Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
174 views62 pages

Composite Structures - Chapter 2

This document discusses shear connections between steel beams and concrete in composite structures. It describes the requirements of shear connections to transfer shear forces at the interface. Full interaction and partial interaction connections are described, with partial allowing for some slip. Commonly used shear connectors like headed studs are discussed along with their load-slip behavior characterized through push-out tests. The effects of shear connections on the behavior of simple composite beams are examined. Methods of providing shear connection including bond and mechanical connectors are summarized. Design values for shear resistance of connectors are provided from codes.

Uploaded by

Bahru k.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
174 views62 pages

Composite Structures - Chapter 2

This document discusses shear connections between steel beams and concrete in composite structures. It describes the requirements of shear connections to transfer shear forces at the interface. Full interaction and partial interaction connections are described, with partial allowing for some slip. Commonly used shear connectors like headed studs are discussed along with their load-slip behavior characterized through push-out tests. The effects of shear connections on the behavior of simple composite beams are examined. Methods of providing shear connection including bond and mechanical connectors are summarized. Design values for shear resistance of connectors are provided from codes.

Uploaded by

Bahru k.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 62

 Mechanical connectors are used to develop

the composite action between steel beam


and concrete.
 This connection is provided mainly to
resist longitudinal shear, and is referred to
as the “shear connection”.
Requirements of Shear Connection :
 Transfer direct shear at their base
 Create a tensile link into the concrete
 Be economic to manufacture and fix

1
Full Interaction
 Infinitely stiff shear connection,
 No slip and slip strain,
 Plane sections remain plane

 With regard to resistance, the connection is


considered to be complete if the resistance of
the composite beam is decided by the
bending resistance, not the horizontal shear
resistance.

2
Partial Interaction
 Incomplete interaction arises when flexible
connectors such as headed studs are used
 slip(relative displacement) occurs at the
steel-concrete interface

3
4
5
Load-Slip Curve
 The behavior and resistance of headed studs
and other connectors are examined by means
of “shear” or “push out” tests.
 The behavior is characterised by great
stiffness at low loading(under service
conditions) and large deformations at high
loadings up to failure. Such ductile behavior
makes shear force redistribution at the steel-
concrete interface possible and allows for
partial shear connection.

6
7
2.1 Effect of shear connection on the behavior of
simple beams
 Simply-supported rectangular cross-section
 Assumption-Beam is made of linearly elastic material
with Young’s modulus E

No shear connection:
σ=MC/I
W’= w/2, c=h/2 and I= bh3/12

max = 3wL2/(8bh2)
max = 3wL/(8bh)
Mx = w(L2 – 4x2)/16

8
9
10
 Longitudinal
strain x at the bottom fiber of
the upper beam is:

x = (3w/(8Ebh2))(L2 – 4x2)

There is an equal and opposite strain in the top


fiber of the lower beam, so that the difference
between these adjacent fibers, known as slip
strain, is 2x
The end faces of the two-component beam
have the shape shown in the following Figure

11
12
 The slip at the interface, s, is zero at x=0 and
a maximum at x = L/2
 “Plane sections… remain plane”, is valid only
for the section at x = 0  “Plane sections…
do not remain plane”
 Note: slip strain is the rate of change of slip
along the beam
 Thus from above:

ds/dx = 2x= (3w/(4Ebh2))(L2 – 4x2)

13
 Integration gives slip, s:

s = (w/(4Ebh2))(3L2x– 4x3)+C1

 constant of integration is zero, since s=0


when x=0.
 At midspan, slip strain is a maximum and slip
is zero, and at the ends of the beam, slip is a
maximum and slip strain is zero.

14
Order of magnitude of maximum slip:
 Max slip occurs at x=L/2 and is equal to

Smax = wL3/4Ebh2
max = 5wL4/64Ebh3

Ratio of slip to deflection is 3.2h/L much


smaller than deflection
 Shear connection must be very stiff if it is to
be effective

15
Full Interaction
Assumptions:
 the two halves are connected by infinitely stiff
shear connection
 The two members behave as one
 Slip and slip strain are everywhere zero, and
it can be assumed that plane sections remain
plane

16
W’= w, c=h and I= b(2h)3/12
max = 3wL2/(16bh2)
max = 3wL/(8bh)
max = 5wL4/256Ebh3

 Owing to the provision of the shear


connection, the maximum shear is
unchanged, but the maximum bending stress
is halved and the deflection is reduced by a
quarter.
  shear connection increases both strength
and stiffness.

17
 Shear connection must be designed for the
longitudinal shear per unit length v, known as
the shear flow.
 In the example:  vx = xb = 3wx/(4h)
vx=wx (x=0 at the mid-span)
 Integration gives the total shear flow in a half
span:  V = 3wL2/(32h) [0-L/2]
 Typically L/(2h)  20 for beams
  the shear connection in the whole span has
to resist 2 3wL2/(32h)  8wL

18
 The shear force is eight times the load
carried by the beam, i.e. ,the shear connection
has to be very strong
 In elastic design, the shear connectors are
spaced in accordance with the shear flow
 If the design shear resistance of a connector
is PRd , the spacing s is given by: PRd  svx
(Eurocode 4 gives also maximum spacing)

19
Uplift
 Stresses tending to cause uplift can occur at
the interface.
 Shear connectors used in practice are
therefore so shaped that they provide
resistance to uplift as well as to slip (e.g. heads
in the shear studs)
 Uplift forces are so much less than shear
forces
 need not be calculated for design purposes

20
2.2Methods of Shear Connection
(a) Bond
 Where the steel component of a composite
member is surrounded by RC, as in fully
encased beam, the analogy with RC
suggests that no shear connectors need
be provided.
 Tests have shown that this is usually true
for cased stanchions and filled tubes,
where bond stresses are low, and also for
encased beams in the elastic range

21
(b) Shear Connectors
 Most widely used type of connector is the
headed stud (shank, weld collar, head)
 They range in diameter from 13 to 22mm,
and in length (h) from 50 to 525 mm
 They are made of steel with ultimate tensile
strength fu between 450-600 N/mm2 and
min elongation of 15%

22
23
24
 The maximum shear force that can be
resisted by a stud is relatively low, about 150
kN
 Other types of connector with higher strength
have been developed, primarily for use in
bridges
 These are bar with hoops, tees with hoops,
horseshoes, and channels (see figure in
Literature)

25
Shear connection for profiled steel sheeting
 Impracticable to weld shear connectors to
sheeting with t < 1mm.
 Shear connection is provided either by
pressed or rolled dimples (indentations and
protrusions) or
 By giving the profile a re-entrant shape that
prevents separation of the steel form
concrete

26
 Profiled steel sheeting

27
Shear Profiled
connector sheeting

28
Properties of shear connectors
 The property of a shear connector most
relevant to design is the relationship b/n the
shear force transmitted, P, and the slip at the
interface, s.
 This load-slip curve are determined from
standard “push tests”. The flanges of a short
length of steel I-section are connected to two
small RC slabs

29
 Details of the “standard push test” of Eurocde
4 is shown in Figure
 The slabs are bedded on the lower platen of a
CTM, and the load is applied to the upper end
of the steel section
 Slip b/n the components are measured at
several pts, and the average slip is plotted
against the load per connector
 Figure shows a typical load-slip curve for
dowels with and w/o profiled sheeting (Bode)

30
31
Figure shows that
dowel capacity in
beams w/o profiled
sheeting is higher

32
  The design shear resistance of studs with
h/d  4 (α=1)is given in Eurocde 4 as the
lesser of two values:
PRd = 0.8fu(d2/4)/v

PRd = 0.29αd2(fckEcm)1/2/v

 Where fu=ultimate tensile strength of the


steel (  500 N/mm2), v =1.25

α=0.2[(h/d)+1] for 3<h/d<4 (EBCS 4)


 d<22mm
33
 There are two situations in which the
resistance of a connector found from push
tests may be too high for use in design.
 i) repeated loading such as that due to
passage of traffic over a bridge.
 ii) the other is where the lateral restraint to
the concrete in contact with the connector is
less than that provided in a push test, as in a
haunched beam with connectors too close to
a free surface

34
 Eurocde 4 standard equations for resistance
of connectors are allowed in haunched beams
only where the x-section satisfies certain
conditions.

35
These are:
 (i) Concrete cover to the side of the connector
may not be less than 50 mm.
 (ii) The free concrete surface may not lie
within the line CD (see the Fig in the previous
slide), which runs from the base of the
connector at an angle of 45o with the steel
flange

36
Stud connectors used with profiled steel sheeting
 Eurocode 4 specifies reduction factors, applied
to the resistance PRd used for solid slabs
 For sheeting with ribs parallel to the beam,
the factor is, Kl = 0.6(bo/hp)(h/hp-1)  1.0
h is taken as not greater than hp+75 mm

37
 For sheeting with ribs transverse to the beam
the factor is:

kt = 0.7bo/((Nr)0.5hp)(h/hp-1)  1.0

 where Nr is the number of connectors in one


rib where it crosses a beam, not to be taken
as greater than 2 in calculations

38
Longitudinal shear in composite slabs
There are three types of shear connection b/n
a profiled steel sheet and a concrete slab
 (i) natural bond b/n the two sheets with re-
entrant profiles were developed (frictional
interlock)  unreliable unless separation at
the interface is prevented

39
 (ii) The second type of shear connection is
achieved by providing “mechanical interlock",
by pressing dimples or ribs in to the sheet

40
 (iii)The third type of shear connection is “end
anchorage”, This can be provided where the
end of the sheet rests on a steel beam, by
means of shot-fired pins, or by welding studs
through the sheeting to the steel flange

41
Block connectors in Solid Slabs

42
3 rd Class

43
 The m-k or shear-bond test

 The effectiveness of shear connection is


studied by means of loading tests on simply
supported slabs.

44
 The length of each shear span, Ls, is usually
L/4.

45
There are thee possible modes of failure
 (i) in flexure, at a x-section such as 1-1
 (ii) in longitudinal shear, along length such as
2-2; and
 (iii) in vertical shear, at a cross-section such
as 3-3
 The expected mode of failure in a test
depends on the ratio of Ls to the effective
depth dp of the slab

46
 The results are plotted on a diagram with
axes V/(bdp) and Ap/(bLs)
 At high Ls/dp, flexural failure occurs. The
maximum moment Mu, is given by Mu = VLs
(V = max vertical shear)
 Flexural failure is modeled by simple plastic
theory, with all the steel at its yield stress, fyp

47
 The lever arm is a little less than dp, but
approximately:
MuApfypdp

Substitution yields:

V/(bdp) = Mu/(bdpLs) Apfyp/bLs

 The strength fyp is not varied during a series of


tests, and has no influence on longitudinal shear
failure.  omitted from the axis on figure 
flexural failure plots as a straight line through
the origin (OA)
48
0

49
50
 Longitudinal shear failures occurs at
intermediate values of Ls/dp and lie near
the line
 V/(bdp) =m(Ap/(bLs) + k (Line AB)
 Where m and k are constants to be
determined by testing
 This is one of the two methods given by
Eurocode 4 to design for longitudinal
shear.

The other based on a mechanical model is


the partial interaction design method
51
 The influence of bond is minimized in the
standard test, by the application of several
thousand cycles of repeated loading up to 1.5
times the expected loading in service, before
loading to failure
 When a new profile is developed, values of m
and k have to be determined, in principle, for
each thickness of sheeting, each overall
depth of the slab, and for a range of concrete
strengths  expensive

52
Partial Interaction
Slip is not zero.
How the behaviour of a beam is modified by
the presence of slip?

53
The cross-section consists of:
 concrete slab of thickness, hc, cross-sectional
area Ac, and second moment of area Ic, and Ec
 a symmetrical steel section with corresponding
properties hs, Aa and Ia, Ea.
 The distance between the centroids of the
concrete and steel cross-sections, dc, is given by:

dc=(hc+hs)/2 and n=Ea/Ec

 Shear connectors of modulus k at uniform


spacing of p is provided.

54
 The results of the analysis are expressed in
terms of two functions of the cross-section of
the member and the stiffness of its shear
connection, α and β (British Standards
Institution).

kc is a reduction coefficient,

55
56
 The governing equation relating slip s to
distance along the beam from mid-span, x,
is:

 The boundary conditions are:

57
Effect of slip on stresses and deflections

58
 Dimensions

 Shear connectors

59
 The distribution of slip along the beam and
the stresses and curvature at mid-span are
now found by partial-interaction theory

60
 Upon substitution an expression for slop
becomes:

 The bending moment at mid-span, wL2/8,


can be considered to be the sum of a
'concrete' moment Mc, a 'steel' moment Ma,
and a 'composite' moment F*dc

61
62

You might also like