2024 L2 Alternative
2024 L2 Alternative
Review 48
M.M138463888.
This document should be used in conjunction with the corresponding learning modules in the 2024 Level 2 CFA® Program
curriculum. Some of the graphs, charts, tables, examples, and figures are copyright 2023, CFA Institute. Reproduced and
republished with permission from CFA Institute. All rights reserved.
Required disclaimer: CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant accuracy or quality of the products or services
offered by MarkMeldrum.com. CFA Institute, CFA®, and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA
Institute.
1
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
b. compare the life cycle of commodity sectors from production through trading
or consumption
c. contrast the valuation of commodities with the valuation of equities and bonds
e. analyze the relationship between spot prices and futures prices in markets in
contango and markets in backwardation
g. describe, calculate, and interpret the components of total return for a fully
collateralized commodity futures contract
M.M138463888.
2
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Commodities
3
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 3
1. Energy LOS a
1) Crude Oil – low in density & flows freely at - compare
room temperature ⇒ Light
- easier to process, yielding more valuable gasoline & diesel
- low in sulfur content ⇒ Sweet
- weather ➞ temporary impact (e.g. hurricane)
· as economies grow, oil demand increases (availability of
oil at affordable prices also facilitates growth)
extraction
· drivers of supply & demand technology
politics refining
business cycle usage
e.g./ shale oil – supply availability due to extraction technology
electric vehicles, solar – reduce demand for oil products
US & Canada – ban offshore drilling in Artic waters
1. Energy Page 4
LOS a
2) Natural Gas – can be used directly
- compare
(heavier compounds – NGLs – are also extracted
liquids
- categorized as either:
a) associated gas – coming from an oil well (a co-product of oil)
can be: - sold in spot markets
- burned off
- re-injected into the oil field to maintain
pressure (keeps extraction costs low)
b) unassociated gas – on its own (where oil is not present)
- Storage/transportation cost high ➞ need to keep gas under
M.M138463888.
pressure
- liquified natural gas (LNG) – for transport by ships
- must be cooled to -260℉
- primary demand – electric generation
cooling
- also weather dependent
heating
4
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 5
1. Energy LOS a
3) Refined products – heating oil, gasoline, - compare
jet fuel, propane, etc…
- refined products typically have a short shelf life (availability
measured in days)
- refineries typically located on major coastlines & ports
(that is where the oil is delivered)
- planned refinery maintenance ➞ switch over from summer gas
(typically low demand periods) to winter gas
Page 6
3. Industrial (base) Metals/ can be stored for years
LOS a
- mined ore that is processed into
- compare
copper, aluminum, nickel, zinc, lead, tin & iron
feeder
4. Livestock/ · hogs · cattle M.M138463888. · sheep · poultry
live
- depends on low cost inputs (feed) i.e. grains
- high grain costs lead to short-term oversupply
as herds are slaughtered (mid-term price increases)
- tied to GDP growth (especially in emerging/developing
economies)
5
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 7
4. Livestock/ LOS a
Weather – affects health & weight - compare
- winters tough for cattle, heat & humidity tough for hogs
- limits weight gain
avian flu
- disease
mad cow disease
porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv)
Page 8
6. Softs (cash crops) · cotton, coffee, sugar, LOS a
cocoa - compare
- called ‘cash crops’ since they are grown to be sold,
not consumed for subsistence
M.M138463888.
6
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 10
⇒ Energy/
LOS b
· Refineries – affect demand for crude - compare
& supply of oil products
7
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 11
⇒ Industrial/Precious Metals
LOS b
- ore & finished products can be stored - compare
for years (but storage costs, risks of ownership, financing
costs)
e.g./ Copper
Page 12
⇒ Industrial/Precious Metals
LOS b
- smelting/processing relies on economies of scale - compare
- large facilities with high utilization rates
∴ when supply > demand, difficult to cut production
- overproduction continues until smaller players
drop out
- long lead times + large costs to add extraction or processing
capacity
- monthly futures contracts with no seasonality (unlike energy)
8
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 14
⇒ Grains/ - demand for grains is year round
LOS b
- storage facilities supply year round
- compare
⇒ need to understand old crop vs. new crop
(inventory) (coming harvest)
for futures trading
⇒ Softs/ commodities in this sector differ significantly
e.g./ coffee
M.M138463888.
9
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Valuation
Page 16
estimation of
FV LOS c
future profitability
- contrast
CF CF CF TV and cash flows
PV = DCF Stocks
bonds
financial assets
no cash inflows
10
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Participants
Page 17
1) Hedgers – eliminate price risk
LOS d
- may be a registration requirement - describe
(hedgers face different margin requirements
since they make/take delivery)
5) Regulators
futures futures
price price
spot - price difference
between one
contract & another
is called the
calendar
spread
M.M138463888.
spot
Backwardation Contango
𝒕 𝒕
- bearish indicator - bullish indicator
- expected future spot - expected future spot price
price = lower = higher
Note: for commodities
11
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 19
Contango LOS e
$ (negative $ - analyze
spot
calendar
spread)
Backwardation
(positive
calendar spread)
spot
𝒕 𝒕
Trading strategy 1. Trading strategy 3.
Buy long-dated contract Sell long-dated contract
Sell short-dated contract Buy short-dated contract
speculator)
∴ such a resulting price curve would be ‘normal’
⇒ not backed by observation however:
i.e. backwardation does not generate positive returns
contango does not generate negative returns
(statistically significant that is)
12
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
- if hedging demand from producers > hedging demand from end users
then futures prices would have to be lower to induce
speculators to fill the gap ⇒ Backwardation
- if hedging demand from producers < hedging demand from end users
then the futures prices will be higher ⇒ Contango
Problem: producers tend to be more persistently exposed to
price risk than end-users/consumers
Page 22
3) Theory of Storage/
LOS f
- compare
Futures price = spot price + direct storage costs – convenience yield
M.M138463888.
13
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 24
e.g./
LOS g
- 11 Jan contracts = $110 exposure - describe
10 - rolling forward to Feb, need - calculate
12 contracts = $108 exposure - interpret
(opposite for contango)
9
Jan Feb
𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
. 9 %′𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞
− 𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 = × 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝
e.g./ 𝟏𝟎 − 𝟗
= . 𝟏 𝐨𝐫 𝟏𝟎% M.M138463888.
𝟏𝟎
14
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 25
3) Collateral Return/ yield from bonds/cash
LOS g
used to maintain the position - describe
- when calculating E(R), most indices will use S.t. T-Bills - calculate
- interpret
Notes/ price return on front month contracts typically different
from the price change of the physical commodity
contract–standardized (quality, delivery)
physical markets – not to the same degree
spot 𝚫𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬
− 𝚫𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐭
= 𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥
futures
futures spot neg. roll
no roll yield pos. roll
T T T
minimal
storage
15
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Commodity Swaps
Page 28
e.g./ oil refiner ➞ long a swap that pays the LOS i
amount exceeding $100/barrel every - describe
month for 9 months
pays $25/barrel
for the 9-month period
· called an ‘excess return swap’
M.M138463888.
overall (-9)
+ 16
16
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 29
- OTC, customizable LOS i
· Total return swap – one party receives payment based - describe
on the change in the level of an index (multiplied
by some notional amount)
Commodity Index
used as a benchmark to evaluate Page 30
⇒ Index LOS j
broader moves in commodity pricing
- describe
for macroeconomic or forecasting purposes
the basis for an investment vehicle
17
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
18
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 33
⇒ Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index/
LOS j
- uses a fixed weighting scheme - describe
- rolling a bit complicated ⇒ attempts to maximize
backwardation & minimize contango
Page 34
⇒ Rogers International Commodity Index (RICI)/ LOS j
- 37 commodities, fixed weights, selection committee - describe
- not all components are denominated in USD
- Rebalancing Frequency/
- rebalancing is more important if a market is
frequently mean reverting (more peaks to sell, more
valleys to buy)
- can lead to underperformance in a trending market
19
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
d. explain the due diligence process for both private and public equity real estate
investment
M.M138463888.
20
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 2
➞ Basic Forms/ LOS a
non-core properties - hotels, senior housing, hospitals, - compare
Public Private
shares of REOCs direct investment higher required
Equity shares of REITs, ETFs, as a LP to an rate of return
index funds investment fund income + price
private REITs/REOCs
M.M138463888. appreciation
21
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 3
➞ Characteristics/ LOS a
a) unique asset & fixed location - compare
- no 2 properties are the same
(use, age, size, location, type of construction, quality of tenant
and leasing arrangement)
b) high unit value - indivisibility
e) Depreciation - or appreciation
Page 4
➞ Characteristics/ LOS a
g) Illiquidity - compare
22
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 5
➞ Risk Factors/ LOS a
e) Availability of Information - improving - compare
f) Lack of Liquidity
2. Property Operations/
a) Management - property + asset management
(day-to-day ops.) (monitoring performance)
Page 6
➞ Risk Factors/ LOS a
2. Property Operations/ - compare
e) Obsolescence - changes in tenant preferences, regulations, and
technology
- may not be economically viable to upgrade
23
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 7
➞ Economic drivers/
LOS b
GDP growth - most - explain
important single economic factor
consumer discretionary
- demand ↑ as incomes ↑
Page 8
➞ Role in an investment portfolio/ LOS b
1/ Current income - lease/rent income - explain
- typically largest component of return
2/ Price appreciation - capital gain component
3/ Inflation hedge - rents and property values typically rise with inflation
4/ Diversification - low correlation with the performance of traditional
asset classes
M.M138463888.
returns
correlations
- publicly traded
RE appears to
behave more like
stocks.
24
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 9
➞ Role in an investment portfolio/ LOS b
5/ Tax Benefits - depreciation tax shield for direct - explain
investments
- elimination of corporate tax for REITs as long as
a min. amount of taxable income is paid as a div.
Page 10
➞ Classifications/ LOS c
1/ Office - single tenant to multi-tenant - discuss
(build-to-suit) (typically has an anchor tenant)
25
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 11
➞ Classifications/
LOS c
4/ Hospitality - motels, small hotels, hotels at destinations - discuss
(airports, tourist resorts)
- some types are more mgmt. intensive (i.e. hotels, recreational facilities)
- often property ownership is separated from operating the
business
Page 12
➞ Investment characteristics by property type/ LOS c
Types of leases: - discuss
sale and leaseback - company sells the building to a real
estate investor and agrees to a long-term net lease
- medium/long-term leases include rent escalators (rent bumps or
rent step-ups)
- low vacancy rates + rising rents
➞ owner benefits more from short-term leases
(marking-to-market effects)
a) Office: depends heavily on employment growth
lease duration ~ 3-5-10 years
- typically net leases
M.M138463888.
26
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 13
➞ Investment characteristics by property type/ LOS c
c) Retail: depends on trends in consumer spending - discuss
- leases vary considerably anchors ➞ 10-20 yrs. favourable rents
attract other tenants
- triple net for strip malls, community sh. centers
- percentage lease for covered malls typically
Page 14
➞ Considerations in due diligence/ LOS d
market review - trends, local market pop., job, and - explain
27
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 15
➞ Considerations in due diligence/
LOS d
- for a real estate company (REIT) - explain
tenant concentration
balance sheet/leverage analysis
mgmt. ➞ backgrounds, skill sets, experience, track records
- completion and stabilization of developed properties
- unit upgrades
- financial statements + notes
- compare stock price with NAVPS
- compare cash flow multiples or div. yields with comparables
LOS e
➞ Appraisal-based indexes/
- discuss
NCREIF Property Index (NPI) - common U.S. Index
Page 16
➞ Appraisal-based indexes/ LOS e
𝐍𝐎𝐈 − 𝐂𝐀𝐏𝐄𝐗 + (𝐄𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐌𝐕 − 𝐁𝐞𝐠. 𝐌𝐕) - discuss
Return =
𝐁𝐞𝐠. 𝐌𝐕
HPR Ending MV
appraisals
(a single period IRR) Beg. MV
𝐍𝐎𝐈 − 𝐂𝐀𝐏𝐄𝐗
= cash return
𝐁𝐞𝐠. 𝐌𝐕
M.M138463888.
- a return measure is first calculated for each reported property and then
value-weighted to get the return for all properties in the index
- allows for the comparison of real estate performance with other
asset classes
- quarterly returns help measure risk (volatility or s.d. of returns)
- index also acts as a benchmark
28
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 17
➞ Transaction-based indexes/ LOS e
- requires observations of enough transactions - discuss
- both NCREIF and MSCI
Page 18
➞ Advantages/Disadvantages/ LOS e
lags market prices - discuss
- appraisal lag
smooths the index - understates volatility
(thus appearing to have lower correlations with other
asset classes)
also overstates Sharpe ratio
technique used
- the more transaction, the less noisy the series
29
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
b. justify the use of net asset value per share (NAVPS) in valuation of publicly
traded real estate securities and estimate NAVPS based on forecasted cash net
operating income
c. describe the use of funds from operations (FFO) and adjusted funds from
operations (AFFO) in REIT valuation
d. calculate and interpret the value of a REIT share using the net asset value,
relative value (price-to-FFO and price-to-AFFO), and discounted cash flow
approaches
M.M138463888.
30
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
- taxable
- REOC structure used when a jurisdiction does not have a
tax advantaged REIT regime in place
or/ engage to a large extent in the development of properties
(with the intent to sell)
or/ if they offer other non-qualifying services ➞ brokerage, 3rd party
property management
Page 2/
➞ Types of Publicly Traded Real Estate Securities/
31
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 3/
➞ Advantages/
➞ Disadvantages/
- lack of retained earnings - more frequent secondary offerings
- constrained in the types of assets the own
Page 4/
+ premium = potential overvaluation
➞ Net Asset Value per share
- discount = potential undervaluation
(NAVPS)
key word - over/under valuation may
largest component of be justified
intrinsic value
32
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 5/
NAVPS - difference between assets and liabilities all
taken at market value, divided by the number of
shares outstanding
# of shares outstanding
Page 6/
M.M138463888.
$𝟐, 𝟗𝟏𝟒, 𝟏𝟗𝟖
= $𝟓𝟐. 𝟑𝟑 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐏𝐒
𝟓𝟓, 𝟔𝟖𝟗
33
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 7/
- since comparables are from the private market,
so are cap-rates and values per square foot
- NAV reflects the value of a REITs/REOCs assets
to a private market buyer
Page 8/
➞ FFO/AFFO: widely accepted and reported measure of
the operating performance of a REIT
+ losses
➞ on sale of properties - do not represent sustainable
- gains
normal income
+ impairments
+ writedowns M.M138463888.
34
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 9/
➞ FFO/AFFO: AFFO is superior to FFO as a measure of
economic income since it takes into consideration
the CAPEX needed to maintain the economic
income of the property
- also more reflective of dividend-paying ability ex. # 30/31
Page 10/
drivers of multiples
2/ risk associated with the underlying real estate
- cash flow volatility associated with asset type,
quality, age, market conditions, etc…
-/ may not capture the intrinsic value of all real estate assets
(esp. non-income producing assets, e.g. undeveloped land)
P/FFO ignores cap. reinvestment necessary to maintain income levels
- P/AFFO does, wide variations in assumptions exist
35
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 11/
LOS n - calculate/interpret - mini case study
LOS o - explain
M.M138463888.
36
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
h. describe how factor models may be used to understand hedge fund risk
exposures
M.M138463888.
37
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 2
➞ Classification/ LOS a
- discuss
38
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 3
➞ Equity Strategies/ Long-Short Equity LOS b
- discuss
- reliance on fundamental
research
- most managers specialize in a
specific geography, sector or style
- some are more generalist
and avoid complex sectors
Page 4
➞ Equity Strategies/ Dedicated Short/Bias LOS b
- discuss
+ activist short
selling
➞ take a short position then
present research publicly
➞ reputation effect may help
39
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 5
➞ Equity Strategies/ Equity Market Neutral LOS b
- discuss
➞ 𝐄(𝛃𝐏 ) = 𝟎
➞ typically try to be sector and
industry neutral as well
(pairs trading, stub trading, multi-class
➞ more diverse holdings trading)
- adjusted often (daily, hourly)
must balance
neutrality with the costs
of rebalancing
often seen as preferred
replacements for FI during
low return periods or YC is
flat
➞ since 𝛃 = 𝟎, require leverage to
generate meaningful returns
Equity Strategies
Page 6
Short bias L/S
LOS b
Dedicated Market long-only - discuss
Short neutral (100% +)
(60%-120%)
Leverage low high low
Volatility high low high
𝛃 exposure negative neutral positive
Return Correlation negative zero positive
Orientation deep. fund. quantitative fundamental
Valuation approach absolute relative absolute
Position sizing concentrated diverse concentrated
M.M138463888.
40
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 7
Dedicated Short/Short Bias LOS b
𝛂 – stock picking, some market timing - discuss
return – lower than other HFs, but negative correlation
risk – more volatile than typical L/S benefit
Market Neutral
𝛂 – security selection, market timing
return – steadier than other equity hedge strategies
risk – less volatility, but leverage risk creates tail
risk
Page 8
Event-Driven Strategies/ Merger Arbitrage LOS c
- discuss
- soft-catalyst ED approach
- trade in anticipation of an
event
- hard-catalyst ED approach - trade
in reaction to an event
(less volatile/risky)
- cash-for-stock deal, buy target
stock
- Stock-for-stock deal, buy T and sell
A in same ratio as the offer
(contrarian approach - sell T, buy A)
uncorrelated source of alpha
- trades typically done using common
stock, but may include preferred,
M.M138463888.
or junior/senior debt
41
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 9
Event-Driven Strategies/ Distressed Securities LOS c
- in bankruptcy, potential bankruptcy, - discuss
or financial distress
Event-Driven Strategies
Page 10
Merger Arbitrage: LOS c
𝛂 – specific deal selection - discuss
return – 7 - 12% range, low correlation to market return
risk – low, single digit s.d.
- market sensitivity in times of market stress
∴ left-tail risk
Distressed Securities
𝛂 – deal selection, capital structure decisions
return – higher end of event-driven strategies
risk – higher volatility M.M138463888.
than other event-driven strategies
42
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 11
Relative Value Strategies/ Fixed-Income Arbitrage LOS d
- discuss
- valuation differences
between securities due to
credit quality, and/or implied
volatility spreads
Page 12
Relative Value Strategies/ Convertible Bond Arbitrage LOS d
- discuss
43
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Opportunistic Strategies
Page 13
- wide range of markets and securities LOS e
- discuss
region and asset-class level (vs. individual securities)
- broad themes, global relationships, market trends, cycles
- generally divided by:
technical fundamental
relies on mgr. skill, subject
discretionary to behavioral biases
rules-based algorithms, may
systematic fail in new contexts
(subject to herding effects)
use statistical methods use economic data and focus
to predict relative price on fair valuation of securities,
movements based on past sectors, markets
price trends
Page 14
➞ Global Macro ➞ wide range of asset classes LOS e
➞ focus on themes or regions - discuss
➞ top-down, typically fundamental
44
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 15
➞ Managed Futures LOS e
uncorrelated with stocks and bonds - discuss
returns tend to be positively skewed
- since funds only acquire asset exposure (not assets), the
majority of capital (85% - 90%) is invested in short-term
government debt
- tend more towards systematic trading with a quantitative
driven approach to trend identification
Page 16
Opportunistic Strategies/ Global Macro LOS e
Managed Futures - discuss
M.M138463888.
45
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 17
Specialist Strategies/ Volatility Trading LOS f
- discuss
Relative Value
volatility arbitrage
- buy cheap vol. and
sell more expensive vol.
Long/Short vol.
- VIX futures
- options
- swaps
(watch term structure
of vol., skew & smile)
M.M138463888.
46
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Page 19
Multi-Manager Strategies/ FoF, Multi-Strategy HF
LOS g
- discuss
FoF ➞ fees
fees
fund 1 … … … fund n
FoF manager allocates to
uncorrelated strategies
- more diversification
- less extreme risk exposure
- lower realized volatility
fees
Multi-strategy
strategy 1 … … … strategy n
47
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
REVIEW
M.M138463888.
48
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Commodities
Review - 1
⇒ commodity – a physical good that is tradable and supplied
without substantial differentiation (spot & future/forward
markets)
- potential for diversification – low 𝐫 with stocks
and bonds
- possible inflation hedging benefits
⇒ Energy/ – most economically valuable sector
1) Crude Oil - different grades (Brent, WTI)
– low in density ⇒ Light - low sulfur content ⇒ Sweet
- drivers of supply & demand technology extraction
politics refining
usage
2) Natural Gas business cycle
· associated gas – coming from an oil well
· unassociated gas – no oil present
- storage/transportation costs high - markets tend to be
- primary demand – electric generation regional
(heating/cooling)
⇒ Energy/ Review - 2
3) Refined products – heating oil, gasoline, jet fuel etc…
- shut down for planned maintenance 2x/yr. during low
demand periods
⇒ Grains/ · Corn · Soybean · Wheat · Rice - can be stored season
- heat/precipitation determine yield over season
⇒ Industrial (base) Metals/ - copper, aluminum, zinc, lead, tin, iron etc…
· demand tied very closely to GDP
feeder
⇒ Livestock/ · hogs · cattle · sheep · poultry
live
- depend on price of grains (input)
M.M138463888.
49
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Review - 3
⇒ Softs/ cash crops · cotton, coffee, sugar, cocoa
- weather affects supply, GDP growth affects demand
50
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
51
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Jan. Feb.
Commodities
Review - 6
⇒ Components of Futures Returns/
· Price return (spot yield) price 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 − 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
=
· change in price in the return 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
front month contract
· Roll – depends on the shape of the futures curve (p. 24)
roll return = "𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 − 𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫4 %’age of the
𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
× position
𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
being rolled
52
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Commodity Swaps
Page 28
e.g./ oil refiner ➞ long a swap that pays the LOS i
amount exceeding $100/barrel every - describe
month for 9 months
pays $25/barrel
for the 9-month period called an ‘excess return swap’
M.M138463888.
53
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Commodities
M.M138463888.
54
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Investment Characteristics
Review - 1
Equity:
1/ Long/short: specialize by region/sector/style (some generalists)
typically net long (pos. market factor exposures) (40 - 60%)
heterogeneity in exposures to various equity factors
alpha through stock picking (market timing poor)
𝐄(𝐑) ~ long only, 𝐄(𝛔) = 𝟏T𝟐 long only
liquid, average leverage
df
2/ Dedicated Short:
negatively correlated returns vs. equities and other HF
alpha through stock picking (market timing poor) strategies
60% - 120% short
𝛔𝐒 > 𝛔𝐋#
𝐒
liquid, low leverage
Review - 2
Equity:
3/ Equity Market Neutral:
high leverage, quantitative approach
steadier returns, less volatile
highly diversified, high liquidity
short IH, mean-reverting trades, higher turnover, tax
no/low beta risk issues
Event Driven:
df
4/ Merger-Arb.:
cash-for-stock ➞ long target
stock-for-stock ➞ long target, short acquirer (𝟕+ %)
cross-border M/A, vertical M/A ➞ wider spreads, more risk
friendly M/A, horizontal M/A, domestic deals ➞ smaller spreads
M.M138463888.
(3-7%)
left-tail risk due to M/A failures, market sensitivity (more deals
alpha from deal selection fail with
high leverage, 𝐄(𝐑) ~ low double digits, 𝐄(𝛔) < 𝟏𝟎% market stress)
55
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Review - 3
Event Driven:
5/ Distressed Securities:
very illiquid, long IH, longer lock-up periods
𝐄(𝐑) highest for event driven strategies, but higher 𝛔
typically long-biased (returns are
low diversification, concentrated positions lumpy and
best in early recovery period cyclical)
df
moderate to low leverage (1.2x – 1.7x NAV)
Relative Value:
6/ Fixed Income Arbitrage: - credit quality, liquidity, volatility premiums
reversion to the mean
net positive carry (as well)
high levels of leverage (4x – 5x)
liquidity varies by security type
Review - 4
Relative Value:
7/ Convertible Bond Arbitrage
tend to be volatility related trades
more illiquid (small issues sizes) ➞ low investment
high levels of leverage (3x) capacity
may/may not hedge credit, interest rate risk
diversification benefit, small return, risk reduction effect
df
Opportunistic:
8/ Global Macro
fundamental/technical, discretionary, some systematic
strong trends or themes (mean reverting, low vol. markets
risk factor exposure very heterogeneous, dynamic poor)
high leverage, 6x – 7x
M.M138463888.
56
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Review - 5
Opportunistic:
9/ Managed Futures:
uncorrelated with stocks/bonds
cyclical return profile, range-bound, mean-reverting
markets poor
highly liquid, systematic, trend following, wide range
of risk factor exp.
positively skewed returns in stressed markets
higher volatility than most
df HFs
high leverage
Specialist:
10/ Volatility Trading - long vol. ➞ positive convexity, short equity bet
- short vol. ➞ premium income, long equity bet
- low leverage
11/ Reinsurance/Life Settlement – no asset class correlation
- very specialized skills
- low investment capacity
Review - 6
Multi-Strategy:
F-o-F: - diversification, investment access
- liquidity, manager selection expertise
- strategic, tactical, style allocation
- lower realized 𝛔, less single mgr. risk
- netting risk, added layer of fees, less transparency
- steady, low vol. returns
df
Multi-Strategy – faster tactical allocations
- GP absorbs netting risk, one layer of fees
- concentration of M.M138463888.
operational risks
- steady, low vol. returns > FoF, but more variance
- less investor liquidity than FoF
- more leverage than FoF
57
Last Revised: 08/14/2023
Hedge Funds
Review - 7
LOS h/
Conditional Factor Risk Model
𝐑 𝐇𝐅𝐢 = 𝛂𝐢 + 𝛃𝐢,𝟏 𝐅𝟏 + ⋯ + 𝛃𝐢,𝐧 𝐅𝐧
+ 𝐃𝐭 𝛃𝐢,𝟏 𝐅𝟏 + ⋯ + 𝐃𝐭 𝛃𝐢,𝐧 𝐅𝐧
df
dummy var. ➞ incremental exposure
e.g. 𝛃𝟏 = . 𝟕𝟏 or 𝛃𝟐 = . 𝟔𝟒
𝐃𝛃𝟏 = . 𝟎𝟑 𝐃𝛃𝟐 = −. 𝟎𝟖
. 𝟕𝟒 . 𝟓𝟔
Review - 8
LOS i/
- when added to a 60/40 eq./fx-inc. port.
df
M.M138463888.
58