Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views21 pages

Chap 5 (Perception) Modify

Uploaded by

shaiful.opi1100
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views21 pages

Chap 5 (Perception) Modify

Uploaded by

shaiful.opi1100
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Chapter 5

Perception and
Individual Decision
Making

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. WWW.PRENHALL.COM/ROBBINS PowerPoint
All rights reserved. Presentation
by Charlie Cook
What Is Perception, and Why Is It Important?

Perception
A process by which •People’s behavior is
individuals organize and based on their
interpret their sensory perception of what
impressions in order to reality is, not on
give meaning to their
reality itself.
environment.
•The world as it is
perceived is the world
that is behaviorally
important.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–1


Factors That
Influence
Perception

E X H I B I T 5–1

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–2


Person Perception: Making Judgments About
Others

Attribution Theory
When individuals observe
behavior, they attempt to
determine whether it is
internally or externally
caused.

Distinctiveness: shows different behaviors in different situations.


Consensus: response is the same as others to same situation.
Consistency: responds in the same way over time.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–3


Attribution Theory
E X H I B I T 5–2

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–4


Errors and Biases in Attributions

Fundamental Attribution Error


The tendency to underestimate
the influence of external factors
and overestimate the influence
of internal factors when making
judgments about the behavior
of others.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–5


Errors and Biases in Attributions (cont’d)

Self-Serving Bias
The tendency for individuals to
attribute their own successes
to internal factors while
putting the blame for failures
on external factors.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–6


Frequently Used Shortcuts in Judging Others

Selective Perception
People selectively interpret what they see on the
basis of their interests, background, experience,
and attitudes.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–7


Frequently Used Shortcuts in Judging Others

Halo Effect
Drawing a general impression
about an individual on the
basis of a single characteristic

Contrast Effects
Evaluation of a person’s characteristics that
are affected by comparisons with other
people recently encountered who rank higher
or lower on the same characteristics.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–8


Frequently Used Shortcuts in Judging Others

Projection Stereotyping
Attributing one’s own Judging someone on the
characteristics to other basis of one’s perception of
people. the group to which that
person belongs.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–9


Specific Applications in Organizations
Employment Interview
– Perceptual biases of raters affect the accuracy of
interviewers’ judgments of applicants.
Performance Expectations
– Self-fulfilling prophecy (pygmalion effect): The lower or
higher performance of employees reflects preconceived
leader expectations about employee capabilities.
Ethnic Profiling
– A form of stereotyping in which a group of individuals
is singled out—typically on the basis of race or
ethnicity—for intensive inquiry, scrutinizing, or
investigation.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–10


Specific Applications in Organizations (cont’d)
Performance Evaluations
– Appraisals are often the subjective (judgmental)
perceptions of appraisers of another employee’s job
performance.
Employee Effort
– Assessment of individual effort is a subjective
judgment subject to perceptual distortion and bias.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–11


The Link Between Perceptions and Individual
Decision Making

Problem
A perceived discrepancy
between the current state of
affairs and a desired state. Perception
of the
decision
Decisions maker
Choices made from among
alternatives developed from
data perceived as relevant.

Outcomes

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–12


Assumptions of the Rational Decision-Making
Model

Rational Decision-
Model Assumptions
Making Model
• Problem clarity
Describes how
individuals should • Known options
behave in order to • Clear preferences
maximize some • Constant
outcome. preferences
• No time or cost
constraints
• Maximum payoff

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–13


Steps in the Rational Decision-Making Model

1. Define the problem.


2. Identify the decision criteria.
3. Allocate weights to the criteria.
4. Develop the alternatives.
5. Evaluate the alternatives.
6. Select the best alternative.

E X H I B I T 5–3

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–14


The Three Components of Creativity

Creativity
The ability to produce
novel and useful ideas.

Three-Component
Model of Creativity
Proposition that individual
creativity requires expertise,
creative-thinking skills, and
intrinsic task motivation.

E X H I B I T 5–4
Source: T.M. Amabile, “Motivating Creativity in Organizations,” California Management Review, Fall 1997, p. 43.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–15


How Are Decisions Actually Made in
Organizations

Bounded Rationality
Individuals make decisions by constructing
simplified models that extract the essential
features from problems without capturing
all their complexity.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–16


Intuition
Intuitive Decision Making
– An unconscious process created out of distilled
experience.
Conditions Favoring Intuitive Decision Making
– A high level of uncertainty exists
– There is little precedent to draw on
– Variables are less scientifically predictable
– “Facts” are limited
– Facts don’t clearly point the way
– Analytical data are of little use
– Several plausible alternative solutions exist
– Time is limited and pressing for the right decision

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–17


Decision-Style Model

Source: A.J. Rowe and J.D. Boulgarides, Managerial Decision E X H I B I T 5–5


Making, (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992), p. 29.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–18


Ethics in Decision Making
Ethical Decision Criteria
– Utilitarianism
• Seeking the greatest good for the greatest number.
– Rights
• Respecting and protecting basic rights of individuals such
as whistleblowers.
– Justice
• Imposing and enforcing rules fairly and impartially.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–19


Ethics in Decision Making
Ethics and National Culture
– There are no global ethical standards.
– The ethical principles of global organizations that
reflect and respect local cultural norms are necessary
for high standards and consistent practices.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5–20

You might also like