Engagement Engagement

Empid Gender score before score after Salary Dept

training training
3 Female 3.25 3.86 30095.46 HR
13 Male 3.1 3.83 32181.95 HR
16 Male 3.14 3.67 35371.45 HR
17 Male 3.18 3.71 31326.83 HR
19 Male 3.16 3.59 30050.44 HR
22 Male 3.26 3.82 36456.65 HR
23 Female 3.63 3.66 34411.11 HR
26 Male 3.17 3.52 37180.35 HR
29 Male 3.72 3.66 31496.53 HR
33 Female 3.88 3.8 30041.73 HR
35 Female 3.08 3.67 32653.27 HR
37 Male 3.75 3.83 34336.99 HR
39 Female 3.75 3.86 30951.82 HR
46 Female 3.73 3.78 30212.48 HR
51 Male 3.67 3.52 44407.14 HR
52 Female 3.28 3.58 39200.09 HR
54 Female 3.6 3.77 33334 HR
55 Female 3.65 3.69 39690.17 HR
59 Female 3.09 3.75 34562.49 HR
60 Male 3.16 3.76 35495.45 HR
What is absolute difference in averages of engagement scores before training and after training?
If Salary is normally distributed then 90% of the employee will be expected to earn below
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The engagement score before training is not significantly less than engagement scor
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Leptokurtic distribution has fat tails.
The p value for testing alternate hypothesis that In Finance department, average salary of female employees is lower than ave
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The engagement score before training is right skewed for female employees.
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The ANOVA design for comparing means across different departments is:
IQR for employee engagement score after training is:
The error degrees of freedom for testing the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in mean differences of enga
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Which of the following department has the least p value for testing hypothesis that
What is the least salary of the top 10 percent of highest paid employees?
What is the probability that a employee selected is an female employee in the finance department earning more than 36000?
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The management is thinking introducing variable pay structure if average salary of m
If salary is assumed to be normally distributed then 60% of employees would earn more than Rs./-salary.
The F value for testing the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in mean salaries of three dapartments is:
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The p-value for testing the hypothesis that Average salary of an employee is significa
What is the average salary of finance department?
Given that a male employee is working in the marketing department, what is the probability that he earns more than 45000?
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Which of the following department has highest dispersion in salary?
The model mean square value for testing the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in mean differences of enga
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The absolute difference in average engagement score before and after training is mo
Select Any One Of the Following Options: All the tests of normality will always agree with each other.
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Which of the following is unit free measure of dispersion?
If salary is assumed to be normally distributed then proportion of employees earning less than 40000 is: (Enter your answer in
Select Any One Of the Following Options: It is possible to comment on skewness of the distribution using boxplot.
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The dispersion in male salaries is more than in female salaries.
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The data for salary is normally distributed according to Shapiro-Wilks Test.
Select Any One Of the Following Options: There is a significance difference in salaries of Marketing and HR department. (Hint:-
The p value for testing alternate hypothesis that In HR department, an average salary of Male is signitcantly greater than fema
The lower 95 percent confidence limit for mean difference between mean engagement score after training and engagement s
The ratio of variances of male salary to female salary is:
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Mesokurtic distribution has skewness of 0.
Absolute T-value for testing the hypothesis that Engagement score before training is significantly less than engagement score
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The length of upper whisker in Box plot is always (Q3 +1.5*IQR)
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Which department has shown most positive effect of training on employee engagem
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Which of the following will not aid visual inspection of normality?
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The salaries in finance department has more variation than in marketing departmen
The Sum of square error value for testing the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in mean differences of enga
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The level of significance denotes maximum permissible type 1 error.
Select Any One Of the Following Options: What is the department of a person earning highest salary among least paid 10 perc
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Which of the following department has least average engagement score before train
The value for upper limit of 90% confidence interval for mean salary of marketing department is:
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Is the proportion of Female employees significantly greater than 40 percent?
Select Any One Of the Following Options: You wish to introduce training program if average engagement score before training
Select Any One Of the Following Options: Is there any association between gender of an employee and department
Absolute T-value for testing the hypothesis that Engagement score after training is significantly better than engagement score
If salary is assumed to be normally distributed then proportion of employees earning more than 35000 is: (Enter your answer
Select Any One Of the Following Options: There is a significance difference in average engagement score before training and a
The upper 95% confidence limit of mean difference between engagement score after training and engagement score before tr
Select Any One Of the Following Options: You will continue with the soft skill training for employees only if the average engage
 0.219500000000002 0.219
43385.64
FALSE
TRUE
0.0326
FALSE
BALANCED ANOVA DESIGN
0.202
57
HR
44887.500
0.05
NO
35080.163
3.359
FALSE
36777.179
0.3
Marketing
0.107
Yes
NO
Cov
0.744
YES
YES
NO
yes
0.218
0.034
3.03623067252901
YES NO
5.75039561233508
NO
HR
Line Chart
FALSE
4.915
YES
Finance 30196.42
HR
40714.147
NO
NO
no chi sq=1
 4.7475604743912
0.606
YES
0.296
YES
Descriptives

N 60

Missing 0

Mean 0.219

Median 0.16 T VALUE 5.750396

Standard
0.295
deviation
Minimum -0.34

Maximum 0.8

P VALUE 7.003217E-05 t value 4.74756

Df 19

3 Female 3.25 3.86 30095.46 HR

13 Male 3.1 3.83 32181.95 HR
16 Male 3.14 3.67 35371.45 HR
17 Male 3.18 3.71 31326.83 HR
19 Male 3.16 3.59 30050.44 HR
22 Male 3.26 3.82 36456.65 HR
23 Female 3.63 3.66 34411.11 HR
26 Male 3.17 3.52 37180.35 HR
29 Male 3.72 3.66 31496.53 HR
33 Female 3.88 3.8 30041.73 HR
35 Female 3.08 3.67 32653.27 HR
37 Male 3.75 3.83 34336.99 HR
39 Female 3.75 3.86 30951.82 HR
46 Female 3.73 3.78 30212.48 HR
51 Male 3.67 3.52 44407.14 HR
52 Female 3.28 3.58 39200.09 HR
54 Female 3.6 3.77 33334 HR
55 Female 3.65 3.69 39690.17 HR
59 Female 3.09 3.75 34562.49 HR
60 Male 3.16 3.76 35495.45 HR
20
1 Female 3.25 3.86 30095.46 HR 0.61
 3.5045 pre
3.724 post

0.2195abs diff
Normal Distribution
Input values

Parameters 'Compute quantile(s)'

Mean =
p = 0.9
36451.047
cumulative
SD = 5411.092
mode

Results

Quantile

x1

43385.64
H0 BEFORE>=AFTER
H1 BEFORE<AFTER

Paired Samples T-Test

Paired Samples T-Test

statistic df

Engagement Engagement
score before score after Student's t -5.766 59
training training

Note. Hₐ μ Measure 1 - Measure 2 < 0

BEFORE IS SIGN LESS

ANSWER - FALSE
 p

1.5744092E-07
ACCEPT ALTERNATE
LEPTO HAS FAT TAILS

TRUE
h0
H1 IN FINANCE DEPT, AV FEMALE SALARY<AVG MALE SALARY

ANSWER- 0.0326

Independent Samples T-Test

Independent Samples T-Test

Statistic df p

Salary Student's t -1.964 18 0.0325641778

Note. Hₐ μ Female < μ Male

Assumptions

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk)

W p

Salary 0.967 0.6838225525

Note. A low p-value suggests a violation of the assumption of normality

Homogeneity of Variances Test (Levene's)

F df df2 p

Salary 4.391 1 18 0.0505371038

Note. A low p-value suggests a violation of the assumption of equal variances

 FALSE
IT IS LEFT SKEWED

Descriptives

Gender Engagement score before training

N Female 30

Male 30

Missing Female 0

Male 0

Mean Female 3.519

Male 3.49

Median Female 3.595

Male 3.49

Standard deviation Female 0.286

Male 0.283

Minimum Female 3.01

Male 3.06

Maximum Female 3.97

Male 3.98

Skewness Female -0.307

Male -0.022

Std. error skewness Female 0.427

Male 0.427
BALANCED ANOVA DESIGN
ACROSS DIFF DEPT.S
 0.202
Descriptives

Engagement score after training

N 60

Missing 0

Mean 3.724

Median 3.71
Standard
0.135
deviation
IQR 0.202

Minimum 3.5

Maximum 3.98

Skewness 0.311

Std. error
skewness 0.309
H0: no sig diff in mean differences of engagement scores before and after training between the three dapartments
H1:

ANOVA - F

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

Dept 0.214 2 0.107 1.242

Residuals 4.915 57 0.086

en the three dapartments

0.2965047427211
ANSWER HR
MARKETING

Paired Samples T-Test

statistic df

Engagement score
Engagement score after training before training Student's t 2.74 19

Note. Hₐ μ Measure 1 - Measure 2 > 0

HR

Paired Samples T-Test

statistic df

Engagement score
Engagement score after training Student's t 4.748 19
before training

Note. Hₐ μ Measure 1 - Measure 2 > 0

FINANCE

Paired Samples T-Test

statistic df

Engagement score
Engagement score after training before training Student's t 2.599 19

Note. Hₐ μ Measure 1 - Measure 2 > 0

df p

0.00651271777

df p

0.000070032171

df p

0.0088081623368
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The management is thinking introducing variable pay structure if average salary of m

H1 marketing<40000

One Sample T-Test

Statistic df p

Salary Student's t -1.195 19 0.1234343624258

Note. Hₐ μ < 40000

h0 true so no
structure if average salary of marketing department is significantly less than 40000. Should the variable pay structure be introduced?
structure be introduced?
Results

Quantile

x1

35080.163
ANOVA - Salary

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

Dept 182147176.241 2 91073588.12 3.359

Residuals 1545368052.536 57 27111720.22

 p

0.0417720981623
One Sample T-Test
One Sample T-Test

Statistic p

Salary Wilcoxon W 1101 0.0860358288

Note. Hₐ μ > 35000

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk)

W p

Salary 0.914 0.0004534636

Note. A low p-value suggests a violation of the assumption of normality

Descriptives

Salary

N 20

Missing 0

Mean 36777.179

Median 35494.2
Standard
5569.978
deviation
Minimum 30157.01

Maximum 48581.72
ANOVA - F

Sum of Squares df Mean Square

Overall model 0.214 2 0.107

Dept 0.214 2 0.107

Residuals 4.915 57 0.086

 F p

1.242 0.2965047427211

1.242 0.2965047427211
Descriptives

Gender Salary

N Male 30

Female 30

Missing Male 0

Female 0

Mean Male 38721.131

Female 34180.963

Median Male 37243

Female 33219.245

Variance Male 36790401.013 3.036230673

Female 12117129.751
Select Any One Of the Following Options: The length of upper whisker in Box plot is always (Q3 +1.5*IQR)