Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views24 pages

Introduction of OB Unit 1

Uploaded by

suryansh singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views24 pages

Introduction of OB Unit 1

Uploaded by

suryansh singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Unit-1

Organisational Behaviour

INTRODUCTION
Everything you need to know about organizational behaviour. The field of
organisational behaviour deals with human behavior in organization.
It is the multidisciplinary field that seeks knowledge of behaviour in
organisational settings by objective based on studying individual, group and
oganisational processes.
The role and field of organisation behaviour is not only concerned with
a particular organisation. The concepts and approaches of organisation
behaviour are also more concerned with the society.

According to L. M. Prasad, “Organisational behaviour can be defined as the


study and application of knowledge about human behaviour related to other
elements of an organisation such as structure, technology and social
systems.”

In words of K Aswathappa, “OB is the study of human behaviour in


organisational setting, of the interface between human behaviour and
organisation and of the organisation itself.”

In words of Stephen P. Robbins, “OB is a field of study that investigates the


impact that individuals, groups and structures have on behaviour within
organisations for the purpose of applying such knowledge towards
improving an organisation’s effectiveness.”

According to L. M. Prasad, “Organisational behaviour can be defined as the


study and application of knowledge about human behaviour related to other
elements of an organisation such as structure, technology and social
systems.”

According to Davis and Newstram, “Organisational behaviour is the study


and application of knowledge about how people act within organisations.”

1
According to Fred Luthans, “Behaviour is directly concerned with the
understanding, prediction and control of human behaviour in
organisations.”

In words of John Newstram and Keith Devis, “Organisational behaviour is


the study and application of knowledge about how people as individuals
and as groups act within organisations. It strives to identify ways in which
people can act more effectively.”

OB is the study of individual behaviour in isolation, when in group and as a


part of an organisation. The study of individual behaviour only, would be
incomplete because behaviour is affected by the people surrounding us as
well as by the organisation, in which we work. Studying only individuals or
only organisations would be of no use. It is essential to study both
simultaneously.

Personality, perception, learning, attitude, family background, training,


motivation, job satisfaction, performance appraisal, leadership
effectiveness, norms, values and ethics are the factors which affect the
individual behaviour. Group dynamics, communication, organisational
environment, individual and organisational culture affect group behaviour.
Organisational structure, power & politics, status, relation with juniors &
seniors, conflicts and culture affect the individual behaviour in the
organisation.

Advantages of Organizational Behavior

1. Good Workplace Relationships


It is hard to build meaningful workplace relationships. As a leader, you
have to look out for any instances of conflict. Or situations that can hamper
employee relationships.
Figuring out the real issues that harm employee relationships might be a
daunting job. But it is essential to do that.

2
Organizational behavior is essential to assist a leader in solving the issues.
It helps you in-

The main objective is to improve communication among people. On top of


that, it reduces any chances of misunderstanding that can harm
relationMotivation is a crucial element when we talk about employee
engagement. Without motivation, it is difficult to improve productivity. A
lack of motivation is why your people don’t give their 100% effort to the
job. Tackling such an issue will require the study of organizational
behavior.
It gives a clear understanding of the issues. After which, you can quickly
act on it and resolve them for greater efficiency.

3. Builds a Psychologically Safe Workplace


Organizational behavior study helps a leader to understand their influence
on the employees. It determines your attitude towards them. It draws a clear
picture of how to make your workplace psychologically safe. This is a
workplace that will inspire and build morale.
A psychologically safe workplace helps the employees in-Recognize that
you can examine differences by studying behavior. This allows a manager
to build a workplace where employees feel at home and work without any
hiccups.

4. Nature of Employees
Achieving success in the long term can be a difficult task. And maintaining
consistency is even more significantly challenging.
However, it will all depend on how employees behave at work. Their
attitude towards their work will reflect on the results.
The employees need to be passionate and enthusiastic about their work.
And if they are laid back regarding their work, then it poses as a roadblock.

3
To understand the impact of it, the study of behavior is critical. It helps a
manager in deducing-
The factors can be varying. However, if the nature of the employees does
not change over time, it can hinder growth. This can result in an
organization getting derailed from the path of success.

5. Higher Efficiency in Teams


The study of behavior in an organization is vital for team collaboration. It
gives you insights into the similarities and differences that people share.
Understanding the dynamics will assist a leader in facilitating better team
unity. A team with good chemistry will-
In return, it builds good morale and confidence among team members.
Thus, increasing team bonding which is crucial in meeting the company
objectives. As a result, leaders can achieve greater success in the long term.
ships.

Historical Development of Organisational Behaviour - Organisational


Behaviour
In 1776, Adam Smith advocated a new form of organisational structure
based on the division of labour. One hundred years later, German
Sociologist Max Weber introduced the concept about rational organisations
and initiated the concept of charismatic leadership.
Though the origin to the study of Organisational Behaviour can trace its
roots back to Max Weber and earlier organisational studies, it is generally
considered to have begun as an academic discipline with the advent of
scientific management in the 1890's, with Taylorism representing the peak
of the movement. Thus, it was Fredrick Winslow Taylor who introduced the
systematic use of goal setting and rewards to motivate employees that could
be considered as the starting of the academic discipline of Organisational
Behaviour.

4
Proponents of scientific management held that rationalising the organisation
with precise sets of instructions and time-motion studies would lead to
increased productivity. Studies of different compensation systems were also
carried out to motivate workers.
In 1920's Elton Mayo an Australian born Harvard Professor and his
colleagues conducted productivity studies at Western Electric's Hawthorne
Plant. With this epoch making study the focus of organisational studies
shifted to analysis of how human factors and psychology affected
organisations. This shift of focus in the study of organisations was called
the Hawthorne Effect. The Human Relations Movement focused on teams,
motivation, and the actualisation of goals of individuals within
organisations. Studies conducted by prominent scholars like Chester
Barnard, Henri Fayol, Mary Parker Follett, Frederick Herzberg, Abraham
Mas low, David Mc Cellan and Victor Vroom contributed to the growth of
Organisational Behaviour as a discipline.
In the 1960's and 1970's, the field was strongly influenced by social
psychology and the emphasis in academic study was quantitative research.
An explosion of the orising, bounded rationality, informal organisation,
contingency theory, resource dependence, institution theory and population
ecology theories have contributed to the study of organisational behaviour.

Historical development of Organisational behaviour


Various Historical Concepts
1. Industrial Revolution: It has only been since the Industrial
Revolution of the nineteenth century that relatively large number of
individuals have been required to work together in manager-
subordinate relationships. Prior to this many of the large organisations
that did exist, were military ones in which the authority of the leader
was supreme and practically unquestioned, since membership was not
voluntary.
Behavioural problems were relatively easy to deal with under these
conditions. It is certainly no accident that much of our current
knowledge about human behavior has been derived from
organisations in which influencing behaviour consists of more than
just giving orders.

5
Famous industrialist like William C Durant, Henry Ford, Andrew
Carnegie, and John D Rock feller were men of brilliant managerial
qualities. They possessed the managerial qualities necessary for the
initial stages if industrialization. However, when the industrial
revolution began to mature and become stabilized, this approach was
no longer appropriate.
2. Scientific Management: The great industrialist was primarily
concerned with overall managerial organisation in order for their
companies to survive and prosper. The scientific management
movement around the turn of the century took an arrower, operations
perspective. Yet, the two approaches were certainly not contradictory.
The managers in both cases applied the scientific method to their
problems and they thought that effective management at all levels was
the key to organisational success.
Fredrick W Taylor(1856 - 1915) is the recognized father of scientific
management.
Taylor started scientific management in his time-and-motion studies at
the Midvale Steel Company in the early 1900's. As an industrial
engineer, he was concerned within efficiencies in manual labour jobs
and believed that by scientifically studying the specific motions that
made up the total job, a more rational, objective and effective method
of performing the job could be determined. In his early years as a
foreman in the steel industry, he saw different workers doing the same
job in different ways. It was his opinion that each man could not be
doing his job in the optimal way, and he set out to find the "one best
way" to perform the job efficiently. His argument proved to be correct
and in some instances "taylorism" resulted in productivity increases of
400 percent. In almost all cases, his methods improved productivity
over existing levels.
Taylor had actually shop and engineering experience and therefore
was intimately involved with tools, products and various machining
and manufacturing operations. His well- known metal -cutting
experiments demonstrated the scientific management approach. Over
a period of twenty-six years, Taylor tested every conceivable variation
in speed, feed,d epth of cut, and kind of cutting tool. The outcome of

6
this experimentation was high speed steel, considered one of the most
significant contributions to the development of large-scale production.
Coupled with Taylor's logical, rational, engineering -like approach to
management was a simple theory of human behaviour: people are
primarily motivated by economic rewards and well take direction if
offered the opportunity to better their economic positions. Put simply,
taylor's theory stated that:
o Physical work could be scientifically studied to determine the
optimal method of performing a job.
o Workers could there after be made more efficient by being given
prescriptions for how they were to do their jobs.
o Workers would be willing to adhere to these prescriptions if paid
on "differential piece work" basis.
In addition to advocating the use of scientific means to develop the
best way to do a task, Taylor argued that several other principles were
important.
iv. Workers with appropriate abilities had to be selected and trained
in the appropriate task method.
v. Supervisors needed to build cooperation among the workers to
ensure that they followed the designated method of work.
Building such cooperation included soliciting workers'
suggestions and being willing to discuss ideas for improved
work methods.
vi. There needed to be a clear division of work responsibilities.
Previously, the workers planned how to approach a task, and
then they executed it. Under the Taylor scheme, it was
management's job to do the task planning, using scientific
methods.
Taylor's four principles of scientific management are summarized
here: -
o Scientifically study each part of a task and develop the best
method for performing the task.
o Carefully select workers and train them to perform the task by
using the scientifically developed method.
o Cooperate fully with workers to ensure that they use the proper
method.
7
o Divide work and responsibility so that management is
responsible for planning work methods using scientific
principles and workers are responsible for executing the work
accordingly.
Many have criticized Taylor's work for dehumanizing the work place
and treating workers like machines, but his overall contribution to
management was significant. Although others were studying similar
methods at the same general time, Taylor was one of the first totake
the theory and practice of management out of the realm of intuitive
judgment and into the realm of scientific inquiry and reasoning.
Taylor's ideas on time study, standardization of work practices, goal
setting, money as a motivator, scientific selection of workers and rest
pauses have all proved to be successful techniques of management
today. Taylor was by no means the only note worthy scientific
manager. Others in the movement, such as Frank and Lillian Gilberth
and Henry L Gantt made especially significant contributions.
The Gilbreths: Other major advocates of scientific management were
the husband and wife team of Frank Gilbreth (1868 - 1924) and
Lillian Moller Gilberth (1878 - 1972). As Frank become involved in
training young brick layers, he noticed the in efficiencies that were
handed down from experienced workers. To remedy the situation he
proposedusing motion studies to streamline the bricklaying process.
Frank also designed special scaffolding for different types of jobs and
devised precise directions for mortar consistency.
On the basis of these and other ideas, Frank was able to reduce the
motions involved in brick laying from 18 ½ to 4. Using his approach,
workers increased the number of bricks laid per day from 1000 to
2700 with no increase in physical exertion.
Frank married Lillian Moller, who began working with him on
projects while she completed her doctorate in psychology. The two
continued their studies aimed at eliminating unnecessary motions and
expanded their interests to exploring ways of reducing task fatigue.
Part of their work involved the is olation of 17 basic motions, each
called atherblig ("Gilbreth" spelled backward, with the "t" and "h"
reversed). Therbligs included such motions as select, position, and
hold - motions that were used to study tasks in a number of industries.
8
The Gilbreths used the therblig concept to study tasks in a number of
industries. The Gilbreths used the therblig concept to study jobs and
also pioneered the use of motion picture technology in studying jobs.
Lillian's doctoral thesis was published as a book, The Psychology of
Management, making it one of the early works applying the findings
of psychology to the workplace. At the insistence of the publisher, the
author was lilted as L.M. Gilbreth to disguise the fact that the book
was written by a woman.
Lillian helped define scientific management by arguing that scientific
studies of management must focus on both analysis and synthesis.
With analysis, a task is broken down into its essential parts or
elements. With synthesis, the task is reconstituted to include only
those elements necessary for efficient work. She also had a particular
interest in the human implications of scientific management, arguing
that the purpose of scientific management is to help people reach their
maximum potential by developing their skills and abilities. Lillian
Gilbreth ranks as the first woman to gain prominence as a major
contributor to the development of management as a science.
Henry L Gantt (1861-1919): One of Taylor's closest associates,
Henry Gantt latter become an independent consultant and made
several contributions of his own. The most well -known is the Gantt
Chart, a graphic aid to planning, scheduling and control that is still in
use today. He also devised a unique pay incentive system that not only
paid workers extra for reaching standard in the allotted time but also
awarded bonuses to supervisors when workers reached standard. He
wanted to encourage supervisors to coach workers who were having
difficulties.
The scientific managers like Taylor, Frank and Lillian Gilberth and
Henry Gantt were not the first or only group that recognized the
importance of the operating functions. Ahundred years earlier, Adam
Smith had carefully pointed out the advantages of division of labour
and in 1832, Charles Babbage, a British mathematician with some
asto unding managerial insights, discussed transference of skill in his
book Economy of Machinery and Manufacture.
The Human Relations Movement: The second major step on the way to
current organisational behaviour theory was the Human Relations
9
Movement that began in the 1930's and continued in various forms until the
1950's. The practice of management, which places heavy emphasis on
employee cooperation and morale, might be classified as human relations.
Raymond Mills states that the human relation approach was simply to "treat
people as human beings (instead of machines in the productive process),
acknowledge their needs to belong and to feel important by listening to and
heeding their complaints where possible and by involving them in certain
decisions concerning working conditions and other matters, then morale
would surely improve and workers would cooperate with management in
achieving good production".
The Human Relations Movement, popularized by Elton Mayo and his
famous Hawthorne studies conducted at the Hawthorne Plant of the
Western Electric Company, in many ways it remained the foundation of
much of our management thinking today. Before the Hawthorne studies
officially started, Elton Mayo headed a research team, which was
investigating the causes of very high turnover in the mule-spinning
department of a Philadelphia textile mill in 1923 and 1924. After
interviewing and consulting the workers, the team set up a series of rest
pauses, which resulted in greatly reduced turnover and more positive
worker attitudes and morale.

The fundamental Principles of organizational behavior are;

 Individual Differences.
 Perception.
 A Whole Person.
 Motivated Behavior.
 The desire for Involvement.
 The value of the Person.
 Human Dignity.
 Organizations are Social System.
 Mutuality of Interest.
 Holistic Concept.

10
Individual Differences

Every individual in the world is different from others.


Science supports this idea. Each person is different from all others,
probably in a million ways, just as each’s DNA profile is different.
The idea of the individual difference comes originally from psychology.
From the day of birth, each person is unique, and personal experiences after
birth tend to make people even more different.

Perception
Peoples’ perceptions are also different when they see an object. Two people
can differently present the same object. And this is occurring for their
experiences.
A person always organizes and interprets what he sees according to his
lifetime of experience and accumulated value.
Employees also see work differently for differ in their personalities, needs,
demographics factors, past experiences, and social surroundings.

A Whole Person
An employee’s personal life is not detached from his working life.
As an example, A women who attend the office at 9:00 AM is always
anxious for her children’s school time (if her kids can participate in the
school or not).
As a result, its impact falls on her concentration that means her working
life.
For this reason, we cannot separate it. So the manager should treat an
employee as a whole person.

Motivated Behavior
An employee has so many needs inside him.
So, they want to fulfill those needs. That’s why; they had to perform well in
the organization.
Some motivations are necessary to enrich the quality of work. A path
toward increased need fulfillment is the better way to enhances the quality
of work.

11
Desire for Involvement
Every employee is actively seeking opportunities to work to involve in
decision-making problems. They hunger for the chance to share what they
know and to learn from the experience.
So, the organization should provide them a chance to express their opinions,
ideas, and suggestions for the decision-making problem.
A meaningful involvement can bring mutual benefit to both parties.

Value of the Person

An employee wants to be treated separately from another factor of


production, (land, capital, labor).

They refuse to accept the old idea that they are just treated as economic
tools because they are the best creation of Almighty Allah.

For this, reason, they want to be treated with carrying respect, dignity and
other things from their employers and society.

Human Dignity

This concept is very philosophical. Every person needs to be treated with


dignity and respect, whether it’s the CEO of the company or labor.
It confirms that people are to be treated differently from other factors of
production because they are of a higher order in the universe.
it recognizes human dignity because people are of a higher order; they want
to be treated with respect and dignity and should be treated this way.

Organizations are Social System

From sociology, we learn that organizations are social systems;


consequently, activities therein are governed by social laws as well as
psychological laws. Just as people have psychological needs, they also have
social roles and status.

Their behavior is influenced by their group as well as by their drives.

12
In fact, two types of social systems exist side by side in organizations. One
is a formal system, and the other is the informal social system.

Mutuality of Interest

Mutual interest is represented by the statement that organizations need


people and people also need organizations.
Organizations have a human purpose. They are formed and maintained by
some mutuality of interest among their participants.
People see organizations as a means to help them reach their goals, while at
the same time,

Holistic Concept

When the fundamental concepts of OB are placed together, a holistic


concept emerges.
This concept interprets people-organization relationships regarding the
whole person, the whole group, whole organization, and the whole social
system.
It takes across the board view of people in organizations to understand as
many as possible of the factors that influence their behavior.
Issues are analyzed in terms of the total situation affecting them rather than
in terms of an isolated event or problems.

Important Disciplines in the Organizational Behaviour Field


There are some important disciplines in the organizational behaviour field
that have developed it extensively. Due to the increase in organizational
complexity, different types of knowledge are required and helped in many
ways.

13
Contributing Disciplines in the Organizational Behaviour Field are: –
1. Psychology;
2. Social Psychology;
3. Sociology;
4. Anthropology;
5. Political Sciences; and
6. Economics.
Explanation
1.Psychology: – The word psychology comes from the Greek word
‘psyche’ which means spirit. Psychology is the science that attempts to
measure, explain and sometimes change the behaviour of human beings.
Modern psychology is almost universally defined as the science of
behaviour that is almost identical to the science of behaviour in general.

14
Psychology has a great influence on the field of organizational behaviour.
Psychology deals with individual behaviour.

Psychology studies the behaviour of different people in different situations


like normal, abnormal, social, industrial legal, childhood, adolescence, old
age etc. It also studies the processes of human behaviour, such as learning,
motivation, perception, individual and group decision-making –
organization, group process, satisfaction, communication, selection, and
pattern-making of influence in training.
It is a science, which describes the change of behavior of human and other
animals. It is concerned with the more study of human behavior.
Understanding Psychological principles and its models help significantly in
gaining the knowledge of determinants of individual behavior such as: –
1. Learning;
2. Personality;
3. Perception;
4. Individual decision-making;
5. Performance appraised;
6. Attitude measurement;
7. Employee selected;
8. Work design;
9. Motivation;
10.Emotions;
11.Work strain; and
12.Job satisfaction.

2.Social Psychology: – Social psychology is that part of psychology that


integrates the concepts of psychology and sociology. In other words, social
psychology studies all aspects of social behaviour and social thought – how
people think about and interact with others. It deals with how people are
affected by other individuals who are physically present or who are
imagined to be present or even whose presence is implied. One of the areas
that has attracted considerable attention from social psychology is the
change in legislation to reduce its resistance and implement it successfully.

15
Additionally, social psychology is useful in the areas of measuring and
understanding changing attitudes; communication patterns; The ways in
which group activities can satisfy individual needs and group decision-
making processes. It focuses on the effect people have on each other. It is a
field within psychology that blends concepts from psychology and
sociology and that focuses on the impact of people on each other.
The major contributions of social psychology to OB are as follows: –
1. Behavior change
2. Attitude change
3. Communication
4. Group process
5. Group decision-making

3.Sociology: – Sociology is the study of group behaviour. It can be


described as an academic discipline that uses the scientific method to
accumulate knowledge about the social behaviour of an individual. In other
words, it studies the behaviour of people in relation to their fellow human
beings.
Some of the areas within the OB that have received valuable input from
sociologists include group dynamics, organizational culture, formal
organization theory and structure, organizational technology, bureaucracy,
communication power, conflict, and inter-group behaviour. As for
managerial practice, its contributions are mainly in the areas of
bureaucracy, role structure, social system theory, group dynamics, impact
of industrialization on social behaviour, etc.
Sociological concepts, theories, models, and techniques help significantly to
understand better the group dynamics, organizational culture, formal
organization theory and structure, corporate technology, bureaucracy,
communications, power, conflict, and intergroup behavior.
Most sociologists today identify the discipline by using one of the three
statements, key concepts of Sociology are: –
1. Sociology deals with human interaction arid this communication are the
key influencing factor among people in social settings;

16
2. Sociology is a study of plural behavior. Two or more interacting
individuals constitute a plurality pattern of behavior; and
3. Sociology is the systematic study of social systems.

4.Anthropology: – The word anthropology combines the Greek word


‘anthropo’ meaning man and the noun ending ‘logi’ meaning science. Thus,
anthropology can be defined as the science of man. The main aim of
anthropology is to acquire a better understanding of the relationship
between the human being and the environment. Adaptations to surroundings
constitute culture. The manner in which people view their surroundings is a
part of the culture. It is also known as the ‘Science of Humanity’ which
covers a wide range of studies including the evolutionary history of humans
and the characteristics of different societies, cultures and human groups.

In other words, the field of anthropology studies the relationship between


individuals and their environment. Groups of individuals living together
form a set of shared ideas called a culture. Culture is rooted in a system of
symbols shared by a group of people and reflected in their language and
beliefs.
The culture of a civilization or the subculture of a defined group is
transmitted by stories and myths told by the members of the group. These
stories and myths help groups understand who they are and what things are
important.
It is the study of society to learn human beings and their activities. The
major contributions of Anthropology in the field of OB are as follows: –
1. Comparative values
2. Comparative attitudes
3. Cross-culture analysis
4. Organization environment
5. Organization culture

5.Political Science: – Political science is the branch of social science that


deals with politics in its theory and practice and with the analysis of various
political systems and political practices. Political scientists study the
17
behaviour of individuals and groups in the political environment.
Contributions of political scientists are significant to the understanding of
behavior in organizations. Political scientists study the behavior of
individuals and groups within a political environment.
They contribute to understanding the dynamics of power centers,
structuring of conflict and conflict resolution tactics, allocation of power
and how people manipulate power for individual self-interest.
Specific topics of concern to political scientists include conflict resolution,
group alliances, the allocation of power, and how people manipulate power
for personal gain. In other words, political science helps us understand the
dynamics of power and politics within organizations, as there is usually
a hierarchical structure of different organizational levels of managers and
subordinates.
It is the study of the behavior of individuals and group within or political
environment. The main contribution of political science in the field of OB
have been concerned with: –
1. Conflict
2. Intra-organizational policies
3. Power
In a business field, organizations wanted to attain supremacy in their field
and indulge in politicking activities to gain maximum advantages by
following certain tasks like Machiavellianism, coalition formation,
malpractices, etc. The knowledge of political science can be utilized in the
study the behavior of employees, executives at micro as well as macro
level.
6.Economics: – Economists study the distribution, consumption and
production of goods and services. Economics contributes to the behaviour
of the organization by designing structure. The organization and its
structure are influenced by transaction cost economics. The cost factor that
exchanges the market is known as transaction cost economics. It identifies
the extent to which the structure and size of the organization varies as a
result of efforts to avoid market failures by reducing production and
transaction costs within the limits of human and environmental factors.

18
Economic pressures determine the appropriate structure through either
market, hybrids network structure or hierarchy to organize transactions
effectively. A firm can be unselected from the market if possible, failing to
settle in the best possible way. Environments are dynamic, organization
must respond to change its structure. Shifts from large firm hierarchies to
networks or to market relations are in terms of changing conditions of the
economising function. Labour market dynamics, productivity, human
resource planning and forecasting, and cost-benefit analysis are the
common interests shared by economist.
So we can assume that there are various types of disciplines in
organizational behaviour. They, directly and indirectly, influence the
overall activities of OB

Approaches to Organizational Behavior


1. Human resources approach.
2. Contingency approach.
3. Productivity approach.
4. Systems approach.
Human Resources Approach
This approach recognizes the fact that people are the central resource in any
organization and that they should be developed towards higher levels of
competency, creativity, and fulfillment.
People thus contribute to the success of the organization.
The human resources approach is also called as the supportive approach in
the sense that the manager’s role changes from control of employee to
active support of their growth and performance.
The supportive approach contrasts with the traditional management
approach.
In the traditional approach, managers decided what employees should do
and closely monitored their performance to ensure task accomplishment.
In the human resources approach, the role of managers changes from
structuring and controlling to supporting.

19
Contingency Approach
The contingency approach (sometimes called the situational approach) is
based on the premise that methods or behaviors which work effectively in
One situation fail in another.
For example; Organization Development (OD) programs, way work
brilliantly in one situation but fail miserably in another situation.
Results differ because situations differ, the manager’s task, therefore, is to
identify which method will, in a particular situation, under particular
circumstances, and at a particular time, best contribute to the attainment of
organization’s goals.
The strength of the contingency approach lies in the fact it encourages
analysis of each situation prior to action while at the same time discourages
the habitual practice of universal assumptions about methods and people.
The contingency approach is also more interdisciplinary, more system –
oriented and more research-oriented titan any other approach.
Productivity Approach
Productivity which is the ratio of output to input is a measure of an
organization’s effectiveness. It also reveals the manager’s efficiency in
optimizing resource utilization.
The higher the numerical value of this ratio, the greater the efficiency.
Productivity is generally measured in terms of economic inputs and outputs,
but human and social inputs and outputs also are important.
For example, if better organizational behavior can improve job satisfaction,
a human output or benefit occurs.
In the same manner, when employee development programs lead to better
citizens in a community, a valuable social output occurs.
Organizational behavior decisions typically involve human, social, and/or
economic issues, and so productivity usually a significant part of these
decisions is recognized and discusses extensively in the literature on OB.
Systems Approach
The Systems Approach to OB views the organization as a united,
purposeful system composed of interrelated parts.
This approach gives managers a way of looking at the organization as a
whole, whole, person, whole group, and the whole social system.
In so doing, the systems approach tells us that the activity of any segment of
an organization affects, in varying degrees the activity of every other
20
segment. A systems view should be the concern of every person in an
organization.
The clerk at a service counter, the machinist, and the manager all work with
the people and thereby influence the behavioral quality of life in an
organization and its inputs.
Managers, however, tend to have a larger responsibility, because they are
the ones who make the majority are people oriented.
The role of managers, then, is to use organizational behavior to help build
an organizational culture in which talents are utilized and further developed,
people are motivated, teams become productive, organizations achieve their
goals and society reaps the reward.
Inter-Disciplinary Approach
Organizational behavior is an integration of all other social sciences and
disciplines such as psychology, sociology, organizational theories etc.

Challenges and Opportunities of Organizational Behavior

1.Enhancing Quality And Productivity


Maintaining the quality of its products is a challenging task for every
organisation. It is the driving force through which companies are able to
attract more & more customers & hold them for the long term.
Quality is simply the degree to which products are able to satisfy the
customer’s needs & wants. It is the main factor which affects the customer
satisfaction level. Better quality products more easily satisfy customer
needs & wants.
Every organisation should focus on quality factor to increase its customer
base. The main dimensions covered under the quality factors are Features,
Reliability, Durability, Performance, Conformance with standards,
Responses & Reputation.
Managers are focusing more & more to meet the quality expectations of
customers. In order to improve quality & productivity, they are even
engaging programs like Total Quality Management (TQM) &

21
Reengineering. These two techniques mainly focus on customer needs &
continuously make efforts to increase the customer satisfaction level. These
techniques too involve extensive employee involvement in order to increase
productivity.
2.Working With People In Different Cultures
Every organisation has employees who differ from each other in terms of
race, culture, religion, gender, and ethnicity. Employing person with distinct
cultures help organisations in getting fresh & new talents and potentialities.
Maintaining peace & cooperation among its different employees is a
challenging task for every organisation.
Every employee working in an organisation wants to retain their own values
& cultures although they are working in the same company where they need
to follow some rules & regulations.
Same decision of organisation may be welcomed & accepted by people of
one culture & opposed by people from another culture. Therefore managers
need to treat every employee differently as per their individual differences
in order to ensure cooperation & increase productivity.
3.Improving The Skills Of People
Skills of people need to improved & upgraded as per the requirements from
time to time. In the business area, there are always lots of changes which
occur at a faster rate in terms of technology, environment & structure.
These changes need to be addressed in order to achieve efficiency &
increase productivity. Employees & other executives of the organisation
should possess the required skills in order to easily adapt to these changes.
Failure to adopt these changes will make it difficult to achieve targeted
goals timely. There are basically 2 sets of employee skills that are technical
& managerial skills. Managers should, therefore, focus on designing a
proper performance appraisal program consisting of various training &
development programmes for their employees. This will help them in
improving their skills.

22
4.Empowering People
Empowerment of employees is another challenging task for every
organisation. Productivity of employees generally gets reduced when kept
under stringent rules & regulations as compared when they are allotted
some freedom.
Delegating appropriate responsibility & power to employees at different
level is important & challenging task for managers. Employees should be
allowed & encouraged to participate in various work-related decisions. This
will improve employer-employee relations in the organisation & also the
commitment of employees to work.
5.Stimulating Innovation And Change
Today every business needs to focus on innovative ideas in order to bring
changes to beat the tough competition in the market. Business should
always focus to differentiate their product from their competitor’s product.
It will help them in getting more & more customers.
Business will fail & eventually forced to shut down if unable to keep
flexibility as per market demand. It should always bring innovative
products & services to market with minimum cost. For example, MI is
presently beating the tough competition in the market by presenting a wide
range of innovative products at a minimised cost,
6.Dealing With Globalisation
Today globalisation of business is something that is increasing worldwide at
a great pace. Now the operations of the business are not limited to one
particular location or nation, but they are performed internationally.
Business nowadays are conducted beyond the national boundary of one
country & have their presence in different countries of the world.
Products of companies are selling more by various online portals over the
internet rather than by their physical outlets. Faster transportation &
communication network have an efficient role in providing services to
customers via online portals.

23
Online presence of companies becomes the most emerging requirement of
every business. For example, Amazon conducts the majority of its business
operations worldwide via its internet portals rather its physical outlets.
7.Improving Ethical Behaviour
Better ethical behaviour in working culture is a must for an organisation to
increase its productivity. It should always be ensured that employees
behave positively & abide by all rules & regulations of the organisation.
Healthy working environment for employees with minimal ambiguity
should be created.
This will help in increasing their productivity & reducing conflicts. Clear
cut instruction should be given regarding what is right behaviour & what is
wrong. All unethical practices like the use of insider information for
personal gains should be avoided. Managers should organise various
workshops, seminars & training programmes in order to improve ethical
behaviour of employees.
8.Improving Customer Service
Business is unsuccessful if it fails to treat its customer well & provide them
with better service. If businesses have a large number of satisfied customers
it will help it in enjoying large profits in the long run.
They need to develop a better understanding with their customers to easily
recognise their needs & wants. Employees should meet with customers in
the most friendly manner & try to address their problem properly.
It will help the management in creating the customer-responsive
environment in business. Organisational behaviour has a key role in
establishing a better understanding of employees & ultimately with
customers.
************************************************************

24

You might also like