Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit: - 2
Design and installation of the Automatic sprinkler system:
Standard automatic sprinkler system design,
Sprinkler system component and types,
Determine system types and configuration,
Area protected, Branch line, Maximum allowable distance between sprinkler.
Hydraulic calculation of sprinkler systems,
Sprinkler K- factor calculation.
Testing and Maintenance of Automatic Sprinkler Systems as per relevant national and
international standards.
Since the sprinkler system serve unattended areas, it is important that humans can be altered
whenever sprinkler is activated for this purpose, flow switches are installed at each sprinkler
zone. Whenever a sprinkler is activated water flows out from the pipes to the sprinkler head.
The flow of the water through a zone pipe activates a flow switch. The electrical signal from
the flow switch activates an alarm at the main fire alarm panel. Each zone is provided with an
isolation valve, a flow switch and a test drain valve. Depending on the size of the building,
there may be several water riser pipes supplying to all the floors of a building.
Pressure gauges, check valves and alarm gongs are installed in each riser. The alarm gong is
actuated by the flow of water through the check valve and not by electrical signal of the
individual sprinkler zones.
Normally, the sprinkler system is fed from the underground water storage tank and dual
supply is maintained from the overhead water storage tank. The water supply from the tank is
generally provided in such manner to give positive pressure to the pump suction side. Fire
brigade connections is provided on the installations to facilitate the fire brigade appliances to
provide water to sprinkler heads. The pumps are designed to supply required quantity of
water at a particular design pressure. The pumps are installed in series to meet the increasing
demand of sprinler heads in the fire zone, these pumps operate automatically when the
pressure falla at a predetermined level through the pressure switches. However, the minor
lekage in the sprinkler system can be replenished with jockey pump at a higher pressure. The
detail of different compnents of automatic sprinkler system are given below:
A. Automatic sprinkler Heads
a. Fusible link
b. Bulb type
c. On-off sprinkler head
B. Sprinkler Rating
The sprinkler heads have numerous rating values and hence proper selection sprinkler
head is an important aspect in the design of sprinkler system. If the sprinkler heads of
lower rating is chosen, this results in operation of more number of sprinkler head
resulting in wastage of water, whereas the sprinkler heads of high rating results in
operation of less number of sprinkler heads on a relatively larger fire. The rating of
fusible link type and bulb type sprinkler head can be identified with the colours of the
yoke arm and bulb which are given in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively.
Figure 2:- Distance between rows (X) and spacing of sprinklers (Y) requirement
Table 6: - Range and terminal distribution pipe nominal sizes for number of
sprinklers in light hazard installation
Pipe Pipe size (mm) Maximum Length (m) Maximum number of sprinklers
to be fed
Steel 20 8 1
25 NA 3
For moderate hazard installation, range pipe nominal sizes downstream of the design
point and maximum number of sprinklers to be fed are given in Table 7.
Table 7: - Range pipe nominal sizes for number of sprinklers in moderate hazard
installation
Table 8: - Distribution pipe nominal sizes for the number of sprinklers in moderate
hazard installation
Range pipe layout Pipe size Maximum number of sprinklers to be fed
a. Two end side 32 2
40 4
50 8
65 16
b. All other type 32 3
40 6
50 9
65 18
For high-hazard installation, recalculated range pipe and distribution pipe nominal bores
downstream of the design point and a maximum number of sprinklers to be fed are given in
Table 9 and Table 10, respectively.
Table 9: - Range pipe nominal sizes for the number of sprinklers (15mm dia.) in high-
hazard installation
Range pipe layout Pipe size Maximum number of sprinklers to be fed
a. Range at remote end of each distribution pipe spur:
1. Last two range in 25 1
an end side layout 32 2
2. The last three 25 2
ranges in an end- 32 3
side layout
3. Last range in all 25 2
other layouts 32 3
40 4
4. All other ranges 25 3
32 4
Table 10: - Distribution pipe nominal sizes for number of sprinklers (15mm dia) in high
hazard installation
Distribution pipe nominal size (mm) Maximum number of sprinklers to be fed
32 2
40 4
50 8
65 12
80 18
100 48
Static pressure difference between two interconnecting points in a system is calculated from:
Ps = 0.1h (3)
Where, h = Vertical distance between the points (m)
Frictional losses (Pf) between the most hydraulic remote design point and installation valve is
the combined value of frictional loss in pipes and pressure losses in fittings and valves.
Frictional loss in pipes can be calculated from the Hazen-Williams formula as under:
5
6.05 × 10 1.85
∆ P f = 1.85 4.87
× l× F (4)
K P × Da
Where, ΔPf = Frictional loss per meter length in pipe (bar)
F = Flow rate through the pipe (lpm)
Do = Mean bore of the pipe (m)
l = Equivalent length of pipe and fitting (m)
KP = A constant for the type and condition of pipe
Cast Iron Pipe = 100, Mild Steel pipe = 120
Galvanised Steel = 120, Copper = 150
Loss of pressure due to water flow through pipe fittings and valve can be calculated
by adding the appropriate equivalent pipe lengths as given in Table 11.
Table 11: - Equivalent pipe length for fittings and valves (Kf =120)
Fitting Equivalent length (m) of medium-grade steel pipe for diameter in (mm)
Valve 25 32 40 50 65 80 100 150 200 250
Screwed 90o 0.77 1.04 1.22 1.46 1.89 2.37 3.04 4.30 5.67 7.42
elbow
Welded 90o 0.36 0.49 0.56 0.69 0.88 1.10 1.43 2.00 2.64 3.35
elbow
Screwed 45o 0.40 0.55 0.66 0.76 1.02 1.27 1.61 2.30 3.05 3.89
elbow
All other 1.54 2.13 2.44 2.91 3.81 4.75 6.10 8.61 11.34 13.85
fitting
Gate Valve - - - 0.38 0.51 0.63 0.81 1.13 1.50 1.97
Alarm valve - - - - - 3.4 5.07 7.17 9.40 12.30
NR valve
Alarm valve - - - - - 119.71 5.36 35.88 47.27 61.85
NR valve
(Mushroom)
Butterfly - - - 2.19 2.86 3.55 4.56 6.38 8.62 9.90
valve
Globe valve - - - 6.43 21.64 126.80 34.48 48.79 64.29 84.11
Note: -
1. The equivalent lengths can be converted as necessary for pipes of cast iron by
multiplying the above values by 0.714.
2. It is recommended to avoid, as far as possible, 25 mm-sized elbows in the installation.
For the purpose of calculating minimum sprinkler discharge pressure and required discharge
density, hydraulically, most unfavourable location (AMAO) is to be determined. The AMAO
is the sprinkler array of specified shapes at which the water supply pressure is the maximum
needed to give the specified design density. The shape of the hydraulic most unfavorable area
is assumed as far as possible, rectangular and normally considered the most remote loop or
between the distribution pipes. The discharge pressure and flow are determined at the nodes
in the AMAO. The nodes are the specified points in the AMAO.
Numerical
Analyse the following sprinkler arrays for water and energy power consumption:
a. Two end centre with end feed array
b. Four end side with end feed array
c. Two end centre with centre feed array
The following design parameters are to be considered common:
Solution:
The example analyses three types of sprinkler arrays used in sprinkler installation
a. Two end centre with end feed
Water flow (F) and pressure (P) requirements are determined at the remotest sprinkler and
in two end center arrays see Figure 4 and Table 12. Forty sprinklers are considered in
AMAO (360 m2).
If the pressure requirement at the remotest sprinkler is 0.35 bar (from Table 8.8), using
Equation, the discharge at the remotest sprinkler head is calculated as:
Q=K √ P=80 √ 0.5=56.57 lpm
At sprinkler 2, using Equation, frictional loss (ΔPf) between sprinkler Sp1 and SP2 (length
3m and dia 25mm) is determined as:
5
6.05× 10
×3 ×56.57 =0.0 7 ¿¯
1.85
∆ Pf= 1.85 4.87
120 ×25
Hence, for maintaining the pressure requirement at sprinkler SP1 as 0.5 bar, total pressure
requirement at sprinkler SP2 is 0.5+0.07 = 0.57 bar.
The discharge at sprinkler SP2 is calculated as follows
F=K √ P=80 √ 0.57=60.40 lpm
Hence, total water flow in the range pipe of two end sprinkler array on one side is 56.57 +
60.40 = 116.97 lpm
Frictional loss between sprinkler SP2 and node 1 (Length 1.5m and Diameter 25mm) is
determined as :
5
6.05× 10
×1.5 ×116.97 =0. 13 ¯¿
1.85
∆ Pf= 1.85 4.87
120 ×25
Hence, total pressure requirement at node 1 is 0.57 + 0.13 = 0.70 bar.
The total water discharge to the range pipe on both sides at the node 1 is 116.97 x 2 = 233.94
lpm.
Branch K-factor (Kf-factor) is determined at the extreme end branch where the water flow is
equivalent to the center feed pipe.
233.94
Kb= =27 9.61
√0.70
At node 2, frictional loss between nodes 1 and node 2 (length 3m and diameter 40mm
Diameter of pipe is considered as per IS15105:2021, Table 21) is determined as:
5
6.05 ×10
×3 × 233.94 =0.0 9 ¯¿
1.85
∆ Pf= 1.85 4.87
120 ×40
Hence, total pressure requirement at node 2 is 0.7 + 0.09 = 0.79 bar.
The total discharge to the range pipe from node 2 is calculated as
F=K √ P=27 9.61 √ 0.79=2 48.52 lpm
Hence, total water flow at the node 2 is 248.52 + 233.94 = 482.46 lpm.
Similarly the discharge and pressure requirement is calculated at the other nodes. Outcome
are shown in the figure and table.
Figure 4 :- Design pressure and flow requirement in two end centre with end feed
sprinkler installation
Table12: - Design pressure and flow requirement in two end center with end feed
sprinkler installation
Sprin Pipe Pipe Eq. Total Press Cumul Sprinkler Cumula Remark
kler or Dia Length Length Length ure ative or node tive
Node (Da) (l) (l) (l) loss pressu flow (F) flow
(ΔPf) re loss
(P)
Sp1 - - - - - 0.50 56.57 - Hydraulic
remotest point
Sp2 25 3 0 3 0.07 0.57 60.40 116.97 -
1 25 1.5 0 1.5 0.13 0.70 233.94 233.94 Branch K-factor
= 279.61
2 40 3 0 3 0.09 0.79 248.52 482.46 -
3 50 3 0 3 0.13 0.92 268.19 750.65 -
4 65 3 0 3 0.08 1.00 279.61 1030.26 -
5 65 3 0 3 0.14 1.14 298.54 1328.80 -
6 80 3 0 3 0.08 1.22 308.84 1637.64 -
7 80 3 0 3 0.12 1.34 323.67 1961.31 -
8 80 3 0 3 0.17 1.61 354.79 2316.10 -
9 100 3 0 3 0.08 1.69 363.49 2679.59 -
10 100 3 0 3 0.10 1.79 374.09 3053.68 -
11 100 1.5 3 4.5 0.20 1.99 3053.68 Fitting 90o elbow
12 100 6 3 9 0.39 2.38 3053.68 Fitting 90o elbow
13 100 30 3 33 1.45 3.83+3 3053.68 Fitting 90o elbow;
= 6.83 Static pressure
(30m = 3 bar
approx.)
14 150 25 30 55 0.34 7.17 3053.68 Six 90o elbow
(18m); NR, ICV
and alarm valve
(12m)
The fire pump is required to deliver a minimum flow rate 3053.68 lpm (50.89 l/s) at 7.17
bars.
Figure 5 :- Design pressure and flow requirement in four end side with end feed
sprinkler installation
Table13: - Design pressure and flow requirement in four end side with end feed
sprinkler installation
Sprin Pipe Pipe Eq. Total Press Cumul Sprinkler Cumula Remark
kler or Dia Length Length Length ure ative or node tive
Node (Da) (l) (l) (l) loss pressu flow (F) flow
(ΔPf) re loss
(P)
Sp1 - - - - - 0.50 56.57 - Hydraulic
remotest point
Sp2 25 3 0 3 0.07 0.57 60.40 116.97 -
Sp3 25 3 0 3 0.27 0.84 73.32 190.29 -
Sp4 32 3 0 3 0.20 1.04 81.58 271.87 -
1 40 1.5 0 1.5 0.07 1.11 84.29 356.16 Branch K-factor
=
356.16
=338.05
√ 1.11
2 40 3 0 3 0.21 1.32 388.39 744.55 -
3 50 3 0 3 0.28 1.60 427.60 1172.15 -
4 65 3 0 3 0.18 1.78 451.01 1623.16 -
5 65 3 0 3 0.33 2.11 491.04 2114.21 -
6 80 3 0 3 0.20 2.31 513.79 2628.00 -
7 80 3 0 3 0.30 2.61 546.14 3174.14 -
8 80 3 0 3 0.42 3.03 588.44 3762.58 -
9 100 3 0 3 0.19 3.22 606.61 4369.19 -
10 100 3 0 3 0.26 3.48 630.62 4999.81 -
11 100 1.5 3 4.5 0.49 3.97 4999.81 Fitting 90o elbow
12 100 4.5 3 7.5 0.82 4.79 4999.81 Fitting 90o elbow
13 100 30 3 33 3.61 8.4 + 3 4999.81 Fitting 90o elbow;
= 11.4 Static pressure
(30m = 3 bar
approx.)
14 150 25 30 55 0.83 12.23 4999.81 Six 90o elbow
(18m); NR, ICV
and alarm valve
(12m)
The fire pump is required to deliver a minimum flow rate 4999.81 lpm (83.33 l/s) at 12.23
bars.
c. Two end centre with centre feed array
Following figure and table show the water flow and pressure requirement in two end
centre with centre feed sprinkler installation. Forty sprinklers are considered for analysis
as given AMAO = 360m2.
Figure 6 :- Design pressure and flow requirement in two end centre with centre
feed sprinkler installation
Table14: - Design pressure and flow requirement in two end centre with centre
feed sprinkler installation
Sprin Pipe Pipe Eq. Total Press Cumul Sprinkler Cumula Remark
kler or Dia Length Length Length ure ative or node tive
Node (Da) (l) (l) (l) loss pressu flow (F) flow
(ΔPf) re loss
(P)
Sp1 - - - - - 0.50 56.57 - Hydraulic
remotest point
Sp2 25 3 0 3 0.07 0.57 60.40 116.97 -
1 25 1.5 0 1.5 0.13 0.70 116.97x2 233.94 Branch K-factor
= 233.94 = 279.61
2 40 3 0 3 0.09 0.79 248.52 482.46 -
3 50 3 0 3 0.13 0.92 268.19 750.65 -
4 65 3 0 3 0.08 1.00 279.61 1030.26 -
5 65 3 0 3 0.14 1.14 298.54 1328.80 -
6 80 1.5 3 4.5 0.13 1.27 315.10 1643.91 Fitting 90o elbow
7 100 6 3 9 0.13 1.40 330.84 1974.75
13 100 30 3 33 0.65 2.05+3 1974.75 Fitting 90o elbow;
= 5.05 Static pressure
(30m = 3 bar
approx.)
14 150 25 30 55 0.15 5.20 1974.75 Six 90o elbow
(18m); NR, ICV
and alarm valve
(12m)
The fire pump is required to deliver a minimum flow rate 1974.75 lpm (32.91 l/s) at 5.20
bars.
The results of three analyses are compared and shown in following table. Analysis of
three sprinkler arrays shows the two end centre with centre feed is the most
advantageous in terms of water discharge and pressure requirement (energy saving)
Fire sprinkler design is a detailed process, and designers are highly skilled and qualified
professionals. They frequently hold a Professional Engineer (PE) certification and meet local
and state licensing standards. Jurisdictions often defer testing and licensing for sprinkler
system layouts to the National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies
(NICET). Usually, at least a NICET Level III Water-Based System Layout certification is
required to work without supervision as a sprinkler system designer.
Sprinkler system design begins with water— everything else depends on having enough of it
ready to control a fire. NFPA 13 requires an automatic water supply for sprinkler systems
(5.1.2), meaning that the water will flow through sprinkler heads without any human
intervention.
Many possible sources can be used, including city water, ponds, rivers, reservoirs, water
tanks, pressure tanks, and gravity tanks or water towers. But in most cases, a municipal
waterworks is the go-to supply.
Whatever the source, it must have sufficient capacity for fire control (5.1.3). The factors that
determine capacity include flow rate (in gallons per minute, GPM), pressure (in pounds per
square inch, PSI), and duration (how long it can maintain the required pressure and flow).
For a municipal water supply, capacity is determined with a flow test performed at nearby
fire hydrants.
A flow test requires at least two hydrants, A and B. First, a static pressure reading is taken at
hydrant A while neither hydrant is flowing water. Then, hydrant B is opened wide and
another pressure reading is taken at hydrant A. This residual pressure reading is the amount
of pressure that can push water through sprinkler heads (minus some losses). A pitot tool is
used to measure the pressure of the water flowing from hydrant B. In this video, Grapevine,
TX’s fire department shows how to conduct a flow test:
Q=29.83 x C x d2 x P
With:
The water supply capacity is the foundation of sprinkler system design. Many of the steps
following this one is all about ensuring hydraulic demands won’t exceed this capacity.
Designers choose pipes and sprinklers to make the hydraulic calculations work out. If they
can’t do it with the available flow and pressure, they have to resort to using a fire pump
(which may cost tens of thousands of dollars) to boost the water supply.
If the first step of sprinkler system design is knowing the water supply, the second is
understanding the building. Sprinkler system designers sit down with the architectural and
engineering plans to sort out just what the building needs from a sprinkler system. Is it a
residential structure? Industrial? How significant is the fuel load? Will it have climate
control?
Questions like these. determine the requirements the system should meet and what kind of
sprinkler system is appropriate.
As mentioned, NFPA 13 is the go-to standard for commercial sprinkler system design. NFPA
13-compliant systems are defined by full sprinkler coverage. The standard is typically used
in commercial facilities—offices, mercantile spaces, warehouses, industrial buildings, etc.
In addition to determining the standard, designers also have to figure out whether a building
needs a wet pipe system, dry pipe system, or preaction sprinkler system.
Most buildings simply use a wet sprinkler system in which water fills the pipes at all times.
As soon as a sprinkler head operates, water flows.
Structures like parking garages where freezing is a concern need dry pipe systems, so named
for the absence of water in the pipes. A dry valve, held shut by a pressurized gas, stops the
water in an insulated section of the pipe until its needed. When a sprinkler head activates, the
gas depressurizes, the dry valve opens, and water flows.
Parking garages and other structures without climate control often use dry sprinkler systems
to prevent water in pipes from freezing. Image source: ArmourCo
Where the cost of an accidental discharge would be severe (such as in an art gallery),
a preaction system may be used. Water is held back by a preaction valve, which may also
function as a dry valve. Activation also relies on a separate trigger, such as electric input from
a smoke or heat detector, providing another layer of control over whether the water flows
from sprinklers.
Know the building—how much water is needed for fire sprinkler design, including the
hazard level?
How much water does it take to control a fire? This depends on many factors, including the
size of the fire and the type of fuel. Three conceptual tools help designers plan systems that
can produce sufficient water flow and pressure: occupancy hazard, design area,
and density/area curves.
Occupancy hazard
NFPA 13 groups (4.3) buildings or portions of buildings into occupancy hazards, helping
designers estimate the fuel load and thus the water demands. The assignment of an occupancy
hazard depends on several factors explained in NFPA 13:
Warehouses—like the Redlands warehouse near Los Angeles that burned June 5, 2020—have
special hydraulic needs. The occupancy hazard concept helps designers plan systems that can
meet a facility’s hydraulic needs. Image source: KTLA via Redlands Community News
NFPA 13’s hazard classifications are (19.3.1.2.4):
Light Hazard
Ordinary Hazard (Group 1)
Ordinary Hazard (Group 2)
Extra Hazard (Group 1)
Extra Hazard (Group 2)
Special occupancy hazard (including storage)
It’s important to note that NFPA 13’s occupancy hazard categories apply only to the design
of sprinkler systems and “shall not be intended to be a general classification of occupancy
hazards” (4.3.1.2). NFPA 101: Life Safety Code also groups buildings into occupancy
hazards, but these classifications are different; they’re related to threats to life, not fuel load.
Design area
The design area concept lets designers select a worst-case scenario part of their building to
base the whole system around. As with hazard level, “worst-case scenario” refers to
hydraulics. The design area is a “hydraulically challenging” location, usually because of high
elevation and/or its distance from the fire sprinkler riser. The design area concept is used
because it would be impractical to supply every fire sprinkler with water at once.
Identifying a design area isn’t always straightforward, so layout professionals often perform
calculations for multiple areas to find the one with the highest demand. NFPA 13 has various
rules for the selection of the design area.
Density/area curves
Designers use the hazard level and design area to determine how much water they need
with density/area curves. “How much water” means water density—gallons per minute per
square foot (GPM/ft2). When designers know the hazard level of their building and the size of
the design area, they can use the density-area curves (19.3.3.1.1) provided by NFPA 13 to
determine the exact required water density.
Once the design area density is determined from the curve, calculating the total required flow
is simple. Flow (GPM) is density times area.
Sprinkler system design is an iterative process. Designers have to tentatively plan a set-up
and then check the math to see if the hydraulic calculations work out. One part of this process
involves laying out and sizing the sprinkler heads.
Laying out sprinkler heads and determining their coverage area in fire sprinkler design
To know how much density a sprinkler can deliver, a designer must first determine the area it
covers. They follow guidelines from NFPA 13 to ensure that sprinklers cover an appropriate
amount of space.
Tables 10.2.4.2.1(a-d) tell how far apart, on centre, standard-spray upright and pendent
sprinklers can be. The max distance is 15 ft., but this is reduced in many situations. Whatever
distance between sprinklers is allowed, the heads can be no more than half that distance
(10.2.5.2.1) from the walls. So, the max length from a sprinkler to a wall is 7.5 ft.
Designers mark the location of sprinklers and pipes on the plans based on these rules and then
determine how much space each head protects according to NFPA 13’s rules. There is a limit
to how much floor space one sprinkler can reasonably cover. These maximum protection
areas for standard spray sprinklers are also laid out in Tables 10.2.4.2.1(a-d); the biggest
possible value is 225 ft.2, but this is only applicable in non combustible unobstructed spaces.
(And note that different types of sprinklers, such as extended coverage, have different rules
and values.)
Protection area, As is calculated with the formula A s=S x L (9.5.2.1). Along the branch line, S
is the larger of either:
K=q/√p
Designers often select a common K-factor and check to see if
they can achieve the required flow with the available pressure. If
they can’t, they may choose another K-factor. Or, they may change something about the
pipes to boost the available pressure.
Laying out system components—pipes, fittings, and hydraulic calculations in fire
sprinkler design
When designers lay out a sprinkler system on paper (or digitally, nowadays), they mark
where the pipes will go and decide their size and material. Pipe selection affects hydraulic
calculations, cost, corrosion resistance, and more.
The flow test only tells designers how much pressure is available from the source and at the
base of the system riser. They have less to work with at the sprinkler heads because of head
loss. Head loss is the loss of pressure due to resistance as fluid flows in pipes from its source
to its destination.
Three kinds of resistance create head loss—gravity, friction, and turbulence. Designers
can’t fight the effects of gravity unless they use pumps; no matter the pipes’ diameter, 0.433
psi is lost for every vertical foot. But they can and do select pipes, fittings, and devices to
reduce the head loss from friction and turbulence.
The friction of water against the walls of the pipe fights against the pressure from the water
supply. The size of the friction force depends on three factors:
p = (4.52Q1.85) ÷ (C1.85d4.87)
Selecting appropriate pipe materials and sizes helps minimize friction losses. If hydraulic
calculations reveal that a sprinkler head in the design area won’t get enough pressure to
produce the design density, the pipes’ size can be increased to reduce pressure loss.
Pipe material also affects the pressure losses. C-value describes the roughness of the pipe,
and pipe made of copper (C=150) or CPVC (C=150), for example, is smoother than one
made of unlined cast iron (C=100).
With pipe size and material, there are considerations other than the hydraulic calculations.
Up-front and long-term costs are also important things to think about. Bigger pipe costs more,
and copper pipe costs more than thermoplastics, for example. Nonmetallic pipes like CPVC
also have unique concerns regarding exposure and melting and can only be used in specific
settings.
Balancing cost and function is a major part of a fire sprinkler system designer’s job.
The math behind turbulence loss is complicated, but NFPA 13 allows designers to estimate
head loss from devices and fittings in terms of equivalent feet of pipe (27.2.3.1.1). Tables
from either NFPA 13 or manufacturer data indicate what length of pipe will create the same
head loss that a particular device or fitting makes.
Backflow preventers are frequently unavoidable sources of pressure loss from turbulence.
There are pressure-eating devices that can’t be left out of the equation. For
instance, backflow preventers are frequently required to prevent the contamination of
municipal water supplies. If the city supply loses pressure for whatever reason, stagnant
water in a fire sprinkler system could flow backward, contaminating potable water. Backflow
preventers tend to create large head losses, but this is unavoidable where they are required.
Designing fire sprinkler systems involves many elements. Designers check the water supply,
identify building needs, lay out pipes and sprinklers, and perform hydraulic calculations.
Sprinkler systems definitively save lives and property, but they only work as intended when
they’re well-engineered and up to code. Always rely on a licensed professional to design a
fire sprinkler system. And note that different states and municipalities may have additional
requirements from what’s specified in NFPA 13.
Sprin Pipe Pipe Eq. Total Press Cumul Sprinkler Cumula Remark
kler or Dia Length Length Length ure ative or node tive
Node (Da) (l) (l) (l) loss pressu flow (F) flow
(ΔPf) re loss
(P)
Sp1 - - - - - 0.50 56.57 - Hydraulic
remotest point
Sp2 25 3 0 3 0.07 0.57 60.40 116.97 -
1 25 1.5 0 1.5 0.13 0.70 233.94 233.94 Branch K-factor
= 279.61
2 50 3 0 3 0.03 0.73 238.90 472.84 -
3 65 3 0 3 -
4 65 3 0 3 -
5 65 3 0 3 -
6 65 3 0 3 -
7 65 3 0 3 -
8 80 3 0 3 -
9 80 3 0 3 -
10 100 3 0 3 -
11 100 1.5 3 4.5 2551.06 2551.06 Fitting 90o elbow
12 100 6 3 9 2551.06 2551.06 Fitting 90o elbow
13 100 30 3 33 2551.06 2551.06 Fitting 90o elbow;
Static pressure
(30m = 3 bar
approx.)
14 150 25 30 55 2551.06 2551.06 Six 90o elbow
(18m); NR, ICV
and alarm valve
(12m)