Run MATRIX procedure:
***************** PROCESS Procedure for SPSS Version 4.2
*****************
Written by Andrew F. Hayes, Ph.D.
www.afhayes.com
Documentation available in Hayes (2022).
www.guilford.com/p/hayes3
**************************************************************
************
Model : 4
Y : SUM_BO
X : SUM_SE
M : SUM_SSS
Sample
Size: 774
**************************************************************
************
OUTCOME VARIABLE:
SUM_SSS
Model Summary
R R-sq MSE F(HC3) df1
df2 p
.1833 .0336 321.7074 20.2049 1.0000
772.0000 .0000
Model
coeff se(HC3) t p
LLCI ULCI
constant 77.1572 6.3019 12.2435 .0000
64.7863 89.5282
SUM_SE .9173 .2041
4.4950 .0000 .5167 1.3179
Standardized coefficients
coeff
SUM_SE .1833
**************************************************************
************
OUTCOME VARIABLE:
SUM_BO
Model Summary
R R-sq MSE F(HC3) df1
df2 p
.2737 .0749 31851.2461 27.1383 2.0000
771.0000 .0000
Model
coeff se(HC3) t p
LLCI ULCI
constant 1347.9078 64.1242 21.0203 .0000
1222.0291 1473.7866
SUM_SE -12.5591 1.8452 -6.8064 .0000 -
16.1813 -8.9369
SUM_SSS -.8250 .3385 -2.4372 .0150 -
1.4895 -.1605
Standardized coefficients
coeff
SUM_SE -.2469
SUM_SSS -.0812
************************** TOTAL EFFECT MODEL
****************************
OUTCOME VARIABLE:
SUM_BO
Model Summary
R R-sq MSE F(HC3) df1
df2 p
.2618 .0685 32028.9551 50.8100 1.0000
772.0000 .0000
Model
coeff se(HC3) t p
LLCI ULCI
constant 1284.2524 56.2514 22.8306 .0000
1173.8286 1394.6761
SUM_SE -13.3158 1.8681 -7.1281 .0000 -
16.9829 -9.6487
Standardized coefficients
coeff
SUM_SE -.2618
************** TOTAL, DIRECT, AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF X ON Y
**************
Total effect of X on Y
Effect se(HC3) t p LLCI
ULCI c_cs
-13.3158 1.8681 -7.1281 .0000 -16.9829 -
9.6487 -.2618
Direct effect of X on Y
Effect se(HC3) t p LLCI
ULCI c'_cs
-12.5591 1.8452 -6.8064 .0000 -16.1813 -
8.9369 -.2469
Indirect effect(s) of X on Y:
Effect BootSE BootLLCI BootULCI
SUM_SSS -.7568 .3508 -1.5086 -.1284
Completely standardized indirect effect(s) of X on Y:
Effect BootSE BootLLCI BootULCI
SUM_SSS -.0149 .0069 -.0298 -.0026
**************************************************************
************
Bootstrap estimates were saved to a file
Map of column names to model coefficients:
Conseqnt Antecdnt
COL1 SUM_SSS constant
COL2 SUM_SSS SUM_SE
COL3 SUM_BO constant
COL4 SUM_BO SUM_SE
COL5 SUM_BO SUM_SSS
*********** BOOTSTRAP RESULTS FOR REGRESSION MODEL PARAMETERS
************
OUTCOME VARIABLE:
SUM_SSS
Coeff BootMean BootSE BootLLCI
BootULCI
constant 77.1572 77.1060 6.2848 64.9124
89.4740
SUM_SE .9173 .9190 .2032 .5187
1.3165
----------
OUTCOME VARIABLE:
SUM_BO
Coeff BootMean BootSE BootLLCI
BootULCI
constant 1347.9078 1347.2765 63.9345 1215.8717
1468.8615
SUM_SE -12.5591 -12.5403 1.8585 -16.1212 -
8.8138
SUM_SSS -.8250 -.8251 .3281 -1.4562
-.1616
*********************** ANALYSIS NOTES AND ERRORS
************************
Level of confidence for all confidence intervals in output:
95.0000
Number of bootstrap samples for percentile bootstrap
confidence intervals:
5000
NOTE: A heteroscedasticity consistent standard error and
covariance matrix estimator was used.
------ END MATRIX -----
Figure 2
Mediation Path Analysis – The Mediating Role of Spousal Support on the Relationship
Between Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teacher Burnout.
Self-Efficacy (IV) C Teacher Burnout (DV)
Spousal Support (M)
a b
Self-Efficacy (IV) c′ Teacher Burnout (DV)
A mediation analysis using PROCESSv4.3.1 for SPSSv29 (Hayes, 2023) was
conducted with all three requirements for a mediation met (see Figure 3 and Table 5) (Baron
& Kenny, 1986). First, the total effect of teacher ‘self-efficacy’ (IV) and ‘burnout’ (DV)
(Path C) was analysed identifying significant direct relationship p< .001. Second, a
statistically significant relationship between ‘Self-efficacy’ (IV) and the mediator ‘Spousal
support’ p< .001 (Path A) was found. Third, the analysis identified a statistically significant
relationship between the mediator ‘Spousal support’ and ‘burnout’ (DV) p< .05 (Path B).
Finally, to test the indirect association of the mediator, bootstrapped 95% CI of the indirect
effect was calculated. Analysis of the output identified a significant relationship (p<.001)
between the mediator ‘Spousal support’ and both the variables of ‘Self-efficacy and ‘Bunout’
(Path C’) with confidence intervals not containing zero (95% CI [-1.5, -.13). Analysis of the
direct effects (95% CI [-16.18 -8.94) suggests a partial mediation between the variable
Spousal support and the relationship between teacher self-efficacy and burnout.
