Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
242 views4 pages

1.1. Load Combinations: 1.1.1. Partial Factors

The document outlines load combinations and partial factors to consider for ultimate limit states (ULS) and serviceability limit states (SLS) according to Eurocode standards. It provides tables detailing: 1) partial load factors for permanent, variable and prestressing actions; 2) adjustment factors for variable action degrees of contribution; and 3) ULS and SLS load combination expressions accounting for permanent, variable and accidental actions and their associated partial load factors. The goal is to define the load scenarios to check structural integrity and serviceability requirements under normal and extreme conditions.

Uploaded by

manolo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
242 views4 pages

1.1. Load Combinations: 1.1.1. Partial Factors

The document outlines load combinations and partial factors to consider for ultimate limit states (ULS) and serviceability limit states (SLS) according to Eurocode standards. It provides tables detailing: 1) partial load factors for permanent, variable and prestressing actions; 2) adjustment factors for variable action degrees of contribution; and 3) ULS and SLS load combination expressions accounting for permanent, variable and accidental actions and their associated partial load factors. The goal is to define the load scenarios to check structural integrity and serviceability requirements under normal and extreme conditions.

Uploaded by

manolo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1.1.

Load Combinations

The load combinations and partial load factors are based on BS EN 1990:

 ULS:

 Accidental:

 SLS-Character:

 SLS-Freq:

 SLS-Quasi:

1.1.1. Partial Factors

The partial factors are to BS EN 1990:2002+A1:2005 with additional combinations for Design
Approach 1 and Design approach 2 as dictated by BS EN 1997.
Table 1: Partial load factors

EQU STR/GEO STR/GEO


Action SLS
(Set A) DA1.1 (Set B) DA1.2 (Set C)

Permanent actions G,sup G,inf G,sup G,inf G,sup G,inf G,sup G,inf

Self-weight 1.35 0.95 1.35 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Superimposed dead load 1.20 0.95 1.20 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Self-weight of other 1.35 0.95 1.35 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
materials listed in EN 1991-
1-1-1:2008, Table A.1-A.6

Creep and Shrinkage* 0.4 0 0.4 0 0.4 0 0.4 0

Prestress 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Settlement (linear structural 1.20 0 1.20 0 1.00 0 1.00 0


analysis)
Settlement (nonlinear 1.35 0 1.35 0 1.00 0 1.00 0
structural analysis)

Variable actions (Q) Unfav. Fav. Unfav. Fav. Unfav. Fav. Unfav. Fav.

Road traffic actions (gr1a, 1.35 0 1.35 0 1.15 0 1 0


gr1b, gr2, gr5, gr6)

Pedestrian actions (gr3, gr4) 1.35 0 1.35 0 1.15 0 1 0

Wind actions 1.70 0 1.70 0 1.45 0 1 0

Train actions 1.70 0 1.70 0 1.45 0 1 0

Thermal actions 1.55 0 1.55 0 1.30 0 1 0

1.1.2. Adjustment Factor ψ

Adjustment factor of the degrees of contribution of variable actions shall be as follows (NA to BS
EN 1990 clause NA 2.3.6.3):
Table 2: Adjustment factor ψ for road bridges

Actions Load Load components ψo ψ1 ψ2


group

Traffic Loads TS 0.75 0.75 0

Gr1a UDL 0.75 0.75 0

Footway 0.40 0.40 0

Gr1b Single axle 0 0.75 0

Gr2 Horizontal forces 0 0 0

Gr3 Pedestrian loading 0 0.40 0

Gr4 Crowd loading 0 - 0

Gr5* Vertical forces from SV and SOV 0 - 0

Gr6* Horizontal forces from SV and SOV 0 0 0

Wind forces Fwk Persistent design situations 0.50 0.20 0

During execution 0.80 - 0

Fw During execution 1.0 - 0

Thermal actions Tk 0.60 0.60 0.50

Snow loads Qsn,k 0.80 - -

Construction loads Qc 1.0 - 1.0

* Frequent values of load groups 4 and 5 do not need to be considered in accordance with BS EN
1991-2:2003, clause 4.5.2.
1.1.3.Ultimate Limit States Combination (ULS)

The ultimate limit state combinations are expressed in the tables below for STR-ULS and GEO-
DA1.1 & DA1.2.
Table 3: ULS Combinations

Persistent and Permanent actions Prestress Leading Accompanying


transient variable variable
design Unfav Fav action actions
situation
G,supGk,,sup G,infGk,,inf pP Q,1Qk,,1 Q,io,iQk,,i

Permanent actions Prestres Leading Accompanying Fatigue


s variable variable action
Unfav Fav action actions

Non-cyclic Gk,,j sup Gk,,j inf P 1,1Qk,1 2,iQk,i


Cyclic Gk,,j sup Gk,,j inf P 1,1Qk,1 2,iQk,i Qfat

Permanent actions Prestress Accidental Accompanying variable


action actions

Unfav Fav Main (if any) Others


Accidental Gk,,j sup Gk,,j inf P Ad 1,1Qk,1 2,iQk,i
or
2,iQk,1
Seismic Gk,,j sup Gk,,j inf P Aεd = l A,Ek 2,iQk,i
1.1.4.Serviceability Limit States Combination (SLS)

The serviceability limit state combinations are expressed in the tables below for STR-SLS-Freq,
STR-SLS-Char.
Table 4: SLS Combinations

Combination Permanent actions Prestres Leading Accompanying


s variable variable
Unfav Fav action actions

Characteristic Gk,,j sup Gk,j ,inf P Qk,,1 o,i Qk,,i

Frequent Gk,,j sup Gk,j ,inf P 1,1Qk,1 2,jQk,j

Quasi-permanent Gk,,j sup Gk,j ,inf P 2,1Qk,1 2,jQk,j

You might also like