Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views2 pages

Rubrics

The document outlines the structure and criteria for a research defense presentation for students at the College of Arts and Science of Asia and the Pacific. It includes sections for researcher details, proposed research title, and a scoring rubric divided into content, organization, presentation, and fielding questions. The overall scoring is out of 100 points, determining a pass or fail decision on the research problem or title.

Uploaded by

mainedel002
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views2 pages

Rubrics

The document outlines the structure and criteria for a research defense presentation for students at the College of Arts and Science of Asia and the Pacific. It includes sections for researcher details, proposed research title, and a scoring rubric divided into content, organization, presentation, and fielding questions. The overall scoring is out of 100 points, determining a pass or fail decision on the research problem or title.

Uploaded by

mainedel002
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1 College of Arts and Science of Asia and the Pacific

2 Rodriguez, Campus
3 85 D Payatas Road, Brgy. San Jose,
4 Rodriguez, Rizal, Rodriguez, Philippines
5
6 ____________________________________________________________________

1 INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION AND IMMERSION


2 RESEARCH DEFENSE
3 Group Number: _________________________ Grade/ Section :________________________
4 Researcher(s):
5 1._____________________________ 9 5. ____________________________ 13 9. ____________________________
6 2._____________________________ 10 6. ____________________________ 14 10. ___________________________
7 3._____________________________ 11 7. ____________________________ 15 11. ___________________________
8 4. ____________________________ 12 8. ____________________________ 16 12. ___________________________
17
18 PROPOSED TITLE OF RESEARCH:
19 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
20 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
21 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
22 Title / Research Question Defense Scoring Rubric
Criteria Total Score
Points
Content ( 45%)
1. Introduction contains complete and well-organized overview statement. 5
2. Research Problem is feasible and manageable 5
3. Research questions are clear, specific, and provides overall direction and frame for the proposed 5
study.
4. Proposed title identifies all elements (research variables, locus, argument, and design). 5

5. Soundness of methodology (research design, data collection method, sampling technique) 5

6. Presentation contains accurate information. 5


7. Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made reflect well their relative 5
importance.
8. Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the 2
target audience.
9. Content of paper is thoroughly addressed and main issues are well covered. 5
10. Research topic is relevant to the strand 3
Total 45
Organization ( 15%)
1. The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience. 5

2. Information material and visuals used in presentation are arranged and presented logically with 5
the main points.
3. All resources are correctly cited. 5
Total 20
Presentation and Delivery ( 25%)
1. Speakers uses a clear, audible voice. 3
2. Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. 3
3. Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately 3
animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).
1

4. Good language skills and pronunciation are used. 3


5. Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not distracting. 3

6. Students are dressed appropriately. 2


7. Information was well communicated. 3
8. Speaking duties are equally shared by all members. 3
9. Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 2
Total 25
Fielding Questions (15%)
1. All team members are willing to address the topic of the questions and show knowledge in areas 5
related to their chosen topic.
2. Researchers are eager to answer questions. 5
3. Questions are answered correctly. 5
Total 15
Over All Points 100 %

Decision on Research Problem/Title (Pass or Fail)


_______________________________________
3 Signature over Printed Name of Panel Member
4

You might also like