1.
Index
1. Letter from Executive Board
2. About the Committee
3. Rules of Procedure
4. Documentation
5. Introduction
6. Historical Background
7. Case Studies
8. Questions to Consider
9. Further Links to Research
1. Letter from the Executive Board
Dear Delegates,
On behalf of the Executive Board of the World Health Organisation committee at
Pii MUN 3.0, I, Mr. Aarav Sharma the presiding Executive Director or the
Chairperson of the World Health Organisation welcomes you to the committee. I
believe guides for student learning undermine growth because the most essential
characteristic of the activity-research-all too frequently is overlooked. Still, we are
fairly certain this background guide will serve as a good foundation for your
research. It is deliberately general, giving only a glimpse of what the Executive
Board considers important for you to know before you start digging deeper. Make
sure that your research goes beyond the areas underlined and pushes you to dig
into related matters through logical inference.
Background guide is just there to provide some foundational context about the
topic at hand that they may find lacking in some detail. We are not looking for pre-
existing solutions or country-specific strategies simply aimed at reproducing the
positions.
Rather, we are looking for new ideas from all of you, which always keep in mind
both the practical and ideological limitations.
Your task will be to present a resolution that is a good, practical prescription for
treaty breakdown, political impasse, and problems that are likely to move toward
conflict, especially in international shipping routes, and how they can be made
sustainable and viable. Most importantly, interact with other delegates not just as
representatives of other portfolios, but as colleagues traversing the challenges of
the committee. You might even make lifelong friendships along the way.
Good luck!
Warm Regards,
Mr. Aarav Sharma || Executive Director
[email protected]+91 8976102689
2. About the Com
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United
Nations, established on April 7, 1948, and is based in Geneva, Switzerland. It was
created to improve health and well-being for people all over the world, regardless
of their nationality or background. The WHO works with countries to build stronger
health systems and prevent the spread of diseases. Its mission is to promote
health, keep the world safe, and help the most vulnerable communities. It includes
health experts, scientists, and doctors from different parts of the world who share
knowledge and solutions. The WHO supports countries by giving advice,
resources, and training. It also collects health data from around the world to track
diseases and find solutions. Health is a basic human right, and the WHO believes
that everyone should have access to clean water, safe food, vaccines, and
medicine. It works in almost every country through offices and partnerships with
local health ministries. By working together globally, the WHO helps ensure
healthier lives for everyone.
One of the WHO’s most important roles is responding to health emergencies, such
as disease outbreaks, natural disasters, and pandemics. When an emergency
happens, the WHO provides expert advice, sends doctors and supplies, and helps
countries manage the crisis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO guided
governments, promoted vaccine distribution, and gave the public accurate
information about staying safe. It helps stop the spread of dangerous diseases like
Ebola, malaria, cholera, and polio. The organization also supports immunization
campaigns that protect millions of children each year. In poor or remote regions,
the WHO helps deliver vaccines and trains healthcare workers. It works with
governments to prepare for future health emergencies by improving hospitals and
medical supply systems. The WHO also creates global plans for fighting long-term
health threats like antimicrobial resistance. In every crisis, it acts quickly to reduce
harm and save lives. Without international cooperation led by the WHO, many
health emergencies could become global disasters.
Besides emergencies, the WHO focuses on everyday health and disease prevention
by promoting healthy habits. It educates people about good nutrition, exercise,
hygiene, mental health, and avoiding harmful substances like tobacco.
The WHO sets international guidelines to help countries make health laws, such as
food safety standards or clean air policies. It also works to reduce health inequalities,
making sure people in all regions have access to care. The WHO supports countries
in achieving universal health coverage, which means everyone can get healthcare
without financial hardship. It also studies global health problems and shares research
with doctors, scientists, and governments. From clean water to safe childbirth, the
WHO helps improve life at every stage. By spreading awareness and creating strong
health systems, it helps prevent problems before they begin. Its work touches billions
of lives through education, innovation, and support. In all these ways, the WHO leads
efforts to build a healthier and more equal world.
3. Rules of Procedure
The committee would be strictly adhering to UNA-USA RoP’s.
4. Documentation
The Executive Board would be accepting the following documents:-
• Position Paper (NO SPECIFIC AWARD FOR BEST POSITION PAPER)
• Working Papers
• End documentation – would be informed by the Executive Board on the day of the
training session.
5. Introduction to the Agenda
The rising use of e-cigarettes and vaping products among youth represents a
growing and deeply concerning public health challenge. What began as a
technology promoted for detriment reduction among adult smokers has snappily
come a wide gateway to nicotine dependence for adolescents around the world. In
numerous regions, vaping frequence among teenagers now surpasses that of
traditional cigarette use, motioning a critical shift in tobacco and nicotine
consumption trends. With satiny designs, sweet flavors, and social media
marketing, these products are being strategically designed and promoted to attract
a youngish demographic — numerous of whom have noway used tobacco
products ahead. This disturbing pattern is reversing decades of progress in tobacco
control and placing a new generation at threat.
Nicotine exposure during nonage has well- proven consequences. It affects the
developing brain, particularly regions responsible for attention, literacy, and
emotional regulation. youthful druggies who begin vaping are more likely to come
addicted to nicotine and are at an advanced threat of transitioning to combustive
tobacco use.
Also,e-cigarette aerosols are known to contain dangerous substances similar to
heavy essence, unpredictable organic composites, and chemicals linked to serious
lung injury. Despite these pitfalls, the perception that vaping is a “ safer ” or “ cleaner
” volition to smoking continues to mislead youth, frequently fueled by limited
advertising and misinformation. These misconceptions must be corrected through
rigorous public education and nonsupervisory oversight.
Critical action is demanded at both public and global situations. programs must
include a ban on seasoned-cigarettes that appeal to minors, strict enforcement of
age restrictions, and clear packaging and labeling that advise of the pitfalls.
Marketing of vaping products through platforms visited by youth, including social
media and entertainment media, must be banned. Financial measures similar to
taxation and impositions should be considered to reduce affordability and
availability. Also, seminaries, communities, and healthcare systems must be
engaged in mindfulness juggernauts that equip youthful people with accurate
information and help them make informed opinions about their health.
Strengthening surveillance systems to cover youth operation trends and product
developments is also essential to inform timely policy responses.
Governments are prompted to act decisively and repel external influences from
marketable diligence that may attempt to weaken regulations under the guise of
invention or detriment reduction. E-cigarette manufacturers, numerous of whom
are tied to the tobacco assiduity, continue to invest in targeted marketing and
lobbying sweats that hang the integrity of public health programs. Coordinated
transnational cooperation is critical to icing thickness in regulation and
enforcement, particularly in regions with weaker legal fabrics. Cross-border
marketing, online deals, and product smuggling must be addressed through
multinational collaboration and specialized support.
The global health community must remain united in its commitment to guarding
youth from the damages of nicotine and affiliated substances. The long- term
health, well- being, and development of the coming generation are at stake. Through
comprehensive regulation, education, and surveillance, it's possible to reverse the
rise of youth vaping and help millions from entering a lifelong cycle of dependence.
This extremity demands not only nippy action, but sustained and coordinated
trouble across sectors and borders. A healthier future is within reach — but it
depends on the choices made at the moment.
6. Historical Background
The history of e-cigarettes traces back to the early 2000s, when the first
ultramodern electronic nicotine delivery system( ENDS) was developed by a
Chinese druggist as a purportedly safer volition to smoking. These early models
gained modest attention, primarily among adult smokers seeking to reduce or quit
traditional cigarette use. still, by the late 2000s and early 2010s,e-cigarette
technology had evolved fleetly. Products came more effective in nicotine delivery,
easier to use, and significantly more charming due to customizable features, satiny
designs, and seasoned options. This shift coincided with a dramatic change in
marketing strategies, moving from conclusion support to youth- acquainted life
branding.
In numerous high- income countries, nonsupervisory gaps and slow policy
responses allowed the vaping assiduity to expand with minimum oversight. Unlike
traditional tobacco, which had been subject to decades of regulation,e-cigarettes
entered requests as unclassified consumer products, bypassing being tobacco
control fabrics.
As a result, advertising for vaping bias flourished — particularly on social media
platforms, where influencers and celebrity signatures glamoured their use. The
preface of high- nicotine swab formulas, especially by companies similar as JUUL,
led to a swell in nicotine consumption, frequently by individuals with no previous
history of tobacco use. By the mid-2010s, intimidating trends surfaced. checks from
multiple countries reported a sharp increase in adolescent vaping. In the United
States, for case,e-cigarette use among high academy scholars soared by over 900
between 2011 and 2015. analogous patterns were proved in Europe, Southeast
Asia, and corridor of the Western Pacific. While some governments moved to put
restrictions, numerous responses were disintegrated or delayed. Meanwhile, the
assiduity continued to introduce — developing lower, more concealable bias,
frequently suggesting USB drives or pens, which further enabled discreet use
among teenagers, indeed in academy settings.
The public health counter accusations began to surface further prominently around
2018, with mounting substantiation of youth nicotine dependence, respiratory
issues, and psychosocial consequences. In 2019, the outbreak of e-cigarette or
vaping- associated lung injury( EVALI), particularly in North America, drew global
attention to the troubles of limited vaping products. Though EVALI was largely
linked to lawless THC- containing products, it underlined the critical need for
nonsupervisory oversight and product safety norms. It also revealed the
vulnerability of youthful druggies, who frequently demanded full mindfulness of
what substances they were gobbling.
At the moment, vaping among youth isn't confined to any one region — it is a global
issue, affecting both developed and developing nations. The literal line of this
epidemic highlights a pattern seen in former tobacco heads: a new product enters
the request with limited oversight, earnings fashionability through deceiving
creation, and becomes extensively espoused before health authorities can
intermediate effectively.
Assignments from this history must inform current strategies. Unlike with cigarettes,
the world now has an occasion to act sooner and more decisively, precluding
further entrenchment of a dangerous geste among youth populations.
7. Case Study
Case Study 1 United States – A Rapid Rise in Youth Vaping and the
Regulatory Catch- up
Between 2011 and 2019, the United States endured a dramatic swell in
youth vaping, particularly among middle and high academy scholars. The
tilting point came with the wide fashionability of JUUL, a satiny, USB-
shaped-cigarette introduced in 2015. Unlike earlier bias, JUUL used
nicotine mariners, allowing for an advanced attention of nicotine to be
delivered more easily, significantly adding the threat of dependence —
especially for first- time druggies. The company’s early marketing
juggernauts featured youthful models, trendy illustrations, and social
media influencers, which explosively appealed to teenagers despite being
officially targeted at adult smokers.
By 2018, public checks reported that over 20 of high academy scholars
were laboriously using e-cigarettes, compared to just 1.5 in 2011. Public
health officers declared the situation an epidemic. In 2019, the United
States faced an fresh extremity when over 2,800 cases of EVALI(e-
cigarette or vaping- associated lung injury) were reported, performing in
dozens of deaths. Though the cause was ultimately linked to lawless THC
products, the outbreak stressed the lack of product regulation and stoner
mindfulness. In response, the U.S. The Food and Drug Administration(
FDA) began confining the trade of seasoned-cigarettes and tensing
oversight of marketing practices. Several countries enforced their own
bans on seasoned vaping products.
This case underscores the consequences of delayed regulation in the face
of rapid-fire technological and marketing developments. It also highlights
how youth-friendly product design and seasoning, coupled with social
media influence, can significantly outpace being tobacco control
programs. While nonsupervisory action has since improved, the
U.S. experience demonstrates the significance of visionary, rather than
reactive, public health governance.
Case Study 2 Australia – A conservative Approach to Nicotine
Vaping Products
Australia has taken a distinctly preventative station one-cigarettes,
particularly those containing nicotine. Feting beforehand the implicit
pitfalls associated with youth uptake, the Australian government chose not
to legalize the marketable trade of nicotine- containing e-cigarettes
without a medical tradition. Under public law, nicotine is classified as a
Schedule 4 bane, making it illegal to vend or retain for particular use
without proper authorization. This strict policy frame, guided by a public
health rather than a marketable approach, was designed to help youth
exposure before a significant epidemic could crop .
Despite these legal walls, the use of lawless nicotine vaping products has
increased, particularly among youthful people carrying them through
online or black- request sources. A 2022 public check reported that nearly
one in five 18 – 24- time- pasts had used-cigarettes, with the utmost
penetrating them immorally. In response, the Australian government
blazoned a major policy overhaul in 2023, introducing tighter border
controls, increased penalties for illegal importation, a ban on all non-
prescription vaping products, and a phase- eschewal of disposable vapes,
which are generally used by teenagers.
This case demonstrates both the strengths and limitations of a restrictive,
health-first policy terrain. While Australia’s early resistance to request-
grounded vaping models helped help the type of wide youth epidemic
seen in other countries, gaps in enforcement and transnationale-
commerce posed new challenges. The Australian experience offers
precious perceptivity into the significance of comprehensive, enforceable
regulation, public education, and global cooperation in precluding the
youth vaping extremity.
8. Questions to Consider
1. What measures are in place in your country to regulate the sale and
marketing of e-cigarettes and vaping products, particularly with respect to
youth access and appeal?
2. How does your country educate youth, parents, and educators about the risks
associated with e-cigarettes and vaping, and what strategies are in place to
raise awareness of the long-term health consequences?
3. Does your country have a comprehensive surveillance system to track trends
in youth vaping, including age, frequency, and types of products used, and
how do you use this data to inform policy and prevention strategies?
4. What steps is your country taking to close loopholes in the regulation of
online sales and international product smuggling, which allow e-cigarettes
to reach young people despite national restrictions?
5. How are your national health authorities collaborating with schools, local
governments, and community organizations to provide resources and support
for youth tobacco and nicotine prevention programs?
6. What is your country’s plan to address the potential long-term health impacts
of e-cigarette use, especially among young people, and how are you
preparing to mitigate future public health burdens related to vaping-related
diseases?
9. Further links to Research
1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538685/
2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7274878/
3. https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2023-urgent-action-needed-to-protect-
childr en-and-prevent-the-uptake-of-e-cigarettes
4. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-new-steps-
ad dress-epidemic-youth-e-cigarette-use-including-historic-action-against-
more
5. https://www.heartandstroke.ca/-/media/pdf-files/position-statements/vaping-
crisis- position-statement.pdf?rev=325ec1c4d23942058acf0d55d2b97989
