Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views3 pages

NEP Revision Notes

The NEP was introduced in 1921 as a replacement for the failed policy of War Communism. It allowed for a limited free market and private enterprise to help revive Russia's devastated economy after World War I and the Russian Civil War. The NEP succeeded in stabilizing Russia's economy and increasing agricultural and industrial production in its first few years. However, it also led to economic imbalances and dissatisfaction from some Bolsheviks who disliked the growing class of wealthy businessmen. While an improvement over previous policies, the NEP did not fully solve Russia's economic problems in the long run.

Uploaded by

Tüge Sabancı
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views3 pages

NEP Revision Notes

The NEP was introduced in 1921 as a replacement for the failed policy of War Communism. It allowed for a limited free market and private enterprise to help revive Russia's devastated economy after World War I and the Russian Civil War. The NEP succeeded in stabilizing Russia's economy and increasing agricultural and industrial production in its first few years. However, it also led to economic imbalances and dissatisfaction from some Bolsheviks who disliked the growing class of wealthy businessmen. While an improvement over previous policies, the NEP did not fully solve Russia's economic problems in the long run.

Uploaded by

Tüge Sabancı
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

NEP – New Economic Policy Revision Notes

What was it and why was it introduced?


• The NEP was introduced in 1921 to replace the failed War Communism – too little too late!!!
• By 1921 almost 25 million people were facing starvation – a conservative estimate is almost 5
million deaths!
• The NEP was almost a capitalist approach.
• Wages were paid in cash not kind and surplus staff were dismissed.
• Despite being a little late to prevent famine the NEP did prove to be a success economically and
politically for Lenin.

Did it Work?
• It brought some form of economic sense back to Russia’s economy.
• It eased peasant discontent – by Lenin’s death in 1924 the economy was vastly improving.
• Trade operated on an economic and commercial accounting basis.
• Industry was divided into ‘trusts’, which controlled various ‘enterprises’.
• In the first stages of NEP, restrictions were placed on a firm’s freedom to buy and sell but by
1922, these limits were dropped and profit-making became the main aim of those in industry.
• No industry was obligated to supply the state and, as Lenin had commented, the Communists
had to learn how to trade.

Did it do all that was needed?


• However, the NEP did not totally solve Russia’s economic problems.
• Recovery has been described by historians as erratic and uncertain.
• Agriculture recovered faster than industry – incentive was there – now that he could ake money
it meant that farmers could grow surplus and therefore make some money.
• The disaster that had been WWI and the pain of the Civil War and War Communism had
devastated the Russian economy.
• Sustained advances in the economy would take centuries.
• Factories did start to produce goods but few people had the expendable `1money to buy them.
• As workers could be dismissed, unemployment started to grow.
• Lenin allowed industry to use foreign capital – but few countries were brave enough to invest in
the fledgling Communist state.
• Money had to be earned from exporting produce that could not be sold in Russia.
• Exporting grain and coal helped to kick-start Russia’s economy and by 1924-25, Russia’s imports
were nine times higher than 1921-22 level.
• Though this would seem a major achievement in just 3 years, the 1921-22 figure was so small
that the increase is not as spectacular as it would first appear – not that they admitted this to
the people.

Why did it anger some Bolsheviks?

• Loyal Bolsheviks were angry at a new class of ‘get rich quick’ businessmen who took advantage
of this new ‘capitalist’ approach.
• They were unhappy at how these new men flaunted their new wealth.
• ‘NEPmen’ as they were called flaunted their wealth in bars, nightclubs and newly opened
casinos.
• Some people declared that NEP actually stood for ‘New Exploitation of the Proletariat’.
• Lenin never pretended that the NEP was anything other than a surrender of his principles for the
sake of political survival.
• He described it as a tactical economic retreat.
But why was it needed?
• However, an expanding economy needed a decent transport system.
• The civil war had decimated Russia’s rail system.
• 1921: 50% of Russia’s trains were off the tracks due to a lack of repairs and skilled men needed
to repair them.
• 1923: a huge effort was needed to build up the rail system and the rail system carried 45% more
passengers and 59% more goods than two years earlier.
• 1927: the number of people/goods carried by trains passed the 1913 figure.
• If advances were made in the rail system, roads remained massively backward with transport
being almost wholly based on horse and cart.

Currency Issues
• The NEP also needed a stable currency and this was difficult to achieve after such huge economic
dislocation in such a short space of time.
• The rouble of 1922 had an inflationary value of 60,000 over the 1913 figure – and the 1922
budget was based on the pre-war rouble.
• The rouble was discredited and associated with the old regime.
• Therefore, a new currency was needed, and a decision to do this took place in July 1922.
• It was to be called the chervonets.
• By 1923, the paper rouble became worthless.
• The new economy was backed by gold so the demand for the chervonets was high and it
became the sole currency in February 1924.
• The task of moving Russia to a new currency was handed over to the State Bank.
• Such was the move to this new currency, that the state had a financial budget surplus at the end
of 1925.
• This was a major achievement – but as with anything in Russia, it did disguise problems.
• Many financial transactions in rural areas were still done in a form of bartering as the economic
modernisation being witnessed in the cities had yet to fully transfer itself to the countryside.
• This imbalance was to lead to a major economic problem – the so-called ‘Scissors Crisis’.

Still Major Issues despite a New Government


• October 1923: industrial prices were three times higher than agricultural prices.
• An incentive to produce more food in the countryside had led to much higher production.
• With so much food around, prices for farm produce fell when compared to industrial prices as
industry, by the very nature of it, took longer to recover (the re-building of factories/equipment
etc).
• Compared to the countryside, costs in industry were high.
• Farming was still based around physical labour so there was never a shortage of workers in the
countryside.
• Equipment remained primitive and cheap. However, the farmers were producing in quantity.
• Their produce was food, primarily grain, as they knew that this could be sold in the cities – and
the driving force was legally to make a profit.
• Industries based on cotton found that they were stil starved of their most basic raw material as
the farmers knew that food was a much better bet to grow.
• The Bolsheviks could not allow the cities to get hungry again.
• Therefore, the government became the principle purchaser of food but they used their position
to force down the price that the farmers wanted.
• With less money, the farmers had less capital to buy products from the cities.
• The government responded to this by forcing down the prices of manufacturing produce and
decrees were issued that controlled prices.
• Nobody was making much profit!!!
• Government interference in the economy was never far away.

The NEP transformed agriculture.


• War Communism had taken away any incentive to produce as the state requisitioned all surplus
food.
• NEP brought back the incentive to farm productively as surplus food could be sold and profits
were taxes.
• The introduction of a food tax – prodnalog – was a simple recognition that the food produced
equalled private property.
• If it was anything else, how could it be taxed?
• After 1917-18, land was reapportioned.
• The huge estates of Nicholas II’s reign were now divided up.
• By 1927, there were 25 million peasant holdings in Russia (98.3% of all farmed land) and given
decent weather, many of these holdings, post-War Communism, made a reasonable living.
• The extremes of poverty and riches in the countryside had diminished.
• However, farming was still relatively backward and many peasant communities used strip
farming and the three-field system.
• Modern crop rotation was rarely used and even by 1928, 5.5 million households still used the
sokha – a wooden plough.
• Therefore, while the production of food increased greatly, it could have been so much better.
• The most powerful of the peasants were the wealthier kulaks who made extra money by selling
their surplus seed to the poorer peasants in times of need.
• Lenin saw the way ahead for the peasants as mechanisation.
• This would increase food production and stimulate industrial production in the factories.
• Above all else, Lenin wanted to restore agriculture to pre-war levels so that it recovered from
the devastation caused by two wars.
• In this he was very successful.
• In 1913, the area of sown land was 105 million hectares. By 1922, this had dropped to 77.7
million hectares but by 1925 had recovered to 104.3 million hectares.
• In 1913, the number of horses on farms was 35.5 million. By 1922, this had dropped to 24.1
million but by 1925, the number of horses stood at 27.1 million.
• In 1913, the number of pigs on farms was 20.3 million. By 1922, this had dropped to 12 million
but by 1925, the number of pigs stood at 21.8 million.
• In 1913, the amount of grain grown was 80 million tons.
• By 1922, it had risen to 50.3 million tons and by 1925, the figure stood at 72.5 million tons.
• The government bought 75% of this.
• What could be exported was, but this figure declined as the 1920’s advanced as Lenin and his
successors wanted the cities fed.
• The government hoped to get the perfect solution – the peasants had their produce bought and
the city workers were able to feed themselves.
• Compared to the disaster of War Communism, it was.
• Compared to the utter economic dislocation caused by World War One, it can also be seen as a
success.
• There were many major problems to address post-1918.
• The NEP had started to do just this by the late 1920’s.
• There were still many more problems to solve and Stalin attempted to do this with
collectivisation.
• The Bolsheviks could not allow people to think that a relaxation of control over the economy
through the NEP could be followed through in other areas.
• Lenin made it very clear that there was to be no let up in his ‘iron rule’.
• SR’s and Mensheviks were suppressed.
• The OGPU enlarged its targets to include political detainees.

You might also like