Impact of Ingredient Labelling on Consumer Buying Behavior in the Market

Sukesh Rao P1
1
Faculty of Manel Srinivas Nayak PG Studies, Bondel, Mangalore – 575008
______________________________________________________________________________

Abstract
Ingredient labeling is now a vital resource in shaping consumer decision-making, especially in
the ever-growing health-oriented food and beverage industry. This research investigates how
ingredient labeling affects consumer purchasing habits by looking at labelling presentation,
consumer knowledge, and demographic variables. Employing a mixed-method study, comprising
a survey of 250 shoppers and review of published literature, the study finds that although most
consumers check ingredient labels, understanding is hindered by complicated language and
variegated layout. Interpretative labelling schemes like Nutri-Score and traffic lights were found
to be more conducive in affecting purchasing decisions than conventional numerical forms. In
addition, education, income, age, and gender were determined to be significant demographic
drivers of label use. The research emphasizes the necessity for more concise, uniform labelling
policies and focused consumer education designed to optimize label use. Enhanced labeling not
only fosters better-informed decisions but also stimulates healthier consumer practices and more
transparent markets.

Keywords: Ingredient labelling, nutritional information, food choice, health awareness,

purchasing decision, front-of-pack labels.

1. Introduction
In the current health-aware society, consumers increasingly demand transparency in the products
they buy, especially in the food and beverage sector. Ingredient labelling is an indispensable
element in providing consumers with information about the contents, nutritional content, and
likely health effects of the products they consume. Governments worldwide have adopted many
types of labelling legislation to improve food safety, increase consumer awareness, and enhance
public health. Yet, the power of these labels to sway consumer behavior continues to be a topic

1
of research and industry interest. Consumer purchasing behavior is multifaceted and determined
by numerous factors such as psychological, economic, social, and personal factors. Ingredient
labels are informational tools that can enable informed decision-making or, when ineptly
constructed, discourage consumer comprehension. The increasing prevalence of lifestyle
diseases like diabetes, hypertension, and obesity has created greater demand for simplicity and
readability in food labeling. As more consumers proactively look for nutritional information and
the source of ingredients, the role of ingredient labeling cannot be emphasized enough. While
there is greater awareness, there is still a gap between what consumers need to know and what
they are able to infer from current labels. This paper examines the contribution of ingredient
labeling towards influencing consumer purchasing behavior in the marketplace. It determines the
degree of consumer use of ingredient labels, the effectiveness of different label formats, and
measures demographic characteristics that impact the use of labels. The study's results can assist
manufacturers, policymakers, and marketers to better label design to inform and shape consumer
decision-making efficiently.

2. Objectives
The primary objectives of this research paper are:
1. To investigate how ingredient labelling influences consumer buying decisions.
2. To assess consumer awareness, interpretation, and trust in ingredient labelling.
3. To evaluate the effectiveness of different labelling formats (e.g., front-of-pack, traffic
light, Nutri-Score).
4. To examine demographic factors such as age, education, and income in relation to label
usage.
5. To propose strategies for improving the impact of labelling on informed consumer
choice.

3. Literature Review
3.1 Importance of Ingredient Labelling
Ingredient labelling is an essential regulatory and information element for consumers. As per
Campos et al. (2011), consumers who read food labels are more likely to have healthier food

2
options. Ingredient lists, when well-expressed, assist consumers in avoiding allergens, tracking
sugar or sodium levels, and matching choices with dietary needs (Cowburn & Stockley, 2005).
3.2 Consumer Interpretation of Labels
Interpretation of ingredient labels varies significantly among consumers. Grunert and Wills
(2007) note that while many consumers claim to use food labels, their understanding of
nutritional information is limited. The complexity of scientific terminology, portion sizes, and
lack of standardized formatting often hampers effective use. Feldman et al. (2021) argue that
interpretative labels such as traffic light systems or Nutri-Score are more effective in helping
consumers make healthier choices than non-interpretative labels like numeric nutrition tables.
These simplified visual cues improve cognitive processing and reduce decision-making time.

3.3 Impact on Consumer Buying Behavior

Several studies demonstrate a positive correlation between label usage and healthier purchases.
A study by van Herpen et al. (2012) found that front-of-pack labels influenced purchasing
decisions in supermarket environments, especially among health-conscious consumers.
However, others like Drichoutis et al. (2006) suggest that while labels may raise awareness, they
do not always translate to behavioral change unless supported by educational initiatives.
Additionally, factors like price sensitivity, brand loyalty, and habitual purchasing can override
labelling information.

3.4 Demographic Influences

Demographic factors significantly influence the use and effectiveness of ingredient labelling.
Research by Satia et al. (2005) indicates that individuals with higher education and income levels
are more likely to read and act on nutritional information. Age and gender also play roles;
women and older adults tend to use food labels more frequently than men and younger
consumers. Moreover, regional and cultural differences affect label perception. For instance,
consumers in developed countries are generally more aware and trusting of food labelling than
those in developing nations (Rupprecht et al., 2020).

4. Methodology

3
This research adopts a qualitative and quantitative mixed-method approach. Primary data was
collected through an online survey administered to 250 respondents across different age groups,
educational backgrounds, and income levels. The questionnaire focused on consumer awareness,
understanding, and response to various labelling formats.
Secondary data was sourced from academic journals, regulatory body publications (such as
WHO, FDA), and case studies involving labelling reforms. Descriptive statistics and thematic
analysis were used to interpret the data, identify patterns, and draw conclusions.

5. Findings and Discussion

5.1 Consumer Awareness and Usage
The survey revealed that 78% of participants regularly check ingredient labels, with 64% stating
that it influences their purchase decision. The most commonly checked elements were sugar
content, artificial preservatives, and allergens. However, only 39% claimed to fully understand
the technical terms used in ingredient lists.

5.2 Preference for Labelling Formats

Among different labelling styles, 72% preferred interpretative labels such as color-coded traffic
lights or Nutri-Score systems. These formats were considered user-friendly and quicker to
process. On the other hand, traditional numeric tables were viewed as complex and time-
consuming. Interestingly, consumers expressed greater trust in products with transparent and
concise ingredient labelling, often associating them with higher quality and safety.

5.3 Influence of Demographics

The use of ingredient labels increased with education level. Graduate-level participants were
twice as likely to use labels for making decisions compared to those with only a high school
education. Income also played a role: higher-income consumers tended to buy products
perceived as healthier, even if priced higher, provided the labels justified the value. Women and
older adults (45+) were more attentive to ingredient lists, often citing health concerns such as
diabetes or high blood pressure as motivating factors.

5.4 Barriers to Effective Use

4
Major barriers identified were:
1. Complex terminology and scientific jargon.
2. Small font sizes and cluttered label design.
3. Lack of standardized labelling formats across brands.
4. Information overload on packaging.
Consumers recommended clearer language, visual aids (e.g., icons), and front-of-pack
summaries to enhance usability.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Ingredient labelling significantly influences consumer buying behavior, especially among health-
conscious and educated consumers. While awareness of food content is high, comprehension
remains limited due to complex language and inconsistent formats. To enhance the utility of
ingredient labelling, Policymakers should promote standardized and simplified formats like
traffic light systems or Nutri-Score labels. Food manufacturers must prioritize transparency and
design user-friendly labels that facilitate informed choices. Consumer education campaigns can
further bridge the gap between awareness and understanding, empowering more consumers to
make healthier decisions. Ultimately, effective labelling not only benefits consumers but also
encourages manufacturers to offer better-quality products, creating a more transparent and
health-focused marketplace.

References
1. Campos, S., Doxey, J., & Hammond, D. (2011). Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods:
A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 14(8), 1496–1506.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010003290
2. Cowburn, G., & Stockley, L. (2005). Consumer understanding and use of nutrition
labelling: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 8(1), 21–28.
https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2004666
3. Grunert, K. G., & Wills, J. M. (2007). A review of European research on consumer
response to nutrition information on food labels. Journal of Public Health, 15(5), 385–
399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-007-0101-9

5
4. Feldman, C., Bardenheier, B., & Bullard, K. (2021). The effect of interpretive front-of-
package nutrition labels on consumer purchasing behavior: A systematic review.
Appetite, 161, 105121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105121
5. van Herpen, E., Hieke, S., Trijp, H. C. M. van, & Stichler, M. (2012). The impact of
front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer product evaluation and choice: A meta-
analysis. Food Policy, 35(3), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.001
6. Drichoutis, A. C., Lazaridis, P., & Nayga, R. M. Jr. (2006). Consumers’ use of nutritional
labels: A review of research studies and issues. Academy of Marketing Science Review,
2006(10), 1–22.
7. Satia, J. A., Galanko, J. A., & Neuhouser, M. L. (2005). Food nutrition label use is
associated with demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors and dietary intake
among African Americans. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(3), 392–
402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.12.006
8. Rupprecht, C. D. D., Fujiyoshi, L., McGreevy, S. R., & Tayasu, I. (2020). Trust in the
food system and use of food labels by consumers in Japan. Food Control, 112, 107107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107107
9. World Health Organization. (2020). Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: Guiding principles
and framework manual. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241519570
10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Food labeling guide.
https://www.fda.gov/media/81606/download
11. Nutri-Score. (2021). Scientific background and rationale. https://nutriscore.coliposte.fr
12. Institute of Medicine. (2009). Front-of-package nutrition rating systems and symbols:
Phase I report. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12650
13. Hawley, K. L., Roberto, C. A., Bragg, M. A., Liu, P. J., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K.
D. (2013). The science on front-of-package food labels. Public Health Nutrition, 16(3),
430–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012000754
14. Becker, M. W., Bello, N. M., & Sundar, R. P. (2021). Impact of label format and font
size on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 291–305.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1197