Amer 2005
Amer 2005
* Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ. Egypt, Institute of Agric. Eng. (ATB), Potsdam, Germany;
Abstract: Thin-layer drying rates of plum fruits were determined experimentally under
different controlled conditions of the drying air for estimation mathematically the
affecting parameters on the drying time.
The results showed that cutting the plum fruits into two halves had the greatest effect on
the drying rate, followed by the plums initial moisture content. The air temperature, the
relative humidity of the drying air and the plums sugar content had a remarkable effect.
The drying air velocity, the density of the plum fruits and the dipping time of the plum
fruits in water at 100oC had the least effect. Copyright © 2005 IFAC
52
3 5
the mathematical equations which could directly 1 5 5
determine the time needed for the drying process as a
function of the affecting factors on drying rate. This
2 4
was completely based on empirical data, and was 3
done by applying the multiple linear regression 6 8
analysis on all the data collected from the whole
experimental work of this research, in order to 7
9 5
express the required information as functions of all
the affecting factors on the drying process of fruits.
The derived mathematical equations covered all the
stages of the drying process, which was only the Fig. 1. Laboratory Set-up for Drying Experiments.
stage of the falling drying rate.
1. Flow-Channel Inlet. 2. Fan.
According to Bolin et al. (1975), Eissen et al. 3. Heating Elements. 4. Thermostat.
(1985a), Eissen et al. (1985b), Bains et al. (1989), 5. Measuring sensors. 6. Air flow rectifier.
Fohr & Arnaud (1992); Ibrahim (1994); Amer (1999) 7. Balance. 8. Fruit.
and Amer et al. (2003) there are many factors 9. Flow-channel outlet.
affecting the drying rate of the agricultural products.
The most affecting factors related to the drying air
are the drying air temperature, the drying air relative 2.1 The controlled affecting factors.
humidity and the drying air velocity as well as the
product initial moisture content. The temperature of the drying air. Many levels of
The majority of investigators recommended that the drying air temperature: between 20 and 70 ºC were
best range to be used for the drying air temperature tested, according to Hassan (1995). The air
for fruits is between 55 to 75°C, according to Hassan, temperature was measured by a thermocouple
(1995), and the best drying air velocity for fruits is transducer probe connected with a temperature
ranged between 6 to 72 (m/min), according to Eissen recorder with accuracy ± 0.1°C. The thermocouple
et al. (1985a). It is preferred to have the drying air was firstly used to measure the dry temperature of the
relative humidity at its lowest values from 10 to 20%, ambient air.
according to Bains et al. (1989). On the other hand, After heating the ambient air, the thermocouple was
the initial moisture content of the tested plum fruit also used for measuring the drying air temperature
variety Italian was found to be between 80 to 91% just before entering the drying tray in which the fruits
(wet basis). were placed for drying. Another digital instrument
The literature review revealed that there are many used also for measuring air temperature which was a
investigators studied the moisture ratio of grains “digital thermo-hygrometer” after connecting it with
“MR” as a function of the affecting factors, but there the temperature probe.
are just very few investigators studied the moisture
ratio or the drying rate of fruits and vegetables as a
The relative humidity of the drying air. Many levels
function of the affecting factors.
of the drying air relative humidity between 3% to
40% were tested, according to Bains et al. (1989).
The typical method for the determination of air
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
humidity was applied by the “digital thermo-
The selected fruit for the experimental work was hygrometer” with accuracy ± 1.5%.
plum, variety “Italian” for its great economical
importance in Egypt, according to CAPMS (1995). The air velocity of the drying air stream. Many
different levels of drying air velocity between 0.15
An experimental apparatus was designed and was and 0,35 m/s were tested; according to Eissen et al.
locally built in ATB for the determination of the (1985a). The velocity of the drying air stream was
effect of the different factors on the drying process. measured by using a digital instrument
This apparatus was designed as a thin-layer dryer for “Anemometer” after connecting it with the velocity
fruits and vegetables, Fig. 1. probe with accuracy ± 0.1 m/s.
The velocity of the drying air was measured just
Determination of fruit moisture loss and hence the before entering the drying tray.
determination of both fruit moisture content and fruit
drying rate could be done by weighing the drying
tray of the designed apparatus with its load of fruits 2.2 Determination for the moisture content of the
at successive periods of time, which are expected to plum fruits.
be short periods at the beginning of the test and
longer periods as the fruits lose more of its moisture. The moisture content, wet basis, of the fresh plum
fruit used in the experimental work was ranging
between 81% and 91%.
53
The original “initial” moisture content, dry basis, Table 1. Characteristics of whole fresh
“Mwo” of the fresh fruits was determined by the plum fruits “Italian”
vacuum oven drying method.
Characteristics Average Values
Samples of the fresh fruit of weight “Wo” were dried
in a vacuum oven at 70°C until the weight “Wd” of Fruit shape prelate
the dried sample became stable, according to Fruit weight 50 - 70 g
A.O.A.C. (1984). The moisture content, dry basis, Big diameter 2.7 – 3.1 cm
“Mwo” of the fresh fruit was expressed as: Small diameter 2.2 - 3 cm
Wo - Wd Fruit thickness 2.1 - 2.8 cm
Mw o = × 100 (%) (1). Fruit size 30 - 58 cm3
Wd Fruit density 1100 - 1300 kg/m3
Moisture content, wet basis, 81 - 91%(gw/gfresh)
For the determination of the moisture content, dry Dried material of the fruit, 15 – 9%(gdry /gfresh)
basis, “Mwi” of the fruit at any time “ti” during the
drying process, the following equation could be used: However, some of these characteristics were used in
Wi - Wd some of the calculations. As an example, the
Mw i = × 100 (%) (2). diameter of the fruits was used in calculating the
Wd actual velocity of the drying air passing through the
Where: inter spaces between plum fruits from the average air
Wi is the weight of the fruit at time ti velocity just beneath the drying tray.
The determination of the fruit weight was done by Also, in each conducted drying experiment, the fruits
weighing the drying tray with its load of fruits at any were taken for the determination of the initial
time during the drying process. moisture contents of the fresh fruits. After the
determination of the dried material of these fruits, the
moisture content (wet basis) was determined and the
2.3 Experimental work tested treatments. results are shown too in Table 1.
The experimental work included many drying
experiments. For all treatments, the whole weight of 3.2 Experimental work for drying plum fruits.
the drying tray was recorded periodically at time
intervals of 5 minutes at the first part of the drying It was proposed that the readings for the decreasing
process, where the drying rate is expected to be weight of the drying fruit correspondent to the
constant. At the next part of the drying process when passing time through the drying process are the main
the differences of the successive readings of drying important data in the many experiments which were
tray weight showed decreasing values. carried. From these data, the results dealing with the
During all the periods of the drying process, the loss of moisture, the new moisture content of the
values of the drying air affecting factors were drying fruit, and the instantaneous drying rate could
periodically checked to be very close to the same be all calculated and related to the time.
values chosen for the executed experiment.
Whenever any slight deviation occurred in any value,
the suitable adjustments were immediately done to 3.3 Determination of the effects of the affecting
maintain their values exactly as the assigned ones. factors on the drying process of plum.
54
By applying the multiple linear regression analysis
technique to the whole data of the many experiments 0.007
0.003
t = C + C1 (T) + C2 (RH) + C3 (u) + C4 (Mwo) + 0.002
C5 (ρ) + C6 (S) + C7 (Dp) + C8 (Ct) (3).
0.001
0
Where: 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
“t” is the total time of the drying process, (hr).
Drying time, (h)
“C” is the overall constant for the equation and its
value (-68.11).
Fig. 3. Effect of the air velocity on the drying rate
“C1” is the constant for the drying air temperature with a constant air temperature 60oC with the
(oC), and its value (-1.24)
same initial and final moisture content for plum
“C2” is the constant for the drying air relative
fruits.
humidity (%), and its value (0.59)
“C3” is the constant of the drying air velocity
(m/sec), and its value (-0.28) 0.0008
“C4” is the constant for the initial moisture Half fruit
content, wet basis for plum fruit (%), and its 0.0007
60°C
0.006 70°C finite differences technique since the drying air at
50°C
0.005 each location will have its specific temperature and
0.004 relative humidity which are determined by the
0.003 previous location. Also, at any location, the drying
0.002 air temperature and relative humidity will change
0.001
with the passing of time due to the continuous
0
decrease in the drying rate of the fruits in the
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 previous locations.
Drying time, (h)
So, at each location in the dryer, and at each time of
Fig. 2. Effect of the air temperature on the drying rate the drying process, the drying conditions have to be
of plum fruit with a constant air velocity 15 cm/s applied to determine the drop of fruit moisture
with the same initial and final moisture content content in this location. It is expected that the fruits
for plum fruits. in the first locations in the dryer will reach the
55
desired moisture content “MwF” at shorter periods of 5. LIST OF REFERENCES
time than those at the end of the dryer.
Amer, B. M. A. (1999). Determination Of Drying
Rate Of Fruits As A Function Of The Affecting
4. CONCLUSION Factors Under Conditions Suiting Solar Drying.
M.Sc. Thesis, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agic.,
1. Plum fruits, variety “Italian” could be dried with Cairo Univ., Egypt.
an accepted quality under controlling conditions
of air temperature ranges from 20 to 70°C, Amer, B. M. A.; Morcos, M. A. and Sabbah, M. A.
relative humidity ranges from 3 to 40% and air (2003). New method for the determination of
velocity ranges from 0.15 to 0,35 m/s. drying rates of fig fruits depending on empirical
data under conditions suiting solar drying. The
2. The initial moisture content of the fresh plum International Conference of New methods
fruits “Italian” (half and whole) is ranging from Means and Technologies for Applications of
81% to 91% (w.b.). The final accepted moisture Agricultural Products. Institute of Agricultural
content of the dried fruits is around 25% (w.b.). Engineering LUA Raudondvaris, Lithuania,
September 2003.
3. The results assured that the drying rate of plum
fruits is consisting of only one distinct period, A.O.A.C. (1984). Official Methods of Analysis of
which is: the falling drying rate-period. It was not the Association of Official Analytical Chemists’
noticed the constant drying rate during the drying 14 th Ed. Published by the Association of
process of the half plums fruit, but it was noticed Official Analytical Chemist s’, Arlington,
during the drying process of the whole fruit. Virginia, 22209 USA.
4. The total drying time of plum fruits “Italian” Bains, M. S., Ramaswamy, H. S. and Lo, K. V.
treatments for the half fruits from 70 to 20°C (1989). Tray drying of apple puree. J. of Food
respectively ranged from 50 to 150 h, and ranged Eng., 9 (3): 195-201.
from 200 to 500 h for the whole fruits at the same
range of the drying air temperature. Bolin, H. R. ; Petruccia, V. and Fuller, G. (1975).
Characteristics of mechanically harvested raisins
5. The air temperature and air humidity were stable produced by dehydration and by field drying. J.
in the most of period for each experiment. Food Sci., 40: 1036-1038.
6. The results showed that the cutting the plum Central Agency for Public Mobilization and
fruits for two halves had the greatest effect on the Statistics “CAPMS”. (1995). Statistical Year
drying rate of plum fruits, followed by the initial Book, (Arabic reference).
moisture content of plum fruits. The drying air
temperature, the relative humidity of the drying Eissen, W., Muhlbauer, W. and Kutzbach, H. D.
air and sugar content for plum fruits had a (1985 a). Solar drying of grapes. Drying Tech.,
remarkable effect. The drying air velocity, the 3 (1): 63-74.
density of the plum fruits and. the dipping time of Eissen, W., Muhlbauer, W. and Kutzbach, H. D.
the plum fruits in boiling water at 100oC had the (1985 b). Influence of drying air temperature, air
least effect. velocity and chemical pre-treatment on drying
behavior of grapes. Grundlagen-der-Landtechnik
7. The drying rate for the half fruit was more than (Germany), 35 (2): 33-39.
for the whole fruit.
Fohr, J. P. and Arnaud, G. (1992). Grape drying :
8. Drying plums at 70°C is not good because the from sample behavior to the dryer project.
sugar inside the fruits have been crystallizing Drying Tech., 10 (2): 445-456.
and cause to decrease the drying rate.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United
9. It was found that the best condition for drying Nations, “FAO”, (2004).
plum fruit is drying at air temperature of 60°C
with low relative humidity of 4-7 %, air velocity Hassan, F. R. H. (1995). Chemical and technological
between 0.35 m/s. Also, it was found that dipping studies on fruit drying of some fig cultivars.
the plum fruit in boiling water at 100oC for 180 M.Sc. Thesis, Food Science and Technology.
seconds is very important to scratch its skin for Dept., Faculty of Agri., Cairo Univ., Egypt.
increasing the drying rate.
Ibrahim, H. I. K. (1994). Thermal process evaluation
of heat dehydration of some fruits and
vegetables. Ph.D. Thesis, Food Sci. Dept.,
Faculty of Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Egypt.
56