provisions of (OA) 1.2.1, except for the validity of the International
Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate; and
(OR) 1.4.1.2 verifying that, if applicable, the 15 ppm bilge alarm has been calibrated
by the manufacturer or a person authorized by the manufacturer and that
a valid calibration certificate is available on board.*
(OR) 1.4.2 For oil pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records for tankers should additionally consist of:
(OR) 1.4.2.2 verifying that, if applicable, the oil discharge monitoring equipment has
been calibrated and that a valid calibration certificate is available on
board.†
(OR) 1.4.3 For oil pollution prevention the renewal survey should consist of:
(OR) 1.4.3.4 confirming the satisfactory operation of the alarm for the oil filtering
system (MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I reg.14); and
(OR) 1.4.4 For oil pollution prevention the renewal survey of the additional
requirements for oil tankers should consist of:
* Applicable for installations complying with the Revised guidelines and specifications for pollution prevention
equipment for machinery space bilges of ships (resolution MEPC.107(49)), as amended.
† Applicable for installations complying with the Revised guidelines and specifications for oil discharge
monitoring and control systems for oil tankers (resolution MEPC.108(49)), as amended.
(OR) 1.4.4.2 confirming that the arrangements of slop tanks or cargo tanks
designated as slop tanks and associated piping systems are satisfactory
(MARPOL 90/04/15 Annex I regs.29 and 34);
(OR) 1.4.4.4 confirming that the arrangements of pumps, pipes and valves are in
accordance with the requirements for SBT systems (MARPOL 90/04
Annex I reg.18);
(OR) 1.4.4.5 confirming that the arrangements of pumps, pipes and valves are in
accordance with the Revised specifications for oil tankers with dedicated
clean ballast tanks (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.18);
(OR) 1.4.4.6 confirming that the crude oil washing system is in accordance with the
requirements for such systems (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33) and, in
particular:
(OR) 1.4.4.6.1 carrying out pressure testing of the crude oil washing system to at least
the working pressure;
(OR) 1.4.4.6.2 examining the cargo tanks for the express purpose of verifying the
continued effectiveness of the installed crude oil washing and stripping
systems;
(OR) 1.4.4.6.3 examining internally, when fitted, the isolation valves for any steam
heaters;
(OR) 1.4.4.6.4 verifying, by internal tank inspection or by another alternative method
acceptable to the Administration, the effectiveness of the crude oil
washing system; if the tank cannot be gas freed for the safe entry of the
surveyor, an internal inspection should not be conducted; an acceptable
alternative would be satisfactory results during the surveys required by
(OA) 1.2.4.9 (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.33);
(OR) 1.4.4.7 confirming that there is no leakage from those ballast pipelines passing
through cargo tanks and those cargo pipelines passing through ballast
tanks (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I regs.18 and 33);
(OR) 1.4.4.8 confirming that the pumping, piping and discharge arrangements are
satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.30) and, in particular:
(OR) 1.4.4.8.1 confirming that the piping systems associated with the discharge of dirty
ballast water or oil contaminated water are satisfactory;
(OR) 1.4.4.8.2 confirming that the means of draining cargo pumps and cargo lines,
including the stripping device and the connections for pumping to the
slop or cargo tanks or ashore are satisfactory;
(OR) 1.4.4.8.3 confirming that the arrangements for the part flow system, where fitted,
are satisfactory;
(OR) 1.4.4.9 confirming that closing devices installed in the cargo transfer system and
cargo piping as appropriate are satisfactory (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I
regs.23 and 26);
(OR) 1.4.4.11 confirming for oil tankers of 5,000 tonnes deadweight and above that
arrangements are in place to provide prompt access to shore-based
damage stability and residual structural strength computerized
calculation programs (MARPOL 90/04 Annex I reg.37.4).
(OR) 1.4.5 For oil pollution prevention the completion of the renewal survey should
consist of:
(OR) 1.4.5.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate.
(NI) 2.1.1 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the examination of
plans and designs (as applicable to the cargoes the ship is to be certified
to carry) should consist of:
(NI) 2.1.1.1 drawing up the list of noxious liquid substances it is proposed the ship
will be certified to carry (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.6);
(NI) 2.1.1.2 examining the pumping system (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.12);
(NI) 2.1.1.3 examining the stripping system (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.12);
(NI) 2.1.1.4 examining the tank washing system and equipment (MARPOL 90/04
Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NI) 2.1.1.7 examining the heating system for solidifying and high viscosity
substances (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NI) 2.1.1.8 examining the Procedures and Arrangements Manual (including cargo
carriage requirements to meet Annex II regulations) (MARPOL 90/04
Annex II reg.14 and App.4 and where applicable, Polar Code
part II-A/ch.2, MEPC.1/Circ.856);
(NI) 2.1.2 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk, the survey during
construction and after installation (as applicable to the cargoes the ship
is to be certified to carry) should consist of:
(NI) 2.1.2.1 confirming that the pumping and stripping systems are satisfactory and
that portable pipes or bends in sufficient number, if required, are on
board (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.12);
(NI) 2.1.2.2 conducting the water test for assessing the stripping quantity, as
required (MARPOL73/78/90/04 Annex II reg.12 and App.5);
(NI) 2.1.2.3 confirming that the tank washing machines provided on board are in
working order, are those described in the Procedures and Arrangements
Manual and are installed in accordance with the approved plans
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NI) 2.1.2.4 confirming that the wash water heating system, if required, is installed in
accordance with the approved plans (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14
and App.4);
(NI) 2.1.2.5 confirming that the number and position of tank cleaning openings for
portable machines are in accordance with the approved plans
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NI) 2.1.2.6 confirming that the underwater discharge outlet(s) are in accordance
with the approved plans (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.12);
(NI) 2.1.2.7 verifying by actual test that the discharge rate of the pumps, where a
variable rate type is used, can be controlled as specified in the
Procedures and Arrangements Manual (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14
and App.4);
(NI) 2.1.2.8 confirming that the ventilation equipment for residue removal is installed
in accordance with the approved plan and is in working order and that
the pressure in the driving medium for portable fans for ventilation
equipment for residue removal can be achieved to give the required fan
capacity (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.13 and App.7);
(NI) 2.1.2.9 confirming that the heating system for solidifying and high viscosity
substances is installed in accordance with the approved plan
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4); and
(NI) 2.1.3 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the check that the
required documentation has been placed on board cargo ships
(as applicable to the cargoes the ship is to be certified to carry) should
consist of:
(NI) 2.1.3.1 confirming that the Procedures and Arrangements Manual has been
provided (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14, and where applicable, Polar
Code part II-A ch.2, MEPC.1/Circ.856);
(NI) 2.1.3.2 confirming that the Cargo Record Book has been provided
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.15, and where applicable, Polar Code
part II-A ch.2); and
(NI) 2.1.3.3 confirming that the shipboard marine pollution emergency plan is
provided (MARPOL 04 Annex II, reg.17, and where applicable, Polar
Code part II-A ch.2).
(NI) 2.1.4 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the completion of
the initial survey should consist of:
(NI) 2.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Certificate for the
Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk.
(NA) 2.2.1 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the examination of
current certificates and other records should consist of:
(NA) 2.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.2 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.4 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(NA) 2.2.1.5 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(NA) 2.2.1.6 checking the validity of the International Pollution Prevention Certificate
for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk;
(NA) 2.2.1.7 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.8 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(NA) 2.2.1.9 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(NA) 2.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.12 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the Safety Management
Certificate (SMC) and that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC)
is on board;
(NA) 2.2.1.13 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.14 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.15 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(NA) 2.2.1.16 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(NA) 2.2.1.17 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(NA) 2.2.1.18 confirming that the Procedures and Arrangements Manual is on board
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14, and where applicable, Polar Code part
II-A ch.2, MEPC.1/Circ.856);
(NA) 2.2.1.19 confirming that the Cargo Record Book is being correctly used
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.15, and where applicable, Polar Code part
II-A ch.2);
(NA) 2.2.1.20 confirming that the shipboard marine pollution emergency plan is on
board (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.17, and where applicable, Polar
Code part II-A ch.2); and
(NA) 2.2.2 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the annual survey
should consist of:
(NA) 2.2.2.1 examining externally and confirming that the pumping and piping
systems, including a stripping system if fitted, and associated equipment
remain as approved (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.12);
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(NA) 2.2.2.2 examining externally the tank washing piping and confirming that the
type, capacity, number and arrangement of the tank washing machines
are as approved (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NA) 2.2.2.3 examining externally the wash water heating system (MARPOL 90/04
Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NA) 2.2.2.5 confirming that the means of controlling the rate of discharge of the
residue is as approved (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NA) 2.2.2.6 confirming that the ventilation equipment for residue removal is as
approved (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.13 and App.7);
(NA) 2.2.3 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the completion of
the annual survey should consist of:
(NA) 2.2.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the International Certificate for the
Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk; and
(NA) 2.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General" section 4.8.
(NIn) 2.3.1 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the examination of
current certificates and other records should consist of:
(NIn) 2.3.2 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the intermediate
survey should consist of:
(NIn) 2.3.2.2 verifying from the Cargo Record Book that the pumping and stripping
arrangements have been emptying the tanks efficiently and are all in
working order (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II regs.12 and 15);
(NIn) 2.3.2.3 confirming, if possible, that the discharge outlet(s) are in good condition
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II P & A Standards); and
(NIn) 2.3.2.4 confirming that the ventilation equipment for residue removal is
satisfactory and that the pressure in the driving medium for portable fans
for ventilation equipment for residue removal can be achieved to give
the required fan capacity (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II App.7).
(NIn) 2.3.3 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the completion of
the intermediate survey should consist of:
(NIn) 2.3.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the International Certificate for the
Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk; and
(NIn) 2.3.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory, see part "General", section 4.8.
(NR) 2.4.1 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the examination of
current certificates and other records should consist of:
(NR) 2.4.1.1 the provisions of (NA) 2.2.1, except for the validity of the International
Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk.
(NR) 2.4.2 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the renewal survey
should consist of:
(NR) 2.4.2.2 confirming that the pumping and stripping systems are satisfactory and
that portable pipes or bends in sufficient number, if required, are on
board (MARPOL 73/78/90/04 Annex II reg.12);
(NR) 2.4.2.3 conducting the water test for assessing the stripping quantity, as
required (MARPOL 73/78/90/04 Annex II reg.12 and App.5);
(NR) 2.4.2.4 confirming that the tank washing machines provided on board are in
working order, are those described in the Procedures and Arrangements
Manual and are installed in accordance with the approved plans
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NR) 2.4.2.5 confirming that the wash water heating system, if required, is installed in
accordance with the approved plans and is in working order
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NR) 2.4.2.6 confirming that the number and position of tank cleaning openings for
portable machines are in accordance with the approved plans
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14 and App.4);
(NR) 2.4.2.7 confirming that the underwater discharge outlet(s) are in good condition
and are in accordance with the approved plans (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II
regs.12, 14 and App.4);
(NR) 2.4.2.8 verifying by actual test that the discharge rate of the pumps, where a
variable rate type is used, can be controlled as specified in the
Procedures and Arrangements Manual (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II reg.14
and App.4);
(NR) 2.4.2.9 confirming that the ventilation equipment for residue removal is installed
in accordance with the approved plan and is in working order
(MARPOL 90/04 Annex II regs.12, 14 and App.4); and
(NR) 2.4.2.10 confirming that the heating system for solidifying and high viscosity
substances is installed in accordance with the approved plan and is in
working order (MARPOL 90/04 Annex II regs.12, 14 and App.4).
(NR) 2.4.3 For the carriage of noxious liquid substances in bulk the completion of
renewal survey should consist of:
(NR) 2.4.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Certificate for the
Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk.
(SI) 3.1.1 For sewage pollution prevention the examination of plans and designs
should consist of:
(SI) 3.1.1.3 if a sewage comminuting and disinfecting system is fitted, checking that
it is approved by the Administration and that facilities for the temporary
storage of sewage are provided (MARPOL Annex IV, reg.9.1.2);
(SI) 3.1.1.4 if a sewage holding tank is fitted, checking its capacity having regard to
the number of persons on board (MARPOL Annex IV, regs.9.1.3
and 9.2.2);
(SI) 3.1.1.5 examining the arrangements for the provision of a standard discharge
connection (MARPOL Annex IV reg.10); and
(SI) 3.1.1.6 examining the arrangements for the provision of a pipeline for the
discharge of sewage to a reception facility (MARPOL Annex IV reg.10).
(SI) 3.1.2 For sewage pollution prevention the survey during construction and after
installation should consist of:
(SI) 3.1.2.1 checking externally, as applicable, the sewage treatment plant or the
sewage comminuting and disinfecting system, and confirming their
operation (MARPOL Annex IV, regs.4.1.1, 9.1.1, 9.1.2 and 9.2.1);
(SI) 3.1.2.2 if a sewage holding tank is fitted, checking that it has been constructed
in a satisfactory manner, and checking that the holding tank has a means
to indicate visually the amount of its contents (MARPOL Annex IV,
regs.9.1.3 and 9.2.2);
(SI) 3.1.2.4 confirming that a pipeline for the discharge of sewage to a reception
facility is provided ( MARPOL Annex IV reg.10).
(SR) 3.2.1 For sewage pollution prevention the examination of current certificates
and other records should consist of:
(SR) 3.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate or Passenger Ship Safety Certificate;
(SR) 3.2.1.2 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(SR) 3.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(SR) 3.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Air Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(SR) 3.2.1.5 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(SR) 3.2.1.6 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(SR) 3.2.1.8 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(SR) 3.2.1.9 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(SR) 3.2.1.10 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemical in Bulk;
(SR) 3.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(SR) 3.2.1.12 checking when appropriate the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(SR) 3.2.1.13 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(SR) 3.2.1.14 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(SR) 3.2.1.15 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board, where
applicable;
(SR) 3.2.1.16 checking, as appropriate, the validity of the Polar Ship Certificate;
(SR) 3.2.1.17 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so, confirm
that it has been approved before installation and that any changes are
reflected in the certificate; and
(SR) 3.2.2 For sewage pollution prevention the renewal survey should consist of:
(SR) 3.2.2.1 confirming that no change has been made nor any new equipment
installed which would affect the validity of the certificate (MARPOL
Annex IV reg.4.8);
(SR) 3.2.2.2 examining externally the sewage pollution prevention system and
confirming, as far as practicable, its satisfactory operation (MARPOL
Annex IV, reg.9);
(SR) 3.2.2.4 confirming, for ships where a sewage holding tank is fitted as a sewage
system, that an approval for the rate of discharge is available (MARPOL
Annex IV, regs.9.1.3 and 11.1.1).
(SR) 3.2.3 For sewage pollution prevention the completion of the renewal survey
should consist of:
(A) 4 GUIDELINES FOR THE SURVEYS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL AIR POLLUTION
PREVENTION CERTIFICATE AND THE NOX TECHNICAL CODE
(AI) 4.1.1 For air pollution prevention the examination of plans and designs should
consist of:
(AI) 4.1.1.2 examining the arrangements for NOX emission control, if applicable
(MARPOL Annex VI reg.13);
(AI) 4.1.1.3 examining the arrangements for SOX and particulate matter control, if
applicable (MARPOL Annex VI reg.14);
(AI) 4.1.1.5 examining the arrangements for vapour collection systems, if applicable
(MARPOL Annex VI reg.15 and MSC/Circ.585); and
(AI) 4.1.2 For air pollution prevention the survey should consist of:
(AI) 4.1.2.2 Nitrogen oxide emissions from marine diesel engines (MARPOL
Annex VI reg.13):
(AI) 4.1.2.2.1 confirming that all marine diesel engines which are required to be
certified are pre-certified in accordance with section 2.2 of the NOX
Technical Code to the required Tier and installed in accordance with the
approved duty cycle.
(AI) 4.1.2.2.1.1.1 an onboard verification survey in accordance with section 6.2 of the
NOX Technical Code;
(AI) 4.1.2.2.1.2.1 an onboard verification survey in accordance with section 6.3 of the
NOX Technical Code;
(AI) 4.1.2.2.1.3 If the direct measurement and monitoring method is used (for existing
ships only):
* Refer to the 2015 Guidelines for exhaust gas cleaning system (resolution MEPC.259(68)).
(AI) 4.1.2.2.1.3.1 an onboard verification survey, in accordance with section 6.4 of the
NOX Technical Code;
(AI) 4.1.2.2.1.4 For marine diesel engines of an output more than 5,000 kW and a per
cylinder displacement at or above 90 litres/cylinder installed on ships
constructed between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1999, check
whether *(MARPOL Annex VI reg.13.7.3):
(AI) 4.1.2.3 Sulphur oxides and particulate matter (MARPOL Annex VI reg.14):
(AI) 4.1.2.4 Volatile organic compounds (MARPOL Annex VI reg.15) (if applicable):
(AI) 4.1.2.4.1 confirming the satisfactory installation of the vapour collection piping;
(AI) 4.1.2.4.2 confirming the satisfactory installation and operation of the means
provided to eliminate the collection of condensation in the system, such
as drains in low points of the line end;
(AI) 4.1.2.4.3 confirming the satisfactory installation and operation of the isolation
valves at the vapour manifolds;
(AI) 4.1.2.4.4 confirming that the ends of each line are properly identified as vapour
collection lines;
* Refer to the 2014 Guidelines on the approved method process (resolution MEPC.243(66)).
† Refer to the 2015 Guidelines for exhaust gas cleaning systems (resolution MEPC.259(68)).
(AI) 4.1.2.4.5 confirming that the vapour collection flanges are in accordance with the
IMO guidelines and industrial standards;
(AI) 4.1.2.5.1 confirming the satisfactory installation and operation of each incinerator;
(AI) 4.1.2.5.2 confirming that the manufacturer's name, incinerator model number/type
and capacity in heat units per hour is permanently marked on the
incinerator.
(AI) 4.1.3 For air pollution prevention the check that certificates and other relevant
documentation have been placed on board should consist of:
(AI) 4.1.3.1 the provision of (AA) 4.2.2.2 as applicable except (AA) 4.2.2.2.15.
(AI) 4.1.4 For air pollution prevention the completion of the initial survey should
consist of:
(AI) 4.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate.
(AA) 4.2.1 For air pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(AA) 4.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(AA) 4.2.1.2 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board, where
applicable;
(AA) 4.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(AA) 4.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(AA) 4.2.1.5 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Pollution
Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in
Bulk;
(AA) 4.2.1.6 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(AA) 4.2.1.7 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(AA) 4.2.1.8 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(AA) 4.2.1.10 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(AA) 4.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(AA) 4.2.1.12 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(AA) 4.2.1.13 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention; and
(AA) 4.2.1.14 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate.
(AA) 4.2.2 For air pollution prevention the annual survey should consist of the
following:
(AA) 4.2.2.1.1 confirm that no changes have been made or any new equipment
installed which would affect the validity of the certificate;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.2 confirm that there are Engine International Air Pollution Prevention
(EIAPP) Certificates for each marine diesel engine, required to be
certified, as described in chapter 2.1 of the NOX Technical Code;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.3 confirm that there is on board an approved technical file for each marine
diesel engine required to be certified;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.4 confirm that there is a record book of engine parameters for each marine
diesel engine required to be certified in the case where the engine
parameter check method is used as a means of onboard NOX verification
(NOX Technical Code para.6.2.3);
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(AA) 4.2.2.2.5 confirm that there is an approved onboard monitoring manual for each
marine diesel engine required to be certified in the case where the direct
measurement and monitoring method is to be used as a means of
onboard NOX verification (NOX Technical Code para.6.4.17.1);
(AA) 4.2.2.2.6 confirm that there is a record taking the form of a log-book as prescribed
by the Administration, for recording the tier and on/off status (or
changes) of marine diesel engines which are certified to both Tier II and
Tier III or which are certified to Tier II only at entry into and exit from an
emission control area (MARPOL Annex VI reg.13.5.3);
(AA) 4.2.2.2.7 confirm that there are written procedures covering fuel changeover,
where applicable;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.8 confirm that there is a record of fuel changeover, where applicable, and
that this record should take the form of a log-book as prescribed by the
Administration (MARPOL Annex VI reg.14.6);*
(AA) 4.2.2.2.9 confirm that there is for each exhaust gas cleaning system-SOX
(EGCS-SOx) an approved SOX Emissions Compliance Plan (SECP),
EGC system – Technical Manual (ETM-A or ETM-B), Onboard
Monitoring Manual (OMM) and EGC Record Book or Electronic Logging
System and additionally, if applicable, a SOX Emissions Compliance
Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI reg.4 and MEPC.259(68)) or approved
documentation in respect of other technological means of achieving
compliance;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.10 confirm that there is a VOC Management Plan, if required (MARPOL
Annex VI reg.15.6);
(AA) 4.2.2.2.11 confirm that there is a transfer procedure, if required, for the
VOC collection system;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.12 confirm that there is, if required, an IMO Type Approval Certificate for
each incinerator on board (MARPOL Annex VI reg.16.6.1);
(AA) 4.2.2.2.13 confirm that there is an instruction manual for each incinerator if required
(MARPOL Annex VI reg.16.7);
(AA) 4.2.2.2.14 confirm that there are records documenting training of the crew in
operating each incinerator, if required;
(AA) 4.2.2.2.15 confirm that there are the required bunker delivery notes on board and
the required fuel oil samples are kept under the ship's control (MARPOL
Annex VI reg.18) or other relevant documentation;
* When not prescribed by the Administration, this information could be contained in the engine-room log-book,
the deck log-book, the official log-book, the oil record book or a separate log-book solely for this purpose.
(AA) 4.2.2.3.4 confirm through documentary evidence that there has been no
deliberate emission of ozone-depleting substance;
(AA) 4.2.2.4 Nitrogen oxide emissions from each diesel marine diesel engine:
(AA) 4.2.2.4.1 confirm that each marine diesel engine has been operated as required
in accordance with its applicable NOX emission limit(s);
(AA) 4.2.2.4.2 confirm that no marine diesel engine has been subject to major
conversion in the intervening period;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.3.1 review engine documentation contained in the technical file and the
record book of engine parameters to check, as far as practicable, engine
rating, duty and limitation/restrictions as given in the technical file;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.3.2 confirm that the engine has not undergone any modifications or
adjustments outside the options and ranges permitted in the technical
file since the last survey;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.4.2 confirm that the test procedure is acceptable to the Administration;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.4.3 confirm that the analysers, engine performance sensors, ambient
condition measurement equipment, span check gases and other test
equipment are the correct type and have been calibrated in accordance
with the NOX Technical Code;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.4.4 confirm that the correct test cycle, as defined in the engine's technical
file, is used for these onboard confirmation test measurements;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.4.5 ensure that a fuel sample is taken during the test and submitted for
analysis;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.4.6 witness the test and confirm that a copy of the test report has been
submitted for approval on completion of the test;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.5.1 review the technical file and the onboard monitoring manual that the
arrangements are as approved;
(AA) 4.2.2.4.5.2 the procedures to be checked in the direct monitoring and measure
method and the data obtained as given in the approved onboard
monitoring manual should be followed (NOX Technical Code
para.6.4.16.1);
(AA) 4.2.2.4.6 for a marine diesel engine with an output of more than 5,000 kW and a
per cylinder displacement at or above 90 litres/cylinder installed on ships
constructed between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 1999, check
whether: *(MARPOL Annex VI reg.13.7.3)
* Refer to the 2014 Guidelines on the approved method process (resolution MEPC.243(66)).
(AA) 4.2.2.6.1 confirm that the vapour collect system, if required, is maintained in
accordance with its approved arrangement;
(AA) 4.2.2.6.2 for ships carrying crude oil, confirm the VOC management plan has been
implemented as appropriate;
(AA) 4.2.2.7.1 confirm that prohibited materials have not been incinerated;
(AA) 4.2.2.7.2 confirm that shipboard incineration of sewage sludge or sludge oil in
boilers or marine power plants is not undertaken while the ship is inside
ports, harbours or estuaries;
(AA) 4.2.2.8.3 confirm that combustion chamber outlet temperatures have been
maintained as required;
(AA) 4.2.2.8.4 confirm that each incinerator is maintained according to its approved
arrangement.
(AA) 4.2.3.1 confirm that bunker delivery notes as required conform to the
requirements of MARPOL Annex VI, Appendix V;
(AA) 4.2.3.2 confirm that MARPOL samples as required are retained on board and
labels duly completed or otherwise retained under the ship's control; and
(AA) 4.2.3.3 confirm that documentation in lieu of that required by (AA) 4.2.3.1
or 4.2.3.2 is available on board.
(AA) 4.2.4 For air pollution prevention the completion of the annual survey should
consist of:
(AA) 4.2.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the International Air Pollution
Prevention certificate; and
(AA) 4.2.4.2 if a survey shows that the condition of the ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory – see "General", section 4.8.
(AIn) 4.3.1 For air pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(AIn) 4.3.2 For air pollution prevention the intermediate survey should consist of:
(AIn) 4.3.3 For air pollution prevention the completion of the intermediate survey
should consist of:
(AIn) 4.3.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate; and
(AIn) 4.3.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of the ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory see "General", section 4.8.
(AR) 4.4.1 For air pollution prevention the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(AR) 4.4.1.1 the provisions of (AA) 4.2.1 except the validity of the International Air
Pollution Prevention Certificate.
(AR) 4.4.2 For air pollution prevention the renewal survey should consist of:
(AR) 4.4.2.2 for each incinerator the renewal survey should consist of:
(AR) 4.4.3 For air pollution prevention the completion of the renewal survey should
consist of:
(AR) 4.4.3.1 after a satisfactory survey the International Air Pollution Prevention
Certificate should be issued.
ANNEX 4
(B) 1 GUIDELINES FOR SURVEYS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT
CERTIFICATE
(BI) 1.1.1 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
examination of plans and designs should consist of:
(BI) 1.1.1.1 examining the design and construction (BWM Convention 04, regulation B-5);
(BI) 1.1.1.2 examining the ballast water management plan (BWM Convention 04, regulation
B-1);
(BI) 1.1.1.3 examining plans for the installation of ballast water management systems
(BWMS) (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3 / Note: this survey
requirement is relevant only when the performance standard according to
regulation D-2 is applicable); and
(BI) 1.1.1.4 if applicable, examining plans for the installation of prototype ballast water
treatment technologies (BWM Convention 04, regulation D-4).
(BI) 1.1.2 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
survey during construction and after installation should consist of:
(BI) 1.1.2.1 confirming that the ballast water management plan has been provided
(BWM Convention 04, regulation B-1);
(BI) 1.1.2.2 confirming that the ballast water record book has been provided
(BWM Convention 04, regulation B-2);
(BI) 1.1.2.3 verifying that, if applicable, the prototype ballast water treatment technology
installation has been carried out in accordance with the approved programme
and that the workmanship of the installation is satisfactory (BWM Convention
04, regulation D-4);
(BI) 1.1.2.4 confirming that the BWMS(s) installed on or after 28 October 2020 are approved
in accordance with the BWMS Code, as may be amended; and confirming that
the BWMS(s) installed before 28 October 2020 are approved taking into
account the guidelines* developed by the Organization or the BWMS Code, as
may be amended (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3, paragraphs 1.1 and
1.2); and
(BI) 1.1.2.5 confirming that, if applicable, a statement of compliance for a prototype ballast
water treatment technology has been provided (BWM Convention 04, regulation
D-4).
(BI) 1.1.3 When the performance standard described in regulation D-2 is applicable, the
survey after installation of BWMS (also applicable for installations on existing
ships) should consist of:
(BI) 1.1.3.1 confirming that the certificate(s) for type approval of BWMS(s) are available
(BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.2 confirming that a statement has been provided by the Administration, or from a
laboratory authorized by the Administration, confirming that the electrical and
electronic components of the BWMS(s) have been type-tested in accordance
with the specifications for environmental testing contained in part 3 of the annex
of the applicable* Guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems
(G8) (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.3 confirming that equipment manuals for major components of the BWMS(s) in
accordance with the relevant resolution* have been provided (BWM Convention
04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.4 confirming that an operations and technical manual for the BWMS(s), specific
to the ship and approved, containing a technical description of the ballast water
management system(s), operational and maintenance procedures, and backup
procedures in case of equipment malfunction*, or an operation, maintenance
and safety manual of the BWMS* has been provided (BWM Convention 04/18,
regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.5 confirming that installation specifications for the BWMS(s), e.g. installation
drawing, piping and instrumentation diagrams, etc., have been provided (BWM
Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.6 confirming that installation commissioning procedures for the BWMS(s) have
been provided (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.7 confirming that initial calibration procedures of the BWMS(s) have been
provided†( BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.8 confirming that a valid calibration certificate is provided on board in accordance
with the relevant resolution‡;
(BI) 1.1.3.9 confirming that sampling facilities are provided and so arranged in order to
collect representative samples of the ship's ballast water from the BWMS(s)
intake(s), or from a location before the ballast discharge points and any other
points necessary for sampling as applicable § (BWM Convention 04/18,
regulation D-3);
* Only applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolution MEPC.125 (53) or
MEPC.174(58).
† Only applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolution MEPC.125 (53) or
MEPC.174(58).
‡ Applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolutions MEPC.125 (53), MEPC.174(58),
MEPC.279(70) or BWMS Code.
§ Refer to resolutions MEPC.125 (53), MEPC.174(58), MEPC.279(70) or BWMS Code, where applicable.
(BI) 1.1. 3.10 verifying that the BWMS installation has been carried out in accordance with the
technical installation specification;
(BI) 1.1.3.11 verifying that the BWMS is in conformity with the Type Approval Certificate of
BWMS issued by Administration or its representative;
(BI) 1.1.3.12 verifying that the installation of the complete BWMS has been carried out in
accordance with the manufacturer's equipment specification;
(BI) 1.1.3.13 verifying that any operational inlets and outlets are located in the positions
indicated on the drawings of the pumping and piping arrangements;
(BI) 1.1.3.14 verifying that the workmanship of the installation is satisfactory and, in
particular, that any bulkhead penetrations or penetrations of the ballast system
piping are to the relevant approved standards;
(BI) 1.1.3.15 verifying in accordance with the relevant resolution * that the control and
monitoring equipment operates correctly;
(BI) 1.1.3.16 confirming that, if applicable, the ballast water management recording device(s)
are operable and that there is a sufficient supply of consumables for the
recording device(s) on board (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.17 confirming the satisfactory installation and operation of the BWMS(s), including
any audible or visual alarms (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3);
(BI) 1.1.3.18 confirming that, if applicable†, the suitable bypasses or overrides to protect the
safety of the ship and personnel are installed and used in the event of an
emergency and these shall be connected to the BWMS so that any bypass of
the BWMS shall activate an alarm. The bypass event shall be recorded by the
control and monitoring equipment and within the ballast water record book;
(BI) 1.1.3.19 verifying that, if applicable‡, installation commissioning procedures have been
completed;
(BI) 1.1.3.20 verifying that an operational test of the BWMS was carried out based on the
installation commissioning procedures and that documented evidence is
provided which shows compliance of the treated discharge ballast water with
regulation D-2 through sampling and analysis based on applicable guidelines
developed by the Organization§;
(BI) 1.1.3.21 confirming that, if applicable, active substances are provided on board (BWM
Convention 04/18, regulation D-3); and
(BI) 1.1.3.22 confirming that, if applicable, dosage instruction for active substances or
preparations are available on board (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3).
* Only applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolution MEPC.125 (53) or
MEPC.174(58).
† Only applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolution MEPC.279(70) or BWMS Code.
‡ Only applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolution MEPC.279(70) or BWMS Code.
§ Refer to BWM.2/Circ.70 on the Guidance for the commissioning testing of ballast water management
systems.
(BI) 1.1. 4 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
completion of initial survey should consist of:
(BI) 1.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, the International Ballast Water Management
Certificate should be issued.
(BA) 1.2.1 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(BA) 1.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment
Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the Cargo Ship Safety
Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety Certificate or Passenger Ship
Safety Certificate;
(BA) 1.2.1.2 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or International
Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(BA) 1.2.1.3 checking, where appropriate, the validity of the International Oil Pollution
Prevention Certificate, International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate,
and International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(BA) 1.2.1.4 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy Efficiency
Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(BA) 1.2.1.5 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the SEEMP
part II is provided and retained on board the ship (MARPOL Annex VI,
reg. 5.4.5)*;
(BA) 1.2.1.6 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the Statements of Compliance
related to fuel oil consumption reporting (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.6 and 6.7);
(BA) 1.2.1.7 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(BA) 1.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the Safety Management Certificate
(SMC) and that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(BA) 1.2.1.9 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a classification
society;
(BA) 1.2.1.10 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate of Fitness
for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the Certificate of Fitness for
the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(BA) 1.2.1.11 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate of Fitness
for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(BA) 1.2.1.12 checking when appropriate the validity of the International Pollution Prevention
Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk;
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(BA) 1.2.1.13 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(BA) 1.2.1.14 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe Manning
Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88 reg.V/13(b));
(BA) 1.2.1.15 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required by the
STCW Convention;
(BA) 1.2.1.16 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so, confirm that it
has been approved before installation and that any changes are reflected in the
certificate;
(BA) 1.2.1.17 confirming that the ballast water management plan is on board (BWM Convention
04, regulation B-1);
(BA) 1.2.1.18 checking whether the appropriate entries have been made in the ballast record
book (BWM Convention 04, regulation B-2);
(BA) 1.2.1.19 sighting the certificate(s) for type approval for the BWMS(s) (BWM Convention
04/18, regulation D-3 / Note: this survey requirement is relevant only when the
performance standard according to regulation D-2 is applicable);
(BA) 1.2.1.20 sighting the records of the recording device, if fitted (BWM Convention 04/18,
regulation D-3 / Note: this survey requirement is relevant only when the
performance standard according to regulation D-2 is applicable);
(BA) 1.2.1.21 confirming that a calibration check has been performed in accordance with the
approved manual and the relevant resolution*;
(BA) 1.2.1.22 sighting, if applicable, the statement of compliance for a prototype ballast water
treatment technology (BWM Convention 04, regulation D-4); and
(BA) 1.2.1.23 verifying, if applicable, that there is evidence that the prototype ballast water
treatment technology is continuing to be operated in accordance with the
approved programme (BWM Convention 04, regulation D-4).
(BA) 1.2.2 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments, the
annual survey should consist of:
(BA) 1.2.2.2 examining externally the ballast water treatment system and confirming, as far
as practicable its satisfactory operation (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-
3 / Note: this survey requirement is relevant only when the performance
standard according to regulation D-2 is applicable);
(BA) 1.2.2.3 confirming that, if applicable, active substances in accordance with the
manufacturer's recommendations are provided on board (BWM Convention
04/18, regulation D-3 / Note: this survey requirement is relevant only when the
performance standard according to regulation D-2 is applicable);
* Applicable to the BWMS type-approved in accordance with resolutions MEPC.125 (53), MEPC.174(58),
MEPC.279(70) or BWMS Code.
(BA) 1.2.2.4 confirming that, if applicable, dosage instructions for active substances or
preparations are available on board (BWM Convention 04/18, regulation D-3 /
Note: this survey requirement is relevant only when the performance standard
according to regulation D-2 is applicable); and
(BA) 1.2.2.5 where applicable examining externally the prototype ballast water treatment
technology and confirming, as far as practicable, its satisfactory operation
(BWM Convention 04, regulation D-4).
(BA) 1.2.3 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments, the
completion of the annual survey should consist of:
(BA) 1.2.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, the International Ballast Water Management
Certificate should be endorsed; and
(BA) 1.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is unsatisfactory,
see part "General" section 4.8.
(BIn) 1.3.1 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(BIn) 1.3.2 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
intermediate survey should consist of:
(BIn) 1.3.2.2 examining the BWMS for obvious defects, deterioration or damage including
examining associated pumps, piping and fittings for wear and corrosion (BWM
Convention 04/18, regulations D-3 and D-4 / Note: this survey requirement is
relevant only when the performance standard according to regulation D-2 is
applicable).
(BIn) 1.3.3 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
completion of the intermediate survey should consist of:
(BIn) 1.3.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, the International Ballast Water Management
Certificate should be endorsed; and
(BIn) 1.3.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is unsatisfactory,
see part "General" section 4.8.
(BR) 1.4.1 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
examination of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(BR) 1.4.1.1 the provisions of (BA) 1.2.1, except for the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate.
(BR) 1.4.2 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
renewal survey should consist of:
(BR) 1.4.3 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
completion of renewal survey should consist of:
(BR) 1.4.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, the International Ballast Water Management
Certificate should be issued.
(BAd) 1.5.1 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments, the
additional survey should consist of:
(BAd) 1.5.1.1 the provisions of (BI) 1.1.1.3, (BI) 1.1.1.4, (BI) 1.1.2.3, (BI)1.1.2.4, (BI) 1.1.2.5,
(BI)1.1.3; and
(BAd) 1.5.2 For the control and management of ships' ballast water and sediments the
completion of the additional survey should consist of:
(BAd) 1.5.2.1 after a satisfactory survey, the International Ballast Water Management
Certificate should be issued.
Annex 5
(DI) 1.1.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk the
examination of plans and designs of the structure, equipment, fittings,
arrangements and materials should consist of:
(DI) 1.1.1.1 determining the products that it is intended that the ship will be permitted
to carry and noting the corresponding minimum special requirements
(IBC Code 12 ch.17) and any other special requirements
(IBC Code 83/90/00/04 ch.15);
(DI) 1.1.1.2 examining the plans for the ship type, location of the cargo tanks, cargo
containment, materials of construction, cargo temperature control, cargo
tank vent systems, continuous monitoring of the concentration of
flammable vapours, environmental control, electrical installations, fire
protection and fire extinction, instrumentation and the provision,
specification and stowage of the equipment for personnel protection
(IBC Code 83/90/00 chs.2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14);
(DI) 1.1.1.3 examining the plans for the freeboard and stability, discharges below the
bulkhead deck and survival capability (IBC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2);
(DI) 1.1.1.4 examining the plans for the ship arrangements (IBC Code 83/90/00
ch.3);
(DI) 1.1.1.5 examining the plans for the cargo transfer (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.5);
(DI) 1.1.1.6 examining the plans for the mechanical ventilation in the cargo
area (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.12);
(DI) 1.1.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk, the survey
during construction and after installation of the structure, equipment,
fittings, arrangements and materials should consist of:
(DI) 1.1.2.1 confirming that tanks containing cargo or residues of cargo are suitably
segregated from accommodation, service and machinery spaces and
from drinking water and stores for human consumption, that cargo piping
does not pass through any accommodation, service or machinery space
other than cargo pump-rooms or pump-rooms and that cargoes are not to
be carried in either the fore or the aft peak tank (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3);
(DI) 1.1.2.2 examining the air intakes and openings into the accommodation, service
and machinery spaces in relation to the cargo piping and vent systems
and their entrances, air inlets and openings in relation to the cargo area
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3);
(DI) 1.1.2.4 examining the accesses to spaces in the cargo area (IBC Code 83/90/00
ch.3);
(DI) 1.1.2.5 examining the bilge and ballast arrangements and confirming that
pumps and pipelines are identified (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3);
(DI) 1.1.2.6 examining, when applicable, the bow or stern loading and unloading
arrangements with particular reference to the air inlets and entrances to
the accommodation, machinery and service spaces, the electrical
equipment, fire-fighting arrangements and means of communication and
testing the remote shut down for the cargo pumps (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3);
(DI) 1.1.2.7 confirming that the cargo tank types are arranged and installed in
accordance with the approved plans, internally examining the cargo
tanks, water ballast tanks and other spaces in the cargo area and
pressure testing the boundaries (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.4);
(DI) 1.1.2.8 examining the cargo transfer arrangements and confirming that any
hoses are suitable for their intended purpose and, where appropriate,
type-approved or marked with date of testing (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.5);
(DI) 1.1.2.9 examining and testing any cargo heating and cooling systems
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.7);
(DI) 1.1.2.10 confirming that the cargo tank vent systems have been installed in
accordance with the approved plans (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8);
(DI) 1.1.2.11 confirming that high-level alarms, or overflow control systems or spill
valves or other equivalent means provided to control possible liquid
rising in the venting system, are operating satisfactorily
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8);
(DI) 1.1.2.12 confirming that suitable provision is made for drainage of vent lines and
that no shut-off valves or other means of stoppage, including spectacle
or blank flanges, are fitted either to the individual vents or to the header,
if the vents are combined or either above or below pressure/vacuum
relief valves with closed vent systems (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8);
(DI) 1.1.2.13 confirming that suitable provisions are made for primary and secondary
means (or alternative measures) for controlled tank venting
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8);
(DI) 1.1.2.14 examining the location of the vent outlets in respect of the height above
the weather deck or the fore and aft gangway, from the nearest air
intakes or openings to accommodation, service and machinery spaces
and ignition sources and confirming that any high velocity vents are of
the approved type (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8);
(DI) 1.1.2.15 examining the cross-sectional area and height of the vent outlets for cargo
tank purging with inert gas, as applicable (IBC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.8);
(DI) 1.1.2.16 examining the arrangements for environmental control, including the
means of storing or generating and drying an inert gas
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.9);
(DI) 1.1.2.17 examining the electrical installations and confirming that, when appropriate,
special materials have been used and that the electrical equipment installed
in hazardous locations, as permitted, is certified by a recognized authority
for the cargoes to be carried (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.10);
(DI) 1.1.2.18 confirming that independent cargo tanks are electrically bonded to the
hull and that all gasketed cargo pipe joints and hose connections are
electrically bonded (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.10);
(DI) 1.1.2.19 examining the arrangements for the fire protection and fire extinction
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11);
(DI) 1.1.2.20 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the cargo pump-room
and confirming that the installation tests have been satisfactorily
completed and that its means of operation are clearly marked
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11);
(DI) 1.1.2.21 checking the deck foam system for the cargo area, including the supplies
of foam concentrate, and testing that the minimum number of jets of
water at the required pressure in the fire main is obtained
(see (EI) 1.1.3.1 in Annex 1), when the system is in operation
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11);
(DI) 1.1.2.22 examining the system for continuous monitoring of the concentration of
flammable vapours and confirming that the installation tests have been
satisfactorily completed (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11);
(DI) 1.1.2.23 confirming that suitable portable fire-extinguishing equipment for the cargoes
to be carried is provided in the cargo area (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11);
(DI) 1.1.2.24 examining, and confirming the satisfactory operation of, the arrangements
for the mechanical ventilation of spaces in the cargo area normally
entered during cargo handling operations (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.12) and
checking in particular that:
(DI) 1.1.2.24.2 warning notices concerning its use have been posted;
(DI) 1.1.2.24.3 it is of the extraction type, with extraction from below the floor plates,
unless the space houses electrical motors driving cargo pumps when it
should be of the positive pressure type;
(DI) 1.1.2.24.4 the ducting does not pass through accommodation, machinery
and service spaces and that the exhaust ducts are clear of
the ventilation inlets and openings to such spaces;
(DI) 1.1.2.24.5 the electric motors driving ventilation fans are positioned outside the
ventilation ducts and the ventilation fans and the ducts, in way of the
fans only, are of non-sparking construction in hazardous locations;
(DI) 1.1.2.25 examining, and confirming the satisfactory operation of, the arrangements
for the mechanical ventilation of spaces normally entered, other than
those covered by (DI) 1.1.2.24 (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.12);
(DI) 1.1.2.26 confirming that double bottoms, cofferdams, duct keels, pipe tunnels,
hold spaces and other spaces where cargo may accumulate are capable
of being efficiently ventilated to ensure a safe environment when entry
into the space is necessary and that, when appropriate, permanent
ducting is provided and any ventilation fans comply with (DI) 1.1.2.24.5
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.12);
(DI) 1.1.2.27 examining the intrinsically safe systems and circuits used for
measurement, monitoring, control and communication purposes in all
hazardous locations (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.13);
(DI) 1.1.2.28.1 suitable protective clothing is available for the crew engaged in loading
and discharging operations and that suitable storage is provided;
(DI) 1.1.2.28.2 the required safety equipment and associated breathing apparatus and
air supplies and, when appropriate, emergency-escape respiratory and
eye protection, are provided and are properly stowed;
(DI) 1.1.2.28.4 arrangements have been made for the antidotes for the cargoes actually
carried to be on board;
(DI) 1.1.2.28.6 the required gas detection instruments are on board and that
arrangements have been made for the supply of the appropriate vapour
detection tubes;
(DI) 1.1.2.30 confirming that sampling points or detector heads are located in suitable
positions in order that potentially dangerous leakages are readily
detected (IBC Code 07 ch.11.1.4, BCH Code ch.III, E 3.13).
(DI) 1.1.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk the check
that all the required documentation has been placed on board the ship
should consist of:
(DI) 1.1.3.1 confirming that a loading and stability information booklet, containing
details of typical service and ballast conditions, provisions for evaluating
other conditions of loading, a summary of the ship's survival capabilities
and sufficient information to ensure that the ship is loaded and operated
in a safe and seaworthy manner, is available on board
(IBC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2);
(DI) 1.1.3.2 confirming that damage survival capability information is supplied on the
basis of loading information for all anticipated conditions of loading and
variations in draught and trim (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.2);
(DI) 1.1.3.3 confirming that a table giving the filling ratios for the cargo tanks at
various densities has been provided (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16);
(DI) 1.1.3.4 confirming that a copy of the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk, or the equivalent
national regulations, has been provided (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16);
(DI) 1.1.3.5 confirming that information relating to the chemical and physical
properties of the products to be carried has been provided and that
provision has been made for the measures to be taken in an accident
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16);
(DI) 1.1.3.6 confirming that a manual covering procedures for cargo transfer, tank
cleaning, gas freeing, ballasting, etc. has been provided
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16);
(DI) 1.1.3.9 confirming, where applicable, the stability instrument has been approved
and is operating satisfactorily (IBC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2); and
(DI) 1.1.4 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk the
completion of the initial survey should consist of:
(DI) 1.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey issuing the International Certificate of Fitness
for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk.
(DA) 1.2.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the examination of current certificates and other
records should consist of:
(DA) 1.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.2 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(DA) 1.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.6 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(DA) 1.2.1.7 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk;
(DA) 1.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.10 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(DA) 1.2.1.11 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(DA) 1.2.1.13 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.14 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(DA) 1.2.1.15 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(DA) 1.2.1.16 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(DA) 1.2.1.17 confirming that the loading and stability information booklet, containing
details of typical service and ballast conditions, provisions for evaluating
other conditions of loading, a summary of the ship's survival capabilities
and sufficient information to ensure that the ship is loaded and operated
in a safe and seaworthy manner, is available on board
(IBC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2) ( BCH Code 85/90/00/14 para.2.2.1);
(DA) 1.2.1.18 confirming that damage survival capability information is supplied on the
basis of loading information for all anticipated conditions of loading and
variations in draught and trim (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.2)
(No BCH Code 85/90/00 reference);
(DA) 1.2.1.19 confirming that a table giving the filling ratios for the cargo tanks at
various densities has been provided (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.III, part G);
(DA) 1.2.1.20 confirming that a copy of the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the Code
for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk, or the equivalent national regulations, has been
provided (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.V);
(DA) 1.2.1.21 confirming that information relating to the chemical and physical
properties of the products to be carried has been provided, and that
provision has been made for the measures to be taken in an accident
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.V);
(DA) 1.2.1.22 confirming that a manual covering procedures for cargo transfer, tank
cleaning, gas freeing, ballasting, etc. has been provided
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.V);
(DA) 1.2.1.23 confirming that the Procedures and Arrangements Manual is on board
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.16A) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.VA);
(DA) 1.2.1.24 confirming that the shipboard marine pollution emergency plan is on
board (MARPOL 04 Annex II, reg.17);
(DA) 1.2.1.25 confirming that the Cargo Record Book is on board and being correctly
used (MARPOL 04 Annex II, reg.15);
(DA) 1.2.1.28 confirming, where applicable, the approved stability instrument is available
on board and operating satisfactorily (IBC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2); and
(DA) 1.2.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the annual survey of the structure, equipment, fittings,
arrangements and materials should consist of:
(DA) 1.2.2.1 confirming that wheelhouse doors and windows, sidescuttles and
windows in superstructure and deckhouse ends facing the cargo
area are in a satisfactory condition (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIC);
(DA) 1.2.2.2 confirming that potential sources of ignition in or near the cargo
pump-room are eliminated, such as loose gear, combustible materials,
etc., that there are no signs of undue leakage and that access ladders
are in a satisfactory condition (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIC);
(DA) 1.2.2.3 confirming that removable pipe lengths or other approved equipment
necessary for cargo separation are available in the pump-room and are
in a satisfactory condition (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIC);
(DA) 1.2.2.4 examining all pump-room bulkheads for signs of cargo leakage or
fractures and, in particular, the sealing arrangements of all penetrations
of pump-room bulkheads (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIC);
(DA) 1.2.2.5 confirming that the remote operation of the cargo pump bilge system is
satisfactory (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3) (BCH Code 85/90 ch.IIC);
(DA) 1.2.2.6 examining the bilge and ballast arrangements and confirming that
pumps and pipelines are identified (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3)
(No BCH Code 85/90/00 reference);
(DA) 1.2.2.7 confirming, when applicable, that the bow or stern loading and unloading
arrangements are in order and testing the means of communication and
the remote shut down for the cargo pumps (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.3)
(No BCH Code 85/90/00 reference);
(DA) 1.2.2.8 examining the cargo transfer arrangements and confirming that any
hoses are suitable for their intended purpose and, where appropriate,
type-approved or marked with date of testing (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.5)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IID);
(DA) 1.2.2.9 examining, when applicable, the cargo heating or cooling systems,
including any sampling arrangements, and confirming that the means for
measuring the temperature and associated alarms are operating
satisfactorily (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.7) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIF);
(DA) 1.2.2.10 examining, as far as practicable, the cargo tank vent system, including
the pressure/vacuum valves and secondary means to prevent over- or
under-pressure and devices to prevent the passage of flame, and the
arrangements of cargo tank purging with inert gas, as applicable
(IBC Code 83/90/99/00/14 ch.8,) (BCH Code 85/90/99/00 ch.IIE);
(DA) 1.2.2.11 examining the gauging devices, high-level alarms and valves associated
with overflow control (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIE);
(DA) 1.2.2.13 confirming that arrangements are made for sufficient medium to be
carried where drying agents are used on air inlets to cargo tanks
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.9) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIH);
(DA) 1.2.2.14 confirming that all electrical equipment in dangerous zones is suitable
for such locations, is in satisfactory condition and has been properly
maintained (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.10) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIB);
(DA) 1.2.2.15 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the cargo pump-room and
the deck foam system for the cargo area and confirming that their means
of operation are clearly marked (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIE);
(DA) 1.2.2.16 confirming that the condition of the portable fire-extinguishing equipment
for the cargoes to be carried in the cargo area is satisfactory
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIE);
(DA) 1.2.2.17 confirming that the system for continuous monitoring of the concentration
of flammable vapours is satisfactory (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.11);
(DA) 1.2.2.19 confirming, as far as practicable, that the intrinsically safe systems and
circuits used for measurement, monitoring, control and communication
purposes in all hazardous locations are being properly maintained
(IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.13) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIC);
(DA) 1.2.2.20 examining the equipment for personnel protection (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.14)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIF) and in particular that:
(DA) 1.2.2.20.1 the protective clothing for crew engaged in loading and discharging
operations and its stowage is in a satisfactory condition;
(DA) 1.2.2.20.2 the required safety equipment and associated breathing apparatus and
associated air supplies and, when appropriate, emergency-escape
respiratory and eye protection, are in a satisfactory condition and are
properly stowed;
(DA) 1.2.2.20.4 arrangements have been made for the antidotes for the cargoes actually
carried to be on board;
(DA) 1.2.2.20.6 the required gas detection instruments are on board and arrangements
have been made for the supply of the appropriate vapour detection
tubes;
(DA) 1.2.2.20.7 the arrangements for the stowage of cargo samples are satisfactory;
(DA) 1.2.2.22 confirming that sampling points or detector heads are located in suitable
positions in order that potentially dangerous leakages are readily
detected (IBC Code 07 ch.11.1.4) ( BCH Code ch.IIIE 3.13).
(DA) 1.2.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the completion of the annual survey should consist of:
(DA) 1.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory – see part "General" section 4.8.
(DIn) 1.3.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the examination of current certificates and other
records should consist of:
(DIn) 1.3.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the intermediate survey of the structure, equipment,
fittings, arrangements and materials should consist of:
(DIn) 1.3.2.2 examination of vent line drainage arrangements (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.8)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIE);
(DIn) 1.3.2.4 generally examining the electrical equipment and cables in dangerous
zones such as cargo pump-rooms and areas adjacent to cargo tanks to
check for defective equipment, fixtures and wiring; the insulation
resistance of the circuits should be tested and in cases where a proper
record of testing is maintained, consideration should be given to
accepting recent readings (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.10)
(BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIB);
(DIn) 1.3.2.5 confirmation that spares are provided for cargo area mechanical
ventilation fans (IBC Code 83/90/00 ch.12) (BCH Code 85/90/00 ch.IIIA);
and
(DIn) 1.3.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the completion of the intermediate survey should
consist of:
(DIn) 1.3.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory – see part "General", section 4.8.
(DR) 1.4.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the examination of current certificates and other
records should consist of:
(DR) 1.4.1.1 the provisions of (DA) 1.2.1, except the International Certificate of
Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the
Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk.
(DR) 1.4.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the
Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the renewal survey of the structure, equipment,
fittings, arrangements and materials should consist of:
(DR) 1.4.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk and the Code
for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous
Chemicals in Bulk the completion of the renewal survey should consist of:
(DR) 1.4.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Certificate of Fitness
for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk or the Certificate of
Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk.
(GI) 2.1.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the examination
of plans and designs of the structure, equipment, fittings, arrangements
and materials should consist of:
(GI) 2.1.1.1 determining the products that it is intended that the ship will be permitted
to carry and noting the corresponding minimum special requirements
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.19);
(GI) 2.1.1.2 examining the plans for the ship type, cargo containment, control of
vapour space within the cargo tanks, vapour detection, gauging,
personnel protection, filling limits for cargo tanks and other special
requirements (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 chs.2, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, and 17);
(GI) 2.1.1.3 examining the plans for the freeboard, and survival capability
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2; IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3);
(GI) 2.1.1.4 examining the plans for the ship arrangements (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.1.5 examining, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements for the segregation of the cargo
area (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3; SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-2/17);
(GI) 2.1.1.6 examining the plans for the process pressure vessels and liquid, vapour
and pressure piping systems (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 chs.5 and 6);
(GI) 2.1.1.7 examining the plans for the cargo pressure/temperature control
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.7);
(GI) 2.1.1.8 examining the plans for the cargo tank ventilation systems
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.8);
(GI) 2.1.1.9 examining the plans for the cargo containment system atmosphere
control (IGC Code 83/90/00 ch.9);
(GI) 2.1.1.11 examining the plans for fire protection and fire extinction equipment
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GI) 2.1.1.12 examining the plans for the artificial ventilation in the cargo area
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.12);
(GI) 2.1.1.13 examining the plans for the instrumentation and automation systems
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GI) 2.1.1.14 examining, when applicable, the plans for the use of cargo as fuel
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.16);
(GI) 2.1.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the survey during
construction and after installation of the structure, equipment, fittings,
arrangements and materials should consist of:
(GI) 2.1.2.1 confirming that the segregation in the cargo area and the arrangement
of the accommodation, service and machinery spaces are in accordance
with the approved plans (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.2.2 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
for the segregation of the cargo area, in accordance with the test and
inspection requirements, if any, specified in the approved documentation
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3; SOLAS 74/00/06 reg.II-2/17);
(GI) 2.1.2.3 examining the arrangements of the cargo machinery spaces and turret
compartments, including their escape routes (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.2.4 confirming that the manually operated ESD (emergency shutdown)
system together with the automatic shutdown of the cargo pumps and
compressors are satisfactory (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 chs.5 and 18);
(GI) 2.1.2.7 confirming the arrangements for the air locks (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.2.8 examining the bilge, ballast and oil fuel arrangements
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.2.9 examining, when applicable, the bow or stern loading and unloading
arrangements with particular reference to the air inlets and entrances to
the accommodation, machinery and service spaces, the electrical
equipment, fire-fighting arrangements and means of communication
between the cargo control room and the shore location
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.2.10 confirming that the cargo tanks are arranged and installed in accordance
with the approved plans, internally examining the cargo tanks, water
ballast tanks and other spaces in the cargo area, ensuring that the
appropriate non-destructive and pressure testing are carried out
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4);
(GI) 2.1.2.11 for containment systems with glued secondary barriers, confirming that a
tightness test has been carried out in accordance with the approved
procedures of the system manufacturer before and after the initial cool
down; where the designer's threshold values are exceeded, confirming that
an investigation and additional testing, such as, thermo graphic or acoustic
emission testing, has been carried out (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4);
(GI) 2.1.2.12 examining during the initial cool down, loading and discharging of the
first cargo, the overall performance of the cargo containment system and
confirming that the system is in compliance with the design parameters;
for vessels carrying liquefied natural gas, the examination includes
witnessing the satisfactory operation of the following systems, if fitted:
(GI) 2.1.2.12.2 cargo control and monitoring systems such as level gauging equipment,
temperature sensors, pressure gauges, cargo pumps, compressors, and
proper control of cargo heat exchanges, if operating;
(GI) 2.1.2.12.4 nitrogen pressure control systems for interbarrier, insulation and other
annular spaces;
(GI) 2.1.2.12.6 equipment fitted for the burning of cargo vapours, such as boilers,
multi-fuel engines or gas combustion units;
(GI) 2.1.2.12.8 on-deck cargo piping systems including expansion and supporting
arrangements;
(GI) 2.1.2.12.9 high-level alarms, by witnessing topping-off process for cargo tanks
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GI) 2.1.2.13 examining the cargo containment system for cold spots during, or
immediately following, the first loaded voyage (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4);
(GI) 2.1.2.14 examining the cargo and process piping, including the expansion
arrangements, insulation from the hull structure, pressure relief and
drainage arrangements, water curtain protection as appropriate, and
carrying out a leak detection test (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.5);
(GI) 2.1.2.15 confirming that the cargo system valving arrangements are in
accordance with the approved plans (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.5);
(GI) 2.1.2.16 confirming that any liquid and vapour hoses are suitable for their
intended purpose and, where appropriate, type-approved or marked with
date of testing (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.5);
(GI) 2.1.2.17 examining the arrangements for the cargo pressure/temperature control
including, when fitted, the thermal oxidation systems or any refrigeration
system and confirming that any associated safety measures and alarms
are satisfactory (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.7);
(GI) 2.1.2.18 confirming that the cargo tank vent systems, including the pressure relief
systems and vacuum protection systems, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plans, and that the PRVs are type-approved
or marked with date of testing (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.8);
(GI) 2.1.2.19 examining the arrangements for the cargo containment system
atmosphere control and environmental control of spaces surrounding
type C independent tanks, including the means of storing or generating
and drying an inert gas (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.9);
(GI) 2.1.2.20 examining the electrical installations with particular reference to the
certified safe type equipment fitted in gas-dangerous spaces and zones
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.10);
(GI) 2.1.2.21 examining the arrangements for the fire protection and fire extinction
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GI) 2.1.2.22 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the enclosed cargo
machinery spaces, and the enclosed cargo motor room, and confirming
that the installation tests have been satisfactorily completed and that its
means of operation is clearly marked (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GI) 2.1.2.23 examining the fire water main with particular reference to the provision
of hydrants and isolation arrangements, checking that the two jets of
water reach all areas of the cargo and containment area, at the required
pressure and testing the remote means of starting one main fire pump
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GI) 2.1.2.24 examining and testing the water spray system for cooling, fire protection
and crew protection and confirming that its means of operation is clearly
marked (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GI) 2.1.2.25 examining and testing the dry chemical powder fire-extinguishing
system for the cargo area, seeing that the fixed piping has been properly
installed and has been proved clear and confirming that its means of
operation is clearly marked (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
GI) 2.1.2.26 examining the appropriate fire-extinguishing system for: the enclosed
cargo machinery spaces for ships that are dedicated to the carriage of a
restricted number of cargoes and the internal water spray system for the
turret compartments and confirming that the installation tests have been
satisfactorily completed and that their means of operation is clearly
marked (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GI) 2.1.2.27 confirming the provision and examining the disposition of the
fire-fighters' outfits including their self-contained compressed air
breathing apparatus, and provision of two-way portable radiotelephone
apparatus of an explosion-proof type or intrinsically safe
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11) (SOLAS 74/00/12 regs.II-2/10.10;
FSS Code ch.3);
(GI) 2.1.2.28 examining, and confirming the satisfactory operation of, the
arrangements for the artificial ventilation of spaces in the cargo area
normally entered during cargo handling operations
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.12) and checking in particular that:
(GI) 2.1.2.28.2 warning notices concerning its use have been posted;
(GI) 2.1.2.28.3 it is fixed and is of the negative pressure type, permitting extraction from
either the upper or lower parts of the space or from both the upper and
lower parts when appropriate, for cargo compressor and pump-rooms
and for cargo control rooms when considered to be in hazardous areas;
(GI) 2.1.2.28.4 it is of the positive pressure type for spaces containing electric motors
driving cargo compressors or pumps and other non-hazardous spaces
within the cargo area, except those containing inert gas generators;
(GI) 2.1.2.28.5 exhaust ducts are clear of the ventilation inlets and openings to
accommodation spaces, service spaces, control stations and other
non-hazardous spaces;
(GI) 2.1.2.28.6 intakes are arranged to minimize the recycling or hazardous vapours;
(GI) 2.1.2.28.7 ducts from hazardous areas are not led through accommodation, service
and machinery spaces and control stations, except when (GI) 2.1.2.36
applies;
(GI) 2.1.2.28.8 the electric motors driving ventilation fans are positioned outside the
ventilation ducts when the carriage of flammable products is intended
and the ventilation fans and the ducts, in way of the fans only, are of
non-sparking construction in hazardous areas;
(GI) 2.1.2.29 examining, and confirming the satisfactory operation of, the arrangements
for the artificial ventilation of spaces normally entered other than those
covered by (GI) 2.1.2.28 (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.12);
(GI) 2.1.2.30 examining, and testing as appropriate, the liquid level indicators,
overflow control, pressure gauges, high pressure and, when applicable,
low pressure alarms, and temperature indicating devices for the cargo
tanks (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GI) 2.1.2.31 examining, and testing as appropriate, the permanently installed gas
detection equipment (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GI) 2.1.2.33 confirming that two sets of portable gas detection equipment suitable for
the cargoes to be carried and a suitable instrument for measuring
oxygen levels have been provided (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GI) 2.1.2.35.1 suitable protective equipment, including eye protection, is provided for
protection of crew members engaged in normal cargo operations, and
properly stowed;
(GI) 2.1.2.35.2 sufficient, but not less than three complete sets of safety equipment each
permitting personnel to enter and work in a gas-filled space are provided
and are properly stowed;
(GI) 2.1.2.35.3 an adequate supply of compressed air is provided and examining that
the spare air bottle, air compressor and charging manifold are provided
and properly stowed;
(GI) 2.1.2.35.4 a stretcher and the medical first-aid equipment, including oxygen
resuscitation equipment, when available, for the products to be carried
are provided;
(GI) 2.1.2.35.5 respiratory and eye protection suitable for emergency escape purposes
are provided and properly stowed;
(GI) 2.1.2.36 examining, when applicable, the arrangements for the use of cargo as fuel
and testing that the gas supply to the space containing gas consumers is
cut off should the double-wall concentric pipes lose the inert gas pressure
or the exhaust ventilation not be functioning correctly, and that the master
gas fuel valve may be manually closed from within the space, and at least
one remote location (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.16).
(GI) 2.1.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the check that all
the required documentation has been placed on board the ship should
consist of:
(GI) 2.1.3.1 confirming that a loading and stability information booklet, containing
details of typical service and ballast conditions, provisions for evaluating
other conditions of loading, a summary of the ship's survival capabilities
and sufficient information to ensure that the ship is loaded and operated
in a safe and seaworthy manner, is available on board
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2; IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3);
(GI) 2.1.3.2 confirming that damage survival capability information is supplied on the
basis of loading information for all anticipated conditions of loading and
variations in draught and trim (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2);
(GI) 2.1.3.3 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements for the segregation of the cargo
area is on board (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3; SOLAS 74/00/06
reg.II-2/17);
(GI) 2.1.3.4 confirming that, where applicable, the evaluation certificate * for the
adequacy of type C tank vent systems is provided
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.8);
(GI) 2.1.3.5 confirming that the approved document for the maximum allowable
loading limits together with PRVs setting pressures is on board
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.15);
(GI) 2.1.3.6 confirming that necessary information for the safe carriage of the
products to be carried has been provided (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.18);
(GI) 2.1.3.7 confirming that the approved cargo operations manuals, including
relevant procedures for ESD system and emergency isolating
operations of PRVs, has been provided (IGC Code 14 ch.18);
(GI) 2.1.3.8 confirming that a copy of the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, or the equivalent
national regulations, has been provided (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.18);
(GI) 2.1.3.9 confirming, where applicable, the stability instrument has been approved
and is operating satisfactorily (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2); and
(GI) 2.1.4 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the completion of
the initial survey should consist of:
* Refer to the Guidelines for the evaluation of the adequacy of type C tank vent systems (resolution A.829(19)).
(GI) 2.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Certificate of Fitness
for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk.
(GA) 2.2.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the examination
of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(GA) 2.2.1.1 checking the validity, as appropriate, of the Cargo Ship Safety
Equipment Certificate, the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate and the
Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety
Certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.2 checking the validity of the Safety Management Certificate (SMC) and
that a copy of the Document of Compliance (DOC) is on board;
(GA) 2.2.1.3 checking the validity of the International Ship Security Certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.4 checking the validity of the International Load Line Certificate or
International Load Line Exemption Certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.5 checking the validity of the International Oil Pollution Prevention
Certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.6 checking the certificates of class, if the ship is classed with a
classification society;
(GA) 2.2.1.7 checking the validity of the International Certificate of Fitness for the
Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk;
(GA) 2.2.1.8 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Sewage
Pollution Prevention Certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.9 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Air Pollution
Prevention Certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.10 confirming, when appropriate, the validity of the International Energy
Efficiency Certificate (MARPOL Annex VI, regs.6.4 and 6.5);
(GA) 2.2.1.11 confirming, when appropriate, that confirmation of compliance for the
SEEMP part II is provided to and retained on board the ship (MARPOL
Annex VI, reg. 5.4.5)*;
(GA) 2.2.1.13 checking, when appropriate, the validity of the International Ballast
Water Management Certificate;
* Refer to the Sample Format of Confirmation of Compliance, Early Submission of the SEEMP part II on the
ship fuel oil consumption data collection plan and its timely verification pursuant to regulation 5.4.5 of
MARPOL Annex VI (MEPC.1/Circ. 876).
(GA) 2.2.1.14 checking that the ship's complement complies with the Minimum Safe
Manning Document (SOLAS 74/00/12 reg.V/14) (SOLAS 74/88
reg.V/13(b));
(GA) 2.2.1.15 checking that the master, officers and ratings are certificated as required
by the STCW Convention;
(GA) 2.2.1.16 checking whether any new equipment has been fitted and, if so,
confirming that it has been approved before installation and that any
changes are reflected in the appropriate certificate;
(GA) 2.2.1.17 confirming that the loading and stability information booklet, containing
details of typical service and ballast conditions, provisions for evaluating
other conditions of loading, a summary of the ship's survival capabilities
and sufficient information to ensure that the ship is loaded and operated
in a safe and seaworthy manner, is available on board
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2; IS Code chs.1, 2 and 3);
(GA) 2.2.1.18 confirming that damage survival capability information is supplied on the
basis of loading information for all anticipated conditions of loading and
variations in draught and trim (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.2);
(GA) 2.2.1.19 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
alternative design and arrangements for the segregation of the cargo
area is on board (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3; SOLAS 74/00/06
reg.II-2/17);
(GA) 2.2.1.20 confirming that, where applicable, the evaluation certificate * for the
adequacy of type C tank vent systems is provided
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.8);
(GA) 2.2.1.21 checking the log-book entries to confirm whether any changes were
made in setting the pressure of PRVs or any emergency isolation action
effected in the event of a failure of a cargo tank-installed PRV, and
confirming that signs are posted in the cargo control room, if provided,
and at each PRV (IGC 83/90/00/14 ch.8);
(GA) 2.2.1.22 confirming that the approved document for the maximum allowable
loading limits together with PRVs setting pressures is on board
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.15);
(GA) 2.2.1.23 confirming that necessary information for the safe carriage of the
products to be carried has been provided (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.18);
(GA) 2.2.1.24 confirming that the approved cargo operations manuals, including
relevant procedures for ESD system and emergency isolating
operations of PRVs, has been provided (IGC Code 14 ch.18);
(GA) 2.2.1.25 confirming that a copy of the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, or the equivalent
national regulations, has been provided (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.18);
* Refer to the Guidelines for the evaluation of the adequacy of type C tank vent systems (resolution A.829(19)).
(GA) 2.2.1.26 confirming that there are records of the performance of the cargo
containment system (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4);
(GA) 2.2.1.28 confirming, where applicable, the approved stability instrument is available
on board and operating satisfactorily (IGC Code 83/90/00/14, ch.2); and
(GA) 2.2.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the annual survey
of the structure, equipment, fittings, arrangements and materials should
consist of:
(GA) 2.2.2.2 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
for the segregation of the cargo area, in accordance with the test,
inspection and maintenance requirements, if any, specified in the
approved documentation (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3; SOLAS 74/00/06
reg.II-2/17);
(GA) 2.2.2.3 confirming that the wheelhouse doors and windows, sidescuttles and
windows in superstructure and deckhouse ends in the cargo area are in
a satisfactory condition (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.4 examining the cargo machinery spaces and turret compartments,
including their escape routes (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.5 confirming that the manually operated ESD (emergency shutdown)
system together with the automatic shutdown of the cargo pumps and
compressors are satisfactory (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.5 and 18);
(GA) 2.2.2.6 examining the cargo control room (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.7 examining the gas detection arrangements for cargo control rooms and
the measures taken to exclude ignition sources where such spaces are
classified as hazardous areas (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.8 confirming the arrangements for the air locks are being properly
maintained (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.9 examining, as far as practicable, the bilge, ballast and oil fuel
arrangements (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.10 examining, when applicable, the bow or stern loading and unloading
arrangements with particular reference to the electrical equipment,
fire-fighting arrangements and means of communication between the
cargo control room and the shore location (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.11 confirming that the sealing arrangements at the gas domes are
satisfactory (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4);
(GA) 2.2.2.12 confirming that portable or fixed drip trays or deck insulation for cargo
leakage is in order (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4);
(GA) 2.2.2.13 examining the cargo and process piping, including the expansion
arrangements, insulation from the hull structure, pressure relief and
drainage arrangements and water curtain protection as appropriate
(IGC Code 83/90/00 ch.5);
(GA) 2.2.2.14 confirming that the cargo tank and interbarrier space pressure and relief
valves, including safety systems and alarms, are satisfactory
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.5);
(GA) 2.2.2.15 confirming that any liquid and vapour hoses are suitable for their
intended purpose and, where appropriate, type-approved or marked with
date of testing (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.5);
(GA) 2.2.2.16 examining the arrangements for the cargo pressure/temperature control
including, when fitted, the thermal oxidation systems and any
refrigeration system and confirming that any associated safety
measures and alarms are satisfactory (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.7);
(GA) 2.2.2.17 examining the cargo, bunker, ballast and vent piping systems, including
PRVs, vacuum relief valves, vent masts and protective screens, as far
as practicable, and confirming that the PRVs are type-approved or
marked with date of testing (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 chs.5 and 8);
(GA) 2.2.2.18 confirming that arrangements are made for sufficient inert gas to be
carried to compensate for normal losses and that means are provided
for monitoring the spaces (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.9);
(GA) 2.2.2.19 confirming that the use of inert gas has not increased beyond that
needed to compensate for normal losses by examining records of inert
gas usage (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.9);
(GA) 2.2.2.20 confirming that any air-drying system and any interbarrier and hold space
purging inert gas system are satisfactory (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.9);
(GA) 2.2.2.22 examining the arrangements for the fire protection and fire extinction and
testing the remote means of starting one main fire pump
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GA) 2.2.2.23 examining the fixed fire-fighting system for the enclosed cargo
machinery spaces, and the enclosed cargo motor room within the cargo
area, and confirming that its means of operation is clearly marked
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GA) 2.2.2.24 examining the water spray system for cooling, fire protection and crew
protection and confirming that its means of operation is clearly marked
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GA) 2.2.2.25 examining the dry chemical powder fire-extinguishing system for the
cargo area and confirming that its means of operation is clearly marked
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GA) 2.2.2.26 examining the appropriate fire-extinguishing system for the enclosed
cargo machinery spaces for ships that are dedicated to the carriage of a
restricted number of cargoes and the internal water spray system for the
turret compartments and confirming their means of operation is clearly
marked (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11);
(GA) 2.2.2.27 confirming the provision and examining the condition of the fire-fighters'
outfits including their self-contained compressed air breathing apparatus,
and provision of two-way portable radiotelephone apparatus of an
explosion-proof type or intrinsically safe (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.11)
(SOLAS 74/00/12 regs.II-2/10.10;FSS Code ch.3);
(GA) 2.2.2.29 examining, and confirming the satisfactory operation of, the arrangements
for the artificial ventilation of spaces normally entered other than those
covered by (GI) 2.1.2.27 (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.12);
(GA) 2.2.2.30 examining, and testing as appropriate and as far as practicable, the
liquid level indicators, overflow control, pressure gauges, high pressure
and, when applicable, low pressure alarms, and temperature indicating
devices for the cargo tanks (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GA) 2.2.2.31 examining, and testing as appropriate, the gas detection equipment
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GA) 2.2.2.33 confirming that two sets of portable gas detection equipment suitable for
the cargoes to be carried and a suitable instrument for measuring
oxygen levels have been provided (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13);
(GA) 2.2.2.35.1 suitable protective equipment, including eye protection, is provided for
protection of crew members engaged in normal cargo operations, and
properly stowed;
(GA) 2.2.2.35.2 sufficient, but not less than three complete sets of safety equipment each
permitting personnel to enter and work in a gas-filled space are provided
and are properly stowed;
(GA) 2.2.2.35.3 an adequate supply of compressed air is provided and examining that
the spare air bottle, air compressor and charging manifold are provided
and properly stowed;
(GA) 2.2.2.35.4 a stretcher and the medical first-aid equipment, including oxygen
resuscitation equipment, when available, for the products to be carried,
are provided;
(GA) 2.2.2.35.5 respiratory and eye protection suitable for emergency escape purposes
are provided and properly stowed; and
(GA) 2.2.2.36 examining, when applicable, the arrangements for the use of cargo as
fuel and testing, as far as practicable, that the gas supply to the space
containing gas consumers is cut off should the double wall concentric
pipes lose the inert gas pressure or the exhaust ventilation not be
functioning correctly and that master gas fuel valve may be manually
closed from within the space and at least one remote location
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.16).
(GA) 2.2.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the completion of
the annual survey should consist of:
(GA) 2.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory – see part "General" section 4.8.
(GIn) 2.3.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the examination
of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(GIn) 2.3.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the intermediate
survey of the structure, equipment, fittings, arrangements and materials
should consist of:
(GIn) 2.3.2.2 confirming, where applicable, that pipelines and independent cargo
tanks are electrically bonded to the hull (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.10);
(GIn) 2.3.2.3 generally examining the electrical equipment and cables in hazardous
areas and zones such as cargo machinery spaces and areas adjacent
to cargo tanks to check for defective equipment, fixtures and wiring; the
insulation resistance of the circuits should be tested and in cases where
a proper record of testing is maintained consideration should be given
to accepting recent readings (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.10);
(GIn) 2.3.2.4 confirming that spares are provided for cargo area mechanical
ventilation fans (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.12);
(GIn) 2.3.2.5 confirming that the heating arrangements, if any, for steel structures are
satisfactory; and
(GIn) 2.3.2.6 confirming that the high-level alarms of cargo tanks are properly worked,
by witnessing topping-off process for cargo tanks, at the first occasion
of full loading after each dry-docking (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13).
(GIn) 2.3.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the completion of
the intermediate survey should consist of:
(GIn) 2.3.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
unsatisfactory – see part "General" section 4.8.
(GR) 2.4.1 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the examination
of current certificates and other records should consist of:
(GR) 2.4.1.1 the provisions of (GA) 2.2.1, except the International Certificate of
Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk.
(GR) 2.4.2 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the renewal survey
of the structure, equipment, fittings, arrangements and materials should
consist of:
(GR) 2.4.2.2 examining the insulation and means of support of the cargo tanks and
confirming that the secondary barrier remains effective
(IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.4); and
(GR) 2.4.2.3 internal examination of selected cargo tanks (IGC Code 83/90/00/14
ch.4);
(GR) 2.4.2.4 confirming that the high-level alarms of cargo tanks are properly worked,
by witnessing topping-off process for cargo tanks, at the first occasion
of full loading after each dry-docking* (IGC Code 83/90/00/14 ch.13).
(GR) 2.4.3 For compliance with the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk the completion of
the renewal survey should consist of:
(GR) 2.4.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the International Certificate of Fitness
for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk.
(W) 3 GUIDELINES FOR THE SURVEYS FOR THE POLAR SHIP CERTIFICATE
ADDITIONAL TO SOLAS CERTIFICATES
(WI) 3.1.1 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the examination of plans and designs of the
hull, machinery and equipment should consist of:
(WI) 3.1.1.1 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, confirming that the
(Add. to PI, design service temperature of the systems and equipment required by
CI, EI, RI) this Code are consistent with the polar service temperature specified for
the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.1.4.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.2 for ships operating in low air temperature, confirming that the design
(Add. to PI, maximum service time of the survival systems and equipment are
EI, RI) consistent with the maximum expected rescue time of the vessel at polar
service temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.1.4.3);
(WI) 3.1.1.3 reviewing the operational assessment of the ship and its equipment
(Add. to PI, (Polar Code part I-A section 1.5);
CI, EI, RI)
(WI) 3.1.1.4 examining the plans and designs for materials of exposed structures and
(Add. to PI, scantlings of the ship, confirming that the materials and the scantlings
CI) are according to the polar service temperature and ice strengthening
standards, where applicable for the category of the ship (Polar Code part
I-A/paras. 3.3.1 and 3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.5 examining the stability information, including the damage stability
(Add. to PI, information, where applicable, and loading instrument as appropriate,
CI) with icing allowance in the stability calculations (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 4.3.1.1 and 4.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.6 examining whether structures and installations are designed with a view
(Add. to PI, to minimizing the accretion of ice (Polar Code part I-A/para.4.3.1.2.1);
CI)
* Refer to the Unified interpretation of paragraph 13.3.5 of the IGC Code (as amended by resolution
MSC.370(93)) (MSC.1/Circ. 1590)
(WI) 3.1.1.7 examining whether the ship is equipped with efficient means for
(Add. to PI, removing ice as required by the Administration (Polar Code
CI) part I-A/para.4.3.1.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.8 examining the means to remove or prevent ice and snow accretion around
(Add. to PI, hatches and doors; for ships intended to operate in low air temperature,
CI) examining the means for prevention of freezing or excessive viscosity of
liquids for hydraulically operated hatches and doors as mentioned in the
PWOM (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 5.3.1 and 5.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.9 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, confirming that the
(Add. to PI, watertight and weathertight doors, hatches and closing devices, not
CI) within habitable environment and requiring access while at sea, are
designed to be operable by personnel wearing heavy winter clothing
including thick mittens (Polar Code part I-A/para.5.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.10 examining the means for protecting machinery installations and
(Add. to PI, associated equipment against the effect of ice accretion and/or snow
CI) accumulation, ice ingestion from seawater, freezing and increased
viscosity of liquids, seawater intake temperature and snow ingestion, and
that seawater supplies for machinery systems are designed to prevent
ingestion of ice (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 6.3.1.1, 6.3.1.2 and 6.3.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.1.11 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, confirming that the
(Add. to PI, exposed machinery and electrical installation and appliances are fit for
CI) the polar service temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.12 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, confirming that
(Add. to PI, means are provided to ensure that combustion air for internal combustion
CI) engines driving essential machinery is maintained at a temperature in
compliance with the criteria provided by the engine manufacturer
(Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.13 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the plans
(Add. to PI, for materials of the exposed machinery and foundations, confirming that
CI) the materials are approved according to applicable standards, taking into
account the polar service temperature and the required ice strengthening
(Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.3);
(WI) 3.1.1.14 examining the plans and design of the scantlings of propeller blades,
(Add. to PI, propulsion line, steering equipment and other appendages, confirming
CI) that they are approved according to the polar service temperature if
applicable and ice strengthening standards, where applicable for the
category of the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.3);
(WI) 3.1.1.15 examining that all components of fire safety systems and appliances if
(Add. to PI, installed in exposed positions are protected from ice accretion and snow
EI) accumulation according to the operational assessment (Polar Code
part I-A/para.7.2.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.16 examining the design of fire safety systems and appliances for operation
(Add. to PI, by persons wearing bulky and cumbersome cold weather gear including
EI) gloves, where appropriate (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.1.17 examining the means to remove or prevent ice and snow accretion from
(Add. to PI, accesses of fire safety systems and appliances, escape routes, muster
EI) stations, embarkation areas, survival craft, its launching appliances and
access to survival craft according to the PWOM (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 7.2.1.4 and 8.3.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.18 confirming that the extinguishing media is suitable for the intended
(Add. to PI, operation (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.1.5);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.1.19 examining that all components of fire safety systems and appliances are
(Add. to PI, designed to ensure availability and effectiveness at the polar service
EI) temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.20 examining that the isolating and pressure/vacuum valves in exposed
(Add. to PI, locations are protected from ice accretion and remain accessible at all
EI) time (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.21 examining that all two-way portable radio communication equipment is
(Add. to PI, capable of operating at the polar service temperature (Polar Code
EI) part I-A/para.7.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.22 examining that the fire pumps including emergency fire pumps, water
(Add. to PI, mist and water spray pumps are located in compartments maintained
EI) above freezing (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 7.3.2.1 and 7.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.23 examining whether the arrangement of the fire main is such that exposed
(Add. to PI, sections can be isolated and means of draining of exposed sections are
EI) provided, and, where fixed water-based fire-extinguishing systems are
located in a space separate from the main fire pumps and use an own
sea suction, confirming that this sea suction is capable of being cleared
of ice accumulation (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 7.3.2.2 and 7.3.2.4);
(WI) 3.1.1.24 examining that the fire-fighter's outfits are stored in warm locations on
(Add. to PI, the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.2.3);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.1.25 examining that portable and semi-portable extinguishers are protected
(Add. to PI, from freezing temperatures, and confirming that locations subject to
EI) freezing are provided with extinguishers capable of operation at the polar
service temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.3.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.26 examining the plans for the materials of exposed fire safety systems,
(Add. to PI, confirming that they are approved according to the polar service
EI) temperature and ice strengthening standards (Polar Code
part I-A/para.7.3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.27 for ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017, examining that the
(Add. to PI, exposed escape routes are arranged so as not to hinder passage by
EI) persons wearing suitable polar clothing (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.28 for ships intended to operate in low air temperatures, examining the
adequacy of embarkation arrangements, with full regard to any effect of
(WI) 3.1.1.29 examining the means to ensure safe evacuation of persons, including
(Add. to PI, safe deployment of survival equipment, when operating in ice-covered
EI) waters, or directly onto the ice, as applicable (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.31 for passenger ships, examining that a proper sized immersion suit of the
(Add. to PI) insulated type or a thermal protective aid is provided for each person on
board according to the operational assessment (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.1.1 and 8.3.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.32 for cargo ships, examining that all the immersion suits provided on board
(Add. to EI) are of the insulated type (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.33 examining that for ships intended to operate in extended periods of
(Add. to PI, darkness, search lights suitable for continuous use to facilitate
EI) identification of ice are provided for each lifeboat (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.34 confirming that the lifeboats are of the partially or totally enclosed type,
(Add. to PI, as appropriate (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.1);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.1.35 examining that, when personal or group survival equipment is required
(Add. to PI, according to the operational assessment, personal and group survival
EI) equipment sufficient for 110% of the persons on board is stowed in easily
accessible locations; that containers for group survival equipment are
designed to be easily movable over the ice and floatable; and that means
of ensuring that personal and group survival equipment is accessible
following abandonment is provided (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.3.2,
8.3.3.3.3.1 to 8.3.3.3.3.4);
(WI) 3.1.1.36 examining that the survival craft and launching appliances have sufficient
(Add. to PI, capacity to accommodate the additional personal and group survival
EI) equipment if required and carried in addition to persons, and that
adequate emergency rations are provided for the maximum expected
time of rescue (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.3.3.5 and 8.3.3.3.4);
(WI) 3.1.1.37 confirming that the instructions to passengers on the use of the personal
(Add. to PI, survival equipment and the action to take in an emergency are provided
EI) on board (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.3.6);
(WI) 3.1.1.38 examining the means of receiving and displaying the information on ice
(Add. to PI, conditions in the area of operation (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.1);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.1.39 for ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 and ice strengthened,
examining that either two independent echo-sounding devices or one
(Add. to PI, echo-sounding device with two separate independent transducers are
EI) provided (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.40 confirming that clear view astern is achieved, and for ships built
(Add. to PI, before 1 July 1998 and with a length of less than 55 m, confirming that,
EI) clear-view navigation bridge front windows are provided
(SOLAS 74/00reg.V/22.1.9.4, Polar Code part I-A/ch.9.3.2.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.41 where ice accretion is likely to occur, examining the means to prevent
(Add. to PI, the accumulation of ice on antennas required for navigation and
EI) communication (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.1.42 for ice strengthened ships, examining that sensors for navigational
(Add. to PI, equipment, required either by SOLAS or the Code, projecting below the
EI) hull are protected against ice (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.4.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.43 examining the arrangements of the bridge wings for protection of
(Add. to PI, navigational equipment and operating personnel, in category A and B
EI) ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 (Polar Code
part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.4.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.44 examining the two independent non-magnetic means for heading
(Add. to PI, information, and at least one GNSS compass or equivalent for ships
EI) intended to proceed to latitudes over 80 degrees, connected to the ship's
main and emergency source of power (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 9.3.2.2.1 and 9.3.2.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.45 examining that two remotely rotatable, narrow-beam search lights
(Add. to PI, controllable from the bridge to provide lighting over an arc
EI) of 360 degrees, or other means to visually detect ice, are provided on
board if the ship is not operating solely in 24 h daylight, and examining
that a manually initiated flashing red light visible from astern to indicate
when the ship is stopped is available, for ships involved in operations
with an icebreaker escort (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 9.3.3.1
and 9.3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.46 examining that the communication equipment on board has the
(Add. to PI, capabilities for ship-to-ship and ship-to-shore communication, taking into
RI) account the limitations of communications systems in high latitudes and
the anticipated low temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.47 for ships intended to provide icebreaking escort, examining the sound
(Add. to PI, signaling system capable of being mounted to face astern (Polar Code
RI) part I-A/para.10.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.48 examining the means for two-way on-scene and SAR coordination
(Add. to PI, communications for search and rescue purposes including aeronautical
RI) frequencies operations and that communication equipment provides for
two-way voice and data communication with a Telemedical Assistance
Service (TMAS) (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 10.3.1.3 and 10.3.1.4);
(WI) 3.1.1.49 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining that each
(Add. to PI, rescue boat and lifeboat is capable of being provided with devices for
RI) transmitting signals for distress alerting, locating and on-scene
communications (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.1.50 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the
(Add. to PI, capability of all other survival craft to transmit signals for location and for
RI) communication (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.1.51 confirming that procedures are provided on board for ensuring the
(Add. to PI, availability of the mandatory communication equipment for use in
RI) survival craft, including availability of battery power for the maximum
expected time of rescue (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.3); and
(WI) 3.1.1.52 examining, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
(Add. to PI, alternative design and arrangements (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.XIV/4).
CI, EI, RI)
(WI) 3.1.2 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters, the survey during construction and after
installation of the hull, machinery and equipment should consist of:
(WI) 3.1.2.1 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, checking the
(Add. to PI, certificates or equivalent documents of the systems and equipment
CI, EI, RI) required by this Code for the consistence of the polar service
temperature specified for the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.1.4.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.2 for ships operating in low air temperature, checking the certificates or
(Add. to PI, equivalent documents of the survival systems and equipment for the
EI RI) consistence of the maximum expected rescue time at polar service
temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.1.4.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.3 examining the materials of exposed structures and the scantlings of the
(Add. to PI, ship in accordance with the polar service temperature and ice
CI) strengthening standards, where applicable for the category of the ship
(Polar Code part I-A/para.3.3.1 and 3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.4 examining whether structures and installations are designed with a view
(Add. to PI, to minimizing the accretion of ice (Polar Code part I-A/para.4.3.1.2.1);
CI
(WI) 3.1.2.5 examining the means for removing ice as required by the Administration
(Add. to PI, and mentioned in the PWOM (Polar Code part I-A/para.4.3.1.2.2);
CI)
(WI) 3.1.2.6 examining the means to remove or prevent ice and snow accretion
(Add. to PI, around hatches and doors, and testing the function of the electric heat
CI) tracing system protecting hatches and doors from freezing as applicable;
for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the
means for prevention of freezing or excessive viscosity of liquids for
hydraulically operated hatches and doors as mentioned in the PWOM
(Polar Code part I-A/paras. 5.3.1 and 5.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.7 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining that the
watertight and weathertight doors, hatches and closing devices, which
(Add. to PI, are not within a habitable environment and require access while at sea
CI) are operable by personnel wearing heavy winter clothing including thick
mittens (Polar Code part I-A/para.5.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.8 examining the means for protecting machinery installations and associated
(Add. to PI, equipment against the effect of ice accretion and/or snow accumulation, ice
CI) ingestion from seawater, freezing and increased viscosity of liquids,
seawater intake temperature and snow ingestion, and that seawater
supplies for machinery systems are designed to prevent ingestion of ice
(Polar Code part I-A/paras. 6.3.1.1, 6.3.1.2 and 6.3.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.9 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, confirming that the
(Add. to PI, exposed machinery and electrical installation and appliances are fit for
CI) the polar service temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.10 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining and
(Add. to PI, testing the means to ensure that combustion air for internal combustion
CI) engines driving essential machinery is maintained at a temperature in
compliance with the criteria provided by the engine manufacturer (Polar
Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.11 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the
(Add. to PI, certificates or equivalent documents of the materials of the exposed
CI) machinery and foundations in accordance with applicable standards,
taking into account the polar service temperature and the required ice
strengthening (Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.12 examining the scantlings of propeller blades, propulsion line, steering
(Add. to PI, equipment and other appendages in accordance with the polar service
CI) temperature if applicable and ice strengthening standards, where
applicable for the category of the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.13 examining that all components of fire safety systems and appliances if
(Add. to PI, installed in exposed positions are protected from ice accretion and snow
EI) accumulation according to the operational assessment (Polar Code part
I-A/para.7.2.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.14 examining the fire safety systems and appliances for operation by
(Add. to PI, persons wearing bulky and cumbersome cold weather gear including
EI) gloves, where appropriate (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.15 examining the means to remove or prevent ice and snow accretion from
(Add. to PI, accesses of fire safety systems and appliances, escape routes, muster
EI) stations, embarkation areas, survival craft, its launching appliances and
access to survival craft according to the PWOM (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 7.2.1.4 and 8.3.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.16 confirming that the extinguishing media is suitable for the intended
(Add. to PI, operation (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.1.5);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.2.17 examining that all components of fire safety systems and appliances are
(Add. to PI, designed to ensure availability and effectiveness at the polar service
EI) temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.18 examining that the isolating and pressure/vacuum valves in exposed
(Add. to PI, locations are protected from ice accretion and remain accessible at all
EI) times (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.19 examining that all two-way portable radio communication equipment is
(Add. to PI, capable of operating at the polar service temperature (Polar Code
EI) part I-A/para.7.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.20 examining that the fire pumps including emergency fire pumps, water
(Add. to PI, mist and water spray pumps are located in compartments maintained
EI) above freezing (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 7.3.2.1 and 7.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.21 examining whether the arrangement of the fire main is such that exposed
(Add. to PI, sections can be isolated and means of draining of exposed sections are
EI) provided, and, where fixed water-based fire-extinguishing systems are
located in a space separate from the main fire pumps and use an own
sea suction, confirming that this sea suction is capable of being cleared
of ice accumulation (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 7.3.2.2 and 7.3.2.4);
(WI) 3.1.2.22 examining that the fire-fighter's outfits are stored in warm locations on
(Add. to PI, the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.2.3);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.2.23 examining that portable and semi-portable extinguishers are protected
(Add. to PI, from freezing temperatures, and confirming that locations subject to
EI) freezing are provided with extinguishers capable of operation at the polar
service temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.3.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.24 examining the exposed fire safety systems in accordance with the polar
(Add. to PI, service temperature and ice strengthening standards (Polar Code
EI) part I-A/para.7.3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.25 for ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017, confirming the exposed
(Add. to PI, escape routes arranged as a passage by persons wearing suitable polar
EI) clothing (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.26 for ships intended to operate in low air temperatures, confirming the
(Add. to PI, embarkation arrangements, with full regard for persons wearing
EI) additional polar clothing (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.27 examining the means to ensure safe evacuation of persons, including
(Add. to PI, safe deployment of survival equipment, when operating in ice-covered
EI) waters, or directly onto the ice, as applicable (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.28 examining and testing that life-saving appliances and arrangements as
(Add. to PI, required by Polar Code , if using devices requiring a source of power, are able
EI) to operate independently of the ship's main source of power (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.29 for passenger ships, examining that a proper sized immersion suit of the
(Add. to PI) insulated type or a thermal protective aid is provided for each person on
board according to the operational assessment (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.1.1 and 8.3.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.30 for cargo ships, examining that all the immersion suits equipped on board
(Add. to EI) are of the insulated type (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.31 for ships intended to operate in extended periods of darkness, examining
(Add. to PI, and testing the search lights provided for each lifeboat suitable for
EI) continuous use to facilitate identification of ice (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.32 confirming that the lifeboats are of the partially or totally enclosed type, as
(Add. to PI, appropriate (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.1);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.2.33 confirming that, when personal or group survival equipment is required
(Add. to PI, according to the operational assessment, personal and group survival
EI) equipment sufficient for 110% of the persons on board is stowed in easily
accessible locations; that containers for group survival equipment are
designed to be easily movable over the ice and floatable; and that means
of ensuring that personal and group survival equipment is accessible
following abandonment is provided (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.3.2,
8.3.3.3.3.1 to 8.3.3.3.3.4);
(WI) 3.1.2.34 confirming that the survival craft and launching appliances have sufficient
(Add. to PI, capacity to accommodate the additional personal and group survival
EI) equipment if required and carried in addition to persons, and that
adequate emergency rations are provided for the maximum expected
time of rescue (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.3.3.5 and 8.3.3.3.4);
(WI) 3.1.2.35 confirming that the instructions to passengers on the use of the personal
(Add. to PI, survival equipment and the action to take in an emergency are provided
EI) on board (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.3.6);
(WI) 3.1.2.36 examining the means of receiving and displaying the information on ice
(Add. to PI, conditions in the area of operation (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.1);
EI)
(WI) 3.1.2.37 for ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 and ice strengthened,
(Add. to PI, confirming that either two independent echo-sounding devices or one
EI) echo-sounding device with two separate independent transducers are
provided (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.38 confirming that clear view astern is achieved, and for ships built before
(Add. to PI, 1 July 1998 and with a length of less than 55m, confirming that clear-view
EI) navigation bridge front windows are provided (SOLAS 74/00
regulation V/22.1.9.4, Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.39 where ice accretion is likely to occur, examining the means to prevent
(Add. to PI, the accumulation of ice on antennas required for navigation and
EI) communication (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.3);
(WI) 3.1.2.40 for ice strengthened ships, examining that sensors for navigational
(Add. to PI, equipment, required either by SOLAS or the Code, projecting below the
EI) hull are protected against ice (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.4.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.41 examining the arrangements of the bridge wings for protection of
(Add. to PI, navigational equipment and operating personnel, in category A and B
EI) ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 (Polar Code
part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.4.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.42 examining the two independent non-magnetic means for heading
(Add. to PI, information, and at least one GNSS compass or equivalent for ships
EI) intended to proceed to latitudes over 80 degrees, connected to the ship's
main and emergency source of power (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 9.3.2.2.1 and 9.3.2.2.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.43 examining and testing the two remotely rotatable, narrow-beam search
(Add. to PI, lights controllable from the bridge to provide lighting over an arc of 360
EI) degrees, or other means to visually detect ice, for ships not operating
solely in 24h daylight, and examining and testing the manually initiated
flashing red light visible from astern to indicate when the ship is stopped,
for ships involved in operations with an icebreaker escort (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 9.3.3.1 and 9.3.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.44 examining and testing the communication equipment on board for
(Add. to PI, ship-to-ship and ship-to-shore communication, taking into account the
RI) limitations of communications systems in high latitudes and the
anticipated low temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.1.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.45 for ships intended to provide icebreaking escort, examining the sound
(Add. to PI, signalling system capable of being mounted to face astern (Polar Code
RI) part I-A/para.10.3.1.2);
(WI) 3.1.2.46 examining and testing the means for two-way on-scene and SAR
(Add. to PI, coordination communications for search and rescue purposes including
RI) aeronautical frequencies operations and that communication equipment
provides for two-way voice and data communication with a Telemedical
Assistance Service (TMAS) (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.1.3
and 10.3.1.4);
(WI) 3.1.2.47 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining that each
(Add. to PI, rescue boat and lifeboat is capable of being provided with devices for
RI) transmitting signals for distress alerting, locating and on-scene
communications (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.1);
(WI) 3.1.2.48 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the
(Add. to PI, capability of all other survival craft to transmit signals for location and for
RI) communication (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.2); and
(WI) 3.1.2.49 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
(Add. to PI, for ship structure, machinery installations, fire safety/protection or
CI, EI, RI) life-saving appliances and arrangements, in accordance with the test and
inspection requirements, if any, specified in the approved documentation
and PWOM (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.XIV/4).
(WI) 3.1.3 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships Operating in
Polar Waters the check that all the required documentation has been placed
on board the ship should consist of:
(WI) 3.1.3.1 checking that the Polar Water Operational Manual (PWOM) with the
(Add. to PI, hazards identified in the operational assessment being addressed
CI, EI, RI) properly is placed on board (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 2.3, 4.3.1.3
and 4.3.1.4);
(WI) 3.1.3.2 confirming that the approved stability information, damage stability
(Add. to PI, information and loading instrument as appropriate, with icing allowance
CI) in the stability calculations, are on board (Polar Code part I-A/paras.
4.3.1.1 and 4.3.2);
(WI) 3.1.3.3 confirming as applicable that the crew training records or other
(Add. to PI, equivalent documents for the use of the personal survival equipment and
EI) group survival equipment are placed on board (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.3.7);
(WI) 3.1.3.4 confirming that procedures are provided on board for ensuring the
(Add. to PI, availability of the mandatory communication equipment for use in
RI) survival craft, including availability of battery power for the maximum
expected time of rescue (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.3); and
(WI) 3.1.3.5 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
(Add. to PI, alternative design and arrangement is on board, with the relevant
CI, EI, RI) contents being entered in the PWOM (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.XIV/4).
(WI) 3.1.4 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the completion of the initial survey should
consist of:
(WI) 3.1.4.1 after a satisfactory survey issuing the Polar Ship Certificate and its
associated Record of Equipment.
(WA) 3.2.1 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(WA) 3.2.1.1 confirming the provision of the operational assessment and reviewing
(Add. to any changes thereto (Polar Code part I-A/section 1.5);
CA, EA,
RP)
(WA) 3.2.1.2 confirming that the PWOM is on board, and checking whether any
(Add. to changes have been made to it since the last survey (Polar Code
CA, EA, part I-A/section 2.3 and paras. 4.3.1.3 and 4.3.1.4);
RP)
(WA) 3.2.1.4 confirming as applicable that the crew training records or other
(Add. to EA) equivalent documents for the use of the personal survival equipment and
group survival equipment are placed on board (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.3.7);
(WA) 3.2.1.5 confirming that procedures are provided on board for ensuring the
(Add. to availability of the mandatory communication equipment for use in
RP) survival craft, including availability of battery power for the maximum
expected time of rescue (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.3);
(WA) 3. 2.1.6 confirming that the voyage plan has been provided on board for the
(Add. to voyages in polar waters since the last survey; if no trading in polar waters
CA, EA, has taken place, random checking of the historical plans may be
RP) considered (Polar Code part I-A/section 11.3);
(WA) 3. 2.1.7 where applicable, checking the qualifications of the masters, chief mates,
(Add. to officers and/or other persons in charge of a navigational watch on board
CA, EA, ships operating in polar waters in accordance with chapter V of the
RP) STCW Convention and the STCW Code (Polar Code part I-A/paras.
12.3.1 and 12.3.2);
(WA) 3.2.1.8 checking the qualification certificates (if required by the Administration)
(Add. to and/or familiarization records of all the crew members for their assigned
CA, EA, duties referenced in the PWOM (Polar Code part I-A/para.12.3.4); and
RP)
(WA) 3.2.1.9 confirming that, where applicable, the approved documentation for the
(Add. to alternative design and arrangements is on board, with the relevant
CA, EA, contents being entered in PWOM (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.XIV/4).
RP)
(WA) 3.2.2 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the annual survey of the hull, machinery and
equipment should consist of:
(WA) 3.2.2.1 examining the means for removing ice as required by the Administration
(Add. to and mentioned in the PWOM (Polar Code part I-A/para.4.3.1.2.2);
CA)
(WA) 3.2.2.2 examining the means to remove or prevent ice and snow accretion
(Add. to around hatches and doors, and testing the function of the electric heat
CA) tracing system protecting hatches and doors from freezing as applicable;
for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the
means for prevention of freezing or excessive viscosity of liquids for
hydraulically operated hatches and doors as mentioned in the PWOM
(Polar Code part I-A/para.5.3.1 and 5.3.2.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.3 examining the means for protecting machinery installations and
(Add. to associated equipment against the effect of ice accretion and/or snow
CA) accumulation, ice ingestion from seawater, freezing and increased
viscosity of liquids, seawater intake temperature and snow ingestion
(Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.1.1 and 6.3.1.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.4 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining and
(Add. to testing the means to ensure that combustion air for internal combustion
CA) engines driving essential machinery is maintained at a temperature in
compliance with the criteria provided by the engine manufacturer
(Polar Code part I-A/para.6.3.2.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.5 examining that all components of fire safety systems and appliances if
(Add. to EA) installed in exposed positions are protected from ice accretion and snow
accumulation according to the operational assessment (Polar Code
part I-A/para.7.2.1.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.6 examining the fire safety systems and appliances for operation by
(Add. to EA) persons wearing bulky and cumbersome cold weather gear including
gloves, where appropriate (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.1.3);
(WA) 3.2.2.7 examining the means to remove or prevent ice and snow accretion from
(Add. to EA) accesses of fire safety systems and appliances, escape routes, muster
stations, embarkation areas, survival craft, its launching appliances and
access to survival craft according to the PWOM (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 7.2.1.4 and 8.3.1.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.8 confirming that the extinguishing media are suitable for the intended
(Add. to EA) operation (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.2.1.5);
(WA) 3.2.2.9 examining that the isolating and pressure/vacuum valves in exposed
(Add. to EA) locations are protected from ice accretion and remain accessible at all
time (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.1.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.10 examining that all two-way portable radio communication equipment is
(Add. to EA) capable of operating at the polar service temperature (Polar Code
part I-A/para.7.3.1.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.11 examining that the fire pumps including emergency fire pumps, water
(Add. to EA) mist and water spray pumps are located in compartments maintained
above freezing (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 7.3.2.1 and 7.3.2.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.12 examining whether the arrangement of the fire main is such that exposed
(Add. to EA) sections can be isolated and means of draining of exposed sections are
provided, and, where fixed water-based fire-extinguishing systems are
located in a space separate from the main fire pumps and use an own
sea suction, confirming that this sea suction is capable of being cleared
of ice accumulation (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 7.3.2.2 and 7.3.2.4);
(WA) 3.2.2.13 examining that the fire-fighter's outfits are stored in warm locations on
(Add. to EA) the ship (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.2.3);
(WA) 3.2.2.14 examining that portable and semi-portable extinguishers are protected
(Add. to EA) from freezing temperatures, and confirming that locations subject to
freezing are provided with extinguishers capable of operation at the polar
service temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.7.3.3.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.15 examining the exposed fire safety systems in accordance with the polar
(Add. to EA) service temperature and ice strengthening standards (Polar Code
part I-A/para.7.3.3.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.16 examining the means to ensure safe evacuation of persons, including
(Add. to EA) safe deployment of survival equipment, when operating in ice-covered
waters, or directly onto the ice, as applicable (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.2.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.18 for cargo ships, examining that all the immersion suits equipped on board
(Add. to EA) are of the insulated type (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.1.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.19 for ships intended to operate in extended periods of darkness, examining
(Add. to EA) and testing the search lights provided for each lifeboat, suitable for
continuous use to facilitate identification of ice (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.3.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.20 confirming that the lifeboats are of the partially or totally enclosed type,
(Add. to EA) as appropriate (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.21 confirming that, when personal or group survival equipment is required
(Add. to EA) according to the operational assessment, personal and group survival
equipment sufficient for 110% of the persons on board is stowed in easily
accessible locations; that containers for group survival equipment are
designed to be easily movable over the ice and floatable; and that means
of ensuring that personal and group survival equipment is accessible
following abandonment is provided (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.3.2,
8.3.3.3.3.1 to 8.3.3.3.3.4);
(WA) 3.2.2.22 confirming that the survival craft and launching appliances have sufficient
(Add. to EA) capacity to accommodate the additional personal and group survival
equipment if required and carried in addition to persons and that
adequate emergency rations are provided for the maximum expected
time of rescue (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 8.3.3.3.3.5 and 8.3.3.3.4);
(WA) 3.2.2.23 confirming that the instructions to passengers are provided on board
(Add. to EA) (Polar Code part I-A/para.8.3.3.3.3.6);
(WA) 3.2.2.24 examining the means of receiving and displaying information on ice
(Add. to EA) conditions in the area of operation, with a demonstration by the crew on
using the equipment and receiving the relevant information (Polar Code
part I-A/para.9.3.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.25 for ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 and ice strengthened,
(Add. to EA) confirming that either two independent echo-sounding devices or one
echo-sounding device with two separate independent transducers are
provided (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.26 confirming that clear view astern is achieved, and for ships built before 1
(Add. to EA) July 1998 and with a length of less than 55 m, confirming that clear-view
navigation bridge front windows are provided (SOLAS 74/00
regulation V/22.1.9.4, Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.27 where ice accretion is likely to occur, examining the means to prevent
(Add. to EA) the accumulation of ice on antennas required for navigation and
communication (Polar Code part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.3);
(WA) 3.2.2.28 examining the arrangements of the bridge wings for protection of
(Add. to EA) navigational equipment and operating personnel, in category A and B
ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 (Polar Code
part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.4.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.29 examining the two independent non-magnetic means for heading
(Add. to EA) information, and at least one GNSS compass or equivalent for ships
intended to proceed to latitudes over 80 degrees, connected to the ship's
main and emergency source of power (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 9.3.2.2.1 and 9.3.2.2.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.30 examining and testing the two remotely rotatable, narrow-beam search
(Add. to EA) lights controllable from the bridge to provide lighting over an arc of 360
degrees, or other means to visually detect ice, for ships not operating
solely in 24h daylight, and examining and testing the manually initiated
flashing red light visible from astern to indicate when the ship is stopped,
for ships involved in operations with an icebreaker escort (Polar Code
part I-A/paras. 9.3.3.1 and 9.3.3.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.31 examining and testing the communication equipment on board for
(Add. to ship-to-ship and ship-to-shore communication, taking into account the
RP) limitations of communications systems in high latitudes and the
anticipated low temperature (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.1.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.32 for ships intended to provide icebreaking escort, examining and testing
(Add. to the sound signaling system capable of being mounted to face astern
RP) (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.1.2);
(WA) 3.2.2.33 examining and testing the means for two-way on-scene and SAR
(Add. to coordination communications for search and rescue purposes including
RP) aeronautical frequencies operations and that communication equipment
provides for two-way voice and data communication with a Telemedical
Assistance Service (TMAS) (Polar Code part I-A/paras. 10.3.1.3 and
10.3.1.4);
(WA) 3.2.2.34 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining that each
(Add. to rescue boat and lifeboat is capable of being provided with devices for
RP) transmitting signals for distress alerting, locating and on-scene
communications (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.1);
(WA) 3.2.2.35 for ships intended to operate in low air temperature, examining the
(Add. to capability of all other survival craft to transmit signals for location and for
RP) communication (Polar Code part I-A/para.10.3.2.2); and
(WA) 3.2.2.36 examining, where applicable, the alternative design and arrangements
(Add. to CA, for ship structure, machinery installations, fire safety/protection or
EA, RP) life-saving appliances and arrangements, in accordance with the test,
inspection and maintenance requirements, if any, specified in the
approved documentation and PWOM (SOLAS 74/00/14 reg.XIV/4).
(WA) 3.2.3 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the completion of the annual survey should
consist of:
(WA) 3.2.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, endorsing the Polar Ship Certificate; and
(Add. to
CA, EA,
RP)
(WA) 3.2.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
(Add. to unsatisfactory – see part "General" section 4.8.
CA, EA,
RP)
(WIn) 3.3.1 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(WIn) 3.3.1.1 the provisions of (WA) 3.2.1 except (WA) 3.2.1.4 and (WA) 3.2.1.5.
(Add. to
CIn)
(WIn) 3.3.2 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the intermediate survey of the hull, machinery
and equipment should consist of:
(WIn) 3.3.2.1 the provisions of (WA) 3.2.2 except (WA) 3.2.2.5 to (WA) 3.2.2.36.
(Add. to
CIn)
(WIn) 3.3.3 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the completion of the intermediate survey
should consist of:
(WIn) 3.3.3.1 after a satisfactory survey endorsing the Polar Ship Certificate; and
(Add. to
CIn)
(WIn) 3.3.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
(Add. to unsatisfactory – see part "General", section 4.8.
CIn)
(WP) 3.4.1 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(WP) 3.4.1.1 the provisions of (WA) 3.2.1 except (WA) 3.2.1.3 and (WA) 3.2.1.5.
(Add. to EP)
(WP) 3.4.2 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the periodical survey of the life-saving
appliances and other equipment should consist of:
(WP) 3.4.2.1 the provisions of (WA) 3.2.2 except (WA) 3.2.2.1 to (WA) 3.2.2.4 and
(Add. to EP) (WA) 3.2.2.32 to (WA) 3.2.2.36.
(WP) 3.4.3 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the completion of the periodical survey should
consist of:
(WP) 3.4.3.1 after a satisfactory survey endorsing the Polar Ship Certificate; and
(Add. to EP)
(WP) 3.4.3.2 if a survey shows that the condition of a ship or its equipment is
(Add. to EP) unsatisfactory – see part "General", section 4.8.
(WR) 3.5.1 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the examination of current certificates and
other records should consist of:
(WR) 3.5.1.1 the provisions of (WA) 3.2.1, except the Polar Ship Certificate.
(Add. to
PR, CR,
ER, RR)
(WR) 3.5.2 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the renewal survey of the hull, machinery and
equipment should consist of:
(WR) 3.5.2.2 for passenger ships, the provisions of (WA) 3.2.2 except (WA) 3.2.2.18;
(Add. to
PR)
(WR) 3.5.2.3 for passenger ships, examining that a proper sized immersion suit of the
(Add. to insulated type or a thermal protective aid is provided for each person on
PR) board according to the operational assessment (Polar Code
part I-A/para.8.3.3.1.1 and 8.3.3.1.2); and
(WR) 3.5.2.4 for ice strengthened ships, examining that sensors for navigational
(Add. to PR, equipment, required either by SOLAS or the Code, projecting below the
ER) hull are protected against ice (SOLAS 74/00 ch.V, Polar Code
part I-A/para.9.3.2.1.4.1).
(WR) 3.5.3 For compliance with part I-A of the International Code for Ships
Operating in Polar Waters the completion of the renewal survey should
consist of:
(WR) 3.5.3.1 after a satisfactory survey, issuing the Polar Ship Certificate.
(Add. to
PR, CR,
ER, RR)
APPENDIX 1
APPENDIX 2
DIAGRAMMATIC ARRANGEMENT
Years 0 1 2 3 4 5
Months 0 9 12 15 33 36 39 57 60
21 24 27 45 48 51
PASSENGER
PASSENGER RR RR RR RR RR
SEC
SEC AA AA or
or PP PP or
or AA AA RR
RADIO
RADIO PP PP PP PP RR
SAFCON
SAFCON AA AA or
or In
In In
In or
or AA AA R*
R*
IGC/GC
IGC/GC AA AA or
or In
In In
In or
or AA AA RR
IBC/BCH
IBC/BCH AA AA or
or In
In In
In or
or AA AA RR
LOAD
LOAD LINE
LINE AA AA AA AA RR
MARPOL
MARPOL Annex
Annex II AA AA or
or In
In In
In or
or AA AA RR
MARPOL
MARPOL Annex
Annex IIII AA AA or
or In
In In
In or
or AA AA RR
MARPOL
MARPOL Annex
Annex IV
IV RR
MARPOL
MARPOL Annex
Annex VI
VI AA AA or
or In
In In
In or
or AA AA RR
BWM Convention A A or In In or A A R
R – Renewal
P – Periodical
In – Intermediate
A – Annual
___________________
* The cargo ship safety construction renewal survey may be commenced at the fourth annual survey and may
be progressed during the succeeding year with a view to completion by the fifth anniversary date. The survey
items of the fourth annual survey should not be credited to the completion of the renewal survey.
***
ANNEX 12
THE ASSEMBLY,
RECOGNIZING the need for the annexes to the Non-exhaustive list of obligations to be further
revised to take account of the amendments to the IMO instruments relevant to the III Code
which have entered into force or become effective since the adoption of resolution A.1121(30),
RECOGNIZING ALSO that parties to the relevant international conventions have, as part of
the ratification process, agreed to fully meet their responsibilities and to discharge their
obligations under the conventions and other instruments to which they are party,
REAFFIRMING that it is the primary responsibility of States to have in place an adequate and
effective system to exercise control over ships entitled to fly their flag and to ensure that they
comply with relevant international rules and regulations in respect of maritime safety, security
and protection of the marine environment,
REAFFIRMING ALSO that States, in their capacity as flag, port and coastal States, have other
obligations and responsibilities under applicable international law in respect of maritime safety,
security and protection of the marine environment,
NOTING that, while States may gain certain benefits by becoming party to instruments aimed
at promoting maritime safety, security and protection of the marine environment, these benefits
can be fully realized only when all parties carry out their obligations as required by the
instruments concerned,
NOTING ALSO that the ultimate effectiveness of any instrument depends, inter alia, upon all
States:
(a) becoming party to all instruments related to maritime safety, security and
pollution prevention and control;
(b) implementing and enforcing such instruments fully and effectively; and
2 URGES Governments of all States, in their capacity as flag, port and coastal States,
to make use of the list as much as possible in implementing IMO instruments on a national
basis;
3 REQUESTS the Maritime Safety Committee and the Marine Environment Protection
Committee to keep the list under review and to amend it as necessary;
ANNEX
(This Non-exhaustive list of obligations takes into account the amendments to the IMO
instruments relevant to the III Code which have, or are expected to have, entered into force
by or on 1 July 2020)
Table of contents
Annex 1
The following table contains a non-exhaustive list of obligations, including those obligations
imposed when a right is exercised.
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
1 When the obligation does not derive from the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, but solely from
the Protocol of 1988 relating thereto, this is indicated in the "Comments" column.
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
COLREG 1972
Article I General obligations
STCW 1978
Regs. I/9.1 and 9.2 Medical standards, procedures for the issue of medical
certificates and recognition of medical practitioners
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
Annex I
Regs. 38.4 and 38.6 Consultation with IMO for circulation of information
regarding reception facilities by Parties participating
in regional arrangements
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
Regs. 18.3 and 18.5 Consultation with IMO for circulation of information
regarding reception facilities by Parties participating
in regional arrangements
Annex IV
Annex V
Annex VI
Reg. 7 Issue or endorsement of a certificate by another Addition related to
Government IECC by
MEPC.203(62)
Regs. 9.9.3 and 9.11.2 Transfer of flag – transmitting copies of the certificate
and the relevant survey report
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
ISM Code
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
IMDG Code
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
Para. 6.2.2.1.1 Approval of cylinder service life test programme and the
results – role of competent authority
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
IMSBC Code
Casualty Investigation
Code
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
BCH Code
IGC Code
Para. 1.4.5 Issue or endorsement of certificate by another
Government
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
Sections A-I/9.5 and 9.6 Guidance, processes and procedures for conducting
medical fitness examinations and issuing medical
certificates
Annex 2
The following table contains a non-exhaustive list of obligations, including those obligations
imposed when a right is exercised.
LL 1966 and
LL PROT 19882
Existing certificates LL PROT 1988 only
(Article II-2)
2 When the obligation does not derive from the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, but solely from
the Protocol of 1988 relating thereto, this is indicated in the "Comments" column.
STCW 1978
Article VI Certificates
Reg. II-1/1.2 Compliance with earlier requirements revised SOLAS chapter II-1
adopted by MSC 80 and
MSC 82
Reg. II-2/5.2.2.5 Positioning of controls for any required see Regs. II-2/8.3.3
fire-extinguishing system in passenger and 9.5.2.3
ships
Regs. II-2/9.2.2.4.4, Fire integrity of bulkheads and decks see Reg. II-2/11.2
9.2.3.3.4 and 9.2.4.2.4
Annex I
Reg. 6 Surveys
Reg. 8 Surveys
Annex IV
Reg. 4 Surveys
Annex V
Annex VI
ISM Code
INF Code
Noise Code
3 Voyages of short duration: Voyages where the ship is not generally underway for periods long enough for
seafarers to require sleep, or long off-duty periods, during the voyages (Noise Code Para. 1.4.34).
Annex A, part A
Single-side skin bulk
carriers
Annex A, part B
Double-side skin bulk
carriers
Annex B, part A
Double hull oil
tankers
Annex B, part B
Oil tankers other
than double hull oil
tankers
BCH CODE
Casualty
Investigation Code
Para. 1.3 Qualified person(s) for investigation
Para. 6.2 Investigation into a very serious marine
casualty
IMSBC Code
Polar Code
Annex 3
The following table contains a non-exhaustive list of obligations, including those obligations
imposed when a right is exercised.
MARPOL
Annex I
Annex II
Annex 4
The following table contains a non-exhaustive list of obligations, including those obligations
imposed when a right is exercised.
Article 12 Inspection
LL 1966 AND
LL PROT 1988
STCW 1978
Article X Control
SOLAS 1974
Reg. XIV/3.2 Port State control of ships to which the chapter applies
MARPOL
Reg. 17.7 Oil Record Book, Part I – inspection without undue delay
Reg. 36.8 Oil Record Book, Part II – inspection without undue delay
Annex II
Annex III
Annex IV
Annex V
Reg. 17.3 and Ports and terminals where reception facilities are/ are not
17.4 available to manage and process the substances as
referred to in regulation 17.1 – communication to IMO
Grain Code
IMSBC Code
Section 1.3 Conditions for the carriage of cargoes not listed in the
Code
Section 1.5 Exemptions
IGC Code
Annex 5
Annex 6
Annex 7
The following tables contain non-exhaustive lists of obligations, including those obligations
imposed when a right is exercised.
Annex 1
OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTING
GOVERNMENTS/PARTIES
Chapter 6.8 Provisions for road tank vehicles and road gas In force 1/1/2020 by
elements vehicles-role of competent authority MSC.442(99)
4 The struck-out text indicates deletions and the underlined text shows additions or changes to the
non-exhaustive list of obligations.
Annex 2
SOLAS 1974
Regs. II-1/1.1.2 and 1.2 Compliance with earlier requirements revised SOLAS chapter
II-1 adopted by MSC 80
and MSC 82 and
MSC 98
In force 1/1/2020 by
MSC.421(98)
FSS Code
Ch.17, Para.3.7 and 3.8 Manufacture and test of foam fire-fighting In force 1/1/2020 by
system and its components, including deck MSC.403(96)
integrated foam nozzles
___________