Personality Development
Personality Development
personality factors
Thus, development is understood as the result of the bidirectional confluence
between more biological or internal factors (genetic inheritance) and other
contextual or external factors (environment). The former includes temperament,
which is defined by an intrinsic and innate emotional and motivational disposition
that mobilizes the subject for primary interests.
On the other hand, environmental factors can be classified into common influences
(externally originated norms, values, social and cultural beliefs) and personal
influences (particular life experiences and circumstances of each subject, such as
an illness).
It can be said, therefore, that as the subject matures biologically and incorporates
new experiences and external experiences, the process of developing one's own
personality takes place. How does this personality development occur during
childhood?
At the same time, attachment generates a context in which children can learn and
explore their environment feeling safe, which is essential to discover their own
capabilities. These kinds of discoveries will shape their attitudes and a part of their
personality, depending on whether they feel more or less competent in the areas in
which they normally live.
With the consolidation of the symbolic function, at 2 years of age, one is able to
internalize the permanence of the object, even if it is not physically visible, which
makes the consolidation of the emotional bond possible. Subsequently, the child
begins a stage characterized by a constant search for approval and affection from
the adult, experiencing a certain emotional dependence and once again showing a
good predisposition for general social interaction.
Finally, between 4 and 6 years old, the child's interest focuses on his or her
relationship with peers, which strengthens the beginning of the socialization stage
in environments other than the family, such as school.
This is a delicate process, since in addition to the fact that the child can be very
difficult to handle, it requires that the adult set strict and clear educational
guidelines on the appropriate developmental path to take. This is one of the
fundamental ideas to highlight in relation to the development of the boy or girl's
autonomy.
Thus, it is a process by
which what others express
and what one interprets
from their actions forms an
image of oneself. In turn,
this image is associated
with a moral evaluation of it,
which makes it more or less
positive depending on the expectations and preferences of the boy or girl.
It is very relevant that there is not a very high discrepancy between the real self
(what the individual represents) and the ideal self (what the individual would like to
represent) to consolidate an adaptive and adequate or balanced psychic and
emotional development).
Another fundamental aspect is the role that external evaluations play on the level
of self-esteem that each subject presents. Thus, the image that others have of
oneself and the assessment they make of their skills or behaviors significantly
influence the child's perception of themselves.
From the third or fourth year onwards, the search for approval from the adult would
be related to this issue, since this motivation is carried out with the ultimate goal of
establishing an acceptable level of self-esteem. As mentioned above, at this stage
conflicts may arise, at the level of the child's oppositional behavior towards
educational figures and other adults, derived from the contrast between the adult's
protection and the child's search for autonomy. Therefore, a fundamental aspect to
take into account is the educational style that the parents exercise on the child.
An educational style characterized by a
balanced combination of
control/discipline/authority and
affection/understanding seems to foster
a high level of self-esteem and, in
addition, a lower probability of tantrums
and oppositional behavior. In this way, it
is essential that educators understand
the importance of the child's
progressive increase in autonomy and
that as his or her maturation as a
human being takes place, the exhaustive control of all decisions related to the child
must be gradually reduced.
That is to say, both temperament and character are elements that form personality
by interacting together. They cannot be isolated individually, but they help to
understand our behavioral patterns globally and in all areas of life.
Another prominent author and one of the pioneers in proposing that personality
develops from birth to death was Erik Erikson, who considered that the
development of the psychic configuration and personality are derived from the
social nature of the human being or, in other words, otherwise to social interaction.
For this author, each life stage involves a series of conflicts and problems that the
individual has to face until they are able to overcome them, growing and
strengthening their self as they are overcome and forging the way of seeing,
thinking and acting in the world of life. each subject.
ETHICAL CONDUCT
Ethics studies human behavior, its norms,
duties and rights related to the society in
which it occurs, and indicates what
"should" or "should not" be done in a given
society.
Ethical behavior is that which society accepts as "correct" or "good" with reference
to the current moral code.
Now, social responsibility is the obligation of the company to carry out actions that
serve both its interests and the society affected by its activities. In other words, it
can be said that it is the serious consideration of the impact on society of the
company's actions.
Regarding the social responsibility of the organization, there are two points of view:
the classic one, which indicates that the only social responsibility of the
administration is to maximize the company's profits; and the socioeconomic, which
maintains that the social responsibility of the administration goes beyond the
achievement of profits, to seek protection and improve the well-being of society in
general.
Ethics is the branch of knowledge that deals with the study of the moral actions of
individuals and groups, as well as the rules and norms that govern this behavior in
a given society.
Therefore, professional ethics is the part of ethics that governs the behavior of the
individual in his or her professional practice. Without a doubt we are facing one of
the most diversified branches of ethics. For example, for business administrators,
there is no basic code of ethics. Therefore, it is up to companies to define their own
codes of conduct.
Therefore, Codes of Conduct are rules dictated, in most cases, unilaterally by
companies whose application is generally not subject to external verification
processes.
1.- Concept of Code of Ethics.
To achieve greater specialization in the field of action of ethics, Codes of Ethics are
used, which are nothing more than a compilation of the norms and rules that
determine the ideal or most appropriate behavior for a specific group of
professionals. The rules of this code may be written (as in medicine or law) or
implicit.
A code is a formal statement of principles that define standards of specific behavior
for a company. In general, it does not contain all the implicit norms of professional
behavior, because it is understood that every person who reaches a professional
level has certain training and criteria of what should or should not be done during
their performance as a professional.
It is not easy to establish the concept of what is or is not ethical. Indeed:
Ethics goes beyond current laws. That is, certain activities may be
considered legal but not ethical. For example, child labor may be legal in
some part of the world (I wish it wasn't) but this practice is undoubtedly bad
for society. Therefore, acting in accordance with the law and established
regulations is only one part of ethical behavior. Ethics goes further...
The subjectivity of ethics. Its variation from one society to another. Each
society or group judges different activities and processes in a different way
based on their cultural values, particular interests, specific circumstances
and influence of the environment, which usually gives rise to various
controversies about what is and is not ethical. For example, a company may
consider that it is not unethical to relocate production to countries with lower
salary levels. It is true that they benefit shareholders (who receive greater
economic benefits), distributors (who have more competitive prices),
customers (because they have a better offer) and their employees (because
they have greater job stability and/or better salaries. of the receiving
country) and to the society of the receiving country by raising its standard of
living; But perhaps unions or some associations in the country of origin do
not think the same and accuse this company of being "unethical" because it
generates unemployment in the country of origin and because it directly or
indirectly generates or promotes exploitation in second or third world
countries. pay less than in the country of origin.
Questions involving ethics are often ambiguous. There are and will be
situations in which some may consider activities inappropriate or unethical
while others may consider them acceptable. It could even be the case that
the same activity could be considered ethical at one time and unethical at
another time. Therefore, it is recommended that companies have Codes of
Ethics in order to make known which practices the company considers
acceptable and those that are not, in order to reduce the issuance of
ambiguous judgments to a minimum.
2.- Company codes of conduct.
Sectoral self-regulation.
In close relationship with the principle
of transparency and as a vehicle for
expressing CSR policies, we have
company codes, which, as indicated,
are set by the company unilaterally.
More and more companies are
formulating their own code. From the
point of view of employees and managers it is key since, upon becoming part of
the company, they accept the moral commitment to assume said code in their
professional conduct. We are faced with a message that is sent to society in the
sense of expressing the company's commitment to assuming certain
responsibilities.
The term "self-regulation" is generally used as the antonym of "regulation", placing
the discourse then in the generic contrast between voluntariness and normativity.
This self-regulation can be understood as an individual company, but also as a
sector or territorial one.
Without a doubt, companies need them to correct the negative impacts generated
by the development of their activity and that are issued to influence the practices of
their global business partners, and as a way of informing consumers about the
principles that They continue in the production of the goods and services that they
manufacture or sell.
We are faced with very relevant instruments for the promotion of human, labor and
environmental rights, as well as measures against corruption, especially in those
countries in which public authorities do not apply minimum standards.
But this rapid development of codes, as a CSR tool, can be perceived as a
dangerous trend towards the privatization of social rights. Thus, for example, they
can only complement, and not replace, national or international legislation, social
dialogue or collective bargaining.
The key is whether this mechanism is sufficient to correct market defects and the
global economy.
Without a doubt, companies that import products from countries with little
protection of human rights will tend to adopt codes to avoid criticism, especially if
their sales depend largely on the image of the brand and the good will of the
consumer. In addition to the foreseeable positive impact on corporate reputation,
the adoption and implementation of codes of conduct can provide other business
benefits, such as an improvement in the relationship with partners, the promotion
of good corporate governance and legal compliance in the countries of operation. ,
and an improvement in quality and productivity as a result of a better work
environment.
3.- Demand from society.
First World society demands that there be
standards of behavior, that there be codes,
that commitments be made whose
commitments are, in some way, palpable and
measurable.
One way to facilitate this, encouraged by the European Commission, is, for
example, the adhesion of companies to codes of conduct defined by international
organizations. Let's look at his words: "The Commission considers it necessary
that the codes of conduct:
The value and strength of a code will depend on its credibility and transparency.
And both are a function of the degree to which the company's workers, unions,
business partners and suppliers, consumers and other stakeholders are aware of: