Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views11 pages

Predicate Logic vs Propositional Logic

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views11 pages

Predicate Logic vs Propositional Logic

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Predicate Logic, Discrete Mathematics

Dr. Mohammad Salah Uddin

Associate Professor
Dept. of CSE
East West University

October 30, 2024


Limitations of Propositional Logic
■ Lack of Expressiveness:
Propositional logic cannot express statements involving variables or
quantifiers. For example, statements like “All humans are mortal”
or “Some dogs are friendly” cannot be represented.
■ No Relations Between Objects:

It cannot express relationships between multiple entities, such as


“John is taller than Sarah.”
■ Scalability Issues:

Propositional logic needs a separate statement for each fact. When


there are many facts to represent, it becomes hard to manage. For
example, describing each person in a large group would require
many individual statements, making it difficult to work with on a
large scale.
■ No Quantifiers:

Propositional logic lacks quantifiers like “for all” (∀) and “there
exists” (∃). Statements involving generalization or existence
2 of 11
Examples of Limitations in Propositional Logic

Example 1: Representing People in a Group


■ To express ”Shanto is a student,” “Urmi is a student,” and ”Wasim
is a student,” propositional logic requires separate statements:

Student Shanto, Student Urmi, Student Wasim

■ With 1000 students, 1000 statements would be needed, making it


hard to manage.

3 of 11
Examples of Limitations in Propositional Logic
(Contd.)

Example 2: Expressing Universal Truths


■ To represent “All dogs are friendly,” propositional logic requires a
statement for each dog:

Friendly Dog1, Friendly Dog2, Friendly Dog3, . . .

■ Predicate logic can simplify this as:

∀x (Dog(x) → Friendly(x))

4 of 11
Examples of Limitations in Propositional Logic
(Contd.)

Example 3: Describing Relationships


■ For statements like “John likes Mary” and “Alam likes Bithi,”
propositional logic needs unique statements for each pair:

Likes John Mary, Likes Alam Bithi

■ Predicate logic allows us to express “likes” as a relationship:

Likes(x, y )

■ This approach avoids listing every possible pair individually.

5 of 11
Predicate Logic (First-Order Logic)
Predicate logic overcomes the limitations of propositional logic by
introducing:
■ Objects and Predicates: Statements are constructed using

objects (e.g., John, Dog) and predicates (e.g., is mortal,


loves).
□ Example: Loves(John, Mary) means “John loves Mary.”
■ Quantifiers:
□ Universal Quantifier (∀): Used for statements true for all members
of a set.
∀x Human(x) → Mortal(x)
Meaning: “All humans are mortal.”
□ Existential Quantifier (∃): Used for statements where at least one
member of a set satisfies a condition.
∃x Dog(x) ∧ Friendly(x)
Meaning: “There exists a dog that is friendly.”
6 of 11
Complex Relationships in Predicate Logic
Predicate logic allows us to express complex relationships between
multiple objects, which is not possible in propositional logic. Here are
some examples:
■ Taller(John, Mary) means “John is taller than Mary.”
■ This relationship involves two objects (John and Mary) and the
predicate “Taller.”
■ Parent(Alice, Bob) means “Alice is a parent of Bob.”
■ Sibling(Bob, Sarah) means “Bob and Sarah are siblings.”
■ Predicate logic allows us to define relationships between family
members clearly.
■ Owns(Alam, BookJava) means “Alam owns java Book.”
■ Owns(John, Car) means “John owns a car.”

7 of 11
Relationships in Predicate Logic

■ WorksFor(Emma, CompanyA) means “Emma works for


CompanyA.”
■ Manages(Sarah, Emma) means “Sarah manages Emma.”
■ Teaches(ProfSmith, Calculus) means “Professor Smith
teaches Calculus.”
■ Studies(StudentX, Calculus) means “Student X studies
Calculus.”

8 of 11
Building Blocks of Predicate Logic
Predicate logic, also known as First-Order Logic, consists of several
key components that allow it to represent complex statements and
relationships. Here are the main building blocks:
■ Objects (Constants):

□ Objects represent specific entities or items within a domain.


□ Examples: John, Alice, Dog1, BookA
■ Predicates:
□ Predicates represent properties of objects or relationships between
objects.
□ Notation: Predicate(Object) or Predicate(Object1, Object2)
□ Examples: Human(John) means “John is a human”; Loves(John,
Mary) means “John loves Mary.”
■ Variables:
□ Variables are placeholders that can represent any object in the domain.
□ Notation: Typically denoted by lowercase letters such as x, y, z.
□ Example: In Loves(x, Mary), x can represent any person who might
love Mary.
9 of 11
Building Blocks of Predicate Logic
■ Quantifiers:
□ Universal Quantifier (∀): Asserts that a statement is true for all
objects in the domain.
∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x))
Meaning: “All humans are mortal.”
□ Existential Quantifier (∃): Asserts that a statement is true for at
least one object in the domain.
∃x (Dog(x) ∧ Friendly(x))
Meaning: “There exists a dog that is friendly.”
■ Logical Connectives:
□ Connectives are used to form complex statements.
■ Conjunction (∧): And
■ Disjunction (∨): Or
■ Negation (¬): Not
■ Implication (→): If-then
□ Example: Human(x) ∧ Mortal(x) means “x is both human and
10 of 11
mortal.”
Identifying Predicates in Predicate Logic
In predicate logic, a predicate is an expression that represents a
property of objects or a relationship between objects. It takes one or
more arguments (objects or variables) and returns true or false.
■ Predicates (Valid):

□ Human(John) - Represents the property ”John is a human.”


□ Loves(Alice, Bob) - Represents the relationship ”Alice loves Bob.”
□ GreaterThan(x, y) - Represents the relationship ”x is greater than
y.”
□ Dog(D) - Represents the property ”D is a dog.”
■ Not Predicates (Invalid):
□ John - This is simply a constant representing an object, not a
predicate.
□ Human - Without any argument, it does not convey a complete

meaning (no specific object is described as human).


□ Loves(Alice) - Predicates require the correct number of arguments;

”Loves” expects two arguments to complete the relationship.


□ 3 + 4 - This is an arithmetic expression; it does not convey a

11 of 11 property or relationship that can be true or false.

You might also like