Discourse Paper on Duterte's War on Drugs
Introduction
The war on drugs initiated by former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has been a significant and
controversial aspect of his administration. This discourse paper aims to analyze the key elements of
Duterte's approach to drug-related issues, particularly as articulated in his speech during the destruction
of dangerous drugs. The objectives of this paper include examining the rhetoric used by Duterte, the
implications of his policies, and the broader societal impact of the war on drugs.
Objectives
To analyze the rhetoric employed by President Duterte in his speeches regarding the war on drugs.
To assess the implications of Duterte's policies on drug users and the general population.
To explore the societal impact of the war on drugs, including public perception and international
response.
Purpose
The purpose of this discourse paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of Duterte's war on drugs,
focusing on the language and strategies used to justify the campaign. By examining the speech delivered
during the destruction of dangerous drugs, insights into the administration's stance on drug-related
issues can be gained, along with an understanding of the consequences faced by various stakeholders.
Background of the War on Drugs
Upon taking office in June 2016, President Duterte launched a nationwide campaign aimed at eradicating
illegal drugs. This campaign, often referred to as "tokhang," has been characterized by aggressive law
enforcement tactics, including extrajudicial killings. The administration framed the drug problem as a
national crisis, necessitating immediate and severe action.
Key Themes in Duterte's Speech
Rhetoric of Destruction
In his speech during the destruction of dangerous drugs, Duterte emphasized the determination of his
administration to combat the drug menace. The act of destroying seized drugs was portrayed as a
symbolic gesture of commitment to public safety. Key phrases from the speech highlighted the urgency
of the situation, with Duterte stating that drug abuse leads to societal decay.
Framing of Drug Users
Duterte's rhetoric often framed drug users as threats to society. The language used suggested that drug
users were not merely individuals struggling with addiction but were depicted as criminals undermining
the fabric of the nation. This framing served to justify the harsh measures implemented during the
campaign.
Justification of Extrajudicial Actions
The speech also provided a rationale for the extrajudicial killings associated with the war on drugs.
Duterte argued that these actions were necessary to protect the youth and future generations from the
dangers of drug abuse. This justification has been met with significant criticism from human rights
advocates, who argue that such measures violate fundamental rights.
Societal Impact
Public Perception
The war on drugs has polarized public opinion in the Philippines. Supporters of Duterte's policies argue
that the campaign has led to a decrease in crime rates and a safer environment. Conversely, critics
highlight the human rights violations and the loss of innocent lives as a result of the campaign.
International Response
The international community has responded with concern regarding the human rights implications of
Duterte's war on drugs. Various organizations have called for investigations into the extrajudicial killings
and have urged the Philippine government to adhere to international human rights standards.
Conclusion
Duterte's war on drugs represents a complex interplay of rhetoric, policy, and societal impact. The
speech delivered during the destruction of dangerous drugs encapsulates the administration's approach
to addressing the drug crisis in the Philippines. By analyzing the themes and implications of this
discourse, a clearer understanding of the war on drugs and its consequences can be achieved. The
ongoing debate surrounding this issue underscores the need for a balanced approach that considers
both public safety and human rights.
