Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
27 views1 page

Judgement

The Supreme Court of India is hearing a petition for special leave to appeal regarding a case involving Just Rights for Children Alliance against Sahjan Ali and another. The court noted that service on the first respondent is incomplete and ordered fresh notice to be issued, returnable in four weeks. The second respondent is also tasked with notifying the first respondent about the pending petition.

Uploaded by

khandkakhushii
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views1 page

Judgement

The Supreme Court of India is hearing a petition for special leave to appeal regarding a case involving Just Rights for Children Alliance against Sahjan Ali and another. The court noted that service on the first respondent is incomplete and ordered fresh notice to be issued, returnable in four weeks. The second respondent is also tasked with notifying the first respondent about the pending petition.

Uploaded by

khandkakhushii
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.

11 SECTION II-D

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4286/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-12-2024


in CRLA No. 397/2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
Delhi]

JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SAHJAN ALI & ANR. Respondent(s)


IA No. 56356/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
IA No. 56357/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 28-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Bhuwan Ribhu, Adv.
Ms. Rachna Tyagi, Adv.
Ms. Shashi, Adv.
Ms. Surabhi Katyal, Adv.
Ms. Surpreet Kaur, Adv.
Ms. Sonali Jain, AOR

For Respondent(s) :Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G.


Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Adv.
Mr. Sudhakar Kulwant, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R

1. Read the office report dated 25.07.2025. Service on respondent no.1 is

not complete.

2. Let fresh notice be issued to respondent no.1, returnable in four weeks.


Signature Not Verified

3.
Digitally signed by
JATINDER KAUR Respondent no.2 shall also make endeavors to bring to the notice of
Date: 2025.07.28
17:58:07 IST
Reason:

respondent no.1 the pendency of the special leave petition.

(JATINDER KAUR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)


P.S. to REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

You might also like