School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences Session: 2024/2025
Coursework 2
Course: COMP11082 Incident Response
Topic: Coursework 2: Incident Response Plan
Handed Out: 10th April 2025
Submission Deadline: 09th May, 2025 (23:59 PM) Aula
Assessment: 50%
Student Name:
Student ID:
Description:
1
School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences Session: 2024/2025
Suppose you are the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) of a
reputable organisation in the media industry, say “S10 Media Pvt.
Ltd.”. Your organisation deals with developing VFX graphics, video
games and movies for OTT platforms like Amazon, Netflix, YouTube
etc. S10 Media Pvt. Ltd. is a large organisation with more than 300
employees, and 4 different departments (Development, Accounts, HR
and Creative), and has offices in London (UK, Headquarter),
Mumbai (India), and San Francisco (USA).
Carry out a search on the Internet to find the incident response plans
of various organisations, and read the SANS’s 6 stages of the incident
plan, prepare the full incident response plan for S10 Media Pvt. Ltd.
You should include flowcharts and good explanations where
required.
Coursework Report Guidelines:
Don’t forget to include your name along with banner IDs.
The paragraph text should be aligned from the right to left both
sides justify.
Please use proper headings and subheadings.
You are strongly advised to stay away from plagiarism, as it is a
serious matter.
The report must be submitted on or before the deadline.
Late submission will result in mark deductions.
The report should not be more than 10 pages including references
and a title/cover page.
Marking Scheme:
The table below outlines how marks will be allocated concerning the
module marks and the university’s grading scheme.
2
School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences Session: 2024/2025
The report will be graded based on the following: For 100%
1. Contents of the Report (65%)
2. Structure and Style (15%)
3. Originality and Plagiarism (10%)
4. Referencing (10%)
Grading rubric as per given below:
Marks (%) Contents Structure Originality Referencing
(65%) (15%) & (10%)
Plagiarism
(10%)
(90-100) Excellent Excellent 0% Harvard style
background academic style plagiarized. of referencing.
of writing, All text is
discussion, well-
with no adequately
constructed grammatical referenced
discussion of errors, formal with proper
existing issues, a citation.
and excellent
detailed report
comparison with structure with
existing and a formal title,
previous studies, contents,
graphical listings, proper
representation of sections, page
analysis, excellent numbers, and
summarization, appendices.
excellent
presentation of
highlighted issues
and clear future
recommendations.
(80-89) Very good Very good 05% Harvard style
background academic style plagiarized. of referencing.
Almost all text
discussion, a well- of writing,
is cited
refined discussion with no properly.
of existing issues, grammatical
a detailed errors, formal
comparison with and very good
existing and report
previous studies, a structure with
graphical a formal title,
3
School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences Session: 2024/2025
representation of contents,
analysis, very good listings, proper
summarization, sections, page
very good numbers, and
presentation of appendices.
highlighted issues
and very good
recommendations.
(70-79) Good background Good 10% Harvard style
discussion, good academic plagiarized. of referencing.
The references
discussion of style of
are provided
existing issues, a writing, with but may have
detailed fewer errors, missed a few
comparison with formal and instances.
existing and good report
previous studies, structure with
good a formal title,
summarization, contents,
good presentation listings, proper
of highlighted sections and
issues and good page numbers.
recommendations.
(60-69) Fair background Fair academic 15% Harvard style
discussion, style of plagiarized. of referencing.
writing, fair Proper
coverage of
references are
existing issues, report not provided
some comparison structure with however good
with existing and a formal title, attempt is
previous studies, contents, made.
fair listings, proper
summarization, sections and
fair presentation of page numbers.
highlighted issues
and few
recommendations.
(50-59) Background The formal 20% Harvard style
discussion, style of writing, plagiarized. of referencing.
existing issues some report References are
highlighted at structures with missed
some level, formal frequently.
summarization, title, contents,
and few listings, proper
recommendations. sections and
page numbers
4
School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences Session: 2024/2025
(40-49) Background Some report 25% Almost no
discussion, some structures with Plagiarized. references are
discussion about a formal title, provided.
existing issues, and contents,
summarization. listings, proper
sections and
page numbers.
(30-39) Some discussion Poor report 30% No references
about existing structure with Plagiarized. are provided.
issues, and title and
summarization. contents, and
page numbers.
(10-29) Submission of Bad report 35% No references
some reports with structure. Plagiarized. are provided.
entirely bad
content.
(0) Submissions over 50% plagiarism
index will be rejected.
