Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views11 pages

Compre - Research

The document outlines the major steps of the research process, including the conceptual, defining and planning, empirical, analytic, and disseminating phases. It emphasizes the importance of research in nursing, detailing methodologies, frameworks, and the significance of hypothesis formulation. Additionally, it discusses various sampling techniques and criteria for effective research design and execution.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views11 pages

Compre - Research

The document outlines the major steps of the research process, including the conceptual, defining and planning, empirical, analytic, and disseminating phases. It emphasizes the importance of research in nursing, detailing methodologies, frameworks, and the significance of hypothesis formulation. Additionally, it discusses various sampling techniques and criteria for effective research design and execution.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

5 MAJOR STEPS OF RESEARCH PROCESS

RESEARCH
PHASE 1: CONCEPTUAL PHASE
 Scientific method (Experiment) - formal way to discover
new things  Formulating & developing research problem

 Research - more formal, intensive, and comprehensive  Reviewing related literature

method to discover new things  synthesis of reviews studies - related to the problem

 months to years of interest

 5 steps  PURPOSE

 Problem identification  Get an idea or background about the study

 Formulation of hypothesis (nagawa/ hindi pa nagagawa)

 Experiment  Undertaking a clinical fieldwork

 Observation & analysis  same with RRL - because they compliment each

 Conclusion other

 Nursing research  Defining framework & conceptual definitions

 Deals with clinical problems - encountered during  Graphical presentation of concepts and

clinical area relationships between concepts (flow chart) - from

 Most common RRL

 Research in nursing  Not include the findings

 More broader study of nursing in the profession  2 TYPES OF FRAMEWORK

 RRL + clinical field works  CONCEPTUAL

 Focuses more in issues  Relate the concept from the topic

 Educational issues  THEORETICAL

 Professional issues  Relate the concept from the existing

 Social issues theory (environmental theory/ or own

= which affect nursing profession theory (what ifs))


 Definition of terms
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE  Define the variables
 Operational definitions - on how they
 Use of current best evidence in practice were use in the study
 Latest findings  Highly technical terms - definitions
 Example: Experimental drug covid-19 found in the reference
 *if talks about finding = wrong/false
 Formulating the hypothesis
IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH PHASE 2: DEFINING & PLANNING PHASE

- most rigorous/ spend more of time (mas pinag-iisipan)


 Professionalism - to enhance
 Selecting the research design
 Increase accountability - to see how far can nurisng go
 Developing the protocols for the interventions
 Social relevance
 optional
 Research & Decision making - mainly for
 For experimental research - consists intervention
& manipulations
 For accurate results = uniform process during
ULTIMATE GOAL IN RESEARCH
before, during, & after the intervention
 Identifying the population to be studied
 Highest goal of research - to improve the practice of the
 Designing the sampling plan
profession (across all discipline)
 Probability
 To improve client care/ patient care/ health care/ nursing
 Non-probability
care
 Specifying the methods on how to measure research
 Covers all the importance of research
variables
 Tools or Instrument for the data collection/
gathering = to know the limitations  Use of existing data - already available
 Developing a method on how to safeguard human/animal  case presentation - by using pt chart
rights  Any forms of documentation/ reports -
 Reviewing & finalizing the plan graph of the doh
PHASE 3: EMPIRICAL PHASE  Self reports - can gather data by oral or

- Longest phase writing

 Collecting the data  Gathered by researchers

 Preparing the data for analyzing  Interviews & Questionnaire - most widely

 levels of measurement used forms of data collection


 It can gather data that cannot gather by
PHASE 4: ANALYTIC PHASE
other methods
 Analyzing the data
 Gather opinions
 Interpreting the results
 Cannot gather through equipment
 differential
and gadgets
 Inferential statistics
 Data - can be gathered through
PHASE 5: DISSEMINATING PHASE
equipment and gadgets
 Communicating the findings  Most common used
 Utilizing the findings into practice  Flexible - can jump from 1 question to
 Evidence based practice another
 Versatile
PROBLEM  Disadvantages:
 Sources of research problem  Validity & accuracy (most crucial)
 Nursing literatures  Observation
 Ideas from external sources  Participant observer
 Theory - existing/ own theory  You give an intervention then
 Experience & clinical fieldwork* - rich from observe
information  Disguised yourself as subjects
 Social issues - from the society (autism, drug  Non-participant
addiction)  Not to give intervention
 Scientific research - previous research; done again  Only observe

since there could be modifications & innovations -  Phenomena observer (amenable to


LEAST BEING USED observe)
 Characteristics & Condition of the

CRITERIA OF GOOD RESEARCH PROBLEM subjects


 Example: newborns with rh
 Significance of the study
incompatibility- jaundice
 address to the people - target of the research
 Activities and Behavior of the
 address to the society at large - not the target of
subjects
the research
 example: autism - ignore
 address to the profession - to improve the practice
tantrums
 easy to make
 Skill attainment & performance
 Availability of subjects
 example: return demonstration
 To get the information (Research about GBS - 1/
 Environmental characteristics
100 000 people)
 example: surroundings
 Limitation of the subjects (cannot read/ write)
 Verbal communication
 Time allotment + researchers ability
 example: manner how to
 Pre-research - do feasibility study (to determine the
answer the questions
ability)
 Assess the true emotions &
 Limitation of tools
feelings
 Major forms of data gathering
 Speech, tone, intonation  what vary in the population
 Non-verbal communication  Paiba iba = nagbabago
 example:  Relationship
 Gesture  Population to which it applies - most neglect but
 Facial expression MOST IMPORTANT
 Posture  1st to identify
 Body language  Include all the characteristics + sets ( if 2 or
 To assess true emotion & more then concentrate to characteristics which
feelings is different ) (researcher who sets)
 Biophysical measurements
 Use of equipment & gadgets
 In-vivo
 the measurement perform
directly to the subjects
 Cbg analysis, oxygen
saturation
 In-vitro
 the measurement is perform
outside
 Gather the specimen to the
laboratory
 Fecalysis, urinalysis
 1 set
 tip: characteristics have no significance = eliminate
CRITERIA TO KNOW THE EFFECTIVITY OF THE TOOL  Go back to the hypothesis and ask “what is being
studied?”
 VALIDITY - measure what is supposed to be
measure MANIPULATION (experimental)
 same tools = same results  Anything that is given to the subjects
 RELIABILITY - consistency or repeatability of the  All manipulation is considered INDEPENDENT
tool VARIABLE
 SENSITIVITY - detect small variations of the
differences
RESEARCH DESIGNS
- if the does not meet the criteria! They used different tools
 According to motive (purpose)
 Interest of the researchers  Pure/ basic research
 Novelty  Increase knowledge
 Newest and freshness of research  Applied
 This is why scientific research is LEAST USED!  Use knowledge into practice
 According to the levels of investigation
 level 1 - Exploratory = pure/ basic
HYPOTHESIS
 You wanted to identify the variables
 Educated guess, wild guess - tentative prediction of the  Walang alam, pero may gusto kang malaman
relationship between variables  Researchers looking for OPINION
 4 parts  QUALITY (quality of life of brgy masigla)
 Independent variable - Cause  If the researcher trying to get CENSUS/
 characteristic na magkaiba FREQUENCY (favorite color of brgy makulay)
 Fixed = set  Level 2 - Descriptive = pure/basic
 Dependent variable - Effect  Wanted to know whether the variables are
accumulated or related 3. Case study - DESCRIPTIVE
 May alam pero gustong madagdagan  in-dept/in-detail study of person or entities
 “FACTS & ISSUES” “STUDY” “ANALYSIS” 4. Methodological - DESCRIPTIVE
1. Descriptive - you wanted to describe the  study of methods/ results/ procedures
variables as it is 5. Analytical - DESCRIPTIVE
 “DESCRIBE”  further her analysis of issues or events -
 Example: the new bsn curriculum PRESENT
2. Descriptive correlation - wanted to describe  Experimental
the relationship of the variables to each other  With manipulation
 “RELATIONSHIP”  2 sets of group (always present)
 Example: new bsn curriculum and the  experimental group - where we give
readiness of the students manipulation
3. Descriptive comparative- compare the  control group - where we compare the
variables to each other results of the experimental group
 “SIMILARITIES” 1. True experiment
 Example: the old and new bsn curriculum  STRICT CONTROL over the variables
 Elements of an experimental research should be
 level 3 - Experiment = applied present
 wanted to find out the cause and effect of the  Randomization
variables to each other  Have no idea about the samples = equal
 music therapy can increase/decrease chance
anxiety levels  Manipulation
 “EFFECT”  Anything that is given
 If there’s manipulation  At least 3 trials
 medication  Experimental group - give experimental
 Treatment manipulation
 Education  Blind experiment - subjects do not know
 Massage which group they belong
 both experimental & control group
PROCESS OF ELIMINATION  Double blind - researcher and groups do
 read the choices not know which group they belong =
 Opinion/ Census = exploratory prevent bias
 survey  Control group
 Manipulation = experimental  who received placebo effect -
 quasi without therapeutic effect
 Descriptive  Sugar, Sterile water, Nss
 Historical  we can give others
 Case Study  music therapy, vitamins
 Methodological  WHERE TO GIVE??
 Analyticl  Without comparison = PLACEBO
 With comparison = OTHERS
 According to the approach or design  Control
 Non-experimental  where to compare the results
 without manipulation 2. Quasi experiment
1. Historical - DESCRIPTIVE  “quasi” - just like a true experiment
 Study of the past - about issues  lacks randomization = non-random
2. Survey - EXPLORATORY  Overcome the manipulation = ineffective
 Use of survey & questionnaires to gather  The control overcomes the variables = high
PUBLIC OPINION chance of bias
 presence of manipulation & control  Samples readily available
2. Quota sampling
 According to time frame  Get the portion of the population
1. Cross sectional  There’s a limit
 One time study 3. Purposive/ Judgmental
2. Longitudinal  Hand pick of the researchers
 Repetitive study  Based on the knowledge of the sample
3. Retrospective 4. Snowball
 Study of the past to explain the present  Networking or Referral system
4. Prospective  Probability Sampling
 Study of the present to predict the future  Random
 Example: global warming  No idea = every sample has a chance to be pick
1. Simple Random sampling
 Everybody has a chance to become a
POPULATION
sampling
 Entire aggregate of cases that the researcher would like  Bingo, drawlots, mini manimo
to study  No groupings = all are present
2. Stratified Sampling
Eligibility criteria  you create a strata of population, then divide
 exact criteria to narrowed down the population the population into homogenous group
 All 1st takers  Basis - is the strata/ or characteristics
 Homogenous group - group them based on
Accessible population the same characteristics
 Entire aggregate cases that is redeem within reach  W grouping & basis = strata
of the researchers 3. Cluster Sampling
 All first taker in metro manila  Cluster mean big group
 Successive random sampling of units
Target population  No distinct characteristics
 Entire aggregate cases what researches would like 4. Systematic Sampling
to make generalization  Get the Kth of the list
 This is where to FOCUS
 “universe”
 All 1sy takers from 3 school in metro manila

SAMPLING TECHNIQUE

SAMPLING
 Process used to get the representative f the population

1. Simplify first the denominator


SAMPLE
2. Marginal error is always given
 The representative
3. EXe
 1 characteristics = representativeness, presentation
4. X pop
5. +1
SAMPLING PLAN
6. / by pop
2 types
 Non-probability sampling
 Have an idea who is the sample = everyone has no
chance to be a sample
 Non-random = not equal chance
1. Convenience/ Accidental sampling
4 BASIC RIGHTS OF RESEARCH SUBJECTS  Mean - average (+ all the values then ? By all
the values)
1. Right not to be harm
 Median - middle value
a) Beneficence
 Mode - one that frequently appears
b) Non-beneficence
 Measure of Variability
2. Right to full disclosure
 Simple rank, Range, Variance & Standard
a) Veracity
Deviation
3. Right to self-determination
2. Inferential Analysis
a) Autonomy
 Is to prove the hypothesis
4. Right to anonymity, confidentiality & privacy
 Population = count the number of set
 ANOVA
 If 3 or more sets —> with 1 comparable
PLANNING & FINALIZATION
variable
 Chi-square
LEVEL OF MEASUREMENT
 If 1 set —> with 2 comparable variable and
focus on the frequency
 Assignment of numbers according to rules
 T-tests
1. Nominal
 Student t-test or independent
 Categorical
 If have 2 set of population, compared to 1
 Just name the category
variable
 Name , Gender
 Paired t-test
 It only represent to the category
 If only have 1 set with dependent groups/
2. Ordinal
results
 Categorical
 Dependent group results =
 Shows ranking of events
dependent to one another
 It only shows orders
 Before & after
 ranking of board examiners , best-good-not
Pearson R
good
 1 set —> 2 or more comparable variable but focus
3. Interval
on interval/ ratio data
 Numerical
 Shows ranking of events with equal of
intervals
TIP:
 0 is not absolute = 0 has a value
3 or more = anova
 Temperature, IQ
2 = student
4. Ratio
1 = look forr ( before & after) = paired
 Numerical
= number = pearson
 Show ranking bot 0 is absolute
= if both are not = chi-square
 If 0 is the always last number
 weight

ANALYSIS

1. Descriptive analysis
 This does not to prove the hypothesis
 It only summarize the data
 Frequency of Distribution
 Use of tables and graphs
 are the one’s communicate to the readers
 Measures of Central Tendency
 Pt should fully understand
 Pt should voluntarily consented
BIOETHICAL PRINCIPLES
 There’ s no violence, force, coercion
1. AUTONOMY  Pt should be coherent, sound, and conscious
 Auto - means self  Pt should voluntarily sign the consent
 Nomo - means governance
 Self governance REQUIREMENT
 It is the right of individual to decide for her/him  For pt to sign the consent
 Decision making = Autonomy 1. AGE
 If pt refuse - ACCEPT (article 3, section 6)  18 ↑
 After the refusal what is the priority: DOCUMENT!  Contract is already valid and legal in binding
IMMEDIATELY THE REFUSAL  Except if married
 If anything happens to the pt, chart is the  You can only be married if 18 ↑
first to check  If ↓ the marriage will be VOID
 If not written in the chart = it is your  21 ↓ = need parents consent = it is
accountability avoidable
 21 ↑ - need parents advice = but X
CODE OF ETHICS: BON RES 2205. 2004 not avoidable
 ARTICLE 1: PREAMBLE  But can delay marriage license
 ARTICLE 2-6 : RESPONSIBILITY 2. SHOULD SOUND MIND
 ARTICLE 8 : PENALTIES, REPEALING CLAUSE, &  Conscious, Coherent
EFFECTIVITY  Ability to read & write = is not requirement
 Don’t ask for waver = it is the decision of the  Thumb mark = if can’t write
MD
 Don’t explain the action of the drug = it is the  IF MINOR
role of the MD = NEVER EXPLAIN  Next of kin - follow the hierarchy
 Because before giving them the drug  Parents
during administration, you already inform  Siblings - age of the majority (18 y/old)
them about it  Grandparents
*if patient refuse to take drugs - Accept  Legal guardian
* Jehovah pt refuse for blood transfusion - Accept  LEGAL AGE
* What if medication is new and pt is refuse - Explain the  But not coherent, conscious
CONSEQUENCES of the refusal  Next of kin
 Not the action or procedure  Spouse - legal
 Children who is legal age
PATERNALISM  Parents
 Decide behalf of the patient is the MD  Grand parents
 Withhold the autonomy of the patient  Legal guardian
* Jehovah witness accident which had excessive blood loss =  IF BABY, BUT MINOR MOTHER
MD decide what is the best treatment for the pt  Next of kin
 Father - if legal
INFORMED CONCENT
 Birth certificate = it should be
acknowledge
 It is a agreement or serves as contract
 If minor = can’t give consent
Who gives the consent = PT
 Grandparents - only in the mother side
Who explains the consent, procedure & treatment = MD
 Because the baby is illegitimate
Witness = NURSING
 Legal guardian
 Actual conversation between MD & PT
 It is decided by the board
 Full or sufficient explanation coming from the MD
 if X legal guardian = government
 DSWD  Emergency room
 Last, is MD (paternalism)  Prioritize the patient have severe condition/
who needed the most attention
*IMMEDIATE FAMILY IS THE PRIORITY
6. CONFIDENTIALITY, ANONYMITY, & PRIVACY
2. VERACITY
 Truthfulness/ Honesty ANONYMITY
 Full disclosure - nature, length of study, side effects,  We don’t disclose the name of the patient = to protect
benefits, consequence contact info of researchers their identity
 Veracity in the ward is different in nursing research  Example: Case Presentation - used initial of the pt
 Ward: we only say information that MD order
 Research: research is responsible to tell CONFIDENTIALITY
everything truth to the participants  We don’t disclose any information or case of the subjects
 Especially personal info (to reach easily)  Disclose - only to professionally and directly involved
 PRINCIPLE OF BENEVOLENT DECEPTION  Unless will coordinate with other department
 Deception - deceive  Or required/ allowed by law
 Withhold truth to the patient or the benefit of  Case of malpractice
the pt due to the pt condition is unstable  Subpeona duces tecum (court orders)
 Do not lie to pt, but just hold the truth  This is a court order asking the person to
 MD - burden to tell the truth appear in court bring along with
records/ documents within his control
3. BENEFICIENCE  Within in your possession or
 To do (may ginawa lang) disposal = with authority
DOUBLE
EFFECTS Court order - process how situation take place
4. NON-MALEFICENCE  Subpeona ad testificandum (court orders)
 To prevent or to protect  Court order asking a person to appear in
court to testify
PRINCIPLES DOUBLE EFFECTS  Subpeona summon
 Good & Bad effect  Not a court order wherein a notice
 Good effects should overcomes the bad effect informing the accused that there is a case
 Even though there’s a side effects, we still give filed against him; informing him about the
it to pt nature and cause of accusation against
 Example: Chemotherapy him and asking him to appear or to
 Bad effects overthrows the Good effect = STOP! answer in a specified date and time.
 You can stop even though without MD order  Requirement of the due process
 If cover only by the Double Effects  Notice and Hiring
 But REPORT TO THE MD IMMEDIATELY  Within 15 days
 Example: Chemotherapy - ↑ wbc = infection  If don’t answer to the notice;
repercussion = you wave the right to
5. PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE defend yourself
 Equal or Fair treatment to your patient that are similarly 
situated
 If we always apply the justice = X TRIAGING *Perjury = if you lie
 TRIAGE - prioritization based on the severity of the
condition 2 TYPES OF WITNESS
 Disaster - reverse 1. ORDINARY WITNESS
 Save many pt as possible  To testify others within your personal knowledge
 The health-care personnel is the priority  Knowledge or information that you have acquired
through your senses organization (PNA) = RA 9173 (one of the
2. WITNESS grounds for revocation & suspension of license
 Knowledge comes from 3 person
rd
is violation of the code of ethics - article 16&
 Not use in court 17 = be a member)

Dying declaration 8. PRINCIPLE OF ADVOCACY


 Not oral will  Active support of an idea or cause
 The deceased will confess to other person the  To do everything to protect life
circumstances of his/her death  Shall take appropriate steps to safeguard their
 Applicable: if there’s a impending death, the rights and privileges = AS A ADOCATE OF THE
sudden death PATIENTS
 Ensure that needs are given
Notarial will
 Executed in the presence of 3 confident/ competent
NEGLIGENCE & MALPRACTICE
wittiness (witness = to witness due execution)
 due execution - not force, but coherent and * MALPRACTICE IS ALSO NEGLIGENCE = PROFESSIONAL

conscious and in sound mind NEGLIGENCE

Holographic will 1. NEGLIGENCE

 Written , Dated, and Signed by the hand of testator/  Commission or omission of an act pursuant to the duty

testator him self reasonable prudent person would or would not do


 May ginawa ka or may hindi ka ginawa

3. Expert witness  Simply means - CARELESSNESS

 Testify ion the matter in their field of specialization  You didn’t practice due diligence

Unwilling witness ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE:

 Direct contempt - direct disobedience to a court  Existence of duty

 you will be arrested  Failure to meet the standard/ breech of duty

 Required to attend  Foresee-ability of harm/ proximate causation

 Warrant of arrest - can be given to witness if there is  Injury - is a material

unwillingness of witness
 Purpose of 3 witness *Absence of INJURY = NO case of negligence

 Witness the due execution of the will


 Will appear before the notary public 2. MALPRACTICE
 Mal = WRONG

PRIVACY  Professional negligence = W/ license

 Includes private moment, parts & property  Based on DUTY

 Moments - right to have to be alone  2 GROUNDS

 Parts - cover/ drape the patient during procedure  Stepping beyond one’s authority = doing something

 Property - anything that possess of the pt outside your practice

 Pictures  With or without injury

 Videos  Improper/ unskillful care of patient


 Lack of skill - incompetence

7. PRINCIPLES OF FIDELITY
 Faithfulness/ Loyalty ELEMENTS OF MALPRACTICE:

 Commitment to continual learning and active  Existence of duty

participation in the development and growth of  Failure to meet the standard/ breech of duty

the profession  Foresee-ability of harm/ proximate causation

 To be a member of a accredited professional  Injury - is a material of evidence


 Except: if life and death situation
INCOMPETENCE
 Lack of skill  Plaintiff/ pt did not participate
 Gross incompetence - matagal ka na sa nursing  The injury is come from own doing
pero wala ka pa ring alam
 Can revoked license 3. FORCE MAJEURE
 Irresistible, inevitable, unforeseeable
 Although sometime foreseen, it cannot be prevented
DOCTRINES OF NEGLIGENCE  AOG (ACTS OF GOD)
 Volcanic eruption
1. RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR  Tsunami
 let the master answer for the acts of each subordinate  Flood
 No shifting of liability  Earthquake
 Liability - stay in stay who committed the negligence  Typhoon
 But the superior is also liable = as long as the is  Hurricane
superior-subordinate relationship *WALANG PUMIPIGIL NA MAGDEMANDA = DEFENSE -
 Superior-subordinate relationship FORCE MAJEURE
 Exercise of power over the subordinate
 Command span responsibility - may alam o wala =
TORTS
liable pa rin
 The higher the position = the higher the TORTS
responsibilities  Civil wrong or wrongful act committed by a person
 Employer- employee relationship against another wherein the person is liable for damages
 Vicarious viability - it is delicated responsibility *Damages = danyos
 RA 2180
1. ASSAULT & BATTERY
2. RES IPSA LOQUITOR
 The thing speaks for itself = evidence (INJURY) ASSAULT
 Thing = evidence  Imminent threat of body harm or contact
 Evidence of negligence = INJURY  The threat is immediate
 ELEMENTS  Can happen anytime/ its bound to happen
 Injury will normally occur unless there’s BATTERY
negligence  Unconsented touch or cause bodily harm
CAPTAIN OF THE SHIP  Physical harm
 The surgeon is the responsible to anything that will  Already cause harm
happen inside the operation room
GRAVE THREAT
 Agency/ Instrumentality within control of the  Threats on the lives
defendant  Considered as criminal case
ASSUMPTION OF RISK
 Pt already inform about the risk yet still pushed 2. BREACH OF CONDIDENTIALITY AND INVASION OF
through the procedure, equipment, treatment RIVACY
 Not liable anymore because you already inform the
pt about the risk BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY
 Committed through publication of any picture of a pt
*INFORM CONSENT SHOOULD NOT BE WAVE = without the consent
general rule
 Even its emergency
 Consent serves as protection
3. FALSE IMPRISONMENT & ILLEGAL DETENTION

FALSE IMPRISONMENT
 Without violation of the law.
 Limitation of movement only or there is an installment of
an idea that he or she cannot go out
 Restraints - provided by MD order

ILLEGAL DETENTION
 in violation of a law
 Detaining the person against their will while violation of
the law
 Criminal case in nature

4. DEFAMATION
 Destroying reputation of the another person whether true
or not
 LIBEL - public
 Oral
 Written - magazine or diaryo
 SLANDER - private
 Oral - chismis between 2 private person, but
someone hear it
 There should be requirement of witness
 Slander by deed - a form of defamation
through action
 If you slap other = because face of a
person carries the reputation
 CYBER-LIBEL
 Posting someone in social media

You might also like