Evaluation Rubric: GROUP DISCUSSION BASED CASE ANALYSIS
1. CONTENT
Parameters Mark Excellent (80%-100%) Good (60% to Fair (40% to Poor (0 to 40%)
s 80%) 60%)
Identification of 2 Identifies & understands Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and
the all of the main issues in Understands Understands understands few of the
Main the case study most of the main some of the issues in case study
Issues/Problems issues in the issues in the case
Analysis of the 5 Insightful and thorough Thorough analysis study
Superficial Incomplete analysis of
case study
Issues analysis of all the issues of most of the analysis of the issues
issues some of the
Comments on 10 Well documented, Appropriate, well issues in the
Superficial Little or no action
effective Reasoned and pedagogically Thought out case
and/or suggested, and/or
solutions/strategi appropriate comments on comments about inappropriate inappropriate solutions to
es solutions, or proposals solutions, or solutions to all of the issues in the
(The solution may for solutions, to all some of the
be in the case proposals for issues case study
issues in the case study
already or solutions, to in the case study
proposed by you) most of the
issues in the case
study
Links to Course 3 Excellent research into Good research and Limited research Incomplete research and
Readings and the issues with clearly Documented and Links to any readings
Additional documented links to links to the Documented
Research class(and/or outside) material read links to any
readings
readings
2. GROUP DISCUSSION
Marks Parameters
8-10 1. Student is a proactive participant showing a balance between listening,
initiating, and focusing discussion.
2. Displays a proactive use of the whole range of discussion skills to keep
discussion going and to involve everyone in the group.
3. Understands the purpose of the discussion and keeps the discussion focused
and on topic. Applies logics, knowledge, confidence, showing leadership and
sensitivity.
6-8 1. Student is an active participant showing a balance between listening, initiating,
and focusing discussion.
2. Demonstrates all the elements of discussion skills but uses them less
frequently and with less Confidence than the above level.
3. Keeps the discussion going but more as a supporter than a leader. Tries to
involve everyone in the group.
4. Demonstrates logic and knowledge but lacks the confidence to pursue them so
that the group takes longer than necessary to reach consensus.
5. Demonstrates a positive approach but is more focused on getting done than on
having a positive discussion.
4-6 1. Student is an active listener but defers easily to others and tends not pursue
personal point of view, lacking confidence.
2. Limits discussion skills to asking questions, summarizing and staying on topic.
3. Rarely demonstrates analysis skills and logics because doesn’t understand the
purpose of the discussion, and as a result, offers little evidence to support any
point of view.
2-4 1. Student shows effort and is willing to be involved in the discussion but lacks
the skills to get involved.
2. Asks clarifying questions as the main discussion skill.
3. Passively tries to find resources e.g. flipping through notes.
4. Lacks participation, logics resulting in little evidence with which to assess
skills.
0-2 1. Student demonstrates no participation or effort.
2. Participates only when prompted by the teacher. Only responds to others and
initiates nothing.
3. Provides limited responses that are often off topic.
4. Participates minimally so that it is impossible to assess analysis skills or
understanding of the issues.
