Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views7 pages

Central Force Motion Analysis

Uploaded by

elend123venture
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views7 pages

Central Force Motion Analysis

Uploaded by

elend123venture
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Central forces

AK

A. Equation of motion such that


F⃗ = −∇V
⃗ (r) ≡ −∂r V (r)r̂. (5)
• Consider a particle of mass m is subjected to a
force which is only a function of the distance of the Thus, these forces are conservative.
particle from a origin and is along the line joining
• Lets formulate the whole problem in polar coordi-
the particle and the origin. This means, in polar
nates. From the earlier classes, we know
coordinate, the force is    
⃗r¨ = r̈ − rϕ̇2 r̂ + rϕ̈ + 2ṙϕ̇ . (6)
m⃗r¨ = F⃗ = F (r)r̂.
Thus, we can write the second law of Newton as
Let is consider the angular momentum of the par-
⃗ = ⃗r × (m⃗r˙ ).
   
ticle: L m r̈ − rϕ̇2 r̂ + m rϕ̈ + 2ṙϕ̇ = −∂r V (r)r̂. (7)

dL
= m⃗r˙ × ⃗r˙ + ⃗r × (m⃗r¨) • Lets take a dot product of ϕ̂ of the above equation
dt on both sides. This imples,
= ⃗r × F⃗ = F (r)⃗r × r̂ = 0. (1)
rϕ̈ + 2ṙϕ̇ = 0,
Thus, the angular momentum is dynamically con- 1 2 

stant, i.e, dL/dt = 0. ⇒ r ϕ̈ + 2rṙϕ̇ = 0,
r
• We also know that, d  2 
⇒ r ϕ̇ = 0. (8)
dt
⃗ = m⃗r · (⃗r × ⃗r˙ ) = 0.
⃗r · L (2) The last equation is infact the same as the angular
momentum conservation, Eq. (1). To see this, lets
Eq. (1)also means that, L̂ direction remains con- write the angular momentum in the polar coordi-
stant throughout the motion and Eq. (2) implies nate,
that the motion of the particle at any point of time
is in a plane perpendicular to the direction L̂. Thus, ⃗
L
= ⃗r × ⃗r˙ = rr̂ × (ṙr̂ + rϕ̇ϕ̂) = (r2 ϕ̇) ẑ. (9)
in many cases it is useful to describe such motion m
using 2D polar coordinates.
Here we used ⃗r˙ = ṙr̂ + rϕ̇ϕ̂, and the fact that r̂ ×
• An interlude: gradient in 2D polar coordinate. ϕ̂ = ẑ. Thus, the angular momentum L ⃗ is indeed
Consider a function in two dimension, f (x, y). We constant and along the perpendicular direction ẑ,
can equivalently write f as a function of r, ϕ, where with an amplitude
x = r cos ϕ and y = r sin ϕ. Further,
L = mr2 ϕ̇.
df = ∂x f dx + ∂y f dy.
• Now, lets take a dot product of r̂ with both sides
This implies df = ∇f⃗ ·d⃗r, with ∇f ˆ
⃗ = ∂x f x̂+∂y f dy of Eq. (7), to arrive at
ˆ Equivalently, we want to write,
and d⃗r = xx̂ + y dy. mr̈ − mrϕ̇2 = −∂r V.
2
⃗ · d⃗r,

df = ∂r f dr + ∂ϕ f dϕ = ∇f L
⇒ mr̈ − mr = −∂r V.
mr2
where (from last class) d⃗r = drr̂ + rdϕϕ̂, this im-
L2
 2 
L
plies, in the polar coordinates, ⇒ mr̈ = − ∂r V = −∂r + V (r) .
mr3 2mr2
⃗ = ∂r f r̂ + 1 ∂ϕ f ϕ̂.
∇f (3) Thus, the equation of motion simply looks like
r
mr̈ = −∂r Veff (r), L = mr2 ϕ̇ = const., (10)
• The above means that, for any central force, which
L2
a function of only r, we can always define a poten- with Veff (r) = + V (r). (11)
tial, 2mr2
Z r This reduces the whole problem (originally in three
V (r) = − F (r)dr, (4) dimensions), in an one-dimensional problem of an
effective potential Veff !
2

• If the energy E is such that V (0) > E as well as


V (r → ∞) > E, then the particle can be orbit-
ing the origin forever, and we call such trajectories
bounded orbits.
• Further, if the Veff has a single minimum and E is
such that E = Veff (r1 ) = Veff (r2 ), then the motion
is bounded between r = r1 and r = r2 , see Fig. 1
for example. An example would be an ellipse. The
angles ϕ between successive r = r1 and r = r2 will
appear are called apsidal angles. An illustration is
in Fig. 2.

1. An example
FIG. 1. Energy E is such that the orbit is bounded between
r = r1 and r = r2 .
Lets take an example of inverse-square law, that is
when V (r) = −α/r. Thus
α L2
Veff = − + .
r 2mr2

From Veff (r) = 0, easy to see that, the minimum of the
Veff is at r0 = L2 /km, and Veff (r0 ) = −α2 m2 /2L2 . Now,
few things can happen.
• When E = Veff (r0 ) = −α2 m2 /2L2 , we simply have
ṙ = 0. That is r = r0 ! This is an equation of circle!
So, the orbit will be circular.
• When E > Veff (r0 ) but E < 0. In this case the
particle orbits is between two values of the radius
r1 and r2 (at which Veff (r) = E, and ṙ = 0). We
shall see later the motion traes an ellipse.
The smallest value of r = r1 is called the periapsis
(for motion around the Sun, we call them perihe-
FIG. 2. For this orbit, the apsidal angle is π/4. lion). The largest r = r2 is called the apoapsis (for
motion around the Sun, they are called aphelion).
Together they are called apsides.
• What about energy? We expect that, from the
above 1D problem E should be equal to 12 mṙ2 + • When E > 0, then the particle will be unbounded.
Veff (r). Lets see this explicitly. From earlier class That is, the particle comes from infinity, reaches a
minimum distance r, when Veff (r) = E, and then
1 it again goes back to infinity. This is what is called
E = mv 2 + V (r), a scattering process.
2
1 What about the stability of the circular orbit, when
= m(ṙ2 + r2 ϕ̇2 ) + V (r),
2 E = Veff (r0 ), i.e, is the particle is going to remain mostly
2
around the circular orbit if a small perturbation is given.

1 2 1 2 L
= mṙ + mr + V (r) This is the same question as asking whether at r = r0 ,
2 2 mr2
Veff has a minimum or maximum. Consider, V (r) =
1 L2 −α/r2 . Then,
= mṙ2 + + V (r) ≡ Veff (r). (12)
2 2mr2
′ nα L2 nα L2
Thus, if the energy is known, then another way to Veff (r) = − = 0 ⇒ n−2 = . (15)
rn+1 mr3 r0 m
solve for the motion of the particle is by using the
following two equations Then
′′ n(n + 1)α 3L2
1 2 Veff (r0 ) = − + ,
mṙ + Veff (r) = E, L = mr2 ϕ̇ = const., (13) n+2
r0 mr04
2
L2 n + 1 L2 3L2 L2
with Veff (r) = + V (r). (14) =− 4 + 4 = (2 − n). (16)
2mr2 r0 m mr0 mr04
3

′′
Thus, Veff (r0 ) > 0 as long as n < 2. This imples
(1 + a2 )L2
V (r) = − + const.
2. Orbit equation 2mr2

• We also can do little more maths as followin: 3. Bertrand’s theorem (1873)


 2  2
1 2 1 dr 1 L dr
mṙ = m ϕ̇ = m = E − Veff ,
2 2 dϕ 2 mr2 dϕ Only two kinds of central forces, the attractive lin-
2
ear and the inverse-square, can result in closed, if

1 dr 2m
⇒ = 2 (E − Veff (r)) . (17) bounded, orbits.
r2 dϕ L
This equation, in principle, allows us to obtain how Closed orbits are orbits in which the particle eventually
r depends on ϕ, thus allowing us to know the full retraces its own footsteps. One example of closed orbit
trajectory of a particle. Using a new variable u = is a circle. This happens if the energy of the particle
1/r, the equation can also be written as E is such that E = Veff (r0 ), where r0 is a minima of

 2    the potential, that is Veff (r0 ) = 0. Then the motion is
du 2m 1 possible only with r = r0 and with ṙ = 0.
= 2 E − Veff . (18)
dϕ L u To have the orbit such that particle retraces its own
path, it is important to understand that the apsidal an-
• The same equation can be also cast in the following gle ϕA need to be constants. If an orbit is closed after
way: some M revolutions so that r(ϕ + 2πM ) = r(ϕ), then an
 2
1 ∗ du integral number N periods of the radial oscillation must
m + Ṽ (u) = E, (19) fit at the same point, thus 2ϕA N = 2πM , or
2 dϕ
π
ϕA = , (20)
where m∗ = L2 /m and Ṽ (u) = Veff u1 = 21 m∗ u2 +

R
V u1 . where R must be a rational number.
Let us explore this for an orbit, which is nearly circu-
lar. Below, we follow Ref. [1] and [2]. Let us remember
Eq. (19):
 2
1 ∗ du 1
m + m∗ u2 + V (u−1 ) = E, (21)
2 dϕ 2
where the first two terms are like a simple-harmonic
oscillator’s kinetic and potential energy, with the time
replaced by u, and V (u−1 ) is like a perturbation. If
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 V (u−1 ) is also of quadratic in u, then the net poten-
tial is 12 m∗ u2 + V (u−1 ) = 12 γu2 , and the solution would
be of the form u ∝ cos(ωϕ + ϕ0 ), with ω 2 = γ/m∗ . In
this case the condition for closed orbit is that ω needs to
be rational.
Now, the key point is, for almost any kind of potential,
the potential can be approximated to be ∝ u2 , near its
extreme (minimum) point. Let us perturb the potential
Ṽ (u) near its extremum, in Taylor expansion:
FIG. 3. The orbit is r = eϕ/10 .
dṼ (u)
An example of orbit is a spiral, given by r = r0 eaϕ . Ṽ (u) = Ṽ (u0 ) + (u − u0 )
du
What is the form of the potential? u0
2
1 d Ṽ (u)
We have + (u − u0 )2 + ··· . (22)
2 du2
u0
L aL
ṙ = a(r0 eaϕ )ϕ̇ = ar = .
mr 2 mr Now, Ṽ (u) has a minimum at u = u0 . Let us write
d2 Ṽ (u)
From Eq. (14), we have then Ṽ (u0 ) = E0 , du2 = α and u − u0 = δ. Then,
u0
2
L2 1

m aL
+ + V (r) = E = cont. Ṽ (u) = E0 + αδ 2 + · · · . (23)
2 mr 2mr2 2
4

Then the orbit equation is


 2
1 ∗ dδ 1
m + αδ 2 = E − E0 . (24)
2 dϕ 2

Now, we can do the derivatives in r by writing d/du =


(dr/du)d/dr. Then a little exercise gives,

3V ′ (r0 ) + r0 V ′′ (r0 )
α = m∗ × (25)
V ′ (r0 )

Then, the solution of the orbit equation (which is again


a Harmonic oscillator problem), is u = u0 + A cos(Ωϕ),
with
s
3V ′ (r0 ) + r0 V ′′ (r0 )
Ω= , (26)
V ′ (r0 ) FIG. 4. The effective potential for an attractive inverse-
square-law force.
with minimum and maximum of u are u ± A. If umax
reaches at ϕ = 0, then the umin reaches at the apsidal
angle ϕA = π/Ω. But, to have a stable orbit, this must From the analysis of the effective potential, you should be
be a positive, real number, independent of E. For any able to show that, only attractive, inverse law potential
potential V (r), let us write, can have bounded orbit. For example, in case of circular
orbit, dVeff /dr = 0 gives,
3V ′ (r) + rV ′′ (r)
f (r) = . (27)
V ′ (r) dV l2 L2
− 3
= 0 ⇒ f (r) = − 3 . (30)
dr mr mr
Near r = r0 , f (r) = C, a real, positive number. This
gives, So, the force must be attractive (essentially to cancel the
centrifugal force, which is fictitious).
k n Also, we notice,
3V ′ + rV ′′ = CV ′ ⇒ V (r) = r , (28)
n
dV l2 α L2 L2
− = 0 ⇒ = ⇒ r0 = . (31)
where n = C − 2. So, only for such potentials, the f (r) dr mr3 r2 mr3 mα
is a constant! Further,
Then, Veff (r0 ) = −mα2 /2L2 .
π π π For such a potential, we need to solve
ϕA = =√ =√ . (29)
Ω C n+2  2   
du 2m 1
We immediately see that for n = −1 and 2, ϕ is a rational = 2 E − Veff , (32)
dϕ L u
multiple of π. But what about all other values of n, for
which this is also possible? We’ll discuss that no other with Veff ( u1 ) = L2 u2
+ V ( u1 ) = L2 u2
− αu, giving
2m 2m
value of n is possible (using again Newtonian dynamics),
in the next assignment. 
du
2
2mE 2mα
= 2
− u2 + 2 u
dϕ L L
B. Orbits for inverse-square-law force
 mα 2 2mE  mα 2
=− u− 2 + +
L L2 L2
 2
In astronomical problems, the potential V (r) ∝ r2 is dz
⇒ = −z 2 + B 2 , (33)
unphysical and we are left with only V (r) ∝ −1/r as dϕ
the possible potential for closed orbits. Thus, if we see
closed orbits, the gravitational force must follow an in- where
verse square-law! This neat agreement is what led physi- r
cists to astonish even today about the powerful theorem mα  mα  2EL2
z =u− 2 ; B = 1+ . (34)
we just described. L L2 mα2
Now the question is, what kind of orbits are there for Then we write,
inverse square-law potential? We’ll take Z Z
dz
α √ = dϕ (35)
V (r) = − . −z 2 + B 2
r
5

This is a small exercise to solve the equation in obtaining,


1 mα
= 2 (1 + ϵ cos(ϕ − ϕ0 )). (36)
r L
In this we can also drop integration constant ϕ0 by setting
the motion at ϕ = 0 accordingly. The above equation is
very important one.
r
2EL2
ϵ= 1+ (37)
mα2
is called the eccentricity of the particle’s motion. ϵ is
always real (that is E > −mα2 /2L2 , why?). Defining

L2
k= ,

the equation can also be written in Cartesian coordinates FIG. 5. The hyperbola solution when ϵ > 1. The two defini-
as (with ϕ0 = 0 for simplicity) tions of b (red arrows) are equivalent.
k = r + ϵx. (38)

Solving for r and squaring, we get to write the orbit equation (39) as (exercise)
2
x2 + y 2 = k 2 − 2kϵx + ϵ2 x2 . (39) (x − aϵ) y2
− = 1, (42)
a2 b2
Its another small exercise to conclude that the trajectory
which, of course, is a hyperbola with center at aϵ,
is a
in between the two straight lines:
• Circle, if ϵ = 0. x − aϵ y
± = 0. (43)
• Ellipse, if 1 < ϵ < 0. a b

• Parabola, if ϵ = 1, and, This hyperbola can have two branches. But, we


need to keep satisfying Eq. (38). For a positive
• Hyperbola, if ϵ > 1. value of k, as r increases, x needs to decrease such
that the sum of them remains constant. This allows
Other comments are following: only one solution.
• From Eq. (36), the minimum value of r can be • The impact parameter is defined as the perpendic-
found when ϕ + ϕ0 = 0, giving us ular distance of the straight lines, Eq. 43, from the
origin.
L2
rmin = . (40) Lets call the distance
mα(1 + ϵ)
p p
rmax is slightly tricky. When ϵ < 1, then the RHS d0 = x2 + y 2 = x2 + (x − aϵ)2 (b/a)2 .
of the equation is never 0 and rmax is
Then
2
L dd0
rmax = (if ϵ < 1). = 0 ⇒ x + (b/a)2 (x − aϵ) = 0, (44)
mα(1 − ϵ) dx
If ϵ > 1, then the RHS can be zero for some value with (b/a)2 = ϵ2 − 1. So, the minimum of d0 occurs
of ϕ, resulting in rmax = ∞. If it is a closed orbit, when (from the above equation),
that is, if ϵ < 1, then the apsidal angle is π.
x + (ϵ2 − 1)(x − aϵ) = 0,
• ϵ < 1 for E < 0 and ϵ ≥ 1 for E > 0. So, basically,
⇒ϵ2 x = aϵ(ϵ2 − 1) = kϵ,
for E > V (∞) = 0, the orbits are not bounded
(parabola or hyperbola). ⇒x ≡ x0 = k/ϵ.

• For ϵ > 1, let us define these positive numbers We also note that at the minimum of d0 , Eq. (44)
is also satisfied. Thus,
k k
a= , b= √ , (41) q

ϵ2 − 1 2
ϵ −1 d0min = x20 − x0 (x0 − aϵ) = x0 aϵ = b.
6

So, this small exercise shows that this distance is


also nothing but b.

• What is the minimum distance of the incom-


ing particle to the origin? For y = 0, we get
x = rmin = aϵ − a. Check that this is same as
Eq. (40).

Also, check that, at this position, the y coordinate FIG. 6. The elliptical solution when ϵ < 1.
of the asymptotic lines is also nothing but b (i.e,
in Eq. (42), use x = aϵ − a, show y = b). This is 1. Elliptical orbit
another definition of impact parameter, also shown
in Fig. 5. Also see Problem 7.14 of Morin.
For 0 < ϵ < 1, we write the orbit equation, Eq. (39),
as
2
(x + aϵ) y2 k k
• Lets have a close look at Fig. 5. What is the angle + = 1, a = , b= √ . (49)
of deflection ϕd ? From the geometry: a2 b2 1 − ϵ2 1 − ϵ2
are the semi-major and the semi-minor axes. The center
  √ the ellipse is at x2 = −aϵ. The focal length is c =
of
b a2 − b2 = kϵ/(1 − ϵ ) = aϵ, which is at the origin.
ϕd = π − 2tan−1 . (45)
a Three laws of Kepler are the following:

1. The planets move in elliptical orbits with sun


But, at the focus.

2. The radius vector to a planet sweeps out an


r
b p 2EL2
= ϵ2 − 1 = . (46) area at a rate that is independent of the position
a mα2
of the planet.

If a particle is coming from infinity with the impact This is essentially stating that the angular momentum
parameter b with initial velocity v0 , then the angu- is conserved. In a small time dt, if an area dA is swept
lar momentum is L = mv0 b, kinetic energy E = (see above figure), then, dA = r(rdϕ)/2. So,
mv02 /2. For gravitational force, α = GmM , where
dA r2 dϕ L
M is the mass at the center, with M ≫ m. Then, = = . (50)
we get b/a = v02 b/GM . If we define, γ = v02 /GM , dt 2dt 2m
then,
3. The square of the period T of an orbit is propor-
tional to the cube of the semi-major-axis length.
ϕd = π − 2tan−1 (γb). (47)
From the second-law, the area of the ellipse:
Z T Z T
dA L LT
This allows us to determine the b as A = πab = dt = = .
0 dt 0 2m 2m
  Squaring this,
1 ϕd
b= cot . (48) 4m2 π 2 a2 b2
γ 2 T2 = .
L2
Now, L2 = kmα = mα(1 − ϵ2 )a. Also, b2 = a2 (1 − ϵ2 ).
So, from the angle of deflection, one can compute Putting these, we get
the impact parameter.
4mπ 2 a3
T2 = .
α
Again, for gravitational force on a planet, α = GmM,
• For a repulsive force, where α is now negative, the where M ≫ m is the mass of the star. Thus,
orbit equation becomes always a hyperbola! This
is part of your assignment! 4π 2 a3
T2 = .
GM
7

[1] Jared Galbraith, and Jacob Williams, Journal of Under-


graduate Reports in Physics 29, 100005 (2019).
[2] S.A. Chin, Am. J. Phys. 83, 320-323 (2015).

You might also like