SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
TITLE SHOULD BE INVERTED PYRAMID, 14 PT, BOLD, ALL CAPS, IDEALLY
12 TO 16 WORDS
A Research Paper Presented to the
Faculty of Academic Track
Tanza National Trade School
Paradahan I, Tanza, Cavite
In Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Subject
Practical Research II
FIRST NAME M. LAST NAME
Month and Year of Defense
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
The body of a manuscript opens with an introduction that presents the
specific problem under study and describes the research strategy. The introduction
enables the reader to see at a glance the entire contents of the research work. The
researcher should be able to explain to the reader the general concept that underlies
the study.
Before writing the introduction, consider the following questions: Why is this
problem important? If other aspects of this study have been reported previously,
how does this report differ from, and build on the earlier report? Rationale and
Research Gaps need to be identified.
A good introduction answers these questions in just a few paragraphs, and by
summarizing the relevant arguments and the past evidence, gives the reader a firm
sense of the background of the study and what was done, and why. Remember to
cite references for ideas taken from other sources (Author, year).
Statement of the Problem
This is the key of the research. It presents the major problem, which is
further discussed into subproblems that are researchable units addressed one at a
time.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
Steps in writing the statement of the problem:
1. Write the general problem.
2. Write the specific questions to be answered. Consider the following in writing the
research questions:
a. Start with the general objective and end with the end-view of your research.
b. Arrange the questions chronologically.
c. A research question is a question that CAN be answered in an objective way, at
least partially and at least for now.
d. Make sure that the research question can be answered using information that
already exists or that can be collected.
Hypothesis (Singular) Hypotheses (Plural)
The following hypotheses will be tested at 0.05 level of significance:
Ho1: Example: There is no significant relationship between the intelligence quotient
and the research writing skills of students.
Ho2: Example: There is no significant relationship between the intelligence quotient
and the research writing skills of students.
Note that qualitative studies do not have a hypothesis. Also, we only raise research
hypotheses for research problems that will be answered by inferential or
correlational statistics.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
Significance of the Study
The significance of the study includes possible contributions of the research
to the field of knowledge. In writing the significance of the study, list all beneficiaries
of the research. Then, discuss in two to three sentences the specific benefit they will
get from the thesis.
Write here the significance of your paper. Who will benefit from the findings
and what will they get from it? You may write it in paragraph form, or you may list
them down like this:
The researcher believed that the study is significant and noteworthy.
Specifically, it is beneficial to the following:
Students. The study could provide students more opportunities to love writing and
delete the notion that writing is dull as a field. This could also help them become
more responsible for their own learning by transforming them from being passive
recipients of information to being self-motivated, active meaning-makers, and expert
learners.
Teachers. This study could be of great help to the teachers of writing, especially
those teaching in the senior high school level, for it would provide them with
strategies related to the new trends the curriculum offers.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
Administrators. The results of this study could help administrators realize the need
for teachers to provide appropriate and new learning strategies to students in the
field of writing, specifically in the senior high school level.
Education Officials and Policy Makers. This study could encourage officials in the
education sector to motivate education leaders to acknowledge the Project-Based
Learning highlighting the Cognitivism and Social Constructivism in the teaching of
academic writing. Better yet, this research can encourage them to endorse a 21st
century method of teaching, especially in the senior high school level.
Curriculum Planners. The results of this study could provide curriculum planners
with the insights necessary for evaluating and monitoring the educational scheme or
curriculum. They may draw up plans to prepare teachers for a more active role in the
improvement and enhancement of the curriculum based on students' needs.
Future Researchers. Through the results of the study, educational researchers may
be guided and inspired to explore and study more about how to teach writing.
Scope and Delimitations
The scope presents the inclusions of the study, while delimitations present
what are not covered in the study or cannot be controlled for acceptable reasons. In
writing the scope and delimitations, discuss the scope and the limits or things not
included in the research. Include also a discussion on the scope and limit of the
research instrument or the product of the research.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
This section describes the extent of the study including the parameters
evaluated. It also discusses the weaknesses of the research in terms of methodology,
framework, and others. The scope composes the total area of the study establishing
the parameters and indicating the cut-offs of the projects.
In identifying the nature of the study, it is best to consider the area and time
coverage, area of sampling and the scope of treatment as these will provide the
information concerning the who, what, when, where, and how of the study.
What to write in the Scope? Include discussions on the physical scope of the study;
subjects and independent variables; sources of data; methodology; time; and
controls for internal and external validity.
Limitations refer to the elements over which the researcher has no control.
These are potential weaknesses in the study. For example, the study will use a self-
report instrument that may result in biased ratings of the construct. Limitations also
explain how the researcher intends to deal with the limitations he/she is aware of so
as not to affect the outcome of the study.
Please write in paragraph format, as demonstrated in the example below:
This study was conducted to test the effectiveness of the Project-Based
Learning strategy in teaching English for Academic and Professional Purposes. It
dwelled on the following topics: academic writing, particularly reaction, concept, and
position papers among the Grade 12 students of Siena College of Taytay. The study
was only limited to academic writing-both the concepts and actual application.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
Moreover, this study was limited only to the outputs of the two classes in the
English for Academic and Professional Purposes of the Grade 12 level. Each class had
40 respondents. The study was conducted during the first semester of academic year
2018-2019.
The pretests and posttests were administered to test the effectiveness of the
strategy. The tests were a combination of knowledge and skills as well as actual
academic writing tests.
All outputs done during the teaching-learning process were evaluated
through the use of researcher-made analytic rubric. The purpose of using a rubric
was to avoid biases. The rubric was objective in nature; thus, the researcher and two
other evaluators checked the Content, Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and
Mechanics in the papers.
Theoretical Framework
This is a research framework based on a particular theory. It makes use of
tested theories related to the research topic/objective. Theories are generalized
observations/statements that explain facts or phenomena.
The theoretical framework can be developed by reading literature. Kumar
(2011, Chapter 3) provided some guidelines on how to develop it. He noted that:
As you start reading the literature, you will soon discover that the problem
you wish to investigate has its roots in several theories that have been developed
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
from different perspectives. The information obtained from different books and
journals now needs to be sorted under the main themes and theories, highlighting
agreements and disagreements among the authors and identifying the unanswered
questions or gaps. You will also realize that the literature deals with many aspects
that have a direct or indirect bearing on your research topic. Use these aspects as a
basis for developing your theoretical framework. Your review of the literature should
sort out the information, as mentioned earlier, within this framework. Unless you
review the literature in relation to this framework, you will not be able to develop a
focus in your literature search: that is, your theoretical framework provides you with
a guide as you read. This brings us to the paradox mentioned previously: until you go
through the literature you cannot develop a theoretical framework, and until you
have developed a theoretical framework you cannot effectively review the literature.
The solution is to read some of the literature and then attempt to develop a
framework, even a loose one, within which you can organize the rest of the
literature you read. As you read more about the area, you are likely to change the
framework. However, without it, you will get bogged down in a great deal of
unnecessary reading and note-taking that may not be relevant to your study.
Literature pertinent to your study may deal with two types of information –
universal and more specific (i.e. local trends or a specific program). In writing about
such information, you should start with the general information, gradually narrowing
it down to the specific.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
Conceptual Framework
This framework is based on the researcher’s idea of how the research
problem will have to be explored. It is normally founded on the theoretical
framework. It describes/summarizes the relationships between the variables and
presents relevant research that supports the relationship. It presents a schematic
diagram of the relationships between key variables.
Whereas the theoretical framework consists of the theories or issues in which
your study is embedded, the conceptual framework describes the aspects you
selected from the theoretical framework to become the basis of your inquiry. The
conceptual framework grows out of the theoretical framework, previous research,
and relates to the specific research problem. That is why the conceptual framework
is the basis of your research problem (Kumar, 2011).
If you will use a figure to illustrate your conceptual framework, you have to
be careful with the use of shapes and arrows. Take note of the following
information:
1. Use simple shapes – boxes or circles. In using more advanced statistical tools such
as structural equation modeling, the use of shapes and circles have meanings. The
boxes and circles are referred to as conceptual bins.
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK
Examples:
2. Use simple lines and arrows. Take note that the presence/absence of arrowheads
means a lot in the framework especially for establishing correlation/causation
among the variables. Study the following arrows and their meanings:
Definition of Terms
Important words, specialized terms, or technical expressions should be given their
authoritative and/or operational definitions in the context of the study. Definitions should
have an authoritative basis (taken from books, etc.), thus sources are cited. Operational
definitions are usually based on authoritative definitions, although with slight variations to
suit the needs of the proposed study.
Operational definition
Conceptual definition
vs. -how the term applied or used in
- The basic dctionary definition
research
- The universal meaning of the terms
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL – ACADEMIC TRACK