ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.
5 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.9859/2023
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-05-2023
in CRMP No. 325/2017 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at
Ranchi]
SATISH KUMAR RAVI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondent(s)
(IA No. 158964/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 236772/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No.
158963/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 252467/2024 -
PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 29-11-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ujjwal Singh, AOR
Mr. Mojahid Karim Khan, Adv.
Mr. Shadab Eqbal, Adv.
Mrs. Atefa Perwez, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Naik, Adv.
Mrs. Gulafsha Qureshi, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR
Mr. Pawan Kishore Singh, Adv.
Mr. Dipankar Singh, Adv.
Mrs. Anupama Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Pavithra V., Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Perused the affidavit of Shri Deepak Kumar, Deputy
Signature Not Verified
Superintendent
Digitally signed by
KAVITA PAHUJA
Date: 2024.12.03
of Police, Shri Tarkeshwar Prasad Kesari,
10:01:06 IST
Reason:
Investigating Officer and Shri Dayanand Kumar, Station House
1
Officer. They have stated that they read the order of this Court
which directed them not to take any further action against the
petitioner as an order directing that no coercive action shall be
taken against the petitioner.
They have relied upon a letter dated 15th April, 2011 addressed
by the Additional Director General of Police, Jharkhand to all
Police Officers in the State. It is stated in the letter that even
if court passes an order that no coercive action shall be taken as
against the particular accused, there is no prohibition on filing
charge-sheet against the accused. If a charge sheet is filed by
relying upon clause 3 of letter dated 15th April, 2011 against an
accused in whose favour there is an order directing not to take
coercive action, the concerned officer will expose himself to
contempt jurisdiction.
Therefore, what is stated in paragraph 3 of letter dated 15th
April, 2011 is completely illegal. We direct the learned counsel
appearing for the State to invite attention of the Additional
Director General of Police to observations of this court. We
expect him to immediately modify the letter dated 15th April, 2011.
The apology tendered by three officers is accepted and no
further action is called for against them. Hence, notice of
contempt is discharged.
List the petition for hearing on 17th January, 2025.
Interim relief granted by this Court shall continue to
operate.
(KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU)
AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)