Standard Costs and Variances
Chapter 10
PowerPoint Authors:
Susan Coomer Galbreath, Ph.D., CPA
Charles W. Caldwell, D.B.A., CMA
Jon A. Booker, Ph.D., CPA, CIA
Cynthia J. Rooney, Ph.D., CPA
Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
10-2
Standard Costs
Standards are benchmarks or “norms” for
measuring performance. In managerial accounting,
two types of standards are commonly used.
Quantity standards Price standards
specify how much of an specify how much
input should be used to should be paid for
make a product or each unit of the
provide a service. input.
Examples: Firestone, Sears, McDonald’s, hospitals,
construction, and manufacturing companies.
10-3
Standard Costs
Deviations from standards deemed significant
are brought to the attention of management, a
practice known as management by exception.
Standard
Amount
Direct
Material
Direct Manufacturing
Labor Overhead
Type of Product Cost
10-4
Variance Analysis Cycle
10-5
Setting Standard Costs
Should we use I recommend using practical
ideal standards that standards that are currently
require employees to attainable with reasonable
work at 100 percent and efficient effort.
peak efficiency?
Engineer Managerial Accountant
10-6
Setting Direct Materials Standards
Standard Price Standard Quantity
per Unit per Unit
Final, delivered Summarized in
cost of materials, a Bill of Materials.
net of discounts.
10-7
Setting Direct Labor Standards
Standard Rate Standard Hours
per Hour per Unit
Often a single Use time and
rate is used that reflects motion studies for
the mix of wages earned. each labor operation.
10-8
Setting Variable Manufacturing
Overhead Standards
Price Quantity
Standard Standard
The rate is the The quantity is
variable portion of the the activity in the
predetermined overhead allocation base for
rate. predetermined overhead.
10-9
The Standard Cost Card
A standard cost card for one unit of
product might look like this:
A B AxB
Standard Standard Standard
Quantity Price Cost
Inputs or Hours or Rate per Unit
Direct materials 3.0 lbs. $ 4.00 per lb. $ 12.00
Direct labor 2.5 hours 14.00 per hour 35.00
Variable mfg. overhead 2.5 hours 3.00 per hour 7.50
Total standard unit cost $ 54.50
10-10
Using Standards in Flexible Budgets
Standard costs per unit for direct materials, direct
labor, and variable manufacturing overhead can be
used to compute activity and spending variances.
Spending variances become more
useful by breaking them down into
quantity and price variances.
10-11
A General Model for Variance Analysis
Variance Analysis
Quantity Variance Price Variance
Difference between Difference between
actual quantity and actual price and
standard quantity standard price
10-12
Quantity and Price Standards
Quantity and price standards are
determined separately for two reasons:
The purchasing manager is responsible for raw
material purchase prices and the production manager
is responsible for the quantity of raw material used.
The buying and using activities occur at different times.
Raw material purchases may be held in inventory for a
period of time before being used in production.
10-13
A General Model for Variance Analysis
Variance Analysis
Quantity Variance Price Variance
Materials quantity variance Materials price variance
Labor efficiency variance Labor rate variance
VOH efficiency variance VOH rate variance
Material Cost Variance
10-14
Material Cost Actual Cost – Standard Cost
Variance or (AQ × AP) – (SQ × SP)
Material Price Actual Cost – Standard Cost of Actual Quantity*
Variance or (AP × AQ) – (SP × AQ)
or AQ × (AP – SP)
Material Standard Cost of AQ – Standard Cost of SQ for Actual Production
Quantity/Usage or (AQ × SP) – (SQ × SP)
Variance or SP × (AQ – SQ)
10-15
A General Model for Variance Analysis
(1) (2) (3)
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output, of Input, of Input,
at Standard Price at Standard Price at Actual Price
(SQ × SP) (AQ × SP) (AQ × AP)
Quantity Variance Price Variance
(2) – (1) (3) – (2)
Spending Variance
(3) – (1)
10-16
A General Model for Variance Analysis
Actual quantity is the amount of direct materials, direct
labor, and variable manufacturing overhead actually used.
(1) (2) (3)
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output, of Input, of Input,
at Standard Price at Standard Price at Actual Price
(SQ × SP) (AQ × SP) (AQ × AP)
Quantity Variance Price Variance
(2) – (1) (3) – (2)
Spending Variance
(3) – (1)
10-17
A General Model for Variance Analysis
Standard quantity is the standard quantity allowed
for the actual output of the period.
(1) (2) (3)
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output, of Input, of Input,
at Standard Price at Standard Price at Actual Price
(SQ × SP) (AQ × SP) (AQ × AP)
Quantity Variance Price Variance
(2) – (1) (3) – (2)
Spending Variance
(3) – (1)
10-18
A General Model for Variance Analysis
Actual price is the amount actually
paid for the input used.
(1) (2) (3)
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output, of Input, of Input,
at Standard Price at Standard Price at Actual Price
(SQ × SP) (AQ × SP) (AQ × AP)
Quantity Variance Price Variance
(2) – (1) (3) – (2)
Spending Variance
(3) – (1)
10-19
A General Model for Variance Analysis
Standard price is the amount that should
have been paid for the input used.
(1) (2) (3)
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
Allowed for Actual Output, of Input, of Input,
at Standard Price at Standard Price at Actual Price
(SQ × SP) (AQ × SP) (AQ × AP)
Quantity Variance Price Variance
(2) – (1) (3) – (2)
Spending Variance
(3) – (1)
10-20
Learning Objective 1
Compute the direct
materials quantity and
price variances and
explain their
significance.
10-21
Materials Variances – An Example
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct
materials standard for the fiberfill in its mountain
parka.
0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per kg.
Last month 210 kgs. of fiberfill were purchased and
used to make 2,000 parkas. The materials cost a
total of $1,029.
10-22
Materials Variances Summary
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
× × ×
Standard Price Standard Price Actual Price
200 kgs. 210 kgs. 210 kgs.
× × ×
$5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $4.90 per kg.
= $1,000 = $1,050 = $1,029
Quantity variance Price variance
$50 unfavorable $21 favorable
10-23
Materials Variances Summary
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
× × ×
Standard Price Standard Price Actual Price
200 kgs. 210 kgs. 210 kgs.
0.1 kg per parka 2,000 parkas
× × ×
= 200 kgs
$5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $4.90 per kg.
= $1,000 = $1,050 = $1,029
Quantity variance Price variance
$50 unfavorable $21 favorable
10-24
Materials Variances Summary
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
× × ×
Standard Price Standard Price Actual Price
200 kgs. 210 kgs. 210 kgs.
× × 210 kgs
$1,029 ×
$5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.
= $4.90 per kg $4.90 per kg.
= $1,000 = $1,050 = $1,029
Quantity variance Price variance
$50 unfavorable $21 favorable
10-25
Materials Variances:
Using the Factored Equations
Materials quantity variance
MQV = (AQ × SP) – (SQ × SP)
= SP(AQ – SQ)
= $5.00/kg (210 kgs – (0.1 kg/parka 2,000 parkas))
= $5.00/kg (210 kgs – 200 kgs)
= $5.00/kg (10 kgs) = $50 U
Materials price variance
MPV = (AQ × AP) – (AQ × SP)
= AQ(AP – SP)
= 210 kgs ($4.90/kg – $5.00/kg)
= 210 kgs (– $0.10/kg) = $21 F
10-26
Responsibility for Materials
Variances
Materials Quantity Variance Materials Price Variance
Production Manager Purchasing Manager
The standard price is used to compute the quantity variance
so that the production manager is not held responsible for
the purchasing manager’s performance.
10-27
Responsibility for Materials Variances
Your poor scheduling
I am not responsible for sometimes requires me to
this unfavorable materials rush order materials at a
quantity variance. higher price, causing
You purchased cheap unfavorable price variances.
material, so my people
had to use more of it.
Production Manager Purchasing Manager
10-28
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson Inc. has the following direct materials
standard to manufacture one Zippy:
1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per pound
Last week, 1,700 pounds of materials were
purchased and used to make 1,000 Zippies. The
materials cost a total of $6,630.
10-29
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
How many pounds of materials should
Hanson have used to make 1,000 Zippies?
a. 1,700 pounds.
b. 1,500 pounds.
c. 1,200 pounds.
d. 1,000 pounds.
10-30
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
How many pounds of materials should
Hanson have used to make 1,000 Zippies?
a. 1,700 pounds.
b. 1,500 pounds.
c. 1,200 pounds.
d. 1,000 pounds. The standard quantity is:
1,000 × 1.5 pounds per Zippy.
10-31
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s materials quantity variance (MQV)
for the week was:
a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.
d. $800 favorable.
10-32
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s materials quantity variance (MQV)
for the week was:
a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.
d. $800 favorable.
MQV = SP(AQ - SQ)
MQV = $4.00(1,700 lbs - 1,500 lbs)
MQV = $800 unfavorable
10-33
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s materials price variance (MPV)
for the week was:
a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.
d. $800 favorable.
10-34
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s materials price variance (MPV)
for the week was:
a. $170 unfavorable.
b. $170 favorable.
c. $800 unfavorable.
d. $800 favorable. MPV = AQ(AP - SP)
MPV = 1,700 lbs. × ($3.90 - 4.00)
MPV = $170 Favorable
10-35
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
× × ×
Standard Price Standard Price Actual Price
1,500 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs.
× × ×
$4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $3.90 per lb.
= $6,000 = $ 6,800 = $6,630
Quantity variance Price variance
$800 unfavorable $170 favorable
10-36
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Recall that the standard quantity for 1,000 Zippies
is 1,000 × 1.5 pounds per Zippy = 1,500 pounds.
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
× × ×
Standard Price Standard Price Actual Price
1,500 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs.
× × ×
$4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $3.90 per lb.
= $6,000 = $ 6,800 = $6,630
Quantity variance Price variance
$800 unfavorable $170 favorable
10-37
Learning Objective 2
Compute the direct labor
efficiency and rate
variances and explain
their significance.
Labour Cost Variance 10-38
Labour Cost Actual Cost – Standard Cost
Variance or (AH × AR) – (SH × SR)
Labour Rate Actual Cost – Standard Cost of Actual Quantity*
Variance or (AR × AH) – (SR × AH)
or AHpaid × (AR – SR)
Labour Efficiency Standard Cost of AH – Standard Cost of SH for Actual Production
Variance or (AH × SR) – (SH × SR)
or SR × (AHworked – SH)
10-39
Labor Variances – An Example
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct
labor standard for its mountain parka.
1.2 standard hours per parka at $10.00 per hour
Last month, employees actually worked 2,500
hours at a total labor cost of $26,250 to make
2,000 parkas.
10-40
Labor Variances Summary
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours
× × ×
$10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour $10.50 per hour
= $24,000 = $25,000 = $26,250
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$1,000 unfavorable $1,250 unfavorable
10-41
Labor Variances Summary
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours
× 1.2 hours×per parka 2,000 ×
$10.00 per hour parkasper
$10.00 = 2,400
hour hours$10.50 per hour
= $24,000 = $25,000 = $26,250
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$1,000 unfavorable $1,250 unfavorable
10-42
Labor Variances Summary
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours
× × hours
$26,250 2,500 ×
$10.00 per hour = $10.50
$10.00per
perhour
hour $10.50 per hour
= $24,000 = $25,000 = $26,250
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$1,000 unfavorable $1,250 unfavorable
10-43
Labor Variances: Using the
Factored Equations
Labor efficiency variance
LEV = (AH × SR) – (SH × SR)
= SR (AH – SH)
= $10.00 per hour (2,500 hours – 2,400 hours)
= $10.00 per hour (100 hours)
= $1,000 unfavorable
Labor rate variance
LRV = (AH × AR) – (AH × SR)
= AH (AR – SR)
= 2,500 hours ($10.50 per hour – $10.00 per hour)
= 2,500 hours ($0.50 per hour)
= $1,250 unfavorable
10-44
Responsibility for Labor Variances
Production managers are Mix of skill levels
usually held accountable assigned to work tasks.
for labor variances
because they can
Level of employee
influence the:
motivation.
Quality of production
supervision.
Quality of training
provided to employees.
Production Manager
10-45
Responsibility for Labor Variances
I think it took more time
to process the
I am not responsible for materials because the
the unfavorable labor Maintenance
efficiency variance! Department has poorly
maintained your
You purchased cheap equipment.
material, so it took more
time to process it.
10-46
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson Inc. has the following direct labor
standard to manufacture one Zippy:
1.5 standard hours per Zippy at
$12.00 per direct labor hour
Last week, 1,550 direct labor hours were
worked at a total labor cost of $18,910
to make 1,000 Zippies.
10-47
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV)
for the week was:
a. $590 unfavorable.
b. $590 favorable.
c. $600 unfavorable.
d. $600 favorable.
10-48
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV)
for the week was:
a. $590 unfavorable.
b. $590 favorable.
c. $600 unfavorable.
d. $600 favorable.
LEV = SR(AH - SH)
LEV = $12.00(1,550 hrs - 1,500 hrs)
LEV = $600 unfavorable
10-49
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the
week was:
a. $310 unfavorable.
b. $310 favorable.
c. $300 unfavorable.
d. $300 favorable.
10-50
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the
week was:
a. $310 unfavorable.
b. $310 favorable.
LRV = AH(AR - SR)
c. $300 unfavorable.
LRV = 1,550 hrs($12.20 - $12.00)
d. $300 favorable.LRV = $310 unfavorable
10-51
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
1,500 hours 1,550 hours 1,550 hours
× × ×
$12.00 per hour $12.00 per hour $12.20 per hour
= $18,000 = $18,600 = $18,910
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$600 unfavorable $310 unfavorable
10-52
Learning Objective 3
Compute the variable
manufacturing overhead
efficiency and rate
variances and explain
their significance.
10-53
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances – An Example
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct
variable manufacturing overhead labor standard
for its mountain parka.
1.2 standard hours per parka at $4.00 per hour
Last month, employees actually worked 2,500
hours to make 2,000 parkas. Actual variable
manufacturing overhead for the month was
$10,500.
10-54
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances Summary
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours
× × ×
$4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.20 per hour
= $9,600 = $10,000 = $10,500
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$400 unfavorable $500 unfavorable
10-55
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances Summary
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours
× 1.2 hours×per parka 2,000 ×
$4.00 per hour $4.00 per
parkas hour hours $4.20 per hour
= 2,400
= $9,600 = $10,000 = $10,500
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$400 unfavorable $500 unfavorable
10-56
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances Summary
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
2,400 hours 2,500 hours 2,500 hours
× ×
$10,500 2,500 hours ×
$4.00 per hour $4.00 per
= $4.20 per hour
hour $4.20 per hour
= $9,600 = $10,000 = $10,500
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$400 unfavorable $500 unfavorable
10-57
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Variances: Using Factored Equations
Variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance
VMEV = (AH × SR) – (SH – SR)
= SR (AH – SH)
= $4.00 per hour (2,500 hours – 2,400 hours)
= $4.00 per hour (100 hours)
= $400 unfavorable
Variable manufacturing overhead rate variance
VMRV = (AH × AR) – (AH – SR)
= AH (AR – SR)
= 2,500 hours ($4.20 per hour – $4.00 per hour)
= 2,500 hours ($0.20 per hour)
= $500 unfavorable
10-58
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson Inc. has the following variable
manufacturing overhead standard to
manufacture one Zippy:
1.5 standard hours per Zippy at
$3.00 per direct labor hour
Last week, 1,550 hours were worked to make
1,000 Zippies, and $5,115 was spent for
variable manufacturing overhead.
10-59
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s efficiency variance (VMEV) for
variable manufacturing overhead for the week
was:
a. $435 unfavorable.
b. $435 favorable.
c. $150 unfavorable.
d. $150 favorable.
10-60
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s efficiency variance (VMEV) for
variable manufacturing overhead for the week
was:
a. $435 unfavorable.
b. $435 favorable. 1,000 units × 1.5 hrs per unit
c. $150 unfavorable.
d. $150 favorable.
VMEV = SR(AH - SH)
VMEV = $3.00(1,550 hrs - 1,500 hrs)
VMEV = $150 unfavorable
10-61
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s rate variance (VMRV) for variable
manufacturing overhead for the week was:
a. $465 unfavorable.
b. $400 favorable.
c. $335 unfavorable.
d. $300 favorable.
10-62
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Hanson’s rate variance (VMRV) for variable
manufacturing overhead for the week was:
a. $465 unfavorable.
b. $400 favorable.
VMRV = AH(AR - SR)
c. $335 unfavorable.
VMRV = 1,550 hrs($3.30 - $3.00)
d. $300 favorable. VMRV = $465 unfavorable
10-63
Quick Check ✓ Zippy
Standard Hours Actual Hours Actual Hours
× × ×
Standard Rate Standard Rate Actual Rate
1,500 hours 1,550 hours 1,550 hours
× × ×
$3.00 per hour $3.00 per hour $3.30 per hour
= $4,500 = $4,650 = $5,115
Efficiency variance Rate variance
$150 unfavorable $465 unfavorable
10-64
Materials Variances―An Important
Subtlety
The quantity variance
is computed only on
the quantity used.
The price variance is
computed on the entire
quantity purchased.
10-65
Materials Variances―An Important
Subtlety
Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct
materials standard for the fiberfill in its mountain
parka.
0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per kg.
Last month 210 kgs. of fiberfill were purchased at a
cost of $1,029. Glacier used 200 kgs. to make
2,000 parkas.
10-66
Materials Variances―An Important
Subtlety
Standard Quantity Actual Quantity
× ×
Standard Price Standard Price
200 kgs. 200 kgs.
× ×
$5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.
= $1,000 = $1,000
Quantity variance
$0
10-67
Materials Variances―An Important
Subtlety
Actual Quantity Actual Quantity
× ×
Standard Price Actual Price
210 kgs. 210 kgs.
× ×
$5.00 per kg. $4.90 per kg.
= $1,050 = $1,029
Price variance
$21 favorable
10-68
Variance Analysis and Management
by Exception
Larger variances, in
How do I know dollar amount or as
which variances to a percentage of the
investigate? standard, are
investigated first.
10-69
A Statistical Control Chart
Warning signals for investigation
Favorable Limit
• •
• • •
Desired Value
• •
Unfavorable Limit •
•
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Variance Measurements
10-70
Material Cost Variance
10-71
Material Cost Actual Cost – Standard Cost of Actual Output/Production
Variance or (AQ × AP) – (SQ × SP)
Material Price Actual Cost – Standard Cost of Actual Quantity*
Variance or (AP × AQ) – (SP × AQ)
or AQ × (AP – SP)
Material Standard Cost of AQ – Standard Cost of SQ for Actual Production
Quantity/Usage or (AQ × SP) – (SQ × SP)
Variance or SP × (AQ – SQ)
Material Mix Standard Cost of AQ - Standard Cost of AQ in Standard Proportion
Variance or (AQ × SP) – (RSQ × SP)
or SP × [AQ - Revised Std. Quantity (RSQ)]
Material Yield Standard Cost of AQ in standard proportion – Standard Cost of SQ
Variance for Actual Production
or (RSQ × SP) – (SQ × SP)
or SP × [Revised Standard Quantity (RSQ) – SQ]
Verification of the formulae:
Material Cost Variance = Material Usage Variance + Material Price Variance*
or, Material Cost Variance = (Material Mix Variance + Material Revised usage
Variance) + Material price variance
Ques:
10-72
The standard cost of a chemical mixture is as follows:
9
40% material A at ₹ 20 per kg
60% material B at ₹ 30 per kg
A standard loss of 10% of input is expected in production.
The cost records for a period showed the following usage:
90 kg material A at a cost of ₹18 per kg
110 kg material B at a cost of` ₹34 per kg
The quantity produced was 182 kg of good product.
CALCULATE
(a) Material cost variance,
(b) Material price variance,
(c) Material usage variance.
10-73
10-74
Sol.:
Ques:
10-75
CALCULATE the following variances:
(i) Material price variance (ii) Material usage variance (iii) Material yield variance
(iv) Material mix variance (v) Total Material cost variance
10-76
(v) Total material cost variance
= Std. cost for actual output – Actual cost
= 6,800 – 6,513.75 = 286.25 (F)
Check
MCV = MPV + MUV
286.25 (F) = 376.25 (F) + 90 (A)
10-77
Labour Cost Variance 10-78
Labour Cost Actual Cost – Standard Cost
Variance or (AHpaid × AR) – (SH × SR)
Labour Rate Actual Cost – Standard Cost of Actual Quantity*
Variance or (AR × AH) – (SR × AH)
or AHpaid × (AR – SR)
Labour Efficiency Standard Cost of AH – Standard Cost of SH for Actual Production
Variance or (AH × SR) – (SH × SR)
or SR × (AHworked – SH)
Labour Mix / Gang Standard Cost of AH - Standard Cost of AT in Standard Proportion
Variance or (AH × SR) – (Revised Standard Hours × SR)
or SR × (AHworked - RSH)
Labour Yield / Standard Cost of AT in standard proportion – Standard Cost of ST for
Labour Revised Actual Production
Efficiency or (RSH × SR) – (SH × SR)
Variance or SR × (RSH – SH)
Idle Time Variance Standard Rate per Hour × Actual Idle Hours
or (AHpaid x SR) – (AHworked x SR)
or SR x (AHpaid – AHworked)
Verification of formulae:
Labour Cost Variance = Labour Rate Variance + Labour Efficiency Variance (if hours paid = hrs worked)
OR Labour Cost Variance = Labour Rate Variance + Labour Efficiency Variance + Idle Time Variance
OR Labour Efficiency Variance = Labour Mix Variance + Labour Yield Variance
Ques:
10-79
Ques:
10-80
10-81
Ques:
10-82
10-83
10-84
10-90
Advantages of Standard Costs
Management by Promotes economy
exception and efficiency
Advantages
Enhances
Simplified responsibility
bookkeeping accounting
10-91
Potential Problems with Standard Costs
Emphasizing standards Favorable
may exclude other variances may
important objectives. be misinterpreted.
Potential
Problems
Standard cost Emphasis on
reports may negative may
not be timely. impact morale.
Invalid assumptions Continuous
about the relationship improvement may
between labor be more important
cost and output. than meeting standards.