Advanced Investment Appraisal
Advanced Investment Appraisal
APPLY FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES TO PERFORM
COMPLEX INVESTMENT
APPRAISAL
Learning Outcome
a) Explain factors to be considered in investment
appraisal analysis other than quantitative
factors
b) Explain the impact non-financial factors on
making an appropriate investment decisions
c) Calculate risk and inflation into investment
appraisal using various techniques
d) Perform investment appraisal (Calculate optimal
investment and capital rationing)
Other factors that may need to be considered beyond basic
investment appraisal analysis
i. Assessment of Risk
ii. Subjective factors
iii. Intangible factors
iv. Limitations in data and
information
Assessment of risk
The terms risk and uncertainty have different meanings though in
practical life they are sometimes used interchangeably.
Risk refers to quantifiable sets of circumstances, to which probabilities
can be assigned. implications:
i. Expected returns may vary in the future
ii. Different outcomes are possible
iii. risk increases proportionately with the project life
iv. risk also increases proportionately with the greater variability
v. companies show more concern for the ‘downside risk’ (i.e.
possibility of receiving lower returns than expected in comparison
to a higher return than expected)
vi. probabilities can be assigned, and the risks can be quantified
Cont.……
Uncertainty refers to a situation where it
is impossible to assign probabilities to sets of
circumstances.
implications.
Different outcomes are possible.
Assignment of probabilities or quantification of
costs and benefits is difficult mainly due to little
past experience.
2. Subjective factors
a)Capital Structure
Aims of investment appraisals is to maximize shareholder
wealth.
The company value is influenced by the way it is financed;
therefore, the capital structure should be used to its full
potential.
Beyond the basic investment appraisal analysis, management
needs to also consider the way it decides to finance a project.
It needs to identify the optimum capital structure which
involves external debt and internal capital through shares, for
example, and then choose the option that leads to the highest
shareholder wealth.
Cont….
b) Inflation
Inflation is also a subjective factor as the
impact of inflation on an investment
appraisal is forward looking and therefore,
only an estimate can be made as to what
the rate is anticipated to be.
3. Intangible factors
b) Management vs. Shareholders
There is often a difference between the interests and opinions of
management compared to shareholders.
Therefore, within the investment appraisal analysis this intangible
factor should also be taken into consideration.
This intangible factor takes into consideration incentives and
information problems that occur due to the information being
interpreted by different people, with their own opinions and
perspectives.
The interests or incentives of both parties make the information
on the project sensitive to the available resources of the
company.
Cont…
b) Characteristics of those in charge of
governance
Certain research has shown that the characteristics of the Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) of an organization can influence the
investment policy implemented by the firm. Any misrepresentation in
the policy can lead to over confident management together with
over estimation in the cash flow calculations of the project’s return,
mainly in cases with excess cash flow.
On the other hand, if the CEO is uncertain of its rewards as a result
of investment decisions, the level of investments undertaken by the
company is expected to be low.
Similar to the point above, shareholders require an effective
incentive scheme to encourage management to make investment
decisions that are in the best interests of the firm and be value
enhancing.
4. Limitations in data and
information
a) Source of data and information
The information used in the calculations or
assessment of non-financial factors has an impact
on the advice given.
There are a number of sources of information,
such as via television, newspapers, magazines,
word of mouth etc.
There are limitations in this type of information,
as it is dependent on where the data has come
from.
b)Quality of information
Similar to the above point, the presentation and quality of the
information impacts the decision made.
c) IT limitations
there can be limitations in information due to the limitations of IT
functionality.
The company may not have the appropriate IT resource to perform
a full estimation of a project and then perform sensitivity analysis as
an example.
Cont……..
d) Availability of experts
For certain projects, management may require the use of experts
in the performance of evaluating a potential project.
The company may not have sufficient resources to perform the
calculations themselves or the technical knowledge, in which case
external experts may be required.
It is possible that management are unable to spend the capital on
experts or that the required level of experts for the particular
project are not available, which has an impact on the reliability of
the information.
The impact non-financial factors on making an
appropriate investment decisions –Qualitative factors
After the quantitative analysis is completed, management then need
to make a decision on which project (s) to implement or whether
the project being reviewed should be accepted or not.
However, management will not automatically base this decision purely
on whether the project has a positive NPV or whether one
alternative has a higher overall return than other projects.
In this decision, they will need to take into account non-financial
factors that may affect the project (s).
A company has used the NPV method of appraisal on Project X,
which has a positive NPV and therefore, financially will increase the
value of the company. However, the project involves some damage to
the environment, and this factor alone can change the decision to
accept the project, due to the adverse impact it will have on the
company’s image.
Cont…..
i. Legal issues: any legal issues the company may face as a result of undertaking
the project, e.g. whether the project will meet the requirements of current and
future legislation etc.
ii. Ethical issues: a project may be legal, but if the actions involved in the project
are deemed unethical, this can have severe adverse impact on the company’s
image and reputation.
iii. Industry issues: e.g. does the project conform to industry standards and good
practice.
iv. Government regulation: this can include various regulations such as
employment laws, environmental law, competition law and also planning
permissions given by local governments etc.
v. Environmental issues: e.g. will the project have an adverse impact on the
surrounding environment.
vi. Strategy of company: consideration needs to be given as to whether the
project is in-line with the aims and objectives of the business.
vii. Impact on various relationships: will the project lead to improved staff
morale, better relations with suppliers, customers and local community.
viii. Developing the skills of the company: will the project lead to an increase in
skills and experience in a particular field, which overall leads to stronger
capabilities.
Incorporate risk and inflation into the investment
appraisal using various techniques/models.
Techniques of adjusting for risk and
uncertainty
a)Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis is a method used to
estimate the risk of an investment project by
evaluating how much the NPV of the project
changes when the variables from which it has
been calculated change.
Relevant variables
The following items can be considered as
relevant variables while calculating the net
present value (NPV) of a project.
Methods used for sensitivity
analysis
a) Quantifying the change in each key
variable that will make the NPV zero.
b) Changing each key variable by a set
percentage and checking the impact on
the NPV.
c) Certainty equivalent approach
i) Quantifying the change in each variable that will
make the NPV zero
In this method, it is verified as to how much change in each key variable will
cause the NPV to become zero.
These changes are converted into percentage terms.
Then a conclusion is reached about which variables are most important.
It can be said that the project is more sensitive to those variables of which
even a small percentage change can cause the NPV to become zero.
Management needs to keep a close watch on these variables if it wants the
project to succeed.
Example
A 3% reduction in sales volume is sufficient to make the NPV of a project zero.
As against this, it requires a 15% increase in the initial investment to make the
NPV of a project zero. This project is more sensitive to reduction in sales
volume. Management needs to take care that the sales volume does not dip.
ii)Changing each variable by a set
percentage and checking the impact on the
NPV
Since we are more concerned with the downside risk, a
percentage change that will reduce the NPV is considered.
The project is more sensitive to the variables that cause
higher reduction.
Example
A 5% reduction in the selling price reduces the NPV by
Tshs 50,000,000; a 5% reduction in sales volume reduces
the NPV by Tshs 10,000,000. The project is more sensitive
to changes in sales price than to changes in sales volume.
Limitations of sensitivity
analysis
a) Only one variable can be changed at a time. This
requires that the changes in each key variable
must be isolated.This may be unrealistic.
b) This analysis only identifies key variables. It does
not assess the risk in the real sense, since it does
not consider the probabilities or likelihood of
variables actually changing.
c) Management may not have control over the key
factors, even if they are identified.
d) Unless parameters are set, this analysis in itself
does not provide a decision rule.
b) Probability analysis
Instead of using single point estimates that have been used so far, a
probability distribution of expected cash flows can be prepared. It can be
used to arrive at an expected NPV. This probability analysis can be used to
find out the possibility of achieving a negative NPV and the probability of the
best- and worst-case scenario.
Simple probability distributions may just have a few probabilities.
Economic
Conditions Moderate Good
Probability 0.7 0.3
Cash Flow ( Tshs
000’s) 375,000 525,000
Find the expected value (EV) of the project’s NPV assuming that the economic conditions in
Year 2 are not dependant on Year 1. Also find out how much is the risk that NPV will become
negative.
Standard deviation of NPV
Example
Two mutually exclusive projects P or Q
are to be considered by Grill Plc. There is
some uncertainty about the running costs
with each project. The probability
distribution of the NPV for each project
has been estimated as follows:
NPV Tshs million Project probability NPV TZS Million Project Q probability
-10 0.15 5 0.2
10 0.2 10 0.3
15 0.35 20 0.4
35 0.3 30 0.1
Which project should the company opt for?
Step 1: Calculation of the EV of
the NPV for project P and Q
P
NPV Tshs million Project probability EV TZS million
-10 0.15 -1.5
10 0.2 2
15 0.35 5.25
35 0.3 10.5
16.25
Q
NPV TZS Million Project Q probability EV TZS million
5 0.2 1
10 0.3 3
20 0.4 8
30 0.1 3
15
Project P has higher EV of NPV, but we need to find out the risk
of variation in the NPV above or below the EV;
this is to be measured by Standard Deviation of the NPV. It can
be calculated as:
S=√𝑃(𝑥 − ̅)2
Where, x is the EV of the NPV
Step 2: Calculation of Standard
Deviation of a project’s NPV
X TZS Million P X- ̅X Tshs million P(X- X ̅) 2TZS
-1.5 0.15 -17.75 47.26
𝑥 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥
2 0.2 -14.25 40.61
5.25 0.35 -11 42.35
10.5 0.3 -5.75 9.92
140.14
Project P Project Q
SD=√140.14 SD=√140.14
= 11.838 = 10.789
= TZS 11.838m TZS 10.789m
Cont…
Project P has higher EV of NPV, it also has higher
standard deviation of NPV and therefore has a higher
risk attached to it. Selection of a project depends on the
management’s appetite to risk.
If the management is risk averse, it will select the less
risky project, Project Q.
If the management is prepared to take a risk with a low
NPV in the hope of a higher NPV, it will select Project P.
3. Evaluation of probability
analysis
This method is growing in popularity. The fact
that it is based on the subjective estimates of
the managers does not reduce their utility.
These estimates are made by the managers on
the basis of the information available.
They represent the assessments of the
likelihood of future events. Such assessments
are made by the managers regularly in the
normal course of business.
c) Simulation
One major limitation of sensitivity analysis is that it analyses the sensitivity of the
project’s NPV to changes in one variable at a time. In reality, a change in one
variable may have knock-on effects on another.
Simulation models are useful to handle changes in more than one variable at a time.
They determine by repeated analysis, how simultaneous changes in these variables
affect NPV. This method is also called Monte Carlo method.
The following steps are included while using a simulation model for appraising a
project:
a) For each project variable, a range of random numbers is assigned to the values at
different probabilities.
b) A computer generates a set of random numbers and uses these numbers to
randomly select a value for each variable.
c) NPV of this set of variables is calculated.
d) This process is repeated and a frequency distribution of the NPVs is generated.
e) From the frequency distribution, the expected NPV and its standard deviation are
calculated.
However, the variables are likely to be interdependent, e.g. an increase in prices may
reduce sales volume. Simple simulation models assume that these factors are
unrelated to each other. Such interrelationships are frequently complex to model.
Example
The Finance executive of J.W. Pillers Plc has drawn the
following projections with probability distributions
Wages and Proba
Raw material Probability Sales revenue Probability
salaries bility
Tshs
Tshs million Tshs million
million
10-Aug 0.3 8-Jun 0.2 28-32 0.1
12-Oct 0.5 10-Aug 0.3 32-36 0.2
14-Dec 0.2 12-Oct 0.3 36-40 0.5
14-Dec 0.2 40-44 0.2
Fixed costs are Tshs 12,000,000 and available cash balance is Tshs 52,000,000.
Students are required to simulate the cash flow projection and expected cash balance at
the end of the sixth month. Use the following random numbers:
1 30 11 9 12 -2 50
2 38 13 11 12 2 52
3 38 13 7 12 6 58
4 42 11 7 12 12 70
5 30 13 9 12 -4 66
6 34 11 9 12 2 68
From the above simulation it will be observed that there are 4 months which have net cash inflows, the probability of net cash inflows can therefore be estimated as
4/6 = 0.66. From the above table, the estimated cash balance at the end of sixth month is Tshs 68,000,000.
2. Expected Value (EV) Method
of Cash Flow Projection
Tshs
million
EV of salaries and wages (9 x 0.3) + (11 x 0.5) + (13 x 0.2) 10.8
EV of raw materials (7 x 0.2) + (9 x 0.3) + (11 x 0.3) + (13 x 0.2) 10
EV of sales revenue (30 x 0.1) + (34 x 0.2) + (38 x 0.5) + (42 x 0.2) 37.2
Expected net cash inflow per month Tshs 37.2 – 10.8 – 10.0 – 12.0 4.4
Expected cash balance after six months Tshs 52.0 + (4.4 x 6) 78.4
The dif erence between Tshs 68,000,000 and Tshs 78,400,000 is due to sample errors. If a number of simulation iterations were carried out, then the mean of the balances
predicted should approach the expected value more closely as the number is increased.
Inflation incorporated into
investment appraisal
The above case study shows that the factors of inflation
and taxation affect the investment decisions.You may be
wondering how these are reviewed in investment
decisions.
In this Study Guide, we understand the techniques used
to do this. In our discussions on DCF methods so far,
the effect of inflation was considered, but the impact on
investment decisions were not detailed.
This Study Guide discusses how when inflation
increases, the rate of return expected by the investors
also goes up.
Real vs. nominal cash flows (the effect of
inflation on investment appraisal)
Real cash flows are cash flows that have
not been subjected to inflation.
Nominal cash flows or money cash flows
have been influenced by inflation.
Example
Steve will receive Tshs 100,000,000 in cash next
year. During the year, inflation of 3% is expected.
Next year, the nominal value will be Tshs
100,000,000 but the real value (after stripping
away the effects of inflation) will be Tshs
97,087,379 ( Tshs 100,000,000 / 1.03).
The discount rate used in assessing projects so far, has been
the real rate of return required by investors. This is the rate
which compensates investors for the risk of undertaking the
activity and for not being able to use the money. Since inflation
erodes the purchasing power of money, investors will require
compensation for this additional factor. Therefore, the rate of
return required for investments will increase.
The rate of interest which incorporates the real rate and the
inflation rate is known as the nominal or money rate of return.
It can be calculated using the following formula:
(1 + Nominal rate or money rate) = (1+ Real rate) x (1+ Inflation
rate)
If Steve’s real rate of return required is 10% and inflation is 3%, the effective nominal rate wil be:
Nominal rate = (1+ 0.10) x (1+ 0.03) – 1
1.10 x 1.03 - 1
1.133 - 1
0.133
13.3%
Which rate is to be used for
discounting?
The answer depends upon which cash
flows are being discounted. If real cash
flows are being discounted, the real cost
of capital should be used.
If nominal cash flows are being
discounted, the nominal cost of capital
should be used.
Continuing Steve’s example
from above
Nominal cash flow Tshs 100,000,000
Nominal cost of capital 13.3% Discounted value of the
cash flow = Tshs 100,000,000/1.133 Tshs 88,261,253
Assuming Fisher’s real cost of capital is 8 per cent, is the project viable? Ignore taxation for this question
Perform investment appraisal (Calculate
optimal investment and capital rationing)
Capital rationing arises when the amount of funds
available for investments are restricted or limited.
This restriction on funds may apply to only one
time period (single period capital rationing) or
may extend indefinitely into the future (multi-
period capital rationing).
In both cases, the finance manager must ensure
that projects yielding the greatest returns are
prioritised. In this Study Guide the issues relating
to single period capital rationing are discussed.
Calculation of profitability indexes for
divisible investment projects
Cumulative
Optimum investment schedule: NPV (
investment
Tshs 000’s) ( Tshs 000’s)
Tshs 1,250,000 invested in Project A 1,625 1,250
Tshs 1,625,000 invested in Project B 1,790 2,875
Tshs 1,325 invested in Project C ( Tshs
1,325 4,200
4,200,000 - 1,250,000 - 1,625,000)* Total
NPV for $4200 invested: 4,740
(4,200 − 2,875)
* × 2,000 ( Tshs 000’s)
2,000
As project C and D have the highest NPV, so the optimum investment schedule is a
combination of project C and D.
Nature of project Meaning Approach to decision making
(a) Determine the combination of
Indivisible (no fractional investment) Investment should be made in full.
projects to
utilise the available amount
Partial / proportional investment is not (b) Calculate the NPV of each
possible. combination
(c) Select the combination with the
highest NPV
Partial investment is possible and (a) Compute the profitability indices (PI)
Divisible (fractional investment) proportional NPV can be generated of various projects and rank them
b) Select the projects based on
maximum PI
Reasons for capital rationing
Ideally, a company would prefer to implement all possible
projects that will maximise the shareholder value if it had
unlimited capital.
In theory, any project can be put to market so as to raise funds.
However, in reality there is a limit to the amount of capital that a
company has or can raise from the capital market.
This gives rise to the need for capital rationing.
The reasons for capital rationing may arise due to external
restrictions by the capital market, in which case it is called ‘hard
capital rationing’.
Alternatively, they may arise due to internal limits imposed by the
managers, in which case it is called ‘soft capital rationing.
Hard capital rationing may be caused
due to any of the following reasons:
(a) If capital markets are depressed, raising money may
not be possible.
(b) Based on the credit appraisals, the financial institutions may
consider lending to a company too risky.
(c) Cost of capital issue may be disproportionate, especially if the
amount of capital requirement is small.
(d) Due to the credit policy of the government, there may be
restrictions on lending.
In reality, hard capital rationing is less frequent. Most of
the capital rationing is self imposed (soft).
Soft capital rationing may be caused by any of the
following reasons:
Divisible
Indivisible
Topic 6
APPLY FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES TO MANAGE
WORKING CAPITAL
Learning Outcomes
Explain working capital management
Explain principles underlying effective management of working
capital
Explain working capital policies and its impact of each on
profitability and liquidity position of the business
Estimate the working capital requirements of a firm
Decide on the level of inventory
Determine credit policy variables and their impact on the wealth
of the shareholders as well as managing collections
Determine the optimal cash balance (Baumol’s and Miller-Orr
models)
Concept of working capital
Gross working capital refers to the firm’s investment in
current assets. Current assets are basically those assets which
can be liquidated within a period of twelve months in the normal
course of business. . Example - inventory, debtors, cash and bank
etc. Gross working capital gives us an idea of the total
investment required in the various forms of current assets. The
planning for short term financing starts with estimation of gross
working capital needs.
Net working capital is the difference between current assets
and current liabilities. It helps us to understand the short-term
liquidity position of the company.
Current liabilities are those claims which must be repaid within a
period of twelve months
Current
Current assets
liabilities
Cash and bank balances Trade payables
Inventories of raw materials, work in
Current tax liability
progress and finished goods
Trade receivables Dividends payable
Marketable financial assets Short-term loans
Long-term loans i.e. the part
Advances to suppliers
maturing within twelve months
Other liabilities payable within 12
Other assets realisable within 12 months
months
Excess working capital has its
disadvantages in terms of:
a) Funds not being put to productive use and
impact on company earnings
b) Excess inventory
c) Diluted focus on debtor control
d) Leakages in the system which might go
unnoticed due to excess liquidity
e) Inefficiency in the organization ultimately
affecting market value of the firm.
On the other hand, inadequate working capital
would be disadvantageous in terms of
Current assets
(b) = 50/150 = 33.33%
Total sales
2. Principle of risk variation
This is very critical in order to manage working capital effectively.
Generally, the higher the risk the management is willing to take,
the higher is the return that it can expect.
Risk in this case refers to the risk of non fulfillment of liabilities.
If the current assets are reduced beyond a certain level,
there will not be enough liquidity to meet all obligations.
We shall study in the subsequent Learning Outcomes how
different working capital policies are followed depending on the
management appetite for risk and reward.
3. Principle of cost of capital
In evaluating different sources of finance, one has
to be guided by the fact that different sources
have different costs of capital.
Working capital financing can happen through
debt or equity or a combination of both. While
debt capital is relatively cheaper than equity
capital (due to the tax arbitrage), overall risk also
increases with deployment of debt capital.
4. Principle of maturity of
payment
This principle requires one to match the
maturities of payment in respect of
liabilities with the flow of funds - i.e. cash
inflows and outflows should be matched
across maturities, else it would jeopardise
the liquidity and solvency position of the
firm.
Working capital management should be
guided by this principle at all times.
working capital policies and the impact of each on the profitability
and liquidity position of the business.
Permanent and temporary working capital
Current assets, by their very nature, are assets which are held by the
business for periods of twelve months or less.
These assets, in total, fluctuate depending on the level of business
activity. However, in most businesses a particular base level of
inventory is always held and cash balances are never allowed to fall
below a certain level.
These represent the proportion of current assets permanently held
i.e. the proportion of current assets which are fixed (hence the term
‘permanent current assets’). It is also called core working capital.
From this point of view, the assets of a company are classified into
non-current assets, permanent current assets and fluctuating current
assets.
Permanent working capital = Minimum inventory level + Minimum cash balance +
Level of trade receivables - Level of trade payables
The changes in working capital
occur on account of
1. Changes in policy
In case management changes its current asset policy (after
review), i.e. decides to shift to a more conservative / aggressive
policy, it would impact the working capital position.
2. Changes in sales
Current assets change in direct relation to a changes in sales. The
quantum of current assets would increase / decrease with change
in sales. For example, with an increase in sales there would be an
increase in stock, receivables, collections etc.
3.Technological improvements
Technological advancements would have a positive impact on
improving efficiency and thereby reducing the working capital
cycle. This would change the working capital position of the firm.
Distinction between Fluctuating Current Assets,
Permanent Current Assets and Non-Current
Assets
Working capital policies
Working capital policy is concerned
with policy decisions such as:
i. Maintaining an adequate amount of
working capital (current assets and
current liabilities)
ii. Deciding on the sources of finance of
working capital
1. Maintaining an adequate amount of
working capital (current assets and current
liabilities)
Cont….
The current ratio mainly gives an idea of the company's ability to
pay back its current liabilities i.e. short-term debt and payables
with its current assets i.e. cash, inventory and receivables.
The higher the current ratio, the more capable the company is of
paying its obligations. This is because a high current ratio depicts
that the company has more current assets as compared to its
current liabilities. Furthermore, a ratio less than 1 suggests that
the company would be unable to pay off its obligations if they fall
due at that point.
The current ratio can give an idea of the efficiency of a
company's operating cycle or its ability to turn its products into
cash.
Cont…
Example
The following information is extracted from the
financial statements of Padidas Co
20X9 20X0
Tshs
Tshs million
million
Current Assets
650 700
Inventory
Trade receivables 900 1,030
Cash and bank 50 75
Total current assets 1,600 1,805
Current liabilities
490 410
Trade payables
Bank overdraft 480 530
Total current Liabilities 970 940
Credit sales 5,100 5,300
Total sales 6,200 7,300
Credit purchases 2,500 2,600
Cost of sales 6,100 6,800
Average production period is 30 days.
Let’s calculate current ratio and quick ratio.
Curre nt ra tio
Current assets 1600 1805
Current liabilities 970 940
1.65 1.92
Quick ra tio
Quick assets 950 1105
Quick liabilities 490 410
1.938 2.695
Total w orking
Permanent Temporary
Month
capital required
( Tshs m) ( Tshs m)
( Tshs m)
Any lender of working capital finance has to first estimate the operating cycle of the
company to determine the credit limit required. The faster the movement of stock, debtors
etc., the lower is the length of the operating cycle. It is in the interest of the company to
reduce the working capital cycle to the extent possible in order to minimise the requirement
for external funds.
Cont..
Average time the raw material remains in inventory 1.5
Less: Credit period allowed by suppliers (2)
Time taken to convert raw material into finished goods 1
Average time the finished goods remain in inventory Negligible
Credit period allowed to customers 1
Cash cycle period 1.5
Estimation of working capital on the basis of current
1. Current
assets and current liabilities
assets
Sr Current
Formula
no. asset
{Budgeted prod. X estimated raw mat cost /unit} X Average holding period
Raw material
1
Work-in- {Budgeted prod. X estimated WIP cost /unit} X Average holding period of WIP
2
Finished {Bud. prod. X cost of prod.(per unit exclg depreciation)} X Average holding period
3
{Est. credit sales X Cost of sales (Exclg depreciation per unit} X Avg. collection period
4 Receivables
5 Cash Estimated based on minimum required cash and bank balances to be maintained
2. Current liabilities
Sr. Current
Formula
no. liability
Trade {Budgeted prod. x estimated raw mat cost /unit} x Average credit period by suppliers
1
{Budgeted prod. x Overhead cost /unit} x average time lag in payment of overheads
2 Overheads
{Budgeted prod. x direct labour cost /unit} x Average time lag in payment of wages
3 Direct wages
Particulars Tshs Ts
Work in progress
250,000,000 X30/360
Raw materials 20,833,333
Labour 300,000,000X30/360 X 1/2 12,500,000
Overheads 100,000,000 X 30/360 X 1/2 4,166,667 37,500,0
Finished goods 650,000,000 X25/360 45,138,8
Debtors 600,000,000*60/360 100,000,0
Current assets
286,805,5
Creditors 250000000X30/360 20,833,3
Current liabilities
20,833,3
Tshs
Materials consumed (credit by suppliers: 2 months) 10,00,000
Wages paid (30 days in arrears) 7,00,000
Manufacturing expenses (outstanding at year end) (1 month in
80,000
arrears)
Sales promotion and administration expenses (quarterly in
4,00,000
advance)
Sales (credit of 60 days) 40,00,000
The company sells its products at a profit of 25%, counting depreciation as part of cost of
production. Cash balance is estimated at Tshs 1,00,000 and the company keeps one-month
stock of raw material and finished inventory. Safety margin is 10%.
Current assets
1,015,000
Current assets -
Net w orking capital 710,000
current liabilities
Add: Safety margin @10% 71,000
Workings
W1 Cost of production
The above diagram illustrates the inverse relationship between holding costs and ordering costs.
It can also be
seen that total cost is the lowest where total holding costs and total ordering costs are equal.
The following formulae will be useful in calculating ordering and
holding costs
=Average inventory x Cost of
Total cost of holding
holding one unit
Q/2 ×Cℎ
=No. of orders x Cost per order
Total cost of ordering (D/Q)xC0
Soln
Question
Nellone Co provides the following information:
Tshs
Annual requirement of component Z 50,000
Price per unit 0.12
Holding costs per year per unit 0.02
Ordering costs per order 6
Required:
100,000X15
Cost of additional working capital = Tshs 15,000
100
The total cost split as conversion cost plus opportunity cost can be
Frepresented as: [𝐶/2] + [𝑁F/C]
Drawbacks of the Baumol
model
One major problem with the Baumol model is that it
assumes that cash requirements are known and cash is
used on a steady, predictable basis. In reality, this is not
the case. Cash flows can fluctuate tremendously and
balances can therefore be uncertain.
The Miller-Orr model, as discussed below, is seen to be
superior to the Baumol model as it takes the
uncertainty of cash flows into account. It is more
realistic from this perspective.
Miller-Orr Model
This approach to cash management establishes upper and lower
cash limits and a return point (or optimal cash balance) to which
the cash balance will be restored on reaching any of the limits.
The firm buys securities when cash exceeds the upper limit and
sells securities when cash is less than the lower limit.
There are no securities transactions when cash is between the
limits. The model takes the following variables into consideration
The fixed cost of securities transactions which are assumed to be the
same for both buying and selling transactions,
The daily interest rate on marketable securities and
The variance of the daily net cash flows.
The Miller-Orr model can be
depicted by the following graph
The Miller-Orr formula
𝑆𝑆 = 3 ×((3/4×𝑇C×𝑉C)/3)1/3
Where,
S= Spread between lower and upper limits
LL= Lower point
TC= Transaction cost
VC= Variance of cash flows
i = Interest rate per day on marketable securities
Return point or Zero point = Lower limit + 1/3 x
Spread
Upper limit = Lower limit + Spread
Steps
1. Set the lower limit. (The question will
normally give this).
2. Identify the variance of cash flows.
3. Note interest rate and transaction cost.
4. Calculate spread.
5. Calculate return point by adding 1/3 of
the spread to the lower limit.
6. Calculate the upper limit by adding the
spread to the lower limit.
A company disburses a total of Tshs 50,000,000 per
year in cash. It costs Tshs 75 on an average every time
securities are sold for cash. The treasury manager
estimates that the variance of change in the daily cash
flowbalance is Tshs 20,000,000. He also establishes that
the lower cash limit is Tshs 50,000.
Required:
Calculate the return point and the upper cash limit if
the current short-term investment rate is 5%.
Daily interest rate = Rate per annum/365
= 0.05/365
= 0.000137
Spread =3 x (3/4 x 75 x 20,000,000/0.000137)1/3
=3 x (1,125,000,000/0.000137)1/3
= 3 x 20,175
= Tshs 60,525
Return point = Lower limit + 1/3 x Spread
= 50,000 + 60,525 /3
= Tshs 70,175
Upper limit = Lower limit + Spread
= 50,000 + 60,525
= Tshs 110,525