EVALUATION OF A CLASS SESSION
UNDERGRADUATE ENGLISH TEACHING PROGRAM INSTRUMENT 02 CARTAGENA DE INDIAS
EVALUATION CRITERIA OF INTERN PERFORMANCE
INTERNSHIP CENTER
NAME OF STUDENT-INTERN
NAME OF TUTOR
DATE OF CLASS GRADE
QUALITATIVE EVALUATION CRITERIA 5(Proficient), 4(Competent), 3(Developing), 2(Emergent), 1(Not observed)
TOPIC OF CLASS
Criteria Interpretation
5. Proficient The pre-service teacher demonstrates consistent and effective delivery during the time of the observation.
4. Competent The pre-service teacher demonstrates domain of the component during the time of the observation.
3. Developing The pre-service teacher demonstrates adequate delivery of the component during the time of the observation.
2. Emergent The pre-service teacher demonstrates inconsistent delivery of the components during the time of the observation.
1.Not observed The pre-service teacher does not demonstrate the expected behavior during the time of the observation.
I. CLASS PREPARATION 5 4 3 2 1 0
1. Language objectives clearly defined, displayed and reviewed with students.
2. Content concepts appropriate for age and educational background level of students
3. Supplementary materials used to a high degree, making the lesson clear and meaningful
4. Meaningful activities that integrate lesson concepts with language practice opportunities for
reading, writing, listening and/or speaking.
Add up all the individual scores and divide by the number of items Score:
Comments:
II. BUILDING BACKGROUND 5 4 3 2 1 0
1. Concept explicitly linked to students’ background experiences and context
2. Links explicitly made between past learning and new concepts
3. Key vocabulary emphasized
Score:
Comments:
III. COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT 5 4 3 2 1 0
1. Speech appropriate for students’ proficiency level
2. Clear explanations of academic tasks
3. A variety of techniques to make concepts clear
Score:
Comments:
IV. INTERACTION 5 4 3 2 1 0
1.Frequent opportunities for interaction and discussion between teacher/student and among
students
2. Grouping configurations support language and content objectives of the lesson
3. Sufficient wait time for student responses consistently provided
Score:
Comments:
V. PRACTICE AND APPLICATION 5 4 3 2 1 0
1.Hands-on materials and/or manipulatives provided for students to practice using new
content knowledge
2. Activities provided to apply language knowledge
3. Activities integrate all language skills
Score:
Comments:
VI. LESSON DELIVERY 5 4 3 2 1 0
Language objectives clearly supported by lesson delivery
Students engaged in classroom activities
Pacing of the lesson appropriate to students’ ability level
Scaffolding techniques consistently used assisting and supporting students understanding
Supportive classroom climate
Score:
Comments:
VII. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT 5 4 3 2 1 0
1.Comprehensible review of key vocabulary
2.Comprehensible review of key content concepts
3.Regular feedback provided to students on their output
4.Assessment of students comprehension and learning of all lesson objectives throughout
the lesson
Score:
Comments:
Final grade
Components I II III IV V VI VII Final grade
Scores /7
Supervisor’s signature: Date:
