Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
40 views6 pages

LR Data

There is no significant linear relationship between productivity (m.Sq./Hr) and PA (DW %). The p-value of 0.772 from the ANOVA table is greater than 0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no linear relationship. The R-squared value of 0.018 indicates that only 1.8% of the variation in productivity is explained by the linear regression model. Adding surface water percentage to DW % does not improve the linear fit or strengthen the correlation with productivity.

Uploaded by

Mulugeta Beza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views6 pages

LR Data

There is no significant linear relationship between productivity (m.Sq./Hr) and PA (DW %). The p-value of 0.772 from the ANOVA table is greater than 0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no linear relationship. The R-squared value of 0.018 indicates that only 1.8% of the variation in productivity is explained by the linear regression model. Adding surface water percentage to DW % does not improve the linear fit or strengthen the correlation with productivity.

Uploaded by

Mulugeta Beza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

SUMMARY OUTPUT

>0.05
Regression Statistics H0
Multiple R 0.135448814619149 There is no linear relationship b/n
R Square 0.0183463813817326 PA and Productive output
(m.Sq./Hr)
Adjusted R Square -0.177984342341921
Standard Error 3.63436892191663 P=0.772158462840705
Observations 7 Accept

ANOVA
df SS MS F
Regression 1 1.23429841132 1.23429841131835 0.0934463085
Residual 5 66.043187303 13.2086374605935
Total 6 67.2774857143

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value


Intercept 17.2413075399701 12.2375856192 1.40888146375523 0.2179172965
DW (%) 0.0834001513468258 0.27282600511 0.30568988946897 0.7721584628

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

Observation Predicted Productivity (sq.m/day) Residuals Standard Residuals


1 20.7941539873448 6.47584601266 1.9519025262799
2 20.9442742597691 -1.7142742598 -0.51670411122207
3 20.8108340176142 -0.8108340176 -0.24439570741521
4 21.920056030527 0.79994396947 0.24111330810607
5 21.0109943808466 -2.5009943808 -0.7538315828768
6 20.5105934727656 1.22940652723 0.37055879674166
7 20.7190938511327 -3.4790938511 -1.04864322961355
P ≤ 0.05
H1
There is linear relationship b/n PA and
Productive output (m.Sq./Hr) DW (%)
8
P=0.772158462840705 6

Residuals
4
Reject 2
0
-2 38 40 42 4
-4
Significance F
0.772158462840705

Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%


DW (%

Productivity (sq.m/day)
-14.2164077647196 48.6990228446597 -14.216407765 48.699022845 30.0
-0.617921421682275 0.784721724375926 -0.6179214217 0.7847217244 20.0
f(x) = 0.0834
10.0 R² = 0.01834
0.0
38 42 46 5
PROBABILITY OUTPUT
DW (%)

Percentile Productivity (sq.m/day)


7.14285714285714 17.24
21.4285714285714 18.51
35.7142857142857 19.23
50 20 Normal P

Productivity (sq.m/day)
64.2857142857143 21.74 30
78.5714285714286 22.72 20
92.8571428571429 27.27
10
0
0 10 20 30
DW (%) Residual Plot
8
6
Residuals

4
2
0
-2 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58
-4
DW (%) DW (%) Line Fit Plot

Productivity (sq.m/day)
30.0 Productivity
(sq.m/day)
20.0 f(x) = 0.0834001513468257 x +Linear
17.241307539970
(Productivit
R² = 0.0183463813817325 (sq.m/day))
DW (%) Line Fit Plot 10.0
Predicted Producti
0.0
Productivity (sq.m/day)

ity (sq.m/day)
30.0 35 40 45 50 55 60
20.0 Productivity
f(x) = 0.0834001513468257 x + 17.2413075399701
(sq.m/day) DW (%)
10.0 R² = 0.0183463813817325 Linear (Productivity
0.0 (sq.m/day))

38 42 46 50 54 58
DW (%)

Normal Probability Plot


Productivity (sq.m/day)

30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Sample Percentile
ne Fit Plot
Productivity
(sq.m/day)
513468257 x +Linear
17.2413075399701
(Productivity
13817325 (sq.m/day))
Predicted Productiv-
ity (sq.m/day)
5 60
Productivity (sq.m/day Vs DW(%)
Date Productivity (sq.m/day) DW (%)
2-Jan 27.3 42.6
3-Jan 19.2 44.4
4-Jan 20.0 42.8
5-Jan 22.7 56.1
10-Jan 18.5 45.2
11-Jan 21.7 39.2
12-Jan 17.2 41.7

Productivity vs (DW + 0.25*SW)


Date Productivity (sq.m/day) DW+0.25*SW
2-Jan 27.3 52.7
3-Jan 19.2 54.3
4-Jan 20.0 53.7
5-Jan 22.7 64.9
10-Jan 18.5 54.9
11-Jan 21.7 50.0
12-Jan 17.2 50.5

Productivity vs (DW + 0.50*SW)


Date Productivity (sq.m/day) DW+0.50*SW
2-Jan 27.3 62.8
3-Jan 19.2 64.3
4-Jan 20.0 64.7
5-Jan 22.7 73.7
10-Jan 18.5 64.5
11-Jan 21.7 60.8
12-Jan 17.2 59.2

Productivity vs (DW + 0.75*SW)


Date Productivity (sq.m/day) DW+0.75*SW
2-Jan 27.3 72.8
3-Jan 19.2 74.3
4-Jan 20.0 75.6
5-Jan 22.7 82.4
10-Jan 18.5 74.2
11-Jan 21.7 71.6
12-Jan 17.2 68.0

Productivity vs (DW + SW)


Date Productivity (sq.m/day) DW+SW
2-Jan 27.3 82.9
3-Jan 19.2 84.2
4-Jan 20.0 86.5
5-Jan 22.7 91.2
10-Jan 18.5 83.8
11-Jan 21.7 82.4
12-Jan 17.2 76.7

You might also like