Journal of Network and Information Security

8 (1), June 2020, 01-06

http://www.publishingindia.com/jnis

Study the Performance of Capacity for

SISO, SIMO, MISO and MIMO in Wireless
Communication
Diponkor Bala1, G. M. Waliullah2, Mst. Ashrafunnahar Hena3, Md. Ibrahim Abdullah4 and
Mohammad Alamgir Hossain5
1,2,4,5
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh.
3
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh.
*Corresponding Author

Abstract: Due to the rapid development of the wireless Multiple Output (SIMO) and Multiple Input Single Output
communication system, it is highly required a reliable system (MISO) [3]. The MIMO system increases the reliability of
which can provide higher channel capacity and higher data MIMO channel capacity which is obtained through diversity
transmission rates for the users. These are obtained by the techniques [4] [5] and this is done by using the MIMO systems
Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) systems because multiple number of transmit and receive antennas. Due to
the MIMO systems allow the spatial diversity and spatial multiple antennas on both sides if anyone path is faded the
multiplexing technique due to its multiple antennas at both other path is worked for transmitting a signal from transmitter
transmitter and receiver side. The aim of this paper is to to receiver. The other advantage is the higher data transmission
discuss and show the capacity performance between SISO, rate that is obtained through spatial multiplexing techniques [1]
SIMO, MISO and MIMO systems. In this paper, we will [6]. MIMO wireless communication system is an IEEE 802.11n
mainly be focused on the MIMO system due to its higher standard in worldwide communication [7].
capacity and higher data transmission rates properties. For
these properties of the MIMO systems, it will be perfectly
suitable for modern communication technology.
Keywords:  Channel capacity, MIMO system,
MISO system, SIMO system, SISO system, Wireless
communication.

I. Introduction

Generally, wireless communication is a type of data

communication approach where the communication is
performed without any kind of wires, cables or any other forms
of electrical conductors. Wireless communication starting with
1G, 2G, 3G and now 4G and this development will be done in
recent decades [1]. For the rapid development of communication Fig. 1: 
Fig. 1: Basic Basic
Block Block
Diagram DiagramCommunication
of Wireless of Wireless System
systems with a large number of mobile users in the world, we Communication System
need an efficient communication system with high data transfer SISO stands for Single Input Single Output a
rates and higher channel capacity [2]. Now, we will discuss the Now, we will
capacity discuss the
performance of capacity
SISO, performance
communication ofsystem
SISO,wasSIMO,introduced on the eve
SIMO, MISO and MIMO MISO and with
systems MIMO the systems with beginning
simulation the simulation diagram.
of wireless All
communication technology. I
The Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) systemAllwillthebesimulations
diagram. the simulations
are performedare performed
by using by mostusing
less complex
MATLAB and easiest
R2016awireless communication
produced higher data transmission rate andMATLAB higher R2016a
channel software. as compared to the other systems. The SISO system h
software. one antenna at both the transmitter and receiver side.
capacity compared with the other different antenna configuration the single antenna at both sides, it is easy to u
In this paper, the theoretical information about SISO, SIMO,
In this paper, the theoretical information about SISO, SIMO,
system such as-Single Input Single Output (SISO),
MISO Single
and MIMO Input
systems as well as the simulation results are implementation and cheap also because there is no ad
MISO and MIMO systems
discussed in Section II, III, IV, V and VI respectively. And
as well as the
processing simulation
required at the results
transmitter and receiver sid
finally, the conclusion is depicted in Section VII. systems are now found in Wi-Fi, TV, radio broa
communication technology [3] [8]. A typical SISO
II. SISO SYSTEM model illustrated in Fig. 2.
 In a data transmission scheme, SISO system contains a single receiver is situated in a mobile dev
antenna at the transmitter side and multiple antennas at the the balance of processing may be
receiver side. This system is also known as receiving diversity. battery liquidate. There are two ty
The capacity of the SIMO system is better than the SISO we use in communicationsystem systems.is si
system. Although the system is relatively easy to implement,
In a data transmission scheme, SISO SIMO
system and secondly,
systemiscontains
simply Maximum
many Rat
used inreceiver
a single isap
s
the
In aprocessing is required
data transmission at theSISO
scheme, receiver endcontains
antenna
system at[9]. Thea SIMO
the transmitter side and
single Amultiple
typicalisantennas
receiver SIMO
situatedsystem
the a model
at in mobile isdev
the balanceillu
2  Journal of Network and Information Security receiver side. This system is alsoVolume 8,
as Issue 1, June 2020
antennaofatWireless
Fig. 1: Basic Block Diagram the transmitter side System
Communication and multiple antennas at the known receiving
the balance
The capacity of the SIMO system is better than the SISO
of diversity.
processingbattery
may liqui
be
we use in co
receiver side. This system is also known
are discussed in Section II, III, IV, V and VI respectively. And as receiving diversity. battery liquidate.
system. Although the system is relatively easy to implement, There are two
SIMO and typs
Theis depicted
finally, the conclusion capacityinSISO
of the SIMO
stands
Section VII. for system
Single is thebetter
Input thanOutput
Single
processing is the SISO
and
required we useend
thisreceiver
at the in [9].
communication
The SIMO systems.
A F
typical SIM
system.
cuss the capacity performance of SISO, Although the system
communication is
system relatively
was easy
introduced to
onimplement,
the eve of the SIMO and secondly, Maximum Rati
d MIMO systems with the simulationtheII.processing beginning
SISO System of wireless
is required at the communication
receiver end [9]. technology.
The SIMO It is theA typical SIMO system model is illu
simulations are performed by using most less complex and easiest wireless communication system
software. SISO stands for Single Input asSingle compared to the
Output andotherthissystems. The SISO system has only
one antenna
communication system was introduced on the eve of the at both the transmitter and receiver side. Due to
heoretical information
beginning about SISO, communication
of wireless SIMO, the single antenna at
technology. It is the most both sides, it is easy to use and
systems as well aslessthe simulation
complex and results
easiest are implementation and
wireless communication system as cheap also because there is no additional
on II, III, IV, Vcompared
and VI respectively. And Theprocessing
to the other systems. SISO system required
has onlyat one
the transmitter and receiver side. SISO
ion is depicted inantenna
Section systemsside.
VII. the transmitter and receiver
at both areDuenow
to thefound
single in Wi-Fi, TV, radio broadcasting
antenna at both sides, it is easy to communication technology
use and implementation and [3] [8]. A typical SISO system
II. SISO SYSTEM
cheap also because there is no model
additional illustrated
processing in Fig.
required 2.
at
the transmitter and receiver side. SISO systems are now found
in Wi-Fi, TV, radio broadcasting communication technology [3]
[8]. A typical SISO system model illustrated in Fig. 2. Fig. 3:  SIMO System Model
For the NR number Fig. of3: antennas
SIMO System Model
at receiver RX, theFig. 3: SIMO
capacity of System Model
For
For the NR number of antennas at receiver the N number
RX, system
R the capacityof antennas at receiver
of by [3], R X , the capacity of
the SIMO is expressed
the SIMO system is expressed by [3], MISO system
the SIMO system is expressed by [3], MISO system refers to the datamul
contains tr
contains multiple
(2) antennas at transm
the receiver
the receiver end. MISO is alsothe
During kn
Fig. 3: SIMO System Model
During the data transmission, the redundantly
Where
For the NR number of antennas at receiver RrX,isisthe
Signal totoNoise
capacity Ratio
of (SNR) at receiver antenna and required pro
Where
hm is theisgain
Signal th Noise Ratio
for mforRX antenna.
redundantly
(SNR) from
at receiver the
antenna two transmitte
requires less
the SIMO system is expressed by [3], and the gain MISO
RX antenna.
required system refers
processing to
at the
the data oftrat
transmit
capacity
Where is Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) at receiver antenna contains
IV. requires multiple
less power antennas
and [9] at[10].
transm
processing
A ty
and is the gain for RX antenna. IV.MISO
MISOStheSystem
YSTEM
receiver end.MISO
MISOsystem
is alsois kno
capacity of the low
During
[9] [10]. the
A data
typical
MISO system refers to the data transmission scheme which transmission,
MISO system the
mo
IV. MISO SYSTEM redundantly
contains multiple antennas at transmitter fromantenna
and single the two transmitte
Where
Fig. is Signal
2:  SISO System to Noise Ratio (SNR)
Model at receiver antenna required
at the receiver end. MISO is also known processing
as transmit at the transmitt
diversity.
During the data transmission, therequires
same data is transmitted
less power and processing
andSingleisOutput)
A SISO (Single Input the gain
system RXisantenna.
forcapacity given redundantly from the two transmitter antennas.
Fig. 2: SISO System Model capacity ofThis
the system
MISOissystem is low
by [8], required processing at the transmitter end so that the system
[9]at[10]. A typical end.MISO
The system mo
isIV. MISO (1)SYSTEM
C + r|h|2) bps/Hz requires less power and processing the receiver
put Single Output) SISOis(1given
system capacity Where Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) at receiver antenna
capacity of the MISO system is lower than the SIMO system
and atisreceiver
Where r is Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) the normalized complex
antenna and [9] gain
[10].of the channel.
A typical MISO system model is illustrated in Fig. 4.
h is the normalized complex gain of the channel.
 III. SIMO SYSTEM
III. SIMO System

In a data transmission scheme, SISO system contains a single

antenna at the transmitter side and multiple antennas at the Fig. 4: MISO System Model
receiver side. This system is also known as receiving diversity.
The capacity of the SIMO system is better than the SISO For the NT number of antennas at transmitter , the capacity
system. Although the system is relatively easy to implement, of the MISO system is expressed by [3],
the processing is required at the receiver end [9]. The SIMO
system is simply used in many applications, but where the MIMO syste
receiver is situated in a mobile device like a mobile handset, the contains mu
balance of processing may be narrow by size, cost and battery Fig. 4: MISO System Model end. This s
Where is Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) at the receiver end
liquidate. There are two types of SIMO systems that we use in and is the gain for the n th
antenna. diversity. T
For the
communication systems. NT number
Firstly, of antennas
Switched Diversity SIMOat andtransmitter , the capacity spectral effic
secondly, Maximum Ratio Combining SIMO [10]. A typical
of the MISO system is expressed by [3], V. MIMO
SIMO system model is illustrated in Fig. 3. Fig. 4:  MISO System Model
Fig. 4: MISO System Model
MIMO system refers to the data tr
For the NT number of antennas at transmitter , the capacity contains multiple antennas at both
ofWhere is system
Signal to
is Noise Ratio
by(SNR)
[3], at the receiver end end. This system is also known
the MISO expressed V. MIMO S
diversity. The MIMO system p
and is the gain for the n th
antenna.
spectral efficiency and higher data t
 in MIMO system processing is required at both transmitter and receive
which a be
can signal in bothas-
represented sides indiscriminately, let the antennas
receiver, it will provide channel robustness and data be omnidirectional. Name of th
throughput capacity [8] [11] [12] [13] [15]. System

SISO
SIMO
MISO
Study the Performance of Capacity for SISO, SIMO, MISO and MIMO in Wireless Communication   3
Fig. 4: MISO System Model MIMO
Each element represents the complex gains between
For the NT number of antennas at transmitter TX, the capacity of Each element hmn represents the complex gains between nth
For the N number of antennas at transmitter , the capacity transmit and receive antennas. A. Capac
the MISOTsystem is expressed by [3], transmit and mth receive antennas.
of the MISO system is expressed by [3], V. MIMO SYSTEM
ForFor
the the
number
number of N and
ofT N N in transmit T and receive R
T andR NR in transmitX TX and receiveX RX
(3) MIMO
antennas respectively,
system
antennas refers to the
respectively, capacity
thethe
data of of
the the
transmission
capacity MIMO
scheme
MIMOsystem
which is is
system
expressed
contains as [3]
multiple
expressed [8] [15][15]
antennas
as [3] [8] [16] [17]-
at[16]
both transmitter and receiver
[17]-
Where is Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) at the receiver end end. This system is also known as transmit and receive
Where r is Signal
and
to Noise Ratio (SNR) at the receiver end and diversity. The MIMO system provides higher capacity,
is the gain for the nth antenna. (6)
hn is the gain for the nth TX antenna. spectral efficiency and higher data transmission rates than any
Where det(.) denotes the determinant of a matrix, I is an NR x
V. MIMO System Where
NT identity denotes
matrix, the
r isdeterminant
the averageofreceived
a matrix,Signal
I is anto
NRNoise
x
identity
NTRatio matrix, is†the average received Signal to Noise
(SNR) and HH is the complex conjugate transpose of H.
MIMO system refers to the data transmission scheme which Ratio (SNR) and is the complex conjugate transpose of H.
contains multiple antennas at both transmitter and receiver end. VI. SModel
ystem Simulation Results and Discussion
This system is also known as transmit andFig. receive T x NR MIMO
5: Ndiversity. The SystemVI. SYSTEM SIMULATION RESULTS AND
MIMO system provides higher capacity, spectral efficiency and
For the simulation result to DISCUSSION
plot Capacity vs SNR consider
The linearhigher linkdata
model between
transmission ratesthe
thantransmit
any other and receive
data transmission Forthe
thecapacity
simulation
and SNRresult to plot
values Capacity
at y-axis vs SNR
and x-axis consider the
respectively
antennas can scheme. This systeministhe
be represented more
vectorreliable due toas-
notation its multipath in capacity and SNR values at y-axis and x-axis respectively
where the SNR value limit is -5 dB to 30 dB. The number of Fi
the transmitter to the receiver. Although in MIMO system where the SNR value limit is -5 dB to 30 dB. The number of
antennas at transmitter and receiver end are considered for the
processing is required at both transmitter and receiver, it will
antennas at transmitter
SISO, SIMO, MISO and andMIMOreceiver endsimulation
system are considered for the
which are
provide channel robustness and data throughput capacity [8]
[11] [12] [13] [15].
SISO,
shownSIMO,
in the MISO
following and MIMO
Table I: system simulation which are
other data transmission scheme. This system is more reliable Consider a MIMO system with NT transmit and NR receive
Where
nsmission y is the
scheme. due N
This toRitsx multipath
system 1 receive
is morein signal
reliable vector
the transmitter toand
the x
Consider aisMIMO
the Although
receiver. NTsystem
x 1 with shown inasthe
NT transmit
antennas following Table For
and NRinreceive
illustrated Fig-5. I: getting transmit and
ipath transmitted Consider
in the transmitter to thea MIMO
receiver. system
Although with N transmit
antennas as and N receive
illustrated in Fig-5. Table
For I: A
getting ntenna
transmitConfiguration
and for SISO, SIMO, MISO
signal
in MIMOvector, n is the N
system processing x 1T complex
is Rrequired Gaussian
at both transmitter
R and receive a signal in both sides indiscriminately, let the antennas
antennas atasboth MIMO S
em processing is required isillustrated xin N
transmitter Fig-5.
and Forreceive
getting transmit
achannel and
signal inand
bothreceive
sides indiscriminately, let the antennas
and ystem
noise vector and H
receiver, it the NRprovide
will T normalized
channel robustness matrixdata TABLE I: ANTENNA
be CONFIGURATION FOR SISO, SIMO, MISO
omnidirectional.
will provide channel signalrobustness
a throughputin capacity and
both sides data be [15]. let the antennas be
indiscriminately,
[8] [11] [12] [13] omnidirectional.
which can be represented as- AND MIMO SYSTEM
pacity [8] [11] [12]omnidirectional.
[13] [15]. Name of the Number of Number of
Name of the
System Number of ReceiverNumber
Transmitter Antenna of
System Transmitter
Antenna Receiver Antenna
SISO Antenna
1 1
SIMO SISO 1 1 2 1
SIMO 1 2
MISO 2 1
MISO 2 1
MIMO 2 2
MIMO 2 2
Each element represents the complex gains between
A. Capacity of the SISO System
transmit and receive antennas. A. Capacity of the SISO System

For the number of NT and NR in transmit TX and receive RX

antennas respectively, the capacity of the MIMO system is
expressed as [3] [8] [15] [16] [17]-
Fig. 5: NT x NR MIMO System Model
Fig. 5:  NT x NR MIMO System Model
The linear Fig.link 5: NT x N
model R MIMOthe
between System
transmitModel and receive For the simulation result to plot Capacity vs SNR consider the
The linear link
antennas can bemodel between
represented in the
the transmit and receive
vector notation as- antennas capacity and SNR values at y-axis and x-axis respectively
nk model between can the
be transmit and
represented in thereceive For theas-
vector notation simulation result to plotwhere Capacity vs SNR
the SNR valueconsider
limit is the
-5 dB to 30 dB. The number of
Where in the
e represented denotes
vector the as-
notation determinant ofcapacity
a matrix, andI is
SNRan N R x at y-axis and x-axis respectively
values
y = Hx + n (4) antennas at transmitter and receiver end are considered for the
NT identity matrix, is the average received whereSignal
the SNR tovalue
Noiselimit is -5 dB to
SISO, 30 dB.
SIMO, MISOTheand
number
MIMO of system simulation which are
Ratio (SNR) and
Where y is is
thethe
N complex
x 1 receive conjugate
signal antennas
vector transpose
at
and
Where y is the NR x 1 receive signal vector and x is the NT x
R x is of
transmitter
the N H.
T and
x 1 receiver
shown end
in are
the considered
following for
Table the
I:
1 transmitted
transmittedsignal
signalvector,
vector,n nisisthe
theSISO,
NNR xx 1SIMO,
1complexMISO
complex and MIMO system simulation which are
Gaussian
Gaussian
R
NR x 1 receive signal vector
noise vectorand x
and is
H the N
is theTNx R1x NT shown in thechannel
normalized following Table I:TABLE I: ANTENNA CONFIGURATION FOR SISO, SIMO, MISO
matrix
noise vector and H is the NR x NT normalized channel matrix
gnal vector, n is VI. NSR YSTEM
thewhich xcan S IMULATION
be represented
1 complex as-
Gaussian R ESULTS AND AND MIMO SYSTEM
which can be represented as- Name
nd H is the NR x NT normalized channel D matrix TABLE I: ANTENNA CONFIGURATION FOR of the SIMO,Number
SISO, MISO of Number of
ISCUSSION System Transmitter Receiver Antenna
epresented as- AND MIMO S YSTEM
Name of the Number of Number of Antenna
System (5) Transmitter SISOReceiver 1 1
Fig. 6:Antenna
Capacity of the SISO System
Antenna SIMO Fig. 6:  Capacity 1 2
of the SISO System
SISO 1 MISO 1 2 1
SIMO 1 MIMO 2 2 2
Each element represents the complex MISO gains between 2 1
transmit and receive antennas. MIMO 2 A. Capacity of 2the SISO System
represents the complex gains between
For the number of NT and NR in transmit TX and receive RX
receive antennas.antennas respectively, the capacity of A. the Capacity
MIMO system of theisSISO System
4  Journal of Network and Information Security Volume 8, Issue 1, June 2020
Fig. 6 shows the simulation result of the SISO system with a approximately the same for the low SNR values and when the
Fig. 6 shows
single theatsimulation
antenna result ofand
both transmitter thereceiver
SISO system i.e. onlywithone a Fig.
SNR8 isplotted the simulation
increasing resultdifference
there is a little for the comparison
between SISO betweenand
single antenna at both transmitter and receiver
communication channel between transmitter and receiver. The i.e. only one SISO,
MISO capacity performance curves. The performance of8, the
SIMO and MISO system capacity. From Fig. it
communication
channel capacitychannel
of the between
SISO system transmitter
is veryand lowreceiver.
and alsoThe the will be shown that the capacity curve
MISO system will be significantly lower than the SIMO of the MISO system is
channel capacityofofthe
implementation thesystem
SISO system
is very is very
easy andlowlow and
costalso
for the
the approximately
system. Fromthethe the comparison,
same for the low willSNR values andthat when the
Fig. 6 shows the simulation result of the SISO system with a approximately same for the lowit SNR be concluded
values and when thea data
implementation
2G wireless
single of the
communication
antenna system is veryand
system easy
[8]. and low i.e.cost
onlyfor the SNR is
transmissionincreasing
system there
can is
achievea little
a difference
better capacity between andSISO
performance
Fig. 6 shows theatsimulation
both transmitter
result of thereceiver
SISO system one
with a SNR is increasingthe
approximately there is a for
same littlethe
difference
low SNRbetweenvalues SISO
and when the
2G wireless communication
communication
single antenna atchannel system
between
both transmitter [8].
transmitter
and receiverand receiver.
i.e. onlyThe one and
for
MISO MISO
the
SNR capacity capacity
multiple performance
antenna
performance
is increasing at the
there is acurves. curves.
receiver end The
[8]
The performance
little difference performance
[9].
betweenofSISO the andof
channel capacity
communication of the between
channel SISO system is very and
transmitter low receiver.
and also theThe the
MISO MISO
MISOsystem system will be
willperformance
capacity significantly
be significantly curves. lower lower
The than than the
the SIMO
performance SIMO
of the
B. B. capacity
Capacity
implementation
Capacity
channel of Comparison
ofthe
Comparisonthesystem
SISO is
of the very
system ofeasy
SISO isthe SISO
and
and
very and
low cost
SIMO
low and SIMO
for
System
alsothethe system.
system.
MISO D.From Capacity
Fromthethe
system Comparison
comparison,
comparison,
will it will
be significantly bebetween
it will belower
concluded
concluded SISO,
that that
than SIMO,
a data
the aSIMO
data
System
2G wireless
implementationcommunication
of the systemsystemis very[8].
easy and low cost for the transmission
transmission MISOsystem
system and
cancan
MIMO achieve
achieve System
a a better
better capacity
capacity
system. From the comparison, it will be concluded that a data performance
performance
2G wireless communication system [8]. for
forthe
themultiple
multiple
transmission antenna
antenna
system at the
can receiver
atachieve
the receiver endend
a better[8]capacity
[9].
[8] [9]. performance
for the multiple antenna at the receiver end [8] [9].
B. Capacity Comparison of the SISO and SIMO D. D. Capacity
Capacity Comparison
Comparison between between
SISO,SISO,SIMO,SIMO, MISO
System Comparison of the SISO and SIMO
B. Capacity MISO and MIMO System
D. Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO,
and MIMO System
System MISO and MIMO System

Fig. 9: Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO, MISO

Fig. 7: Capacity Comparison between SISO and SIMO System and MIMO System
Fig. 7:  Capacity Comparison between SISO and
Fig. 7 depicted the simulationSIMO System result for the comparison Fig. 9: 9 shows
Capacity theComparison
simulation betweengraph forSISO, the capacity
SIMO, MISO comparison
between SISO
Capacity and SIMO
Comparison system
Fig. 7 depicted the simulation result forSISO
Fig. 7: between thecapacity.
and SIMO
comparison From
Systemthe
between between SISO, SIMO, and MIMOMISO Systemand MIMO systems. From Fig.
simulation result, it will be concluded that the capacity of the 9, Fig.
it will be shown that therebetweenis a significant difference
SISO and SIMO system capacity. From the simulation result, it
Fig. 7system
SIMO depicted
will themuch
be simulation
better resultthefor
than SISOthe system
comparison
[9].be 9: Capacity Comparison SISO, SIMO, MISOof
Fig.
will 7: concluded
be Capacity Comparison
that between
the capacity SISO
of the SIMO andsystem
SIMO System
will Fig. 9 shows
capacity
Fig. the simulation
9:  performance
Capacity of
Comparison graph
the MIMOfor the
between capacity
system
SISO, as comparison
compared
SIMO, MISOto the
between SISO and SIMO system capacity. From the and MIMO System
between
others SISO,i.e. the SIMO,
MIMO MISO and MIMO systems.
the From
best Fig.
much better than
simulation theit SISO
result, will besystem [9]. that the capacity of the
concluded and system
MIMO produced
System capacity
C. Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO and 9,performance
it will be shown among thatthethere
othersis a[12].
significant difference of it
Fig. 7 depicted the simulation
SIMO system will be much better than result
the for
SISOthe comparison
system [9]. Fig. 9 shows
capacity the
performance simulation
of the MIMO graph for For
the a MIMO
capacity system,
comparison
MISO System
between SISO and SIMO system capacity. From the Fig.
will 9beshows the simulation
expressed that the graphsystem
capacity foroftheascapacity
the compared
MIMO to the will
comparison
system
C. Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO and between
others SISO,
i.e.SISO, SIMO, MISO produced
the tremendously
MIMO and MIMO systems. From Fig.
simulation result, it Comparison
will be concluded thatSISO,
the capacity of the between
be itincreased SIMO, systemMISOduringand MIMO the the best the
systems.
increasing capacity
From Fig. 9,
values of
C. Capacity between SIMO and 9,
performancewill be
amongshown that there is a significant difference of
MISO
SIMO System
system will be much better than the SISO system [9]. itSNR.
will be Dueshown
to thatthe
the others
there
multiple [12].
is aantennas For at
significant a difference
MIMO
both system, it and
of capacity
transmitter
MISO System capacity
will performance
be expressed that of the
the capacity MIMO system
of the as compared
MIMO system to the
performance
receiveri.e.end, ofthe
the MIMO
MIMO system as compared
produced to thewill
higher others
channel
beothers the
increased tremendously MIMO system
during theproduced
increasingthe the best
valuescapacity
of
C. Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO and i.e. the
capacity.
performanceMIMO system
among produced
the others the
[12]. best capacity
For atransmitterperformance
MIMO system,
SNR. Due to the multiple antennas at both and it
MISO System among
will bethe
receiver others
expressed
end, [12].
the MIMO thatFor the acapacity
MIMO
system system, it will be
of the higher
produced MIMO expressed
system
channel will
that the capacity
be increased
capacity. of the MIMO
tremendously during the system will be
increasing the increased
values of
tremendously
SNR. Due toduring the increasing
the multiple antennas theatvalues
both of SNR. Dueand
transmitter to
the multiple
receiver end,antennas
the MIMO at bothsystem
transmitter and receiver
produced higher end, the
channel
MIMO
capacity. system produced higher channel capacity.
From Fig. 10 of Capacity comparison between SISO and various
antenna configurations of MIMO systems, it will be shown that
when increasing the number of antennas at both transmitter and
receiver end for the MIMO system the capacity of the system
will be dramatically increased. The capacity of the SISO system
is lower than any other systems. In this above figure, 3x3, 4x4,
6x6 and 8x8 antenna configurations will be considered for the
Fig. 8: Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO and MISO MIMO system. In the following Table II, the capacity of the
System 1x1 SISO, 1x2 SIMO, 2x1 MISO and 2x2 MIMO system with
Fig. 8: Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO and MISO respect to their particular SNR are given.
Fig. 8:  Capacity Comparison between SISO, SIMO and
Fig. 8 plotted the simulationSystem
result for the comparison between
SISO, SIMO and MISOMISO systemSystem
capacity. From Fig. 8, it will Fig. 10: Capacity Comparison between SISO and Various
Fig. 8 plotted the simulation result for the comparison between Antenna Configuration of MIMO System
be
Fig.shown that
8: Capacity the capacity
Comparison curve
between ofSISO,
the SIMO
MISO system is
SISO, SIMO and MISO system capacity. From Fig.and
8, itMISO
will Fig. 10: Capacity Comparison between SISO and Various
be shown that the capacity System
curve of the MISO system is Antenna Configuration of MIMO System

Fig. 8 plotted the simulation result for the comparison between

SISO, SIMO and MISO system capacity. From Fig. 8, it will Fig. 10: Capacity Comparison between SISO and Various
 9, it will be shown that there is a significant difference of
ystem [9]. capacity performance of the MIMO system as compared to the
others i.e. the MIMO system produced the best capacity
SIMO and performance among the others [12]. For a MIMO system, it
will be expressed that the capacity of the MIMO system will
be increased tremendously during the increasing the values of
SNR. Due to the multiple antennas at both transmitter and
receiver end, the MIMO system
Study produced higher
the Performance channelfor SISO, SIMO, MISO and MIMO in Wireless Communication   5
of Capacity
capacity.
Sr. SNR Capacity (bit/s/Hz)
No. dB 1x1 1x2 2x1 2x2
SISO SIMO MISO MIMO
25 19 5.5556 6.9447 5.9552 10.6614
26 20 5.8729 7.2733 6.2805 11.2825
27 21 6.1926 7.6026 6.6071 11.9099
28 22 6.5143 7.9325 6.9348 12.5429
29 23 6.8378 8.2629 7.2634 13.1808
30 24 7.1627 8.5936 7.5927 13.8228
31 25 7.4888 8.9246 7.9226 14.4683
O and MISO 32 26 7.8159 9.2558 8.2529 15.1169
33 27 8.1439 9.5873 8.5837 15.7679
34 28 8.4725 9.9189 8.9147 16.4213
son between
ig. 8, it will Fig. 10: Capacity Comparison between SISO and Various 35 29 8.8018 10.2506 9.2459 17.0764
O system is Fig. 10:  Antenna
CapacityConfiguration
Comparison between SISO
of MIMO and Various
System 36 30 9.1316 10.5824 9.5774 17.7331
Antenna Configuration of MIMO System

Table II: Capacity of the 1x1 SISO, 1x2 SIMO, 2x1 MISO VII. Conclusion
and 2x2 MIMO System
This paper has attempted to demonstrate the proper information
Sr. SNR Capacity (bit/s/Hz) of SISO, SIMO, MISO and MIMO systems as well as
No. dB 1x1 1x2 2x1 2x2 depicted the capacity performance of those systems with the
SISO SIMO MISO MIMO comparison. From the simulation results, it will be concluded
1 -5 0.3568 0.6631 0.3775 0.7186 that the capacity of the SISO system is lower than the other
system and the capacity of the SIMO system is better than the
2 -4 0.4302 0.7869 0.4572 0.8638 SISO and MISO system and the capacity of the MISO system
3 -3 0.5155 0.9271 0.5503 1.0315 stays between the SIMO and SISO system. This paper will
4 -2 0.6136 1.0839 0.6581 1.2233 also be mentioned that the MIMO system will produce higher
5 -1 0.7253 1.2575 0.7813 1.4405 capacity and higher data transmission rates as compared to the
other system due to its multiple antennas at both the transmitter
6 0 0.8514 1.4478 0.9209 1.6839
and receiver side. With increasing the number of antennas in the
7 1 0.9923 1.6540 1.0772 1.9541 MIMO system the capacity will also be increased significantly.
8 2 1.1482 1.8756 1.2502 2.2514 MIMO systems will be integrated into 3G, 4G, WLAN, LTE
9 3 1.3191 2.1116 1.4399 2.5757 etc. technology due to its tremendous performance.
10 4 1.5047 2.3607 1.6458 2.9266
11 5 1.7047 2.6218 1.8670 3.3036 References
12 6 1.9185 2.8937 2.1026 3.7058 [1] D. Tse, and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless
13 7 2.1453 3.1751 2.3515 4.1322 Communication, Cambridge University Press, USA,
14 8 2.3842 3.4647 2.6124 4.5817 2005.
15 9 2.6344 3.7615 2.8841 5.0530 [2] T. Rapaport, Wireless Communications: Principles and
16 10 2.8949 4.0644 3.1654 5.5448 Practice (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall PTR, USA, 2001.
17 11 3.1648 4.3724 3.4549 6.0557 [3] A. Paulraj, R. Nabar, and D. Gore, Introduction to Space-
Time Wireless Communications (1st ed.), Cambridge
18 12 3.4430 4.6848 3.7516 6.5843
University Press, USA, 2008.
19 13 3.7287 5.0009 4.0544 7.1291
[4] S. M. Alamouti, “A simple transmit diversity technique
20 14 4.0209 5.3199 4.3625 7.6887 for wireless communications,” In IEEE Journal on
21 15 4.3191 5.6415 4.6749 8.2617 Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 16, no. 8, pp.
22 16 4.6221 5.9651 4.9909 8.8467 1451-1458, October 1998, doi: 10.1109/49.730453.
23 17 4.9297 6.2903 5.3100 9.4425 [5] A. D. Joshi, and H. H. Joshi, “Spatial diversity techniques
24 18 5.2410 6.6169 5.6316 10.0478 for wireless communication - A comparative analysis,”
6  Journal of Network and Information Security Volume 8, Issue 1, June 2020

International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering

vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1759-1772, July 2005, doi: 10.1109/
and Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 93-97, May 2018.
TWC.2005.850307.
Availbalbe: https://www.ijltet.org/journal_details.
php?id=932&j_id=4607 [12] A. Goldsmith, S. A. Jafar, N. Jindal, and S. Vishwanath,
“Capacity limits of MIMO channels,” In IEEE Journal
[6] A. Robertcalderbank, A. Constantinioles, A. Goldsmith,
on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp.
A. Paulraj, and H. Vincent Poor, Wireless Communication
684-702, June 2003, doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2003.810294.
System, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[13] S. Taruna, and I. Kaur, “Performance analysis of MIMO
[7] F. Tramarin, S. Vitturi, M. Luvisotto, and A. Zanella,
for various antenna configurations,” 2013 International
“The IEEE 802.11n wireless LAN for real-time
Conference on Green Computing, Communication and
industrial communication,” 2015 IEEE World
Conservation of Energy (ICGCE), Chennai, 2013, pp.
Conference on Factory Communication Systems
90-93, doi: 10.1109/ICGCE.2013.6823406.
(WFCS), Palma de Mallorca, pp. 1-4, 2015, doi:
10.1109/WFCS.2015.7160568. [14] M. Tan, and J. Chen, “Comparison and analysis of MIMO
channel capacity,” 2007 International Conference on
[8] A. Khan, and R. Vesilo, “A tutorial on SISO and MIMO
Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile
channel capacities,” 2006.
Computing, pp. 299-301, Shanghai, 2007, doi: 10.1109/
[9] A. K. Sarangi, and A. Datta, “Capacity comparison of WICOM.2007.81.
SISO, SIMO, MISO & MIMO systems,” 2018 Second
[15] Y. S. Cho, J. Kim, W. Y. Yang, and C. G. Kang. MIMO-
International Conference on Computing Methodologies
OFDM Wireless Communication with MATLAB, Wiley
and Communication (ICCMC), pp. 798-801, Erode,
Publishing, 2010.
2018, doi: 10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8488147.
[16] T. K. Roy, “Capacity and performance analysis of
[10] K. Sengar, and N. Rani, “Study and capacity evaluation
Rayleigh Fading MIMO Channels using CSI at the
of SISO, MISO and MIMO RF wireless communication
transmitter side,” IJAR-CSIT, vol. 1, no. 3, July 2012.
systems,” International Journal of Engineering Trends
and Technology, vol. 9, no. 9, March 2014. [17] P. Rayi, S. Chandra Ch, “Performance evaluation of
channel capacity in MIMO system,” International
[11] A. F. Molisch, M. Z. Win, Y.-S. Choi, and J. H. Winters,
Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
“Capacity of MIMO systems with antenna selection,”
(IJERA), vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1871-1878, 2011.
In  IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,