Rating System
Based on the role requirements we have evaluated the candidates using a 4 series
criteria, assigning scores 1 of 10 for how well they rate in each area:
1. Years of Experience in the Field (10 points)
2. Education and/or Applicable Experience (10 points)
3. Knowledge of State and Federal Regulations (10 points)
4. Overall Performance and Suitability for the Role (10 points)
Candidate Evaluation
Joseph
1. Years of Experience: 10 years (10/10)
2. Education and Experience: No degree, assistant manager experience (6/10
)
3. Knowledge of Regulations: Needs updating (5/10)
4. Overall view of candidates
Performance: : Mixed track record (7/10) Total: 28/40
Marie
1. Years of Experience: 10 years (10/10)
2. Education and Experience: Associate's degree, pursuing Bachelor's, limite
d office experience (7/10)
3. Knowledge of Regulations: Limited experience (6/10)
4. Overall view of candidates
Performance: Excellent track record as bookkeeper, good employee (8/10)
Total: 31/40
Jack
1. Years of Experience: 3.5 years (6/10)
2. Education and Experience: Associate's degree, plans to pursue Bachelor's,
previous office manager experience (8/10)
3. Knowledge of Regulations: Good knowledge (8/10)
4. Overall view of candidates
Performance: : Good recommendations but late to interview (7/10) Total: 2
9/40
Susan
1. Years of Experience: 5 years (8/10)
2. Education and Experience: Bachelor's degree, plans to pursue MBA (9/10)
3. Knowledge of Regulations: Good knowledge (8/10)
4. Overall view of candidates
Performance: : Confident, goal to become General Manager (8/10) Total: 33
/40
Thomas
1. Years of Experience: 7 years (7/10)
2. Education and Experience: Associate degree, experience as Parts Room M
anager (7/10)
3. Knowledge of Regulations: Limited to parts department (6/10)
4. Overall view of candidates Performance: : Well-liked, enthusiastic, detail-
oriented (7/10) Total: 27/40
Donna
1. Years of work experience: 25 years (10/10)
2. Education Level and
relevant experience: Bachelor's degree in Human Resources (8/10)
3. Expertise and knowledge of Regulations: Good knowledge (8/10)
4. Overall view of candidates
Performance: Professional, efficient, occasionally looks down on others (7/1
0) Total: 33/40
Candidate best suited for position
Based on the rating system, the top two candidates for the position would
be Susan and Donna, who both scored 33/40 on the rating system. However, when
we look at the the full scope of the role, leadership
potential and their backgrounds, Susan is the better choice for leadership role she is
confidence and has the desire to become a General Manager, which is what we are
looking for in the candidate for the position. With Donna’s potential to look down
on people she may not be a good fit.
