Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views28 pages

Slidesaver - App Ksnvts

Ethics

Uploaded by

shabaw048
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views28 pages

Slidesaver - App Ksnvts

Ethics

Uploaded by

shabaw048
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28
UNIT 3: THE ETHICAL DIMENSION OF HUMAN EXISTENCE i —— OBJECTIVES Objectives 1. identify the ethical aspect of human life and the scope of ethical thinking; define and explain the 2. terms that are relevant to ethical thinking; and 3. define and explain the terms that are relevant to ethical thinking; and 4. evaluate the difficulties that are involved in maintaining certain commonly-held notions on ethics. = | INTRODUCTION «In August 2007, newspapers reported what seemed to be et another sad incident of Trateratty violence. Cris nthony Mendez, a twenty-year-old student ofthe . University of the Philippines (UP), was rushed to the hospital in the eafly morning hours, unconscious, with large bruises on his chest, back, and legs. He passed away that morning, _ and the subsequent autopsy report strongly suggests that his hysical injuries were most pie ably the result of "hazing" fine term colloquially used to refer to initiation rites in which neopryies may be subjected to various forms of physical abuse). ss" —“‘C *What exactly happened remains an open uestion, as none of those who were with him that night came forward to shed light on what had transpired. Needless to say, none of them came forward to assume responsibility for the death of Cris. Even as the leaders of the Sigma Rho fraternity publicly denounce. o—_— INTRODUCTION + Even as the leaders of the Sigma Rho fraternity publicly denounced the death of Cris, those members of theirs who had been with him that night vanished, avoiding and refusing to cooperate with legal authorities. Meanwhile, UP students and the general public clamored for justice. In a move that surprised the student body, the UP chancellor called on all fraternities to justify their continued existence. Meanwhile, the case of the tragic death of Cris Anthony Mendez was left unresolved. It remains that way up to this day? = | »Lastly: No one knows just what exactly happened. No charges have been filed, no definitive testimony has been forthcoming. But there is more to this for us than just a criminal mystery. oo — REFLECTION . Pondering on the death of Cris, we may find ourselves asking questions such as: + What is the value of one’s life?” + "What exactly were thee wrongs done to Cris by his so-called fraternity brothers?” + “Is there any good to fraternities?” These questions that concern good and bad, or right and wrong-and these are questions concerning value-are the kind of questions that we deal with in ethics. = | ETHICS IS ABOUT... *The good thing to be done and the bad thing to be avoided. «The right and wrong thing to do. *What consists an acceptable or unacceptable human behaviour. *Determining the grounds of human values. Etiquette Technique Aesthetics & Technical KINDS OF VALUATION = | WHAT IS AESTHETICS? * Derived from the Greek word aesthesis (sense of feeling) «Judgements of personal approval; and disapproval that we make about what we see, hear or taste. sS——""——‘_ StS WHAT IS ETIQUETTE? *Concerned with right and wrong actions but those which are not quite grave enough to belong to discussion on ethics. — _—_7 WHAT IS TECHNIQUE AND TECHNICAL? *Technique and Technical-came from the Greek word techne.-Technical Valuation means right and wrong technique of doing things. = | KINDS OF VALUATION * Aesthetic valuation — good or bad in art and beauty. * Etiquette valuation — polite and impolite behaviour. * Technical valuation — the right and wrong way or method of doing things. oO ETHICS AND MORAL * Morals * Refer to specific beliefs and attitudes that people have or to describe acts that people perform. + Example: + Moral judgement and Moral Reasoning * Ethics * Discipline of studying and understanding ideal human behavior and ideal ways of thinking. + Example: + Professional Ethics a DESCRIPTIVE AND NORMATIVE STUDY + Reports how people make their moral a ‘ valuations without making any y= Sg riptive judgements either for or against these valuations. + Prescribes what we ought to maintain as our standards or bases for moral Normative valuation. a ISSUE, DECISION, JUDGEMENT AND DILEMMA _ + Situations that call for moral valuation + Particular situations that are often the source of considerable and inclusive debates _+ Involves choosing what act one will perform a ISSUE, DECISION, JUDGEMENT AND DILEMMA + Act f making an assessment on the actions or behavior of someone * Complicated situation wherein one is torn between choosing one of two goods or choosing between the lesser of two evils + Involves choosing what act one will perform OO Principles Moral theory Framework - PLATO-CREDITED AS ONE OF THE PIONEERS OF PHILOSOPHY THE APOLOGY OF SOCRATES Written by Plato whereas in this book Socrates makes the claim that it is the greatest good for a person to spend time thinking about and \.. discussing with others —_— SOURCES OF AUTHORITY * One's guide to ethical behavior . Refers to different rules and regulations that are posited or put forward by an authority or figure and requires compliance —_— ; SS" _ SOURCES OF AUTHORITY + Foundation for ethical values; The Divinity called called God, Allah or supreme Being commands and one is obliged to obey her culture. —_— SOURCES OF AUTHORITY + Refers to the "way of life” + What is ethically acceptable or unacceptable is relative to or dependent on one’s culture. SS | _ JAMES RACHELS feet elt) eM te) lil James Rachels The Challenge of Cultural Relativism Argument for and Implications of Cecio) —_—_ CULTURAL RELATIVISM + James Rachels-he presents some of the difficulties related with cultural relativism namely: * The argument of cultural relativism is premised on the reality of difference, + Under cultural relativism, we are in no position to render any kind of judgment on the practices of another culture + Under cultural relativism, we realize that we are in no position to render judgment on the practices of even our own culture + We can maintain cultural relativism only by following the presumption of culture as a single, clearly defined substances or as something fixed and already determined. + recognition that the individual thinking person is at the heart of all moral valuations. al loyafte- eter * theory that describes the underlying dynamic behind all human actions. Ethical E * prescribes that we should make our own ends and interests as. the single overriding concern. Plates’ Republic-a response to the assertion that one should only care CRETE SONI gee tte ag Ui ee “The Republic” Reeser @ whereas he answered F the question ) regarding justice any - Fe L reedtobejug” Glaucon-provides restatement of =— the case for egoism by way of a myth. Socrates-one of the

You might also like