CvSU Vision CvSU Mission

The premier University in Cavite State University shall provide

historic Cavite recognized for excellent, equitable and relevant
excellence in the development Republic of the Philippines educational opportunities in the arts,
sciences and technology through quality
of globally competitive and
morally upright individuals. CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY instruction and responsive research and
development activities.
SILANG CAMPUS It shall produce professional,
skilled and morally upright individuals for
Biga I, Silang, Cavite global competitiveness
046 513-5706 046 513-3965
[email protected]

TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Science Investigatory Project

By:

CHAPTER 1
 INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

"I realized that plastic had become part of my life and that it had become invisible to

me." Craig Leeson is an award-winning journalist and director of The Plastic Ocean. This

quotation provides us with insights into how we normalize using plastics in the modern world.

According to an article by betterfuturefactory.com, the versatility of plastic has led to a

staggering global production of over 300 million tons of plastic every year. In daily life, the

benefits of plastic are undeniable. Its durability and lightweight nature make it essential for

packaging, preserving food, and securing the safety of medical supplies. Humans currently

produce more than 350 million metric tons of plastic waste per year. Without changes to

current policies, global plastic waste generation is projected to triple by 2060, to a staggering

one billion metric tons. In contrast, if new measures and policies are introduced, such as

increased taxes on plastic use and a vastly improved global recycling system, this figure

could drop to less than 700 million metric tons. (Alves, 2024)

The phrase "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle" dates back to the USA in 1976 and became a

staple of the sustainability movement. But in 2019 459,746,020 tons of plastics were

produced which is 751% of relative change compared in 1976 which had 54,000,000 tons

only (Geyer et al. 2017 ;(OECD 2022). This statistical significance entails that the reduce,

reuse, recycle movement is not effective and there is overproduction of plastics that leads to

Solid Waste Problems. Recycling plastic has been marketed as a solution to the waste

problem by plastic-producing companies. This excuses corporations to not only produce

more plastic but also maintain a steady supply for incineration. (Guevara, 2022)

Meanwhile, the Philippines is considered the third-largest contributor to plastic waste

worldwide, contributing to an estimated 0.75 million metric tons of ocean plastic every year.
Dubbed as the “sachet economy,” the Philippines is notorious for irresponsible trash haulers

and open dump sites that cause the plastic to spill into the seas. (Guevarra, 2022)

Remulla said solid waste management is the number one problem of Cavite when it

comes to the environment, as he noted that an estimated 50 percent of solid waste in the

province goes to its rivers accounting for approximately 2,000 tons a day, of which 90

percent goes to Manila Bay. (DENR)

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This study aims to prove the effectiveness of Bioplastics as Sustainable Alternatives to

Single-Use Plastics and Packaging Applications. More specifically it aims to answer the

following questions.

The study will aim to address the following research questions:

1. What is the effectiveness of bioplastic as an alternative to single-use plastics and

packaging applications in terms of the following:

A. Solubility

B. Flexibility

C. Degradability

2. What is the most effective base for bioplastic?

A. Cornstarch

B. Wheat Flour/All-purpose flour

C. Gulaman

3. Is there a significant difference between the bases of bioplastic in terms of the following?
 A. Solubility

B. Flexibility

C. Degradability

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study is to prove the effectiveness of bioplastic as an alternative to

single-use plastic and packaging applications at our university and assess the feasibility and

benefits of implementing bioplastics as a sustainable alternative. By understanding the

sources, impacts, and current management practices of plastic waste, the study aims to

propose effective strategies for reducing environmental pollution and improving sustainability

on campus.

HYPOTHESIS

The researchers studied the following assumptions:

1. What is the effectiveness of bioplastic as an alternative to single-use plastics and

packaging applications in terms of the following:

A. Bioplastic will have higher solubility in water compared to conventional single-use plastics,

which makes it unsuitable for eating that requires some degree of water resistance.

B. Bioplastic will be less flexible than conventional single-use plastics due to the natural

polymers used in its production, but it will still possess enough flexibility to be a viable

alternative in many applications.

C. Bioplastic will demonstrate significantly higher degradability in natural environments

compared to conventional single-use plastics, making it a more environmentally friendly

option.

2. What is the most effective base for bioplastic?

Gelatin-based bioplastic will be the most effective among the bases tested (cornstarch,

wheat flour, gelatin) due to its favorable properties in solubility, flexibility, and degradability.

3. Is there a significant difference between the bases of bioplastic in terms of the following?

A. There is a significant difference in solubility between cornstarch, wheat flour, and gelatin-

based bioplastics, with gelatin-based bioplastics being the least soluble in water.

B. There is a significant difference in flexibility between cornstarch, wheat flour, and gelatin-

based bioplastics, with gelatin-based bioplastics being the most flexible.

C. There is a significant difference in degradability between cornstarch, wheat flour, and

gelatin-based bioplastics, with cornstarch-based bioplastics degrading the fastest in natural

environments.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This study enhances the understanding of single-use plastic waste management at

educational institutions and evaluates the potential of bioplastics as an alternative. It

provides empirical data and insights into the environmental and operational impacts of

plastic waste, contributing to the broader field of sustainable materials and waste

management practices.
FOR STUDENTS AND FACULTY. The findings will benefit students and faculty by creating

a cleaner, more sustainable campus environment. Increased awareness and engagement

with sustainability issues will foster a culture of environmental responsibility among the

university community.

FOR UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS. This study will provide university administrators

with insights to develop and implement more effective waste management and sustainability

policies, thereby reducing plastic waste on campus and promoting a greener environment.

FOR POLICYMAKERS. This study will offer valuable data to policymakers, enabling them to

craft broader environmental policies and regulations that address plastic use and waste

management in educational institutions more effectively.

FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTITIONERS. Waste management practitioners will

benefit from practical recommendations on improving waste management practices and

adopting bioplastics. This can lead to more efficient waste reduction strategies and better

overall environmental outcomes.

FOR FUTURE RESEARCHERS. The study will supply future researchers with new data and

insights, which can serve as a reference for further studies on plastic waste management

and the implementation of sustainable materials like bioplastics.

SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

This study aims to explore the issue of single-use plastic waste and the potential for

bioplastics as an alternative at our university. The analysis will focus on understanding the

sources, impacts, and management practices of plastic waste on campus, while also

assessing the feasibility and benefits of integrating bioplastics into the university's waste

management system. By collecting and analyzing data through trial, analysis, and
observations, the study intends to provide comprehensive recommendations for enhancing

sustainability initiatives related to reducing plastic waste.

However, it is critical to note the study's inherent limitations. For starters, the findings

may be limited to the specific context of the university campus and may not be generalizable

to other settings. The reliance on self-reported data from surveys and interviews may

introduce biases or inaccuracies. The study may also face constraints in accessing certain

data or information, particularly regarding current waste management practices and costs.

Additionally, implementing bioplastics on a larger scale may present logistical challenges

and require resources beyond the scope of this study. The awareness and willingness of

stakeholders to adopt bioplastics may vary, impacting the feasibility of proposed solutions.

Finally, due to time and resource constraints, the study may not address all potential factors

influencing plastic waste generation and management on campus.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Bioplastics. Plastics derived from renewable biological sources, such as plants or

microorganisms, are intended as sustainable alternatives to traditional petroleum-based

plastics.

Environmental Responsibility. The ethical obligation of individuals and organizations to act

in ways that protect and improve the natural environment, often through practices like

reducing waste, recycling, and adopting sustainable materials.

Global Plastic Production. The massive annual production of plastic materials is estimated

at over 300 million tonnes.

Incineration. The destruction of something, especially waste material, by burning.

Plastic Normalization. The phenomenon where the pervasive use of plastic becomes an

unnoticed and accepted part of daily life.

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Movement. A sustainability initiative originating in the USA in

1976 aimed at reducing waste by encouraging the reduction, reuse, and recycling of

materials.

Sachet Economy. A term describing the economic model prevalent in the Philippines,

where small, single-use plastic sachets are widely used, leading to significant plastic waste

and environmental pollution.

Solid Waste Management. The processes involved in collecting, treating, and disposing of

solid waste materials.

Sustainability. The practice of meeting present needs without compromising the ability of

future generations to meet theirs, emphasizes environmental preservation, resource

efficiency, and waste reduction.

 CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

This chapter is composed of the review of all the related literature and studies that

the researchers will scrutinize to give light to their study.

STARCH-BASED BIOPLASTICS

According to Ozdamar & Ates (2018), biodegradable plastics are derived from renewable

basic resources (Stevens, 2002). Stevens divided biodegradable plastics into three groups in

the same study: (a) bioplastics made of conventional polymers like starch; (b) bioplastics

made from polymers produced by microbial fermentation; and (c) bioplastics made from

polymerized resins with naturally occurring monomers like lactic acids.

Starch is a natural polymer occurring in plants. Starch is mainly comprised of two types of

molecules: linear amylose and branched amylopectin. The amylose/amylopectin ratio of

starch significantly impacts the structure and thermal stability of its bioplastics (Ghasemlou

et al. 2022). The mechanical strength of the starch generally depends on its amylose

content. In general, high-amylose starch has better mechanical properties. However, the

extrusion of high-amylose starch is challenging due to its greater gelatinization temperature

and viscosity. Starch has long been considered the best candidate for making bioplastics

due to its abundant natural availability, low cost, renewability, and biodegradability. However,

starch-based bioplastics are opaque or semitransparent (Ghasemlou, Daver, Ivanova,

Murdoch, & Adhikari, 2020). Moreover, pure starch-based bioplastics are too brittle and

fragile and almost impossible to extrude. Plasticization of starch is a common way to reduce

its brittleness, increase flexibility, and allow processability. Plasticizers such as glycerol,

glycol, and sorbitol are usually added to the starch to plasticize it and form thermoplastic

starch (TPS) (Rao, Naidu, & Tiwari, 2022). TPS is the marketable form of starch-based

bioplastics, contributing to half of global bioplastics. TPS often yields bioplastics with great
sensitivity to moisture and poor mechanical and thermal properties. Therefore, bioplastics

industries often blend TPS with other biodegradable polyester such as PBAT, polyvinyl

alcohol (PVOH), PLA, and PCL to improve its unsatisfactory water uptake and weak

mechanical characteristics. Bioplastics made from cellulose, chitin and chitosan, with similar

structures to starch-based bioplastics, have also been proposed as potential candidates in

the market; however, the high cost or poor availability of biomass resources and/or complex

biosynthesis from agricultural biomass are major barriers to their large-scale deployment in

the food sector.

The raw elements needed to make bioplastics are readily available, renewable, naturally

occurring, and biodegradable (Scotts, 2002, as referenced in Gadhave, et al., 2018). Three

suitable raw ingredients can be used to create a bioplastic: cellulose, which is typically found

in all plants; lignin, which is naturally found in woods; and starch, which is prevalent in most

root crops.

Based on its affordability and accessibility, starch is a renewable resource that shows

promise for application in bioplastics (Kaith et al., 2009, quoted in Arikan & Bilgen, 2019).

Starch is the second-largest biomass produced on Earth ever. According to Jane (1995, as

referenced in Shrirakshaya et al., 2020), it is an organic compound that is white and granular

and produced by all green plants. From starch and its derivatives, a wide range of biomass

and raw materials are generated economically, such as banana peels, corn, wheat, peas,

potatoes, and cassava roots.

Global production of starch has been estimated between 88.1 and 97.7 million tons in

2020. Of this total, 75% comes from corn, followed by cassava (14%), wheat (7%), and

potatoes (4%). China and the United States are the main producers, mainly from corn.

Thailand is the main producer of cassava starch and Europe of wheat and potato starches.

Hydrolyzed starches are the most consumed, followed by native and modified starches, and
these are important as a food source. Paper industry has the highest consumption of starch,

followed by chemical industries and biodegradable plastics, a rapidly growing market.

GRACILARIA (GULAMAN)

According to Caces-Borja (2019) Gracilaria confervoides (gulaman dagat) is the species

most extensively used in agar manufacture in the Manila area. Gracilaria is our main source

of agar-agar or gulaman. The value of agar lies in its strongly hydrophilic colloid and high gel

strength qualities. It is used where bulk is wanted, or where a suspending, stabilizing,

thickening, or gelling agent is desired. It is used in some bakery and dairy products and in

candy, jelly, canned foods, and other items. Its most important service to mankind, however,

is as a bacteriological culture medium, although the amount used for this purpose is

relatively small. In the fresh state, this is used for food in the form of salad and also as

supplemental food for the bañgos chanos. Quite recently, Gracilaria became a big export

item in our economy. Japan especially was our biggest importer of the product, so a need for

the development of the industry, especially keeping up a constant supply through its culture,

is in order.

ADVANTAGES OF BIOPLASTIC

The main benefits of bioplastics are outlined in this section based on research by

Sarkingobir, Y., & Lawal, A. A. Bioplastics: Their advantages and concerns published in

2021.

a. Ecofriendly

Traditional plastics are made from resources derived from oil. The environmental

impact of exploring and using oil-based resources to make plastics is high. In

contrast, bioplastics are typically derived from renewable resources, which lower

environmental pollution.
b. Biodegradable

In a matter of months, bacteria can readily break down bioplastics into end

products including water, carbon dioxide, methane, biomass, and inorganic

chemicals, sparing the environment from the pollution that conventional plastics

cause. Certain bioplastics are strong and take a few years to break down entirely.

Because the byproducts naturally occur in the ecosystem, this feature does not

pose a threat to the environment.

c. Compostable

Microbes can decompose bioplastics under controlled circumstances in a lab, an

industrial setting, or a home composting facility. One type of biodegradable

plastic that is utilized in single-use packaging is Parable, or PLA.

d. Recyclability

Bioplastics can be mechanically recycled through a process of collection,

cleaning, shredding, and re-extruding into new forms like pellets or fibers for

manufacturing new products. This recycling method minimizes waste and

conserves natural resources by reusing materials, supporting a circular economy.

However, the efficiency of mechanical recycling depends on the type of

bioplastic, the presence of additives, and the effectiveness of recycling

infrastructure.

e. Reduced Reliance on Fossil Fuel

Oil is on a path to depletion, highlighting the urgent need to find alternative

sources for plastic manufacturing. Renewable plant sources offer a promising

solution, providing sustainable raw materials that can be used to produce

bioplastics. Transitioning to plant-based plastics not only addresses the

impending scarcity of oil but also promotes environmental sustainability by

reducing reliance on fossil fuels and lowering the carbon footprint associated with

plastic production.
DISADVANTAGES OF BIOPLASTIC

As stated in Bioplastics: Pros and Cons, and the Future of Bioplastics by B. Hardman

(2024, May 15). Some of the drawbacks of bioplastic are as follows:

a. Costly to Create

The technology related to the bioplastics sector isn't cheap because the industry

is relatively new. Industrial composters are needed to break down bioplastics into

soil at the end of their life, and specialized manufacturing processors and

facilities are needed to produce bioplastics. The production cost of bioplastic is

estimated to be two to three times higher than that of conventional PET or PE

plastic.

b. Lack of Infrastructure to Deal with Bioplastics

Many nations lack the facilities necessary to handle bioplastics at this time due to

the high cost of the necessary equipment. If material, including bioplastic, can’t

be recycled and processed properly, it usually means that it’ll end up in a landfill.

If this is the case, then it’s not too much better than a non-biodegradable type of

plastic.

c. Competition with Food Crops

The cultivation of feedstock crops for bioplastics could potentially compete with

food production, raising concerns about food security and land use conflicts. This

is partially the reason why in recent years efforts have been focused on finding

alternative feedstocks for bioplastics production.

 CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the research methodology employed to evaluate the potential of
bioplastics as sustainable alternatives to single-use plastics, particularly within the context of
packaging at the university. The materials used, procedures followed, and data analysis
methods are discussed to assess their viability.

RESEARCH DESIGN
The research design employed in this study is experimental to allow precise control
over variables and enable the researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships. This
design is used to systematically investigate the effects of different bioplastic formulations
while minimizing bias within each variable.

Methodology:

Materials and Equipment Used:

1. Starch: Wheat flour and cornstarch
2. Gulaman
3. Glycerin
4. Vinegar
5. Household equipment/materials:
- Mixing bowls
- Spoons or spatulas for stirring
- Measuring cups and spoons
- Pots or pans for heating ingredients
- Stove or hot plate
- Molds for shaping bioplastics
- Oven
- Refrigerator

Procedures Followed:

1. Preparation of Ingredients:
● To begin the preparation of bioplastics, precise measurements of the ingredients are
essential to ensure consistent results. Start by measuring 8 tablespoons of water and
pouring it into a mixing bowl. Next, add 2 teaspoons of vinegar to the water, which
acts as a catalyst in the bioplastic formation process. Add glycerin, which is typically
 used to add flexibility to bioplastics. For the first batch of our experiment, measure 2
tablespoons of flour and combine it with the other ingredients in the bowl. Thoroughly
mix all components until a uniform consistency is achieved, ensuring that the flour is
fully dissolved and the glycerin is evenly distributed. For the second batch, repeat the
process using 2 tablespoons of cornstarch instead of flour. For the third batch, use 2
tablespoons of gelatin as the base. This mixture forms the base for the bioplastic,
which will be subjected to further processing steps to create the final product.

2. Heating and Mixing:

● Heat the mixture gently on a stove or hot plate, stirring continuously to ensure
uniform heating and mixing of the ingredients. Since we did not have a specific
temperature to follow, we carefully observed the mixture throughout the heating
process. It is crucial to monitor the mixture closely to prevent burning or overheating,
which can adversely affect the quality of the bioplastic. As we heated the mixture, we
stirred it constantly to maintain an even distribution of heat and to ensure that all
components were thoroughly blended. We continued this process until we observed
the mixture starting to thicken, indicating that it was reaching the desired consistency.
This careful and attentive approach allowed us to achieve a uniform and well-formed
bioplastic base.

3. Molding and Shaping:

● Once the mixture reaches the desired consistency, remove it from the heat source.
Pour or spoon the mixture into molds of various shapes and sizes, ensuring an even
distribution to form uniform bioplastic pieces. To allow the bioplastic mixture to cool
and solidify, we employed three different methods. First, we placed some molds at
room temperature in an open area, such as our backyard, where they were exposed
to sunlight. This method is energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, as it utilizes
natural heat, but it can be time-consuming and is dependent on weather conditions.

For the second method, we placed molds in the refrigerator. This approach
significantly speeds up the cooling process and is useful when time is a constraint.
However, the cold temperature can sometimes cause the bioplastic to become brittle,
potentially leading to cracks or fractures.

Lastly, we used an oven set to a low temperature for the third method. This technique
offers precise control over the drying process and can produce consistent results
quickly. Nonetheless, it consumes more energy and requires careful monitoring to
prevent overheating, which can degrade the bioplastic.

By comparing these methods, we observed that while sun drying is the most eco-
friendly option, it is the slowest. The refrigerator method is faster but may
compromise the structural integrity of the bioplastic. Using the oven provides a
balance of speed and control but at the cost of higher energy consumption.

4. Testing and Evaluation:

● After our bioplastics have cooled and solidified, we carefully remove them from the
molds. We then conduct tests to evaluate their physical properties, focusing on
aspects such as flexibility, strength, and biodegradability. During these evaluations,
 we record detailed observations and note any differences between bioplastics made
with different ingredients or using different procedures. This systematic approach
allows us to assess the effectiveness of our formulations and identify the optimal
conditions for producing high-quality bioplastics.

Variables and Controls:

Independent Variables:

● Type of starch used (flour, cornstarch): The type of starch used serves as an
independent variable, as it can affect the properties of the resulting bioplastic. Wheat
flour and cornstarch offer different molecular structures and properties, which can
influence factors such as texture, flexibility, strength, and biodegradability. By varying
the type of starch, the researchers can observe how these properties change and
determine the most suitable starch for specific applications.
● Addition of gulaman: The addition of gulaman as an alternative base material
introduces another independent variable. Gulaman possesses unique properties
compared to starch-based bioplastics, such as greater flexibility and elasticity. By
incorporating gulaman into the bioplastic formulation, the researchers can explore its
impact on the physical properties of the bioplastic, including texture, flexibility,
strength, and biodegradability.
● Use of glycerin: Glycerin is commonly used in bioplastic formulations to enhance
flexibility. The researchers can assess their effectiveness in achieving similar
properties to glycerin and explore any differences in bioplastic performance.

Dependent Variables:

● Physical properties of the bioplastics (solubility, flexibility, biodegradability): The

physical properties of the bioplastics, including solubility, flexibility, and
biodegradability, serve as dependent variables. These properties are influenced by
the independent variables, such as the type of starch, addition of gulaman, and use
of alternative materials. By measuring and analyzing these properties, the
researchers can evaluate the performance of different bioplastic formulations and
determine their suitability for various applications.

Controls:

● Consistent measurements of ingredients: To ensure consistency and reproducibility

in the experiments, the researchers maintain precise measurements of ingredients
for each bioplastic formulation. This control minimizes variability between samples
and allows for accurate comparisons.
● Standardized mixing and heating procedures: Standardized procedures for mixing
and heating the bioplastic ingredients are implemented to ensure uniformity and
 consistency in the preparation process. Consistent mixing and heating conditions
help prevent variations in the properties of the bioplastics.
● Use of similar molds for shaping bioplastics: Uniform molds of similar shapes and
sizes are used for shaping the bioplastics to maintain consistency in sample
preparation. This control helps ensure that any differences observed in the physical
properties of the bioplastics are not due to variations in mold shapes or sizes.
● conditions such as temperature and humidity are kept constant where possible to
minimize external factors that could influence the properties of the bioplastics. By
controlling these variables, the researchers can isolate the effects of the independent
variables on the dependent variables and obtain reliable experimental results.
Data Presentation and Analysis:
Raw Data Presentation:
Set-up A (wheat flour)
- 8 tablespoons of water
- 2 tablespoons of wheat flour
- 2 tsp of vinegarz
- 2 tsp of glycerin

Set-up B (cornstarch)
- 8 tablespoons of water
- 2 tablespoons of cornstarch
- 2 tsp of vinegar
- 2 tsp of glycerin

Set-up C (gulaman)
- 8 tablespoons of water
- 2 tsp of vinegar
- 2 tablespoons of gulaman
- 2 tsp glycerin

Observations:

Set-up A (Wheat Flour Bioplastic):

1. Appearance: The bioplastic made from wheat flour appears opaque and slightly
off-white in color.
2. Texture: It has a relatively smooth texture, similar to traditional plastic.
3. Flexibility: Depending on the specific recipe and processing method, wheat flour
bioplastic can exhibit varying degrees of flexibility, ranging from relatively stiff to somewhat
flexible.
4. Strength: It tends to have moderate strength, capable of holding its shape but may
not withstand heavy loads or excessive bending.
5. Odor: It might have a subtle odor resembling cooked grains or dough, especially
when freshly prepared.

Set-up B (Cornstarch Bioplastic):

1. Appearance: Cornstarch bioplastic typically appears translucent or semi-
translucent, with a pale yellowish hue.
2. Texture: It has a smoother texture compared to wheat flour bioplastic, often feeling
slightly slick or slippery to the touch.
3. Flexibility: Cornstarch bioplastic can vary in flexibility, with some formulations
being quite flexible while others may be more rigid.
 4. Strength: Similar to wheat flour bioplastic, cornstarch bioplastic tends to have
moderate strength, suitable for various lightweight applications.
5. Odor: It may have a faint sour odor, especially when freshly prepared.

Set-up C (Gulaman Bioplastic):

1. Appearance: Gulaman bioplastic appears translucent and gel-like, with a shiny
surface.
2. Texture: It has a soft and flexible texture, similar to gulaman desserts or gummy
candies.
3. Flexibility: Gulaman bioplastic is typically very flexible and elastic, capable of
stretching and bending easily.
4. Strength: While gulaman bioplastic is flexible, it may lack the structural strength of
other bioplastics, making it more suitable for applications where rigidity is not critical.
5. Odor: It may have a slight odor, although the scent is usually mild and dissipates
with time.

Table 1: Overall Comparison of Bioplastic Properties

Set-ups Appearance Texture Flexibility Strength Odor

Wheat flour (A) Opaque, Relatively Varying Moderate, Subtle odor

slightly off- smooth, similar degrees, from capable of resembling
white to traditional relatively stiff holding its cooked grains
plastic to somewhat shape or dough,
flexible especially
when freshly
prepared

Cornstarch (B) Translucent or Smoother, Varies, from Moderate, Faint starchy

semi- slightly slick, or quite flexible to suitable for odor,
translucent, slippery to the more rigid various especially
pale yellowish touch lightweight when freshly
hue applications prepared,
dissipates over
time

Gulaman (C) Translucent Soft and Very flexible Flexible, may Slight odor,
and gel-like, flexible, similar and elastic, lack structural usually mild,
shiny surface to gelatin capable of strength and dissipates
desserts or stretching and compared to with time
gummy bending easily other
candies bioplastics

Comparative Analysis:
 Bioplastics made from different ingredients and using varied procedures exhibit

distinct properties. Bioplastics derived from wheat flour typically appear opaque and off-

white, with a relatively smooth texture. In contrast, those made from cornstarch tend to be

translucent or semi-translucent, displaying a pale yellowish hue and a smoother, slightly slick

texture. Gulaman-based bioplastics appear translucent, gel-like, and shiny, with a soft and

flexible texture reminiscent of gelatin desserts.

Regarding flexibility, wheat flour bioplastics can range from stiff to somewhat flexible,

while cornstarch bioplastics vary from flexible to rigid based on formulation. Gulaman

bioplastics excel in flexibility, being very elastic and stretchable. In terms of strength, wheat

flour, and cornstarch bioplastics exhibit moderate strength suitable for various applications,

whereas gulaman bioplastics, while flexible, may lack structural integrity.

Moreover, their biodegradability varies, with cornstarch being highly biodegradable,

wheat flour moderately so, and gulaman bioplastics degrading more slowly. Water

resistance also differs, with wheat flour and cornstarch bioplastics showing moderate

resistance, while gulaman bioplastics have poor water resistance and tend to dissolve in

water.

Considering cost and availability, wheat flour bioplastics may be more accessible and

cost-effective due to the widespread availability of wheat flour. Gulaman may be more

expensive and less readily available compared to plant-based ingredients.

These varied properties influence the suitability of bioplastics for different

applications, with considerations such as strength, flexibility, water resistance,

biodegradability, cost, and availability being crucial factors to assess. Overall, the data

analysis reveals that gulaman is highly effective in producing bioplastics with desirable

properties such as transparency, smooth texture, and high biodegradability. However, the

choice of ingredients should be carefully considered based on the specific requirements of

the intended application, taking into account factors such as flexibility, strength, water

resistance, cost, and availability.

Trend Identification:
 ● In reviewing the data collected from our experiments, several trends emerge,

providing valuable insights into the effectiveness of specific ingredients or

procedures in producing desired bioplastic properties. One significant trend is

the influence of the base material on the appearance and texture of the

bioplastics. Bioplastics crafted from wheat flour typically showcase an opaque

appearance and a relatively smooth texture, akin to traditional plastic.

Conversely, those derived from cornstarch tend to appear translucent or

semi-translucent, accompanied by a smoother, slightly slick texture.

Gulaman-based bioplastics, in contrast, present a translucent, gel-like

appearance with a soft and flexible texture reminiscent of gulaman desserts.

Another discernible trend is the impact of the base material on flexibility and strength.

Wheat flour bioplastics can exhibit varying degrees of flexibility, spanning from stiff to

somewhat flexible, contingent upon the specific recipe and processing method employed.

Similarly, gulaman bioplastics demonstrate variability in flexibility, with certain formulations

being highly flexible while others may lean towards rigidity. However, gulaman bioplastics

consistently showcase high flexibility and elasticity, rendering them suitable for applications

requiring stretchability.

Furthermore, the data underscore disparities in biodegradability and water resistance

across different bioplastic formulations. Cornstarch-based bioplastics exhibit high

biodegradability alongside moderate water resistance, making them well-suited for

environmentally friendly applications. Wheat flour bioplastics demonstrate moderate levels of

biodegradability and water resistance, whereas gelatin bioplastics degrade more slowly and

manifest poor water resistance.

In addition to these trends, it's imperative to note the emergence of glycerine-based

bioplastics as a noteworthy contender in bioplastic development. Glycerine bioplastics, with

their transparent or translucent appearance and smooth, slightly tacky texture, offer an

intriguing alternative. They boast excellent flexibility, and moderate strength, and emit a faint

sweet odor reminiscent of glycerin. This trend underscores the importance of considering
glycerine as a viable base material in bioplastic formulation, particularly for applications

where transparency, flexibility, and moderate strength are desired.

Interpretation:

The trends in bioplastic characteristics that have been noticed provide important

information on the viability and efficiency of using various materials or techniques to produce

sustainable substitutes for single-use plastics. The results of our research indicate that the

physical properties of bioplastics, such as their appearance, texture, flexibility, strength,

biodegradability, and water resistance, are greatly influenced by the choice of base material.

In order to produce bioplastics with desired properties including transparency,

smooth texture, mild elasticity, and strength, wheat flour and cornstarch show promise as

basis materials. But cornstarch is unique because of its remarkable water resistance and

biodegradability, which makes it ideal for eco-friendly packaging applications where

biodegradability is essential. Flexible packaging and biomedical devices can benefit from the

unique benefits that gulaman-based bioplastics offer in terms of elasticity and flexibility.

Because of their slower rate of deterioration, they might be less appropriate for applications

requiring water resistance or quick biodegradation. However, gelatin bioplastics have

potential for specific uses where biocompatibility and flexibility are critical.

These revelations highlight how crucial it is to take into account a variety of starting

materials and processing techniques when creating bioplastics. We can enhance bioplastic

formulations to satisfy specific application requirements while advancing sustainability goals

and lowering dependency on traditional plastics by understanding the distinct qualities and

capacities of various materials.

Conclusion Drawing:

Based on the analysis of our experiments, we draw several conclusions regarding

the outcomes and implications for the research objectives of evaluating bioplastics as
sustainable alternatives to single-use plastics in packaging applications:

1. The choice of base material significantly influences the physical properties of

bioplastics, encompassing appearance, texture, flexibility, strength, biodegradability,
and water resistance. This underscores the importance of selecting appropriate
materials to achieve desired characteristics.
 2. Cornstarch emerges as a promising base material for producing bioplastics with
desirable properties such as transparency, smooth texture, high biodegradability, and
moderate water resistance. Its eco-friendly attributes make it particularly suitable for
applications in sustainable packaging.

3. Wheat flour also shows potential as a base material for bioplastics, offering similar
properties to cornstarch but with variances in appearance and texture. Further
exploration of wheat flour-based formulations could yield additional sustainable
packaging options.

4. Gulaman-based bioplastics exhibit exceptional flexibility and elasticity, yet may have
limitations in water resistance and biodegradability. While suitable for specific
applications, such as flexible packaging and biomedical devices, their use may be
restricted in certain contexts.

Overall, our findings contribute to the growing understanding of bioplastics and their
role in mitigating the environmental impact of single-use plastics. By identifying effective
materials and procedures for producing bioplastics with desirable properties, we lay the
groundwork for the development of sustainable packaging solutions aligned with principles of
environmental stewardship and circular economy principles. Further research and
development efforts are warranted to optimize bioplastic formulations and processing
methods, considering factors such as flexibility, strength, water resistance, biodegradability,
cost, and availability.

REFERENCES
Stevens, E.S. (2002) Green Plastics: An Introduction to the New Science of Biodegradable
Plastics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Sarkingobir, Y., & Lawal, A. A. (2021). Bioplastics: Their advantages and concerns. Mater.
Metallurg. Eng, 11(1), 13-18.

Ghasemlou, M., Daver, F., Murdoch, B. J., Ball, A. S., Ivanova, E. P., & Adhikari, B.
(2022). Biodegradation of novel bioplastics made of starch, polyhydroxyurethanes
and cellulose nanocrystals in soil environment. Science of the Total Environment,
815, Article 152684.

Ghasemlou, M., Daver, F., Ivanova, E. P., Murdoch, B. J., & Adhikari, B. (2020). Use of
synergistic interactions to fabricate transparent and mechanically robust nanohybrids
based on starch, non-isocyanate polyurethanes, and cellulose nanocrystals. ACS
Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12(42), 47865–47878.

Rao, L. S., Naidu, C., & Tiwari, S. (2022). Investigation on synthesis, structure and
degradability of starch based bioplastics. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49, 257–261.

Gadhave, R. V., Mahanwar, A. A., & Gadekar, P. T. (2018). Starch based bio-plastic: the
future of sustainable packaging. Open Journal of Polymer Chemistry, 8(2), 21-33. doi:
10.4236/ojpchem.2018.82003

Arikan, E., & Bilgen, H.D. (2019) Production of Bioplastic from potato peel waste and

investigation of its Biodegradability.

Shirakshaya, S.S., Vignesh, M., Dhananandhini, M., Kavya, N., & Poongothai M. (2020).

Cellulose and Starch as the Source of Bioplasitc.

Le, V. (2020). Bio-plastics production from starch. Retrieved from

https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/335541/Van_Le.pdf?sequence=2

Caces-Borja, P. (2019). The seaweed industry of the Philippines.

Hardman, B., & Hardman, B. (2024, May 15). Bioplastics: Pros & Cons and are they

the Future? Green Living Blog | All About Nature Friendly Sustainable Lifestyle
Options. https://www.greenlivingblog.org.uk/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-

bioplastics/

Alves, B. (2024, January 10). Topic: Global plastic waste. Statista.

https://www.statista.com/topics/5401/global-plastic-waste/#topicOverview

DENR proposes sanitary landfill in Cavite to solve garbage problem. (n.d.).

https://www.denr.gov.ph/index.php/news-events/press-releases/2948-denr-proposes-

sanitary-landfill-in-cavite-to-solve-garbage-problem

Environment, U. (n.d.). Plastic pollution. UNEP.

https://www.unep.org/plastic-pollution

Guevarra, S. (2022, July 18). The face of plastic | news | Ateneo de Manila

University. Ateneo De Manila. https://www.ateneo.edu/news/2022/07/18/face-plastic

Ritchie, H., Samborska, V., & Roser, M. (2023, December 28). Plastic pollution. Our

World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution#:~:text=In%201950%2C

%20the%20world%20produced,produces%20over%20450%20million%20tonnes.

Vilpoux, O. F., & Silveira, J. F. S. (2023). Global production and use of starch. In

Elsevier eBooks (pp. 43–66). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-90058-

4.00014-1